Link

Social

Embed

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[00:00:03]

UM, EVERYBODY WHO CAMERA'S ON DON'T LET ME KNOW.

YOU'RE READY.

ALL RIGHT.

SO, UH, HAVING

[Determination of Quorum / Meeting Called to Order]

A QUORUM PRESENT, I NOW CALL THIS MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO ORDER AT 6:05 PM.

SO TONIGHT I'LL BE, UM, LEADING THE MEETING.

UM, CHAIR SHOT IS OUT.

SO, UM, I'LL TAKE A ROLL CALL HERE REALLY QUICKLY.

UM, TONIGHT WE'VE GOT COMMISSIONER AZHAR IF YOU WOULD JUST WANNA RAISE YOUR HAND COMMISSIONER CONNOLLY.

GREAT.

JUST SAW YOU POP UP.

COMMISSIONER COX, COMMISSIONER FLORES, COMMISSIONER HOWARD MISSIONARY MESH, TODDLER, COMMISSIONER, AND PRAXIS COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER SCHNEIDER SHARE SHAW IS ABSENT COMMISSIONER SAY COMMISSIONER THOMPSON.

ALL RIGHT, SO WE'VE GOT 12 COMMISSIONERS TOTAL AND, UM, COMMISSIONER SHAW IS ABSENT.

I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO RECOGNIZE OUR EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS TONIGHT.

WE HAVE BOARD MEMBER JESSICA COHEN, WHO IS FROM THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT.

SO WELCOME.

AND WE ALSO HAVE, UM, AISD EX OFFICIO ARTS ALREADY SEEN.

ALL RIGHT.

SO JUST A QUICK REMINDER, WE ALL ARE USED TO THE DRILL BY NOW.

UM, JUST HAVE YOUR GREEN, RED, AND YELLOW ITEMS FROM VOTING READY AND REMAIN MUTED WHEN YOU'RE NOT SPEAKING, RAISE YOUR HAND TO BE RECOGNIZED AND IT'S EASY TO MISS YOUR HANDS.

SO IF I MISS YOU JUST YELL AT ME, UM, FOR ANY PARTICIPANTS LISTENING ON THE PHONE, SELECT STAR SIX TO UNMUTE, AND IF YOUR ITEM IS PULLED FOR DISCUSSION, YOU DON'T HAVE TO REMAIN ON THE LINE.

YOU WILL RECEIVE AN EMAIL WHEN WE WERE ABOUT 15 MINUTES AWAY FROM TAKING UP THE ITEM.

SO, FIRST

[Reading of Agenda]

UP, WE'RE GOING TO GO THROUGH THE, THE CONSENT AGENDA TODAY, UM, INCLUDING THE APRIL 27TH MEETING MINUTES AND THE PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS THAT ARE CONSENT POSTPONEMENTS OR NON-DISCUSSION ITEMS. SO I'LL READ EACH OF THESE ITEMS CAREFULLY AND IDENTIFY THOSE THAT ARE CONSENT POSTPONEMENT.

AND NON-DISCUSSION, IF YOU'RE WAITING ON THE LINE TO DISCUSS AN ITEM THAT IS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA, I'LL GIVE YOU THE OPPORTUNITY TO PULL THE ITEM FOR DISCUSSION AFTER I'VE READ THROUGH THE ITEMS. SO FIRST THE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES, DO ANY COMMISSIONERS HAVE, UM, ANY CHANGES TO THE MINUTES FROM THE LAST MEETING? THIS IS APRIL 27TH.

OKAY.

SEEING NO UPDATES OR EDITS TO THE MINUTES WE MOVE ON TO PUBLIC HEARINGS.

SO LET ME START WITH B ONE, WHICH IS A ZONING CASE.

THIS IS PULLED FOR DISCUSSION ITEM IS C 14 DASH 2021 DASH OH OH FOUR EIGHT.

MOORE'S CROSSING INDUSTRIAL PARK TRACT ONE AT 6,300 ELLROY ROAD AND 62 13 SOUTH FM NINE 73 ROAD.

AND IN CREEK WATERSHED, UM, ITEM B TWO, HOLD FOR DISCUSSION C 14 2021 DASH ZERO ZERO FOUR NINE.

MOORE'S CROSSING INDUSTRIAL PARK TRACK TWO.

THIS IS GOING FROM GR TO L I RECOMMENDED IT'S BEEN FULL FOR DISCUSSION ITEM B3 PLAN AMENDMENT NPA DASH 2020 DASH ZERO ZERO ONE 6.047 12 AND SEVEN 14 PETRONELLA STREET AND 24 OH NINE CORONADO STREET.

THIS IS A SINGLE FAMILY, TWO MIXED LIGHT USE LAND USE AND RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.

THIS HAS BEEN PULLED FOR DISCUSSION AS HAS, UH, ITEM BEFORE A REZONING C4 14 DASH 2021 DASH ZERO ZERO ONE ONE SEVEN 12 SEVEN 14 PETRONELLA STREET AND 24 OH NINE VORNADO STREET.

THIS IS GOING FROM SF THREE AND P TO C S M U N P.

UM, WITH A RECOMMENDATION FROM STAFF OF L R M U N P.

THIS HAS BEEN PULLED FOR DISCUSSION ITEM B FIVE IS A PLAN AMENDMENT.

OKAY.

NPA DASH 2021 DASH ZERO ZERO ONE SEVEN DOT OH ONE AT SEVEN 13, OR SORRY, SEVEN ONE ONE THREE BURNETT ROAD.

THIS IS GOING FROM COMMERCIAL TO MIXED USE LAND USE, AND AS RECOMMENDED BY

[00:05:01]

STAFF THAT THERE HAS BEEN A REQUEST BY THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO POSTPONE UNTIL MAY 25TH WITH THE APPLICANT IN AGREEMENT ITEM B SIX IS A REZONING C 14 DASH 2021 DASH ZERO ZERO FOUR FOUR SEVEN ONE ONE THREE BURNETT ROAD.

THIS IS GOING, UM, CS DASH ONE DASH SHEEO DASH N P AND CS DASH DOT DASH N P AND L O DASH C O N P TWO, MF SIX, NP WITH A STAFF RECOMMENDATION OF MF FOR NP.

THERE'S BEEN A NEIGHBORHOOD REQUEST FOR POSTPONEMENT TO MAY 25TH WITH THE APPLICANT AND AGREEMENT.

B SEVEN IS A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT TERMINATION.

UM, THERE WAS AN ERROR ON THE AGENDA THAT'S BEEN PRINTED.

SO I'LL READ OFF THE CORRECT NUMBER.

IT'S C 14 DASH SEVEN TWO DASH ZERO THREE TWO RCT SEVEN ONE ONE THREE SEVEN ONE ONE FIVE BURNETT ROAD.

AND THIS IS DETERMINATE, A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT THAT REQUIRES A 20 FOOT SETBACK AND IS REMIT RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.

THERE'S BEEN A NEIGHBORHOOD, A REQUEST FOR POSTPONEMENT TO MAY 25TH WITH THE APPLICANT AND AGREEMENT ITEM, BA AS A REZONING C 14 DASH 2021 DASH ZERO ZERO FOUR ONE ANDERSON LANE CONDOS FROM GR M U C O N P TO GR M U V C O AND P.

THIS IS RECOMMENDED BY A STAFF AND OFFERED FOR CONSENT AND ITEM B NINE REZONING C 14 DASH 2021 DASH ZERO ZERO FOUR TWO THREE ONE ONE FIVE MAYNOR ROAD, RESIDENCES CS, M U N P TWO C S M U V AND P.

THIS IS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF AND OFFERED FOR CONSENT.

I DIDN'T BE 10 REZONING.

TEEN DASH 2021 DASH ZERO ZERO ONE SEVEN AT 57 OH EIGHT SPRINGDALE ROAD FROM G R N P TO G R M U AND P.

THIS IS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.

THERE'S AN APPLICANT POSTPONEMENT TO JUNE 8TH AND NO OPPOSITION TO THE POSTPONEMENT ITEM.

B 11 IS A REZONING C 14 DASH 2021 DASH ZERO ZERO TWO FIVE SIX OH ONE AND SIX OH THREE WEST 40TH STREET FROM GEO TO DMU THE RECOMMENDATION BY STAFF OF DMU.

SEE, OH, THIS IS OFFERED ON CONSENT ITEM, B12 REZONING C4, 13 DASH 2021 DASH ZERO ZERO THREE SIX AT HIGHWAY TWO 90 AND 1826.

REZONING GOING FROM R R TO G R.

THIS IS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.

UM, THERE'S A POSTPONEMENT REQUEST BY THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO JUNE 8TH, WITH THE APPLICANT AND AGREEMENT ITEM B 13 C EIGHT ONE FOUR DASH 2020 DASH ZERO ONE THREE TWO CENTRAL HEALTH PUTT.

THIS IS GOING FROM P TO PUD.

IT'S RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.

UM, IT IS OFFERED FOR DISCUSSION, BUT I MAY, UM, OFFER THIS, UM, UH, COMMISSIONER MUCH TALLER, HAD A CLARIFYING QUESTION ON THIS ITEM.

UM, AND MAYBE WE CAN HEAR THE ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION AND STILL KEEP IT ON THE CONSENT AGENDA, UM, OR PUT IT ON THAT AS GET THE CONSENT AGENDA INSTEAD OF HAVING IT FOR DISCUSSION, UNLESS THERE'S OTHER QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION THAT THE APPLICANT IS, UM, UH, AMENABLE TO THE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION.

AND THERE'S NOBODY SIGNED UP TO SPEAK CHAIR.

I'D LIKE TO HEAR FROM STAFF AND SOME OF THE ITEMS. OKAY.

WE CAN KEEP IT ON THEN.

UM, SO B 13 WILL BE PULLED FOR DISCUSSION ITEM B 14 IS A SITE PLAN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT.

