Sound Search™

• You have the zoning and planning commission for the order? It is 6 0 1 on February 15th. And I'm going to start off with attendance. So

Sound Search™

• , you know, like the chair of the planning commission said there is a place for things. And I think city
• worked is that the assistant city manager contacted the chairs of the planning commission staff and the board of

Sound Search™

• think what requirements are we allowed to recommend for the zoning and planning commission? I would like to work in the
• their backup. That's just zap or planning commission. It's not, um, I mean, I'm pretty confident we can't, we can
• this recommendation before, like with the zoning and planning commission, and I think it's something that we need to see
• , for every case considered by the planning commission or zoning and planning commission. Well sort of, yeah, yeah. Um, which
• , you know, um, I would just say, you know, having watched a lot of city council planning commission means people come

Sound Search™

• Time is six so eight. And, um, I am bringing this, uh, meeting of the planning commission, um, January 25th, 2022 to order we have a
• item to be three. And before, um, this is from the applicant, the applicant would request any planning, commission approval
• , uh, hearing the Mr. Cantu requested a postponement. And, uh, at that hearing the planning commission, granted a postponement
• drafted until the planning commission makes their recommendations. And sometimes until the city council does first reading, because you
• end of that, it would be something like, um, working, uh, the planning commission. This would be an example of
• motion planning, commission supports, uh, this PUD, um, and as superior with, as staff recommends with the following planning
• planning commission, uh, votes to not recommend the PUD? And what happens if the planning commission votes to postpone this
• if the planning commission recommends denial of the pod, it would require a super majority of the city council to
• approve it. If the planning commission recommends the PUD with conditions, you know, be they staff recommendation or, you know
• plan. We unfortunately, as a planning commission did not have the benefit of that document in this process. I
• correct, and this allows a bit greater, more control for the planning commission to determine the finer items about
• of things here is, as I recall, the issues that were brought up are kind of outside the purview of this planning
• commission. I think there was a lot of discussion. It's very important, affordable housing, but there are a lot of
• commission amendments. So that would be kind of a baseline to start with, but, you know, there's other emotions sicko to be

Sound Search™

• has since, um, the case passed planning commission and went to music committee, uh, went to the city council. And

Item(s)

• Planning Commission Recommendation: To deny central business district - historic landmark (CBD-H) combining
• Planning Commission Recommendation: To deny central business district - historic landmark (CBD-H) combining

Sound Search™

• business district to central business district, historic landmark, combining district zoning, the planning commission recommends denial of the
• not that great. And couldn't be incorporated into a new building. Anyway, the planning commission voted to deny the eight

Sound Search™

• February 1st, 6:01 PM. I'm going to call this meeting the meeting of the zoning and planning commission to order first. I'm going to take the
• see it as slated for the planning commission, um, in March. And I was wondering if there was a timeline for

Sound Search™

• is that tiny commission zoning and planning commission and board of adjustments are people that volunteer their time to
• think the planning commission and the staff recommendation have given us a path for how to, how to amend the
• , we are proposing to change the zoning to MF six. And under that zoning, the planning commission has recommended
• approved as recommended by the planning commission to MF six C CEO. We have an executed private, restrictive covenant
• produced a compatible solutions that have gotten support from staff and the planning commission, uh, council member alter
• a site plan with base zoning tools, requiring a new Tia and another trip to planning commission for approval
• planning commission, uh, approval for the conditional use. So I don't think this is the end of the road on
• planning commission recommended increases as well. The ones that you'll see on my motion sheet go further than the
• planning commission and the staff recommendations. And so they are amending, they are keep retaining those properties
• planning commission and the staff have proposed, and that, that has involved lots of conversations and frankly
• would increase, I believe, beyond what was recommended by the staff and the planning commission. And then to back
• conversations landed, whether that was on planning commission and staff recommendation, or, uh, somewhere else. Mr. , would you
• venue space, I would still prefer to see it where planning commission had made that motion. And so I'm
• was backed by our music commission, our planning commission, you know, the king himself, Gary Clark, Jr. You know, those

Sound Search™

• council members that has already come up at the planning commission and they had concerns about affordable housing

Sound Search™

• All right. Um, it is 603 and I'm calling this a meeting of the planning commission, uh, January 25th, 2022. To order we have a quorum and
• , March 30th to add another planning commission meeting. If you, in the email, it kind of shows you all of the cases that
• to go ahead if I don't hear any objections, go ahead and, um, uh, closes meeting with the planning commission. Um, all
• we'll allow time for the working group to formulate amendments and then we'll, um, bring the action back for full planning
• commission action. Okay. So, um, but there w of course we can ask questions during that meeting, but any actions on the part