Link

Social

Embed

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[00:00:04]

POINT TO BRING THIS MEETING

[Determination of Quorum / Meeting Called to Order]

OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.

UH, UM, GO AHEAD AND CALL THIS MEETING TO ORDER IT'S.

UH, MAY 25TH.

WE HAVE A QUORUM AND JUST GONNA DO A QUICK ROLL CALL.

UM, I'M GOING TO JUST GO AROUND THE ROOM, JUST SAY, UH, SAY HERE AND RAISE YOUR HAND.

UH, SO LET'S GO AROUND THE ROOM COMMISSIONER.

AZHAR HERE.

MISHA COMMISSIONER.

UM, LET'S SEE, VICE CHAIR.

HEMPEL I'M REALLY GOING OUT OF ORDER HERE.

COMMISSIONER COX, UH, COMMISSIONER HOWARD, UH, COMMISSIONER MUCH TALLER, UH, COMMISSIONER PRAXIS, COMMISSIONER SCHNEIDER HERE, COMMISSIONER SHEA, PRESENT AND COMMISSIONER THOMPSON AND LOOKING AROUND THE ROOM.

UH, WE'VE GOT, UM, I GUESS, UH, COMMISSIONER JESSICA COHEN PRESENT.

UM, HELLO.

AND I'M REALLY LIKING THAT MICROPHONE.

THAT'S REALLY, THAT'S PRETTY COOL.

AND I DON'T THINK I DON'T SEE OUR EX-OFFICIO, UH, ARTSY SING, UM, OR, UM, MR. RICHARD MENDOSA PRESENT, BUT THEY MAY JOIN US LATER.

UH, WE'VE GOT ABSENT TODAY, COMMISSIONER CONLEY, UH, YOU AND ITS PALITO AND COMMISSIONER FLORES.

SO WE'VE GOT A TOTAL OF 10 THIS EVENING.

JUST WANT TO REMIND YOU, UM, THAT, UH, WE STILL NEED SEVEN VOTES TO PASS A MOTION.

UH, NINE, IF ITS SUPER MAJORITY IS REQUIRED, UH, JUST TO MAKE THAT CLEAR, UH, WE HAVE FOUR DISCUSSION ITEMS LAST.

I COUNTED WITH MANY SPEAKERS.

UH, WE MAY GO PASS 10.

UM, YOU KNOW, IF WE, UH, IF WE VOTE TO GO PAST IN AND THEN, UH, IF IT GETS TOO LATE, UH, WE CAN POSTPONE THOSE ITEMS THAT WE HAVEN'T TAKEN UP YET, UM, TILL THE NEXT MEETING.

BUT MY GOAL HERE THIS EVENING IS TO GET THESE TAKEN CARE OF.

SO, UM, WITH THAT, UM, OH, I DO WANT TO ACKNOWLEDGE REAL QUICK, UH, THAT I'VE READ THE CHRONICLE AND THERE WAS AN ARTICLE, UM, BRINGING A TRANSIT HOME AND WE, IT HIGHLIGHTED OUR TWO COMMISSIONERS COMMISSIONER AZHAR AND COMMISSIONER CONLEY.

AND I JUST WANT TO SAY GREAT JOB GUYS.

UM, YOU'RE DOING GREAT WORK OUT THERE AND UH, I ALWAYS LOVE IT WHEN OUR COMMISSIONERS GET RECOGNIZED IN THAT WAY.

SO THANK YOU FOR YOUR THANKS FOR YOUR HARD WORK.

UM, SO, UH, WITH THAT, UM, JUST REMINDING COMMISSIONERS AND I'M LOOKING FOR MINE, UH, YOUR RED, GREEN, AND YELLOW, UM, ITEMS TO VOTE FIND COUNT YOU, UM, REMAIN NEEDED WHEN YOU'RE NOT SPEAKING, UH, RAISE YOUR HAND TO BE RECOGNIZED AND, UH, CALL ON ME IF I'M NOT SEEING YOU ARE.

UM, JUST LET ME KNOW VERBALLY, UH, FOR THE PARTICIPANTS OUT THERE, REMEMBER STAR SIX IS WHAT YOU DO TO UNMUTE.

UH, AND FOR THOSE OUT THERE, IF YOUR ITEM IS PULLED FOR DISCUSSION, YOU DON'T HAVE TO REMAIN ON THE LINE.

UH, YOU'LL RECEIVE AN EMAIL WHEN WE'RE ABOUT 15 MINUTES AWAY FROM TAKING UP YOUR ITEM.

WE ARE GOING TO ANNOUNCE SOME I'M GOING TO PROPOSE SOME CHANGES IN THE ORDER.

UM, UH, WHEN WE GET TO THAT, UM, TO THE DISCUSSION ITEMS, UH, WE'LL TALK ABOUT THAT LATER.

SO, UH, THE FIRST, UH, THING I WANT TO DO TODAY IS GO THROUGH THE CONSENT

[Reading of Agenda]

AGENDA.

AND THIS IS GOING TO TAKE A FEW MOMENTS.

WE HAVE APPLIED A FEW HERE, QUITE A FEW ITEMS AND LET ME GET STARTED ON THAT.

OKAY.

UM, SO TODAY, UH, ON OUR AGENDA, WE'VE GOT, UM, UH, UH, FOUR ITEM MAY APPROVAL, A MINUTES.

WE'RE ACTUALLY GOING TO POSTPONE THE MINUTES APPROVAL OF THOSE MINUTES TIL JUNE EIGHT.

UM, THERE'S THOSE ARE JUST BEING FINISHED UP, BUT WE'RE GOING TO, WE'LL APPROVE THIS ON THE EIGHTH AND MOVING INTO SECTION B UNDER PUBLIC HEARINGS.

UM, WE'VE GOT ITEM B ONE, UH, PLAN AMENDMENT.

THIS IS, UM, NPA 2021 ZERO ZERO TWO ONE ZERO ONE SHELBY LANE RESIDENCES.

UM, IT'S REC IT'S COMMERCIAL DEVOLT I FAMILY LAND USE.

UH, AND THIS IS A RECOMMENDATION IS PENDING POSTPONEMENT REQUEST APPLICANT TO JULY 13TH.

AND THEN WE'VE GOT THE, UH, THE ACCOMPANYING,

[00:05:01]

UH, REZONING, UH, WHICH IS ITEM B TO C 14 DASH 2021 ZERO ZERO ONE FIVE, UH, SHELBY LANE RESIDENCES.

UH, THIS HAS ALSO BEEN POSTPONED TILL JULY 13TH AND THAT WAS C A C O N P T M F SIX, NT, UH, ITEM B3 IS, UM, UH, MOVED THROUGH THIS PRETTY CAREFULLY.

SO WE'VE GOT ITEMS B THREE A AND B FOUR AND B FIVE, UH, V3.

UH, THESE WILL ALL BE, LET ME JUST, THESE WILL ALL BE, UH, THE WORKING GROUP THAT'S WORKING ON THIS SIDE AND HAS REQUESTED A POSTPONEMENT TILL JUNE 22ND FOR ALL OF THESE THREE ITEMS. UH, COMMISSIONER AZHAR.

IS THAT, IS THAT STILL WHERE YOU WANT TO SET THE DATE RIGHT NOW? OKAY.

AND THEN I'M GOING TO TAKE THIS OPPORTUNITY BEFORE READING THROUGH THIS.

DO YOU WANT TO ANNOUNCE THE, ON THESE ITEMS, THE DATE FOR THE, UH, GUEST FEEDBACK SESSION? THANK YOU, CHAIR.

UM, SO THE WORKING GROUP DECIDED ON HAVING AN LISTENING SESSION ON JUNE 1ST, WE WILL BE HOSTING IT FROM 5:30 PM TO 7:00 PM.

SO WE IN THE EVENING ON JUNE 1ST AGAIN, AND THE LINK FOR THAT, WE DO NOT HAVE AT THE MOMENT.

I WOULD SAY IF ANYBODY WAS LISTENING AND WANTS TO BE A PART OF THE LISTENING SESSION, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO EMAIL ME DIRECTLY OR ANY OF THE WORKING GROUP MEMBERS OR MR. RIVERA.

AND WE WILL MAKE SURE THAT YOU GOT THE LINCOLN TIME AND I JUST REALLY APPRECIATE EVERYONE'S PATIENCE.

SO, UM, COMMISSIONER IS, ARE, AND MAY SEE A CLARIFICATION AT THIS MOMENT JUST FROM, UH, MR. RIVERA.

I THINK WE'RE LIMITED AS TO THOSE THAT CAN LISTEN IN AND PART EVEN LISTENING IN BECAUSE OF FORUM ISSUES.

MR. ZAR, I MEAN COMMISSION, UM, SORRY.

UM, MR. RIVERA, DO YOU WANT TO CLARIFY THAT, UM, THE QUORUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THAT, UH, FOR THAT SESSION, JARED COMMISSIONER LAYS ON AND FARRIER? SO JUST A REMINDER THAT A QUORUM IS SEVEN MEMBERS AND THE WORKING GROUP CURRENTLY CONSISTS OF SIX MEMBERS.

SO WE ARE AT THE MAXIMUM OF PARTICIPANTS FOR PLANNING COMMISSIONERS SENDING IN WILL ALSO BE LIMITED, EVEN IF COMMISSIONERS JUST WANTED TO LISTEN IN, THAT WILL BE THAT WOULDN'T BE ALLOWED AS THE MEETING WOULD BE VIDEO CONFERENCE.

AND YOU WOULD BE LOGGING IN, IT COULD BE COUNTED AS NOT BEING PRESENT AT THE MEETING.

OKAY.

ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU.

AND CHAIR FARMERS STUFF.

I WAS JUST GONNA SAY MY, UH, JUST TO CLARIFY, UM, MY INVITATION IS FOR COMMUNITY MEMBERS, SO I JUST REALLY WANT TO FIND FIVE COMMITTEE MEMBERS WANT TO JOIN US, PLEASE EMAIL ME OR RESTAURANT OR ANY OF THE WORKING GROUP MEMBERS.