THIS IS SPC DASH 2020 DASH ZERO TWO ONE SEVEN C SENATE HILLS PARK.

UM, THIS IS AN APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A PARK, WHICH IS COMMUNITY RECREATION.

PRIVATE USE RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.

IT'S PULLED FOR DISCUSSION SITE PLAN COMPATIBILITY WAIVER S P DASH 2017 DASH ZERO ONE EIGHT SEVEN C OUR ONE 2,800 DEL CORTO SITE PLAN REVISION.

THIS IS AN APPROVAL OF A COMPATIBILITY WAIVER FROM LDC 25 DASH TWO DASH 10 63 AND 25 DASH TWO DASH 10 67

[00:10:01]

F TO ALLOW SWIMMING POOLS TO APPROACH INTO THE COMPATIBILITY SETBACK RECOMMENDED BY STAFF AND IT'S OFFERED FOR CONSENT.

AND THEN FINALLY, B 16 HERITAGE TREE VARIANCE TP ONE EIGHT TWO TWO FOUR ONE WHEN CHESTERTON FIELD ADVIL.

THIS HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN BY THE APP.

OKAY.

UM, ONE OTHER THING THAT I WOULD LIKE TO, UM, PUT OUT THERE TO PUT ON THE CONSENT AGENDA IS OUR, UM, E ITEMS. SO THE NOMINATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS E ONE THROUGH FOUR.

UM, THIS IS PER EXHIBIT A OF THE BACKUP.

THESE ARE ALL REAPPOINTED AS A REAPPOINTING OF ALL RETURNING PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS TO CONTINUE SERVICE ON THE JOINT COMMITTEES.

SO, UM, FOR THE CODES AND ORDINANCES JOINT COMMITTEE, THIS WOULD BE FOR COMMISSIONERS AS ARE AND CONNOLLY FOR THE COMP PLAN JOINT COMMITTEE.

THIS WOULD BE COMMISSIONERS TO BE HONEST, BURRITO AND SCHNEIDER, OR THE SMALL AREA PLANNING JOINT COMMITTEE.

THIS WOULD BE COMMISSIONERS HOWARD THOMPSON AND SHEA.

AND FOR THE JOINT SYSTEM SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE, THIS WOULD BE COMMISSIONER SCHNEIDER AS A SECONDARY.

DOES ANYBODY DISAGREE WITH THAT BEING PLACED ON THE CONSENT AGENDA? SEEING NONE? LET ME GO BACK THROUGH OUR CONSENT AGENDA.

UM, SO WE HAVE THE APRIL 27TH MINUTES ITEMS B FIVE, B SIX, B SEVEN, THE EIGHT, THE NINE, THE 10, THE 11, THE 1215, B 16, AND ITEMS E ONE THROUGH FOUR.

UM, BEFORE WE MAKE A MOTION, UM, ARE THERE ANY RECUSALS I HAVE TO RECUSE FROM ITEM B NINE, WHICH IS THREE ONE, ONE FIVE MEANER ROAD.

MY FIRM DESIGN WORKSHOP HAS BEEN HIRED AS THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.

ARE THERE ANY OTHER RECUSALS? ALL RIGHT.

DO YOU ANY OF THE COMMISSIONERS WANT TO PULL ANY OF THE NAMED CONSENT ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION OR OTHERWISE HAVE QUESTIONS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA? ALL RIGHT.

CHAIR, COMMISSIONERS AND ANDREW RIVERA.

YES.

IF WE COULD PLEASE.

THE NOTE ON THE MINUTES OF APRIL 27TH, THAT COMMISSIONER SINGH WAS PRESENT.

IF WE'LL MAKE THAT MINOR CORRECTION, PLEASE.

OH, SURE.

UM, COMMISSIONER SEEING, SORRY, WHAT, WHAT DO WE NEED TO DO MANDARIN? JUST TO NOTE A CORRECTION THAT COMMISSIONER SINGH WAS PRESENT ON APRIL 27TH FOR THE MINUTES.

OH, I SEE.

OKAY.

SO YES, THAT WILL BE A CORRECTION TO THE APRIL 27TH.

UM, MINUTES THAT COMMISSIONER SEEING WAS PRESENT WHERE'S JARRETT.

DO WE NEED TO, UH, VOTE TO APPROVE MINUTES? SO THOSE ARE THE MINUTES WE'LL GO WITH THE REST OF THE CONSENT.

UM, GOT AGENDA WITH THAT CORRECTION.

OKAY.

I HAD ONE QUESTION I'M SURE ABOUT, OH, YOU'RE ON MUTE.

SORRY ABOUT THAT.

THAT'S THE DISADVANTAGE OF USING THE SPACE BAR AND DIFFERENT TABS.

SO NOW I DON'T HAVE THE NUMBERS IN FRONT OF ME, SORRY, CORONADO CHASE, UH, THREE.

SO WE HAD RECEIVED SOME COMMUNICATION ABOUT A DESIRED POSTPONEMENT FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

UM, BUT I DON'T THINK IT WAS AN OFFICIAL REQUEST.

UM, AND I DIDN'T KNOW IF THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT WAS UP FOR CONSIDERATION OR IF WE NEED TO JUST, UH, MOVE FORWARD WITH DISCUSSION.

I THINK IT IT'LL COME UP DURING OUR DISCUSSION IF IT ENDS UP NEEDING TO BE POSTPONED.

IS THAT, THAT WOULD BE PART THE DISCUSSION.

OKAY.

SORRY THAT WASN'T A CONSENT AGENDA QUESTION.

THAT WAS JUST A PROCEDURAL QUESTION.

I APOLOGIZE.

THAT'S OKAY.

UM, ALL RIGHT.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT.

IS THERE A

[Consent Agenda]

MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES AS HE COMMISSIONER COX AND COMMISSIONERS ARE AS A SECOND? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR GREEN THREE, FOUR, FIVE, SIX, SEVEN.

AM I SEEING YEAH.

ALL 12, 12,

[00:15:02]

FOUR.

ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU.

ALL RIGHT.

WE'RE THROUGH THE CONSENT AGENDA.

UM, SO OUR FIRST

[Items B1. & B2.]

DISCUSSION IS TONIGHT.

UM, WE HAVE ITEMS B ONE AND B TWO WILL BE TAKEN UP TOGETHER.

SO, UM, I HAVE FROM, UH, THE CITY GOOD EVENING.

MY NAME IS WENDY RHODES WITH THE HOUSING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, AND I WILL BE PRESENTING FOR CITY STAFF TONIGHT.

THESE ARE TWO UNPLANTED PROPERTIES THAT ARE UNDEVELOPED.

THEY HAVE ACCESS TO NINE 73 AND ELLROY ROAD.

THE NORTHERN TRACT HAS INTERIM RURAL RESIDENTS ZONING THAT WAS ASSIGNED IN 2010 WHEN IT WAS ANNEXED INTO THE LIMITED PURPOSE JURISDICTION.

THE SOUTHERN TRACT KNOWN AS TRACK TWO HAS GR ZONING THAT WAS IN THE, UH, MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT.

AT THE TIME IT WAS CREATED IN 1988.

BOTH PROPERTIES ARE WITHIN THE AIRPORT OVERLAY ZONE, WHICH DOES NOT ALLOW FOR RESIDENTIAL USES TO OCCUR.

THERE IS A MINING OPERATION TO THE NORTH UNDEVELOPED LAND AND A TRIBUTARY OF ONION CREEK TO THE EAST AND UNDEVELOPED LAND TO THE SOUTH.

UH, THERE IS A CLOSED LANDFILL ACROSS NINE 73 TO THE WEST, AS WELL AS A VACANT FOOD SALES USE A FEW RESIDENCES AND UNDEVELOPED PLAN THAT IS, UH, UNDER THE OWNERSHIP OF ABI A, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO ZONE AND REZONE THE PROPERTIES TO THE LIMITED INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, UH, DISTRICT FOR UNDETERMINED USES.

THE INTENT IS TO COMBINE EACH TRACK WITH ADJACENT L I ZONED PROPERTIES TO CREATE A LARGER SITE.

AND THE STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST FOR BOTH CASES BASED ON THE FOLLOWING ITS ADJACENCY TO INDUSTRIAL USES AND ZONING AND ALL DIRECTIONS AND ACCESS IS TAKEN TO NINE 73 AND ELLROY ROAD, BOTH OF WHICH ARE CONSIDERED OUR TIER ARTERIAL ROADWAYS.

AND THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.

THANK YOU.

GREAT.

THANK YOU.

UM, DO WE HAVE THE APPLICANT, UM, MS. GLASGOW ON THE PHONE CHAIR? I'M SORRY.

UH, YEAH.

UM, MS. RHODES, WAS THAT FOR ? YES, IT'S A COMBINED STAFF REPORT THAT COVERS BOTH CASES.

THANK YOU.

GOOD.

THE COMMISSIONERS, UM, ALICE GLASGOW REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT, UH, RHODES IS JUST STATED VERY CLEARLY THAT THE PROPERTIES THAT ARE BEING REZONED THE INTENT IS TO COMBINE THEM WITH THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES TO CREATE LARGER LAND AREA AND TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE ZONING SITE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR THE PROPERTY.

IF SOMEONE CAN PULL UP THE PLAN FOR ME, I CAN SEE THE, UH, AS MS. RHODES INDICATED THE PROPERTIES THAT ARE BEING REZONED, I'VE TAUGHT OUT THE MORRIS CROSSING MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT AND MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT PLAN TENDED TO ARE CREATED IN ORDER TO PROVIDE UTILITIES.

TWO AREAS, WATER WASTEWATER, THAT ARE TYPICALLY, UM, UH, NOT PROVIDED BY THE CITY, UM, IN OUTSIDE PIVOT JURISDICTION, THE MOST COSTING METHOD IS, UH, IN LIMITED PROPER ANNEXATION.

SO THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST IS CALLED ELWHA WEST, AND IT'S IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF THE AIRPORT.

