Link

Social

Embed

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[00:00:05]

SO WE ARE GOING TO GET UNDERWAY.

[Call to Order]

UH, MY NAME IS COMMISSIONER KING AND I'M GOING TO BE FILLING IN AS THE CHAIR TONIGHT FOR TONIGHT'S MEETING.

SO APPRECIATE, UH, STAFF'S HELP AND EVERYBODY BEING HERE TONIGHT.

AND SO WE HAVE, I JUST WANT TO SAY RIGHT UP FRONT, WE HAVE SIX ZONING AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE TONIGHT, THREE VIRTUALLY AND THREE HERE ON SITE.

AND I JUST HAVE A CONCERN ABOUT TAKING ACTION ON ITEMS WITH JUST SIX MEMBERS.

SO WHAT WE ARE THINKING ABOUT DOING IS DOING THE CONSENT AGENDA FIRST, GETTING THROUGH THAT, AND THEN RECESSING UNTIL WE GET AT LEAST ONE MORE MEMBER HERE SO WE CAN HAVE SEVEN MEMBERS.

SO DOES THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY CONCERNS ABOUT THAT? OKAY, COMMISSIONER, LET'S SEE.

YEAH.

CAN WE START GREENBERG YOUR HAND FIRST, NOT CONCERNED ABOUT YOUR SUGGESTION.

I AM CONCERNED ABOUT ONLY HAVING SIX MEMBERS AND THAT MAYBE IF WE HAVE DISCUSSION CASES, WE SHOULD POSTPONE THEM.

BUT I SIT IN THAT.

WE DO HAVE ONE MORE NOW.

YES.

NOW WE HAVE SEVEN.

OH YES.

OKAY, GREAT.

UH, CHAIR BARRERA, RAMIREZ.

SURE.

WE HAVE SEVEN.

AND THEN I, UH, GOT AN EMAIL FROM, EXCUSE ME, COMMISSIONER.

UM, I'M LIKING ON HIS NAME KOSTAS.

THAT WILL BE JOINING US LATER.

AND I, UNFORTUNATELY I AM DOUBLE-DIPPING TONIGHT, SO I AM PRESENTING AT THE BICYCLE ADVISORY COUNCIL.

WE CAN HEAR YOU.

OKAY.

YEAH.

COMMISSIONER DINKLER I THINK WE CAN HEAR YOU.

SO, UH, OKAY.

SO, UH, NOW WE DO HAVE, WE HAVE AT LEAST SEVEN MEMBERS NOW AND WE WILL HAVE ANOTHER ONE JOINING US PROBABLY RIGHT WHEN WE GET THROUGH WITH THE CONSENT.

SO WE'RE GOING TO CONTINUE ON, WE'RE JUST GOING TO CONTINUE ON WITH THE MEETING AS USUAL.

SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

OKAY.

SO THE FIRST SORT OF BUSINESS, DO WE HAVE ANY CITIZEN COMMUNICATION, ANY PUBLIC COMMUNICATION, ANY SPEAKERS FOR PUBLIC COMMUNICATION, THE COMMISSION LIAISON AND VERNO.

WE DO NOT HAVE ANY REGISTERED PUBLIC COMMUNICATES.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

AND THE NEXT ITEM ARE THE

[Consent Agenda]

MINUTES FROM OUR MAY SET.

UH, LET'S SEE.

MAY THE THIRD MEETING MAY THE THIRD, 2022.

ANY, ANY CORRECTIONS OR CHANGES TO THE MINUTES? OKAY.

I, I THERE'S ITEM B TOO.

SHOULD INCLUDE A CEO TO PROHIBIT SHORT-TERM RENTALS.

THAT WAS PART OF THE CONSENT AGENDA ON ITEM B TWO ON THE MINUTES.

SO CAN WE ADD AND AMEND THE NOTED? THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

ALL RIGHT.

ANY OTHER CORRECTIONS OR CHANGES? OKAY.

HEARING NONE.

UH, THAT WILL BE ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.

OKAY.

