Apr 27, 2022 Building and Standards Commission

THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER.

CARERO WE ACTUALLY CAN JUST BARELY HEAR YOU SAID GIRL.

I DON'T KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON.

PEREIRA DISTRICT EIGHT.

IT'S STILL REALLY, REALLY QUIET.

SO THAT WILL PROBABLY BE A PROBLEM LATER ON.

AND I DON'T KNOW WHY YOUR MICROPHONE IS PICKING UP.

UH, COMMISSIONER MUELLER, LIZ MUELLER, DISTRICT FIVE.

[PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL ]

BEFORE THE CASES ARE CALLED, THE COMMISSION WILL ENTERTAIN PUBLIC COMMUNICATION ON ITEMS THAT ARE NOT ON SPIKE'S AGENDA.

EACH SPEAKER WILL BE ALLOTTED THREE MINUTES OR SIX MINUTES FOR ANYONE REQUIRING AN INTERPRETATION SERVICES.

A TIME THE COMMISSION WILL CONDUCT A HEARING FOR EACH CASE LIKE A POSTED AGENDA.

THE COMMISSION WILL CONSIDER 12 CASES.

THE CASES WILL BE CONSIDERED IN THE ORDER IN WHICH THEY APPEAR ON THE AGENDA.

HOWEVER, THE COMMISSION MAY TAKE A CASE OUT OF ORDER.

IF IT IS APPROPRIATE, ALL ATTENDEES THAT THIS HEARING ARE REQUIRED TO OBSERVE APPROPRIATE DEFORMED INSTABILITY.

SO AS NOT TO APPEAR THE PROFICIENT ABILITY TO CONDUCT THE COMMISSION'S COORDINATOR FELONY TOPIC, WE'LL CALL IT EACH CASE ON THE AGENDA, FOLLOWED BY TESTIMONY.

AUSTIN CODE STAFF WILL ALSO BE AVAILABLE TO GET YOUR QUESTIONS.

WHEN YOUR CASE IS CALLED YOU REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PROPERTY, MOST COMFORTABLE WITH TAKE A SEAT NEAR THE PODIUM AND THAT TO BE READY TO HEAR THIS EVENING.

OBJECTION, TO RECORD THE TABLE RIGHT HERE.

RIGHT? OKAY.

APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM THE MARCH 23RD REGULAR MEETING IS HOW WAS THE FEBRUARY 11TH SPECIAL HALL MEETING, WHICH WAS THE ESE RETREAT BURRITOS.

AND THE CITY WILL PRESENT ITS EVIDENCE THAT WITNESSES FIRST YOU OR YOUR REPRESENTATIVE MAY ASK THE WITNESSES ABOUT THEIR TESTIMONY.

AFTER THE CITY HAS PRESENTED ITS EVIDENCE OF WITNESSES.

YOU WILL HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT YOUR OWN WITNESSES AND EVIDENCE.

YOU WILL HAVE A TOTAL OF FIVE MINUTES TO PRESENT YOUR PLACE.

WHEN THE TIMER INDICATES THAT YOUR TIME HAS EXPIRED, YOU MUST FINISH YOUR SENTENCE AND CONCLUDE YOUR VISITATION AND OUR DESIGNATED TIMEKEEPER.

THIS IS THAT YOU, AFTER YOU AND THE CITY PRESENTED EVIDENCE AND WITNESSES, PERMISSION TO ASK QUESTIONS THAT EITHER SIDE AFTER THE COMMISSION METHODS ASK QUESTIONS, I WILL ALLOW OTHER INTERESTED VERSUS WAR PRESENT TO OFFER RELEVANT TESTIMONY ABOUT THE CASE.

BOTH SIDES OF THE COMMISSION MAY ASK QUESTIONS OF ANY ADDITIONAL WITNESSES.

AFTER ALL THE EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY IS CONCLUDED.

THE COMMISSION WILL DISCUSS THE CASE AND THROW IT ON A DECISION.

THE CONVENTIONS DECISION WILL BE ANNOUNCED TONIGHT.

AND A COPY OF THE DECISION FOR THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSION IS FINAL AND BINDING.

IT MUST APPEAL TO DISTRICT COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS AS PROVIDED IN THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE.

IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS PROCEDURE IS ASK YOUR QUESTION THAT YOUR CASES, CASES, CORRECT WITNESSES TESTIFY UNDER OATH.

SO ANY PERSON THAT WANTS TO PRESENT TESTIMONY BEFORE THE COMMISSION, IN ANY CASE, INCLUDING THOSE WHO ARE PROMOTING IT, PLEASE STAND AND RAISE YOUR RIGHT HANDS THAT YOU MAY BE SWORN IN THIS LOOKING DID EACH OF YOU SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT THE TESTIMONY YOU WILL PROVIDE THIS EVENING IS THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH.

IF SO, PLEASE SIGNIFY BY SAYING I DO AND NOTHING FURTHER.

WE WILL PROCEED TO CONSIDER THE AGENDA ITEMS WITH THE CONDITION FOR STATE.

UM, BEFORE WE MOVE ON TO THE CASES, IF WE COULD

[00:05:01]

YOU DON'T SHARE A LOT OF PERMISSION NUMBERS.

WE'RE GOING TO TAKE A GOOD PREVIEW.

HOPEFULLY YOU ALREADY LIKE TO TAKE MOTION.

THIS WAS FOR ELECTRIC WEEKS LAST MONTH AND THE SPECIAL CALL.

AND YOU WERE, AS LONG AS YOU READ THE MINUTES, YOU CAN PRACTICE.

[APPROVAL OF MINUTES ]

I'M SURE I'LL MOVE TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM THE MARCH 20TH OR REGULAR MEETING.

AND THE MINUTES FROM THE FEBRUARY 11TH, 2022, IS THERE A SECOND? I'LL SIT DOWN.

WAIT, SHOULD HAVE TWO SECONDS.

UH, ALL IN FAVOR OF APPROVING THE MINUTES FROM THE MARCH 22ND, 2022 REGULAR MEETING AND THE EVENTS OF FEBRUARY 11TH, 2018 SPECIAL CALL MEETING, UM, SIGNIFIED BY RAISING YOUR HAND AND SAYING YES.

OH, HI.

AND IF ANYONE ABSTAINING THE NATION AND DOES ANYONE NOT HAVE PROOF? SO WE HAD EIGHT IN FAVOR UM, DOES THAT LEAD, DO I NEED TO FOLLOW ROLE FOR THE COMMISSIONERS WHO ARE ONLINE? OKAY.

SO I'M ACTUALLY RECAP WORK.

AND SO THE COMMISSIONERS WHO ARE ONLINE DEVOTED COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER BE ALERT AND EFFICIENT AND SLOW SAID

[1. Election of Officers for the Building and Standards Commission]

THE SALLY.

THE GETTING OFFICER NEEDS TO BE IN PERSON.

AND SO THE FIRST ITEM ON THE AGENDA BEFORE YOU EVEN BOTHER THE CASES, WE HAVE THE ELECTION OF OFFICERS AND WE'RE REQUIRED TO, AT THIS MEETING YOU ON THE FARM TO ELECTRODE THE CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR WHO WILL SERVE A ONE YEAR TERM BEGINNING, MAY 1ST, 2020 KIDS THAT RUNS THROUGH APRIL 30TH, 2023.

AND IF YOU'D LIKE HER TO REFUSE AT BSE BYLAWS, AUDIT ARTICLES, FOUR AND FIVE REGARDING OFFSPRING DUTIES, CONTINUE, COPY.

YOU HAVE SOME COPIES AND THEY'RE ALSO IN THE READERS AND OH, I WOULD LIKE TO DOMINATE WHAT PEOPLE END UP BEFORE I EVEN DO THAT.

I'M GOING TO SAY THAT I'M VERY PLEASED WITH THE CURRENT MAKEUP OF THE BOARD.

AND I TAKE A DEEP BENCH.

IT'S EXCITING SOME A WHILE.

AND, UM, THE ONLY THING HOLDING US BACK RIGHT NOW IS THE PANDEMIC, BECAUSE WE HAVE SOME IN THE COMMISSIONERS WHO STILL ARE COMING IN PERSON.

AND I HOPE THAT IN THE COMING MONTHS THAT WILL CHANGE.

SO I'M THE NUMBER ONE REQUIREMENT I BELIEVE FOR THE CHAIR RIGHT NOW IS IT DOES NEED TO BE HERE IN PERSON AT THE VICE CHAIR, OBVIOUSLY NEEDS TO BE WILLING AND AVAILABLE WITH THE CHAIRS, NOT ABLE TO PRESIDE OVER A MEETING, BUT IT WOULDN'T HAVE TO BE EVERY MEETING.

AND I BELIEVE THAT YOU WERE NOT, IF YOU HAD TO, UH, AND YOU CAN CORRECT ME LOWERING YOUR PHONE WRONG, I BELIEVE IF YOU HAD TO REPEAT YOURSELF ON AN ITEM, YOU COULD CALL SOMEONE THAT IS PRESENT TO, UH, SEE

[00:10:01]

SO WITHIN RESIDING OFFICER HAD A CAR MISSIONARY OR BEING LISTED IN PERSON.

SO EVEN IF THE VICE-CHAIR WERE ATTENDING VIRTUALLY AND YOU HAD TO RECUSE YOURSELF, UM, OR THE CHAIR HAD TO RECUSE THEMSELVES, UM, THEY COULD TALK, UH, ANOTHER COMMISSIONER THAT'S IN PERSON TO PRESIDE DURING THAT CASE.

AND THAT WOULD BE ACCEPTED.

OKAY, GREAT.

SO I'M KEEPING ALL OF THAT IN MIND.

THE ONLY OTHER THING THAT I'M LOOKING FOR RIGHT NOW, PERSONALLY, IS SOMEONE WHO HAS HAD A BIT OF EXPERIENCE ON THE COMMISSION APP, BUT THAT DIDN'T MIND.

I WOULD LIKE TO ON AN ENGLISH LEARNER FOR A CHAIR, IF SHE IS SO WILLING TO EVEN BE CONSIDERED.

UM, AND FOR VICE CHAIR, I WOULD LIKE TO NOMINATE SESSION LIKEWISE, IF HE IS ALSO GOING TO BE CONSIDERED, BUT THANK YOU FOR THAT NOMINATION.

UH, CAN YOU HEAR ME? THANK YOU MUCH BETTER.

SO YEAH, TO PLAY WITH THE AUDIO, SAY, UH, YES, I WOULD BE HAPPY TO BE CONSIDERED.

I WOULD LIKE JUST, UH, IN THE, UH, INTEREST OF KIND OF FULL DISCLOSURE, THE ARCHITECTURE FIRM OF WHICH I AM ONE OF MULTIPLE OWNERS, UM, WE DO HAVE THE CITY OF AUSTIN IS OUR CLIENT.

THE WORK THAT WE DO HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE WORK OF THIS COMMISSION.

HOWEVER, UM, SO IT'S, UH, UH, AS FAR AS I KNOW, AND I'VE TRIED TO EDUCATE MYSELF ON THIS, UM, THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.

I WANT TO MAKE THAT CLEAR ZERO CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, BUT I DO WANT THE OTHER COMMISSIONERS TO KNOW THAT, UH, IN SOME OTHER DOMAINS, YOU KNOW, I DO WORK WITH THE CITY, MY, AS MY CLIENT IN CASE THAT THAT SHOULD BE SOME SORT OF PERSONAL ISSUE OR YOU, I WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT, BUT AGAIN, IT'S NOT RELATED TO THE WORK THAT WE DO HERE, OR THE TYPES OF PROJECTS THAT WE LOOK AT HERE OR THE, THE, THE, THE CITIZENS THAT COME TO SEE US.

WE WORK ON, UM, LARGER PROJECTS, LIKE THE HOMELESS SHELTER AND AIRPORTS AND CONVENTION CENTERS AND THINGS LIKE THAT.

SO AS MY STATE, OH YEAH, YEAH.

IF THERE IS, IF THERE'S ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO BE CONSIDERED, OR YOU WOULD LIKE TO NOMINATE SOMEONE ELSE THAT'S, WHAT'S GIVEN, AND THERE'S A VOICE NEXT YEAR, ALSO FROM THE CHAIR'S MOTION.

WELL, THANK YOU FOR THE VOTE OF CONFIDENCE.

I THINK TIGHT ENOUGH TO BE EFFICIENT AND TO DO THE JOB, TO STEP IN, UM, ASSUMING THAT NOBODY ELSE, UM, ALSO WANTING TO STEP INTO THAT POSITION.

SO I'M PRETTY SURE I GET SO BORED A YEAR.

THAT'S GOOD TO HEAR.

THAT'S A GOOD, AND I LOOK FORWARD TO SUPPORTING YOU AND HELPING YOU IN EVERY WAY THAT I CAN.

EXCELLENT.

WELL, I'LL CALL THE QUESTION ALL IN FAVOR OF ELECTING COMMISSIONER.

THE CHAIR AND COMMISSIONER FOR VERA.

YES, SIR.

VICE CHAIR NEXT YEAR.

I'LL JUST SAY AYE, AND WAVE YOUR HAND AND I'LL CALL IT BROKE OFF.

AND ONLINE, WE HAVE COMMISSIONER POPPY LAW.

ARE YOU IN FAVOR? ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF THE 10? I CAN BUY IT, BUT YEAH.

ITEM NUMBER TWO ON THE AGENDA IS SEAL 20 22 0 4 9 7 8 2.

COMMISSIONER MAILER.

ARE YOU A BETTER? YES.

AND I'D ALSO LIKE TO SAY THANK YOU TO YOU AND VICE-CHAIR ABILA FOR DOING SUCH A GREAT JOB THIS PAST YEAR.

[2. Case Number: CL 2022-049782 Property address: 1167 Springdale Road / Owner: Willie Rean Carter Staff presenter: Alicia Tovar Previous Commission Action: Continued from February 24, 2021 Staff recommendation: Repair residential structure]

AND REGARDING THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1, 1 6 7 SPRINGDALE ROAD, THIS IS A RETURNING CASE THAT WAS FIRST HEARD IN FEBRUARY OF 2021.

STAFF EXHIBITS CAN BE FOUND IN THE GREEN BOOK AND THE PEOPLE BROUGHT OVER AND READERS.

HERE'S SOME FACTS ABOUT THE CASE.

THIS CASE IS ABOUT AN UNOCCUPIED BOARDED, SINGLE FAMILY, RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE.

THE HOME HAS NO

[00:15:01]

HOT WATER, NO ELECTRICITY MAKING IT UNFIT FOR HUMAN OCCUPANCY.

THE CASE IS A PROPER, APPROXIMATELY EIGHT YEARS OLD WITH NO PERMITS OBTAIN AND NO REPAIRS TO PAY TODAY.

SAFE CONDITIONS ARE CONSIDERED SUBSTANDARD AND REQUIRE REPAIR OR DEMOLITION PREVIOUSLY HEARD IN FEBRUARY, 2021.

THE CASE WAS CONTINUED ONE MONTH TO ALLOW THE UNDERSTORY TO RETURN WITH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR MAKING THE REPAIRS.

THE OWNER PASSED AWAY IN THE END ROOM.

AND THE CASE WAS PULLED FROM THE MARCH, 2021 AGENDA.

SINCE THAT TIME FIELD STAFF HAS RESEARCHED THE PROPERTY, SEND OUT NOTICES TO ALL NOMINATORS AND IS BRINGING FACE BACK TONIGHT WITH A REQUEST FOR DEMOLITION.

WE'RE GOING TO, UM, I'M SORRY.

IN YOUR GOOGLE DRIVE FOLDERS, YOU WILL FIND THE FOLLOWING EXHIBIT ONE AND TWO, WHICH WERE PREVIOUSLY ADMITTED, EXHIBIT THREE, WHICH CONTAINS AN UPDATED COMPLAINT AND CASE HISTORY.

THE COPY OF THE TRAVIS CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT RECORDS THAT VERIFIES OWNERSHIP REGARDLESS IS A VIOLATION NOTICES OF HEARING AND POSTINGS AND EXHIBIT TWO, WHICH CONSISTS OF QUINN'S PHOTOGRAPHS MARKED EXHIBIT FOUR, WHICH CONSISTS OF CODES, PHOTOGRAPHS MARKED AS EXHIBITS FOUR, A THROUGH FOUR H AND LASTLY CODES RECOMMENDED QUARTER AUSTIN CODE INVESTIGATOR ELISIA TOVAR IS HERE TONIGHT TO PRESENT THE PHOTOS.

IN THIS CASE, MARK FITZ EXHIBITS FOUR, APRIL FOUR H, AND DISCUSS THE VIOLATIONS AS DEPICTED INVESTIGATOR TOVAR.

IF YOU COULD SIT AT THE TABLE RIGHT OVER THERE AND YOU BEGIN YOUR TESTIMONY AND THIS LAURA JACKSON CROCKET HERE AS WELL.

ON DECEMBER 6TH, 2018, A FOLLOW-UP INSPECTION WAS CONDUCTED.

X I, WHEN SHE FINISHES, I GUESS SHOULDN'T REALLY SYSTEM, RIGHT? SO THAT'S WHERE IT FALL LEFT.

UNITED'S AS WELL.

THAT'S ALL.

OH, SHE'S GOING TO DO THAT'S IT COVER? SURE.

THE CITY OF AUSTIN CALLED INVESTIGATOR FOR THE NORTH CENTRAL DIVISION, THE CASE AND PRESENTED THIS EVENING FOR LUCY 1167 SPRINGDALE LOAD ON MARCH, EXCUSE ME, MARCH 3RD, 2014.