AND THEREFORE RESIDENTIAL USES ARE PROHIBITED.

SO THE MUD WAS CREATED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.

AND THE LAND USES THAT ARE CALLED ELEVAR WEST ARE INTENDED TO BE COMMERCIAL AND OR INDUSTRIAL IN NATURE.

THE PLAN YOU SEE IN FRONT OF YOU IS, UH, MY CLIENT'S DESIRED LAND, JUST FUN.

AND YOU CAN SEE THE RED REPRESENTS COMMERCIAL USES TO HAVE RETAIL USES ALONG THE SIDE TRACK TWAN ON YOUR CITY'S TAP ZONING MAP, YOU CAN SEE IS A TWO ACRE SMALL TRIANGLE.

THAT IS A REMNANT OF A LOT OF WAYS THAT RESULTED FROM THE REALIGNMENT OF ELWOOD ROAD, SO THAT THE LITTLE TRIANGLE NEEDS TO BE ZONED FROM INTERIM RURAL RESIDENTIAL TO ALLY TO MATCH THE ADJOINING PROPERTY.

THAT IS, OF COURSE YOU CAN SEE IN RED IS ALLY, AND THEREFORE IT CAN CONFORM WITH THOSE SITES DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.

THE TRACKS TO THE SOUTH THAT IS BEING ZONED FROM GR TO ALLY, THE SAME REASON HE NEEDS TO MATCH THE ADJOINING LAND THAT IS OWNED ALLY.

SO THAT CAN BE, UH, PLANNED WITH CONSISTENT LAND USE ZONING.

SO USE OF THE UNSPECIFIED AT THIS TIME, BECAUSE ZONING IS SUPPOSED TO CONSIDER WHETHER THE APPROPRIATE FOR THAT AREA.

AND, UH, I USE IS DETERMINED AT THE TIME OF SITE PLAN UNDER THE ORDER

[00:20:01]

OF PROCESS AS DESCRIBED IN THE CITY'S NINE DEVELOPMENT CODE, YOUR AUTO PROCESS OF BEING ZONING FIRST DETERMINE THE APPROPRIATE LAND USE, AND THEN SUBDIVISION IF REQUIRED FIVE POINTS AND A THIRD ORDER PROCESS, AND THEN BUILDING PLAN.

SO A LAND USE DOES NOT HAVE TO BE IDENTIFIED AT THE TIME OF ZONING, AS LONG AS BY THE TIME THE CYCLIN IS SUBMITTED.

THE USE THAT IS CONTEMPLATED AT THE TIME COMPLIES WITH THE ZONING DISTRICT THAT THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN ASSIGNED.

THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.

I'LL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THE COMMISSION MEMBERS MIGHT HAVE.

THANK YOU.

SO WE DON'T HAVE ANY OTHER SPEAKERS SIGNED UP, UM, MS. GLASGOW, I GUESS TECHNICALLY YOU WOULD HAVE SOME REBUTTAL TIME IN CASE YOU WANT TO USE THAT.

OTHERWISE WE OKAY.

WE CAN, UM, LET'S CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

CAN I GET, UH, COMMISSIONER IS OUR COMMISSIONERS SCHNEIDER AS A SECOND.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR.

ALL RIGHT.

WE HAVE 12, UM, LET'S START WITH QUESTIONS AND JUST A REMINDER, MAKE SURE YOU STATE WHO THE QUESTION IS FOR COMMISSIONER COX.

UH, JUST A QUICK QUESTION FOR STAFF.

UM, I NOTICED THAT THIS PROPERTY IS DIRECTLY BELOW OR DIRECTLY SOUTH OF, OF RUNWAY 35 RIGHT AT THE AIRPORT.

SO I ASSUME THERE'S SOME SORT OF HEIGHT HAZARD OVERLAY THAT RESTRICTS WHAT CAN BE DEVELOPED ON THIS PROPERTY OTHER THAN JUST NO RESIDENTIAL, UH, TO PROTECT THE APPROACHES AND DEPARTURE SERVICES AT THE AIRPORT.

UH, YES, THE, UH, WITH REGARDS TO THIS, THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED AS WELL AND THE LAND USE CONTROLLED COMPATIBLE USE AREA.

AND SO, UH, SOME OF THE USES THAT ARE PROHIBITED IN THIS AREA AND IT'S, IT'S ENFORCED BY A STAFF IS, UH, BUILDINGS THAT HAVE A LOT OF GLASS BECAUSE THEY INTERFERE WITH PLANES AS WELL AS, UM, USES LIKE LANDFILLS THAT ATTRACT A LOT OF BIRDS, BUT THERE ARE, THERE ARE HEIGHT RESTRICTION DUE TO THEIR PROXIMITY TO, OKAY.

OKAY.

THAT'S ALL.

YEAH, THERE ARE HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS AND THOSE WOULD BE IMPLEMENTED AT THE TIME OF SITE PLAN.

THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT UNDER THE ALLY DISTRICT WOULD, IS 60 FEET.

UM, SO, BUT, BUT THAT WOULD BE, UH, THE ACTUAL HEIGHT WOULD BE REVIEWED AT THE TIME OF SITE PLAN OR WOULD HAVE TO BE WITHIN THAT 60 FOOT LIMIT.

AND, AND THIS IS JUST PURELY OUT OF CURIOSITY, NOT NECESSARILY ABOUT THIS CASE, BUT WHEN IT'S WITHIN THAT PROXIMITY TO THE AIRPORT, DOES, DOES THE SITE PLANNING APPLICATION GETS SENT TO THE AIRPORT STAFF FOR THEM TO REVIEW? YES, IT DOES.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

I HAVE A QUESTION FOR STAFF YOU'LL REMIND ME, UM, IF THE FLOOD PLAIN DESIGNATIONS HAVE BEEN UPDATED FOR ATLAS 14 WITH THESE CURRENT, UH, CONSIDERATIONS, UH, WHAT IS, IS SHOWN ON THE MAP AS RURAL RESIDENTS AND, AND IS, UH, AS A FLOOD PLAIN THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE CURRENT, UH, REFLECT CURRENT CONDITIONS THAT OUR, OUR ZONING WAS ASSIGNED IN THE, UH, 19 IN THE LATE EIGHTIES.

SO IF IT HAS EXPANDED, UM, IT, IT WILL NOT BE REFLECTED AS PART OF THE RR ZONING THAT'S SHOWN ON THE MAP.

UM, BUT AT THE TIME OF SITE PLAN, THE APPLICANT WILL, THEY DON'T HAVE PREVIOUS APPROVALS ON THIS PROPERTY, SO THEY WILL BE SUBJECT TO OUTLETS.

14.

THANK YOU FOR THE CLARIFICATION.

YOU'RE WELCOME, MR. SAY THAT TWO QUICK QUESTIONS.

UM, SO FIRST OF ALL, JUST CURIOUS ON, UM, ON, UH, ON PROPERTIES LIKE THIS, I MEAN, TYPICALLY SINCE THIS THING HAS BEEN ANNEX AND IT'S LIMITED PURPOSE AND SUCH, SO, UM, WHY IT'S COMING TO PC INSTEAD OF ZAP, JUST TO GET SOME CLARIFICATION.

AND THEN THE OTHER QUESTION IS, UH, WOULD THIS SITE BE HIT BY THE COMPATIBILITY BY THE ADJACENT SF TO REGULATING ITS HEIGHT AND SETBACKS AND SUCH THAT'S THE STAFF? OKAY.

UH, SO THE FIRST QUESTION IS BECAUSE BOTH THIS PROPERTY IS WITHIN A MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT.

THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS PURVIEW OVER PROPERTIES THAT ARE WITHIN MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICTS.

THAT INCLUDES PILOT KNOBS ON CHASE.

[00:25:01]

THIS IS ANOTHER ONE, UH, KNOWN AS MOORE'S CROSSING.

UH, SO EVEN THOUGH THIS IS, IF THIS WAS OUTSIDE OF A, OF A MUD, IT WOULD GO TO THE ZONING AND PLANNING COMMISSION TO GET, BUT THE HOWEVER, BECAUSE IT'S INSIDE, IT GOES TO PLANNING COMMISSION.

UM, AND YES, UH, BY ZONING ALONE COMPATIBILITY WOULD BE TRIGGERED BY THE ADJACENT ZONE PROPERTIES TO THE SOUTH.

THOSE ARE, UM, UNDEVELOPED PROPERTIES AND RESIDENCES WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED THERE.

SO THE APPLICANT WOULD, UH, COULD REQUEST A COMPATIBILITY WAIVER AT THE TIME OF SITE PLAN.

SO THOSE SF TWOS ARE ALSO IN THE AIRPORT OVERLAY.

IS THAT RIGHT? OKAY.

YEAH, I SEE.

SO THAT THE WHOLE AREA IS GOING TO KIND OF EVOLVE A LITTLE BIT, SO, UM, BECAUSE OF IT.

OKAY, THANK YOU.

YOU'RE WELCOME.

NEXT QUESTION.

AND JUST WANT TO THANK STAFF FOR THE EXPLANATION AND THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON, UM, THIS, I DIDN'T QUITE UNDERSTAND IT AS PRESENTED ON CONSENT AND THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HELPED, AND I PULLED ANDREW'S LIST OF THE, UM, UH, ZONING YOU SUMMARY TABLE TO HELP UNDERSTAND AS WELL.

SO, UH, JUST A QUICK, THANK YOU.

YOU'RE WELCOME.

ALL RIGHT.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS SEEING NONE? IS THERE A MOTION MR. SNYDER? I MOVE APPROVAL OF STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION FOR THE ONE AND B2 SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER YOU'RE MUCH TALLER.

ALL RIGHT.

WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK TO YOUR MOTION? CAN COMMISSIONER SCHNEIDER? UH, I WAS GOOD TO GET SOME CLARIFICATION FROM STAFF AND FROM THE APPLICANT ON THIS, BUT, UH, THIS SEEMS PRETTY STRAIGHT FORWARD.