OUR FIRST ITEM ON THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE, IS ITEM B ONE C 14 20 21 0 0 0 3 SOUTH LAKELINE, RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE APPLICATION APPLICANT POSTPONEMENT TO JUNE THE SEVENTH.

THE NEXT ITEM ON THE CONSENT AGENDA IS B TWO ITEMS C 14 20 22 0 0 B 0 0 4 1 ALISA ZONING DISTRICT SICK SIX STAFF POSTPONEMENT TO JUNE 7TH, ITEM B FIVE C EIGHT 14 2009 0 1 3 9 0.03 BULL CREEK PUT AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE, DISTRICT 10 STAFF POSTPONEMENT TILL JUNE 21ST ITEM B EIGHT, ENVIRONMENTAL VARIANCE S P 20 20 0 4 0 7 D DOLPHIN INDUSTRIAL STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OUTLINED IN THE ENVIRONMENT, ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ITEM B NINE C EIGHT, J 2019 DASH 0 1 8 6, PREMIER LOGIC LOGISTICS PARK PRELIMINARY PLAN STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE.

AND THEN ITEM B 10, C H J 20 22 0 0 3 0 EAST VILLAGE.

RIDING TRACK PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PLAN.

THIS ITEM IS ON CONSENT, BUT WHAT I WANT TO DO IS POINT OUT THAT THERE IS NO MASTER COMMENT REPORT FOR THIS ITEM.

AND I JUST WANTED TO ASK STAFF ABOUT THAT AND, UH, SEE ABOUT WHETHER THIS ITEM HAS BEEN APPROVED BY DEFAULT BECAUSE OF THE SHOT CLOCK IN HB 31 67.

SO CAN STAFF COUNTY STAFF, UH, ADDRESS THAT OKAY.

AND I THINK THE STAFF IS JOSE ARRIAGA.

AM I SAYING THAT CORRECTLY? SORRY.

HOPE

[00:05:01]

I DIDN'T MESS UP YOUR NAME.

CHAIR, COMMISSIONER LAYS ON RIVERA.

IT LOOKS LIKE HE'S OFF.

UM, HE'S AWAY FROM HIS DESK.

OKAY.

SO WE'RE GOING TO LEAVE THAT ON CONSENT, BUT I DID WANT IT NOTED THAT, UH, WHAT WE USUALLY SEE IS A MASTER COMMENT REPORT THAT HELPS INFORM THE COMMISSION ABOUT THE QUESTIONS THAT WERE ASSOCIATED WITH THESE, UH, PLANS.

AND ALSO, UH, THAT, UH, YOU KNOW, AS I UNDERSTAND, THIS HAS BEEN APPROVED BY DEFAULT.

AND SO, UH, UH, I'M NOT SURE ABOUT THAT.

THAT'S WHAT, UH, MY UNDERSTANDING IS.

DOES ANYBODY IN STEP ONE ADDRESS THAT CHAIR COMMISSION AND LAYS ON ENVERA? SO, UM, THE ITEM IS, UM, RECOMMENDED WITHOUT ANY CONDITIONS AND THE, UM, ALL THE COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.

UM, SO THEREFORE IT'S BEEN RECOMMENDED APPROVAL, RIGHT.

UH, BUT THAT'S TO THE EXTENT OF THE INFORMATION I HAVE AT THIS TIME.

OKAY.

DOES ANYONE ELSE HAVE ANY COMMENTS, ANY OTHER STAFF? GOOD EVENING COMMISSION, STEVE HOPKINS WITH THE VELVET SERVICES? I SUPERVISE THE SUBDIVISION REVIEW GROUP, UM, THIS CASE, UM, THIS, I HAVE SOME QUESTIONS AS WELL.

UM, AND I WAS UNABLE TO GET AHOLD OF THE CASE MANAGER AND, UH, IT APPEARS THAT IT MAY HAVE BEEN APPROVED, UM, BY DEFAULT, UM, IN MARCH.

OKAY.

AND I, I HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO GET AN, A FIRM ANSWER ON THAT.

OKAY.

WELL, THANK YOU FOR THAT INFORMATION.

