Sound Search™

• a planning commission. Uh, I think, uh, what legal is recommending that if we took that route, we should take item 31 and
• , we follow it with kind of the understanding to the planning commission that, um, they should, you know, work out the trail
• would then have to do the staff review the notification of the planning commission hearing. And then of course, bring
• zoning that would require an approval of the planning commission, because all use is over one acre zoning require the
• approval of the planning commission, a decision they make as appealable to the city council. Okay. And would the, um
• wouldn't require any further approval from the planning commission. If you went with the plan, commission's recommendation down 31, it
• return trip to planning commission. The special one does require a trip back to the planning commission And That plan is
• direction to city, to the planning commission to make sure that we focus on the substation piece and don't add, say
• direction of the city manager. Um, we would of course have to take to the case, to the planning commission for the
• kitchen. I'm sorry. I just did so, uh, so the planning commission, it goes back the planning commission and they provide
• you approve the zoning case, then the site plan would have to go to the planning commission, you know, further
• down the road. But the scope of what the planning commission would do with the site plan is something that if we
• don't think you can put parameters on the, um, um, whether it goes back to the planning commission or not. And
• I don't mean that. I just meant on the scope of the scope of what the planning commission would be looking at
• planning commission. I don't know how long it would take. And we're all assuming that in the end, what we want is

Sound Search™

• to the planning commission again, and thereby we would have an opportunity to make sure that Austin energy has done all they
• or the process that you get with P's zoning. I'll go into planning. Commission will help the planning commission, um
• to the video of the initial zoning and planning commission, but the members were quite extensive. They discussed this item
• before the zoning and planning commission. And they said it multiple times. I really don't know what changed between that
• go down to a planning commission. Uh, I think, uh, what legal is recommending that if we took that
• the planning commission that, um, they should know, work out the trail aspect that, uh, I understand, uh, the Jackie
• be submitted. I was going to have to do the staff review the notification of the planning commission hearing
• the PS zoning that would require an approval of the planning commission, because all use is over one acre And
• pea zoning require the approval of the planning commission, a decision they make as appealable to the city
• . It becomes a permitted use and it wouldn't require any further approval from the planning commission. If you went
• commission. Okay. So the staff's recommendation on 31 does not require a return trip to planning commission. The special
• one does require a trip back to the planning commission and that plan is appealable to the city council. Okay
• the planning commission to make sure that we focus on the substation piece and don't add, say affordable housing
• . One special called meeting council member kitchen. I'm sorry. I just, so, uh, so the planning commission, he goes
• back to the planning commission. They provide a recommendation, but isn't there a recommendation to the scope of
• the zoning case, then the site plan would have to go to the planning Commission, you know, further down the
• road Of what the planning commission would do with the site plan is something yeah. That if we felt like
• mean that. I just meant on the scope of the scope of what the planning commission would be looking
• . And the Syprine would have to be approved by the planning commission. I don't know how long it would take
• back? Maybe we could call a special session of the planning commission to do it. How quickly can we
• boat falls out, um, you know, there would be an option to see if we're having planning commission to still
• later date. Um, just want to throw that out there. If we get into a problem at, at planning commission, which
• we may not Okay. Uh, council member, uh, pool. So this was in front of the planning commission on
• issue is the notice happening as opposed to it going through the zoning process of planning commission, et cetera
• case go to planning commission, right? That's a labor code amendment, is that correct? Right. We can't waive the
• zoning case go into planning commission because that's statutory. Can someone remind me why this has been postponed
• the notice. Um, but, um, we did take it to the planning commission and they initiated it and, um, between
• quickly. There is a provision Offer, a combined planning commission and city council needing on this that We can
• with the plan commission's recommendation down in 31, it would still require a return trip to the planning
• direction of the city manager. Um, we would of course have to take to the case, to the planning
• commission for the recommendation to you, but it would be up to them as to what they, what their recommendation
• front of us is to pass item number 31, the staff, uh, uh, recommendation, um, different than the planning
• commission recommendation, any further discussion. Okay. Let's take a vote those in favor of the pools, uh, motion to

Sound Search™

• planning commission. Um, so our team, me and my team over the course of the last like few weeks has been
• . Thank you, Rob. So, uh, um, planning commission, uh, got the presentation from, uh, from Zach and, uh, staff. Sorry, I
• , one thing that has been bubbling up every couple of meetings, um, is an issue around the planning commission had spent
• , and there wasn't unanimously approved by the planning commission, but I think in general, there was a lot of support
• regarding our more comprehensive rewrite. Um, a lot of the cases that the planning commission gets are, you know, would

Item(s)

• Discussion regarding Planning Commission meeting schedule for calendar year 2021.