IT'S WITHIN THE AIRPORT OVERLAY THAT WILL NOT BE, UM, RESIDENTIAL, UH, HOUSING BUILT.

UM, IT'S A GOOD OPPORTUNITY FOR ENHANCING INDUSTRIAL ZONING.

THANK YOU.

DO WE HAVE ANYBODY SPEAKING AGAINST OR NEUTRAL ANYBODY SPEAKING FOR YES.

COMMISSIONER SHEA? SO, UM, I JUST WANTED TO BRING UP THAT, UM, THAT THE CITY ITSELF, I MEAN, WE'RE LOSING A LOT OF PLACES FOR INDUSTRIAL USES.

I MEAN, ALL OF EAST SIDE HAS BEEN CONVERTING, YOU KNOW, TO MORE AND MORE RESIDENTIAL.

AND, YOU KNOW, I MEAN, I PERSONALLY KNOW A LOT OF PEOPLE WHO ARE LOOKING FOR THESE TYPE OF USES.

SO, UH, COMING IN AND SEEING THESE AREAS THAT WE CANNOT EVEN PUT ANY RESIDENTIAL AND, AND MAKING IT VIABLE FOR INDUSTRIAL USE.

I MEAN, IT'S SOMETHING THAT THE CITY REALLY NEEDS.

AND, UH, SO ANYWAY, SO I'M HAPPY TO SEE THIS COMING FORWARD, ESPECIALLY AS PART OF THIS MUD WITH A PLANT COMMUNITY, UH, YOU KNOW, FROM ALL THE MIXED TYPE OF USES, YOU KNOW? SO, UM, ANYWAY, SO I'M, I'M, I'M REALLY HAPPY TO SEE THIS THING MOVING FORWARD.

THANKS.

ANYBODY SPEAKING AGAINST YOUR UNUSUAL MR. YANNIS, BLINO JUST BRIEFLY I'LL SPEAK NEUTRAL NEUTRALLY, UM, AND ECHO, UH, COMMISSIONER MUCH TELLERS.

UH, THANK YOU.

SORRY FOR THE EXPLANATION.

UM, AND JUST WANTED TO NOTE THAT, UH, WHILE I REALIZED SITE IN THE SITE PLAN PROCESS, THIS WILL BE ADDRESSED IN TERMS OF THE FLOOD PLAIN.

UM, AND WE'RE NOT PUTTING ANYBODY IN THIS AREA, UH, JUST BECAUSE OF THE NATURE OF THE AREA.

JUST WANTED TO NOTE PART OF WHY I HAD QUESTIONS THERE IS BECAUSE THERE IS A TRIBUTARY TO THE EAST OF THIS PROPERTY, AS I UNDERSTAND, AND THIS IS JUST AN AREA OF A LOT OF CONVERGENCE IN, UH, INCREASINGLY FREQUENT RAIN EVENTS.

SO I'M, I'M GLAD THAT WILL BE LOOKED AT AND JUST HOPE IT'S LOOKED AT, UH, CAREFULLY WITH THE MOST UP-TO-DATE INFORMATION.

THANK YOU.

DO WE HAVE ANYBODY SPEAKING FOR AGAINST OR NEUTRAL? ALL RIGHT.

WE'RE READY TO TAKE A VOTE.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION, WHICH IS TO APPROVE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION ON B ONE AND B SEE C YOUR GRAIN.

GREAT.

ALL RIGHT.

I'VE GOT 12 UNANIMOUS.

ALL RIGHT.

UH, NEXT ONE.

MOVE ON

[Items B3. & B4.]

TO ITEMS, B3 AND BEFORE PLAN AMENDMENT AND THE REZONING.

DO WE HAVE MAUREEN MEREDITH ON THE PHONE CHURCHES? A FEW SECONDS.

THEY'RE COMING ON THE LINE.

SURE.

[00:30:01]

ALL MS. MEREDITH, PLEASE PROCEED.

I DON'T REMEMBER B3.

YES.

AND PLANNING.

UH, I REMEMBER B3 IS PLANNING.

HELLO? YOU CAN GO AHEAD.

MY SOUND MIGHT BE MESSING UP.

ITEM NUMBER B3 IS PLAN AMENDMENT NPA 2020 ZERO ZERO ONE 6.04712714 PETRA KNOWLEDGE STREET AND 24 OH NINE CORE NATTO STREET.

IT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE GO VOLLEY JOHNSON TERRACE, COMBINED NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING AREA.

THE REQUEST IS TO CHANGE THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP FROM SINGLE FAMILY TO MIXED USE LAND USE.

IT IS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF, THEIR CORRESPONDENCE AND OPPOSITION, AND IN FAVOR, IN THE CASE REPORT, AND THEY'LL GO VOLLEY JOHNSON TERRACE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN CONTACT TEAM DOES NOT SUPPORT THE APPLICATION.

AND THESE LETTERS ARE IN THE STAFF GAUGE REPORT.

THANK YOU.

IS, UM, HEATHER ON THE PHONE? YES.

GOOD EVENING.

HEATHER CHAFFIN HOUSING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT SPEAKING ON CASE C 14 2021 ZERO ZERO ONE ONE.

THE ADDRESSES AGAIN ARE SEVEN, 12 AND SEVEN 14 PETRONELLIS STREET AND 24 OH NINE COLORADO STREET.

THE REQUESTED CHANGE IS TO GO FROM S S N C TO C S M U N P.

THE SITE IS A LITTLE OVER A THIRD OF AN ACRE, UH, STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE REQUESTS OF CSM UNP, AND WE DO SUPPORT AN ALTERNATE RECOMMENDATION OF LR AND UN.

UH, THIS PROPERTY WAS BONED PRE ZONED, LLI AND REZONED SF AND E IN 2003, AS PART AS THE, UH, THE GOKHALE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN PROCESS.

UH, MANY OTHER PROPERTY IN THE AREA WERE DOWNSIZED FROM EL BY LESS THAN 10 CATEGORIES AT THAT TIME IN 2003, IF THE PROPERTY'S LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF STREET, UH, THE PROPERTY, ALTHOUGH IT WAS AN ACCESSORY NAP, IT'S PREVIOUSLY OCCUPIED BY AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR SERVICE OFFICE, AND SINGLE-FAMILY FINESSED LAND USES THOSE STRUCTURES ARE STILL ON THE PROPERTY, BUT VACANT IMMEDIATELY WEST OF THE PROPERTY ARE TWO SINGLE FAMILY.

RESIDENTIAL HOMES ZONED TO SF THREE N P LESS OF THOSE HOMES IS METRO RED LINE, RIGHT? RIGHT-OF-WAY ACROSS OR NOTTAGE TO NORTH ARE REFLECTIONS.

THE FAMILY HOMES THAT ARE ZONED SF THREE NP, AND THAT'S ACROSS, UH, NORTHEAST OF THE PROPERTY ACROSS THE INTERSECTION OF CURRENT AUTO AND VETERAN.

ALICE IS, IS OUR BASE THAT NEIGHBORHOOD PARK AND P AND E ACROSS THAT ARE ANALOGOUS TO THE ARE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES ZONE SF THREE AND E AND KIND OF SOUTHEAST IS A SELF-SERVE CARWASH THAN C S T O N E.

THERE'S AN ALLEY AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY ACROSS THAT, AND FACING ON FIFTH STREET IS A VACANT PROPERTY STONED CSPS THAT WAS EASILY AUTOMATED SALES UPLIFT ACROSS THE ALLEY.

ALSO BASICALLY FIFTH STREET IS, UM, AN ALTERNATIVE FINANCIAL SERVICES BUSINESS PHONE CSCO UM, I'M SORRY, EAST SEVENTH STREET, I'VE SAID EAST FIFTH STREET.

AND I THINK YOU SAID, UH, UH, EAST SEVENTH IS A CORE TRANSIT COLD WAR TO B, B S ZONE PROPERTIES BACK.

YEAH, THESE LOTS WERE ALSO DOWN TO DURING THE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN PROCESS.

IN 2003, THEY WERE DOWN ZONED FROM L I T S T O N P LIMITING CERTAIN LAND USES, INCLUDING ADULT ORIENTED BUSINESSES.

CAN'T TURN AROUND, YOU KNOW, PAWNSHOP SERVICES, RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT, AND VIA FORAGE, SOME USES THAT WERE MADE CONDITIONAL OUR AGRICULTURAL SALES AND SERVICES, CONSTRUCTION SALES AND SERVICES, LIMITED WAREHOUSING AND DISTRIBUTION BUILD MAINTENANCE SERVICES, LAUNDRY SERVICES,

[00:35:01]

EQUIPMENT SALES, AND EQUIPMENT WORK, THEIR SERVICE STAFF DOESN'T SUPPORT CSSD FOR THE PROPERTY.

THE COUSIN PART, UH, IT IS FOUNDED BY THE FAMILY AND DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL USES AND ZONED AIR FIOS TO THE WEST, NORTH AND EAST, INCLUDING IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE WEST AS THESE PROPERTIES WILL TRIGGER COMPATIBILITY.

BUT THE, THAT AFFECTS THE SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, NOT THE TYPE OF USE OF PROPERTY, UH, THE CSPO PROPERTIES IN THE AREA.

WE'RE ALSO DOWN SAND, SAME TIME.

THIS WAS DOWNTOWN.

AND THAT ADDED, UH, SEVERAL PROHIBITED AND CONDITIONAL LAND USE THAT THESE PROPERTIES ARE DIFFERENT AS THEY ACCESS THE PORTRAITS AT FLORIDA OR OF EAST SEVENTH STREET, NOT A LOCAL STREET OR ANOTHER STREET.

UM, WE SUPPORT AN ALTERNATE RECOMMENDATION OF L R N U N E.

THAT WOULD ALLOW MIXED.

THAT ENABLES SCALE.

THAT'S MORE CORPORATE ADJACENT TO SINGLE FAMILY AND DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL.

