Sound Search™

• go to planning commission with the intention of going to a city council in July for adoption, hopefully. So two
• a new one. So, uh, got an update on that plan. Cool. Thank you. And so planning commission. Yeah. Um, the
• from a planning commission perspective and sorry, all my brain is turning too much right now, but, um, let's see. What
• can I share? Um, oh man. I mean, I think my honest, honestly, the planning commission in many ways, what we're
• comes through planning commission, but right now, um, I don't have much from my perspective, that's positive to share

Sound Search™

• potential issues. And finally, our requests postponement until the June 28th planning commission meeting that would give us time for
• silent. We face issues like this on a daily basis. At the last planning commission, I agreed to delay this case
• rezoning requests will come back to the community, to the planning commission and to the council for review and conversation
• , coming back to planning commission and ultimately the city council. And obviously the challenge here is you can only do
• not expecting to be first. Um, I was also trying to not ever come to a planning commission, but here we
• was on the planning commission griping about the cases that came up, um, th th it, it it's clear to me that
• developments that we as planning commission facilitate through our rezonings. And so I appreciate folks who came out today and want
• to let you all know that last planning commission we voted in favor of the old homestead BMU rezoning, which the
• that done here at planning commission and nearly every day I'm out with people experiencing homelessness. My father, um, is
• planning commission recommended elimination of all parking regulations in the city of Austin, as, as Buffalo and Bastrop
• coming to the planning commission and working with a contact team to come forward with a plan for that. So
• about building trust, but I also want to say we, we are the city's planning commission. It is our job
• area. This item was a discussion item at the April 12th planning commission meeting, and the applicant has made adjustments
• to their proposed site plan based on the feedback from the planning commission and the community at that
• , during this meeting of the planning commission. Thank you. Thank you all very much. All right. You over there
• for your consideration this evening. So to update you on where we are on the next slide, since our first planning
• commission meeting on May 10th, where postponement for two weeks was granted, we've been able to make some progress to
• so much. So, yes. Um, like I said before, I support this a hundred percent and while I've been on planning
• commission, um, whenever a deeply affordable, um, development like this comes through the vote has been unanimous in favor
• support and someone else on the phone, the, um, the affordability level will be at what you, the planning
• commission forwarded to the city council to amend the VI, to bring it down to 60% MFI. So we will be

Sound Search™

• presentation of the draft ordinance language to the planning commission and then tentatively July 28th, we'll do their presentation to
• ordinance at a tweet ordinance subcommittee and at the planning commission, but it's not going to be at the parks
• board to gain support of the cup. And if we gain support, then we will move forward to the planning commission and
• continue this process through planning commission and get an approval of the cup. Do you have any questions? All right. Thank
• the cup. However, it is the, um, planning commission, which is the sovereign board that will ultimately act on the
• commission with that recommendation. Let me go into planning commission. I do not have that information. Yeah, I think it's later
• , we're what, what's the parks board's role in approving these cups relative to planning commission and council? Yes. Uh, so, uh
• planning commission, uh, could view a non-action on the part of the parks and recreation board as a non vote, and
• that the cup would then go to, uh, the planning commission as a non vote to be acted on. So in the
• being brought forward to the Planning commission. But if the parks and recreation board does not want to vote to approve
• cup. So a, uh, vote to approve or reject the cup will still result in it being brought to the planning

Sound Search™

• this bonus program in July, 2021. The planning commission initiated changes to the affordability requirements in vertical mixed use
• on the planning commission recommendations, given the additional direction from city council, these two pieces of direction have
• is now reflecting the planning commission initiated changes, which was just in regards to the affordability levels in this program
• % of the median family income that is as the affordability level, other neighborhoods chose 80%. This planning commission direction

Sound Search™

• 10th, 2022 is recommended by the planning commission on 13 oh vote item. Number 69 is replaced, withdrawn and replaced with
• the past, uh, planning commission meeting, he called this a living document. Basically this amendment is a map with all
• summer and the planning commission, but get back to us in, in September so we can move forward if there's

Sound Search™

• , joint committee zoning and planning, planning commission, and eventually city council. And so with that, I would ask if you
• to planning commission on a five zero vote. Uh, we did move on to the planning commission on May 10th, uh, where
• planning commission. And so as I'm moving fast, You go to the next line. It's not working. The next one is

Sound Search™

• think folks will see a lot of echoes of what the planning commission had proposed with respect to compatibility, their
• it through the process, through the planning commission process, the same kind of way, bring that back to us, maybe
• the planning, you know, went through the environmental commission, the planning commission, and then of course, council up to the

Sound Search™

• have six zoning and planning commission members in attendance tonight, three virtually and three here on site. And I just have a concern

Sound Search™

• now needs equal time, at least two months to have its experts review materials and prepare for the planning commission. Is
• neighborhood how the postponement discussion would happen at the planning commission here eight tonight. And I said that there
• 24th planning commission here because of the applicant is opposed to any postponement beyond May 24th and the May 10th PC hearing
• planning commission members, um, Alice Glasgow representing JCI residential, the prospective developer of this site on April 12th. You
• want to frame that, you know, kind of the basis for our decisions here at the planning commission, is that something
• that you is dear to your heart and is in our planning commission area to pass onto codes, codes, and ordinances
• , let's do it. Let's give them a shot at it and bring it back to the planning commission. We can do things
• planning commission and then on May 9th is when we'll have a council public hearing followed by, um, council readings in June
• plan joint committee, um, this planning commission recommendation tonight, uh, the notification in the American statesman and community
• ASAP. And, uh, I'm sure, um, there'll be continued engagement from the planning commission on the transportation issues. Uh
• question is, um, who may initiate a code amendment council or the planning commission are the only entities that can
• All right. Um, folks, we're going to go ahead and get started. We have a quorum. Uh, this is the May 10th, 2022 meeting of the planning
• commission. And we're adjourning here at S uh, or bring this meeting to order at 6 0 6 And going to go and start with a roll call
• a response to Mr. Russo and we, we also provided that, uh, to chair and vice-chair of the planning
• commission, um, west gate is recommended in the adopted DSMP, um, for a corridor mobility study. Um, we do believe

Sound Search™

• know, we, we, uh, submitted our PR our objections to the planning commission. Few days later, we got a call from
• with notation that it would be for the, um, planning commission recommendation of and P um, there is
• request for MF six. Uh, staff recommended by three, the planning commission recommended about four and both the applicant
• . How many readings? Yes, the stem ed for NP is what the planning commission recommended, and the applicant has
• commission heard the case. The number one issue at the zoning planning commission was the CS one portion of the
• property of the request, uh, for the cocktail lounge or bar, uh, the zoning and planning commission was unable
• planning commission. She testified by telephone. She was rather upset. I actually wrote her a letter that letters in
• aware of any strong opposition. I wish I could have gotten one more vote at the planning commission. We
• recycling collection, kennels, outdoor entertainment, outdoor sports, and rec and service station. Uh, the zoning and planning