AND WE'LL MAKE SURE THAT THE COMMUNITY MEMBERS GET THE LINK.

I UNDERSTAND.

THANK YOU.

OKAY.

SO MOVING THROUGH THE THREE ITEMS, GO AND READ THESE B3 PLAN AMENDMENT, URBAN RENEWAL, URBAN RENEWAL PLAN FOR EAST 11TH AND 12TH STREET, URBAN RENEWABLE AREA MODIFICATION, NUMBER 12.

UM, THIS IS THE APPROVAL OF THE 12TH.

UH, I DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS RIGHT 12TH.

OKAY.

THIS IS THE APPROVAL OF THE 12TH MODIFICATION OF THE URBAN RENEWABLE PLAN FOR EAST 11TH AND 12TH.

STREET'S URBAN RENEWAL AREA.

UH, IT IS RECOMMENDED, UH, AGAIN, THIS WILL BE A POSTPARTUM WORKING GROUP POSTPONEMENT UNTIL JUNE 22ND.

WE HAVE A STUDENT, UH, ITEM BEFORE REZONING, UH, C 14 DASH 2021, DAZ ZERO ZERO THREE THREE EAST 11TH STREET, NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION DISTRICT AMENDMENT.

UM, THIS IS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.

THIS WILL BE AGAIN, WORKING GROUP POSTPONEMENT UNTIL JUNE 22ND.

WE HAVE ITEM B FIVE REZONING, THE C DASH 2021 DASH ZERO THREE SEVEN EAST 12TH STREET, NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION, DISTRICT AMENDMENT.

AND AGAIN, RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.

AND SIMILARLY THIS ONE, A WORKER.

IT WANTS TO POSTPONE THAT TILL JUNE 22ND.

ITEM B SIX PLAN AMENDMENT NPA 2021 DASH ZERO ZERO TWO NINE.ZERO ONE.SH 10 21 EAST ST.

JOHN'S.

UH, THIS IS SINGLE FAMILY TO URBAN'S SINGLE FAMILY LAND USE.

UM, IT'S RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.

WE HAVE STAFF POSTPONEMENT TILL, UH, TWO TO JULY 13TH.

UH, WE HAVE ITEM IT'S THE REZONING, UM, C 14 DESKS, 2021 DASH ZERO ZERO FIVE DOT S H 10 21.

THE ST.

JOHN'S, UH, RESIGNING FROM SF THREE AND P TO SF FOUR, A N P RECOMMENDED BY STAFF STAFF POSTPONEMENT TO JULY 13TH

[00:10:01]

AND A B EIGHT.

THIS ONE IS FOR DISCUSSION.

THIS IS A REZONING C 14 DASH 2020 DASH ZERO ZERO EIGHT NINE 12TH IN SPRINGDALE RESIDENCES.

UM, IT'S THE GR M U N P TO G R M U V N P RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.

AND AGAIN FOR DISCUSSION ITEM B NINE ALSO FOR DISCUSSION C 14 DASH 2021 DOES ZERO ZERO TWO THREE DOT S H ANDERSON CREEK AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

UH, THIS IS L O C O N P AND R R N P TWO G R N P RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.

AND WE'LL BE HEARING THAT ONE.

UH, REZONING.

THIS IS, UM, C 14 DASH 2020 ZERO ONE FOUR FOUR DASH.

OH, THE ADDRESS 27 SOUTH LAMAR.

THIS IS, UM, OKAY.

THIS IS FOR, UM, THIS WILL TAKE A LITTLE WHILE TRACK ONE G ARE TRACKED TO SEE US AS ONE DASH V AND SHE, OUR DASH V TRACK THREE IS CS DASH ONE DASH V AND GR DESIREE TRASH TRACK FOUR CS TRACK SIX GR DASH V DASH SEO AND TRACK SEVEN MP3.

AND, UM, IT'S, UH, REQUESTED THAT THAT BE REZONED TO MF SIX RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.

THERE IS A NEIGHBORHOOD POSTPONEMENT ON THIS ITEM TO JUNE EIGHT AND APPLICANT IS IN AGREEMENT.

ALL RIGHT, SO MOVING ON TO ITEM 11.

UM, SO WE'RE TAKING UP B 11, 12, AND 13 TOGETHER.

UM, I'LL GO AHEAD AND READ THE THREE ITEMS. B 11 IS PLAN AMENDMENT NPA 2021 DASH ZERO ZERO ONE SEVEN DASH ZERO ONE SEVEN ONE ONE THREE PER NET ROAD.

AND THIS IS FOR, UM, COMMERCIAL TO MIXED USE LAND USE, UH, RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.

B12 IS THE REZONING, UH, C 14 DEATHS, 2021 DASH ZERO ZERO FOUR FOUR SEVEN ONE ONE THREE BURNETT ROAD.

AND THIS IS A FOUR CS DASH ONE DASH C O N P A AND C S C O N P AND L O C O N P ALL TO N T A S.

STAFF IS RECOMMENDING MFA FOR NP AND, UM, THEN WE TAKE UP, UM, AT THE SAME TIME, THE 13 THAT'S THE RESTRICTIVE COVENANT TERMINATION, C 14 DEATH SEVEN TWO ZERO THREE TWO, UH, RCT SEVEN ONE ONE THREE BURNETT ROAD.

UH, THIS IS DETERMINATE, A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT THAT REQUIRES A 20 FOOT SETBACK IS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.

AND ALL THREE OF THOSE WILL BE DISCUSSION ITEMS. UH, B 14 IS A C FOUR 18 2021 DASH ZERO ZERO FIVE THREE, UH, SIERRA CAMERON ACRES.

UH, THIS IS FOR L R M U C O N T TO C S M U N P RE.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION WAS G R M U N P.

UH, THE APPLICANT IS, UH, MEANINGFUL TO STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION OF G R M U N T.

SO THAT ONE WILL GO ON CONSENT.

ALL RIGHT, MOVING ON TO GETTING CLOSE HERE.

UH, B 15 IS A DISCUSSION ITEM, IF YOU RECALL.

UM, UH, WE, UH, HEARD THIS ONE THE LAST TIME, UH, AND, UH, WE DO TO, UM, UH, KIND OF STATE LAW.

WE'VE GOT UP TO HERE THIS ONE WITHIN 14 DAYS OF CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING.

SO I KNOW THAT YOU GUYS HAD VOTED ON A LONGER PERIOD OF TIME FOR THINGS TO WORK OUT, BUT WE'RE GOING TO HEAR THAT ONE.

UH, AGAIN, WE'RE GOING TO HEAR, CONTINUE HEARING THAT TONIGHT.

AND THIS IS THE 15 SITE PLAN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, UM, STC 2020 ZERO TWO ONE SEVEN C SENATE HILLS PARK.

AND IT'S RECOMMENDED BY STAFF IT'S APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A PARK, WHICH IS A COMMUNITY RECREATION PRIVATE USE.

AND, UM, AGAIN THAT WE'RE GOING TO HEAR THAT ONE, UH, THIS EVENING, UH, THESE 16 SITE PLAN S P 2019 ZERO THREE EIGHT FIVE C AT 10 76 SPRINGDALE ROAD.

UH, THIS IS FOR A VARIANCE TO LDC 25 EIGHT DASH TWO 61 TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE CRITICAL WATER QUALITY ZONE, UH, RECOMMENDED WITH CONDITIONS.

[00:15:02]

UH, AND THIS ONE IS ON CONSENT.

UH, WE HAVE THESE 17 NOW THE SITE PLANNED, UH, AND THIS IS SPC 2020 DASH ZERO TWO EIGHT FIVE D FARR TENNIS CENTER RENOVATION.

UH, THIS IS NON-CONSENT, IT'S A FOUR SITES ZONE P PUBLIC, RATHER THAN ONE ACRE IN SIZE ARE A CONDITIONAL USE OR REQUIRE, UM, OUR, OUR APPROVAL.

UH, THIS IS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.

AGAIN, THIS ONE WILL GO AND CONSENT, UH, ITEM A B 18 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS.

UH, WE DO THIS EVERY YEAR, THIS THE AUSTIN WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS LOCATED IN THE DRINKING WATER PROTECTION ZONE.

IT'S RECOMMENDED BY STAFF AND, UH, WE'RE GOING TO GO.

AND, UH, THIS IS ON CONSENT RIGHT NOW, AND WE HAD, UH, AN AMENDMENT ON A, B 19.

UH, THIS IS A REZONING CASE NUMBER C 14 DASH 2021 TO HAVE ZERO ZERO ONE ZERO, UH, PROJECT MARABOU.

AND THIS WAS FOR LR, M U C O N T TWO C S C O N P.

UH, STAFF IS RECOMMENDING L R C O N P A.

WE HAVE A NEIGHBORHOOD, A POSTPONEMENT TILL JUNE EIGHT, EIGHT, AND APPLICANT IS IN AGREEMENT.

SO, UM, WITH THAT, DO WE HAVE ANY COMMISSIONERS, UH, COMMISSIONER PRACTICES? YES.

I HAVE A QUESTION AT THIS POINT.

IS IT POSSIBLE TO MOVE AN ITEM? UH, SAY B 15, THE SENATE HOUSE PARK, UM, TO THE CONSENT AGENDA.

IS THAT, IS IT POSSIBLE TO MAKE A MOTION FOR THAT AND SEE IF WE HAVE THE VOTES FOR IT? UM, I JUST KNOW IT WAS SUCH A LENGTHY DISCUSSION AND THERE PROBABLY A LOT OF COMMUNITY MEMBERS SIGNED UP AND I HAVE A FEELING THAT MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS MAY BE OPEN TO MOVING THIS TO THE CONSENT AGENDA.

YEAH, I THINK WE CAN, UH, UM, ANDREW, CAN YOU ADVISE US ON THAT? I KNOW WE HAVE A NUMBER OF SPEAKERS AND, UM, CATHOLICS CLOSED ANYWAY, AT THIS POINT, RIGHT? THE PUBLIC HAS CLOSED.

IT'S ALL ABOUT US ASKING THEM.