I JUST WANT THE PUBLIC TO BE AWARE OF THAT.

SO WE'RE GOING TO TAKE ACTION TO APPROVE IT TONIGHT, AND, BUT IT MAY HAVE ALREADY BEEN APPROVED BY DEFAULT.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

I APPRECIATE YOU.

YES.

COMMISSIONER STERN.

YES.

UM, COMMISSIONER KING.

I JUST WANTED TO DOUBLE CHECK ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR.

I ALSO SEE B OH THREE, THE C4 TEEN HAS THAT BEEN PULLED OFF, PULLED THAT ONE AND I'LL GET TO THE DISCUSSION.

OKAY.

THANKS.

GOOD QUESTION.

THANK YOU.

YES.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONER GREENBERG.

UM, B ONE HAS BEEN POSTPONED.

THIS WOULD BE THE FOURTH POSTPONEMENT SINCE AFTER WE GAVE IT AN INDEFINITE POSTPONEMENT.

UM, I DON'T KNOW IF THE APPLICANT IS IN THE ROOM, BUT I JUST WONDER IF ONE MEETING IS SUFFICIENT OR IT SHOULD HAVE A LONGER POSTPONEMENT SO THAT IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE POSTPONED AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN SURE.

COMMISSION LIAISON AND VERY, YES, WE HAVE THE APPLICANT MS. VICTORIA.

HOTSY ON THE TELECONFERENCE, MS. HUSSEY, HE'LL SELECT STAR SIX, PROCEED WITH EMERGENCY.

HMM.

SO MY QUESTION IS, DO YOU WANT LONGER? UM, I THINK THE REALITY IS THAT WE ARE HOPEFUL THAT WE CAN COME BACK ON, UH, THE POSTPONEMENT THAT'S REQUESTED, BUT, UH, REALISTICALLY WE ARE VERY LIKELY TO NEED LONGER.

UM, SO TWO MEETINGS, INSTEAD OF ONE, IF IT IS THE WILL OF THE COMMISSION, WE CAN EXTEND THE POSTPONEMENT, UM, TO WHATEVER, WHATEVER DATE IS POSSIBLE BEYOND JUNE 7TH.

YEAH.

DID THE JUNE 21ST IS MY UNDERSTANDING ABOUT OUR NEXT OR OUR NEXT MEETING IN JUNE WOULD BE JUNE 21ST.

SO DO WE WANT TO POSTPONE THAT TO JUNE 21ST? OKAY.

I DON'T HEAR ANY OF THAT.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

I DON'T HEAR ANY OPPOSITION FROM THE COMMISSION ON THAT EITHER.

SO THOSE WELL THAT ONE WOULD BE POSTPONED TO DO JUNE 21ST, UH, WITH APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA.

OKAY.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS ABOUT THE CONSENT AGENDA? SHOULD I GO THROUGH IT ONE MORE TIME FOR THE COMMISSION? OKAY.

ITEMS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE THE MINUTES FROM MAY THE THIRD, 2022 AS AMENDED, UH, ITEM B ONE C 14 20 21 0 0 0 3.

POSTPONE TO JUNE 21ST BY THE APPLICANT ITEM B TO C 14 20 22 0 0 4 1 STAFF POSTPONEMENT TO JUNE 7TH, ITEM B FIVE C 18 2009 DASH 0 1 3 9 0.03.

STAFF POSTPONEMENT TILL JUNE 21ST, ITEM B A AN ENVIRONMENTAL VARIANCE S P 20 20 0 4 0 7 D DOLPHIN INDUSTRIAL STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OUTLINED IN ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION, RECOMMENDATION ITEM B NINE C H J 20 19 0 1 8 6 PREMIERE LOGISTICS PARK PRELIMINARY PLAN STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE ITEM B 10 C H J 20 22 0 0 3 0

[00:10:02]

EAST VILLAGE.

RIDING TRACK STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS IN EXHIBIT C.

OKAY.

ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE CONSENT AGENDA? YES.

COMMISSIONER GREENBERG.

