Caption(s)

• minutes to 2:00 and I'll see you all then. Bye. Through some of the planning commission stuff and call the speakers. We have gavelled the meeting back again. Colleagues, something that I forgot to mention earlier, is I asked the clerk to put
• planning commission appointments on our next work session agenda so we can talk to each other about it. You will recall with respect to planning commission in the past we wanted to get together as a group before we made appointments because there
• was a limited number of spots for people that were available for real estate or other kinds of background, I don't remember what the standard was. Um ... There were two planning commission actions we took this morning. Leslie renominated her person
• applicant cv was intended to give people time to see that stuff. In any event, leslie's person on there was a reappointment and was not one of those more limited spots. And then mackenzie kelly removed a planning commission member, which is consistent
• someone that had been appointed by her predecessor in that office. That said I wanted to get the others of the group to talk about planning commission members collectively in the past. So I asked to put that on the work session agenda for us to talk
• about for additional appointments to the planning commission. Ok? It is 2:00. You want to call -- do we have the zoning speakers here already? >> yes, mayor. >> mayor adler: Ok. Let's call the five zoning speakers and then have jerry

Sound Search™

• and the council, the planning commission has 13 members appointed by council. Now that would change to 11 being appointed by council

Sound Search™

• use. Um, only nonprofits can get that use. Um, there is a process to go to planning commission and get approved

Sound Search™

• , it's Rob. Uh, so, uh, planning commission continues its regular bread and butter work of approval of zoning changes and

Sound Search™

• long-term resident at district two. I also currently serve on the zoning and planning commission and I'm not speaking or
• mixed use. It was recommended by the planning commission, but not by the staff. So when we post it for
• to go to the planning commission for approval. There would be a notice, uh, mailed out at a public hearing
• , held at the planning commission. Um, if the planning commission could decide to approve or disapprove the site
• of the planning commission, in which case the, um, the issue would be tossed to the city council for
• approved, whether it was approved by the council or by the planning commission, um, they would have to comply
• commission, the decision to approve or disapprove it's the planning commission, but that decision is appealable to the
• handled by the, uh, the code department and they'd be issued citations. Um, my point earlier was that the planning

Sound Search™

• with. Um, so I'd like, uh, the planning commission to just take seriously and stop paying lip service to anti
• have a super majority either at the landmark commission or the planning commission or the case never makes it to the
• for historic Preservation, Austin urges the planning commission to follow HLC, and staff's recommendation to add historic zoning
• , which didn't happen or the planning commission for it to even reach the council. So without a super majority
• the planning commission just seems like, you know, we are in a great opportunity to think more about what might
• to address the planning commission. Uh, I've got a little prepared thing I'm going to read, but I gotta

Item(s)

• Make a recommendation to the Planning Commission to deny the applicant's request to pay fee in lieu of

Sound Search™

• item two, which is to make a recommendation to the planning commission to deny the applicant's request to a fee in
• appealed and it's going to planning commission on February 9th. So parks board is, this is the first stop and parks board
• has the opportunity to make a recommendation to planning commission regarding this. So, um, the, an overview of this, uh
• , then there'll be an opportunity to discuss before making recommendations to planning commission. Next slide please. So the code
• planning commission. And before those, the planning commission, uh, hard shell first present the case to the parks board. So
• , this is, uh, steps recommendation is to, uh, is for parks board to recommend, to planning commission, to deny the
• make a motion? So I move that we make a recommendation to the planning commission to deny the applicant's request to
• planning commission, so thank you. We really appreciate it. Thank you, Scott. Thank you, Mary. We really appreciate your

Sound Search™

• two abstentions to recommend historic zoning and to forward that recommendation onto planning commission, uh, that, uh, did not
• have the super majority that would be required. Um, either planning, commission or historic landmark commission must pass with the
• and take a vote. Um, so just, just to summarize the Delta Kappa gamma case, we'll move to planning commission tomorrow
• is presenting to the lamb, to the planning commission on this case? Certainly it's still proceeds to planning commission tomorrow
• and either the landmark commission or the planning commission, uh, for it to go on to the council and the council
• will also need a super majority. So planning on, uh, making that very clear to the planning commission tomorrow night
• conclusion. We cannot recommend it to planning commission or zoning and planning commission and council that a property receive a

Sound Search™

• light of the planning commission, being able to adjust their processes, if we can come back with some options