THE CASE FOR US IN CODE FOR THE TAPE AUSTIN CODES, ATTENTION FOR THE COMPLAINT OF NEGATIVITIES AND OCCUPIED RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE ON MARCH 28TH, 2014, INITIAL INSPECTION WAS PERFORMED BY OUR FORMER ACD INFECTED.

THE TIME THEY NOTED THE STRUCTURE HAD TWO BROKEN WINDOWS WITH PLASTIC BAGS PLACED OVER THE BROKEN WINDOWS WINDOW PAINTS ON MARCH 31ST, 2014.

SPECTER STAFF MADE CONTACT WITH THE TEEKAT HOMEOWNERS SON WHO STATED HE NOR HIS MOTHER ARE CURRENTLY OCCUPIED.

I COULD NOT AFFORD TO PAY FOR YOU TWO DAYS.

FURTHERMORE, THE GAS METER HAD BEEN REMOVED FOR SEVERAL YEARS.

AC ACD STACK REFERRED THEM TO THE ACD OUTREACH PROGRAM AND PROGRAM SPECIALIST, ALANA REAPER FOR THE ASSISTANCE ON OCTOBER 2ND, 2014, THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION WAS SENT CERTIFIED MAIL TO THE CHARLES KIND OF PRESENTATION, PROPERTY OWNERS, WILLOW W WILLIE BRIANNE CARTER AND STEVEN HAD DONE SUBSEQUENT INSPECTIONS FROM 2014 TO 2016, SHOWED THAT THE PROPERTY REMAINED IN VALIDATION WITH NO UTILITIES AND EXTERIOR SIDING CABBAGES.

THE CASE WAS TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER INSPECTOR ON A SECOND NOTICE OF VIOLATION.

SO THAT ACTUALLY MAILED UP BECAUSE THE PREVIOUS ONE HAD EXPIRED ON MARCH 2ND, 2017, A CITATION WAS ISSUED FOR EXTERIOR STRUCTURE, NOT MAINTAINED ON DECEMBER 6TH, 2017.

THE PA'S CASE ABC CASE FILE WAS CREATED AND SUBMITTED FOR BBC CONSIDERATION.

THE PROPERTY REMAINED IN VIOLATION.

UH, JANUARY 2ND, 2018.

I NOTICED IF I LET YOU KNOW METADATA INSTITUTE PARTY, WILLIE RYANNE PARKER WHO RESIDES AT 33, 11 HOLLYWOOD

[00:20:01]

ON FEBRUARY 24 TO 2021, THE CASE WAS BROUGHT BEFORE PSE COMMISSION.

THE CASE WAS CONTINUED UNTIL MARCH FOLLOWING ALLOWING THE ACD OWNER'S DAUGHTER TO RETURN WITH THE FINANCIAL PLAN FOR DEMOLITION OR REPAIRS FADES FROM PROSPECTIVE CONTRACTORS ON MARCH 17TH, 2041, ACD HAD TO PERFORM AN EDS THAT'S EMERGENCY BOARD SECURE BECAUSE REAR DOOR HAD BEEN KICKED IN AND DAMAGED ON APRIL, 2022.

THE CASE IS TRANSFERRED TO ME FOR PIECES PSE PRESENTATION, UM, APRIL 7TH, 2022, FOLLOW UP INSPECTION.

I'M SORRY.

FOLLOWING THE SPECIAL WAS PERFORMED TO UPDATE THE PHOTOS FOR THE PREVIOUS HEARING SINGLE-STORY WOOD-FRAME STRUCTURE.

I'M POSTING BRIM, AN OCCUPIED SECURE, AND AS I'M OCCUPIED AND SECURE FROM AN ALTERNATE CENTURY, THEN IT MISSING FRONT PORCH.

WHAT YOUR VERTICAL POSTS IS CAUSING THE FRONT PORCH TO LEAN AND LIST DOWNWARD.

THE FRONT PORCH ROOF HAS EXCESSIVE DECKING DAMAGE AND MISSING ROOF SHINGLES, AS WELL AS THE DAMAGE AND MISINFORMATION BOARD, THE ENTIRE STRUCTURE, IT LACKS INTERIOR, THE ENTIRE STRUCTURE, EXTERIOR WALLS, LACK PROTECTIVE COATING AS WELL AS DAMAGE AND MISSING WOODSIDE.

THERE'S DAMAGE TO THE CONCRETE SKIRTING ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE TO NOT EVER PRESENT PHOTOGRAPHS, EXHIBIT FOUR, EIGHT THROUGH FOUR H THESE PHOTOGRAPHS ARE TRUE AND ACCURATE DEPICTION OF THE VIOLATIONS AND CONDITIONS AT TIME.

AND THE DATES THE PHOTOS WERE TAKEN FOR PHOTOGRAPH FOUR, EIGHT CONSECUTIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF THE SINGLE STORY, WHAT FRAMERS AND JUST STRUCTURE ON POSTAL GAME AUTOGRAPH TO BE IS A PHOTOGRAPH OF THE LEFT BROCKPORT AND THE LEFT FRONT PORCH.

YOU CAN SEE THE PORCH IS MISSING THE VERTICAL POST PHOTOGRAPH TO SEE.

YOU CAN SEE THE FRONT PORCHES IS LEANING DOWNWARDS.

I'M SORRY, IT'S A CLOSE UP OF THE CONCRETE PORCH.

AND YOU CAN SEE THE FOOTING IS CRACKED AND BROKEN AND ARE LABELED TO SUSTAIN THE SUPPORT OF THE VERTICAL POSTS AS WELL.

AS YOU CAN SEE, THE PORCH IS CRACKING PHOTOGRAPH TO EAT.

IT'S A SHOT OF THE LEFT SIDE.

YOU CAN SEE THE EXTERIOR EXTERIOR PROTECTIVE CODING.

IT'S DETERIORATING ALONG THE ELEMENTS OF NATURE FOR THE EXTERIOR SIDING.

PHOTOGRAPH TWO F TWO F IS A CLOSE-UP SHOT OF THE LEFT SIDE.

FOUNDATIONAL SKIRT.

AS YOU CAN SEE, THE DAMAGE IS THE DAMAGE IS BELOW THE WATER CLEANUP BELT.

AND THE MISSING SKIRTING IS ALLOWING THE ELEMENTS OF NATURE TO ENTER TO THE EXPOSED POST AS WELL AS CLOSE SEPARATING, AS WELL AS A 12 STEP OF THE SEPARATING EXTERIOR TONGUE AND GROOVE WALL PACKS AND MISSING EXTERIOR PROTECTIVE COATING, AND PHOTOGRAPH TWO G THIS SHOT OF THE REAR STRUCTURE.

YOU CAN SEE THE KNOWER WALL.

IF SIDING IS DETERIORATED AND SEPARATING FROM THE FRAME, PHOTOGRAPH TWO H IN THE SHOT, THERE ARE TWO NEWLY PLACED BY WHAT, UH, HOW WOULD YOU USE TO COVER THE WINDOWS WAVERING ROOF DECKING? THANK YOU.

THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION BECAUSE OF THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN IN THESE PHOTOGRAPHS.

AND THOSE DESCRIBED AN ARTIFACT.

THE CODE OFFICIAL FOUND THAT THIS STRUCTURE IS A PUBLIC AND PRACTICALLY SUBSCALE AND UNSAFE CONDITIONS.

STAFF ASKED THE COMMISSION TO ADMIT EXHIBIT THREE, WHICH INCLUDES STAFF PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT, AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND OTHER RELEVANT DOCUMENTS AND PHOTOGRAPHS, PHOTOGRAPHS MARKED AS EXHIBITS FOUR, EIGHT THROUGH FOUR H STAFF ALSO REQUEST PERMISSION, ADOPT THE PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT EXPLOSIONS OF LAW ORDER.

THE FOLLOWING REQUIRE THE OWNER COMPLETE THE THEM WITHIN 45 DAYS FROM THE DATE, THE ORDER HAS MAILED A OBTAIN AND FINALIZE ALL NECESSARY PERMIT PERMITS.

THEY DEMOLISHED ALL FOUR FINS AND THE RESIDENTS ALIGN ACCESSORY STRUCTURES AND REMOVES DEBRIS LEAVING THE LOT CLEANING RIGHT AND REQUEST INSPECTIONS FOR AUSTRIAN.

GO TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE ON THE 46 DAYS, COMPLIANCE HAS NOT BEEN ACHIEVED, AUTHORIZED THE CODE OFFICIAL PROCEED WITH DEMOLITION AND AUTHOR CONSIDER ALL PORTIONS OF THE RESIDENTIAL AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, INCLUDING ANY ITEMS IN AND AROUND THE STRUCTURES AS DEBRIS AND DISPOSE OF AS SUCH THE PROPERTY OWNERS WILL BE ON NOTICE.

THE OFFICIAL WAS AUTHORIZED TO ACCESS ALL EXPENSES IN HER PROPERTY UNLESS EXEMPTED BY THE TEXAS CONSTITUTION.

ELAINE, FOR THOSE EXPENSES MAY BE FILED BY THE CITY OF BOSTON AND REPORTED WITH THE TRAVIS COUNTY DEEP RECORDS, INTER SHELL ACCRUE AT A RATE OF 10% PER YEAR FROM THE DATE OF THE ASSESSMENT UNTIL I CAN FOLD.

BUT IT WAS ACTUALLY FOUR, EIGHT TO FOUR H.

SO TO CLARIFY, SPECTRA TOVAR, YOU WERE STATING, UM, FOR THE IMAGES WE WERE FUMING 2 8 2 2 8,

[00:25:01]

IS THAT CORRECT? THAT'S CORRECT.

I WILL GO AHEAD AND ADMIT EXHIBITS THREE AND FOUR EIGHT THROUGH 14 STUDENT IS JACQUELINE COCKPIT.

IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO COME DOWN HERE AND TELL US WHAT'S GOING ON.

UM, I'M NOT QUITE SURE WHAT YOU WANT TO KNOW FIRST, BUT YES, MY, UM, I WAS ON THE LAST ONE AND MY MOTHER PROCESS PASSED AWAY THE FOLLOWING MONTH.

SO, UM, PRETTY MUCH IT KINDA GOT OUT OF SIGHT OUT OF MIND, BUT MY SON HAS DECIDED TO STEP IN AND HELP ME OUT BECAUSE HE WOULDN'T LIKE JUST KIND OF MAKE A LONG STORY SHORT.

WE DON'T WANT TO SELL THE PROPERTY.

THAT'S THE THING WE MIGHT GONNA STAY OFF.

SO MY BROTHER HAS, UM, AT A RATE THAT WE'RE NOT GOING TO SELL.

SO WE'RE GOING TO TRY TO PICK AND GO AHEAD AND FIX IT UP, UH, IN THE MEANTIME, THANKS MELANIE FOR ANSWERING MY EMAILS AND STUFF LIKE THAT.

SO I'M TRYING TO WORK ON IT.

WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND TRY TO GET ALONG TO TRY TO FIX THE HOUSE UP.

UM, AND THE PROCESS, UH, NOVEMBER.

UM, I HAD TO GO AHEAD AND DO A GUARDIANSHIP FOR MY SISTER WHO IS DISABLED.

UM, IT WAS NEAR P TWO THAT I DON'T WANT TO SAY MY SISTERS.

UM, THAT'S HER SON, SEBASTIAN, AND WE ALL WANT TO GET TOGETHER TO GO AHEAD.

I DIDN'T GET THE GUARDIANSHIP DONE IN NOVEMBER, SO THAT'S BEHIND ME NOW I CAN MOVE WATER.

BUT WHEN I SAW THE NOTICES, I WAS LIKE, OH GOD, I DO NEED TO KIND OF HURRY UP AND GET BACK ON.

SO AGAIN, WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND TRY TO GO ALONG AND GET TO THE HOSPITAL.

SO MY BIOLOGICAL SON CAN KIND OF MOVE UP THERE, HAVE PAY TAXES AND STUFF, BUT THE TEXAS PARENTS.

SO, UH, YOU GUYS KINDA JUST GIVE ME A LITTLE BIT MORE TIME SINCE MY MOTHER DID PASS AWAY, WE TRY TO KINDA GET THEM ALONE.

CAUSE IT'S GOING TO COST, AS YOU CAN TELL.

AND I TRY TO KEEP UP WITH THE GRASS THAT'S BEEN HAS, UM, THAT KIND OF HIRED SOMEBODY THAT HE STARTS WITH THE GO UP, THE THE GOOD, I TEND TO DO THE CUT AND TRY TO KEEP IT CUTTING ME OUT.

UH, AND SO, UM, IN HIS NAME TO SEE HIM YELL, SO HE HAS AGREED TO HELP US OUT TO KEEP THE GRASS CUT.

SO THAT WHAT WE'RE ABOUT NOW IS THE THING IS, IS TRYING TO GIVE OUT SPOOKS STUFF.

SO SOMEONE CAN GROUP HAVING HIS MOM, SO THEY KEEP THE PRODUCT.

AND SO I'M GOING TO TRY TO, UM, AND TRY TO PAY THAT MONTHLY OR WHATEVER THE CASE MAY BE.

AND I KNOW, I KNOW ONE OF THE CONCERNS, AT LEAST SEVERAL YEARS BACK WAS PEOPLE PERHAPS INHABITING THE HOUSE.

WELL, NOT NECESSARILY BREAKING IN, UM, MY SISTER, UM, SHE WAS ACTUALLY STANDING ALONG WITH HER SON WHO IS HERE TODAY AND NOW THEY'RE, UH, SINCE MY STEPFATHER HAS PASSED AWAY, MY MOTHER HAS PASSED AWAY.

AND THEN AGAIN, SHE ENDED UP HAVING A STROKE.

SHEILA HAS HAD A STROKE AND SO ON NOW I'M HER CAREGIVER THROUGH MEALS ON WHEELS.

SO, UM, I HAD MOVED HER FROM THAT PROPERTY.

SO NOBODY'S THERE AND I MOVED HER TO HER BIOLOGICAL FATHER WHO STAYS ON 33, 11 HOLLYWOOD.

AND ALONG WITH MY NEPHEW, HE'S HELPED ME OUT WITH HIS MOTHER.

AND SO, UM, NOBODY'S THERE NOW.

WE'VE BEEN THINKING SOMEBODY IS TRYING TO EITHER FALL IN THE WINDOW.

SO MY HUSBAND IS, THAT'S WHY YOU'RE RIGHT.

WE NEED TO HURRY UP AND TRY TO GET HIM FIXED UP.

BUT WE'VE TRIED TO, UM, THIS SIDE, BUT IT LOOKED LIKE THEY DONE BROKE THE WINDOWS ON THIS SIDE.

AND I WAS LIKE, OKAY, WE CAN'T, WE HAVE A GOOD SENSE OF, YES, WE DO NEED TO GO GET IT DONE.

AND THAT WAS MY NEXT QUESTION.

NOW WE'VE BEEN TRYING AND WE WERE THERE.

WE THOUGHT THEY WERE GOING IN ON THE RIGHT SIDE.

WE'VE DONE WHAT WE GOT WAS GOOD.

BUT THEN WE NOTICED THIS LEFT SIDE AND THEN WE HAVE NEIGHBORS ON THIS SIDE.

UM, WE THOUGHT WAS PRETTY GOOD AND WATCHING THAT, BUT OBVIOUSLY NOT IN THE APARTMENTS TO THE RIGHT SIDE.

SO I'LL THINK THERE'S GOING IN OVER THERE TOO MUCH ANYMORE.

LOOKED LIKE THEY WERE GOING TO HAVE THE BOARD UP THAT BAD.

I MEAN, I'VE BEEN IN A TALK WITH AUSTIN TELCO TO SEE IF IT'S FUCKING PILOT DO INVESTMENT.

UM,

[00:30:01]

UM, IT DOES FIND I'LL OPEN IT UP TO THE COMMISSION FOR QUESTIONS, IF YES, COMMISSIONER, UM, HOW LONG DO YOU THINK THE PROCESS THAT YOU ARE? WELL, I ACTUALLY HAVE AMAZING EXTERIOR AT MY HOUSE BETWEEN WINDOWS AND DOORS AND THE GUY THERE.

HE SAID JUST TO KIND OF, ALTHOUGH, UM, WITH ME WORKING WITH MEALS ON WHEELS, I HAVE PUT IN THE APPLICATION, I HAVE TO PUT IN AN APPLICATION, UM, TO SEE IF WE CAN GET A LITTLE HAIR THAT WAY TOO.

NOW THAT I'M WORKING WITH MORE OF THEM, WE HAVE, THEY, THEY HAVE, UH, STAND UP AND PUT IN AN APPLICATION THAT YOU SEE THEY CAN, HOW MUCH DO YOU PUT YOUR, HOW MUCH AND GET THEY CAME.

BUT I DID THAT AND ALSO THE AREA URBAN, UM, I DIDN'T GET A CHANCE TO STAY IN THE PIT.

SO, UM, I'M GONNA TRY TO GET THAT DONE HERE ASAP, BUT BETWEEN, UM, MEALS ON WHEELS, , I'M GONNA TRY TO SEE HOW MUCH THEY CAN HAVE WE GOING TO HAVE TO GET SUCH A HUGE LOAN TO GET IT, ET CETERA.

BUT, UM, I'M HOPING WE CAN DO THIS IN A COUPLE OF MONTHS OR SO, AND MEMPHIS, YOUR HOW LONG, AMAZING EXTERIORS SO WAS BUILT.

IT'S FREE THROUGH GOES ON.

WE HAVE, I'M NOT SURE WHO, WHAT PEOPLE THEY WORK WITH TO THE CHILD AND YOU KNOW, HOW LONG THEY SELL.

