Item(s)

• Discussion relating to Interim Planning Commission Rules and Procedures.
• Discussion and action to select a meeting date for a special called meeting of the Planning Commission

Sound Search™

• you deliberate later and, uh, uh, consider, uh, being the first planning commission to ever make recommendations on the building
• codes, at least in, I've been showing up here since 77, and I've never seen a planning commission do that before
• now hear from the applicant for five minutes. Good evening Planning Commission members. I'm Alice Glasgow representing the
• not have hashed out 100% of the agreement when we came to the planning commission. So, so like we are
• , we are prepared for the planning commission to decide to postpone it or not postpone it. But, but I
• Anderson. You know, you're, you're only leverage that you've got as the neighborhood is through the Planning commission and
• council. Um, if the Planning Commission approves this and if council approves it, there's, there's really nothing
• come to planning commission? I don't know where they are on the Gantt chart in the process. That was
• A PDA that has been approved, um, through the planning commission. More recently, I just indicated did one in
• , and then that gives us the opportunity to, to review that and see if this planning commission feels comfortable
• city council here. It's saying that planning commission did recommend MF four there, which was not what city
• planning commission itself has not always fallen in line with that. Can you speak a little bit about how we're
• action tonight. The, um, uh, planning commission rules and procedures that, um, are provided in the backup
• that staff does as part of the planning commission sort of, you know, purview. And that's something for
• select a meeting date for the special called meeting of the planning commission. Um, there were a few
• , that has a practical impact on essentially every single planning commission agenda. So I, I would better offer
• next planning commission. Commissioner Kel, can you include me on that Sort? Yes, sorry. The conversation is

Sound Search™

• , but I'm gonna be, um, investigating that, hopefully pre, uh, planning commission. Um, and then, uh, yeah, so
• report was more general. It was, it was intended for planning commission for y'all, et cetera, for just
• and we are back here this evening. Um, we have pres provided our, um, backup to the planning
• commission and we'll be presenting before then as well as the housing and planning committee for council. Um

Sound Search™

• Is Tuesday, August 20th. This is the regular meeting of the Zoning and Planning Commission. We are in City Hall Council Chambers, room
• have been posted for planning commission. So it is withdrawn and will be on the Planning Commission agenda of September 10th
• six is a discussion item, and seven is withdrawn and will be on planning commission September 10th. Do I hear comments
• revised by the, um, city council on the 29th of August, which is next Thursday. Um, the planning commission made one
• recommendation by the Zoning and Planning Commission. The applicant is in agreement with maintaining the CO as a part of
• Road that has CSV. I'm sure those properties still will be coming through to the planning commission with DB 90 because
• has two parts on the planning commission. No, on the staff recommendation and only one on the planning commission. So
• , um, the staff version of the draft ordinances, There's a staff version and there's a planning commission version And
• version. Right. And and the main difference between those two versions is the decibel limit that planning commission recommended
• Delayed implementation? Delayed implementation Under staff's recommendation, there's a part two A and B under Planning commission part
• Central Waterfront advisory Board, that's what it's, and then it will move on to the planning commission. That's
• DB 90 prior to the zoning request being amended. This case was last heard at the December 19th, 2023 zoning and planning
• commission meeting where C-S-M-U-V-C-O was recommended by consent on February 1st, city Council approved this recommendation on first reading only
• planning Part two. Is that the October 1st date? Yes. Okay. So the October 1st date is only for the tenant
• ? Yes. Okay. And um, that moves forward to the environmental commission, I think tomorrow. And then the planning
• commission and then council if things go according to plan. Oh no, also the south central waterfront overlay whatever

Sound Search™

• reasonable proposals for cuts that should be seriously considered. I am a member of the Zoning and Planning Commission, and

Sound Search™

• Have quorum present within the council chambers. I now call this meeting of the planning commission to order at 6:12 PM So first off
• it here at Planning Commission, that we have a commitment from you verbally here that you will work with
• what was resonating the most. Um, and a planning commission is open to making whatever recommendation they deem
• this planning commission is willing to, to start that process, I am all for it. And I will be an
• planning commission, I think we've come to a place where, where we feel that restrictive covenants that
• it's the first time we actually come with the technical codes to the Planning Commission, let me give
• codes. So the planning commission has had a direct interest in this since the beginning of the year
• planning commission. Um, my understanding is that we should go ahead and put that into the, a future
• this item until, uh, the October 27th planning commission meeting, and we will provide an update in detail
• that one of our agenda items on planning commission this evening is actually gonna be taken up by the
• regarding that at the next planning commission meeting. 35. City of Austin Buildings working group, we have not
• between tenants and property owners. Tenants are cautiously optimistic that proceeding with the rezoning application before planning
• commission can be a sign of good faith. That management and ownership will continue to take steps to rebuild
• ? Correct. Okay. Because I do agree with Commissioner Wood, it makes it very hard. Again, as the planning
• commission, we were trying to think broadly of all of our needs in the community, how do we

Sound Search™

• on the City planning commission, we had a, we used a different number that was still small, but it was

Sound Search™

• Street. Staff recommends that this Landmark Commission recommend historic zoning to planning commission and city council and
• voting against the motion. Um, I, I think that one of the biggest things is that planning commission has
• , I think, community members from the planning commission and how many a RC meetings we've engaged. We've had

Sound Search™

• The Zoning and Planning Commission. We are in Austin, city Hall, board and Commissions. Room 1101. I will six. Hmm. There's only six

Sound Search™

• was passed to the Planning Commission. So, um, the planning commission is, is due to provide a report back to council
• with it. We've been in communication with, uh, with the planning commission. We provided a letter, uh, from all the

Sound Search™

• great growth, a lot of growth in our center from the beginning while I was on the pre-Planning Commission and