Sound Search™

• the next step would be myself and hopefully vice-chair role. And soon we'll take it to the planning commission in June
• the question is, um, if you, if you send this document to city council, uh, is that after the planning commission, is
• that what you mentioned before? Yes. We're going to go to planning commission first. Okay. And get their support
• planning commission before you present it or no, because obviously have a quick turnaround here. Okay. No, cause it's due
• to planning commission, otherwise if we have to wait another month, um, for us to approve it, then obviously it's
• another month for planning commission and everything gets pushed back. So yes. Thank you. And just to clarify, commissioners, it
• your approach to the planning commission and the council to get this on their docket for action, because all of you
• opportunity to make this request of them, or is it just a scheduling issue because we've told planning commission, we
• us asking council and talking to planning commission and actually updating urban design guidelines. I'm a hundred percent behind
• stacks up, Right? So I really think that you should go ahead with the planning commission, we, and then we've got
• were raised, but I think we need to move forward, go onto the planning commission and then iron things out and
• planning, commission and council. We will have, you know, a month to, to work on it as well and to kind of
• tweak it. So I think anything that we're going to say planning commission is likely going to say as well. So, you
• by listing specific planning, recommendations, plan commission recommendations that help you tell that story. So there is a much
• added value by having your colleagues on the planning commission, support your initiative. It gives a tremendous amount of weight
• I'm on board. Let's do it Clarify Meda clarify. Yes, please. Thank you. You will also get recommendations from planning
• commission. Keep that in mind that will help to tell your story that you can also augment or add to your document

Item(s)

• Planning Commission Recommendation: To be reviewed on May 11, 2021.

Sound Search™

• housing and planning commission, uh, updating the housing, uh, goals, council member. Sorry. You want to lay that out out
• four additional conditions that incorporate the planning commission recommendation, as well as the environmental commission recommendation and
• , it went to the planning commission and they unanimously recommended that. Then on March 24th, one day before our council
• , the recommendation from the planning commission on the original code amendment, um, in response to a previous concert
• this recommendation came from the planning commission, uh, when it was a code amendment and there would be a

Sound Search™

• been on there. The planning commission, the environmental commissioner. I think they're trying to add a few other possibilities

Sound Search™

• also be, um, attending the planning commission and parks board coming out to also, um, share information with them about
• process of being reviewed. Um, and we are anticipating potentially June to attend planning commission. Would that be before

Sound Search™

• Ah, okay. And it looks like we have a quorum. So I'll call this meeting of the zoning and planning commission to order. Um, and today is
• know, here are the subdivisions that went to the planning commission. Here are the subdivisions that went to the
• last piece, um, that, you know, was finally resulted in this case being brought forward to the zoning and planning
• commission. So it, it, although it isn't in the draft ordinance, right. Or the draft ordinance that the applicant and the

Sound Search™

• going back through the, uh, planning commission, because these items have already been through the planning commission, it still
• that it, the, it would come back to council without having to go through the planning commission process again, since it's
• about skipping the planning commission process, um, in 25 dash one dash five Oh two. Um, and it's only a, uh
• since it went to the planning commission, we do know that how we're able to build what we're able to build
• this commission as it stands, the new planning commission to be able to weigh in on this, given that quite a bit
• forward. I've been supportive of moving it forward the whole time and the planning commission meets every two weeks. So
• you go back to the, through the, um, the land of the commission review process, it's not just the planning commission. It
• has to go back to a committee of ordinances or the complaining commission, and then to the planning commission and
• , the council just considered this language very recently. And, um, I understand that there are new planning commission members
• , but I don't think that we need to send everything back through the planning commission again, uh, because there's a
• amended As amended, I might rather just abstain because of the planning commission process, but I appreciate the friendly

Sound Search™

• to clarify, I am not representing a planning commission. Um, this is I'm here's representative of design workshop. So, um, a little

Sound Search™

• the planning commission to order at 6:05 PM. So tonight I'll be, um, leading the meeting. Um, chair shot is out. So, um, I'll take a
• exhibit a of the backup. These are all reappointed as a reappointing of all returning planning commission members to continue service on
• within a municipal utility district. The planning commission has purview over properties that are within municipal utility districts
• , if this was outside of a, of a mud, it would go to the zoning and planning commission to get, but the
• however, because it's inside, it goes to planning commission. Um, and yes, uh, by zoning alone compatibility would be triggered
• . Um, and that way you don't have it out now, but it would come back to planning commission. It would actually
• small, small restaurant or cafe, then if we have to go back and come to the planning commission with the site
• , what they can get, right. What will planning commission, city council grant them? And for me, that's not the way
• . I appreciate that. And then I guess one question would be, would we today as planning commission even be able to
• by the planning commission. And so that conditional use permit makes that makes that use to have to come back and
• of background on the case. So the planning commission has seen this case once before, back in December, 2019, that requires
• to the planning commission in December of 2019 with the proposed, um, central health overlay, uh, districts that would, um
• recreation of the, um, overlay that already was recommended by the planning commission. The differences were treating it as
• that came before the planning commission, and I believe had an unanimous approval in 20 December of 2019. So I
• required, but I'm not going to, I don't want the planning commission to take their steps. So we're going to support
• I'm speaking kind of against kind of neutral, but basically, um, I was not on the planning commission at the time
• , but I just want to remind everyone that the planning commission did already look at this case. Um, so I don't
• am good evening planning commission. My name is Abby Ruiz, and I live in Sennett Hills and I oppose the
• officially declared a public space. Um, do we have the ability, uh, as a planning commission to put forward a
• planning commission lead? Yes. Yeah. June. Okay. Um, that is all of our cases tonight. So let's move to
• provides the contact information for the case manager, uh, the link to the planning commission webpage. Now prior to
• , to the virtual meetings, um, we used to do, do all notice where we included the planning commission hearing
• interest To the planning commission is I think we've heard this a number of international building codes are getting
• your previous question. Um, well, can I, can I give my answers, uh, able to answer? Yep. Okay. Um, the planning
• commission could not recommend a Z because it was not requested if we, if the applicant wished to revise their request

Item(s)

• coordination with COA Planning Staff (including reporting, presentations and general accountability) and PlanningCommission (including LDC overlap (e.g.

Sound Search™

• to the planning commission and had them initiate a code amendment to correct this. Um, in the meantime, what happened
• remember their name now, but it used to be the codes and ordinances subcommittee of the planning commission and the
• zoning and planning commission. They recommended that we fixed it. It's a simple one line, or even frankly, two word fix
• to the ordinance. So I'm going to be moving that forward to the full planning commission here soon, um, that this
• . That's talking to the planning commission. So it's going to be a little while before I can, um, you know, get this

Item(s)

• Planning Commission Recommendation: To grant downtown mixed use (DMU) district zoning.
• Staff Recommendation and Planning Commission Recommendation (prior to applicant’s amended request): To

Sound Search™

• planning commission said during the approval of this request, regulating development based on trust is a very risky
• letter to the planning commission and another to you, the council. So I'm just going to make a quick point
• council, the planning commission recommended the applicant's recommendation, which is just for DMU zoning without a height
• recommendation is to grant N P zoning. The planning commission recommendation was to grant the applicant's
• the planning commission. However, when the surrounding neighborhoods filed their petition on March 9th, which was less than
• staff recommendation was for , uh, C O zoning. These zoning and planning commission forwarded this to the city