Sound Search™

• an updated plan to the Planning commission on November 8th and City Council on December 1st. Next slide, please. Throughout the
• Austin with a planning commission hearing scheduled for the November 8th and city council. As I said earlier on December 1st

Sound Search™

• Okay, it is six o'clock. I'm going to call this meeting of the zoning and planning commission to order. It is Tuesday, October 18th. Uh, first
• zoning and planning commission. Wait a second, wouldn't that be just leaving the zoning as is? Uh, right now it has

Item(s)

• Recommendation and Planning Commission Recommendation: To grant East Riverside Corridor
• Staff, Planning Commission, and Historic Landmark Commission Recommendations: To grant
• Staff Recommendation and Planning Commission

Sound Search™

• a postponement and, uh, the planning commission is recommended, um, kind of, uh, pulling out some of the items, uh
• the planning commission work group listening sessions, making clear we are opposing the proposed waiver of the planning commission review
• postponement while not postponing other parts. And I'm, uh, I'm reacting to in part the Planning Commission recommendations. So I'd
• , uh, that came through on Tuesday. That was our fourth, uh, time being posted for, for planning commission. Uh, so
• , for us to push. We wanna make sure we get that right. Another item, uh, that planning commission asked us to
• something that I believe has been well vetted, but that we could revisit. Uh, and so planning commission gave us tangible
• with making sure they had a comprehensive assessment on their end and I know Planning Commission just took it up
• the Planning commission recommendations to exclude Functional Green, the utility line component and, uh, the not to in disincentivize
• , and affordability. Uh, and I don't know that that was necessarily clear in the words that the planning commission used
• , or their deal. When, when it comes to the planning commission, the planning commission expressed some frustration. They said
• y'all, there has not been any additional notification as a part of that, um, except for obviously planning commission notice
• for taking it through the Environmental commission, the planning Commission. I know the discussions there have been very, very
• , I certainly think it needs to happen. Clarifying question for what Kato just asked, Planning commission recommended, and you're
• foot adding that. Uh, what did you do with the planning commission recommendation on the green storm order infrastructure
• where the planning commission said, develop recommendations that would seek to offset the impact and develop the cost sharing program
• infrastructure. The Planning Commission said develop, uh, offsets and develop a cost sharing program. But that hasn't happened yet
• us aligned with postponing the items that the planning commission had recommended postponing as, uh, which are the same items
• of us. Um, I, I respect people's interest in spending more time, but I trust our staff in the planning Commission to
• work that they've done with the Planning Commission to identify those items that require further consideration and discussion. So, um
• pieces that there was agreement from the planning commission, um, and that we were all comfortable with, which I understand
• of those discussions? Uh, per the planning commission recommendations, we had planned to roll those into phase two where
• to what Planning commission has raised there? I mean, we can make the motion do whatever. My goal is to make
• back on a shorter timeline. There's some key tangibles that planning commission and design commission asked for. Uh, that I
• . This project was approved by the planning commission without being provided any physical representation of a physical plan
• rebuild it. Um, this project was endorsed by the contact team and unanimously by the planning commission. Uh, I
• information been with us. The planning commission wanted to have that corresponding with us. And that's the action we've
• saw that again with things that were coming back to us today and planning commission last week, trying to do
• question that the planning commission was acting and has asked several times when things have come to them only to
• . Uh, the planning commission, uh, had an additional recommendation that, um, you regardless at at year nine, all
• it to you as soon as I can. Okay. So, as I understand that there were three that were recommended by planning
• commission on the dias, we're talking about potential fourth one mm-hmm. , the fifth one, the green storm water
• has also raised questions with respect to the, uh, green storm order infrastructure, which also had a recommendation from planning
• commission that, um, uh, offsets be addressed and a possible cost sharing program addressed. Could your motion also say, for
• if Mr. Bella does not request options with respect to the functional green that tries to take into account the planning
• commission inter will be asking for that. And it could be that there's not enough time to do that, which is
• that nine years, Correct, it occurs no matter what, whether Station station as it develops a property planning
• commission said, but in any event, you have to do it all in year nine, correct? Applicant. Do you wanna address

