Sound Search™

• is that we don't have the ordinance in front of us. What we have, our planning commission recommendations, environmental
• would suggest making to the planning commission recommendations. The planning commission has done a really great job looking, taking
• . So, you know, as I approached this, I started from the planning commission recommendations and went from there. I would
• here in this plan, and I think it's going to be exciting and transformational. I think the planning commission has
• being asked to approve within our discretionary zoning abilities. I think it is part of the planning commission amendment to
• captured in the planning commission recommendation because they've picked up the recommendations from some of the other commissions, including

Sound Search™

• And I'm going to call this meeting of the zoning and planning commission to order. Um, did you have, okay, so first I'm going to take
• for review by the zoning and planning commission track. Two covers the warehouse building and is proposed for CSI zoning. This
• conditional use site plan application that is reviewed, has to be reviewed by the zoning and planning commission and their
• planning commission to get a recommendation from them based on, uh, the charter, uh, and early may, and then we'll
• actually been updated to April 28th. Uh, and we'll be going back to the planning commission for their recommendation in May 10th
• the final phase of the amendment process is, um, presenting to the planning commission for their, uh, recommendation, um, as
• , plan to the other commissions, to the planning commission, the other land use commission. So I think it'd be
• commissions. So I wonder if we could ask for zap to be included along with the planning commission, Are there

Sound Search™

• . That's a fast changing world over here at zoning and planning commission. Um, all right. Item one was moved or applied to
• and planning commission. I'm Jonathan so-to-speak with, Kimley-Horn representing the owner of the property. Um, if you can go
• good. Um, and then they talked about it, the following, uh, Tuesday at planning commission and I was listening
• 11 and I'm going to call this, um, zoning it, the having a quorum present. I'm going to call this meeting of the zoning and planning
• commission to order at six 11 on Tuesday, March 29th. First, I'm going to take roll, uh, commissioner Kosta, Presenter And me uh

Sound Search™

• and planning, commission zoning and planning commission, which are very closely related to the work of the landmark commission are
• meeting at city hall, along with the planning commission and the zoning and planning commission. Um, this gives kind of equal
• either at planning commission or city council and the points there, uh, in discussion that came up is that
• the month to consider whether to recommend if we do recommend, then it goes to the planning commission. There's
• to, but to the, or to the planning commission and passes there by super majority, then it goes to the
• then goes on to the planning commission. If we don't get nine votes, if there's anything shy of nine votes
• at that hearing, that's going to be the final hearing. It won't advance the planning commission at planning commission. Uh

Sound Search™

• required to notify to a much larger group of persons, including, uh, um, local emergency planning, commission, state, emergency

Sound Search™

• the way through the planning commission, which eventually did approve it, but it has several conditions. And I spoke
• , at the planning commission level is that there has become, uh, um, it's, they've made everybody aware that there
• , being able to fund this. Like the developer has now been told by the planning commission that they do

Item(s)

• Planning Commission Recommendation: To deny family residence-historic landmark-neighborhood plan (SF-

Sound Search™

• , uh, council and from planning commission, the imagine Austin and project connect, the Austin tree, strategic mobility plan
• case, being opposed by your neighbors and your case being opposed by the zoning and planning commission. My staff
• track to the planning commission, agreed with the, um, staff recommendation, um, and approved. Um, LRM you on track
• comments before planning commission were opposed to, uh, affordable housing, that, that they were against, uh, any affordable
• housing component before planning commission, uh, because of the idea that, you know, the people that would live there

Sound Search™

• , and last but not least falls church, Virginia planning commission, where he lives with his wife and three sons. So

Sound Search™

• Uh, maybe to order, um, so having a quorum, um, we'll go ahead and get this, uh, meeting of the planning commission started. Uh, the
• , before this planning commission meeting. Um, as I mentioned in the briefing last, uh, last meeting, there was some confusion
• got time, is could you help explain what other opportunities for public engagement there are if the planning commission decides
• public hearing at a planning commission. And then I remember correctly for council it's 16 days before a public hearing
• take this item through the planning commission as well, which has notification requirements. And so April 7th has been the
• , erroneous comments made about 11 days required when it's really 14 for the planning commission, the conflation of notification of
• it were postponed by planning commission council would likely have to note that postponement to a council meeting after
• the planning commission action. Um, and, and there wouldn't be required notification. That doesn't mean that there couldn't be
• into the May 10th planning commission meeting. All right. Do we have a second? Uh, let's see, uh, commissioner Shea, uh
• notified and to get in at the planning commission level. Um, and I think that trying to move forward with this
• current zoning is maintained because he has exactly what he purchased. We respectfully request that the planning commission deny the
• requires a conditional use permit, which is a type of site plan and is reviewed by the planning commission. Okay. And
• about here when staff says, well, this next property, that property adjacent planning commission approved geo just three months ago
• the case before you today is, um, responsive to code amendments that were initiated both by the planning commission act
• promote more equitable and inclusive outcomes for our community. These were also initiated by the planning commission at your
• that just mentioned that the planning commission and city councils are considering some unspecified land development. So change the
• . We'd like to spit in off the more, um, planning commission meetings. And we'd definitely like to have three hearings
• and planning commission. And that was 50 feet they want to build at 33 0 1 west William Cannon, 294 units turtle Creek
• is being proposed by the planning commission? How can you, how can the pen areas opt-in or opt-out of
• for others. We're reflecting on some of the cases that have come before planning commission and the past year
• rate. So that is not before the planning commission today, as staff is proposing it. If the fee-only option
• think the planning commission should go with future ordinance changes. I'm just a little curious about these kind of
• were not sure that it makes sense for the planning commission at this point, in relation to the ordinance we
• ordinance, uh, without kind of going through, you know, more rigorous, um, planning, commission codes. , you know, uh
• to respond to significant changes between a planning commission meeting and a council meeting. Um, I'm at, uh, well
• an initiative by the planning commission versus attaching recommendations to what I'm being told was a relatively narrow
• back as an ordinance us to adoption. So that is the one way that planning commission does impact the overall
• mechanism for us to actually do that. And as the planning commission, rather than just tell council, they should
• go to council, I want them to be clear and provide the consensus opinion of what the planning commission thinks
• and good way to have that discussion at the planning commission level. And so that's why I think, uh, it
• planning commission were a wake-up call for me in particular, the, uh, the case that was at south Lamar and
• direct the working group to develop a resolution that will identify issues where the planning commission asks for
• question? Sure. From staff, um, does the planning commission have the authority to create resolutions for staff work
• goes to the overall planning commission. I'm going to make a substitute motion that we go ahead and approve
• , Jay it's 11, 13 and of adjourning this, um, meeting of the planning Commission. Thanks everybody. That's the city
• right in. Okay. Thank you. Go ahead. I'll just make a motion that we postpone this item to the May 10th planning
• commission meeting. So I just wanna, uh, need a point of, uh, just on what that does, uh, Mr. Rivera, what, when
• in July of 2021 as, as city council in 2022, and then additional code amendments that were initiated. I, the planning
• commission, uh, this March, what is before you is to create a new tier in the voluntary density bonus program known

Sound Search™

• Springs. Hispanics. I had these questions and this is my technical comment. I had these questions before the planning commission. I
• a recommendation from the planning commission as well as conducting a public hearing at city council followed by, uh, uh
• PAC and planning commission. The bicycle advisory council meeting, um, was canceled and informally combined with the pedestrian advisory
• council meeting will be at the zoning and planning commission on the 29th, uh, to conclude our round of boards and
• , uh, for this process in April and then planning commission will have their recommendation, um, for council on May 10th