Sound Search™

• another version anticipated before you go to council. Um, we are going to, um, planning commission, zoning and planning
• commission, environmental commission, design commission and, and downtown commission. And, and so, you know, we're interested in everybody's

Sound Search™

• , that was not even disclosed to the environmental commission or the planning commission, and that's the reduction of the
• to 60%. That's a doubling a hundred percent increase. Not even mentioned in the environmental commission or the planning
• commission for that matter. Maybe planning commission has discussed it. Y'all haven't even there. And there's about six or eight
• which things came from the planning commission in that draft. Which things came from, uh, uh, uh, the amendments
• slide please. On this slide, we, uh, speak to the various items that planning commission and, uh, city council
• planning commission number 14, planning commission number 21, and, uh, council member Togo's, uh, item had reflect different
• got it down as low as we Could. So was there, was there an amendment that was offered by planning commission that
• through this to try to ascertain if there were amendments that were added by the Planning commission or by
• a change suggested by the Planning Commission. Uh, these are requirements for, uh, rental units and affordable owner
• something on the bottom of page 14 of 22 that was also blocked in by red. Also a planning commission, uh
• a, a planning commission member regarding, um, specifically nighttime lighting and the bats and the, uh, possibility that
• that doesn't exist. Yes. I think there were two bad issues that came outta the planning commission. One was the
• , this issue was, uh, uh, came up at the planning commission as a part of their motion to, um, um, make
• staff recommendation plus the, um, proposed amendment from planning commission and otherwise that were acceptable to the
• Parkland. So are you, Thank you very much for the Planning Commission languages in Green. Yes, sir. Okay. Mr
• Parkland requirement is triggered. And that's, we, we disagree with the planning commission recommendation. I understand that
• . So do you want address, If, if so I can clarify. Staff recommendation was the northernmost buildings Correct. Planning
• commission added on the nine year deal. That's not your recommendation, correct? Not our original Recommendation. But you

Sound Search™

• , that the planning commission has recommended, or that, uh, council member tobo, uh, uh, I believe has asked for, and that the
• think I'll just backtrack. You know, the planning commission made some amendment, I mean the developer brought forward the proposal
• , the planning commission made some amendments that also embraced some of the parks and recreation board amendments, and then we
• on first reading with, you know, the planning commission amendments and I believe was a, a handful of your amendments
• this is staff recommendation plus planning commission, uh, uh, recommendations that were agreed to by the developer plus council member
• things that the applicant agrees to that were planning commission recommendations and were things that council member Tovo had
• planning commission or proposed by Kathy and were agreed to. It's just a way to get us past the things we don't
• members or to the planning commission or to the park sport. So, I mean, we, we have, I think we shouldn't overlook
• you said would re reviewing at the downtown commission, The planning commission was it? Or, or the community development
• we've received a, a memo on that. I think Planning Commission is considering it, uh, this, uh, this week. All
• through 20 quick or 20 or 25 quick amendments, uh, that are in agreement, that were things that were planning
• commission voted on, that we all approve things that you proposed, that we all approve. We could do those 20 before we

Sound Search™

• I am bringing this meeting of the planning commission to order, uh, September 27th, 2022, and it is 6:18 PM Uh, we will start with a roll
• , we were talking about postpone, but just in terms of the postponement, um, the planning commission had made some very
• cases before the planning commission today, because the applicant submitted a demolition application for the property are Land
• being on the Planning Commission. Um, it's a tough job. My name is Eila Fy. I'm a neighbor of the property at
• , how do we, as a planning commission, shouldn't we be evaluating this on the historic value of this property and
• if, if they bring it before the planning commission. You don't have to prove a hardship, you just have
• , similar, we have a recommendation from Zoning and Planning Commission. Um, they had um, some suggestions that we're
• planning commission wants, so that we can get that information into our, uh, staff report this week, if possible, and
• in one of our backups for planning commission, correct? I believe so, yes. Okay. Just just wanted to confirm
• to waive planning commission to review. Okay. So they would've to take action. Okay. All right. Just as clear
• of our motion to forward the CMU changes to planning commission with the clarity for staff to make sure that
• the posting at the time of planning commission would allow us the ability to fix that issue with dod
• group. Yeah. To present to the planning commission. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Are we clear on that? Public Engagement? Yeah
• . Okay. It's 10 45 and I'm aduring this meeting at the Planning Commission. Thank you very much. I won't have