SO IT'S, IT'S ONE WAY, UM, YOU KNOW, UNLESS WE WANT TO REOPEN IT.

SO CHAIR ONE CHAIR COMMISSIONED, LAYS ON ADVAIR DUE TO THE NUMBER OF SPEAKERS.

I WOULDN'T ADVISE THAT WE DON'T, UM, HAVE IT ON THE CONSENT AGENDA, UH, BUT YOU CAN CERTAINLY HAVE IT AS THE FIRST TIME IN MY BUSINESS AFTER THE CONSENT AGENDA, UH, COMMISSIONER PRAXIS.

UH, I'LL JUST TIP A LITTLE, MY HAND A BIT HERE.

I'M GOING TO BRING THIS UP TO THE FIRST ITEM AND LIMIT SPEAKERS TO ONE MINUTE.

UH, SO THEY'LL SHOULD MOVE IT ALONG QUICKER.

SOUNDS GREAT.

OKAY.

ALL RIGHT.

WE'LL LEAVE THAT ON, UH, FOR DISCUSSION.

UM, SO LET'S SEE, BEFORE WE DOES ANY OTHER ITEMS THAT COMMISSIONERS WISH TO PULL OFF AND FOR DISCUSSION, OR DOES ANYONE WISH TO COMMENT ON ITEM? I THINK WE HAD COMMISSIONER, UH, I'M SORRY.

UM, MR. RIVERA, DID WE HAVE SOMEBODY THAT WANTED TO SPEAK NEUTRALLY ON AN ITEM THAT WE'RE WE HAVE ON CONSENT? SHOULD THE INDIVIDUAL WAS FINE WITH THE ITEM GOING ON CONSENT? OKAY.

SO WE DON'T, THEY DON'T WANT TO SAY OKAY.

NEED.

ALL RIGHT.

UM, SO WITH THAT, I I'LL COMMIT COMMISSIONER DESIRE.

SURE.

I JUST WANT TO MAKE A QUICK COMMENT ON THE URBAN MEAL PLAN AND NCCD AMENDMENTS.

I JUST WANT TO THANK THE CHAIR, THE VICE CHAIR, THE WORKING GROUP MEMBERS AND STAFF WERE WORKING WITH US ON A POSTPONEMENT, REALLY MAKING SURE THAT WE CAN HEAR FROM AS BROAD ARRAY OF STAKEHOLDERS AS POSSIBLE.

SO I JUST WANT TO HANK EVERYBODY IN ACKNOWLEDGE, EVERYBODY'S HARD WORK ON THIS, AND I APPRECIATE YOU ALL ALLOWING US THIS POSTPONEMENT.

OKAY.

DO, UM, BEFORE I GO AHEAD AND READ THROUGH THAT ONE MORE TIME, ANY COMMISSIONER DOES NEED TO RECUSE THEMSELVES FROM ANY OF THE ITEMS LOOKING AROUND? I SEE NONE.

OKAY.

UM, AND ARE THERE ANY PARTICIPANTS ON THE PHONE, UH, ON THE ITEMS THAT WE'VE PULLED FOR CONSENT THAT, UH, UM, UH, HAVE CONCERNS AND WHAT TO PULL THOSE FOR DISCUSSION? OKAY.

HEARING NONE.

UM, SO LET ME RE READ

[Consent Agenda]

THROUGH THESE JUST BY NUMBER REAL QUICK.

UM, JUST TO MAKE SURE WE'RE GOOD.

SO WE HAVE ITEMS B ONE IS, UM, UH, POSTPONE TILL JULY 13TH, B2 POSTPONED TO JULY 13TH.

WE HAVE ITEMS B3 BEFORE AND B FIVE.

WE HAD THE WORK GROUP POSTPONEMENT

[00:20:01]

TO JUNE 22ND.

UH, AND THEN ITEM B SIX, WE HAVE A STAFF POSTPONEMENT TILL JULY 13TH.

THE SEVEN IS POSTPONED UNTIL JULY 13TH, B EIGHT WILL BE A DISCUSSION ITEM.

B NINE IS DISCUSSION ITEM B 10.

WE HAVE NEIGHBORHOOD POSTPONEMENT TO JUNE EIGHT, UH, B 11, UH, THIRD, 12, AND 13 WILL BE DISCUSSED.

UH, WE'LL BE ON DISCUSSION OR DISCUSSION B 14 IS ON CONSENT.

B 15 IS, UM, W WE WILL HAVE FOUR DISCUSSION B 16, B 17, B ARE ON CONSENT.

AND B 19.

WE HAVE A NEIGHBORHOOD POSTPONEMENT UNTIL JUNE EIGHT.

SO WITH THAT, UM, AND I GET A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING, APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AND RECOGNIZE, UH, THE POSTPONEMENT OF THE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES TO, UM, MAY 11TH.

I SEE, UH, COMMISSIONER COX FOR THE SECOND BY COMMISSIONER.

UH VICE-CHAIR HEMPEL AND SO LET'S GO AHEAD AND VOTE TO, UM, WELL, IT WAS A PUBLIC HEARING AND I'M THE LAST ONE TO GET MY GREEN CARD OUT.

OKAY.

ALL RIGHT.

HERE WE GO.

THAT'S UNANIMOUS.

THANK YOU.

OKAY.

ALL RIGHT.

SO THAT CLEARS, UM, THAT'S CONCLUDES OUR CONSENT AGENDA.

SO I NEED A, I'M GONNA PROPOSE AGAIN, AS I SAID, THAT THE 15, WE MOVE UP

[B15. Site Plan- Conditional Use Permit: SPC-2020-0217C - Senate Hills Park; District 1]

TO THE FIRST ITEM AND WE LIMIT SPEAKERS TO ONE MINUTE.

UH, DO I HAVE A SECOND FOR THAT MOTION? AND IF THERE, IS THERE ANY OPPOSITION? UH, WE HAVE COMMISSIONER I'M SORRY.

COMMISSIONER IS OUR, I THINK YOU OKAY.

YOU WERE SECONDING IT.

OKAY.

UH, ANY OPPOSITION HEARING NONE.

WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND TAKE UP B 15 IS THE FIRST ITEM.

AND SO WITH THAT, I THINK, UH, ANDREW, WHO DO WE HAVE FIRST CHAIR COMMISSIONING WAS ON IT FOR HER.

SO YOU SHOULD HAVE A SPEAKER LIST.

YES.

WELCOME TO GO OFF OF THAT.

OKAY.

ALL RIGHT.

JUST, UM, THIS ONE'S WHERE WE LEFT OFF LAST TIME.

SO LET'S SEE.

WE GOT, OH, YES, APPLICANT.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH IS, UH, WHICH WILL GO FIRST.

UM, ANDY CREEL, AND AGAIN, UH, WE ARE LIMITING EVERYONE TO ONE MINUTE.

SO A USER TIME WISELY, STAR SIX, STEPHANIE.

ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU COMMISSIONERS FOR HAVING US AGAIN.

UH, ONE MINUTE, I'LL TRY TO KEEP THIS VERY CONCISE.

UH, WE FIRST OFF WANT TO EMPATHIZE.

WE HAVE CONSIDERED THE RECOMMENDATION THAT CAME OUT OF THE LAST MEETING.

UH, WE PUT A LOT OF TIME INTO, UH, OUR REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION OF THAT RECOMMENDATION.

UM, WE'VE TALKED TO OUR ATTORNEY, WE TALKED TO THE INSURANCE COMPANY, WE'VE TALKED TO TAYLOR MORRISON EXTENSIVELY, AND MOST IMPORTANTLY, WE TALKED TO OUR COMMUNITY, UM, VIA A TWO HOUR LONG DISCUSSION ON THE SUBJECT THAT, THAT, YOU KNOW, WAS VERY, UH, HEALTHY AND PRODUCTIVE.

UH, IN THE END, WE CANNOT AGREE TO CHANGE THE USE OF THE PUBLIC ON THIS PARK.

UH, MOSTLY BECAUSE WE'RE SO HARD IN THE PROCESS OF RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH GOING BACK IN THE CONTRACT THAT COULD VERY WELL LEAD TO NO IMPROVEMENTS ON THIS TRACK AT ALL.

AND WE'RE NOT WILLING TO TAKE THAT RISK IN SO FAR DOWN THE LINE.

I'LL REMIND YOU, WE DID WANT TO APPROACH THIS THE PUBLIC PARK INITIALLY PART, PART OPTED NOT TO GO DOWN THAT PATH AND, OR WE WENT DOWN THE PRIVATE PATH.

UM, IN ADDITION, STAFF HAS CONFIRMED, WE WOULD ACTUALLY NEED TO START OVER THE SITE PLAN, PERMITTING PROCESS IN ORDER TO CHANGE THE YOUTH TO PUBLIC AS WELL.

SO THAT FARTHER KIND OF EXASPERATES THE PROBLEM AS WELL.

I WANT TO SAY, WE AGREE WITH THE SENTIMENTS THAT WERE, THAT CAME UP THROUGH THE DISCUSSION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION LAST TIME WITH THE PUBLIC AND CONNECTIVITY AND, AND WITH, UM, UH, THE SAFETY OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC IN THESE SPACES.

WE JUST, DON'T ALSO FEEL LIKE THIS IS EXACTLY THE RIGHT PLACE TO HAVE THAT CONVERSATION BEING ISOLATED OF A NEIGHBORHOOD AS WE ARE, BUT WE ARE FULLY IN SUPPORT OF THE CONVERSATION AT LARGE, AND WE ENCOURAGE ALL CONTINUE THAT CONVERSATION BECAUSE WE ARE HOLISTICALLY BEHIND YOU AND I'LL LEAVE IT AT THAT.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

UM, NEXT, UH, SPEAKING FOR, WE HAVE ANTONIO G BIGGER,

[00:25:05]

THE LAST TWO YEARS, I'VE BEEN, UM, A VOLUNTEER AS THE SECRETARY OF SENATE WHO'VE HOA BOARD.

SO THIS, UM, THIS AGENDA ITEM, VERY CLOSE AND DEAR TO MY HEART.