CAN YOU JUST SAY THE NUMBERS ONLY? OKAY.

YES.

I CAN SAY IT'S ITEMS. ALL RIGHT.

ITEM A ONE ITEM B ONE, ITEM B TWO, ITEM B FIVE.

ITEM B, ITEM B NINE, AN ITEM B 10 AND COMMISSIONER BRINGER.

GREENBERG.

ARE YOU MAKING SOME NOTES THERE? THANK, THANK YOU FOR DOING THAT BECAUSE AS I CAN'T DO THAT AS IN MY ROLE TONIGHT, SO THANK YOU FOR DOING THAT.

OKAY.

SO, UH, IS THERE A MOTION ON THE CONSENT AGENDA? DID MR. GREENBERG MOVE TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS READ AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARINGS? UM, OKAY.

B ONE, B TWO, B FIVE, B A BENIGN AND B 10.

OKAY.

IS THERE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND COMMISSIONER KING.

OKAY.

MR. THOMPSON.

SECOND SET MOTION.

OKAY.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND.

OKAY.

COMMISSIONER DINKLER ARE YOU VOTING? OH, COMMISSIONER DINKLER.

WOULD, COULD YOU UNMUTE YOUR VOTING FOR THE CONSENT AGENDA? OKAY.

SO ON THE DIOCESE HERE, EVERYBODY IN FAVOR OF THE CONSENT AGENDA.

SO I'M SHOWING YOU NOW, THOMAS, UH, ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.

OKAY.

SO THE ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION ARE B3 ITEM C 14 20 22 0 0 1 4, SPRINKLED CUTOFF ROAD, REZONING ITEM B FOUR, C 14 20 21 0 1 9 4, EVELYN, CONTIGUOUS TO DISTRICT LINE AND THE SPEAKERS FOR ITEM BEFORE A STAFF WILL REACH OUT TO YOU 15 MINUTES BEFORE THAT ITEM COMES UP, BECAUSE ITEM B3 WAS ON CONSENT.

NOW IT'S GOING TO COME UP FIRST BEFORE ITEM BEFORE, SO YOU DON'T HAVE TO WAIT.

ONLINE.

STAFF WILL CALL YOU, CONTACT YOU WHEN IT'S TIME TO CALL IN TO SPEAK.

SO ITEM B SIX, C 14 20 21 0 1 4 1, UH, GABI ANNEX DISTRICT ONE, ITEM B SEVEN, C 14 20 22 DASH 0 0 20 21 0 3 WEST SLAUGHTER LANE, DISTRICT FIVE, AN ITEM B 11, C EIGHT S 77 DASH 1 36 VAC.

LARRY JAMISON SUBDIVISION PLAT VACATION IN THE ETJ STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE.

ALL RIGHT.

SO THE FIRST TIME WE'RE GOING TO DISCUSS IS ITEM

[B3. Zoning: C14-2022-0014 - Sprinkle Cutoff Rd Rezoning; District 1]

B3, C 14 20 22 0 0 1 4, SPRINKLE CUTOFF ROAD, REZONING.

GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS, HEATHER CHAFFIN WITH THE HOUSING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE C 14 20 22 0 0 1 4, SPRINKLED CUTOFF RESENT ZONING, UH, FROM INTERIM TWO AT 11,000 SPRINKLE CUTOFF ROAD.

IT'S A 16 AND A HALF ACRE SITE.

UH, STAFF IS SUPPORTING THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST.

UH, THERE WAS A REQUEST AT THE PREVIOUS HEARING ON MARCH 29TH TO POSTPONE TO THIS MEETING.

UM, I'LL JUST DO A REAL QUICK SUMMARY OF THE PROJECT.

IT'S THE PROPERTY IS ON THE EAST SIDE OF SPRINKLE CUTOFF ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET NORTH OF SAMSUNG BOULEVARD.

IT'S UNDEVELOPED AND HEAVILY VEGETATED PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH EAST AND SOUTH ARE PRIMARILY DEVELOPED WITH SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES AND ARE ZONED A COMBINATION OF INTERIM SF TWO AND PUD.

