Sound Search™

• 1964, which prohibits discrimination based on race, color, and national origin to the Planning Commission. And my request is for my
• being forwarded like other individuals from the community when they submit their written testimony to the Planning Commission and even zoning
• before staff and the Planning Commission both recommend the applicant's request. Moving on, item number 38 is C 14 20 23 0 6 6
• 37, all three readings 38, all three readings, 39, all three readings and 40 of the Planning commission recommendation on

Sound Search™

• a, you know, a lot more community support. Um, even at our next meeting and even at the planning and zoning
• commission. I will say, uh, if you guys, you know, read in the news planning and zoning wants to see equity in

Sound Search™

• council and planning commission to consider before adoption. Um, another thing that we're working on right now is, um, cap
• schedule is, uh, moving forward. We have a planning commission hearing next Tuesday. Uh, that'll be a, a required public
• hearing. Uh, that planning commission will have to make a recommendation on. Uh, and then city council a couple weeks ago
• , uh, will be available as part of the backup for the planning commission hearing. Uh, the law department asked us not
• definitely go in the staff report to both planning commission and city council. So at minimum it would be noted that
• this makes more sense, but if the Planning commission City Council and their infinite wisdom 7.5 is more accessible

Sound Search™

• September 26. 2023. And, uh, bring this meeting of the planning commission to order. Uh, it is six 10. Uh, we'll go ahead and start
• Creek Drive, district three. This item is up for Planning Commission postponement to October 24th. Number 26, item number 26 is abut
• get started. Bring this meeting back to order of the planning commission at, uh, 6 48. And we were back on item
• predictability on what happens with the planning commission and, and other cases. And so that's, that's where the impetus for this
• came from. And so for the planning commission, you'll likely see less postponements. Um, you'll likely see, um, applicants
• you should not feel. The planning commission shouldn't say, well, my God, we don't have any zoning cases anymore,
• , uh, city council can ask for an extension and city manager can end it if we just, if planning commission, you
• back for extending it beyond six months and, and making this a permanent change? Did it come back to planning commission for
• is gonna be captured so that when it comes back to the planning commission, they will know that it's either working
• come back to the planning commission before it is, uh, considered for termination and before it is considered, uh, for
• to planning commission and council before being terminated and also, uh, for extending beyond the six months. And so I
• Planning Commission, um, which is an update so we know how it's going on top of your other two requests. Well, let's
• present for presenting today. In addition, we have three items form the planning commission, 36, 37, and 38. The one that
• meeting with, um, planning commission members and zoning and planning commission members to review the, uh, imagine Austin plan and
• offline and, um, between now and the next planning commission meeting? And by the way, when is the next quarterly meeting
• for the planning commission, um, kind of filled up before I got on the Planning commission. So I'm, I I won't
• you. 7 42 meeting of the planning commission is adjourned. Thank y'all. And be, you must be river down to the sea on.
• action. So my question, you know, very much along those lines is, before terminating the program, would the Planning
• Commission have an opportunity to review the program and, and how it's going before it's terminated? Yes. We're happy to accept

Sound Search™

• think probably the public is aware that the mayor has asked for a joint planning commission, city council meeting, and
• then a planning commission meeting, and then another city council meeting, which gives an opportunity for the public to give

Item(s)

• Approve an ordinance relating to a joint public hearing between the City Council and the Planning Commission
• Approve an ordinance relating to a joint public hearing between the City Council and the Planning Commission

Sound Search™

• for the planning commission, um, to set up the date. Okay. And it, exhibit A doesn't specify the timing between
• the joint hearing Planning Commission and counsel hearings. What is the intention in that regard? It depends when
• we're able to set the joint public hearing and when the next planning commission, when meeting would be and
• meeting and then planning commission and then city council meeting too close together, uh, I agree, runs a foul
• the subject matter of the joint hearing and then what planning commission would be making recommendations on and what
• planning commission is a, a significant, um, event. I hope you all will take advantage of, of participating in
• public hearing in front of the public, uh, the planning commission, which would've happened anyway, and we will
• 13 additional, uh, appointees on the planning commission. So it's a, it's a heavy burden to find that date
• program. And we received unanimous support from the Planning commission following, uh, the meetings that we've had with neighbors
• which took place after the planning commission. We are offering several additional community benefits and voluntary site
• ground on this zoning ground. Um, even though the planning commission, by the way, unanimously approve this rezoning
• six nmp on the eastern portion of the track. The planning commission and staff recommend this request. The rezoning
• mitigation that again, that signed and ready to recorded Planning Commission recommended that or request unanimously. And staff is
• not apparently get to the Planning Commission. So their recommendations do not represent, uh, some very important issues

Sound Search™

• plan, and then on July 25th of this year, the planning commission approved the P Palm District Plan and council has
• to get a presentation of the Palm District Plan before it went to planning commission. It went to planning Commission, now

Sound Search™

• Order of the Zoning and Planning Commission. It is Tuesday, September 19th, 2023 at 6 0 1. Public communication, having none. Is there anybody in the

Sound Search™

• , an ordinance relating to a joint public hearing between the city council and the Planning commission, uh, for certain changes to
• was expressed by colleagues that we'd be having this joint meeting, and then there would also be a planning commission meeting, and
• the planning Commission. After that public hearing, hearing happens, the planning commission will take up the item at one of their
• notice of the planning commission and the council meetings. And so in this instance, we would give notice of all three at one
• time. So we would have the, uh, joint hearing, the planning commission action day, and the council action date. Okay. Um, thank
• this process out and see how it works for the council and for the planning commission in the community. And, um, if council
• , a joint hearing with the planning commission is something that we've never done in my time on council, and I can't remember
• we also need to work with the liaison for the Planning commission to, uh, determine the correct date. Okay. So we're, so
• , if the ordinance passes right, then we'll sit down with the clerk's office and the agenda office and the planning commission liaison
• culminated in presentation of a draft plan, um, at a public hearing of the Planning Commission on November 15th, 2022. We previously
• engagement focused primarily on Red River venue owners, um, and provided recommendations to planning commission. Next slide, please. Oh
• planning commission recommended amendments, version two of Exhibit A would adopt the plan with planning commission recommendations as
• many of the recommendations that are included in, um, exhibit A that were forwarded by the Planning Commission Working Group
• council member Fuentes mentions many, um, folks on the diocese were not there on November 29th of last year. Um, planning
• commission approved the Palm District, uh, plan with recommendations on July 25th after appointing a working group that conducted additional

Sound Search™

• their best game to the planning commission hearing more than seven weeks ago when they first learned of the
• of the, uh, planning commission, the city planner said that they fulfill a criteria, fact-based criteria about the
• , uh, planning commission, and this is all recorded, that he has bail, uh, infrastructure. So we would like to
• move forward with the conversation on the approval that we've already received from the planning commission and give
• planning commission and it is allowing for 550 feet of an indoor only auto sales use. Um, and again, we're
• proposed road stop. Um, this was supported by staff and the planning commission. So again, this is being offered for
• , the planning commission approved the applicant's request for C SS M U C O MP zoning with an additional
• through the c u p, the conditional use permit process, the DI idea was to ensure that the Planning
• Commission would see the site, um, to make sure that it was compatible with the area. So the applicant does not