IT WOULD BE FOUND IN INTENSITY FROM A PROPERTY ORIENT.

HELLO.

SO MANY OF US NOT BE ON YOUR, YOU KEEP, YOU CAN KEEP GOING.

OKAY.

UH, IT WOULD BE A STEP DOWN IN INTENSITY FROM THE PROPERTIES ALONG EAST SEVENTH STREET CORE TRANSIT CORRIDOR.

IT WOULD INCLUDE SITE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND THE SET DOWN IN INTENSITY WOULD HAVE TYPE IT ON AND REGULATIONS AND LAND USES THAT REFLECT THAT PLANNING PRINCIPLE AS PROVIDING A TRANSITION AND DEVELOPMENT, INTENSITIES AND ORDERLY PLANNING.

UM, THAT'S ALL I HAVE FOR NOW.

I KNOW THE APPLICANT IS HERE TO SPEAK AND, UH, I DON'T KNOW.

THERE'S NO, THERE ARE SPEAKERS IN OPPOSITION.

I'M NOT SURE IF THERE'S ALL SIX SPEAKERS IN SUPPORT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.

THANK YOU.

DO WE HAVE THE APPLICANT, MIKE AND KING ON THE PHONE? YES.

HI COMMISSIONER.

THIS IS MIKE KING WITH HUSH BLACKWELL FOR THE APPLICANT BECAUSE THEY SAID, OH, AND, UM, IF YOU COULD LET ME KNOW WHEN THE PRESENTATION'S UP.

SORRY.

UH, WE SEE, UM, A BLUE FIRST SLIDE.

OKAY.

OKAY, GREAT.

THANK YOU.

SO IF WE CAN GET A SLIDE TOO.

SO, UM, JUST TO GIVE YOU A BRIEF OVERVIEW, AND I KNOW YOU ALREADY KNOW SOME OF THIS IS THE PROPERTY ABOUT A THIRD OF AN ACRE WE'RE REQUESTING TO GO FROM SF THREE TO CSM UNP, AND FROM A SINGLE FAMILY DESIGNATION TO A MIXED USE DESIGNATION.

UM, AS, UM, STAFF SAID, THIS HAS BEEN A TIRE SHOP, UM, FOR DECADES, UM, ALONG WITH THREE FORMER SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, UH, ONE OF WHICH WAS USE DOESN'T OFFICE.

UH, WE ARE PROPOSING THE GROUND FLOOR COMMERCIAL USE ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, WHICH IS ADJACENT TO BETTER KNOWLEDGE STREET.

UH, THAT GROUND FLOOR COMMERCIAL WOULD BE ORIENTED TOWARDS PETRONELLIS IN A AWAY FROM THE NEARBY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES, UH, FOR THE NEIGHBORS REQUEST AND WHAT THE APPLICANT WOULD REALLY LIKE TO SEE A SMALL CAFE OR COFFEE SHOP OR SOME SORT OF FOOD SHELTER USE, UM, THAT REFLECTS THEIR HERITAGE AND, AND CUISINE THAT THEY LOVE, UM, WITH A MIX, UH, WITH A MULTIFAMILY USE ABOVE.

AND NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.

UM, SO WHERE YOU'RE ARE JUST NORTH OF EAST SEVENTH STREET, UM, ADJACENT TO FEDOR KNOWLEDGE, UM, SITE THREE SERVES THE SURROUNDING GROANING, PRIMARILY CS ZONING, AND C S I N S X THREE.

NEXT SLIDE, SLIDE FIVE.

SO, UM, I JUST WANT TO SAY THANK YOU TO THE CONTACT TEAM AND TO THE TWO NEXT DOOR NEIGHBORS IN THE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES FOR, FOR MEETING WITH US AND TALKING TO US SINCE OCTOBER, UM, WE'VE HAD SOME GOOD DISCUSSIONS, BUT WE ARE SORT OF AT AN IMPASSE OR OVER HOURS OF OPERATION FOR A POTENTIAL RESTAURANT USE.

AND WHAT OUR OFFER IS CURRENTLY IS TO, UM, HAVE CSME ZONING, BUT WITH MOSTLY LR USES, UM, WHICH WOULD MATCH THE ZONING RECOMMENDED BY STAFF PROVIDE SOME PERCENT OF UNITS OF AFFORDABLE, UM, 50% IN THE FIVE OR FOUR YEARS, UH, AND TO ADD THE LR RESTRICTIONS ON A RESTAURANT GENERAL USE, UH, TO THE PROPERTY AS WELL.

AND NEXT SLIDE, SLIDE SIX.

THIS IS THE VIEW, THE PROPERTY LOOKING FROM SEVENTH STREET WITH THE YELLOW STRIP, SHOWING THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY, SLIDE SEVEN, A VIEW OF THE PROPERTY FROM BETTER KNOWLEDGE, UH, WITH A PUBLIC ALLEYWAY THAT'S BEEN CLOSED UP, UM, DUE TO SOME PROBLEMS THAT WERE GOING ON, UH, BACK THERE.

[00:40:01]

UH, AND WE ARE, UM, WHAT DO YOU DO REOPEN THE ALLEYWAY AND MAKE IMPROVEMENTS TO IT? UM, FOR SUGGESTIONS BY THE NEIGHBORS, IT'S LIKE EIGHT, ANOTHER VIEW OF THE FORMER TIRE SHOP SLIDE NINE, UM, THE TWO ADJACENT FORMER SINGLE FAMILY HOMES IN SLIDE 10, ANOTHER UNIT PROPERTY SLIDE 11.

OKAY, WELL, THEY WANT TO TALK ABOUT THIS CAUSE THIS IS AN IMPORTANT INVESTMENT OF CITY RESOURCES AND PLANNING FOR PETRONELLA STREET.

AND, UM, PART OF THAT'S ALREADY BEEN DEVELOPED.

WE HAVE TWO, UM, WAY BIKE LANES THAT HAVE BEEN INSTALLED AS PART OF THE EAST FLEET TRAIL PROJECT, UH, AS WELL AS, UM, SOME SIDEWALKS THAT ARE PLANNED TO COME IN AND, AND ON-STREET PARKING AS WELL.

UM, AND THIS WILL CONNECT BARTHOLOMEW PARK TO THE NORTH ALL THE WAY TO LADY BIRD LAKE.

UH, AND WE THINK IT'S A GREAT REASON TO ADD, UM, THIS ZONING AND EXCUSE EXCLAMATION TO THIS AREA.

YEAH.

FLIGHT 12.

TALK ABOUT HOW THE PROJECT WOULD PROMOTE THE GOALS OF IMAGINE AUSTIN.

I THINK THE STAFF REPORT MENTIONED HOW, UM, THIS PROPERTIES AND UNIMAGINED AUSTIN SENSOR, AND THOSE ARE DESIGNATED FOR MIXED USE, UH, WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PLAN AND THEN THE REQUEST WE'RE ALSO RIGHT ACROSS THE DOCK CLOSED ALLEYWAY FROM AN IMAGINE AUSTIN CORRIDOR OR SEVENTH STREET.

AND IMAGINE OFTEN TALKS ABOUT HOW INTENSITY OF LANGUAGE SHOULD CORRESPOND TO TRANSIT PUBLIC SPACE AND WALKABLE.

AND WE SCORE REALLY HIGHLY AT THIS PROPERTY ON ALL POINTS.

I WAS RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET AND PARKS ARE GOSA ADJACENT TO THE EASTLAND PROJECT AND A LOT OF, UH, PUBLIC TRANSIT OPTIONS.

NEXT SLIDE SLIDE 13 MIXED USE WITH ALSO FROM MOCA GOES WITH A NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN, UH, PROVIDE A MIX OF USES ACCESSIBILITY, UH, TO WALK, UM, AND LIVE AND WORK IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO EACH OTHER.

SLIDE 14 SHOWS THE SITE LAYOUT WITH COMPATIBILITY STANDARDS APPLIED.

SO YOU CAN SEE ON THE RIGHT HAND SIDE, THE FIRST FLOOR THAT GROUND FLOOR COMMERCIAL USE WOULD BE ALL THE WAY NEXT TO PETRONELLA STREET.

AND WE'D ALSO BE PUSHED BACK, UM, AWAY FROM THE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, UH, WITH A MINIMUM 25 FOOT SETBACK.

AND THAT'S TWO STORES IN 30 FEET ON THE ENTIRE WESTERN HALF OF THE PROPERTY SLIDE, 15 TALKS ABOUT Y M C S ZONING, UM, AND NOT LR ZONING WORKS.

AND REALLY WHEN IT COMES DOWN TO A GOOD PART OF IT HAS TO DO WITH NEXT FLOOR AREA RATIO, UM, AND THE MAXIMUM, UH, UNITS PER THE MINIMUM SITE AREA REQUIREMENTS.

AND THOSE AREA REQUIREMENTS ARE DOUBLED.

UH, WHEN YOU HIT LR ZONING AS COMPARED TO THE GRC S EMMYS IN SLIDE 16, UM, THE PROJECT WOULD PROVIDE COMMUNITY BENEFITS, INCLUDING PARKLAND DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS, UM, GIVEN THE SMALL SIZE OF THE SITE, IF THERE WAS A FEE IN LIEU REQUIRED BY PART, INSTEAD OF ON SITE DEDICATION, THAT WOULD GO TO A NEARBY PARK.

UH, AND WE WOULD HAVE TO DO OUT WITH LEARN IS DEDICATED SEVEN FEET OF RIGHT OF WAY, UM, A LONG FEDOR KNOWLEDGE OR THE AUSTIN STRATEGIC MOBILITY PLAN, AND ALSO DO OF COURSE, COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN STANDARDS WITH SIDEWALKS AND PLANTING ZONES.

SLIDE 17, JUST WANT TO ADDRESS SOME OF THE NEIGHBOR'S CONCERNS.

