Sound Search™

• And with today's. Um, so starting tonight's zoning and planning commission meeting, it is January 19th at 6:03 PM. And I will do the roll call
• after the deadline Monday at noon for zoning and planning commission, a contact is in created with the citizen. The
• their case. This is important because, and this is unique only to the land use commissions planning, commission, zoning
• planning commission, if you recall. And this goes back to part of the Cook's rules. If you recall, at the beginning
• , this is unique for planning commission and zoning planning commission. And that's because we do have the time to create
• , as some of, you know, I am on a contact team. I'm usually the one that does speak before, um, the planning
• commission, and it's impressive the work that Andrew puts into this and how orderly it is. Um, and I don't have to

Sound Search™

• So they have full house. Very nice. Uh, I'll call this meeting to order at the planning commission. Uh, January 12th. Uh, we'll call this meeting
• variance. However, please note the staff has identified four options for the consideration of the planning commission. The four
• the proposal was submitted to the planning commission. In addition, we propose a parking deck that does not drain directly
• , um, to make this acceptable to staff. And of course the, all the planning commission. So we went back to the
• , um, certainly, um, what could be done at the planning commission would, would, uh, would support it is to approve the
• to start. So, uh, do you like the plan that we have proposed here to planning commission? Um, I guess, let
• that language as we just discussed. It's a way that we can have clear direction from the planning commission, um, to
• planning commission that we can then put on as a team. Okay. And then if we have time, uh, we already have
• and the planning commission at seven 20. Thank you very much. Thank you. Happy new year. Happy new year. .

Item(s)

• coordination with COA Planning Staff (including reporting, presentations and general accountability) and PlanningCommission (including LDC overlap (e.g.

Sound Search™

• I sent to planning commission. Um, so this item has been on our radar since may of 2020. It was again, an
• , but really, I think this is hung up right now in codes and ordinances at planning commission. And, um, and I'm
• codes in the ordinances can vet this issue, um, and then pass it on for planning commission approval to then go to
• F two, which is, um, again, uh, at, um, at planning commission, um, there is a considerable staff support, uh, to
• . Um, okay. And this would include, um, uh, discussions of area character, um, and, um, also, uh, staff in planning
• , commission coordination, um, work group. What, what that work group had done coordination with city of Austin planning staff, uh

Sound Search™

• So, let me start tonight's meeting. It is six Oh two on January 5th for tonight and zoning and planning commission meeting. And first I

Sound Search™

• Uh, we've got a quorum and, uh, it is six Oh five and we'll get the December 22nd of December meeting and the planning commission, uh, we'll
• on and recommended by the urban transportation commission, the downtown commission and the planning commission last month. This is
• , I'm happy to stop and answer any questions and, um, request the support of the planning commission for this additional
• concerns regarding development of Rainey. First, we want to thank the planning commission for this opportunity to make comments
• how can we work with the planning commission to create a safe, inviting and sliding neighborhood. These are our concerns
• year for the planning commission, but you guys have done a wonderful job. Um, it looks like we might have a
• needed all the time. Uh, well with that, um, we are adjourning this December 22nd meeting and planning commission. We'll

Sound Search™

• commissions. We presented to the planning commission, zoning and planning commission and the downtown commission. Um, and if the

Sound Search™

• Sandra it's. The book is closed. I need to let you know that I currently serve on zoning and planning
• commission, but I'm not speaking for or representing staff in any manner. I moved to Austin one more and more

Sound Search™

• , this will need to go to the planning commission and the council for resolution. And perhaps in that time, there
• nine? It would be Nine super majority at either, but historic landmark Commission or the planning commission. Okay
• to planning commission. Then on the city council, I feel super conflicted about, um, the institution and, um

Item(s)

• coordination with COA Planning Staff (including reporting, presentations and general accountability) and PlanningCommission (including LDC overlap (e.g.

Item(s)

• Staff and Planning Commission Recommendation: To grant townhouse and condominium residence-neighborhood
• Staff Recommendation and Planning Commission Recommendation: To grant community commercial-historic area-historic

Sound Search™

• . But we request that the council support the planning commission recommendation, which is consistent with the agreement
• neighborhood association, and we are in support of the staff and planning commission recommendation to grant community commercial
• friends of Hyde park would rather see the planning commission recommendations path that will at least exempt the
• the past, um, while imperfect, uh, the planning commission recommendation is a good compromise that can get, can do
• the difference between the staff recommendation and the, uh, planning commission recommendation and on Heflin it's to discuss
• there were council questions or were those also ones where the planning commission? I could look at my notes
• to see whether the planning commission and staff recommendation were different. So you said I am 68 is the
• , but it was also recommended after a public hearing, by the zoning and the planning commission zoning slide six
• commission and your zoning and planning commission, but also can only be approved. If the applicant can prove to these
• is SF six, NP. It is about a three acre tract. Uh, the planning commission, I'm sorry. The staff
• recommendation is to approve the, um, SF six NP zoning. Did he planning commission recommended the staff recommendation to
• the building. The historic landmark commission recommended historic zoning for the entire site. And the planning commission agreed
• the existing parking lots historic. So we just recommend the same thing as the planning commission and the building
• is an agreement between both the contact team, the applicant, the planning commission, and the staff on the
• P zoning pro with a prohibition of medical offices exceeding 5,000 square feet. Um, the planning commission recommendation
• N P zoning and the contact team and the applicant, as well as the planning commission are recommending G R
• land use that has the recommendation of both the staff, as well as the, um, uh, planning commission item
• and planning commission both recommend approval. On this case, there is a valid petition of 25.05%, and it is