|
Historic Landmark
|
Jan 10, 2024
|
Video
Agenda
|
|
Sound Search™
|
|
Planning Commission
|
Jan 09, 2024
|
Video
Agenda
|
|
Sound Search™
- was previously recommended by the Planning Commission. And this is a, um, we're redoing the item based on some notice
- back on your agenda. On November 14th of last year, this case was approved unanimously by the Planning Commission and
- forwarded to council, and has been postponed at the council, uh, pending a recommendation from the planning commission. This is
- the planning commission. And if you could clarify that and perhaps add some detail, it would be appreciated. Thank
- Planning commission for a recommendation because it's a rezoning and the code requires a recommendation by the Planning
- . So it does require a recommendation from the Planning Commission And the difference between the two zonings, the
- that's in the works and will be coming to the Planning commission for a recommendation later this year. That
- that make the ultimate decisions, but it's gotta come through here first. And so involve this planning commission when
- to the Planning Commission and determine whether or not TOD gateway is more beneficial to Austin's density goals. That's
- planning commission, but not as a condition of the approval. That's correct. Purely advisory Vice Chair, chair. I, I
- of those were already dispensed by the Planning Commission and the council last year. The three pending of that
- , um, provided for planning commission recommendation. Are we able To, so, um, are We able to ask questions? Sorry
- and Planning Commission members. My name is Spencer Schumacher. Um, I'm the Urban Transportation Commission member who usually
- , thank you for taking the time to come and speak to us here at Planning Commission. And I think what
- hear from marginalized communities, communities that don't historically engage with the planning commission, and how we can
- planning commission. And I just would like to see as, because of the, some of the discussion that came
- that historically have not engaged with the planning commission. So that was the thought. Um, that was the
- , are coming up to the planning commission. Well, thank you for that description and because when you talk about
- that we Postpone the election for Parliamentarian position For the planning commission to our next meeting? I'll go
- district has already been approved by council that was approved last October with full support of the planning
- commission. This is now coming to rezone change the zoning from CMU to CMU midway. So we cannot do a
- confused about, if this has to be done by council action, what, why is it coming to the Planning
- Commission If I may? Madam Chair? Yes, Ms. Ruly, and please go ahead. Okay, thank you. This is coming to the
- Commission to the city council when rezoning any property within its jurisdiction. And, and we did this before
- , going over those changes just so it's clear on what was changed, um, and that's what, uh, the planning
- commission would be, uh, recommending tonight. I'm having a, a little bit of trouble hearing the, the sound here
|
|
Board of Adjustment
|
Jan 08, 2024
|
Video
Agenda
|
|
Sound Search™
|
|
Planning Commission
|
Dec 19, 2023
|
Video
Agenda
|
|
Sound Search™
|
|
City Council Meetings
|
Dec 14, 2023
|
Video
Agenda
|
|
Sound Search™
|
|
Historic Landmark
|
Dec 13, 2023
|
Video
Agenda
|
|
Sound Search™
- the planning commission or the council, or both. So the, the path is not favorable. And as I will remind
- ago that planning commission approved. So, uh, I, I don't think it's, it's, it's that far off. It's a
- and, um, and send up to planning commission and to council. Uh, we didn't get there 'cause of, uh
- any individual here could, um, send the letter to planning commission or to council. And, you know, it
|
|
Planning Commission
|
Dec 12, 2023
|
Video
Agenda
|
|
Item(s)
|
|
Sound Search™
- everyone. Let's see. Um, we have a quorum present, so I'm going to call this meeting of the planning commission to order
- meeting on October 24th and the special called October 26th, joint City Council and Planning Commission meetings. The meeting the
- just pass our Urban Trails plan, which we reviewed here at Planning Commission, and I think there's huge enthusiasm
- and planning commission, I think is critical. So I really hope that we can see a good resolution with these
- applicant is requesting C-S-M-U-V-C-O-N-P. This case was heard at the last Planning commission on November 28th. And as a
- motion also include that we send a memo to council from the planning commission with the following paragraph, which
- following, while the planning commission recommends this case, we do not recommend allowing or encouraging this project to
- their concerns. And this was submitted to the planning commission as late backup. Jonathan Tomko with the planning
- , and to provide recommendations to be considered by the planning commission. So, uh, commissioner Azar, commissioner
- , uh, planning commission. Of course, it might be that the working group comes back with no recommendation at
- push for the purview of the planning commission to make feedback, uh, on like HR policies. And so
- , um, charter that, uh, charges the, um, planning commission as one of its task. Um, commissioner Cox, to
- within the domain of the planning commission. That is my understanding of course. And we can consult
- opposite. Um, uh, not the planning commission extending, it's, it's, it's, it's, uh, um, purview or range
- of influence, but actually the planning commission having the purview and range of influence that has been
- communities, both at the pc, the planning Commission, and both at City Council, uh, because they were held
- about how we, uh, conduct ourselves, the transparency we have. Are we going to be a planning commission that
- , um, I wanna make sure that we as a planning commission are doing our due diligence and providing
- from the law department, um, try to be brief, um, but this will hopefully clarify the duties of the planning
- commission for the public staff and commissioners. Um, this information is offered as a courtesy to alleviate concerns and is
- for these efforts in the community. So making sure that we're helping that process as a work in planning
|
|
Community Development Commission
|
Dec 12, 2023
|
Video
Agenda
|
|
Sound Search™
|
|
Design
|
Dec 11, 2023
|
Video
Agenda
|
|
Sound Search™
|
|
Board of Adjustment
|
Dec 11, 2023
|
Video
Agenda
|
|
Sound Search™
- don't. It is, It is. Let me, let me talk to a couple folks about it on planning commission and
- a, there's a couple folks on planning commission who are on the joint codes and ordinances and I'll
- would be a code amendment on our, our very, very, very, very outdated archaic Euclidean code Planning
- Commission. Okay, well so pardon me. I I I could uh, No, don't, just don't, Just don't, Just
- conversation, a further conversation with residential inspections, um, as opposed to code language that'll then go planning
- commission council like that we might not see for two years. Yeah. When we could actually just ask
|