AND WE DISCUSSED THIS WITH THEM AS IT'S SORT OF THE PROTECTIONS THAT WILL BE APPLIED BY CODES THAT WILL BE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH, AND WE'RE NOT REQUESTING ANY VARIANCES OR WAIVERS FROM THESE PROTECTIONS, AND I'LL STAY ON THE LINE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND CONSIDERATION.

THANK YOU.

WE HAVE ONE SPEAKER SIGNED UP FOR, UM, IS GREG ANDERSON ON THE PHONE THOUGH? HI COMMISSIONERS.

AND EX-OFFICIO, MY NAME IS GREG ANDERSON, AND I'M CALLING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF ITEMS THREE AND FOUR.

I LIVED AND WORKED ABOUT A BLOCK FROM HERE FOR ABOUT 15 YEARS, AND I'M QUITE FAMILIAR WITH THIS PROPERTY IN THIS AREA.

I KNOW THIS IS ANOTHER OUT OF DATE OUT OF TOUCH NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN FROM MARCH OF 2003, WHEN OUR METRO POPULATION HAD JUST PASSED 1 MILLION AND THE MEDIAN PRICE OF A HOME WAS ABOUT 150,000.

WHEREAS TODAY WE'RE OVER 2.3 MILLION AND OUR MEDIAN PRICE HAS JUST SOARED OVER 425,000.

WE KNOW THE HOUSING CRUNCH WE'RE FACING THIS PROPERTY NEEDS TO BE A BETTER USE OF JANE JACOBS WOULD SHARE.

WE NEED EYES ON THE STREETS AND THE ACTIVATION OF THE SITE WILL GO A LONG WAY AND MAKING THIS AREA MORE WALKABLE AND MORE INTERESTING IN THE CORNER ON THE, IN THE BLOCK OF SEVENTH AND PETTER NOW IS THE CURRENT ZONING MAKES ABOUT AS MUCH SENSE AS A BAG OF HAIR.

SO HOPEFULLY HELPING YOU ALL WITH GRANT THE APPLICANTS REQUEST FOR CS IN YOU, ESPECIALLY IF WE CAN FIGURE OUT A WAY TO PUT A V ON THERE.

UM, IF NOT THAT ZONING VAN, I HOPE YOU ALL WILL

[00:45:01]

CONSIDER AND GRANT G R N.

YOU CERTAINLY BETTER THAN STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION OF ELO, WHICH HAS A VERY DRACONIAN FAR AND CITE AREA REQUIREMENTS THAT JUST KIND OF ZAP THE AMOUNT OF HOUSING THAT THE SITE COULD EASILY HOLD.

AND OF COURSE, I HOPE THAT YOU ALL WILL, UM, HOPE THE APPLICANT WILL AGREE TO 10% AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

I APOLOGIZE TO ALL OF YOU FOR HAVING TO WORK UNDER SUCH AN ANTIQUATED 1980S ZONING CODE THAT JUST SIMPLY DOESN'T HAVE THE TOOLS THAT YOU ALL NEED, BUT HOPEFULLY WITH, YOU KNOW, A GOOD ZONING AND SOME VOLUNTARY BACKFLIPPING BY THE DEVELOPER, YOU KNOW, WE CAN GET SOME BETTER USE THAN THIS SITE THAT'S.

SO WELL-SERVED NEXT TO THE FUTURE EIGHT OH FOUR BUS RAPID TRANSIT SITE, AND SOMEWHAT ONE OF THE BEST BIKE WAYS IN ALL OF AUSTIN.

SO, GOOD LUCK.

THANK YOU.

NOW WE'LL HEAR FROM THOSE THAT ARE OPPOSED IS RAUL ALVAREZ ON THE PHONE STAR SIX TO UNMUTE MR. ALVAREZ.

ALL RIGHT.

UM, LET'S GO BACK TO, UH, HE SHOULD BE AVAILABLE NOW.

OH, OKAY.

I THINK I GAVE YOU MR. ALVAREZ.

YES.

SORRY.

YEAH, YEAH.

COULD WE HEAR FROM THE CONTACT TEAM FIRST OR DO WE JUST HAVE TO GO IN ORDER? UM, I HAVE TO GO IN ORDER ON, ON MY LIST.

UM, BUT YOU'LL HAVE SIX MINUTES EACH, UNLESS YOU'D LIKE, WHAT WAS THAT AGAIN? OKAY.

WELL, I DON'T NEED TO, I DON'T NEED TO, YEAH, JUST SWAP.

WE CAN HAVE, UH, MR. ALVEREZ SPEAK FOR THREE MINUTES AND HAVE MR. BEARD SPEAK FOR SIX MINUTES.

THAT'D BE GREAT.

YEAH, SURE.

OKAY.

WE'LL HEAR FROM MR. HUDSON BAIRD.

HI.

HEY, Y'ALL, THAT'S IN BAIRD AND I'M SPEAKING BOTH ON BEHALF OF THE CONTACT TEAM AND AS THE NEIGHBOR THAT LIVES IMMEDIATELY TO THE WEST OF THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION, UM, I'M A NATIVE AUSTINITE AND WORK AT A LOCAL NONPROFIT IN TOWN, AND THIS IS MY FIRST TIME LEARNING ABOUT LAND USE AND Y'ALL'S JOBS INCREDIBLY HARD.

SO, UM, AS GREG SAID, I THINK THAT Y'ALL DO REALLY GREAT WORK AND APPRECIATE ALL THE THOUGHTS AND THE SCALE PILOT, AND TO TRY AND MAKE OUR CITY A AFFORDABLE AND MEANINGFUL PLACE FOR FOLKS TO RAISE FAMILIES.

UM, I'M SPEAKING IN OPPOSITION TO THE REQUEST FOR CFMU AND AGREE WITH MICAH THAT WE'VE HAD MEANINGFUL CONVERSATIONS SINCE SEPTEMBER AND HAVE WORKED KIND OF IN GOOD FAITH TO FIND THE DEAL, BUT I'VE HAD A COUPLE OF STICKING POINTS WHERE WE'VE, UM, NOT QUITE BEEN ABLE TO REACH CONSENSUS, BUT THEY'D BEEN GREAT PARTNERS TO WORK WITH THROUGH THIS PROCESS.

UM, IN LARGE PART, I THINK HEATHER AND STAFF MADE A REALLY GREAT PRESENTATION FOR WHY CS IS PROBABLY NOT THE APPROPRIATE USE FOR THE SITE IN PARTICULAR, WHILE WE AGREED THAT, UM, MORE DENSITY IS BETTER.

CAN WE HOPE TO SEE, UM, MORE HOUSING ON THE SITE AND A REALLY OPEN TO ABSTAINING FROM THE CURRENT SF THREE? UM, WE THINK GOING ALL THE WAY TO A CSU UTILIZATION AND B THE ADJACENT TO SINGLE FAMILY, UM, AND ON A TIGHT INTERSECTION CORRIDOR WHERE THAT LIGHT PER ANALYSIS SEVEN BACKS UP IS PROBABLY NOT THE RIGHT, UM, KIND OF NEXT STEP UP.

SO THAT'S KIND OF THE TWO MAIN POINTS IS IT DOESN'T SEEM QUITE COMPATIBLE WITH EXISTING NEW SCHOOL ALL THE WAY TO CS AND FIT THAT LIGHT PERSONALITY, UM, WHICH HAS KIND OF A KEY CORRIDOR INTO THE GO VALLEY AND CHESTNUT NEIGHBORHOOD, UM, ALREADY BACKS UP AS IT IS.

YOU'VE GOT BOTH MORE USAGE COMING OUT OF THAT.

AND A LOT OF PEOPLE COMING IN AND OUT BECAUSE OF THE RETAIL OR FOOD SERVICE UTILIZATIONS, THAT JUST CONCERNS US ABOUT KIND OF THE ACCESS TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AS A WHOLE.

WE ALSO, UM, AREN'T QUITE SURE THAT, UH, LRM U M P UM, RECOMMENDATION IS THE RIGHT ONE FOR THE COMMUNITY WHILE WE AGREE THAT THE BUILDING COVERAGE IMPERVIOUS COVER USE IS PROBABLY MAKES SENSE.

THERE'S TWO PLACES THAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD TOM HAS SPECIFIC CONCERNS.

ONE IS THE LIGHT, AS WE MENTIONED IN THE SECOND IS, UM, KIND OF HEAVY UTILIZATION THAT YOU'D SEE FROM A RETAIL OR FOOD SERVICE BUSINESS, PARTICULARLY IN THE EVENINGS WHEN FAMILIES ARE HOME.

UM, WE THINK THAT, UH, IF YOU'VE GOT A FOOD SERVICE OR A RESTAURANT CONCEPT, THERE THERE'S A LOT OF OTHER PROPERTIES ALONG THE EAST SEVENTH CORRIDOR THAT AREN'T IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL WHERE THAT ALREADY IS OFFERED AND MAKES A TON OF SENSE TO OFFER, BUT IN THIS PARTICULAR PLACE, UM, WE THINK THAT, UH, OFFICE USE MAY BE MORE APPROPRIATE.

SO THE CONDUCT TEAM OF POSES, THE REQUEST FOR CFMU, HER PREFERENCE WOULD BE TO KEEP THE LAND USE MAP, SINGLE FAMILY AND UP ZONE TO SFS INTO, UM, MIXED USE.

WHAT'S MORE APPROPRIATE FOR THIS SPACE BASED ON THE CITY'S PLAN AND IMAGINE AUSTIN'S,

[00:50:01]

AND WE'D SUGGEST, UM, LMU AND THINK THE OFFERS A LITTLE BIT BETTER FLOOR AREA RATIO THAN LR, UM, FOR THE APPLICANT SINCE SOLVE SOME OF THE TRAFFIC CONCERNS AT THE LIGHT, UM, BECAUSE IT'D BE A LESS, UM, SINCE USAGE IN SOUTH, SOME THE NEIGHBORHOOD CONCERNS AROUND EVEN ABUSE WHEN FOLKS ARE HOME WITH THEIR FAMILIES, UM, THAT YOU WOULDN'T SEE SO MANY FOLKS COMING IN AND OUT IN THE EVENINGS, UM, WHEN FAMILIES ARE IN THE COMMUNITY.