UM, MANY, MANY COUNTLESS HOURS OF VOLUNTEERING, JUST LIKE YOU GUYS.

AND WHAT'S REALLY COOL IS OUR, OUR NEIGHBORHOOD IS VERY DIVERSE.

WE DON'T LOOK AT THE COMMISSION.

IT'S JUST LIKE, YOU KNOW, UH, UH, A COMMUNITY THAT WE ALL APPRECIATE HERE IN AUSTIN.

WE REALLY WORKED HARD AND GOT TOGETHER, UM, OVER THE LAST TWO YEARS, TRYING TO BRING THE COMMUNITY JUST TO VOTE ON THESE ISSUES.

UH, AS ANDY HAS MENTIONED ON CHANGING ANY OF THE LANGUAGE AT THIS POINT, UM, WOULD RESULT INTO NO IMPROVEMENT OF THAT, OF THAT PROPERTY TRACT IN REALLY NO BENEFIT, UM, FOR EITHER NEIGHBORHOOD, UH, THE NEW PARK, THE FIRST FOR OUR NEIGHBORING DEVELOPERS OR SENATE TILLS.

UM, I JUST ENCOURAGE YOU TO REALLY CONSIDER ALL THE WORK AND EFFORT AND ENERGY THAT OUR NEIGHBORHOOD HAS COME TOGETHER AND WE'VE LISTENED TO BOTH SIDES AND ADVOCATED FOR THOSE WHO WERE OPPOSED, WHICH I'M SURE YOU'VE HEARD.

UM, YOU KNOW, THEY HAD SOME ASKED AROUND SECURITY, WE GOT NEW FENCES INVOLVED IN THE, UH, IN THE AGREEMENT AND NEGOTIATION, UM, CONCERNS AROUND PARKING.

WE WERE ABLE TO GET SIGNED.

SO WE'VE REALLY TRIED TO ACCOMMODATE ALL, ALL PARTIES INVOLVED HERE.

UM, AND I JUST HOPE THAT YOU GUYS ALIGN WITH THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IN APPROVING THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, UM, BECAUSE WE, IT WOULD BE SO IN THAT AS TIME, UH, JUST A REAL DETRIMENT TO THE THOUGHT OF AUSTIN TO TAKE AWAY OR NOT HAVE ACCESS TO ANOTHER GREEN BASEMENT.

OKAY.

WE'VE GOT TO MOVE PERHAPS A MINUTE.

WE HAVE TO MOVE ON.

I'M SORRY, SIR.

UM, THANK YOU.

THAT'S UH, THANK YOU FOR YOUR, YOUR, UM, COMMENTS THERE.

WE HAVE, UH, I HAVE JEAN CAROL BOCA, AND PLEASE LET ME KNOW, UH, STAR SIX ON MUTE.

AND LET ME KNOW IF I PRONOUNCE YOUR NAME WRONG.

HELLO, HOW ARE YOU? THIS IS JEAN CHERRY BOGUS.

UM, I'M CALLING IN AS THE OWNER OF A PROPERTY THERE AND A GRANDMOTHER WHO IS TOTALLY, TOTALLY FOR A PRIVATE PARK.

UM, HAVING GRANDCHILDREN.

YOU WANT TO BE ABLE TO RAISE THEM IN AN AREA THAT IS CONDUCIVE TO FAMILY ENVIRONMENT.

AND AS WE VOTED PREVIOUSLY, WHICH HE'S SUPPOSED TO BE A PRIVATE PARK BETWEEN THE TWO NEIGHBORHOODS.

SO I'M JUST ASKING THAT YOU, UM, CONSIDER THAT AND RESPECT THE BOATS THAT WE HAVE PUT FORTH FOR YOU.

UM, IT'S A GREAT AREA.

WE WANTED TO SEE IT THRIVE.

YOU WANT TO SEE THE SUCCESS OF BOTH NEIGHBORHOODS, AND WE JUST WANT TO BE ABLE TO BRING OUR, OUR GRANDCHILDREN THERE AND KNOW THAT THEY'RE SAFE AND HAPPY.

AND, UM, YOU KNOW, WE CAN JUST WALK BACK TO OUR HOUSE IF WE NEED TO USE THE RESTROOM AND THEN WE'D BE GOOD.

SO THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

UH, NEXT WE HAD DAVID TIERRA BOGA, DAVID STAR SIX TO UNMUTE.

GO AHEAD.

I THINK WE MIGHT BE HAVING SOME TECHNICAL ISSUES.

UM, I GUESS, LET ME, UH, I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND JUMP TO, UH, MR. BRAD HODGES, IF YOU'RE THERE STAR SIX TO UNMUTE.

OKAY.

CHAIRMAN SEAN.

IT WAS PROB HUGGERS TOWERED TRAIL, REPRESENTING SELF FOR THE APPLICATION AS PASSED BY OUR SENATOR TO THOSE COMMUNITY 76 TO 29 OUT OF TWO 53.

AND I'M AGAINST PUBLIC USE CONDITIONS ON SUBACUTE, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN VOTED FOR BY OUR COMMUNITY AND HAS NOT BEEN DEFINED BY THE CITY AND DIFFERENT TERMS AND CONDITIONS THAT WILL KEEP OUR COMMITTEES.

THE PROPERTY IMPROVEMENTS APPLIED FOR ARE IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF OUR COMMUNITY.

NOT IN THE BISHOP AND OFFICIAL INTEREST OF OUR COMMUNITY.

PLEASE VOTE TO PASS WITH NO OBJECTIONS.

THANKS.

OKAY.

UM, LET'S GO AHEAD AND MOVE BACK AND THEN I'LL COME BACK TO DAVID , BUT RIGHT NOW, DO WE HAVE AARON BENTLEY

[00:30:02]

STAR 608? YEAH.

THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO DISCUSS MY SUPPORT FOR THE PARK.

UH, FIRSTLY, I JUST WANT TO POINT OUT THAT THIS IS NOT A PARK WHERE THERE'S NOTHING, THIS IS A PARK WHERE THERE'S A VACANT LOT, UH, LIABILITY STILL EXISTS, BUT A LOT OF IT'S FIT DRAINAGE.

I CAN'T SEE ANY IMPACT.

THE INFRASTRUCTURE WOULD BRING PARKING SPOTS ALREADY EXISTS.

I ASSURE YOU THE NOISE WON'T BE WORSE THAN THE CONSTANT BICYCLISTS.

I HEAR BEHIND MY HOUSE ON 51ST STREET, I DIDN'T HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO EXPRESS MY OPINION ON THOSE BIKE LANES, BUT HAD I, I WOULD HAVE APPROVED THEM BECAUSE THE NOT IN MY BACKYARD ATTITUDE IS DETRIMENTAL TO OUR INNER CITY COMMUNITIES.

I WORRY THAT SOMEONE WILL DO DRUGS AND A LOT AND LEAVE NEEDLES BECAUSE WE FOUND THEM THERE BEFORE.

UM, I WORRY THAT PEOPLE ARE USING A LOT TO HIDE FROM THE POLICE BECAUSE I'VE SEEN THEM DO THAT BEFORE.

UM, PARKS DON'T TYPICALLY ATTRACT THIS TYPE OF ATTENTION.

UH, FINALLY, AND MOST IMPORTANTLY, WE DISCUSSED THIS AS A NEIGHBORHOOD AND HOW TO VOTE, UM, WHICH THE PARK ONE BY THE OVERWHELMING MAJORITY THAT WAS REQUIRED BY OUR HOA, THE NEIGHBORS HERE WANT THE PART ASIDE FROM JUST A HANDFUL, PLEASE APPROVE OF OUR PARKS AND THAT'S IT.

OKAY.

WE HAVE, UH, HILARY BENTLEY START 600 I'M HILARIE BENTLEY.

AND I LIVE DIRECTLY FACING THE PROPOSED PARK.

I'M A HOMEOWNER.

UM, I WANT THE PARK BECAUSE I'M INTO ACTIVATING DEAD SPACES AND TURNING THEM INTO PART OF THE COMMUNITY RATHER THAN JUST OVERGROWN LOT.

I WANT TO CREATE SPACES THAT WE CAN SHARE WITH OUR NEIGHBORS.

IT IS NOT CURRENTLY ENGAGED.

AND SO JUST KIND OF WHATEVER HAPPENS THERE.

BUT IF THIS SEEMS LIKE A NICE, PURPOSEFUL IDEA, I WANT A PLACE WHERE KIDS CAN PLAY WITHOUT BEING WORRIED ABOUT GETTING HIT BY A CAR.

I HAVEN'T HEARD ARGUMENTS AGAINST IT BESIDES SELFISHNESS.

AND I'M HOPING THAT WE CAN NOT ONLY REALIZE THAT WE LIVE IN CENTRAL AUSTIN.

NOISE IS JUST A PART OF OUR LIFE.

THE INSURANCE RISK IS WORSE WITH IT AS A VACANT LOT.

EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THESE ARGUMENTS HAS BEEN METICULOUSLY AND PAINFULLY DEBUNKED.

WE JUST WANT A PUBLIC PLACE TO HANG OUT AND MEET A BLIND EYE TO THE FACT THAT THE OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD, ONCE THE PARK, UM, THAT THAT'S WHAT I HAVE TO SAY AND THINGS FOR ALLOWING US TO SHARE.

OKAY, WE'RE GONNA THE LAST, UH, WE'RE GOING TO TRY TO COME BACK TO DAVID , UH, STAR SIX AND MEET IF YOU'RE THERE.

UH, WE'LL GIVE YOU A CHANCE TO SPEAK BEFORE WE MOVE ON TO THOSE OPPOSED.

THIS IS DAVID.

TROY.

CAN I SPEAK NOW? CAN YOU HEAR ME? YES.

THANK YOU.

GO AHEAD.

THANK YOU.

I AM A OWNER RESIDENT THERE AND I ALSO HAVE GRANDCHILDREN AND CHILDREN THAT I WOULD LIKE TO BRING THERE.

CURRENTLY, THE SPACE IS COMPLETELY UNUSED.