Sound Search™

• Okay. So, um, we're going to go ahead and, uh, bring this, uh, meeting of the planning commission to order at 6:05 PM. And, uh, we'll go
• issues except Cisco at planning commission, but I'm holding up green and I'm gonna see if I can get a stronger
• on silk or whatnot, um, resolution, uh, to the commission and council, but planning commission defer any action on any
• to speak neutral and really common. I just wish at some point, staff can come back to planning commission where they
• if there were a conditional use, then if there were a site plan with a trail alignment and the planning commission would
• of people, uh, on the planning commission have a lot of concern about, um, this trail and, uh, how it's handled
• , uh, backup, um, the schedule for planning commission, if we can go and pull up the, uh, this is a calendar for
• , um, a discussion with staff about the future home of the planning commission, um, as predicted for all of next calendar
• contact team. And, uh, just want to say, um, to tonight I've noticed there's a lot of new faces on the planning
• commission, and I want to thank each and every one of y'all for your service also want to thank, uh, first

Sound Search™

• height of 569 feet. This request will also move forward to the planning commission and the city council to achieve the
• that in a letter, um, that would go in the backup as this is a project that does need to go to planning
• commission and city council. So we would be happy to put that as part of our presentation going forward and also

Sound Search™

• Meeting of the zoning and planning commission to order it is October 20th at 6:01 PM. And first I'm going to take roles. So commissioner
• planning commission, October 20th and there is now six Oh three. And I'm going to take the role as commissioner Kosta does not seem
• on then to E one, which is discussion regarding zoning and planning commission meeting schedule for calendar year 2021. And

Sound Search™

• , this case was recommended for approval by both the staff and the planning commission. Um, I was going to offer it
• what I read to the planning commission. The result was I got two long messages and a pack of schematics trying to
• out that the zoning and planning commission recommended gr MCO for the portion that's already zoned geo and they

Item(s)

• Discussion and possible action to assign or nominate Planning Commission members for consideration by

Sound Search™

• , we will now call this meeting of the planning commission to order at six Oh three, having a quorum is commissioner Yanez, Pulido on
• case that justified a negative recommendation from the planning commission. The city is encouraging density on the corridors, but
• meeting initially where this item was heard and then a planning commission placed it on their next agenda. Um, initiated mr
• . Would it be possible for this to come back to the planning commission before then? Um, let me look at the calendar
• into the presentation, choking, Appreciate, uh, the opportunity to, uh, for the planning commission to review the climate plan
• I would also say that, like, I'm not a frequent or to the planning commission, um, but it's clear that, um
• the planning commission at 10 o'clock. Thank you very much. .

Item(s)

• coordination with COA Planning Staff (including reporting, presentations and general accountability) and PlanningCommission (including LDC overlap (e.g.

Sound Search™

• to get Jerry to get some clarification from that. I don't know if he was involved with the last planning commission meeting

Sound Search™

• of planning commission and the zoning and planning commission and to the full planning commission. Uh, we received policy recommendations from
• planning commission that were received on July 28th, uh, at the council meeting on September 17th council reset that public hearing for
• the, the ordinances. So, um, we won't cover them in detail today. Um, for an, an example of that, um, the planning commission recommended
• a three year period. Um, planning commission did not make a recommendation on the specific rate, but, um, recommend that
• need to be credited for that, for that, um, contribution. So the planning commission recommended that we include a, an
• we have right now with our current regulatory structure, uh, on slide 20, the planning commission spent the most time
• on the planning commission recommendations, part of the lyric mutation, where they talked about reduced fees based on proximity
• may just not be the exact words that, um, that the planning commission recommended and the percentages may be slightly
• planning commission was going. And in saying that the initial recommendation of having up to a 40% reduction for transportation
• those 40%? You know, where's the transparency and understanding that. And so planning commission said, you know, we think the
• additional parking, um, would not pay a fee, the planning commission. And it was really accessory dwelling units was, um
• planning commission said, well, we we'd like to be able to allow for accessory dwelling units to be added with one
• , and that would include that potential, adding that parking space for that ADU, that would address planning, commission, um