|
Planning Commission
|
May 14, 2024
|
Video
Agenda
|
|
Sound Search™
- this meeting the planning commission order at 6:12 PM First off, we will take roll call. Um, so just acknowledge your presence
- health benefit veterans with PTSD such as myself, the opportunities are endless. And the Planning Commission has an opportunity
- , and I would, I mean, I would like to work with this planning commission because the other commission seem not to
- Austin. This is the Imagine Austin Planning Commission, FY 24 25 CIP. Memo of recommendations. This item is up for consent
- sign up to bring those concerns to us as a planning commission and speak to 'em directly versus requesting
- sat where you sit. I used to be on the planning commission and having you choose between affordable housing
- Planning Commission Google Maps. So first of all, can you review one more time, this is an affordability unlocked
- on this memo. Okay. So a brief, a memorandum that's provided to the planning commission, does it require it
- council um, basically for the planning commission to get a briefing and then review the technical code updates
- City Council felt that it would be ideal for us as planning commission to understand the proposed amendments as
- these would be excellent. Um, I know we have several technical experts on our planning commission, and I'm hoping
- of this process and ensure that we've really taken into account any recommendations that the planning co commission
- recommendations at our next planning commission meeting. That's such a great thing to do after your honeymoon. Um
- . We'll go to our q and a. So first, commissioner with a question, comm. Commissioner Cox Wouldn't be a planning
- commission meeting if Commissioner Cox wasn't the one with the question. That's right. Uh, yeah. Question for staff
|
|
City Council Work Session
|
May 14, 2024
|
Video
Agenda
|
|
Sound Search™
- the Planning Commission recommendations. And then we will stand for discussion and questions. I'm gonna ask, uh, assistant city
- Cook, principal Planner, both with the planning department, as you recall, on April 11th City Council. And the Planning Commission held
- city. Since April 11th, staff has hosted four public, public open houses. The Planning Commission has also held a separate meeting
- also like to thank City Council and the planning commission for your hard work, your dedication, support, and collaboration
- , on the slide in front of you are the three amendments that planning Commission offered for the EV charging land use
- phase two. Um, we just wanted to give you an update on staff's response to some of the planning commission recommendations
- . So staff does not support the Planning Commission amendment to exclude the flagpole of a flag lot, um, from
- appropriate. The planning commission also made a number of amendments related to setbacks, including reducing setbacks along internal lot
- for this is, uh, fire safety issues. Um, there are also two amendments from planning commission that are not included
- in the planning Commission version of the draft ordinance, and we just wanted to point those out. First is the
- staff version for Home two. Okay. Um, there was a, it was brought up at the planning commission. The
- planning commission did not recommend it. However, it remains in staff's, um, uh, ordinance. What it would have is
- , case manager for compatibility. Um, I'm going to briefly explain our rationale for the planning commission amendments. We
- amendment. Planning Commission introduced a new 35 foot building height limit for the area between 15 and 25
- not recommend the planning commission suggestion to reduce the noise limit to 45 decibels from the current 70
- ? So the planning commission recommended for lots less than 75 feet in width to have a 30 foot, 35
- April 30th, the planning commission, just Real quick and I apologize. No problem. I don't know who Thomas Simpson is
- planning commission voted to recommend the ETOD overlay with 26 amendments that they made to staff's proposal. Seven
- commission matrix that's posted in backup. The text amendments are as follows, that Planning Commission offered, they recommended
- the Conditional List Planning Commission recommended the non-residential redevelopment requirements from the staff proposal be removed
- . ETOD density bonus projects was another amendment from the Planning commission. They recommended that, um, if a fee
- Staff Ordinance Planning Commission recommend re replacing the non-residential redevelopment requirements, um, to instead require notice
- that with slight language changes in our ordinance. And then finally, planning commission recommended that the fee in
- . I'm gonna present the differences between the planning commission, which is the second column and the staff proposal
- eligible to redevelop under the bonus program. Staff and planning commission had similar language relating to the units. A
- bonus programs. While planning commission did not address the length of affordability, both proposals included similar notice
- provisions to make sure tenants are aware of upcoming redevelopment. The Planning commission recommended that tenants who choose
- % of total units on top of that one-to-one replacement. The planning commission didn't address this. So overall planning
- development than the staff proposal. And therefore we don't recommend passing the Planning Commission amendments on this