THIS WOULD GIVE THE COMMUNITY WHO HAVE VOTED ON IT, AN OPPORTUNITY TO USE THIS SPACE IN A VERY CONSTRUCTIVE MANNER.

IT NEEDS TO BE PRIVATE IN ORDER TO PROTECT ANYONE WHO GOES THERE AS IT IS AN ISOLATED SPOT THAT DOESN'T ENCOURAGE THE PUBLIC TO COME THERE.

IF YOU, AS WE PROPOSE PRACTICE AND ALLOW US TO HAVE OUR BENTONVILLE PARK, IT'LL HELP US TO GET TO KNOW OUR NEW NEIGHBORS, WHICH IS A LARGE DEVELOPMENT BY TREVOR MORRISON ADJACENT TO US.

IT WILL BRING THE COMMUNITY TOGETHER.

IT WILL TAKE WASTED SPACE AND TURN IT INTO A GREAT PLACE FOR THE COMMUNITY.

WE CAN INVITE OTHERS FROM OUTSIDE THE COMMUNITY.

SO IN THAT SENSE, IT MIGHT BE CONSIDERED, YOU KNOW, PUBLIC PRIVATE IN THAT WE COULD INVITE PEOPLE THERE BESIDES JUST THE FOLKS I BELIEVE DATED.

AND WE JUST HOPE THAT YOU WILL VOTE FOR THIS, THAT THE SENATE HILL PARK WILL GO THROUGH AS CONTRACTED CURRENTLY.

PLEASE DO THAT FOR US AND LET'S MAKE AUSTIN A BETTER COMMUNITY.

THANK YOU.

ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU.

AND NOW WE'RE GOING TO MOVE TO THOSE OPPOSED.

UH, AGAIN, ONE MINUTE PER SPEAKER AND I HAVE FIRST ON THE LIST, ROSALYN WILLIAMS. HELLO.

MY NAME IS ROSALYN WILLIAMS AND I'M A HOMEOWNER.

I'VE BEEN ON HER AND SAID NAILS SINCE 2007.

I LIVE HERE ON CHARGE TRAIL WHERE THE, UM, THERE HAS BEEN

[00:35:01]

SOME FOR THE, UH, HABIT PARK, UM, THE AREA WITHIN TO BE ON-GROUND, I'M USING A MANAGED, WHICH HAS BEEN CLEARLY A DECEPTION.

UM, UH, EVERY MORNING THAT I EXERCISE, I SEE FAMILIES WITH THEIR CHILDREN.

THEY, UH, IN THE AFTERNOON WALKING IN THAT AREA AS WELL AS OWNERS WITH THEIR PETS.

UM, I'M JUST ASKING THAT THE COMMISSIONERS LEAD THIS AS A WALKING TRAIL, WHICH IT HAS BEEN SINCE 2007.

UM, AND JUST TO VOTE, UH, AGAINST THIS PRIVATE PARK AS A PROPOSED PRIVATE PARK, I BELIEVE IT BRINGS, UH, SAFETY PARKING AND MAINTENANCE ISSUES THAT HAVE NOT BEEN RESOLVED WITH THE RESIDENCE, THE HOA BOARD.

AND I KNOW THE OTHER PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ALSO HAD QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT IN THE LAST MEETING.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

THERE WE GO.

UH, NEXT WE HAVE ABBY RUIZ.

HI, THE APPLICANT DID NOT DISCUSS THE PARK IN DETAIL WITH OUR NEIGHBORHOOD AS A WHOLE, AS STATED, HE ACTUALLY DISCUSSED THIS WITH PREPPING 11 RESIDENTS AND ATTENDED AT OUR MOST RECENT HOA MEETING VIA ZOOM.

AT THAT TIME, THE APPLICANT CAME, HE WOULD NOT DIGRESS FROM THE ORIGINAL PLAN FOR PRIVATE PARTS BYPASS.

THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDED A LOT OF INTERFERENCE THERE.

MAYBE THE DEVELOPER WOULD NOT ALLOW ANY DEVIATION, WHICHEVER CREATES AN UNWILLING AS POINTED OUT, JUST PLEASE PERMIT FOR A PRIVATE PARTY.

THANKS FOR INTERRUPTING BRAD, MS. TERESA, IF YOU COULD PLEASE BEGIN SHERRY YOU'RE ON MUTE.

THANK YOU.

AND NOW YOU GUYS CAN HEAR ME, MR. UH, LET'S SEE.

UM, THIS IS ABBY RUIZ.

ARE YOU OUT THERE? I DON'T KNOW IF WE HEARD YOU CAUSE IT WAS SOMEWHAT GARBLED.

ARE YOU STILL THERE? OKAY, GO AHEAD AND START.

WE COULDN'T.

I COULD NOT HEAR YOU CLEARLY.

SO IF YOU COULD, I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND START YOUR MINUTE AGAIN BECAUSE WE WERE HAVING TECHNICAL PROBLEMS. SURE.

I WONDER YOU'VE BEEN MUTED TO UNMUTE YOURSELF, PRESS STAR SIX.

SURE.

MY APOLOGIES, UH, HAVING A LITTLE BIT DIFFICULT TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES ON OUR END, UH, APOLOGIES TO MISERIES MS. REESE, IF YOU COULD PROCEED, YOU MAY NEED TO SELECT STAR SIX.

I HAVE.

CAN YOU HEAR ME? YES.

ALL RIGHT.

I'M GOING TO ASK ONE MORE TIME.

CAN YOU HEAR ME ALL RIGHT.

UM, I'M GOING TO LET YOU KNOW THAT THE APPLICANT DID NOT DISCUSS THE PARK WITH OUR NEIGHBORHOOD AS A WHOLE, AS STATED HE DISCUSSED THIS WITH ABOUT, UH, WEBINARS AND OUR MOST RECENT ACTUALLY MEETING VIA ZOOM AT THAT TIME, THE ALCOHOL INTO WOULD NOT DIGRESS FROM THE ORIGINAL PLAN FOR A PRIVATE PARK AND BYPASS RESIDENT ALTERNATIVE SUGGESTIONS.

THE COMMISSION HAD RECOMMENDED TO CONSIDER CLAIMING THE DEVELOPER WOULD NOT ALLOW ANY DEVIATION, WHICH ILLUSTRATES THAT SENSE OF ENTITLEMENT AND UNWILLINGNESS TO COMPROMISE AS POINTED OUT BY THE COMMISSION ON MAY 11TH.

AGAIN, I URGE YOU TO VOTE AGAINST THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PRIVATE PARK, IF ANYTHING MAKES THIS PARK PUBLIC.

AND I THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

OKAY.

UH, WITH THAT, I THINK I'VE, UM, THAT'S ABOUT A MINUTE.

WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND MOVE ON TO THE NEXT, UM, SPEAKERS, SCOTT PETERS, STAR SIX TO UNMUTE

[00:40:11]

SCOTT PETERS.

SURE.

I DON'T BELIEVE I HAVE HIM ON.

OKAY.

UH, LET'S GO AHEAD AND UH, TRY, UH, ADRIANA, UH, THERESE.

OH, I'M HERE.

I'M HERE.

SORRY, MR. PETERS.

OKAY, GO AHEAD.

YEAH.

SO THIS IS A SKY HERE ON TOWER TRAIL.

UH, I'M AGAINST THE PRIVATIZATION OF THE PARK.

HOWEVER, THERE WILL BE A PART.

IT SHOULD BE A PUBLIC PARK.

THIS PARK SHOULD BE INCLUSIVE TO ALL OF THE EAST SIDE COMMUNITIES.

WE ARE NOT A PRIVATE COMMUNITY AREA.

NEIGHBORHOODS ARE NOT IN FAVOR OF THIS PRIVATE PARK.

AND WE MUST THINK ABOUT THE CREDIT.

GOOD OF ALL OF THE EAST SIDE COMMUNITIES.

THIS PARK IS NOT ISOLATED.

IT'S ONLY A HUNDRED FEET FROM THE 51ST STREET THIS EASILY ACCESSIBLE, AND IT WOULD BE BEST BENEFIT AS THE PUBLIC PARK.

I HOPE YOU VOTE AGAINST THE PRIVATE PARK AND FEEL THIS PARKS SHOULD BE PUBLIC AND BENEFIT THE EAST SIDE COMMUNITIES AS A WHOLE.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

IF YOU HAVE, YOU HAVE AN OVERWHELMING SUPPORT FOR THIS PARK, BUT PLEASE MAKE SURE THIS IS PUBLIC.

SO, SO, SO IT SUPPORTS ALL INDIVIDUALS.

THANK YOU.

OKAY.

NOW, UM, I GUESS ADRIANA PEREZ.

STAR SIX.

OKAY.

THANKS.

UH, YES, I N A CAUSE THE PARK, BUT I WANTED TO SAY OF THINGS THAT TRIGGER MANY CHURCHES NEED TO KNOW.

SO WE WERE INFORMED IN THE MEETING THAT WHEN, UM, THE DEVELOPER WERE A CONTACT TO ASK THEM IF THEY WERE TO BE WILLING TO DO A PUBLIC PARK INSTEAD OF A PRIVATE PARK, THEY TAYLOR MORRISON, WHO IS THE ONE WHO IS WILLING TO PAY FOR THE INSURANCE AND ALL THE LIABILITY OF VIVID, A PRIVATE PARK.

THEY ARE NO WILLING TO, UH, ACCEPT A, CHANGING THE CONTRACT TO MAKE IT AT A PUBLIC PARK BECAUSE OF THAT, WE ARE BOUND IN A CONTRACT WITH THEM TO US, THE ONLY OPTION OF A, UH, PRIVATE CLERK.

UH, I WA I REGIONALLY HEAVY PAVER IS OF NO HAVING THE, UH, PRIVATE PARK BECAUSE OF ALL DID I EVER REALLY BE? I, ONCE I END UP AFRAID THAT ONCE THE DEVELOPER IS GONE AND THEY, 150 OWNERS ARE INSIDE IN YUKON, THEY WILL WANT TO THE MILK FOR THE INSURANCE AND THE OTHER ITEMS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU.

