Sound Search™

• , Everybody. Uh, Rob Schneider, uh, planning commission representative, uh, on the District five, uh, planning commission appointee. Uh, back to
• much universally, the membership of Planning Commission is, uh, has an eye on, uh, adding affordable housing units and, um
• most interesting for the, um, for the jsc is, uh, the Brody Oaks pod, which, uh, the planning commission passed and
• don't think there was another one before that. Um, so the planning Commission approved that, and that's now the council

Sound Search™

• materials? And I'm not sure if that's the liaison when it comes to planning commission and zoning and planning commission, or
• placed on site. Um, that was one of the recommendations that came out of the planning commission, and we
• Landmark Commission City staff reviewed by City Legal, a majority of the planning commission. We kindly ask that you
• reading only, right? For the planning commission recommendation, correct. The applicants were able to that, yes. And I
• just want, since this is my, I guess last or second last, But wait a minute. Planning commission recommendation
• the recommendation number two from the planning commission was not accepted. So that's not included, right? Correct. It
• add too, again, since this is my last case that includes Amendment six from the planning commission, which is

Sound Search™

• two year period? And then he comes to a meeting like today, and the next one at the planning commission on
• the Planning Commission. Um, and I'd be interested to know also where the water's exactly going to go once it

Sound Search™

• I've got six o'clock. So we will uh, begin the zoning and planning commission. Uh, this is Tuesday, December 6th. We're convening at six o'clock
• , discussion to and possible action to amend adopting zoning and planning commission 2023 scheduled. We adopted this last week but there is
• follow along, they get notified of a change, they come and participate here, uh, with this commission or the planning
• that particular Code Amendment affected, you know, the whole city and, and yet, you know, the zoning and planning commission, which
• more of it than the Planning Commission does, and yet we kind of get here on the back end of the process on
• . And not solely to the Planning commission only, not just to the Planning commission. I respect the, the Planning commission and
• can say Nadia. Um, I think that's an issue with the code, right? Right. So exactly the planning commission is seen as
• to do with how Zco and Planning commission were originally created and the shot clocks thrown all that out. But
• commission. Um, they understand a project to be three stories high. But then it sounds like to me it's site planning

Item(s)

• Staff Recommendation and Planning Commission Recommendation: To grant termination of a public Restrictive

Sound Search™

• to take into consideration and comments from ULI staff and planning commission to meaningfully change our compatibility rules to
• housing in the city. I hope that you take the recommendations from the planning commission and staff on these items
• adopt the Planning Commission recommendations on item 55 and 56. And the reason is simple. And I read from the
• work next year to get us out of it. Please vote in favor of the Planning Commission recommendations. Thank you
• . The current language ignores the planning commission vote to recommend including the existing red line as a light rail corridor
• to that end, I asked you to support the planning commission recommendation for item number 56 amendments to compatibility
• , because you still have problems. We still have to take cases to the board of adjustment or the planning commission for
• , and I just don't understand how we had, uh, voting on the same day as planning commission with conversations that
• unanimous support of the Historical Commission, a review by city's attorneys and the Planning and zoning commission. We

Sound Search™

• the compatibility, uh, issues. 55, 56, what did I say? Okay. Thank you. 55 and 56, um, planning commission, uh, hopped on this
• my notes on that as I've done in the past on things which will list the planning commission, uh, amendments and, and, and
• that the planning commission, uh, raised, um, that, uh, will, will address. A lot of those I think are not going to be
• opportunity as part of this discussion on Thursday as teed up by the Planning Commission to, uh, at least discuss
• corridors in West Austin. Um, and um, I, I have heard planning commission, I think members of council talk about that
• the plan be adopted as an amendment to imagine Austin, which requires that the planning commission first take action on the
• District Plan that was originally scheduled for this Thursday to February 23rd, um, in order to allow planning commission action, we
• and opportunities in the district. Next slide. And next. We presented the plan to the planning commission at their special
• until December 20th, because the December 20th planning commission meeting is a consent only meeting. We anticipate that the Planning Commission will
• to allow time for the planning commission to take their action. Once the plan is adopted, staff would work on
• postponed the hearing that had been scheduled for Thursday to the February 23rd meeting to allow time for planning commission to
• take action at the February meeting. We would then be asking, assuming that Planning commission takes that action, would be
• front facing, uh mm-hmm. analysis for the lots mm-hmm. , you know, both from my time on on planning
• commission and, and here, uh, at council, you know, frequently folks are, um, combining lots on these large, uh, you know
• consider the plan and take action at a meeting in January. Under Article 10 of the City Charter Planning
• Commission is required to take action on any recommended amendments to the comprehensive plan, which this plan is. Um, we are

Item(s)

• Discussion and possible action to approve the 2023 Planning Commission meeting calendar.