SO WE APPRECIATE Y'ALL, UM, LOOKING AT THIS AND THINKING OF WHAT'S BEST FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND ANOTHER COUPLE OF THE NEIGHBORS THEY'RE GOING TO SPEAK AS WELL.

THANK YOU.

UM, LET'S SEE, IS, UH, WELL, YOUR FRIEND, MR. RAUL ALVAREZ.

YEAH.

UM, ALONG HERE, UM, UH, GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS.

I THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY.

AND, UM, I'M A NEIGHBOR I LIVE FOUR OR FIVE BLOCKS AWAY FROM HERE, AND I'M A MEMBER OF THE CONTACT TEAM.

AND, UM, AND I'M ALSO, UM, ANYWAY, AND THAT'S WHAT THE HATS, RIGHT.

YOU KNOW, I ALSO WORKED AT THESE STOCKS AND CONSERVANCY AND Y'ALL GET SOME EMAILS FROM TIME TO TIME ABOUT PROJECTS THAT ARE INVESTING IN OUR WORK.

UM, BUT DEBT, BUT AS A SORT OF A NEIGHBOR IN CONTACT TEAM MEMBER, I AM OPPOSED TO THE ZONING CHANGE.

AND, UM, AND I REALLY, AGAIN, IT'S, IT WAS PURCHASED AS, AS A THREE, YOU KNOW, IT'S, IT'S COMPLETELY SPECULATIVE, RIGHT? SO THEY BOUGHT IT HOPING THEY COULD CHANGE IT TO COMMERCIAL.

SO I DON'T THINK WE SHOULD REWARD SPECULATIVE BEHAVIOR IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.

UM, WHEN THEY CAME TO THE CONTACT TEAM, THEY JUST TOLD US THEY WANTED MIXED USE.

WE TOLD THEM MY PREFERENCE FOR OFFICE, THEY WENT AHEAD AND FILED FOR CS.

RIGHT.

CAUSE AGAIN, THEY ALREADY KNEW WHAT THEY WANTED.

IT'S NO SECRET WHAT THEY WANTED HERE.

THEY'RE STILL REQUESTING CFMU.

UM, IN TERMS OF PLANNING, YOU KNOW, AGAIN, IT'S JUST A VERY STRANGE PLACE WHERE THEY ARE WITH A VERY SHORT STRETCH OF, CORNADO A VERY SHORT STRETCH IF FEATHER NOW LIST AT THE CORNER THERE OF SEVENTH STREET AND HAVING A, UH, THAT'S 24 SEVEN OR THAT, YOU KNOW, GOES UNTIL 11 O'CLOCK WITH.

CAUSE I THINK SOME VERY CHALLENGING TRAFFIC SITUATIONS.

AND THEN FINALLY I DO WANT TO KIND OF SPEAK TO THE FACT THAT, YOU KNOW, THIS WAS AS I THINK STAFF ALLUDED TO, YOU KNOW, A VERY INTENTIONAL DECISION BY THE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN CONTACT TEAM, RIGHT.

TO KEEP THESE AS SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, RIGHT.

THERE'S A COUPLE OF HOMES ON THERE AND WE VERY INTENTIONALLY PUT THE MEU ALONG THE CORRIDORS WHERE WE WANTED THEM FIFTH STREET, SIX 57TH STREET.

SO IF THE CHILD IS RIGHT, SO WE, YOU KNOW, I, I DISAGREE COMPLETELY WITH GREG ANDERSON AND I THINK HE HAS A VERY MYOPIC VIEW OF, UH, NEIGHBORHOOD PARTICIPATION IN THE PLANNING PROCESS.

AND IT COMPLETELY DEVALUES HUNDREDS IF NOT THOUSANDS OF HOURS THAT NEIGHBORS PUT INTO CREATING THESE PLANS.

AND AGAIN, AND WE PUT IN, YOU KNOW, AGAIN, THE DENSITY THAT THE CITY ASKED IS TIME AND TIME AGAIN, YOU KNOW, WE ADOPT THEIR PLANS AND THEN CAME THE STATION AREA PLAN.

AND THEN WE, WE ADOPTED THAT AND THEN CAME THE CORRIDOR PLAN AND WE ADOPTED THAT AND THEY CAME TO TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN.

AND EACH TIME THERE WAS MORE DENSITY AND NO BENEFIT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

RIGHT.

SO, AND AGAIN, WE'RE GOING TO START TODAY'S SCENARIO PLANS AGAIN, RIGHT.

SO PLEASE DON'T DISMISS THE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN BECAUSE THAT'S THE VISION FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD ARTICULATED BY THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

AND WE NEED TO VALUE PARTICIPATORY PLANNING IN PARTICIPATORY DEMOCRACY.

AND, UM, I REALLY THINK IT'S GOING TO BE IMPORTANT GIVEN JUST THE LEVEL OF DEVELOPMENT THAT WE'RE SEEING RIGHT NOW.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

IS JOHN MYSTRO ON THE PHONE STAR SIX TO UNMUTE JOHN MS. JOE.

UM, CURRENTLY HE'S NOT ON THE LINE.

UM, I GUESS THAT'S IT THAT I HAVE FOUR LISTED FOR OPPOSED? UM, MICAH KING, WOULD YOU LIKE A REBUTTAL? UH, YES.

THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER.

I'M HERE.

CAN YOU HEAR ME? YES.

OKAY.

I WAS THINKING, SURE.

DIDN'T HEAR HIT STAR SIX AGAIN.

UM, YES.

SO, UM, THANK YOU.

AND I APPRECIATE THOSE COMMENTS.

UM, I WOULD JUST SAY, YOU KNOW, WHAT, THE REASON THAT WE HAVE COMPATIBILITY STANDARDS AND IT'S TO ADDRESS SITUATIONS EXACTLY LIKE THIS, AND WE ARE TALKING ABOUT CONVERTING A FORMER AUTO REPAIR AND TIRE SALES SHOP, UM, DECADES AGO INTO

[00:55:01]

A NEIGHBORHOOD CENTRIC BUSINESS WITH MULTIFAMILY UNITS ABOVE.

THIS IS NOT, UM, HISTORICALLY A SINGLE FAMILY, UH, USE ON ALL OF THE PET ANALYSIS PORTION OF THE PARK TO BE.

AND, UM, YOU KNOW, YOU LOOK ACROSS THE STREET AND THAT'S A CARWASH, SO THIS IS A VERY MIXED AREA.

AND IT'S REALLY IDEAL WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT ACCESS TO PUBLIC TRANSIT OPTIONS, WALKING, THINGS LIKE THAT.

AND WE DEFINITELY WANT TO PROVIDE AFFORDABLE HOUSING ON THE SITE AND, AND DO COMMIT TO PROVIDING 10%, UM, OR AT LEAST ONE UNIT WHICH COVERS LESS.

AND SO, UM, YOU KNOW, UM, THIS IS NOT THE MIDDLE OF A SINGLE FAMILY, RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD, UM, LIKE WHERE THE SECRET SAID, THIS IS A VERY SHORT STREET WITH TWO HOUSES ON IT.

AND WE NEED TO THINK ABOUT THE LARGER CONTEXT.

AND I THINK SINGLE FAMILY ZONING IS ENTIRELY CONTRARY TO ALL OF OUR CITY'S AFFORDABLE HOUSING GOALS GOALS.

OUR GOAL IS TO PROVIDE MORE HOUSING WITH ALL LEVELS AND TO PROMOTE MIXED USE AND WALKABILITY.

AND SO TO SAY THAT SINGLE FAMILY ZONING IS A GOOD BASELINE, IT'S JUST ENTIRELY CONTRARY TO EVERYTHING THAT I THINK THAT OUR COUNCIL HAS, UM, SET FORTH, FORTH AS A PRIORITY FOR OUR CITY.

THANK YOU.

ALL RIGHT.

THAT IS ALL OF OUR SPEAKERS.

UM, CAN I GET A MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING MR. SHEA SECOND BY COMMISSIONER ZAR? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR.

ALL RIGHT.

I'VE GOT 12.

UM, WHO WANTS TO START WITH QUESTIONS, MR. SHANE? OKAY.

UM, WE GOT A LOT OF QUESTIONS, SO, UM, I JUST WANT TO KIND OF FLY THROUGH.

I'M APOLOGIZE IF I KIND OF RUSH THROUGH IT, BUT, UM, OKAY.

SO THE CURRENT ZONING THAT IS BEING REQUESTED, WHETHER IT BE FROM STAFF OR FROM THE APPLICANT.

SO WITH JUST AN M U THAT THE PROBLEM WITH THE MEU AND WHAT'S BEEN PRESENTED TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD IS THAT IT'S SUPPOSED TO HAVE A COMMERCIAL ON THE FIRST FLOOR, LIKE RESTAURANTS AND SUCH, AND THEN UPSTAIRS IS SUPPOSED TO BE A RESIDENTIAL, BUT THE ZONING, I MEAN, HOW ARE WE GOING TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S GOING TO HAVE BOTH USES? CAUSE THE C CURRENTLY IS PROPOSED AS M YOU, YOU CAN EITHER PUT RESIDENTIAL OR YOU COULD PUT, UM, COMMERCIAL, HOW ARE WE GOING TO MAKE SURE, LIKE, NONE OF THIS IS TELLING US THAT YOU'RE GOING TO GET BOTH OF THEM.

SO WHAT IS THE, WHAT IS THE CURRENT, UM, UH, TOOL THAT IN, IN THIS PROPOSAL THAT IS GOING TO BE ENSURING THAT WE ARE GOING TO GET, OR THAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD IS GOING TO GET PRESENTED, THAT THEY'RE GOING TO GET BOTH COMMERCIAL ON THE FIRST FLOOR AND RESIDENTIAL ABOVE.