UH, NEXT WE HAVE URSULA CARTER STAR SIX, SEVEN, EIGHT.

I THINK WE HAVE SOMEBODY THERE.

UH, URSULA CARTER, ARE YOU THERE STAR SIX 10 NEED.

AND DO, DO YOU KNOW FOR HAVING, UH, IF, UH, TO UNMUTE YOURSELF, PRESS STAR, YOU ARE NO LONGER MUTED.

SURE.

COMMISSION LAYS ON, HOWEVER, I'M NOT SURE IF I HAVE MS. CARTER ON THE LINE.

OKAY.

UH, COMMISSIONER COPS, DID YOU HAVE A QUESTION? NO, I WAS.

I'M GONNA MAKE A MOTION THAT WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING IF MS. CARTER IS INDEED NOT ON.

YEAH.

SO, UH, MR. RIVERA, DO WE NEED TO MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ONE CHURCH? SO THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.

YOU JUST HEARD A TESTIMONY, YOU CAN NOW MOVE TO DEBATE.

OKAY.

SO I WILL OFFER, UH, THAT WE MOVE INTO DEBATE, UM, IN LESS ANYONE HAS QUESTIONS, BUT, UM, MY PREFERENCE IS TO GO AHEAD AND MOVE INTO DEBATE.

UH, COMMISSIONER COPPS.

I'LL MAKE A MOTION IF WE'RE READY TO DO THAT.

DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF THE COMMISSION OR ANY OF THE SPEAKERS, COMMISSIONER DESIRE? SURE.

I DO HAVE FEW QUICK QUESTIONS.

OKAY.

[00:45:01]

ALL RIGHT.

I'M GOING TO GO ON TO ALLOW THE QUESTIONS.

GO AHEAD AND, UH, UH, COMMISSIONER ZAR.

UH, LET'S JUST TRY TO KEEP IT IN SHORT.

AND, AND, UH, WHO WOULD YOU LIKE TO ASK A QUESTION OF, THANK YOU, CHAIR.

I HAD A FEW QUESTIONS FOR MR. CREEL.

UM, I, I THINK THE FIRST ONE WAS, UM, I KNOW I'VE HAD A SEPARATE CONVERSATION WITH YOU AND YOU HAD MENTIONED CERTAIN ACTIONS THAT YOU WERE TAKING TO ENSURE THAT OUR PUBLIC SAFETY CONCERNS THAT WE HAD TALKED ABOUT LAST TIME ARE TAKEN CARE OF.

CAN YOU PLEASE SPEAK TO HOW YOU'RE ADDRESSING THE PUBLIC SAFETY CONCERNS THAT WE DRESSED OUT OF ASK PERMISSION? YOU HEAR ME? YES.

GREAT.

UH, THANK YOU FOR SHARING AS ARE, UH, FOR THE QUESTION WE, UH, WE'VE TALKED ABOUT A NUMBER OF THINGS THAT CAN BE DONE TO ADDRESS SOME OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY CONCERNS PRIMARILY.

UM, THE, THE BIGGEST THING THAT WE COULD DO TO ADDRESS THE CONCERN THAT COMMISSIONER CONLEY HAD RAISED ABOUT A, UM, UNAWARE MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC, FINDING THEMSELVES ON THIS TRACK, UM, UNAWARE OF ITS STATUS OR THE RULES, AND THEN FINDING THEMSELVES IN A CONFRONTATION THAT, THAT ENDED IN UNPLEASANT MANNER.

UH THERE'S WE CAN REALLY ONLY THINK OF ONE WAY TO MITIGATE THAT CONCERN.

AND THAT IS TO, UH, INSTALL SOME SENSES ON THE SHORTER SIDES OF THE PROPOSED TRACT.

IT'D BE ABOUT 55 FEET ON ONE SIDE AND ABOUT 70 FEET ON THE OTHER SIDE, AND RESTRICT ACCESS TO A SERIES OF GATES WHERE THE FINES ARE CLEARLY POSTED IN TWO LANGUAGES ON THOSE GATES AND LIT AT NIGHT.

SO THAT, UM, AT, AT A MINIMUM, UH, THERE WOULD BE AN AWARENESS OF THE PRIVATE STATUS OF THE PARK.

UH, AND IT WOULD TAKE A MORE PHYSICAL, UM, EFFORT TO BYPASS, UH, THOSE, THOSE PARK RULES AND SIGNS.

UM, THAT'S SOMETHING THAT HAD BEEN CONSIDERED PREVIOUSLY IN DISCUSSIONS IN NEGOTIATION, BUT WE OPTED OUT OF JUST BECAUSE THE SENSES DO GIVE A PARTICULAR, UH, FEELING TO THE SPACE AND WE DIDN'T REALLY WANT THAT.

BUT IF THAT HELPS ADDRESS THE COMMISSION'S CONCERNS, THAT'S SOMETHING WE'D BE WILLING TO ACCOMMODATE.

THANK YOU.

SO OUTSIDE A FOLLOWUP QUESTION, I, THERE WAS SOME CONSIDERATION OF HAVING SOME SORT OF ONLINE SIGN-UP SYSTEM, WHEREBY IF THERE ARE OFFENSES, A SPECIFIED GATES WHEREBY THE DO NEIGHBORHOODS, FOLKS CAN SIGN UP, UM, YOU USE THE PARKING, PLEASE SPEAK TO THAT A LITTLE BIT.

YEAH, ABSOLUTELY.

SO, UH, ONE OF THE, ONE OF THE ITEMS THAT WAS DISCUSSED WITH THE DEVELOPER WAS HAVING A RESERVATION SYSTEM SUCH THAT, UH, RESIDENTS OF THE COMMUNITY COULD RESERVE THE PAVILION IN THE PARK FOR LARGER GROUP EVENTS.

THOSE GROUP EVENTS WOULD HAVE A SEPARATE SET OF RULES AND POSSIBLY A DEPOSIT ASSOCIATED WITH THEM JUST TO ENSURE THAT THOSE GROUPS DON'T, UM, ABUSE THAT PRIVILEGE.

BUT, UH, YOU KNOW, THERE WAS, THERE WAS A SUGGESTION THAT PERHAPS THAT RESERVATION SYSTEM COULD BE EXTENDED TO SOME OF THE, THE, UH, NEARBY AREA, UH, COMMUNITY GROUPS.

YEAH, LET'S SAY THE OTHER NEIGHBORHOOD GROUPS OR CHURCH GROUPS OR HOBBY GROUPS OR FARMER'S MARKETS OR SOMETHING TO THAT EFFECT WHERE THERE'S THESE BENEFITS, THESE COMMUNITY GROUPS THAT ARE BRINGING A BROADER COMMUNITY BENEFIT.

AND THEY WOULD ESSENTIALLY BE THE INVITED GUESTS OF THE COMMUNITY AT THAT POINT.

SO, UH, W I CONFIRMED WITH OUR ATTORNEY THAT WOULD NOT REQUIRE A AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT AND THEREBY WOULD GENERALLY BE AGREEABLE.

I KNOW, UM, THERE ARE A FEW FOLKS THAT STATED SOME OPPOSITION TO THAT.

SO I THINK THERE, YOU KNOW, IT WOULD BE A LITTLE BIT OF A PUZZLE SOLVER FOR CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY AND, AND, UH, MEMBER PARTIES, THAT'S THE AGREEMENT, BUT GENERALLY SPEAKING, UM, YOU KNOW, IT, ISN'T A ACCOMPLISHABLE, UM, UH, ITEM.

AND ONE OTHER QUESTION, WHICH WAS, UM, I KNOW YOU HAD EXPLAINED THIS LAST TIME AS WELL, ESSENTIALLY, YOU CLARIFIED THAT NOBODY FROM YOUR OWN NEIGHBORHOOD WILL HAVE TO PAY IN ANY ATRIAL FEES OR ANY KIND OF FEES FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE PARK.

CAN YOU PLEASE CONFIRM THAT? BECAUSE I KNOW THAT IS A CONCERN THAT WE HEARD FROM EMAIL.

ABSOLUTELY.

UM, SO I CAN CONFIRM 100% THAT THROUGH HOA DUES OR ANY OTHER MEANS, UH, OUR COMMUNITY WILL NOT BE PAYING THE BURDEN FOR THIS PARK.

UH, I'LL, I'LL KIND OF BREAK THAT DOWN FIRST OFF THE INSURANCE, UM, WHICH IS PROBABLY THE BIGGEST, THERE'LL BE INSURANCE AND MAINTENANCE, UH, BEING THE TWO BIGGEST ITEMS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PART, THE INSURANCE WILL BE REIMBURSED EQUALLY ON THE, BY THE

[00:50:01]

DEVELOPER AND ASSOCIATED HOA.

UH, WHAT THAT'LL LOOK LIKE IS US GETTING TWO QUOTES FOR OUR COMMUNITY.

ONE WITH THE PARK ONE WITHOUT THE PARK AND THE DEVELOPER WON'T BE PAYING THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THOSE TWO QUOTES ON AN ANNUAL BASIS.

IN ADDITION TO REVERSE US ON AN ANNUAL BASIS AFTER THE PROPERTY TAXES ASSOCIATED WITH THE PARK, AND THEN MAINTENANCE IS COVERED IN FULL, INCLUDING THE SENSORS ON EITHER SIDE OF THE PARK, BY THE DEVELOPER.

SO THERE, UH, LASTLY UTILITIES, UH, FOR THE PARK LIGHTING AND WATER FOR IRRIGATION IS ALL BEING COVERED BY THE DEVELOPER.

SO THERE IS LITERALLY NOT ONE ASPECT OF THE ONGOING COST OF THIS PARK THAT IS GOING TO BE SHOULDERED BY THE SUN HILLS COMMUNITY.

THE, OUR CONTRIBUTION WAS OUR DETENTION PONDS AND THE LAND ITSELF.

AND I THINK IT WAS JUST HAVING THIS AMOUNT OF TIME LEFT.

I JUST WANTED TO ALSO ASK ABOUT THIS ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPOTS REQUEST, IF THAT WAS CONSIDERED, IT WAS I'LL, I'LL HAVE TO DEFER, AND I'M NOT SURE THEY'RE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK TO THE ENGINEER OR EVEN STAFF.