Sound Search™

• It is, uh, five 11. And, um, I'm bringing this, uh, meeting of the planning commission to order. Um, this is the November 15th meeting, and
• the Planning Commission. It is 6:27 PM and, uh, we had, when we left, we had just passed a consent agenda. And we're
• the planning commission and asking for amendments to the sos um, ordinance or, or anything else. We want it to be
• use within what they're proposing. We're not doing site plan here at Planning Commission, so I think that can be
• this come from the communities you continue to make vulnerable. You the planning Commission can make recommendations, reach out
• presentation from staff Stevie Greathouse Housing and Planning Department. Good evening chair. Members of Planning Commission. Um, I've
• . Next. And tonight we're asking that the planning commission take action to recommend that the Palm District Plan be
• busy with these other items and perhaps, and, you know, we have a limited planning commission here this evening. It
• , um, and I, I, I would like to speak to my motion afterwards. Okay. I'm going to motion that Planning
• commission does not grant this superiority. All right. Does that, um, okay. Uh, does, so that would be not approving the
• . All right. And, um, if there's no opposition, I'm gonna go ahead and adjourn this meeting at the planning
• commission. It is 10 54 just in time. Thank you. Six is the Oh. Cause you could look in and is, I

Sound Search™

• the Historic Landmark Commission. The planning Commission Zoning and Planning commission, downtown Commission and design commission there before
• of the multiple city departments review by a minimum the Environmental Commission, planning Commission. And finally back to council

Sound Search™

• that they could prepare For it. Yeah. So we were at planning commission this week, but we got postponed to next
• week on the 15th. And we'll be at zoning and planning commission for a briefing and possible action on the 6th of
• , uh, market rate and affordable housing Studies that the planning commission and zoning and planning Commission have done over
• that done for planning commission next week, uh, Tuesday. Um, so no, no numbers today on the impact on properties, but
• planning commission. Uh, we were there on Tuesday and they, they heard from the public, they heard a staff recommendation
• to the planning commission or are y'all waiting for, for some action from, from, uh, the planning commission. Uh, we're
• not necessarily waiting on action from planning commission. The planning commission obviously. Um, well, I don't know what they'll
• do, but they'll, I'm assuming they'll take action of some kind. If planning commission did postpone this item into the
• that Planning Commission is gonna be moving this forward and that, um, this was unanimously approved by council. Um, it
• waiting to see, you know, what the Planning commission recommends and if there are tweaks that we need to make to
• , this has been to the codes and ordinances joint committee. It was recommended there, it was at the planning commission on
• went back to planning commission on Tuesday of this week. Planning commission voted and they adopted the item with
• recommendations. Um, Planning commission had a working group and they also had a number of amendments from that working group that
• that was one of the reasons why I, I asked that question And there was some discussion at planning commission as to
• as the work that the planning commission did recently, could you daylight what some of the topics are that they're

Sound Search™

• Planning commission, uh, the November 8th meeting, 2022 to order at 6:10 PM Uh, we'll start with, um, roll call, and I'm gonna go with the
• notice of a planning commission public hearing for November 8th, 2022, and for the city council on December 1st, 2022 for parking standards
• because what is not on the Planning commission agenda or the council agenda is a requirement that these commercial sites comply
• amendment at the planning commission and council meetings. And I know when you'll get to that later in the meeting, you'll get
• the Planning Commission, but certainly not with, and before any of y'all, uh, public communication. I wish I could show this
• done fairly and open to each and every person. Today at tonight's planning commission has agreed, has, has angered and concerned
• lots of Austin voters by holding hearings Tonight, many are protecting runoff elections Planning Commission, and the city council is going
• Miss, this is Andrew VA onto the, uh, planning commission. Um, could you do me a favor and, uh, test your line
• meeting in the year following that November. Uh, is it similar for the planning commission? I didn't have a chance
• , I, I'm, we've, I've actually heard for the first time some really illuminating stuff about, um, the planning commission notification
• , but what are the steps? Is it going to come back to planning commission at all, or is this really, I mean
• is being asked of the com, the planning commission, if we take action, If you take action, it would be to
• environmental commission recommendations in our planning commission recommendation to counsel on this item. All right. I am
• , tables actually need to be fixed. So this is an issue that often comes up on planning commission as well
• feet. Transit forward supports the adoption of proposed compatibility changes being considered by the Austin Planning Commission and
• information being translatable, it's not the Planning Commission webpage is I change it to Spanish. You'll see, you know
• , the s So planning commission webpage, you see the agenda, the backdrop, uh, backups, their title all in Spanish
• the, uh, City Council and Planning Commission are trying to address the affordability crisis with Austin Homes. However
• neighborhoods. As the planning commission studied, how the proposed amendment will impact property values, traffic, parking, density
• for the planning commission to very clearly indicate that indeed there will be a, people will have the ability
• to provide us feedback on the 15th at planning commission. So it's very clear on the website. Yes. Thank you
• through a process, through the planning commission and the, the offices that I've spoken to basically have told me
• unless they get pressure from the public. I don't think pressure from the planning commission is going to do
• as planning commission, but I hope that those are comments that can be taken to council for sure. And
• planning commission could send a recommendation to council that they agree with city staff and that this should not
• get a report from staff just on the signup process, um, and how the signup process for planning commission differs
• no opposition, I'm looking around. I am going to turn this meeting at the planning commission at 10:54 PM Thank you. T Find A better Thingss to do Than To drags You.
• speakers. In our opinion, this amendment should be left up to all the city voters, not just the planning
• commission or city council. This amendment affects more than just the individual properties identified. It will impact whole