I MEAN, HOW ARE WE DOING THIS WITHOUT A V CAUSE USUALLY V REQUIRES IT WITHOUT A V.

IF, IF THIS PROPERTY CHANGES HANDS, THEY DON'T HAVE TO DO EITHER.

THEY DON'T HAVE TO DO BOTH OF THEM.

THEY CAN PICK ONE OR THE OTHER.

SO STAFF OR APPLICANT.

CAN YOU TELL US WHAT WHAT'S IN THE, WHAT'S IN THE TOOLKIT THAT YOU GUYS ARE PROPOSING? SURE.

HEATHER CHAFFIN HOUSING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT.

YOU'RE CORRECT.

IF YOU ADD AND YOU TO A OFFICE OR COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION, IT CAN BE DEVELOPED 100%, THE OFFICE 100% COMMERCIAL, A HUNDRED PERCENT RESIDENTIAL OR SOME COMBINATION THEREIN.

WE DO NOT HAVE A MECHANISM IN OUR ZONING.

SO MY, OKAY.

SO THAT'S ONE OF MY BIGGEST CONCERNS RIGHT NOW IS THE NEIGHBORHOOD COULD BE GETTING COMPLETELY NOT WHAT HAS BEEN PRESENTED CURRENTLY.

SO WE NEED A MECHANISM FOR THAT EITHER.

IT'S A V.

AND SO WHICH BRINGS UP, WHY NOT CONSIDER A V? I KNOW A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE FREAKED ABOUT, UH, PUTTING A V ON IT, BUT THE V DOESN'T INCREASE, THE HEIGHT JUST, JUST INCREASES THE, THE, THE, THE, THE AMOUNT OF FLOOR AREA RATIO.

RIGHT.

SO IT'S SELF LIMITING ANYWAY, AND STAFF WERE HIT BY COMPATIBILITY.

IS THAT CORRECT? CORRECT.

OKAY.

SO BEING HIT BY COMPATIBILITY, IT'S, SELF-REGULATING IN THAT SENSE, AND THIS TIME NOW WE'RE GUARANTEED THAT THERE'S GOING TO BE RESIDENTIAL AND THERE'S COULD BE A COMMERCIAL NOW.

UM, SO WHY NOT A VISA, UH, APPLICANT? UH, YES, UH, COMMISSIONER.

THIS IS LIKE A KEEN, UM, GREAT QUESTION.

AND YOU DO AN AFFORDABILITY ANYWAY, SO IT'S, YOU'RE ALREADY DOING AFFORDABILITY, WHICH IS PART OF THE REASON A LOT OF PEOPLE GO V YEAH, GO AHEAD.

AND ACTUALLY WE WOULD BE, I'M SORRY.

OH, OKAY.

SORRY.

THERE A LAG IN THE VIDEO.

UM, WE WOULD DEFINITELY BE OKAY WITH VERTICAL MIXED USE.

UM, I THINK THAT AT THE OUTSET, I PROBABLY THOUGHT THAT THIS WOULD BE

[01:00:01]

MORE CONCERNING TO THE ADJACENT TO NEIGHBORS.

UM, BUT, UM, CERTAINLY LIKE WE WE'VE, OUR PRIORITY IS HOUSING AND WE WOULD EVEN BE WILLING TO ENTER INTO A PRIVATE OR PUBLIC DISTRICT OF COVENANT TO PROVIDE HOUSING ON THIS SITE.

UM, AND CAN GET THAT HAMMERED OUT BEFORE COUNCIL.

OKAY.

IN COMBINATION WITH THE COMMERCIAL IN COMBINATION WITH THE COMMERCIAL THAT YOU'RE PROPOSING, LIKE RESTAURANTS OR SUCH, IS THAT CORRECT? SO INSTEAD OF GOING V YOU'D GO INTO SOME.

OKAY.

ALL RIGHT.

SO, SO THE OTHER QUESTION, NOW, I'M GOING TO KEEP GOING.

SO ON THE, ON THE, SO I'M TRYING TO UNDERSTAND WHY THE PUSHER CS, YOU MENTIONED THAT YOU'RE TRYING TO GET TO X OF, UH, OF FAR COMPARED TO WHAT WE ARE, WHAT, WHAT THE, WHAT STAFF IS PROPOSING TO X IS ONE.

SO 0.5 GOES TO ONE WHICH BRINGS US TO GR.

SO I DON'T UNDERSTAND THE CS AND CS IS LIMITED.

ANYWAY, SINCE YOU CAN ONLY DO WITH COMPATIBILITY, WHAT, YOU KNOW, TWO, THREE STORIES.

SO GR SEEMS LIKE IT FITS WHAT YOU'RE ASKING FOR.

SO I DON'T QUITE UNDERSTAND, LET ME, DO YOU REALLY NEED, THE CS IS GR ENOUGH.

AND GR IS MORE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL CS IS, YOU KNOW, COULD BE ON THE MAIN CORRIDOR.

SO WHY NOT COMMUNITY? LIKE, I THINK, I THINK GR UH, THE DESCRIPTION OF THE USE FOR GR, UM, IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE AREA.

AND WHEN, SINCE WE'VE GOTTEN INTO THIS CASE AND WORKED WITH OUR ARCHITECTS, UM, IT LOOKS LIKE WE CAN DO A VIABLE PROJECT UNDER GR.

AND SO IF THAT WAS THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION, UM, WE WOULD BE HAPPY WITH THAT GRN VIEW.

ALL RIGHT.

ALL RIGHT.

I'M GONNA KEEP GOING, BECAUSE I KNOW I'M ON A TIME CLOCK HERE.

SORRY.

SO STAFF QUICK QUESTION.

UM, CONCERN CONCERNS ABOUT TRANSPORTATION.

THE LIGHT IS THIS SITE GOING TO GO THROUGH, UH, SOME TYPE OF REP PROPORTIONALITY STUDY TO SEE WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN WITH THE AREA AND POSSIBLY PAY INTO SOME IMPROVEMENTS TO WHAT THIS MIGHT IMPACT TO THAT INTERSECTION, HETERO CHAPLAINS, HOUSING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT.

I DON'T KNOW, BUT I DON'T THINK WE DO, UH, LIKE A MAJOR BREATH PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS ON SITES, THIS SMALL, IT'S A, IT'S A PRETTY SMALL SITE.

I KNOW PROPOSING ACCESS.

AND I HAVE MORE ANSWERS TO YOUR PREVIOUS QUESTION.

UM, WELL, CAN I, CAN I GIVE MY ANSWERS, UH, ABLE TO ANSWER? YEP.

OKAY.

UM, THE PLANNING COMMISSION COULD NOT RECOMMEND A Z BECAUSE IT WAS NOT REQUESTED IF WE, IF THE APPLICANT WISHED TO REVISE THEIR REQUEST AND COME BACK AGAIN, THEN THAT WOULD BE A POSSIBILITY.

AND THEN, UM, IT WILL BE REVIEWED BY TRANSPORTATION AT THE TIME OF PIPELINES.

THAT'S ALL I CAN SIT IN THE COOKIE.

OKAY.

DO I HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION, MR. COX? MY COMMISSIONERS SAY I HAVE A BUNCH OF QUESTIONS AND I MEAN, IF WE'RE NOT ABLE TO GET THEM ALL ANSWERED BECAUSE OF TIME CONSTRAINTS, I'D SUGGEST THAT WE CONSIDER SUSPENDING THE RULES OR MAYBE POSTPONING TO CONTINUE THE CONVERSATION.

BUT, UM, I, I'VE GOT CONCERNS ABOUT THE COMMERCIAL USE ON THE SITE.

UM, AND IT, AND IT SOUNDS LIKE THAT'S PROBABLY THE BIGGEST ISSUE OF THE NEIGHBORS AS WELL.

AND I CERTAINLY UNDERSTAND IT.

I'M LOOKING AT, WE DON'T HAVE THE PRESENTATION THAT WE WERE SHOWN IN OUR BACKUP.

I WISH WE DID.

SO I'M LOOKING AT THE SITE ON, ON GOOGLE EARTH AND, AND BASICALLY IT'S AT AN INTERSECTION WHERE YOU'VE GOT, UM, HOME HOME AND THEN A PARK.

UM, AND YOU GO UP THE STREET, IT'S HOMES, YOU GO UP THE STREET OVER HERE, IT'S HOMES AND A PARK, AND THEN YOU GO THE OTHER WAY.

AND YES, YOU HAVE SEVENTH STREET, WHICH IS PERFECT FOR DEVELOPING OUT COMMERCIAL, MAKE VIEWS, ALL THAT FUN STUFF THAT WE WANT TO SEE ALONG THESE CORRIDORS.

I JUST DON'T SEE IT BEING APPROPRIATE AT THIS CORNER.

AND I HOPE THE COMMISSIONERS CAN ACTUALLY TAKE A LOOK AT THIS INTERSECTION.

UM, SINCE IT'S NOT, SINCE THERE ISN'T REALLY AN AREA OR ANYTHING IN THE BACKUP THAT I COULD, THAT I COULD FIND.

UM, AND SO I HEARD THE APPLICANT SAY THAT THEIR PRIORITY IS RESIDENTIAL, AND I HEARD SOME COMMUNITY MEMBERS SAY THAT THEY'RE ALL FOR RESIDENTIAL.

SO WHY CAN'T WE JUST UP ZONE THIS PROPERTY FOR RESIDENTIAL? WHAT'S THE PROBLEM WITH THAT SINCE WE'RE OBVIOUSLY GOING TO HAVE A LOT OF COMMERCIAL ALONG SEVENTH STREET, UH, BEING DEVELOPED.

SO IF THE APPLICANT WANTS TO RESPOND TO THAT, UM, HOPEFULLY BRIEFLY THAT'D BE GREAT.

YEAH.

I CAN ASSURE