THE PIONEER CROSSING PUD ACROSS SPRINKLED CUTOFF ROAD TO THE WEST IS AN UNDEVELOPED PARCEL THAT IS OWNED SF SIX FURTHER WEST IS IRR AND UH, DEVELOPED WITH SINGLE FAMILY.

RESIDENTIAL STAFF SUPPORTS THE REQUEST.

THE PROPERTY ACROSS THE STREET TO THE WEST WAS REZONED FROM INTERIM RR TO SF SIX IN 2017.

AND, UH, THERE ARE OTHER PROPERTIES IN THE AREA WITH SINGLE FAMILY, RESIDENTIAL OF THE STANDARD LOT SIZE, UH, GRANTING SF SIX ON THIS TRACT REFLECTS EQUAL TREATMENT TO THE PROPERTY ACROSS THE ROAD.

AND IT ALSO INCREASES THE VARIETY OF VARIETY OF HOUSING TYPES AVAILABLE IN THE AREA.

AND I'M AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS.

I KNOW THE APPLICANT AND NEIGHBORHOOD REPRESENTATIVES ARE ALSO HERE.

THANK YOU.

NOW IT'S TIME FOR THE APPLICANT.

YES, WE'LL HEAR FROM MS. AMANDA BROWN.

MRS. BROWN.

YOU'LL HAVE SIX MINUTES.

GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS.

MY NAME'S AMANDA BROWN.

I'M WITH KIMLEY-HORN I'M THE APPLICANT FOR THIS REZONING REQUEST.

HOW DO I?

[00:15:01]

OKAY.

UM, AGAIN, UM, THE LOCATION IS AT 1100 SPIEGEL CUTOFF ROAD.

WE'RE HERE IN FRONT OF YOU TONIGHT WITH A REZONING REQUEST SLIDE, PLEASE.

THIS IS A LOCATION MAP.

UM, THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ALONG SPRINKLE CUTOFF ROAD.

NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.

THIS IS A ZONING MAP THAT OF THE CURRENT ZONING.

UH, THE TRACT OUTLINED IN RED IS, UH, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.

IT'S CURRENTLY INTERIM RURAL RESIDENTIAL, AND WE'RE PROPOSING, UM, TO REZONE IT TO SF SIX, UH, AS HEATHER ALREADY, UH, MENTIONED SF SIX ACROSS THE STREET AND THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES ARE ALL DEVELOPED AS, AS RESIDENTIAL HOMES.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

UH, I WANTED TO TALK A LITTLE BIT, I KNOW THAT THERE WAS SOME CONCERNS ABOUT, UM, TRENT TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC IN THIS AREA.

SO I WANTED TO TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT, UM, JUST WHAT, WHAT COMES WITH DEVELOPMENT.

THE CITY OF AUSTIN HAS, UM, EXISTING REQUIREMENTS THAT DEVELOPERS ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH, UM, TO, UM, HAVE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS COME WITH DEVELOPMENT.

UH, THE FIRST OF THOSE THAT I'LL TALK ABOUT IN A LITTLE BIT IS A NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC ANALYSIS.

THAT'LL TAKE PLACE AT THE TIME OF THE SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT.

UM, THE NEXT ONE IS THAT WE WILL BE CONTRIBUTING TO STREET IMPACT FEES.

THIS IS A RELATIVELY NEW, UM, REQUIREMENT OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN THAT WE WILL CERTAINLY BE SUBJECT TO.

AND THOSE WILL ALSO BE ASSESSED AT THE SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT STAGE.

UM, SPRINKLE CUTOFF ROAD IS SLATED FOR IMPROVEMENTS IN THE NEXT SEVERAL YEARS.

UM, ANY MORE DETAILS ON THAT WOULD PROBABLY BE A GOOD QUESTION FOR THE AUSTIN TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT.

UM, BUT, BUT WE WE'VE BEEN MADE AWARE THAT THAT IS, UM, IN, IN THE NEAR TERM PLANS.

