Sound Search™

• The time is six 19. Um, and, uh, we are now adjourning the joint meeting of the planning commission and zoning and planning commission here
• good. Okay. Now for a zoning, uh, planning commission, we'll start with, uh, just an order. I seat here, Mr. Greenberg. Oh, not
• that your, okay, so that's a, we have a planning commission and some of you planning, we have quorums. Um, let's go ahead
• the planning and zoning and planning commission lost the love of her life. Jack Goodman last Tuesday, Jack was a leader in his
• , um, chair that at a Ramirez mirrors, but the, uh, planning commission can remain, uh, we don't need to leave. Uh
• , and verse. So what will happen is once planning commission loses Corum, um, the members can proceed to, um, uh, to
• , Commissioner moose taller Here, Commissioner Shea, and I have, um, commissioner Thompson and, uh, let's see. Thank you everybody from planning
• commission. Think so. Um, and we may have commissioner Flores joining us later. Oh, commissioner Anderson Here. Okay. Thank you. Oh, we're doing really

Item(s)

• of City Code Sections 25-1-501 (Initiation of Amendment) and 25-1-502 (Amendment; Review) related to PlanningCommission review and public hearing requirements and providing direction regarding administrative rules

Sound Search™

• , um, and then early November to planning commission for their recommendations on the draft plan. And then the early December
• plan goes back away. Actually, I think it was a planning commission when that was first presented, you know, 2014
• addition of the planning commission recommendations of which there were, I believe about 23 of them, if I recall correctly
• , plus the planning commission amendments plus council member, television members. Okay. Thank you, mayor, if you come back to me
• , I believe it was the planning commission that talked about an entirely different number. And so I guess my point was
• was a planning commission we passed. I think the motion on the table was planning commission's recommendation with these
• intent that those amendments substituted in for any relevant planning commission amendments. So in the same way, the planning
• commission made, made their motion and modified the staff recommendation. And that way the amendments modified the planning commission recommendations
• that approach, as opposed to what I think, I believe what we incorporated was simply planning commission plus city
• intended to modify planning commission. So, which is, I guess I thought the way we sort of always handled zoning yeah
• planning commission motion, whatever the council passed is the final word on, on where we are at the moment. Yeah. I
• precise. I thought that what we voted on was planning commission and then amended on top of it, what council member
• that, um, were asked for by the planning commission as well as by, uh, the city council. Um, specifically
• , to adhere to some of the other affordability requests from those, from the planning commission, as well as the
• it to the planning commission. There was, uh, some delays and then beginning a chance to meet they've given
• suggestions coming from the Parkland from a planning commission are going to be involved in probably more than we
• the stakeholders in that process, some people in the planning commission, uh, it seemed as if, if we could
• the other kinds of outstanding questions. The other questions that came up from the planning commission, except for
• , represent the work of the planning commission, uh, if there are those, because incorporate them, if not, then

Sound Search™

• . So it will be suitable for this parking ride, uh, progress. And that action has been advanced from these zoning and planning
• commission favorably to the city council. And it will be on, uh, an agenda with the city council in September. Here's the

Item(s)

• Discuss and consider establishing a working group tasked with proposing amendments for Planning Commission

Sound Search™

• Right. Uh, this is, I'm bringing this meeting of the planning commission to order at, uh, 6:24 PM, August 23rd, 2022. Um, we're going to go
• minutes and please be back promptly. Thank you. And the planning commission back to order at 6:54 PM apologized solid folks out there. Um
• , additional input, uh, to the planning commission. And I kept checking the agenda for the 23rd and I was told it
• months and have already appeared on three landmark commission agendas. And now on two planning commission agendas, we had prior
• postponements on May 4th at the landmark commission and on August 9th at the planning commission by staff also in staff can
• probably speak to this better than I can, but I think that planning commission postponed a bunch of discussion cases
• was a planning commission postponement, and it was basically a consent agenda only made maiden. Oh, right. Okay. Thank you
• zoning in 2012. However, the application was withdrawn. The applicant prior to planning commission, um, due to public opposition to
• I feel like as the planning commission, we should be making these decisions based on planning principles and based on
• pretty cool. There is a lot of history here. One of the things I look for at least as a planning commission member
• done before we come back to you, uh, for the next planning commission, uh, date that will be listed for we'll
• a working group tests with proposing amendments for planning commission consideration regarding title 25 of the city code relating
• would be a good idea to have a briefing tonight, uh, planning commission on this item so that we weren't hearing it
• the last process that we went through, the, the Parkland commercial, Parkland, dedication, um, updates that planning commission could
• journey in this meeting? Okay. Uh, uh, we turn the planning commission meeting at 9:27 PM. Thank you.

Sound Search™

• is after rereading multiple documents and the synopsis of other meetings, having watched the planning commission meeting twice, um
• that you have here came from the planning commission. I don't want to say that for sure. I have to go back
• conditions of the park and recreation board, the environmental board and the planning commission. We again recommend more visible
• that the environmental board brought up, that the planning commission brought up. They're not all addressed yet and the

Sound Search™

• . It would go to planning commission. As I read the code there, the code does not give you specifics on what
• review by the environmental commission. And then that recommendation has passed on the planning commission. Uh, I'm happy to answer
• plan review and the water various departments would be looking at that. Um, and this would go to planning
• commission and city council, um, from a traffic perspective. Yes, we did study that with the staff, uh, for

Sound Search™

• Go. But there's some details since we just got the planning commission on the ninth and some things that we

Sound Search™

• Since I will now call the meeting of the zoning and planning commission to order it is 6:01 PM. Tuesday, the 16th of August. And I'll start
• planning commission back to order. Thank you, chair. Well now hear from Ms. Fernandez, Mr. Fernandez, you'll have five
• a planning commission is to think about appropriate planning. And Atlas 14 is an improvement over historic floodplain maps
• here where you say the zoning and planning commission encourages the city council to approve or to, you know
• of land development. That's the same now therefore be it resolved. The zoning and planning commission encourages is
• , I am. You are. Where, which language The now therefore be it resolved that the zoning and planning
• commission encourages city council to consider the following recommendations regarding the proposed flood, plain commercial redevelopment section

Item(s)

• Approve an ordinance waiving City Code Section 25-1-502 related to Planning Commission review of parkland

Sound Search™

• they were not able to make, uh, a recommendation, the planning commission spent several hours on this and appreciate their work. Um
• y'all just now have received them. Is that correct? If we can make sure those are posted to the planning commission website
• would suggest, so item two, we don't have to take up because we had the planning commission. I would suggest
• little bit of time, um, tomorrow and whatnot to digest what the planning commission proposed and to connect with

Sound Search™

• planning commission, um, seeing it tonight, that is an opportunity for us to, um, make sure that our workers have
• . We don't know what the planning commission is going to come tonight. So with tonight, so I don't want to
• we do that, I'm looking forward to the recommendations from the planning commission. In addition, I just want
• in the community, they can come testify, but just on that issue would also point out to the planning
• commission tonight, as on their agenda, the commercial Parkland dedication. I want to thank that body for meeting quickly