- requirements. The Planning Commission made some recommendations on these non-residential redevelopment requirements to determine what a
- 10 years. And overall, the version of non-residential redevelopment required offered by the Planning Commission significantly weakens
- it comes, whether we're going to be working off of the planning commission recommendation or the staff recommendation
- recommendation is that we work off of the planning commission recommendation because that way we have good access to
- have been proposed seem to be proposed off of the planning commission recommendation as opposed to off the
- bidding I would start is that we go from the planning commission recommendation. And Councilman Morales, I said
- planning commission recommendation regarding setbacks and porches and whether five feet of the porch would, um, be taken
- me, I'd assumed we were going on the staff and so I will certainly be looking at the Planning Commission recommendations
- ead we'll go with staff and the others will do the planning commission. 'cause I think that's the last Yes
- . Council member. I, I've been working off planning commission On all of them, Uh, on, on all of them
- be able to agree on that. So what I would, um, recommend is we start with the, the planning commission recommendation
- and everybody pay attention to that. We're gonna start with the planning commission recommendation. Okay. Alright
- broader recommendations, which you can find more information about in the e EAD overlay staff response to planning
- porch line need to be? So I just wanted to flag, um, I also assumed we were working off planning
- commission just because that's typically how, um, a lot of these proposals come to us. Um, so in that case
- we do, and unless I hear just a broad objection, we start with the concept of the the planning
- commission because I, I could see where, uh, I mean we do have, we do have differences. For example, I'm
|
|
Board of Adjustment
|
May 13, 2024
|
Video
Agenda
|
|
Sound Search™
|
|
Design
|
May 13, 2024
|
Video
Agenda
|
|
Sound Search™
|
|
Zero Waste Advisory Commission
|
May 08, 2024
|
Video
Agenda
|
|
Sound Search™
|
|
Urban Transportation
|
May 07, 2024
|
Video
Agenda
|
|
Sound Search™
|
|
Music
|
May 06, 2024
|
Video
Agenda
|
|
Sound Search™
|
|
City Council Meetings
|
May 02, 2024
|
Video
Agenda
|
|
Sound Search™
- concurrence with the council approved East Austin historic resource survey staff and the planning commission recommend
- and the planning commission recommend historic zoning for the historic portion of the home's footprint only as
- so that the historic Landmark Commission and Planning Commission are often more concerned about their voices being
- recommendation. Furthermore, both the historic Landmark Commission and Planning Commission overwhelmingly recommended this property for
- the people of Austin. The planning commission and the city council have a duty to basis decisions upon
- here for the planning commission and this requested that we add the wording for unlocked and tie it
- housing. That's not the case. Also, uh, in the reef sheet says, it mentioned that the planning commission asked
- to come from planning commission to council in 10 days. Sent me a couple other projects that I've
- again, as we did at Planning Commission. Although we differ on this project, they have been professional and
- make a walking motion, I will move approval of this item as proposed by staff and planning commission. And
- as the Planning commission and is recommended by Staff District eight routinely ranks last in the city and
- . I've been here with you since that time. Um, please note that this happened on February 27th. Planning
- , commission meeting. Um, it was indeed postponed, but we were told to show up after we were told not
|
|
Historic Landmark
|
May 01, 2024
|
Video
Agenda
|
|
Sound Search™
|
|
Environmental Commission
|
May 01, 2024
|
Video
Agenda
|
|
Sound Search™
- this to be May 30th, um, of 2024, and we're going to planning commission on May 14th. Um, it was a
- . And so then so it goes to planning commission on May 14th. Yeah, May 14th is planning commission. And so with
- ordinances, planning commission is kind of the official body that gives a formal recommendation to city council. Of
- first, um, so that the Planning Commission can hear your recommendation and consider that with theirs. So it does
- Commission meeting before council, but not before planning commission. I see. I do believe that if you have a
- working group, you can get people from the planning commission in the working group. So there is that to
- to, um, any other board about this ordinance, Mr. Lloyd? Um, we're going to planning commission, um, on this
- to planning commission then. And again, just for context, this really is intended to right size non zoning
- , correct? Yeah. Yeah. So the, the Planning Commission has a codes and ordinances, oh, core codes and Ordinance
- subcommittee that meets with the zoning and planning commission members. Um, so they hear things before they go before
- that you know, this, um, the next meeting is after the planning commission. And, um, that's really a, um
- could have a working group and bring things forward. We could possibly even have that ready for planning commission for
- , uh, brought forward at planning commission and counsel. I guess my suggestion would just to be, to style it
- than the downtown density bonus. When it got to the Planning Commission, somebody decided that it would
|