ADDITIONALLY, WE EXPECT TO BE DEDICATING, UM, RIGHT OF WAY, UM, IN ORDER FOR THE FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS OF SPRINKLE CUTOFF ROAD, UH, WE EXPECT THAT TO BE, UH, PROBABLY FIVE TO 10 FEET.

UM, ADDITIONALLY THERE'S THE MOE CAN TRAIL, UM, THAT'S, UH, PLANNED TO THE EAST OF THE PROPERTY.

UH, SO WE EXPECT TO BE WORKING WITH THE PARKS DEPARTMENT, UM, FOR ANY SORT OF TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS OR CONNECTIVITY TO THAT TRAIL AS WELL.

NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.

SO A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC ANALYSIS.

UM, THIS ANALYSIS HAS BEEN DEFERRED TO THE TIME OF SITE PLAN.

THE CODE DOES SAY THAT IT CAN EITHER BE REQUIRED AT THE ZONING STAGE OR AT THE SITE PLAN STAGE, UM, OVER THE LAST SEVERAL YEARS.

UM, IT'S BEEN MY EXPERIENCE THAT STAFF HAS PREFERRED TO DEFER THESE STUDIES UNTIL THE TIME OF SITE PLAN, UM, FOR MULTIPLE REASONS.

THE FIRST BEING THAT AT THE TIME OF SITE PLAN, YOU UNDERSTAND A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT EXACTLY WHAT THE PROJECT IS GOING TO LOOK LIKE.

YOU KNOW, HOW MANY UNITS IT'S GOING TO BE, YOU KNOW, EXACTLY WHERE YOUR ACCESS POINTS ARE GOING TO BE.

SO YOU CAN REALLY HAVE MORE INFORMATION FOR A MUCH MORE MEANINGFUL ANALYSIS.

UM, THE NTA IS SOMETHING THAT, UH, IS REQUIRED TO BE DONE BY THE DIRECTOR, SO BY CITY OF AUSTIN STAFF.

SO WE EXPECT THAT TO BE, UM, TO BE ASSESSED AT THE SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

UM, THIS IS, I BELIEVE YOU'VE ALREADY SEEN THIS SLIDE.

WE ARE TRIGGERED, UM, COMPATIBILITY IS TRIGGERED ON THIS SITE, BOTH FROM THE SOUTH AND THE NORTH.

SO WE'LL BE COMPLYING WITH THAT AS WELL.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

UM, AND YOU KNOW, WE FEEL LIKE THIS IS A REALLY GOOD, UM, REZONING FOR THIS AREA, BOTH IN TERMS OF IT ALIGNING WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

I IMAGINE AUSTIN FOR PROVIDING MORE HOUSING AND DIVERSE HOUSING TYPES.

UM, ADDITIONALLY, UM, ALIGNS WITH MANY OF THE INITIATIVES OF THE COUNCIL FOR WANTING MORE HOUSING, UM, IN AUSTIN.

NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.

UH, THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.

I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.

UM, THE REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE DEVELOPERS HERE AS WELL FOR ANY QUESTIONS, UH, IF, IF THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU WHOLE, MR. JONATHAN SAYS BB SPEAKING OR NO.

OKAY.

SO NOW WE'LL HEAR FROM THE OPPOSITION MS. SAMMY EASTER DAY, MISS EASTER DAY, YOU'LL HAVE SIX MINUTES.

THANK YOU.

BUT BEFORE YOU TURN ON THE TIMER, UM, I'M NOT AN OPPOSITION OR FAVORING IT OR OPPOSING IT.

I'M NEUTRAL ON IT AT THIS POINT.

SO I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY THAT BEFORE YOU, YOU, YOU CAN'T SAY YOU'RE NEUTRAL, YOU HAVE TO BE FOR IT OR AGAINST IT.

AND I'M NEITHER.

SO THANK YOU FOR YOUR VOLUNTEER SERVICES, NOT ONLY AT THESE MEETINGS, BUT AT THE BEHIND THE SCENES WORK AND PREP YOU DO.