UH, ONCE I CAN KIND OF GET THE WORD FROM , I CAN KIND OF GIVE YOU ONE OF THE BIG SHOTS WITH MEALS ON WHEELS WAS PART OF THIS ORGANIZATION RIGHT HERE AT THIS DESK, MANY CARES.

WELL, IT WAS ONE OF THE PILOTS FAKE ELABORATE MAN TESTING.

VERY NICE GENTLEMEN.

I WISH I COULD REMEMBER HIS NAME.

THIS WAS THAT SAD.

AND THEN I WAS GOING TO SAY, I DON'T KNOW, I'VE BEEN WORKING WITH ERIN AND SHE'S BEEN KIND OF PEOPLE BEING LONG HAS GONE TO BEING THE IT'S A, YOU KNOW, A COUPLE OF MONTHS OR SO, BUT I'M LIKE, I DON'T HAVE IT WELL, BUT WELL, CAN'T YOU PUT, UH, IF YOU WERE TO COME BACK HERE AND GIVE US A REWARD, YOU HAVE A, UH, AN AMOUNT OF TIME THAT YOU THINK YOU COULD MAKE PROGRESS.

SO YOU CAN SAY, HEY, THIS IS WHAT IT IS.

I HAVE DOCUMENTS SHOWING IT.

AND SO ON.

HOW LONG WOULD THAT, WHAT WOULD BE YOUR PROJECTION? UM, CAN WE SAY, IF YOU CAN GIVE ME THESE SIX, UH, OKAY.

WE CAN HELP YOU WITH THINGS SO WE CAN, WE CAN, IF THE COMMISSION DECIDES TO EXTEND THE TIMEFRAME, THE TIMELINE THAT'S RECOMMENDED RIGHT NOW IS 45 DAYS TO COMPLETE ALL REPAIR.

BUT IF THE COMMISSION DECIDES IN OUR ORDER TO THE EXTEND THAT WE CAN GO TO ID DATES WITHOUT REQUIRING ANY FURTHER DOCUMENTATION.

I DON'T MEAN TO CUT YOU OUT BECAUSE IF THEY SAY COUPLE OF MONTHS, 60 DAYS, SO CAN LEASE, YOU KNOW, 60 DAYS TO, TO BRING SOME THINGS I'M HOPING THEY ARE SO THEY CAN SAY YES, THEY GOING TO GO THERE.

SO AS A, AS A COMMISSION, WE'RE SOMEWHAT LIMITED IN THAT WE CANNOT GO BEYOND 90 DAYS WITHOUT, WITHOUT THE CERTAIN DOCUMENTATION.

UM, HOWEVER, I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO REMIND THE COMMISSION THAT, BECAUSE THIS IS A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, UM, IF THE REPAIRS ARE MADE, IF WE DO HAVE AN ORDER AND LET'S SAY FINES DO START TO ACCRUE AFTER 90 DAYS, ANY REPAIRS THAT ARE MADE ON THAT RESIDENCE CAN OFFSET ANY FUNDS.

SO IF THE FINES ADD UP TO A THOUSAND DOLLARS AND TRULY NEW GROUNDS FOR THE PATTERN, THAT WILL JUST OPPOSITE.

THAT'S FINE.

THAT'S SOMETHING THAT COULD BE DONE.

ADMINISTRATIVE.

SO JUST DRINK THE KUNSHAN IT LOOKS, UM, OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE PROPERTY REPRESENTATIVE.

ON THIS SPECTRUM BREAK THE CORD, IT LOOKS LIKE THERE MIGHT BE ADDITIONAL LIMITATIONS MAYBE WITH THE FOUNDATION OR AT LEAST IN THE FRONT, ON THE PORCH.

I HAVE A QUESTIONS.

SO I HEAR YOU TALKING ABOUT THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING OF THE STRUCTURE, BUT BASED

[00:35:01]

SO HAVE YOU HAD ANYBODY AT ALL GO BY THERE TO LOOK, TO SEE WHAT THE PLAN WOULD BE? THE LITTLE GIRL? YES.

UH, YES.

UM, WE, THE COURT ITSELF, YOU MAY, WE MAY HAVE TO REDO THE WATCH PERIOD, UH, THAT MAY NOT BE FIXABLE AND THAT'S GONNA BE, IT'S GONNA BE THE MOST.

UM, SO THAT'S GOING TO BE THE MOST, WE MAY HAVE TO KIND OF CUT PORCH ALL PERIOD AND GO FROM THERE.

SO WE'RE SEEING, AND ONE OF THE PICTURES ALSO SHOWED A RACK AND SOMETHING THAT LOOKED LIKE THE FOUNDATION.

DID YOU NOTICE THAT THE EXHIBITS AS WELL? SO I THINK OUR CONCERN HERE TODAY IS TO MAKE SURE CONSENT ORDER THAT THE, UH, INSPECTORS ARE ASKING FOR IS FOR DEMO POSITION.

AND YOU WANT TO SAY THAT THE PROPERTY, UM, REALLY TRYING TO SAY THE HOUSE, RIGHT.

AND THAT'S WHY I SAID, UM, I'M GOING TO HAVE TO GET ALONG AFTER THE FREE WORK.

SO THAT'S WHAT I WAS THINKING.

I'M TRYING TO SEE WHAT I CAN DO FOR US, THAT WE OUT PROFITS.

UM, AND SO ONCE THAT IS THAT, THAT'S WHAT THAT LONG IS GOING TO COME IN SO I CAN FINISH PAYING EVERYBODY.

SO, ALL RIGHT.

I'M TRYING TO, TRYING TO SAVE THE HOUSE, BUT THE PORT IS, IS THE BIGGER ISSUE.

BUT, UM, LISTEN, BECAUSE LIKE YOU SAID, THE FOUNDATION THAT'S GOING TO HAVE TO BE FIXED, BUT PROBABLY BEFORE YOU DO THE WINDOWS, CAUSE YOU DON'T WANT TO.

SO, OKAY.

WELL I THINK WHAT WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE VOICE, WHATEVER HAPPENS, DECIDE IS, YOU KNOW, THE POOL WATCH.

SO YOU'LL LET US KNOW WHO'S WORKING ON IT AND WHAT EXACTLY SPEED.

AND THAT'S MORE OF A SPECIFIC PLAN THAT WILL HELP US TO MAKE ANY FURTHER DECISIONS.

BUT I DON'T KNOW WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN JUST YET.

CONTRACT AROUND THE PROPERTY, THE CONTRACTOR, SO THEY COULD BRING IT TO COMPLIANCE THIS DAY.

AND THERE'S THEN YOU, YOU KNOW, PEOPLE, THEY SAY THEY KEEP THOSE.

THE THING IS THEY'LL THEY GAVE YOU THE IDEA OF WHAT THAT WOULD COST.

PROBABLY A LOT GOING ON HERE AT LEAST 50,000.

COMMISSIONER THOMPSON.

UH, DO YOU KNOW A GENTLEMAN BY THE NAME OF CHARLES CLOUD CLO EMT, M A N AT MEALS ON WHEELS.

IF YOU WOULD, UH, BORROW A PAN OR SOMETHING, TAKE IT STAYED.

SO I WOULD LOOK HIM UP TOMORROW, NO CLOUD CLO, T M A N.

IT MIGHT STILL BE WORKING ON THE PHRASE OF WHAT 21 THEY WOULD.

THAT WAS A BIG JOB FOR HIM, BUT ALL SERIOUS, UH, PROBABLY HAS IN THE LOOP.

UM, CAUSE I'VE BEEN WORKING WITH YOU AND I DON'T KNOW WHAT ALL THE RULES ARE THAT THEY HAVE, BUT, UH, I KNOW SO MANY PEOPLE I LIVE ON THE EAST SIDE, SO I KNOW A LOT OF PEOPLE THAT HE HAS YELLED AT.

IT'S ALWAYS BEEN SIMILAR.

THE 91ST STATE, IT'D BE OFFSET THAT BY ANY COSTS THAT ARE ACTUALLY PAID TO REPAIR THE STRUCTURE.

SO OTHER QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION THAT'S GREAT.

WELL, UM, THE OPTIONS THAT WE HAVE AS A COMMISSION, CHRIS, WE DO NOTHING.

WE COULD CONTINUE THE CASE.

WE COULD GO AHEAD AND REVISE THE ORDER TO MAKE REPAIRS WITHIN 90 DAYS.

AND AS PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED, ANY FINES THAT WOULD BEGIN TO OCCUR AFTER

[00:40:01]

UH, WE COULD CAN'T REALLY GO BEYOND 90 DAYS BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE THE EVIDENCE IN FRONT OF US THAT EVEN GOING TO 90 DAYS, WE COULD ALSO REQUEST THAT WITH SOME MORE INFORMATION.

UM, YOU DON'T HAVE TO REQUEST IT, JUST MAKE THE ORDER AND YOU COULD BE AND WISH YOU THE BEST OF LUCK.

UM, BUT YES, SO ENTERTAINING LOTIONS, I WOULD LIKE TO TAKE ONE OR DISCUSS FURTHER SO WE CAN SEE FOR 90 DAYS JUST THINKING OF THAT SINCE IT'S LIKE THE STOVER THAT'S.

SO IT SOUNDS LIKE THERE'S SOME PROGRESS BEING IN DIRECTION AND IT DIDN'T, IT TOOK THE CLIENTS BACKWARDS HERE TO HOPEFULLY GET HER TO THAT.

BUT THEN WITH THE 90 DAYS, BUT I'M THINKING WE WANT A SIX SIGNIFICANT DIRECTION THAT CONTRACTOR ESTIMATES.

SO A LITTLE BIT DARK UNDER WAY.

I'M JUST FREE UP HERE AND I'LL GO SAY THE AIR.

I DIDN'T KNOW ANYTHING UNTIL THE FIRST HEARING.

SO I'M NOT, I DIDN'T KNOW THIS WAS GOING ON UNTIL THE FIRST YEAR.

I THINK MY MOM, SHE FINALLY DECIDED, YOU KNOW, ELDERLY PEOPLE.

THEY TRY TO KEEP IT UP IN THE RATS.

AND SINCE I DON'T WANT THAT KIND OF TAKES CARE OF THE FAMILY THINKS SHE KIND OF SCARED, BUT THAT'S OKAY.

YOU KNOW, THEY'RE ABOUT TO TRY TO GET MY, TAKE MY LIFE, BUT I'M TRYING TO GET MY BROTHER.

HE WANTS TO KEEP THEIR PROPERTY IN MICHIGAN.

AND I SAID, OKAY, WELL, WHAT DO YOU WANT ME TO DO? MY SON, HE BREAK HIM FROM POLICE.

BRING HIM HOME.

IT'S GOING TO BE YOUR PROBLEM.

YOU GOT GET IT TOGETHER.

SO, SO WOULD WE CONTINUE THE CASE? BUT THAT WOULD BE THE PROPER PHRASE.

SO THAT, THAT IS AN OPTION TO CONTINUE THE CASE.

IN WHICH CASE IT'S JACKSON CROCKETT WOULD NEED TO BRING IT BACK.

WE NEED TO BE VERY CLEAR ON THE THINGS THAT WE LOOKING FORWARD TO.

AGAIN, AN OPTION IS TO JUST HAVE A DOOR REVISE THIS ORDER TO PUSH IT OUT TO THE BACKSTORY 90 DAYS.

IS TOO MUCH, WE'RE JUST GOING TO DEMOLISH IT.

WE COULD, YOU KNOW, PLAY WITH THE FINE AMOUNT.

IN FACT, THERE ARE NO FINES AT THE MOMENT.

UM, BUT IT CAN BE VERY MUCH, WELL, YES, EVERYBODY OPTIONS THE POST OPENING UP.

SORRY, I'M GOING TO HERE.

I THINK THE CHALLENGING THING FOR ME, THIS IS WHAT THIS SESSION IS THAT THE REQUEST IS FOR DEMO AND THEY OWN THIS REQUEST IS FOR A RENOVATION.

SO YOU HAVE TO KEEP, IT WOULD MODIFY THIS PARTICULAR, WHAT ARE, WHAT ADVICE, AND IT BECOMES REALLY LIMITLESS IS THAT IT WOULD STILL BE AN ORDER, EXCUSE ME.

BUT DEFINITELY, UM, AFTER THE TIME PERIOD IS EXPIRED.

SO SOME, A LITTLE BIT TYPICAL WITHOUT HAVING THE PLANTS OR THE SPECIFIC PLANTS PROBLEMS WITHOUT CONTRACTING AND THE REASON WHICH MY ANOTHER THING IS THE REASON WE'RE TRYING NOT TO PARE DOWN THE PROPERTY IN THAT HOUSE, BECAUSE IT WAS A HOUSE IN FRONT OF IT.

IT WAS, MY GRANDPA WAS MY MOTHER'S PAWS.

SO IT WAS LIKE A, UM, ELECTRICIAN.

THEY, MY GRANDFATHER WAS AN ELECTRICIAN AND I THINK THAT WAS HIS OFFICE TYPE OF THING.

AND SO I THINK THAT'S WHEN MY BROTHER DIDN'T TRY TO HOLD ON TO THE SENTIMENTAL STUFF.

I MEAN, IT MAY NOT BE, WE MAY HAVE IN CANADA, NO BIG DEAL.

BUT, UM, THE PERSON I TALKED TO, BUT IT MADE THE EXTERIOR EXPERIENCE, A NEW ONE, THEY'RE SAYING IT'S FIXED.

SO I'M MUST GO AT THEIR WORD AND WE'RE GOING TO TRY TO GET GOOD WHERE TO REVISE IT TO IN ORDER TO MAKE REPAIRS.

AND THAT IF YOU GET INTO THIS AND DISCOVERED, NO, THIS

[00:45:01]

THAT WOULD SATISFY ME MORE IF IT ESTABLISHED, JUST SO YOU KNOW, IT'S NOT LIKE IT'S AND I'M SORRY, I CUT YOU OFF.

THAT HELPS IN A WAY.

SO YOU DON'T HAVE TO SPEAK IN EXHIBIT THREE, CITIZEN DEMOLISHED, THE NEWEST ONES, MR. HERRERA, DID YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY, WELL, YES, BUT THEN YOU, YOU KIND OF FOUND A VERY ELEGANT WORK AROUND, BUT I WAS GOING TO SAY THAT, UM, YOU KNOW, I'D BE IN FAVOR OF PROVIDING, YOU KNOW, SOME SORT OF EXTENSION TO GIVE THE HOMEOWNER AN OPPORTUNITY TO SEE IF THEY CAN SECURE THESE LOANS.

IT SEEMS LIKE THEY CLEARLY HAVE AN INTEREST IN SAVING THIS PROPERTY AND, AND A LOT OF PASSION FOR IT.

BUT OF COURSE THERE'S SEVERAL THINGS THAT NEED TO HAPPEN, WHICH WE HAVE TO WAIT AND SEE IF THEY DO RIGHT.

DO THEY GET THE LOAN? UM, AND THEY SECURE A GENERAL CONTRACTOR WHO CAN DO THIS IN A TIMELY FASHION.

UH, AND AS HAS BEEN MENTIONED BY OTHERS, ONCE EITHER AID OR THINGS MAY NOT HAPPEN DESPITE BEST INTENTIONS OR B, ONCE THE HOMEOWNER GETS DEEPER INTO THIS PROJECT, THEY MAY FIND THAT IT'S MORE THAN THEY, THEY WANT TO TAKE ON, UM, IN EITHER OF THOSE SCENARIOS THEN, UM, YOU KNOW, I GUESS WE WOULD REVERT TO A DEMOLITION.

SO ORIGINALLY I WAS GOING TO SAY, I WOULD BE IN FAVOR OF GIVING THEM, YOU KNOW, SOMETIMES 60 DAYS, WHATEVER TO SEE IF THEY CAN MOVE FORWARD ON THIS ARE THEIR INTENTIONS.

AND IF NOT, THEN COME BACK AND, AND THE ORIGINAL STAFF RECOMMENDATION WOULD THEN, YOU KNOW, THEN I, I, I WOULD VOTE OR IMPLEMENTING THAT.

BUT I THINK YOU SAID THAT WE CAN MODIFY THIS ORDER TO BE REPAIR THE ITEMS THAT ARE NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE.

AND THEN IF THE HOMEOWNER DECIDES THEY WANT TO DEMOLISH IT, THEY CAN DO THAT.

AND THEY WILL STILL SATISFY THE ORDER.

CORRECT.

THAT IS CORRECT.

SO I GUESS PERHAPS THAT'S A CLEANER WAY TO DO IT.

I'M NOT SURE THE WAY YOU SUGGESTED THE ONLY THING, I GUESS, IF, IF WE, WE WE'D NEED TO GIVE THEM A TIME LIMIT, RIGHT? BECAUSE OTHERWISE THIS CAN JUST HANG OUT THERE FOR, BUT WE CANNOT EXTEND BEYOND 90 DAYS WITH THE INFORMATION THAT IS IN FRONT OF US THIS EVENING.

WE DON'T HAVE ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO GO BEYOND 90 DAYS.

SORRY.

IF WE ALREADY DO.

UM, YES.

WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT, THAT, AS WE KNOW, THERE'S A COST TO THE CITY AND THE CITY STAFF, EVERY TIME WE DELAY ONE OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS.

ANYWAY, THOSE ARE MY THOUGHTS.

I DON'T KNOW.

I'D BE HAPPY TO HEAR WHAT OTHERS THINK.

COMMISSIONER MILLER.

ARE YOU MOVING? YOU'RE TRYING TO GET MY ATTENTION.

YOUR HAND DISAPPEARS.

YEAH, I KEEP, I'M NOT SURE I HAVE MY THOUGHTS FULLY FORMED, BUT LET ME, LET ME TRY.

UM, I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE BEFORE MAKING A MOTION.