Sound Search™

• Connect local funding to acquire this property. And the, uh, city, uh, uh, planning and zoning commission has already, uh, uh

Sound Search™

• Um, Let's go ahead. This is the October 11th, 2022 Planning commission meeting, and we're gonna, I'm gonna go ahead and bring this, uh
• . Isn't the planning commission supposed to be sticking up for old Austin? Those of us who can't afford to lose our
• that the planning Commission think about the owners who chose to live at the Westgate because it's what they could afford
• . I ask the planning commission to think about the owners who have dedicated the time and money in preserving the
• this planning commission to do, to do that? We can zone a footprint, historic within a parcel. We can zone a
• , did not get the sufficient vote on the planning commission to move ahead. I feel like there's a lot to argue in
• . Thank You. Bringing this, uh, planning commission, meaning back to order, we have a quorum present, and the next item
• thought about society comes before the Planning Commission today to urge your support for the immediate adoption of the
• share with the rest of the planning commission, uh, the vice chair is shared with the working group, um, the design
• . So with the holiday makeup dates, um, that's almost like a double up meeting with the zoning planning commission. So
• at 5:00 PM we will be planning commission followed by Z Planning Commission at 6:00 PM Got it. So the
• functional green sub item contained in 25 dash eight dash sub C for staff to provide the following to the planning
• commission. Um, we're looking at providing some results from additional community engagement, working with staff to understand the

Sound Search™

• , we, we gave it a, a unanimous vote, uh, planning commission was six three. And it was specific, one of

Sound Search™

• just environmental commission, but, uh, zoning and planning commission, planning commission, home Builders Association, et cetera, that this

Sound Search™

• Meeting of the, uh, zoning and planning commission to order. It is Tuesday, October 4th, and the first thing I'm going to do is call roll
• others thought about perhaps bringing it to the Planning Commission, um, as an item, whether I present it and maybe a
• just, you know, I know it was sent on to council, but I thought that since the Planning commission is another body
• Joint Committee. Okay. And then, um, two members from the planning commission, uh, should they choose, can place it on

Sound Search™

• another version anticipated before you go to council. Um, we are going to, um, planning commission, zoning and planning
• commission, environmental commission, design commission and, and downtown commission. And, and so, you know, we're interested in everybody's

Sound Search™

• , that was not even disclosed to the environmental commission or the planning commission, and that's the reduction of the
• to 60%. That's a doubling a hundred percent increase. Not even mentioned in the environmental commission or the planning
• commission for that matter. Maybe planning commission has discussed it. Y'all haven't even there. And there's about six or eight
• which things came from the planning commission in that draft. Which things came from, uh, uh, uh, the amendments
• slide please. On this slide, we, uh, speak to the various items that planning commission and, uh, city council
• planning commission number 14, planning commission number 21, and, uh, council member Togo's, uh, item had reflect different
• got it down as low as we Could. So was there, was there an amendment that was offered by planning commission that
• through this to try to ascertain if there were amendments that were added by the Planning commission or by
• a change suggested by the Planning Commission. Uh, these are requirements for, uh, rental units and affordable owner
• something on the bottom of page 14 of 22 that was also blocked in by red. Also a planning commission, uh
• a, a planning commission member regarding, um, specifically nighttime lighting and the bats and the, uh, possibility that
• that doesn't exist. Yes. I think there were two bad issues that came outta the planning commission. One was the
• , this issue was, uh, uh, came up at the planning commission as a part of their motion to, um, um, make
• staff recommendation plus the, um, proposed amendment from planning commission and otherwise that were acceptable to the
• Parkland. So are you, Thank you very much for the Planning Commission languages in Green. Yes, sir. Okay. Mr
• Parkland requirement is triggered. And that's, we, we disagree with the planning commission recommendation. I understand that
• . So do you want address, If, if so I can clarify. Staff recommendation was the northernmost buildings Correct. Planning
• commission added on the nine year deal. That's not your recommendation, correct? Not our original Recommendation. But you