I KNOW FROM GENERAL CONVERSATIONS THAT, UH, THIS USE DOES NOT REQUIRE ANY PARKING.

THE PARKING THAT WAS PROPOSED WAS ACTUALLY AT THE REQUEST OF FINISHED HILLS, UM, ORIGINALLY, OR CURRENTLY, I SHOULD SAY THERE'S A DEAD END TURN AROUND THAT WAS USED FOR FIRE TURNAROUND AT THE NORTH AND SOUTH END OF THIS TRACK, UH, THAT WAS INTENDED ORIGINALLY TO BE PARKING, BUT STAFF REQUESTED THAT THAT TURNAROUND BE REMOVED IN THAT PARALLEL PARKING BE PUT IN ITS PLACE.

THE REASON WE ASKED FOR THAT PARKING IS BECAUSE THIS, UM, COMMUNITY ADJACENT TO US THAT'S BEING BUILT HAS VERY LIMITED PARKING ON STREET PARKING.

THEY HAVE PARKING GARAGES IN DRIVEWAYS, BUT NOTHING ON THE STREET.

AND SO WE EXPECT THERE'S GOING TO BE SOME SPILLOVER FROM JASON COMMUNITY.

WE WANTED THOSE PARKING SPACES THERE TO PROVIDE A LITTLE BIT OF OVERFLOW PARKING FOR THE ADJACENT COMMUNITY BEFORE THEY KIND OF START POURING ONTO DIFFERENT HILL STREETS.

UH, THAT'S FIVE MINUTES.

SO WE NEED TO GO AND CUT OUT THERE.

DO WE HAVE ANY MORE QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONER CUFFS? I WAS GOING TO MAKE A MOTION IF THERE'S NO QUESTION.

ALL RIGHT.

LOOKING AROUND THE ROOM.

DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY MORE QUESTIONS? IT'LL BE REALLY QUICK.

UM, SO I JUST WANTED TO, UM, FOLLOW UP IN THE SIMILAR LINE OF QUESTIONING THAT, UM, COMMISSIONERS ARE HAD.

SO IN OUR LAST MEETING, I THINK WHEN WE WERE DISCUSSING THE CONCERNS ABOUT A PRIVATE PARK AND WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF LET'S SAY A TEENAGER FROM A NEIGHBOR, UH, YOU KNOW, FROM A NEIGHBORHOOD NEARBY, IS THERE WITH FRIENDS AND THE COPS ARE CALLED, THIS MIGHT BE A TEENAGER OF COLOR, RIGHT.

AND, UM, THEY COULD BE MURDERED, RIGHT.

JUST TO PUT IT OUT THERE AS CLEARLY AS POSSIBLE THAT, YOU KNOW, HAVING GROWN UP IN AUSTIN AND, UM, GOING AROUND AS A TEENAGER WITH MY FRIENDS OF COLOR, HAVING A PARTNER WHO IS A MAN OF COLOR AND HAS HAD THE COPS CALLED ON HIM WHEN I'VE BEEN WITH HIM, YOU KNOW, THAT'S, TO ME IS A REAL CONCERN AND A REAL REASON TO HAVE POSE THAT TO THE COMMUNITY THAT YOU ALL COULD TAKE SOME TIME TO RECONSIDER MAKING IT, YOU KNOW, A MORE PUBLICLY OPEN SPACE.

BUT I DO REMEMBER, I DO UNDERSTAND THAT YOU ALL WOULD HAVE TO GO THROUGH A WHOLE PROCESS.

SO I GUESS, AND, AND I, I RESPECT THAT THAT WOULD BE WHOLE ADDITIONAL PROCESS FOR YOU ALL.

SO I GUESS MY QUESTION IS, UM, WOULD YOU ALL SEE IT AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO ADDING FENCING, UM, OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT TO JUST KIND OF HAVE A, I WOULD HOPE SOME KIND OF CONVERSATIONS IN THE COMMUNITY OR STANDARD, UM, TO, YOU KNOW, UNLESS THERE'S A SERIOUS DISTURBANCE, IF SOMEBODY SEEMS TO NOT BE FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD, NOT NECESSARILY THE FIRST REACTION TO BE, TO ASK THEM TO LEAVE OR CALL THE POLICE, IF THEY'RE NOT CREATING A DISTURBANCE OF SOME KIND.

I REMEMBER THAT WAS WHAT YOU ALL SAID.

YOU YOU'VE GOT, THE RESPONSE WOULD BE, UM, WITHIN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD THAT UNLESS THERE WAS A DISTURBANCE, YOU ALL, WOULDN'T ESCALATE TO CALL THE POLICE, BUT I JUST KIND OF WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU ALL.

UM, I GUESS THE SAME MR. CREEL, IF, IF THAT'S SOMETHING THAT YOU'RE, YOU'VE HEARD FROM NEIGHBORS THAT THEY WOULD, BUT THAT'S THE KIND OF RESPONSE THEY WOULD HAVE, OR IF, IF YOU'VE GOTTEN LOOKING MORE FENCING PROTECTION FROM PEOPLE COMING FROM THE OUTSIDE.

YEAH.

THANK YOU FOR THE COMMENT.

I WANTED TO CLARIFY A COUPLE OF THINGS.

ONE COMPLETELY AGREE WITH THE SENTIMENTS WE'VE SEEN IT HAPPEN.

UM, YOU KNOW, FORTUNATELY NOT VERY MUCH IN AUSTIN, BUT DEFINITELY, UH, THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY.

AND, AND I WANT TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE REALITY OF THAT.

UM, I DO WANT TO SAY THAT I CAN SPEAK FOR A LARGE NUMBER OF NEIGHBORS IN SENATE

[00:55:01]

HILLS COMMUNITY IN SAYING THAT THAT IS NOT THE TYPE OF COMMUNITY THAT WE ARE.

UM, WE DO HAVE 153 HOUSEHOLDS, SO I CANNOT SPEAK FOR EVERYBODY.

UM, I KNOW THAT THAT IS A SOCIETY WIDE PROBLEM, UM, THAT EXISTS TODAY.

AND I CAN, UNFORTUNATELY, I WISH THERE'S SOME WAY I COULD HAVE CONTROL OF THAT.

I CAN SPEAK FOR A LARGE MAJORITY OF RESIDENTS AND SAY THAT THAT IS NOT WHO WE ARE.

UM, THERE HAVE BEEN CONVERSATIONS, UM, NOT, NOT EVEN NECESSARILY ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PARK, BUT JUST IN GENERAL ABOUT PEOPLE, YOU KNOW, IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD, WALKING DOWN THE SIDEWALK AND HOW, WHAT THE RIGHT APPROACH TO, YOU KNOW, BOTH KEEPING AN EYE ON THAT PERSON.

IF THEY, IF, IF THEY SEEM TO BE COMMITTING A CRIME AND BEING PREPARED TO CALL THE POLICE, BUT OTHERWISE, YOU KNOW, MAKING SURE THAT YOU ARE NOT, UH, IMPOSING ANY BIAS OR, UH, YOU KNOW, UNDULY, UM, CALLING THE POLICE AND SOMEBODY WHO'S MINDING THEIR OWN BUSINESS.

AND THERE'S BEEN A SPACE THAT THEY ARE WELL WITHIN MY RIGHT TO BE, UH, THOSE CONVERSATIONS CERTAINLY BEEN HAD IN OUR COMMUNITY.

AND WE CAN CERTAINLY ASSURE YOU, WE WILL CONTINUE TO HAVE THOSE CONVERSATIONS AS A COMMUNITY AS, AS WE NEED TO HAVE THOSE CONVERSATIONS AS A WHOLE, UH, AS A CITY AND AS A COUNTRY AS WELL.

UM, THE FENCING IDEA THAT WAS PURELY REACTIVE, IF THAT'S, IF THAT'S SOMETHING THE COMMISSION DOESN'T WANT, BUT SOMETHING WE, WE CERTAINLY ARE WILLING TO DO WITHOUT IT, WASN'T IN THE ORIGINAL PROPOSAL.

AND I WANT TO MAKE SURE TO EMPHASIZE THIS IS NOT PROTECT THE RESIDENTS AS SENATE HILLS WOULD THE USERS OF THE PARK.

THE GOAL OF THE FENCING IS PURELY TO PROTECT AN UNAWARE UNASSUMING MEMBER OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC AND ENSURE THAT THEY ARE AS INFORMED AS POSSIBLE BEFORE MAKING A DECISION.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

YEAH, IT WOULDN'T BE MY PERSONAL PREFERENCE TO PUT UP FENCING.

I THINK POSTING THE RULES WOULD BE MORE THAN SUFFICIENT.

AND IF YOU ALL ARE ALREADY HAVING THOSE KINDS OF CONVERSATIONS ABOUT BIAS, UM, I'LL JUST PASS ON AN ADDITIONAL RESOURCE, BUT THAT YOU MIGHT, YOU MAY OR MAY NOT ALREADY BE AWARE OF, BUT I'LL, I'LL MAKE SURE TO EMAIL THAT TO YOU ALL IN CASE MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY WANT TO PARTICIPATE.

THAT'D BE WONDERFUL.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

UH, DO YOU HAVE ANY MORE QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT.

HEARING NONE, UH, COMMISSIONER COSTS TO DO THAT MOTION.

OKAY.

YEAH.

I JUST WANTED TO MAKE THE MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A PARK, WHICH IS A COMMUNITY RECREATION PRIVATE USE WITH THREE CONDITIONS, IF I'M ALLOWED.

UH, ONE OF THOSE CONDITIONS IS WHAT I MENTIONED AT THE LAST MEETING, UH, UH, PROVIDE FOR AT LEAST ONE, UH, SPACE THAT IS ACCESSIBLE, UH, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TEXAS ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS.