SO IF, IF WE WERE TO MAKE A MOTION SAYING TO REPAIR, RATHER THAN DEMOLISH WITHIN 90 DAYS, AND THEN AFTER 90 DAYS, WE WOULD SET SOME MINIMAL FINE.

AND THEN IF THE OWNER IS ABLE TO MAKE THOSE REPAIRS, THEY CAN THEN, UM, CA CREDIT THE AMOUNT THEY SPEND ON THE REPAIRS AGAINST THE FINES.

THAT SEEMS LIKE THE MOST STRAIGHTFORWARD PATH.

AND IF THEY DECIDE THAT THEY WANT TO DEMOLISH, INSTEAD, THEY CAN DO THAT.

UM, SO THAT I WAS THINKING OF MOVING THAT UNLESS SOMEONE SEES A PROBLEM WITH THAT, OR HAS ANOTHER IDEA, THE ONLY CHALLENGE IS WE HAVE TO DETAIL WHAT THE THINGS ARE THAT NEED TO BE REPAIRED FOR THEM.

THEN, UM, I DON'T BELIEVE WE DID.

FIND OUT ALL THE EXISTING CODE VIOLATIONS, WHAT WOULD NEED TO BE THE ONLY CAVEAT IS, UH, TO WHAT COMMISSIONER MUELLER WAS PROPOSING.

IF, IF WE WERE TO LOWER THE FINE, IF THERE'S A FINE LINE, UM, BETWEEN LOWERING IT TO GIVE THEM TIME, TO GET THIS WORK IN, LOWERING IT TO THE POINT WHERE IT, NO OFFENSE INTENDED THAT, THAT IF THE HOMEOWNER DECIDES NOT TO PROCEED AS THERE'S, THERE'S REALLY VERY LITTLE INCENTIVE FOR THEM TO ACCELERATE THE PROJECT.

IT'S NOTHING, BUT IT'S NOT THE MAXIMUM, YOU KNOW, I HAVE ONE MORE QUESTION FOR THE SCAPTION JACKSON, CLICK IT.

I MEAN, THAT IS THE INTENTION OF YEAH, NO, I, I, YOU KNOW, SO MAYBE IT'S $200 A WEEK OR SOMETHING.

[00:50:01]

IF DO YOU THINK THAT YOU WOULD KNOW WITHIN 60 DAYS OR 90 DAYS, WHETHER OR NOT YOU'RE GOING TO PROCEED WITH REPAIRS FOR FLOODING OF THE WEEK? YEAH.

CAUSE I, I REALLY HAVE SOME, SOME STUFF I'VE BEEN TO, SO IF THERE BY NOON AT THE END TODAY WENT BY, SO THEN, AND THEN I HAD TRAINING, CAUSE I ALSO WANT A 40 HOUR JOB.

PLUS I TAKE HERE, MY SUSTAINED EATING.

AND SO, UH, I WAS LIKE, HUH.

AND I JUST SAID, YOU KNOW WHAT, I'LL SEE HIM TOMORROW.

AND SO I'LL SKATE OUT, TRY TO GET A CHANCE TO GO SKIING.

MY ONLY CONCERN IF WE ARE TO MODIFY THE ORDER AND SAY, OKAY, EVERYTHING NEEDS TO BE COMPLETED WITHIN 90 DAYS, BUT THEN YOU DECIDE BY THEN WE'RE JUST GOING TO DEMOLISH IT.

I, I WOULD NOT WANT THOSE FINES TO BE SITTING THERE RECRUITING WHILE THEY'RE GETTING EVERYTHING TOGETHER TO ACTUALLY DIVULGE IT.

DOES THAT MAKE SENSE TO BE LIKE, YOU WOULD HAVE TO KEEP MOVING, YOU KNOW, WHICHEVER DIRECTION YOU'RE GOING IN.

IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU RUN.

CALL ONE PERSON BE, DID YOU WANT TO GO AHEAD AND YEAH, I'LL GO AHEAD AND MAKE THE MOTION THAT WE MOVE THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS MAKE THE NECESSARY REPAIRS TO BRING THE STRUCTURE UP TO CODE WITHIN 90 DAYS.

AND THEN, UM, AFT ON THE 91ST DAY BEGAN IMPOSING A FINE OF $200 A WEEK.

UM, AND THAT'S IT, I THINK.

PERFECT COMMISSIONER, MR. MUELLER.

IS THERE A SECOND? ANY CONCERNS? YEAH, I CAN SECOND THAT, UH, I IMAGINE THERE'S MAYBE SOME FINE TUNING IN TERMS OF DAYS AND BUSINESS DAYS AND HOW THAT WORKS, BUT I WILL SECOND, THE SPIRIT OF THE MOTION, MY PREFERENCE WOULD BE OPEN TO DISCUSSION IS THERE IS A GUIDELINE, BUT MY PREFERENCE WOULD BE FOR THE FINES TO BE LESS THAN $200 PER WEEK.

UM, I BELIEVE THERE'S PROBABLY A DOLLAR AMOUNT LOWER THAN THAT.

THAT WOULD STILL BE SUFFICIENTLY MOTIVATING, UH, TO THE PROPERTY OWNER AND OVER $800 A MONTH IS NOT NOTHING.

AND I THINK THAT'S JUST, THOSE ARE MY OPINIONS.

I JUST, I JUST WANT TO REMIND COMMISSIONER IS AT FRANCIS AND I'M NOT IN THE ROOM, SO OPENING.

NO, I'M SORRY.

WE, I HAVEN'T ACTUALLY SEEN THE NEW COMMISSIONERS IN PERSON, BUT THESE, THESE FINES WOULD ALL BE, UM, ONCE THE REPAIRS ARE UNDERWAY, THE COST OF THE REPAIRS WOULD ESSENTIALLY ERASE THE FINES.

SO, YOU KNOW, THE OWNERS WOULD NOT LIKELY PAY THEM UNLESS THEY DON'T DO ANYTHING I GUESS.

SO I JUST WANTED TO TEXT.

AND IF THERE'S A, IF THERE'S A NUMBER, UH, THAT, UH, COMMISSIONER OF ANY KNOW ANY OF THE OTHER COMMISSIONERS HAVE IN MIND AS AN ALTERNATE NUMBER, I, I IMAGINE I'M SURE COMMISSIONER MUELLER AND MYSELF WOULD BE HAPPY TO, TO ENTERTAIN THEM.

I HAVE NO SPECIAL ATTACHMENT TO THE NUMBER OF WE PROPOSED.

SO THERE'S ANOTHER NUMBER THAT OTHERS THINK IS MORE FAIR.

LET'S HEAR IT.

WELL, CAN'T WE CHANGE THIS AT SOME OTHER KIND OF, CAN WE AMEND THIS BECOMES PRACTICAL TO THAT MANDATED WAY THAT A LIGHTER WE TRYING TO CRAFT AN ORDER FOR TONIGHT.

I WOULD LIKE TO GET IT THIS CLOSE TO REALITY.

YOU'RE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT ABOUT THE OFFSETTING COST OF REPAIRS.

I, I DO THINK THAT WE SHOULD JUST KEEP IN MIND THAT THERE ARE SCENARIOS IN WHICH SOME OF THE BINDS WOULD STILL NEED TO BE PAID A LOW BID OR DEMOLITION CAME IN AND THEY GOT DELAYED FOR SOME REASON OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.

I COULD SEE A SITUATION WHERE IF IT'S DELAYED

[00:55:01]

BY A MONTH BECAUSE WE'RE CONTRACTORS SCHEDULING ISSUE, UM, AND THEY, YOU KNOW, ALREADY, YOU'RE GOING TO BE A LITTLE BIT LATE.

AND THEN ALL OF A SUDDEN SHE HAS TO PAY EXTRA A THOUSAND DOLLARS OUT OF POCKET OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.

SO I DEFINITELY GLAD THAT THERE ARE OFFSETTING WAYS TO PAY THE FINES THAT WE WOULD DO AS A SYSTEM TO CREATE A SITUATION THAT BIG, IT COULD BECOME OVERWHELMING, UM, OUT WITH SITUATIONS OUTSIDE OF HER CONTROL WITH, I TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOUR CONCERN.

UM, I DON'T BELIEVE THE FINES ARE ACTUALLY CHARGED TILL MUCH LATER, BUT IF YOU WANT TO PROPOSE ANOTHER NUMBER, THIS IS CASE NUMBER TWO ON THE DOCKET FOR THE C I WAS GOING TO STAY $200.

I WAS GONNA SAY 200 A MONTH INSTEAD OF A WEED THAT'S OKAY WITH ME.

COMMISSIONER FERRARA.

IS THAT ACCEPTABLE? IT SEEMS A LITTLE LOW, BUT YES, IT'S ACCEPTABLE.

SO THE MOTION IS NOW IS AMENDED TO HAVE THE FINES BE $200 A MONTH.

I'M GOING TO CALL THE QUESTION.

SO ALL IN FAVOR OF REVISING STAFF'S RECOMMENDED ORDER SO THAT THE TIMELINE IS NOW 90 DAYS TO COMPLETE THE FOLLOWUP WITHIN 90 DAYS, THE DAY THE ORDER IS FAILED, WHICH IS TO OBTAIN AND FINALIZE ALL NECESSARY PERMITS TO HAVE A GOOD EXAMPLE OF ONE FOR REPAIRS, BUT TO MAKE ALL NECESSARY FAIRS, NOT LISTED, TO MAKE ALL NECESSARY REPAIRS, TO BRING US TO, TO REMEDY ALL OF THE CODE VIOLATIONS, TO REQUEST ENGINES, CLOSE TO CODE, TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE AND ALL THE 91ST DAY FINANCING SPOT, BUT ACHIEVED, UH, THEN FIND WILL BE TO APPROVE IT AT A RATE OF $200 A MONTH.

SORRY, THERE IS LANGUAGE THAT I NEED TO INCLUDE WITHOUT, AND ACTUALLY TO GET MY LAPTOP TO WORK, BUT THERE ARE, I CAN READ THAT.

THAT WOULD BE HELPFUL.

AND FOR A SHELL, A CREW AT A RATE OF 10% PER YEAR FROM THE DATE OF THE ASSESSMENT UNTIL PAID A TOLL.

AND DID I MISS ANY OTHER IMPORTANT? OKAY.

I DON'T HAVE ANOTHER REPAIR.

WAIT.

I'M LIKE, YEAH.

SO COMPLIANCE IS NOT ACHIEVED.

ASSESS A CIVIL PENALTY OF $200 PER MONTH THAT WE'LL CONTINUE TO OFFER IT UNTIL THE KIND OF VISUAL DETERMINES THAT THE REPAIRS TO THE CHART BY THE COMPLETE INTER CHELLA CREW AT A RATE OF 10% PER YEAR FROM THE DATE OF THE ASSESSMENT UNTIL TAKEN FULL.

AND I BELIEVE YOU'VE COVERED EVERYTHING ELSE THAT WOULD BE INCLUDED IN THAT.

AND I WILL CALL THE ROLL CALL FOR THIS.

SO IF YOU ARE A FAVOR, PLEASE INDICATE BY IF YOU'RE ONLINE, PLEASE, WHERE YOU SAY, YOU SAY YES.

AND IF YOU'RE A PERSON THOMPSON, ARE YOU IN FAVOR? YES.

COMMISSIONER, COMMISSIONER, COMMISSIONER.

UH, AND I SEE THAT COMMISSIONER STILL STUCK.

COMMISSIONER BEALER, COMMISSIONER PERRERA AND COMMISSIONER ABILA.

I AM ALSO IN FAMOUS.

ALRIGHT.

UM, THANK YOU FOR COMING TO TALK WITH US AND THANK YOU.

YES, PLEASE.

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE GET OVER AND THE ORDER WILL BE MAILED TO YOU WITHIN A FEW DAYS.

[3. Case Number: CL 2022-049462 Property address: 2900 O Neal Lane / Owner: 2900 Oneal Lane LLC Staff presenter: Lauren Taggart Staff recommendation: Demolish commercial structure]

NEXT ON THE AGENDA FOR THE COMMISSION'S CONSIDERATION IS CASE NUMBER 20 22 0 4 9 4 6 2.

THE ADDRESS FOR THIS CASE IS 900 A MEAL.

IT IS THE BLUE BOOK IN YOUR READERS OR GOOGLE GRAPH FOLDER.

THERE ARE A FEW FACTS ABOUT THE CASE.

THIS CASE IS ABOUT VACANT AND ABANDONED PRIMARY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE AND ONE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE.

THE CASE WAS INITIALLY OPENED IN 2014 AND HAS REMAINED IN VIOLATION.

SINCE THAT TIME, THE DILAPIDATED NEGLECTED STRUCTURES ARE DETERIORATING CONSIDERED DANGEROUS OR REQUIRE DEMOLITION, AND YOUR READERS ARE GOOD AND DRAFT FOLDERS.

YOU WILL FIND THE FOLLOWING EXHIBIT ONE, WHICH CONTAINS THING OF FLIGHT IN CASES FREE COPY OF THE TRAVIS CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT RECORD THAT VERIFIES OWNERSHIP, THE REQUIRED NOTICES OF VIOLATION NOTICES OF

[01:00:01]

HEARING AND POSTINGS EXHIBIT TWO, WHICH CONSISTS OF CODE'S PHOTOGRAPHS MARKED AS EXHIBITS TWO, A TWO B, AND LASTLY, BOTH RECOMMENDED ORDER AUSTIN CODE INSPECTOR.

LAUREN IS HERE TONIGHT TO PRESENT THE PHOTOS AND DISCUSS THE VIOLATIONS AS DEPICTED INSPECTOR TAGGER, PLEASE BEGIN YOUR TESTIMONY, GETTING A NAME MATTER.

CHAIR, CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS.

I'M LAUREN TAGGART.

I'M THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER CURRENTLY ASSIGNED TO THIS CASE.

THIS IS AN ABANDONED SINGLE FAMILY PROPERTY I'M PRESENTING TODAY THAT IS OWNED BY 2,900 O'NEAL LANE, LLC SINCE 2018.

AND THE REGISTERED AGENT IS NORTHWEST REGISTRY, REGISTERED AGENT, LLC.

THE PROPERTY IS AN ABANDONED AND NEGLECTED SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH AN ACCESSORY BUILDING THAT WAS BUILT IN 1961.

THIS HAS BEEN AN ACTIVE PACE SINCE JULY 17TH, 2019 LEGAL NOTICE HAS BEEN SENT, RECEIVED AND POSTED.

THIS LOCATION HAS BEEN AN OCCUPIED NEGLECTED AND HAS BEEN AN ATTRACTIVE NUISANCE TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND IS ATTRACTING TRANSIENTS AND CRIMINAL ACTIVITY THAT IS CAUSING A NEGATIVE IMPACT WITH THE YOUTH BASEBALL FIELDS THAT ARE LOCATED ACROSS THE STREET FROM THIS LOCATION.

THERE ARE ALSO THREE CHURCHES, TWO ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS, AS WELL AS A PRIVATE SCHOOL.

WITHIN ONE MILE OF THIS LOCATION, THERE HAVE BEEN FOUR TO FIVE CLEANUPS NEAR THIS LOCATION UNDER BRIDGE, LOCATED AT PARMER AND MOPAC ONE BLOCK WEST OF THIS LOCATION.

IT HAS REQUIRED STATE AGENCIES LIKE TEXTBOOK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, AS WELL AS OUR CITY DEPARTMENTS LIKE TRANSPORTATION, AUSTIN, FIRE, AUSTIN EMS, AND ALSO POLICE DEPARTMENT TO GET INVOLVED WITH LARGE CLEANUP EFFORTS, AS WELL AS ADDRESSING OTHER ISSUES DUE TO THE PROPERTY, BEING ATTRACTIVE NUISANCE FOR THIS AREA TO DATE, THIS PROPERTY REMAINS IN DISREPAIR AS WELL AS AN ATTRACTIVE NUISANCE.

I WILL BE PRESENTING PHOTOGRAPHS TO A, THROUGH TO E OF THE VIOLATIONS OBSERVED TO DATE.

A, IS A CONJECTURAL PHOTO OF THE FRONT OF THE PROPERTY, WHERE YOU CAN SEE ALL WINDOWS AND DOORS THAT HAVE BEEN BOARDED SECURED.

WE ARE NOT AWARE OF THE, OR THE WINDOWS OR DOORS HAVE BEEN BROKEN OR NOT.

THEY HAVE REMAINED TO BE SECURED THE ENTIRE TIME THAT I'VE HAD THIS CASE.

UH, AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE'S GRAFFITIS OVER THE OPENINGS.

I HAVE ALSO PLACARD A YELLOW PLACARD ON THE FRONT FENCE THAT IS CURRENTLY LOCKED.

AS YOU CAN SEE PHOTOS, TWO B IS A CONTEXTUAL PHOTO OF THE PRIMARY AND EXCESSIVE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE WITH BOARDS OVER THE OPENINGS, AS WELL AS GRAFFITI PHOTO SEE IS A PLACARD THAT HAS BEEN POSTED ON THE EXTERIOR FENCE OF NOTIFICATION OF VACANT STRUCTURE.

THERE HAS BEEN MORE TO UNSECURED PHOTO.

TWO D IS A KIND OF GENERAL PHOTO OF THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE WAS BOARDS OVER THE OPENINGS, AS WELL AS GRAFFITI, AND TO EASE A PHOTO OF THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE SHOWING BROWN BAGS WITH BOARDS ALONG THE FRONT PORCH AREA.

THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.

THANK YOU, ELTON THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN IN THESE PHOTOGRAPHS AND THOSE DESCRIBING THE FINAL FACT FOLK OFFICIAL FOUND THAT THIS STRUCTURE IS A PUBLIC AND AN ATTRACTIVE NUISANCE, AND IT'S CONSIDERED SUBSTANDARD WITH DANGEROUS CONDITIONS.