Sound Search™

• chair. Thank you. Yes. Commissioner is not, not only the members of the planning commission, but also any commissioners that wish to
• can accept that by consensus if you so wish. But you also had two members of the planning commission who had

Sound Search™

• that we'll be bringing forward. So, um, that's more or less where we are at. We will be going to the planning commission on
• finalized, um, which should be this week. And also give us time to consider the, uh, recommendations from planning commission and, um
• to read, um, the, uh, zoning and planning, planning, commission, um, resolution that they sent forward. I'd like to read
• planning commission encourage the Austin city council to approve C 20, uh, 2022 dash 0 0 5, a land development code
• , of things to move it forward to planning commission, and then to, to counsel. Um, I, I, I know we have a
• you wanna call it cheating. That's what I've been doing. I have been watching the planning commission meetings, zoning and
• the zoning and planning commission recommendation. It talked about the urban watershed, but so much development is also occurring
• will go to planning commission next week. Their recommendation goes to is what formally goes to the city council fo
• . So for any code changes, planning commission is the body that makes the official recommendation. Of course, of course, council
• will also want to hear from environmental commission and zoning and planning commission. So, um, so, you know, you could
• we came out of today with, with a motion that the planning commission could, could, could hear, but, you know, from us
• add something. Um, I'd like the way that zoning and planning commission, uh, created a phase two section, and what I
• housing projects within the desired development zone. And then what's in the first bullet of the zoning and planning commission, which

Sound Search™

• the planning commission and zoning and planning commission joint meeting on August 30th, 2022. That's a, that's going to be a consent
• item. Number two minutes from the zoning and planning commission meeting on September 6th, 2022, a a consent item, public hearings item three
• . Okay. So the consent, it are items one minutes from the planning commission and zoning and planning commission joint meeting on
• August 30th, 2022 item two minutes from the zoning and planning commission meeting on September 6th, 2022, item three C 14 20 22 0 0 3 9. That's peaceful
• question from the commission? Okay. Thank you. E of zing and planning commission. I am Wendy rose and I'm filling in for
• zoning and planning commission for a review or will it be an administrative a review? Uh, it, it could be if, if
• planning commission. We've been to y'all once as well. We don't have a, a recommendation from anyone yet. We're going
• not be hearing this until when again, Um, we will be postponing it until October 13th. Um, planning commission will be
• capacity to come to a third zoning and planning commission meeting, uh, and our strong preference would be action tonight
• resolved that the zoning and planning commission encourages the city of Austin to approve C 20, 20, 22 5 a land development code

Sound Search™

• the planning commission and zoning and planning commission joint meeting on August 30th, 2022. That's a, that's going to be a consent
• item. Number two minutes from the zoning and planning commission meeting on September 6th, 2022, a a consent item, public hearings item three
• . Okay. So the consent, it are items one minutes from the planning commission and zoning and planning commission joint meeting on
• August 30th, 2022 item two minutes from the zoning and planning commission meeting on September 6th, 2022, item three C 14 20 22 0 0 3 9. That's peaceful
• question from the commission? Okay. Thank you. E of zing and planning commission. I am Wendy rose and I'm filling in for
• zoning and planning commission for a review or will it be an administrative a review? Uh, it, it could be if, if
• planning commission. We've been to y'all once as well. We don't have a, a recommendation from anyone yet. We're going
• not be hearing this until when again, Um, we will be postponing it until October 13th. Um, planning commission will be
• capacity to come to a third zoning and planning commission meeting, uh, and our strong preference would be action tonight
• resolved that the zoning and planning commission encourages the city of Austin to approve C 20, 20, 22 5 a land development code

Sound Search™

• the planning and zoning commission, cuz the planning and zoning commission has done a great job in, or the planning and

Item(s)

• of City Code Sections 25-1-501 (Initiation of Amendment) and 25-1-502 (Amendment; Review) related to PlanningCommission review and public hearing requirements and providing direction regarding administrative rules

Sound Search™

• concurrent from the urban renewal board planning commission, uh, Austin revitalization authority, a unilateral action was taken
• then end up before a vote at our planning commission. And if anyone doesn't like those results, they can appeal
• planning commission, um, this to try to find a solution, um, that worked and I thought I had one, which
• know, is that the applicant can go and appeal to the planning commission, um, in those instances. And then I
• that, you know, offering the opportunity to go before the planning commission in those few instances where, um