I BELIEVE THE SITE PLAN WE SAW SHOWED FOUR PARKING SPACES BEING PROVIDED A SECOND CONDITION BEING TO PROVIDE A, UH, FENCE AROUND THIS PARK, UM, THAT IS NO TALLER THAN THREE AND A HALF FEET AND AT LEAST 50% VISIBLE THROUGH THE FENCE.

UM, AND THEN THE THIRD CONDITION IS TO HAVE THE PRIVATE NATURE OF THE PARK WELL POSTED, UH, UH, ON THE GATES OF THAT FENCE.

AND I AM MORE THAN HAPPY TO ACCEPT FRIENDLY AMENDMENTS IF WE THINK WE CAN IMPROVE UPON THAT TO, TO ADDRESS ANY OF OUR CONCERNS.

AND I BELIEVE THOSE THREE CONDITIONS POSSIBLY WERE AGREED BY THE APPLICANT.

I, I'M NOT A HUNDRED PERCENT SURE ON THAT.

SO COULD YOU STATE IT? YOU WANT ONE, UH, ADA PARKING PLACE IS WHAT YOU'RE CORRECT.

ONE, ONE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPOT.

IT THERE, CORRECT THAT IT ISN'T TECHNICALLY REQUIRED, BUT THE PARKING IS SO CLOSE TO THE PARK THAT IT JUST SEEMS LIKE WE NEED AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPOT AND IT WOULD NOT BE AN A SIGNIFICANT EVENT.

OKAY.

SO, UH, REAL QUICK IS THE APPLICANT THERE ARE THESE, ARE THESE ITEMS THAT YOU WOULD SUPPORT? YEAH.

SO THE FIRST TWO CONDITIONS, UM, OR SORRY, THE CONDITION OF THE ACCESSIBLE SPACE, I CAN'T SAY A HUNDRED PERCENT, EXACTLY WHAT THAT WOULD REQUIRE.

UH, IN GENERAL, I KNOW, UM, THE ENGINEER WAS ON THE CALL LAST TIME.

IT WAS PROBABLY LISTENING IN, BUT IT'S PROBABLY NOT SIGNED UP TO SPEAK.

UH, THE, UM, THE DEVELOPER MAY ALSO BE ON AS WELL.

I THINK THEY'RE, THEY WERE GENERALLY KIND OF, UM, PREDISPOSED NOT TO ACCEPT THE CONDITION OF, UH, AN ACCESSIBLE SPACE, BUT YOU KNOW, WHAT, WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO MAYBE SUGGEST ON THE CONDITION IS, IS IF YOU REQUEST THAT WE CONSIDER THAT WE WILL CONSIDER IT.

AND IF, IF IT IS VIABLE AND DOES NOT, YOU'LL CALL THE MAJOR ITERATION

[01:00:01]

OF THE SITE PLAN, THEN WE WILL CERTAINLY, YOU KNOW, DO EVERYTHING IN OUR POWER TO ENSURE THAT GETS IMPLEMENTED THE OTHER TWO CONDITIONS.

CERTAINLY AGREEABLE.

OKAY.

ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU.

SO, UM, IF WE, EVERYONE, DO WE NEED ANY CLARIFYING QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION BEFORE WE MOVE INTO A SECOND, A FINISHER? BIZARRE.

YOU NEED A CLARIFYING QUESTION.

HOPING STAFF CAN TELL US WHAT KIND OF CONDITIONS WE CAN PLACE ON THIS MOTION.

OKAY.

UM, YEAH, WE DON'T, UH, MR. RIVERA, I'VE SEEN HER NOTICE.

DO YOU SAY WE DON'T HAVE STAFF WITH US TODAY? UH, THAT'S A GOOD MESSAGE FROM THE PREVIOUS INQUIRY OF WHETHER THEY ALRIGHT.

DO WE, UM, ARE WE AT A POINT WHERE WE CAN ENTERTAIN, UH, UH, TECHNICAL QUESTIONS OF STAFF? I THINK WE CAN, WE HAVEN'T, NOBODY'S MADE A SECOND.

SO DO WE HAVE STAFF AVAILABLE, UM, FOR A QUESTION SURE.

WHILE WE'RE WAITING TO HEAR FROM STAFF AND I, THE REASON I ASKED THIS QUESTION WAS BECAUSE I WOULD LIKE TO SEE IF, CAN I SHARE COX'S, I MEAN, YOU BOTH DO ADDING SOMETHING TO THAT MOTION.

UM, THAT'S WHY I WAS CHECKING, BUT I DIDN'T KNOW IF THAT WAS EVEN POSSIBLE OR NOT.

AND WHILE WE'RE WAITING FOR STAFF, I THOUGHT IT JUST MENTIONED THAT, BUT ESSENTIALLY I'M TRYING TO SEE IF WE COULD ALSO ADD TO THE MOTION THAT WE WOULD ASK THAT THE PARKING MADE AVAILABLE TO LOCAL COMMUNITY GROUPS IN THE AREA, THROUGH THE PARK BOOKING SYSTEM, UH, THE CASE MANAGER, UM, I AM ON THE PHONE CALL.

WE ALSO HAVE TRANSPORTATION STAFF AVAILABLE, HARDEN STAFF AND CITY LEGAL AVAILABLE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS.

OKAY.

THAT'S GREAT.

THANKS TO YOU.

AND SO YOUR QUESTION COMMISSIONER, IT'S OUR IS WHETHER WE CAN, UH, MAKE A INCLUDE IN THIS MOTION THAT, UH, THE PARKING, UH, THE PARK WE MADE AVAILABLE TO LOCAL COMMUNITY GROUPS, UM, I GUESS, IS THAT UPON APPROVAL OF THE HOA, UM, THAT WOULD BE TO THE ONLINE BOOKING SYSTEM, WHICH IS KIND OF SOME PART OF AN APPROVAL PROCESS.

OKAY.

UH, I GUESS STAFF, IS THAT SOMETHING THAT WE CAN, UM, UH, PUT, UH, MAKE PART OF THIS CONDITIONAL USE AGREEMENT? YES.

YOU CAN, UM, MAKE THAT A CONDITION.

IT IS, I WILL SAY THAT IS ALSO SOMETHING THAT, UM, WE WOULD JUST PUT ON THE PERMIT, UM, AND NOT SURE HOW ENFORCEABLE THAT IS.

UM, BUT IT IS THE CONDITIONER.

WE CAN PUT IT ON THE PERMIT AND, UM, I'M MORE THAN HAPPY TO AMEND MY MOTION TO INCLUDE A FOURTH CONDITION.

AND, AND, AND I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S EXACTLY WHAT YOU'RE, YOU'RE GOING FOR COMMISSIONERS ARE, BUT, UH, THE FOURTH CONDITION BEING THAT THE PARK BE MADE AVAILABLE TO VIVEK OTHER CIVIC GROUPS OUTSIDE OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD, UH, AS APPROVED BY THE, UH, NEIGHBORHOOD HOA.

'CAUSE, I, I DON'T THINK WE CAN DEFINE AS PART OF THIS, EVEN IF WE WANTED TO EXACTLY WHAT GROUP IT SHOULDN'T BE ALLOWED AND NOT ALLOWED TO USE THE PARK.

UH, SO, SO I, THE, THE, ULTIMATELY THE AUTHORITY FOR THAT, SINCE THIS IS A PRIVATE PARK AND, AND THE ENFORCEMENT OF THAT WOULD BE THROUGH THE HOA.

UH, AND SO THEY WOULD HAVE ULTIMATE APPROVAL OF, OF WHICH GROUPS, UH, COULD, COULD USE THE PARK AND, UH, FISHER HOWARD.

DID YOU HAVE, UH, A QUESTION OR CLARIFYING QUESTION BEFORE WE MOVE TO FURTHER ON THE NOTION? ALL RIGHT, SO WE'VE GOT QUIET.

I WOULD LIKE FOR, UH, COMMISSIONER COX, I THINK, COULD YOU REPEAT YOUR MOTION? IT'S I THINK YOU PROBABLY HAVE IT WRITTEN DOWN SOMEWHERE, AND SO, AND THAT WILL BE SEEKING A SECOND AFTER YOU REPEAT IT ONE MORE TIME WITH THE ADDED FOURTH ITEM.

I DO NOT HAVE IT WRITTEN DOWN, BUT I WILL TRY MY BEST TO REPEAT IT.

I MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT THE PARK, WHICH IS A COMMUNITY RECREATIONAL PRIVATE USE WITH FOUR CONDITIONS.

[01:05:01]

THE FIRST CONDITION BEING THAT AT LEAST ONE OF THE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED ADJACENT TO THE PARK IS ACCESSIBLE.

UM, IN ACCORDANCE WITH TEXAS ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS, I CAN SPEAK MORE TO THAT AFTER A SECOND, UH, SECOND CONDITION BEING THAT A FENCE BE CONSTRUCTED, UH, AROUND THE PARK OR THE TWO ENDS OF THE PARK, UM, THAT IS NO TALLER THAN THREE AND A HALF FEET, AND AT LEAST 50% VISIBLE THROUGH THE FENCE.

THE THIRD CONDITION BEING, UM, THAT THE FENCE IS WELL MARKED AT THE GATE LOCATIONS THAT THIS IS A, THIS IS A PRIVATE PARK AND THE RULES OF THE PARK.

UM, AND THE FOURTH CONDITION BEING THAT, UH, OUTSIDE CIVIC GROUPS ARE ALLOWED TO USE THE PARK, UH, AS APPROVED BY THE HOA.

OKAY.

DO I HAVE A SECOND, UH, COMMISSIONER SECOND SET, MOTION, UH, COMMISSIONER THOUGHTS.

YOU WANT TO SPEAK TO YOUR MOTION? YEAH, SO, UM, I FELT LIKE THIS WAS A NO BRAINER, ALTHOUGH I, I DO THINK THAT THE POINTS THAT WERE BROUGHT UP AT THE LAST MEETING, UH, WERE REALLY IMPORTANT.

AND, AND OBVIOUSLY IN MY POSITION, YOU CAN SEE MY FACE.

I DON'T, I DON'T, I'M NOT PERSONALLY AWARE, UM, UH, OF, OF MANY OF THE THINGS THAT, THAT ARE BLACK AND