STAFF ASKED THE COMMISSION TO ADMIT EXHIBIT ONE, WHICH INCLUDES STAFF PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT, AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND OTHER RELEVANT DOCUMENTS AND PHOTOGRAPHS MARKED AS EXHIBITS TWO EIGHTH OF TWO, EIGHT STAFF ALSO REQUESTS THAT THE COMMISSION ADOPT THE PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER THE FOLLOWING ONE REQUIRED TO HONOR COMPLETE FOLLOWING WITHIN 45 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE ORDER IS MAILED.

I OBTAIN FINALIZE ALL NECESSARY PERMITS, BE DEMOLISHED, ALL PORTIONS OF THE RESIDENTIAL AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURE AND REMOVES DEBRIS LEAVING THE LOT CLEAN AND RIGHT, SAME REQUEST INSPECTIONS FROM AUSTIN CODE TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE TWO ON THE 46 DAY FROM CLIENTS HAS NOT BEEN ACHIEVED AND AUTHORIZED.

THE CODE OFFICIALS PROCEED WITH DEMOLITION.

IF WE CONSIDER ALL PORTIONS OF THE RESIDENTIAL AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, INCLUDING ANY ITEMS IN AND AROUND THE STRUCTURES AS DEBRIS IN DISPOSE OF AS SUCH AND BE THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL BE ON NOTICE THAT THE CODE OFFICIAL IS AUTHORIZED TO ASSESS ALL EXPENSES INCURRED AGAINST THE PROPERTY UNLESS EXEMPTED BY THE TEXAS CONSTITUTION LEANED FOR THOSE EXPENSES MAY BE FILED BY THE CITY OF AUSTIN AND RECORDED WITH FRAPPES COUNTY RECORDS.

INTRO INTERCELL ACCRUE AT A RATE OF 10% PER YEAR FROM THE DATE OF THE ASSESSMENT UNTIL PAID IN FULL.

AND THANK YOU.

I WILL GO AHEAD AND ADMIT STATE'S EXHIBITS ONE AND TWO EIGHT THROUGH TO E AND WE DO NOT HAVE ANY PROPERTY

[01:05:01]

REPRESENTATIVES HERE THIS EVENING, PAST THAT I'M AWARE OF.

NO, WE HAVE SCRUBBED, RIGHT.

UM, COMMISSIONERS, DO YOU HAVE A QUESTION FOR TANKER STAFF OR IF YOU'RE JUST SPOT ON DISCUSS AMONGST OURSELVES OR IF ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A POTION GO STRAIGHT TO THAT? NO, I DO HAVE A QUESTION.

UM, SO WHEN YOU FIRST WENT OUT THERE ORIGINALLY, YOU SAW THE BROKEN WINDOWS, THE SAINTS, RIGHT? THE MORTON HAVE REMAINED OVER ALL THE WINDOWS AND DOORS.

SO WE'RE NOT SURE IF THEY'RE BROKEN OR IF THAT WAS A PROACTIVE TO TRY TO KEEP THAT FROM HAPPENING.

UH, THE TRANSIENTS HAVEN'T HAD PULLED OFF THE BOARDS OVER THE GARAGE DOOR AND THE OWNER HAS PUT HER BACK ON, BUT IT REMAINS TO BE A NUISANCE TO WHERE THEY'RE ABLE TO GAIN ACCESS INTO THAT STRUCTURE BECAUSE, AND LIKE THAT FOR SUCH A LONG TIME.

AND SOMEBODY IS CERTAINLY GOING IN THERE, BUT IT, NOT THAT WE'RE FEEDING.

ESPECIALLY FRANCIS FAVORED.

HAVE YOU SPOKEN WITH THE OWNER AND ARE YOU AWARE OF THEIR DESIRE FOR WHAT TO DO WITH THIS PROPERTY? FROM MY UNDERSTANDING YOU'RE WANTING TO BUY IT, THEY'RE WANTING TO SELL IT.

THEY HAVE A POSSIBLE BUYER THAT I HADN'T RECEIVED ANY DOCUMENTATION AS TO THAT.

AND THEY'RE AWARE OF THE SITUATION.

THEY ARE AWARE.

THEY HAVE BEEN SOMEWHAT COOPERATIVE BY GETTING, KEEPING IT MAINTAINED, GETTING, KEEPING IMPORTANT SECURITY.

IF WE HAVE ISSUES THAT THEY'RE NOT DOING ANYTHING WITH THIS PROPERTY, AND IT'S BEEN LIKE THIS FOR SOME TIME, I GUESS.

UM, AND JUST TO BE CLEAR THAT THIS IS NOT CONTACT YOU AT ALL, ACTUALLY THE NOTICES WERE SENT, BUT THIS PARTICULAR AREA, NO, MA'AM CLOSE TO HERE.

WE CAN CLOSE THE HEARING.

UM, I WILL, AGAIN, ALL ROLL CALL FOR THIS.

SO IF YOU WERE IN FAVOR, PLEASE INDICATE BUTTON, YOU KNOW, WAVING OR SAYING YES.

YES, YES.

COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER.

ABILA WERE YOU IN FAVOR? YES.

THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER BEALER.

ARE YOU IN FAVOR? THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER.

FERERA ARE YOU IN FAVOR? OKAY.

THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER.

STUFF'S DONE.

ARE YOU IN FAVOR? YES.

AND I HAVE ALSO INTERVIEWED HER CHAIR FRYBERGER SO THE MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.

[4. Case Number: CL 2022-049593 Property address: 5602 Clay Avenue / Owner: Mark E Cashman Staff presenter: Kenneth Nettle Staff recommendation: Demolish fire-damaged commercial structure]

THANK YOU SO MUCH.

NEIGHBORHOOD IN THIS AREA IS ALMOST ENTIRELY RESIDENTIAL USE.

NEXT ON THE AGENDA FOR THE COMMISSION'S CONSIDERATION IS BASE NUMBER 20 22 0 4 9 5 9 3.

THE ADDRESS FOR THIS CASE IS 5 603 FLIGHT AVENUE EXHIBITS.

FOR THIS CASE, IT CAN BE FOUND IN THE ORANGE BOOKS AND YOUR READERS ARE GOOGLE BROCK HOLDER.

HERE'S SOME FACTS ABOUT THIS CASE.

THIS CASE WAS OPENED IN NOVEMBER, 2021, AS A RESULT OF FIRE, WHICH OCCURRED ON NOVEMBER.

STRUCTURE HAS SUFFERED FROM SEVERE FIRE DAMAGE AND IT'S STRAIGHT THROUGH.

IT'S CONSIDERED UNSAFE WITH DANGEROUS CONDITIONS AND REQUIRES DEMOLITION.

AND YOUR READERS ARE GOOGLE DRIVE FOLDERS.

AND WE'LL FIND THE FOLLOWING EXHIBIT ONE, WHICH CONTAINS THE COMPLAINING CASE HISTORY, A COPY OF THE TRAVIS CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT DISTRICT RECORD THAT VERIFIES OWNERSHIP OR A PHARMACIST VIOLATION NOTICES OF HEARING AND POSTINGS AS WELL AS A FIRE INCIDENT REPORT.

EXHIBIT TWO, WHICH CONSISTS OF CODE CODES, PHOTOGRAPHS MARKED AS EXHIBITS TWO A THROUGH TWO AGE, AND LASTLY, BOTH RECOMMENDED ORDER AUSTIN CODE INSPECTOR.

CAN IT NETHERLANDS ASSIGNED TO THIS CASE? HE IS UNABLE TO BE HERE TONIGHT AND SUPERVISOR DAVID DOWNING IS HERE DISPLACED TO PRESENT THE EXHIBIT PHOTOS AND DISCUSS THE VIOLATIONS AS EFFECTIVE SUPERVISOR DAILY.

PLEASE BEGIN YOUR TESTIMONY IS THANK YOU COMMISSIONERS FOR HEARING THIS CASE.

UM, 5,602 CLAY AVENUE IS A SINGLE STORY COMMERCIAL BUILDING FOR OFFICE AND STORAGE.

USE YOUR BURNET ROAD IN CENTRAL OFFICE, WHICH THE NEIGHBORHOOD IS LOCALLY KNOWN AS BRENTWOOD OR GRODDECK RIDGE.

UM, A FIRE OCCURRED ON FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 19TH, 2021 AFD SUCCESSFULLY PUT OUT THE FIREARM, THE STRUCTURE AT 56 0 2 CLAY AVENUE SUBSTANTIALLY DAMAGED, ADJACENT TO THIS BUILDING IMMEDIATELY TO THE SOUTH IS A VERY LARGE MULTI-FAMILY BUILDING THAT EXTENDS FROM CLAY AVENUE ALL THE WAY THROUGH TO BURN IT ROAD.

UM, IT'S KNOWN AS BURNET FLATS.

IF YOU PASS IT ON THE BURNET ROADS THOUGH, THE ADJACENT PROPERTY TO THE NORTH IT'S 6 0 2 IS A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, 5 6 0 4 CLEAR THE STREET

[01:10:01]

AUSTIN CODE DEPARTMENT HAS NOTIFIED THE OWNER ABOUT COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS AND THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION AT THE SITE.

AUSTIN CODE DEPARTMENT HAS SUCCESSFULLY CONTACT, ATTACHMENT AND CONVEYED THE COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS.

WE HAVE SPOKEN TO MR. CASHMAN, HIS TENANTS AND HIS BROTHER.

THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION IDENTIFIES THIS DANGEROUS AUSTIN CODE DEPARTMENT, CONTRACTED WITH A VENDOR TO INSTALL A FENCE AT THE SITE TO PROTECT NEIGHBORS AND PASSING PEDESTRIANS FROM AREA AUSTIN CODE DEPARTMENT ESTIMATES THAT THE DAMAGE IS BEYOND 50% OF THE STRUCTURE AND RECOMMENDS THE DEMOLITION AS THE BEST AVAILABLE SOLUTION TO THE PROPERTY CONDITION.

DEMOLITION WILL ELIMINATE THIS BUILDING AS AN ATTRACTIVE NUISANCE AND AS A NEIGHBORHOOD LIKE THE VISION FOR THE AREA, I WON'T REFER TO THE PHOTOS.

UM, SO TWO 80 IS FROM NOT LONG AFTER THE FIRE.

THIS IS 1216 OF 20.1.

UM, YOU SEE THE SINGLE-STORY BRICK STRUCTURE IS 5,602 CLAY AVENUE.

AND JUST TO THE LEFT IS, UM, THE MULTIFAMILY BUILDING THAT EXTENDS THROUGH TO BURNHAM ROAD.

AND THERE'S SOME RUBBISH STILL REMAINING IN THE ART FROM THE FIRE, AND THEN GO TO, TO BE THIS SHOWS THE PROXIMITY WHEN 56 0 2 CLAY AVENUE AND THE ADJACENT MULTIFAMILY BURN FLATS, UM, OR AS CLOSE TO EACH OTHER AS ZONING WILL ALLOW, DON'T HAVE TO, TO SEE, UM, THIS IS THE STREET VIEW FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

UM, AGAIN, WE SEE THE FIRE DAMAGE.

THE FENCE HAS BEEN PLACED AT THIS POINT AND THERE'S, UM, BURN OF FLATS TO THE LEFT AND THE NEXT PHOTO.

UM, THIS IS THE FENCE WE HAD CONTRACTED FOR INSTALLATION.

UM, THE DANGEROUS PLACARD AT THE SITE.

YOU CAN SEE THE FIRE DAMAGE AND SOME OF THE RUBBISH THAT'S BEING CONTAINED.

BEHIND THE FENCE.

UH, THE VEHICLES REMAINED ON SITE THROUGHOUT THIS CASE MANAGEMENT.

IT'S AN UNLICENSED NOT RUNNING NEXT PHOTO.

UM, THERE'S MORE CLEARLY OVER THE TOP OF THE FENCE JUST TO SEE THE RUBBER SIS REMAINED ON SITE.

THE OWNERS KEPT IT THERE AND THE FIRE DAMAGE TO THE STRUCTURE.

AND THEN THE NEXT PHOTO, AGAIN, THIS IS SORT OF THAT SAME VIEW.

UM, THAT'S THE VEHICLE THAT'S REMAINED ON SITE.

THERE'S ALSO THE CAR PORT AND A BOAT THERE.

UM, JUST A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE.

THIS IS FURTHER INTO THE LOT.

LOOKING BACK TOWARDS THE STREET VIEW, SEE THE RESIDENTIAL USE BEHIND AND THE NEXT PHOTO.

UM, THIS IS WHERE THE FIRE DEPARTMENT CAN GO BAIT THE FIRE.

NOVEMBER 19TH.

UM, BUILDING WAS VACANT AT THE TIME THEY USED TO SOLVE TO GET THROUGH THE GARAGE DOOR.

UM, AND OUR, THE BUILDING PUT OUT THE FIRE SMASHED THE, ALL THE STORE TO GO IN.

THIS IS ALL STORES THE LEFT AND THEN SMALL OFFICES TO THE RIGHT, IN THE SINGLE STORY.

COMMERCIAL BUILDING.

ONE MORE PICTURE.

IS THAT IT? YEAH.

THEY GO ON TO THE REST OF THE NEXT EDITION.

SEVEN CHANGED REALLY THROUGHOUT THE CASE MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE OWNER, I THINK CONSISTENT DEMOLITION IS RECOMMENDED, BUT ACTIONS REQUIRED.

THAT'S OUR CASE.

THAT'S A BIG EXISTING CONDITION SHOWN IN THESE PHOTOGRAPHS AND THOSE PRESCRIBED IN THE FINDINGS OF FACT, SO THAT THE PATIENT FOUND THAT THIS STRUCTURE IS A PUBLIC AND AN ATTRACTIVE NUISANCE.

AND IT'S CONSIDERED UNSAFE WITH SUBSTANDARD AND DANGEROUS CONDITIONS.

STAFF ASKED THE PERMISSION TO ADMIT EXHIBIT ONE, WHICH INCLUDES STAFF PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT, AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND OTHER RELEVANT DOCUMENTS AND PHOTOGRAPHS MARKED AS EXHIBITS TWO EIGHT THROUGH TWO H STAFF ALSO REQUESTS THAT THE OWNER ADOPT THE PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT EXCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER THE FOLLOWING REQUIRE THAT THE YOUNGER COMPLETE FOLLOWING WITHIN 45 DAYS FROM THE DATE THE ORDER WAS MAILED AND OBTAINING FILE ALL NECESSARY PERMITS.

THEY DEMOLISH ALL PORTIONS OF THE COMMERCIAL STRUCTURE AND REMOVE AS DEBRIS LEAVING THE LOT CLEAN AND RIGHT SI REQUEST INSPECTIONS FROM AUSTIN.

GO VERIFY COMPLIANCE.

TWO ON THE 46 DAY OF COMPLIANCE HAS NOT BEEN ACHIEVED AND AUTHORIZED.

THE CODE OFFICIAL WILL TO PROCEED WITH DEMOLITION AND TO CONSIDER ALL PORTIONS OF THE COMMERCIAL STRUCTURE, INCLUDING ITEMS IN AND AROUND THE STRUCTURE AS THE DEBRIS AND DISPOSE OF AS SUCH AND BE THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL BE ON NOTICE THAT THE CODE OFFICIAL WAS AUTHORIZED TO ASSESS ALL EXPENSES INCURRED AGAINST THE PROPERTY UNLESS IT'S ENTERED BY THE TEXAS CONSTITUTION.

ELAINE, FOR THOSE EXPENSES MAY BE FOLLOWED BY THE CITY OF BOSTON OR RECORDED WITH THE TRAVIS COUNTY DEEP RECORDS INTO OUR SHELL.

IT GREW AT A RATE OF 10% PER YEAR FROM THE DATE OF THE ASSESSMENT UNTIL PAID.

[01:15:02]

I'LL GO AHEAD.

AND INTO A, TO H AND M SUPERVISOR DOWNING.

I ACTUALLY HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU TOO.

YOU, YOU HAD SAID THAT YOU HAD SPOKEN WITH THE ALL VERIZON YES.

AND WITH SOME TENANTS, DID YOU SAY THAT? UM, YEAH, THERE'S NO ONE REMAINING AT THIS BUILDING, BUT THE TEEKAT RECORDS SHOWED A, ANOTHER PROPERTY OVER A WHITE HORSE OWNED BY THE SAME PERSON AND CONTACTED THE DEFENDANT THERE.

UM, BUT WE DIDN'T HAVE ANY OTHER MAILING ADDRESS FOR MR. CASHMAN.

UM, THAT TENANT, UM, OF COURSE DOES BUSINESS MR. CASHMAN AS HIS TENANT AND WAS ABLE TO GET IN.

AND WE HAD A CONFERENCE CALL ONE DAY.

UH, I EXPLAINED THIS HEARING, UM, YOU KNOW, EXPLAIN THE ESCALATIONS AND ACTIONS REQUIRED, UH, BUT EVEN SPOKE TO, UH, MR. CASHMAN'S BROTHER HE'D COME DOWN.

SO SOME SORT OF HELP ARRANGE MATTERS.

AND DID THE OWNER GIVE ANY INDICATION OF WHAT HE INTENDS TO DO WITH THE PROPERTY? WHAT HE HOPES TO DO? THE SCOPE OF HIS ACTIONS ARE AREN'T EXACTLY CLEAR.

YOU HIT HIS PERCEPTION AND INTENTION OF WHAT SHOULD BE DONE, HOW IT'S GOING TO BE DONE, HAVE AN ALIGNED WITH WHAT WE'RE RECOMMENDING THUS FAR.

YEAH, IT'S BEEN, YEAH, IT'S BEEN UNI.

UH, TO MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS HAVE QUESTIONS FOR SUPERVISOR DOWNING OR FOR CITY STAFF ON THIS.

THERE, THERE ARE NO PROPERTY REPRESENTATIVES HERE IN PERSON.

UM, YEAH, SO I THINK I SAW A NOTE SAYING THAT MR. CASHMAN, AND HE SAID HE DID NOT HAVE RESOURCES, BUT AT SOME POINT YOU RECALL, I HAVEN'T HAD THAT COMMUNICATION.

UM, AND THAT WOULDN'T SURPRISE ME.

IT'S YOU HAVE TO BE PERFECTLY FRANK I'VE ASKED HIS BROTHER IF MR. CATHERINE IS AWARE OF THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY AND YOU KNOW, HIS OPTIONS TO, UM, FIND RESOURCES TO HANDLE THIS MATTER.

AND IT SEEMED TO BE THAT HE'S AWARE OF THE VALUE AND THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THINGS.

UM, THAT'S SHOWN A WILLINGNESS TO PURSUE A PATH WHERE WE RECOMMEND.

AND HE, TO YOUR KNOWLEDGE, THEY NEVER MENTIONED ANYTHING ABOUT INSURANCE PAYOUT OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT TO FIX STATION.

THEY HAVEN'T DISCUSSED THOSE MATTERS WITH THEM HERE.

SO THAT'S DIFFICULT.

UM, I'LL BE HAPPY TO MAKE A MOTION IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS, UH, QUESTIONS.

SURE.

WE CAN CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

THERE'S NOT A LOT WE CAN DO WITHOUT HEARING OWNERS.

SO THEN WHAT WOULD SEND TODAY? SO BASED ON THE EXHIBITS AND THE, UH, THE BOARD OF THE INSPECTOR, I SAY I'D LIKE TO MOVE TO ACCEPT THE PROPOSED ORDER STAFF.

EXCELLENT.

UNLESS THERE'S FURTHER DISCUSSION.

I'LL GO AHEAD AND CALL THE QUESTION AND AGAIN, I'LL DO IT BY WE'LL CALL COMMISSIONER THOMPSON.

ARE YOU IN FAVOR OF SNIPS RECOMMENDED ORDER, WHICH IS POLISHED WITHIN 45 DAYS? YES.

COMMISSIONER, HAVE ANY COMMISSIONER ABILA YES.

COMMISSIONER MUELLER.

COMMISSIONER HERRERA.

YES, I SUPPORTED.

AND UNFORTUNATELY, AFTER THIS BOAT AND WHEN I HAVE TO LEAVE ALL OF YOU, BUT I DO SUPPORT IT.

THAT ITEM NUMBER FIVE ON THE AGENDA IS REGARDING A MULTI FAMILY PROPERTY AND THE REPEATED VISIT OR BRAND LOCATED AT 22 0 1 WEST WILLIAMS DANNON DRIVE.

I HAVE ALSO PAID TAKE STAFF'S RECOMMENDED ORDER.

[5. Case Numbers: CL 2022-049575; CL 2022-049558; CL 2022-049564; and CL 2022-049543 Property address: 2201 W. William Cannon Drive, Exterior of Buildings 5 and 6 (2020) and Buildings 4 and 5 (2021), aka Southland Apartments/ Owner: Southland Apartments, LLC Staff presenter: James Adams Staff ecommendation: Repair Repeat Offender Program multi-family commercial structures]

NOW YOU'LL BE HEARING TESTIMONY REGARDING THE EXTERIOR OR BUILDINGS FIVE AND SIX, WHICH WERE 2022 CDS CASES AND BUILDINGS FOUR AND FIVE EXTREME IS CASE NUMBER SEAL 20 22 0 4 9 5 7 5.

[01:20:01]

NEXT YEAR, BUILDING 6 20 20 IS FACED NUMBER TWO, YELL 2020 TWOS, 0 4 5 5 8 22 0 4 9 5 6 4.

AND THE EXTERIOR BUILDING 5 20 21 IT'S CASE NUMBER SEAL 20 22 0 4 9 5 4 3 EXHIBITS CAN BE FOUND IN THE GOLD BOOKS IN THE GOOGLE DRIVE FOLDER.

ANDREW READERS.

I HAVE ALSO INCLUDED A CHART OF THE BOX OF I HAVE GOT THE CHART, SO WE DON'T HAVE, SORRY.

UM, IF IT'S IN THE GOLD BOOKS IN YOUR GOOGLE DRIVE FOLDER AND READ THEM, THIS PROPERTY IS IN THE REPEAT OFFENDER PROGRAM.

IT'S STRUCTURED TO HAVE SUBSTANDARD CONDITIONS REQUIRE HIRING REPAIR AND YOUR READERS YOU'LL FIND THE FOLLOWING EXHIBIT ONE, WHICH CONTAINS A COPY OF THE TRAVIS AND HAZEL DISTRICT RECORD TO VERIFY SOMERSET REQUIRED NOTICES OF HEARING AND POSTINGS AS WELL AS A STRUCTURAL MAP OF THE PROPERTY EXHIBITS.

NUMBER TWO THROUGH EIGHT, EVEN NUMBERED EXHIBITS, I'M SORRY, EVEN NUMBER EXHIBITS TWO THROUGH EIGHT, CONTAIN THE COMPLAINTS IN CASE HISTORIES AND THE NOTICES OF VIOLATION.

ODD NUMBERED EXHIBITS THREE THROUGH NINE J CONSISTS OF CODE CODES.

PHOTOGRAPHS MARKED AS PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PROPERTY VIOLATIONS.

AND LASTLY CODES RECOMMENDED ORDERS.

AUSTIN CODE INSPECTOR PHILIP BOSLEY IS ASSIGNED TO THIS CASE.

SPECTER BOSLEY IS UNABLE TO BE HERE TONIGHT AND IN HIS PLACE, SUPERVISOR JAMES ADAMS IS HERE TO PRESENT THE EXHIBIT FEMINISTS FOR THESE CASES AND WE'LL DISCUSS THE VIOLATIONS AS THEY ARE EVICTED.

SUPERVISOR ADAMS. PLEASE BEGIN YOUR TESTIMONY.

THANK YOU FOR SALLY.

GOOD EVENING.

MADAM CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS.

THANK YOU FOR THE PRIVILEGE OF YOUR TIME.

AND HERE EACH CASE I AM A SUPERVISOR AT THE REPEAT OFFENDER PROGRAM.

UH, APPARENTLY GOT A BOTTLE OF INSIDE THESE CASES.

OF COURSE, I HAVE BEEN DOING THIS A LOT IN THE MULTIFAMILY PROPERTY THAT I AM PRESENTING TODAY IS ONLY MYSELF THEN APARTMENTS, LLC AT TEN SIX ZERO ONE FM ROAD 2 2 2, NUMBER R ONE THREE FOR A PASTA TEXAS 7 8 7 3 0 4 CORE ENTITY CAN THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY BEING PRESENT IS CURRENTLY REGISTERED TO THE REPEAT OFFENDER PROGRAM.

IT HAS BEEN SINCE AUGUST, 2019 BUILDINGS, FIVE AND SIX.

THIS PROPERTY IS A TWO-STORY COMPLEX, WHICH CONSISTS OF SEVEN BUILDINGS WITH 72 WEEKENDS, A PERIODIC INSPECTION OR BUILDING FIVE AND SIX WAS CONDUCTED AROUND JANUARY 21ST, 2020 NLBS WERE SENT ON NOVEMBER 19TH, 2021 AND POSTED NOVEMBER 22ND, 2021.

THESE CASES ARE STILL OPEN FROM THE PERIODIC INSPECTIONS.

LEGAL NOTICE HAS BEEN SENT, RECEIVED AND POSTED BUILDING FOUR AND FIVE OF THIS PROPERTY IS A TWO-STORY COMPLEX, WHICH CONSISTS OF SEVEN BUILDINGS WITH 72 UNITS FOR BUILDING FOUR AND FIVE WAS CONDUCTED AROUND JULY 1ST, 2021.

THE NLBS WERE SENT ON JULY 1ST, 2021 AND POSTED SEPTEMBER 29TH, 2021.

THESE CASES ARE STILL OPEN FROM THE PERIODIC INSPECTION.

LEGAL NOTICE HAS BEEN SAID, RECEIVED AND POSTED TO DATE.

THESE VIOLATIONS REMAIN OPEN AND THE STRUCTURAL MAINTENANCE VIOLATIONS STILL REMAIN IN DISREPAIR.

AT THIS TIME.

STAFF IS RECOMMENDING STRUCTURAL STRUCTURAL REPAIRS.

I WILL BE PRESENTING PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE VIOLATIONS OBSERVED TODAY.

BUILDING FIVE THREE, A B C D E F, AND BUILDING SIX FIVE A B C D E F AND G EXHIBIT THREE EIGHT.

I'M GOING TO BAD.

FIVE IS DETERIORATED AND NOT SEALED.

EXHIBIT THREE, A IS A CONTEXTUAL PHOTOGRAPH OF THE APARTMENT COMPLEX SIGN SOUTH NOW APARTMENTS REBATE.

EXHIBIT THREE, B PHOTOGRAPH IS SHOWING THE SIGN FOR BUILDING NUMBER FIVE, THREE C EXHIBIT THREE C.

PHOTOGRAPH IS A ROOF DECKING FACIAL ALONG THE REAR SIDE OF BUILDING

[01:25:01]

3D EXHIBIT 3D PHOTOGRAPH IS A ROOF BEAM AND DECKING ON THE REAR SIDE OF THE BUILDING OF BUILDING FIVE THAT IS DETERIORATED AND THREE EXHIBIT THREE E SOURCEGRAPH IS THE SECOND FLOOR UNIT TWO TO FOUR IN SYRIA.

EXCELLENT.

FIVE E IS A PHOTOGRAPH OF A MORE OVERVIEW, LARGER AREA WITH THE FACIAL AND DECKING SEALS DETERIORATED AND OPEN FIVE F EXHIBIT FIVE IS A PHOTOGRAPH CLOSER SHOWING THE VIEW OF THE FACIAL AREA, DETERIORATION AND OPENING THAT SEALED CLOSED FIVE G EXHIBIT FIVE G'S PHOTOGRAPH IS A CLOSER VIEW SHOWING ADDITIONAL FACIAL AREA DETERIORATION BUILDING FOR 708, B C D E F G.

AND BUILDING FIVE NINE A B C D E F G H I N J SEVEN EIGHT EXHIBIT SEVEN, EIGHT PHOTOGRAPHS SHOWS THE SIGN FOR THE BUILDING OF NUMBER NUMBER FOUR 70 EXHIBIT SEVEN, B IS A SECOND FLOOR UNIT 2, 1 8 BUILDING UNIT, EXCUSE ME, UNIT 2, 2 18 BUILDING FOUR SEVEN C EXHIBIT SEVEN, SEES A PHOTOGRAPH OF THE BEAM SEPARATING UNIT TWO, 1-870-EXHIBIT 70 IS A PHOTOGRAPH SHOWING THE BUILDINGS FOUR AND FIVE IN CONTACT AND TOUCHING EACH OTHER SEVEN E EXHIBIT 70 IS A PHOTOGRAPH OF UNIT TWO 18 LOCATED LOCATION FOR THE OVER LEVEL LANDING SEVEN F EXHIBITS.

SECOND PHOTOGRAPH OF THE LEVEL OF THE LEVEL IN FRONT OF UNIT TWO 18 SHOWING AN ANGLE OF 5.3 TO 5.4 DEGREES SLOPE ON THE WALKWAY SEVEN G EXHIBIT 70 IS A CLOSER VIEW SHOWING THE DIFFERENT SLOPE ANGLE ON THE LEVEL IN FRONT OF UNIT 2 18, 908 EXHIBIT NINETIES PHOTOGRAPHS TO SHOW THE SIGN FOR BUILDING NUMBER 5 99.

B IS A PHOTOGRAPH OF UNIT 1 24 AT BUILDING FIVE ON THE FIRST FLOOR NINE C EXHIBIT NINE C IS SHOWING THE WALKWAY FOR WEARING CRACK IN FRONT OF UNIT 1 24 90 EXHIBIT 90 PHOTOGRAPH OF THE LEVEL IN FRONT OF UNIT 1 24, SHOWING AN ANGLE OF 4.4 DEGREE SLOPE ON THE WALKWAY.

90 EXHIBIT 90 IS A CLOSER VIEW SHOWING THE SLOPE ANGLE ON THE LEVEL IN FRONT OF UNIT 1 24, 9 F EXHIBIT NINE F IS A PHOTOGRAPH OF UNIT 24, EXCUSE ME, UNIT 2 24 AT BUILDING NUMBER FIVE ON THE SECOND FLOOR.

90 EXHIBIT 90 IS SHOWING ONE TWO IN THE WALKWAY GOING FRACKED IN FRONT OF YOU.

2 24, 9 H EXHIBIT NINE IS PHOTOGRAPH OF THE LEVEL OF NEXT TO UNIT 2 24, SHOWING THE SHOWING AN ANGLE OF 4.2 DEGREES SLOPE ON THE WALKWAY NINE EXHIBIT NINE, I, AS A CLOSER VIEW, SHOWING STILL ANGLE ON THE LEVEL NEXT TO UNIT 2 24, 9 EXHIBIT NINE J IS A PHOTOGRAPH SHOWING THE BUILDINGS FOUR, EXCUSE ME, BUILDINGS, FIVE AND FOUR IN CONTACT AND TOUCHING EACH OTHER.

THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND I AM AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS PARTICULAR TIME.

THANK YOU FOR THAT WAS FOR THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN IN THESE PHOTOGRAPHS.

[01:30:01]

AND THOSE DESCRIBED IN THE FINDINGS OF FACT, THE CODE OFFICIAL FOUND THAT THESE STRUCTURES ARE REPUBLICAN ATTRACTIVE NUISANCE IN SUBSTANDARD CONDITIONS, STAFF ASSET COMMISSIONS READ THEIR EXHIBITS ONE THROUGH NINE J CONSISTING OF EXHIBIT ONE AND ALL EVEN NUMBERED EXHIBITS, WHICH INCLUDE STAFF PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT CONCLUSIONS, BLOT, AND OTHER RELEVANT DOCUMENTS.

AND ON NUMBERED EXHIBITS BEGINNING WITH EXHIBIT THREE, WHICH ARE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PROPERTY AND THE VIOLATIONS ALSO CHAIR FOUR AND READ THE RECOMMENDATIONS.

I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A REQUEST SINCE THE LANGUAGE IS IDENTICAL IN EACH OF THE FOUR RECOMMENDED ORDERS.

PLEASE ALLOW ME TO READ IT ONCE WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT WE ARE REQUESTING THAT SEPARATE ORDERS BE ACHIEVED IN EACH OF THE BULLET BASES.

YES, PLEASE PROCEED.

STAFF ALSO REQUESTS THAT THE PERMISSION OF DOC WITH PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS BLOCK, ALL FOUR CASES, AND IN EACH CASE ORDERED THE FOLLOWING ONE, OBTAINING FINALIZE ALL NECESSARY PERMITS, FAVORITE BARRELS SITE OF VIOLATIONS TO COMMERCIAL MULTIFAMILY MULTIFAMILY STRUCTURE WITHIN 45 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE ORDERS, MAILED THREE REQUEST INSPECTIONS FROM AUSTIN, GO TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE AND FOUR ON THE 46 DAY.

IF COMPLIANCE HAS NOT BEEN ACHIEVED, ASSESS A CIVIL PENALTY OF $1,000 PER WEEK, THEY WILL CONTINUE TO ACCRUE UNTIL THE CODE OFFICIAL DETERMINES THAT THE REPAIRS REQUIRED BY THIS ORDER ARE COMPLETE INTER SHALL ACCRUE AT A RATE OF 10% PER YEAR FROM THE DATE OF THE ASSESSMENT UNTIL QUITE A DIFFICULT.

I WILL GO AHEAD AND FIT STAFF'S EXHIBITS ON 2, 4, 6 AND EIGHT AT 3 8, 3 3 7 5 8 OR FIVE G SEVEN, EIGHT THROUGH 17, AND DIED A THROUGH NINE J.

AND WE DO HAVE PROPERTY REPRESENTATIVES WITH US HERE THIS EVENING, COMMISSIONER FRANCIS.

WE WOULD TYPICALLY HOLD QUESTIONS.

SO AFTER THAT, SO I AM SO SORRY.

YEAH, THERE ARE HOW MANY, THREE, YES, PLEASE.

AGAIN, YES.

SORRY.

YES, WE DO WANT TO HEAR HER ABILITY AND THEN IF YOU COULD JUST STATE YOUR NAME AND I HAVE SOME NAMES HERE, BUT I'M NOT SURE.

UM, GLORIA LAMB AND STUFF.

OKAY, GREAT.

COULD GO AHEAD AND PROCEED.

AND THANK YOU.

HELPING YOU TO, THIS WAS THAT FIRST OPPORTUNITY TO SO MUCH AURA EXPLAIN THE WHOLE PROCESS.

UM, I HAVE PREPARED SOME APRIL, I DON'T KNOW, BETTER THAN ON THE SCREEN.

CAUSE THERE ARE A LOT OF REPORTS, SO OKAY.

BUT IF IT'S EASIER TO WRITE, IT PROBABLY IS EASIER FOR US, BUT FOR EVERYONE, SHE WAS VERY THOROUGH ON WHAT I NEED.

SO, UM, SO IN LIGHT OF KIND OF YOU TOLD ME YOU HAD FIVE MINUTES, SO I SUMMARIZE EVERYTHING FROM PATIENT.

AND, UM, AND THAT IS, UM, AND I'M GOING TO GO THROUGH EACH OF PAGE CD AND I DON'T THINK IT'S EXACTLY WHAT WAS IN IT, BUT IT DOES TOO.

IT DOES DESCRIBE EACH OF THE CV AND THE DESCRIPTION.

MAKE, OBVIOUSLY WE HAD A LOT OF NON-PAYING TENANTS.

IF YOU GO BACK TO THE FIRST PAGE FIRST, LET HIM KNOW WHEN YOU'RE READY FOR YES, I'M READY.

SO THE FIRST ONE IS A CV TWENTY TWENTY ONE, TEN THREE SIX FIVE.

UM, THIS IS IN REBAR TO BUILDING, UM, FIVE WHERE AS EXPLAINED THAT IT WAS A SLOPING OVER FOUR WEEKS, UM, TO THE EXTERIOR SHOWING SOME CRACKS AND SEPARATION.

UM, THIS IS THE EXACT WORDING OF THE CV.

UM, SO WE HAVE, UH, CONTACTED, UH, UH, FOUNDATION REPAIR COMPANY.

AND WE DID THAT ACTUALLY OCTOBER 26TH, 2020, BUT YOU KNOW, THEN IT KIND OF FIT US.

UM, THIS LAP, THE PEER COMPANY, WASN'T ABLE TO FULLY GO INTO EACH UNIT BECAUSE A LOT ABOUT SIGNIFICANCE, NOT WANT ANYONE TO SEE THE UNIT DOING THE PANDEMIC.

UM, AND ALSO INDEPENDENT

[01:35:01]

SO, UM, HOWEVER, UH, JANUARY 28TH, 2022, UM, WE HAD THE CONTACT HAVE COMPLETED THE WORK.

UM, IN FACT AT THAT DAY, UM, SPECTRA WAS THERE.

HE OBSERVED THAT IT WAS THE CONTACT THAT DID IT.

UM, THEY COMPLETED THE WORK.

UM, THEY GAVE US A WARRANTY, UH, WHICH IS ON YOUR EXHIBIT.

THIS THE ONLY EXHIBIT IT'S SPEED, UM, LEVEL OF BEST FOUNDATION WAS THE ONE THAT THEY NEED TO PULL BACK AND POINT.

THEN WE LOOK AT THE STRUCTURE AND IDENTIFY WHAT NEEDS TO BE REPAIRED.

THEY WENT AND SET UP THE FOUNDATION AND GAVE ME LIKE SOME WARRANTY.

SO ANYTHING THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE, UM, BECAUSE AGAIN, UM, UTILIZE THAT RESOURCE, UM, THEN THEY FOLLOW UP WITH THE ENGINEERING OR SAYING ALL THE WORKS WILL COMPLETE IT.

AND THAT WAS GIVEN, UM, THAT WAS SUBMITTED ON MARCH 28TH, 2022.

SO THE BUILDING IS SOUND, THE FOUNDATION IS, YOU KNOW, CHECK WITH THE INQUIRY REPORT.

UM, SO WE BELIEVE THAT VALOR'S NEEDS TO BE CLOSED AS YOU COMPLETED.

SO IF YOU WANT TO REVIEW SOME OF THEIR ENGINEERING WORK, PLEASE LET ME KNOW.

SHOULD I CONTINUE? UH, ONE, UH, UH, SHOULDN'T BE TOO LONG.

WELL, I WOULD SAY, PLEASE CONTINUE.

CONTINUE.

WE HAD THIS VERY SPECIFIC QUESTION.

SO THAT'S THIS ONE NUMBER ONE.

SO ON THE NEXT ONE, NEXT SLIDE.

UM, THIS IS, UM, THE BUILDING FOR, UM, UM, IDENTIFYING THE BUILDINGS FOR, UM, THE STRUCTURE ON THE LEFT SIDE OF UNIT TWO 18, UM, IN CONTACT.

WELL, NOT IN CONCEPT, I WHERE THERE'S A GAP AS THE PICTURE.

I THINK WE TOOK THE SAME PICTURE, UM, WHERE THE GAP IS.

UM, OKAY.

SO, UM, THIS IS BUILDING FOR BUILDING FOUR IN 2018, WE HAD ALREADY ADDRESSED THAT ISSUE AND, UM, METAL, UM, PRINTING METAL STRUCTURED TO SUPPORT OR AUGMENT THE SUPPORT OF THAT BUILDING.

AND THAT WAS, UM, IF YOU COULD GO INTO YOUR EXHIBIT AGAIN.

UM, SO WE HAVE SEVEN BUILDINGS BUILDING FOUR AND BUILDING SEVEN WAS ADDRESSED BECAUSE WE FELT THAT THIS MIGHT BE SOME ISSUE CAUSE HE SPOKE ABOUT BUILDS IN 1972.

UM, SO IF YOU CAN SEE THE JOURNEY, UM, THESE ARE THE POSTS AND THE METAL FROM THE POST THAT WAS ADDED ON TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING.

UM, THIS, THESE ARE THE DRAWINGS THAT WAS DONE.

UM, WE HAVEN'T REQUESTED THE CITY OF AUSTIN TO DO AN INSPECTION.

UM, AND ALSO WE HAD A PERMIT AND THE PERMIT IS THE TAP AS WELL.

UM, I WOULD'VE BEEN ABLE TO GET THE DEPENDENT, UM, BUT IT'S ONLINE.

SO I SCREENSHOT IT AND FINISHED THE PERMIT ONLINE, SHOWING ALSO SAID FIND A BUILDING.

SO, UM, SO THE PAST, UM, BUT THIS IS ALSO THE CITY OF AUSTIN REPORTS SHOWING THAT THOSE METAL STRUCTURE IS SOUND AND SUPPORTS THE BUILDING.

UM, AS YOU CAN SEE THE POPE, UM, SAW THERE WAS A GAP WE UNDERSTAND THAT MIGHT BE AN ISSUE.

SO WE SUBSEQUENTLY MAYBE STEEL THE GAP.

UM, SO YOU CAN SEE THE BEFORE PICTURE AND THE AFTER PICTURE AND THAT'S COMPLETED.

SO IF WE BELIEVE THAT THE STRUCTURE IS SOUND AS BASED ON THE INSPECTION THAT YOU SEE IN THE EXHIBIT, UM, DONE BY THE CITY INSPECTION, AS WELL AS ON THE STANDING THAT WE SEALED THAT GAP, I BELIEVE THAT ALSO SHOULD CLOSE EVALUATION.

SO THERE WAS UH, OH, THAT'S FIVE MINUTE.

WELL, ACTUALLY I WAS GOING TO ASK IF YOU COULD BRIEFLY SUMMARIZE THE REST IF YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE, AT LEAST.

WE ARE REPLACING AND FIXING THOSE SECTION THAT THE CODE ENFORCER IDENTIFIED AS SOON AS HE IDENTIFIED THEM AND PROVIDE THE DRAWING.

SO THE OTHER ONE IS ALL ABOUT THE ROOF.

SO WE HAVE, UM, WE HAVE BEEN IN INSURANCE CLAIM WITH THAT INSURANCE TO REPLACE ALL THE ROOF.

UM, THAT'S IN PROCESS, OF COURSE, THE INSURANCE INSURANCES GIVING US A LITTLE BIT OF, UM, UH, YOU KNOW, DELAY ON IT.

UM, SO WE DID NOT WANT TO REPLACE ALL THE BOOTH, BUT THAT IS NOT AN ESSENTIAL.

UM, BUT WHILE WE ARE HAVING THIS ISSUE,

[01:40:01]

I MEAN THE PICTURES WE KNOW EXACTLY WHICH AREA WE HAVE ONCE WE GET THE INSURANCE CLAIM, SETTLE, WE'LL HAVE OUT WHOLE ROOF REPLACED, BUT IN THE MEANTIME WE ARE ADDRESSING THOSE AREAS.

UM, THE CHALLENGE FOR US SOMETIMES IS THE CO-INSTRUCTOR WILL, I WILL WRITE IT AND WE DON'T EXACTLY KNOW THE AREAS.

SO WHEN THE AREA AND WE FIND OUT THAT IT'S ANOTHER PICTURE.

SO, UM, ANYWAY, THIS IS ABOUT PEOPLE ABLE TO WALK WITH ME, UH, LAST WEEK, LIKE THE, YOU KNOW, WE IDENTIFY THE ACCESS SPACE THAT HE'S ASKING US TO REPAIR AND WE HAVE TO CONTRACT IT THERE TODAY AND IT'S ALL DONE.

SO HE CAN GO TOMORROW AND CHICKEN, BUT YES, YOU HAVE TO ADDRESS ALL OF THOSE THAT HOPEFULLY WE CAN CLOSE IT.

I ENDED UP THE WEEK, IT WAS THE BOSLEY WILL COME OUT AND INSPECT THEM.

SO, UM, SOME OF THOSE, UM, THE OTHER ONES THAT HE MENTIONED THAT AREA, UM, THAT PICTURE, HE SAID THAT IT BULGES AND MIGHT HAVE WHAT DAMAGE.

THERE ISN'T ANY WATER DAMAGE.

IT IS BULGING.

AND THAT'S BECAUSE IT, UM, THE, THE NAIL THAT WAS HOLDING THAT, THAT, UM, THAT CEILING, WHATEVER YOU CALL THAT, UM, IT JUST COMING OFF.

SO WE REINFORCED IT.

UM, AND THAT'S THE AFTER PICTURE AND THAT, THAT HOLE THAT HE IDENTIFIED THERE, UM, THERE WAS A HOLE, SOMEBODY ON TROUBLE, BUT WE REPLACED IT BY PUTTING A WOOD BOARD, AS YOU CAN SEE OVER THERE, UM, THE PLUMBING JIMMY PAGE.

AND WE RECOGNIZE THAT AGAIN, THAT MAKES THE FUNDS WERE SHORT.

WE HAD A QUOTE FOR IT OUT OF DEPENDENT.

UM, WE HOPE TO GET THE PAINTING AND THE BOOP COMPLETED ONCE ALL THAT SET UP.

BUT, UM, SO THAT'S IT.

I THINK THAT'S SUMMARIZED IT, ESPECIALLY THE SECOND.

YOU COMPLETED READING EVERYTHING.

AND SO THE RECOMMENDED ORDER IS TO LEAD ALL REPAIRS WITHIN TWENTY-FIVE DAYS, YOU ANTICIPATE BEING ABLE TO COMPLETE ALL THE POLICE.

THAT'S IN THIS, IN THIS LIST.

THREE COMPLETED ALREADY AS OF TODAY, JUST TO CLARIFY.

SO THERE'S NO REMAINING YOU STAYING IN THIS LIST IS THAT LIST YOU JUST PRESENTED OR THE LIST THAT THE CODE OFFICER PROVIDED.

SO ARE THERE ANY REMAINING VIOLATIONS OF THE CODE OFFICER SHOW TO YOU? OH, COOL.

WELL, SUE IS REALLY DILIGENT AND HE COMES A LOT AND HE IDENTIFIED YOU EACH TIME.

ONE OF THE TWO.

SO, SO AS FAR AS WE KNOW, WE CLOSED ALL THIS THAT IS HERE RIGHT HERE, THAT HE PUT, THEY ARE, THEY ARE A FEW MORE THAN HE HAD LISTED THAT WE CO WE HE'S GOING TO CLOSE NEXT WEEK FOR 2022.

UM, LIKE I SAID, WE CONTINUE TO WORK WITH HIM POST ALL THAT HE CAN IDENTIFY.

I WOULD LIKE TO RECOMMEND THOUGH, THAT WOULD BE VERY HELPFUL IF WE CAN GET PICTURES WHERE HE MEANT FOR US.

AND WE KEEP ASKING THAT, CAUSE IT'S VERY FAR TO, TO SAY THE REAR, YOU KNOW, UM, HE PRESENT THE PICTURES.

SO IT MEAN THAT WE'RE GETTING THESE PICTURES.

WE DIDN'T PICK THE WORD.

SO WE GO IN THERE, WHAT WE THINK IT'S SPIN ON DAMAGE.

AND IT'S THE OTHER SIDE.

SO IF WE HAVE PICTURES, THEY WERE REALLY HELPED US.

IT'S, YOU KNOW, GET THROUGH THIS PROCESS WHEN WE COME THERE, WHAT HE WANTS.

AND IF I MAY, A NUMBER OF OCCASIONS, ALWAYS REQUESTED HE'S DOING AN INSPECTION.

I WILL BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO WALK AROUND AND SEE WHAT HE'S SIGNALED OUT.

WE HAVE SEVEN BUILDINGS AND THERE WAS ALL SORTS OF THINGS HERE.

I'M UNABLE TO GET THEM TO DO THAT WITH ME.

DIFFICULT FOR US TO DO THE JOB.

THIS IS HE'S OUR THIRD COAT GUY FOR YEARS, AND NOTHING CAN SEE IN HERE CODE GUYS, BUT THEY ALL HAVE DIFFERENT OPINIONS ABOUT WHAT'S BAD.

WHAT'S GOOD.

AND WHAT'S ABOUT ALATION.

WHAT'S SCOTSMAN AND IT'S, IT'S A MOVING TARGET.

WE'D LOVE TO BE.

IT'S JUST BETTER COMMUNICATION CITATIONS.

WE ARE VERY DILIGENT IN GETTING IT FIXED ONCE WE KNOW EXACTLY THE PICTURE THAT WE NEED TO GET THIS.

NO, NO, THE PROPERTIES THAT PATIENT BEFORE, NO, IN, IN THE AUSTIN AREA.

SO ANYWAY, THAT'S, I GUESS THAT'S THE QUESTION ANSWERED.

THANK YOU, SIR.

BUT WE APPRECIATE HEARING YOUR SIDE THERE.

SOME OF US IS OUTSIDE THE GARBAGE PER VIEW AS THE SIBLEY, WE PRETTY MUCH CAN ONLY FOCUS ON

[01:45:01]

THE ORDER.

THAT'S FOR THE PROPOSED ORDERS THAT ARE IN FRONT OF US TO SEE ANYTHING AND THE VIOLATIONS THAT WE'VE JUST SEEN.

UM, BUT I DO THINK THAT THAT IS CERTAINLY SOMETHING THAT STAFF AND SUPERVISORS AND INSPECTORS COULD CERTAINLY CONTENTION.

AND I UNDERSTAND TOO, THAT THEY'RE, YOU KNOW, THEY'RE ON A DIFFERENT SCHEDULE.

THEY MIGHT BE CALLING YOU, THEY MIGHT BE MISSING YOU, WHATEVER.

BUT, UM, YEAH, THAT WOULD BE IDEAL AS REGULAR AND HAVING A PICTURE REALLY HELPS CAUSE KEEP, WE COULD FIX IN THE WRONG PLACE.

I, UM, I JUST WANTED TO CONFIRM THAT I UNDERSTAND CORRECTLY WHAT THE, UM, PROPERTY OWNER OR MANAGERS ARE SAYING THAT YOU DID ALL THE WORK AND YOU ALSO HAVE PERMITS FOR ALL THE WORK.

SO IN THAT CASE, IF WE ADOPTED THIS, UM, RECOMMENDATION, IT WOULD BE OKAY BECAUSE THERE'S, YOU KNOW, THE WORK WILL BE LONG DONE BEFORE THIS ORDER WOULD ACTUALLY HAVE ANY EFFECT ON YOU BECAUSE THE ORDER, THE ORDER IS SAYING, DO ALL THIS WORK AT ALL THE PERMITS WITHIN 45 DAYS.

AND ESSENTIALLY YOU'RE SAYING YOU THAT'S ALREADY HAPPENED.

THEY JUST NEED TO GO OUT AND INSPECT IT.

AND THEN, THEN THE CASE WOULD BE DONE.

SO IF WE WERE TO JUST ADOPT STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION, THAT WOULD WORK.

SO THE QUESTION OF, UM, IS IT THE CODE THAT NEEDS TO STAY CLOSE OR IS IT THE BUILDINGS? YEAH, IT'S NOT, IT'S NOT US THAT'S I THINK WHEN THEY GO OUT WILL CORRECT ME STAFF IF I'M WRONG, BUT I THINK THE CODE OFFICER HAS TO GO OUT AND INSPECT AND VERIFY THAT THE VIOLATIONS HAVE BEEN FIXED BEFORE IT CAN BE FINALIZED.

YES WE DO.

WE WELCOME THEM TO YOU ALL DOCUMENT AND TO, TO KIND OF CLARIFY OUR IDEAS, JUST TO SAY, OKAY, ARE THERE EITHER VIOLATIONS OR WERE THERE VIOLATIONS? AND IF SO, WE ARE, WE MIGHT ORDER THAT THEY ALL NEED TO BE REPAIRED WITH ONE FIVE DAYS, BUT IT WOULD BE UP TO THE CODE INSPECTORS ON THE OFFICIALS TO VERIFY THAT THE CLUSTER, UM, ARE THERE QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM THE COMMISSION? I JUST HAVE ONE CLARIFYING QUESTION.

OH, FUN.

THE RE-INSPECTION FOR THESE VIOLATIONS SAY THERE'S ANOTHER VIOLATION THAT MEANS DOWN, THAT WOULD BE OUTSIDE WITH THIS BORDER AND CORRECT.

WOULD NOT OCCURRENCE.

SO THE PROPERTY COULD STILL BE IN VIOLATION, BUT AS LONG AS IT'S NOT THESE VIOLATIONS, THE PENALTIES AGAINST ACTUALLY, AND THAT IS THERE'S VERY MUCH THE REASON WHY WE ACTUALLY SEE PHOTOGRAPHS TONIGHT TO KNOW EXACTLY WHAT, SO THOSE THINGS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED THEN EVERYTHING'S THERE'S NUMBERS, CRUSH.

I THINK WE'RE, WE'RE CONDENSING THE REVERSE.

UH, I THINK THE WAY OF A HOMEOWNER COMING IN HERE TELLING US THAT, UH, THEY PICKED ALL THE VIOLATIONS.

THEY HAVE, UH, WORK ORDERS, UH, PERMITS.

UH, WE SHOULD GET IT REINSPECTED BEFORE WE DO ANY KIND OF ORDER.

WHY, WHY ISSUE AN ORDER IF, UH, THE INSPECTOR GOES IN CHECKS AND VERIFY THAT EVERYTHING WAS DONE.

SO I THINK WE SHOULD JUST USE THE, UH, UH, CODY PORSCHE TO AN OPPORTUNITY TO GO AND CHECK WHAT THE LADY IS SAYING IS TRUE.

UM, AND LIKE THIS OTHER GENTLEMAN, UH, COMMISSIONER SADIA THERE'S OTHER ADDITIONAL VIOLATIONS, OR THERE WOULD HAVE TO BE A WRITE-UP ON THAT.

UH, WE, WE WERE NOT, UH, TAKEN INTO A FELONY, UH, FISHER VIOLATIONS BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT BEFORE US RIGHT NOW.

UM, COMMISSIONER MILLER, UM, I'D LIKE TO MOVE THAT WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THEN I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE ADAPT ADOPT, UM, STAFFS ORDER.

AND THIS WOULD BE TO CLARIFY, THIS WOULD BE FOR ALL FOUR BASES.

[01:50:01]

UH, IF EVEN WITH THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED, YOU CAN ASK A SPECIFIC OFFICER.

I THINK SHE ALSO HAD SOMETHING REAL QUICK.

UM, OKAY.

CAN WE MODIFY THE ORDER TO NOT HAVE SUCH A HEFTY FINE BECAUSE I, YOU KNOW, I DON'T KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THE OUTCOME IS OR THE CODES HAVE BEEN, YOU KNOW, IT'S, I, I TRULY BELIEVE I HAVE EVERY 10 MINUTES TO CLOSE THEM, BUT, UH, I, YOU KNOW, I DON'T WANT TO BE IN A POSITION TO FIND, NOT KNOWING WHAT THE EXPECTATION OF THE CODE WOULD BE AND BE ABLE TO BRING IN THOSE FIGHTS, ESPECIALLY SUCH A HIGH FIGHT WHEN WE TRULY HAVE AN INTENTION AND YOU KNOW, WE'RE NOT SO I WOULD LIKE AT LEAST YOUR CONSIDERATION TO, UM, PROVIDE THAT OPPORTUNITY TO GO WITH THE FINES AND, AND OBVIOUSLY ALLOW THIS INSPECTED, BUT WE WILL DISCUSS THIS QUESTION.

AND I THINK, THANKS FOR COMING PREPARED, NUMBER ONE, FOR MAKING EFFORTS TO GET THESE THINGS DONE, I CAN HEAR YOU.

CAN YOU SAY THAT YOU'RE NOT VERY CLEAR ON WHAT WAS REQUIRED, BUT, UM, I THINK THAT'S SOMETHING THAT YOU CAN CERTAINLY COMMUNICATE WITH INSPECTORS ON TO MAKE SURE YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY ASKING OF YOU.

UH, AND THEN FOR TONIGHT, WHEN I LOOK AT YOU EXHIBITS THE VERY THOROUGH, THE REPORT FROM TOWN THAT'S REALLY, YOU USE IT SPECIFICALLY SAYS IN THERE, ON THE SUMMARY, WHENEVER THEY DID THE BOY THAT, UM, THAT'D BE PAIRS TO THE FOUNDATION WHERE, UM, SORT OF PATCH UP REPAIRS, THEY'RE NOT GEARED TO US LEVELING THE FOUNDATION.

NO, IT IS.

WELL, I MEAN, IF THEY'RE NOT FIXING THE WHOLE STATELESS STUFF.

SO THAT'S HOW THEY HAVE TO DO THE VALIDATION.

THEY'RE NOT LIKE I HAVE TO TEAR IT DOWN, THEY LIFT IT UP BY GETTING THOSE.

SO THERE'S AN EXPECTATION TO LEVEL THE FOUNDATION JUST BASED ON THE EVIDENCE THAT YOU BROUGHT OH YEAH.

I MEAN, I, YOU KNOW, OBVIOUSLY IF IT IS OUR OPINION THAT YOU CAN'T JUST USE A LEVEL OF TO SEE HOW LOW IT'S LIKE, MEAN, I THINK THE ENGINEER HAS TO SAY IT'S ADEQUATE.

RIGHT, RIGHT.

UM, THE OTHER QUESTION I HAVE WAS WHEN WAS THE LAST SET OF REPAIRS, WHEN WERE THE LAST SET OF REPAIRS DONE ON THE FOUNDATION? JUST OVERALL, ALL THE REPAIRS THAT YOU DID TO APPLY, JUST TO GIVE US A TIMEFRAME.

SO, WELL, WE WORKED ON 20, 22 AND CLOSE THOSE LAST WEEK, WORKED ON THESE ONCE, BE CLARIFIED.

WE MET TUESDAY ON WHICH ONE WAS T2 SAID, IT'S OUTSTANDING.

BECAUSE AGAIN, THEY, THE HEARING DOES NOT HAVE ANY DOCUMENTS OR EACH ONE WAS INVALID AND HE WALKED WITH A PROPERTY AND SHE TOLD ME, POINTING IT OUT, WHICH ONE WAS IDENTIFIED.

AND I CONFIRM A PICTURE.

AND THOSE ARE THE PICTURES THAT THOSE ARE ALREADY FIXED IN YOUR OWN TRICKS.

SO I THINK WHAT THE OTHER COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER MILLER WAS SAYING IS IT WOULDN'T BE UP NO EFFECT, REALLY, IF EVERYTHING'S ALREADY IN COMPLIANCE AND WHAT ARE WE TALKING ABOUT? SO THIS ASSUMPTION ON THE FLOOR, THERE IS A MOTION ON THE FLOOR.

WHICH IS TO ADOPT STEPS RECOMMENDED.

SO IT'S TRICKY WITH THAT.

IDEALLY KEEP IT SECOND AND THEN DISCUSS IT, MODIFY IT AND CHOOSE.

UM, OR WE CAN LET IT DIE.

ALSO A GOOD DESCRIPTION.

HOPEFULLY NONE OF THEM WOULD BE ACCRUING, BUT THAT IS, THAT IS WHERE THEY'RE CATCHING THAT $16,000.

SO THESE ARE VERY STEEP.

I WOULD AGREE THAT'S A THOUSAND DOLLARS PEAK PERFECT CASE IT'S THAT WEEK, BUT OF COURSE THE CASES MIGHT BE CLOSED DOWN.

IT MIGHT NOT ALL BE REALLY,

[01:55:02]

AND I'M SORRY, THIS PROPERTY IS JUST NOT THAT CHEAP.

SO, UM, I WOULD CERTAINLY BE A LITTLE MORE COMFORTABLE WOULD WORK TO REDUCE THE FINE AMOUNT.

THAT WOULD IT BE IF WE JUST POSTPONE THIS FOR 30 DAYS UNTIL WE GOT IT OFF? SO PERHAPS, OH, I DON'T MIND.

UM, IT DOESN'T, THERE CERTAINLY THERE ARE CERTAINLY APPROPRIATE TYPES TO CONTINUE A CASE.

I, I THINK THAT I'M NOT SURE WHAT MORE WE WILL DO IN 30 DAYS.

WE SEE PROPERTY REPRESENTATIVES WHO APPEAR TO BE VERY DILIGENTLY GOING AFTER THIS CONCERN RIGHT NOW IS MAYBE JUST NOT KNOWING WHICH THINGS TO ATTACK FIRST.

I'M HOPEFUL THAT WITHIN 45 DAYS THEY COULD GET THAT INFORMATION.

OH, PROMPT SUPERVISOR ADAMS, OR FROM SPECTER AND KNOCK THIS OUT.

THAT'S FINE.

IT'S TOUGH BECAUSE IT'S A BUT REPEAT SITUATION.

UM, SO I WENT TO MAKE A FRIEND AND MENTOR THAT MOTION, UH, THAT WE DO ADOPT THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF STAFF, UM, WITH A SLIGHT AMENDMENT THAT THE WATER IS $1,000 OVERALL.

SO THAT'S 200 AND YOU KEEP PACE, UM, PER WEEK, WHICH IS STILL A LOT.

SO WE COULD JUST, IF I COULD, I'M JUST THINKING OUT LOUD, IF I COULD SAY TWO 50, UM, PER MONTH PER CASE, THAT WOULD BE, WOULD BE VERY DRASTIC REDUCTION.

THAT WOULD BE FAR MORE THAN THAT ALREADY.

OH, YOU MEAN THE OWNERS THAT ONLY APPLIES FOR SINGLE, NOT A SINGLE STRUCTURE, SO YEAH.

SO, UM, WELL, YEAH, THAT'S A DRASTIC REDUCTION.

I DO SEE SOME EFFORT.

UM, AND I WANT TO SAY THIS IS MITIGATED, MITIGATED BY THE FACT THAT THERE MIGHT'VE BEEN SOME MISUNDERSTANDINGS INITIALLY ON WHAT WHAT'S NEEDED.

SO, UM, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A FRIENDLY AMENDMENT.

I'M NOT SURE OF THE ABOUT, BUT THAT AMOUNT RIGHT NOW.

IT'S VERY, VERY, YES, I'LL SECOND YOUR MOTION.

IF YOU LAID OUT THE SPECIFICS AND WE ALREADY HAVE EMOTION EMOTION, AND THE SECOND THAT WE WOULD NEED TO MODIFY THAT.

SO THIS IS NOT A NEW ONE IF SHE'S OPEN TO IT.

WELL, SO LET ME MAKE SURE I UNDERSTAND PROMOTION IS TO REDUCE THE FINE FROM, UH, WACO PER MONTH.

UH, AND IT TOOK COMMERCIAL FINE.

SO, UM, WHAT I'M SAYING, IF SHE CAN, IF SHE CAN QUIT ON HER EMOTION, WHAT'S THE AMOUNT THAT SHE'S GOT IN MIND.

UH, THEN I THINK WE CAN MOVE ON.

SO RIGHT NOW WE HAVE EMOTION FROM COMMISSIONER MIDDLE BAY, WHICH WAS TO ADOPT STAFF'S RECOMMENDED ORDER AS IS, WHICH WOULD RESULT IN POTENTIALLY UP TO $16,000 PER BOX.

AND THAT HAS BEEN SECONDED.

SO UNTIL WE DEAL WITH THAT MOTION, I DON'T BELIEVE WE CAN INTRODUCE A NEW ELECTION.

SO AMENDMENT RIGHT.

I GET TO TALK TO THAT BECAUSE I MADE THE ORIGINAL MOTION.

SO I, I DIDN'T REALLY, WHEN I WAS MAKING THE MOTION, I THINK I WAS THINKING IT WAS A THOUSAND DOLLARS PER WEEK OVERALL RATHER THAN FOR FOUR TIMES FOUR, WHICH I GUESS IS WHAT IT WOULD BE.

BUT I'M A LITTLE CONFUSED BECAUSE THE OWNERS HAVE JUST REPRESENTED TO US THAT EVERYTHING IS FIXED.

SO IN THAT CASE, FINES WOULD NOT BE AN ISSUE.

NOW THERE'S ALL THIS CONCERN ABOUT FINES.

UM, IF EVERYTHING AND, AND WHAT I'M UNDERSTANDING IS IF EVERYTHING ISN'T FIXED IT'S BECAUSE THERE MAY BE A MISCOMMUNICATION ABOUT EXACTLY WHAT NEEDS TO BE FIXED, BUT IT STILL SEEMS LIKE IT COULD BE FIXED WITHIN 45 DAYS.

AND THIS IS A REPEAT OFFENDER PROPERTY.

THESE DON'T COME TO US UNTIL THERE'S BEEN A SIGNIFICANT EFFORT TO GAIN COMPLIANCE.

SO I, I DON'T REALLY WANT TO GO IN THE EXTREME DIRECTION IN TERMS OF LOWERING THE PINES.

I'D RATHER GO TO A THOUSAND DOLLARS OVERALL RATHER

[02:00:01]

THAN PER CASE.

UM, SO THERE'S STILL SOME INCENTIVE TO DEAL WITH.

WHATEVER'S OUTSTANDING.

AND, AND IF, IF IT SOUNDS WHAT IT SOUNDS LIKE, AND WHAT WE SAW IN THE PHOTOGRAPHS SEEMS LIKE, YOU KNOW, IT'S, IT'S PROBABLY BEEN DEALT WITH AND IF NOT, SO THAT MEANS YOU ARE REMINDER YOUR MOTION IN A VISUAL, I'LL SAY, CAN YOU MOTION? I SECOND AMENDMENT WAIT.

SO ARE YOU SAYING IF WE WENT WITH A THOUSAND DOLLARS OVERALL, PER WEEK, RATHER THAN PER CASE, YOU WOULD SECOND THAT, OKAY.

THAT'S OKAY WITH ME COMMISSIONER MILLER, I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT WE DROP IT TO TWO 50 PER CASE JUST BECAUSE SOME OF THESE CASES MIGHT BE COMPLETED.

THAT'S TRUE.

SO THEN IT WOULD BE A THOUSAND OVERALL, BUT IF THE, IF SOME OF THEM ARE RESOLVED.

I THINK THAT'S A GOOD IDEA.

I WOULD ACCEPT THAT AMENDMENT.

THIS IS COURIER .

SO THE COMMISSIONER MILLER MADE THE ORIGINAL.

AND THEN WE RECEIVED, UM, A SECOND ONE, THEN WE USE A FRIENDLY AMENDMENT TO THE FRIENDLY.

SO LET'S REDO THE SECOND SINCE IT'S BEEN AMENDED.

UM, AND THEN I THINK NOW , IT'S THE RIGHT TO ACCEPT OR DENY THE FRIENDLY AMENDMENT, BUT, UM, WHOEVER MADE THE ORIGINAL SECOND, UM, SURE.

FRANCIS, YOU CAN REDO EITHER YOUR SECOND, IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO, TO ACCEPT THE MODIFICATION CATHOLICS, YOU STILL WANT TO SECOND THE MOTION.

SO UNLESS THERE'S FURTHER DISCUSSION, SO I'LL PICK HER UP.

SO, UM, WHEN DID THIS GO INTO A REPEAT OFFENDER PROGRAM? IT'S A PROFESSOR AT 19, 19.

NO, SORRY.

WE WERE JUST WONDERING WHEN IT WENT INTO REPEAT, SORRY.

KEEP IN MIND.

THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED DOWN.

WE'RE LOOKING AT, OKAY.

SOUNDS LIKE I WILL CALL THE QUESTION.

I WILL DO THIS VIA BULL CALL AND WHAT WE'RE THE MOTION IS TO ADOPT STAFF'S RECOMMENDED ORDER, BUT TO MODIFY IT SO THAT ALL REPAIRS ARE COMPLETED WITHIN 45 DAYS, UH, ON THE 46 STATE, THE FINE PER CASE WOULD BE $250 PER WEEK.

AND SO IT'S THE SAME FOR ALL FOUR CASES.

COMMISSIONER THOMPSON.

ARE YOU OKAY FOR NEGATIVE? OKAY.

COMMISSIONER FOR A COUPLE OF DAYS.

MY PARENTS HAD SOME LABOR COMMISSIONER.

COMMISSIONER YES.

COMMISSIONER VICE CHAIR.

I'D BE LIKE OVER YOU IN FAVOR.

AND COMMISSIONER MILLER.

ARE YOU AT PAPER? YES.

SO, SO SEVEN TO SEVEN.

A PAPER.

MOTION PASSED.

SO A COPY OF THE ORDER WILL BE MAILED TO YOU.

TAKE A FEW DAYS TO GET IT MAILED OUT TO YOU.

THEN YOU'LL HAVE 45 DAYS WITH THE DAY THAT IT IS ABLE TO YES.

PLEASE GET WITH PFIZER AND ADAMS AND YOUR PERSPECTIVES, THAT SITES.

AND YES, WE WOULD LOVE FOR THERE TO BE CLARITY BETWEEN SECTORS OF APART.

AGAIN, IT'S NOT SOMETHING WE CAN ADDRESS RIGHT HERE, BUT WE HEAR YOU.

AND I KNOW THAT COAT'S NOT HERE.

SHE TOO.

THAT'S CUTE.

ANY PERMITS HAVE TO BE CLOSED, MUCH OF THAT HAPPENS FIRST AND THAT IT'S INSPECTED BY THE CITY.

SO CAN I ASK A QUESTION? SO IT WAS THAT SAID IT'S CLOSED TO BE YOU HAVE ANY PERMITS THAT NEED PIZZA POST AND THEN THE CODE OFFICER, WHICH WOULD HAVE TO COME OUT AND CONFIRM THAT EVERYTHING IT'S, ALL THE CARPETS WERE CLOSED, EVERYTHING WAS IN COMPLIANCE, THEN THEY WOULD CLOSE THE CASE.

AND IF, AND THEN IT WOULD, THAT WOULD STOP ANY PENALTIES IF THEY COULD BREWED OR STOP THE CASE.

SO MAKING SURE THAT WE SPEAK TO ABOUT THE, IF

[02:05:01]

AND THEN ALSO BY THE CODE OFFICERS.

IS THAT CORRECT? OKAY, GOOD TO COME BACK FROM, RIGHT.