WE COME BEFORE YOU JUST SPEAK FOR THE SAFETY OF A SPRINKLE CUTOFF ROAD, THERE WILL BE OVER 1600 PEOPLE LIVING THERE WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT AND THE ONE RIGHT ACROSS THE ROAD FROM IT.

PLUS THE ONES THAT ARE ALREADY ON THE GROUND.

THE PROCESS IS SUPPOSED TO ENSURE SAFETY CURRENTLY DELIBERATELY FRAGMENTED SO THAT EACH APPROVAL LYNCH D ONLY APPROVES THEIR SMALL BIT WITHOUT REAL CLOUD JOEL THEY'D PICTURE PLANNING.

WE

[00:20:01]

WHO LIVE THERE MUST DEAL WITH ALL THE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES.

STAFF USES GOOGLE TYPE SOPHISTIC, COMPUTER MODELING, AND THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT.

BUT SOME OF IT'S OLD AND OUTDATED CONCLUSIONS DRAWN FROM THIS TYPE OF DATA MAY BE FLAWED.

FOR AN EXAMPLE, THEY PUT A TRAFFIC COUNTER ON THE ROAD FOR SUCH A RIDICULOUSLY SHORT PERIOD OF TIME THAT THE DATA THAT YOU MIGHT GET IS FLAWED.

THE PLAN TO BE DISCUSSED IS MOSTLY A DONE DEAL WITH A FEW MINOR DETAILS TO BE WORKED OUT WHILE THE CONDO DEVELOPMENT WILL MAKE PROFITS FOR THE DEVELOPER AND REAL ESTATE.

WE WHO LIVE NEXT TO IT MUST DEAL WITH THE FALLOUT.

WE DO NOT WISH TO STOP THE DEVELOPMENT, AND WE HAVE NO QUARREL WITH BUSINESSES MAKING A PROFIT, BUT THERE SOME ISSUES THAT MUST BE ADDRESSED BEFORE YOU MENTALLY TURN OFF.

WHAT I HAVE TO SAY.

SAFETY IS A BIG PART OF YOUR RESPONSIBILITY AND BANDING HOUSING UNITS.

YOU CAN ADD NEEDED SAFETY REQUIREMENTS TO THE APPROVAL PROCESS.

YOU ALREADY HAVE A PLATTED APPROVED CONDO DEVELOPMENT RIGHT ACROSS THE ROAD.

AND IT'S TWICE THE SIZE OF THIS ONE.

SPRINKLE CUTOFF IS AN OLD TWO LANE COUNTY ROAD WITH HILLS BLIND CURVES, MARGINALLY SAFE ROAD SERVICES, AND TWO BRIDGES.

THE ROAD RUNS SOUTHEAST AND NORTHWEST BETWEEN SPRINKLE ROAD AND PIONEER FARMS ROAD AND ENDS AT T INTERSECTIONS.

MOST OF IT WAS A NEXT BY BO AUSTIN OF THE LAST SIX YEARS.

UH, THE, ANY IMPROVEMENTS CURVED IN SIDEWALKS ARE PARALLEL TO THE NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.

AND I PRESUME THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL DO THE SAME, THE ONLY WAY IN AND OUT OF ALL YOUR APPROVED MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENTS, INCLUDING THIS ONE IS SPRINKLE CUTOFF MIDWAY BETWEEN THE TERMINUS IS SAMSON ROAD WITH AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL WITHIN WALKING DISTANCE OF THE INTERSECTION FOR UPPER GRADE CHILDREN.

THERE'S NO SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC SIGNALING ANYWHERE ON SPRINKLE CUTOFF.

I WAS TOLD BY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THAT MAYNOR ISD INDICATED TO A PREVIOUS BUILDER.

THEY DIDN'T HAVE TO DO ANYTHING TO THE INTERSECTION MITIGATION.

AND THAT WAS PRIOR TO ALL THIS CURRENT TRAFFIC LATE ROUTINELY EXCEEDS THE ONE POSTED 35 MILE AN HOUR SPEED SIGN.

IMAGINE YOU AND A CHILD TRYING TO CROSS THERE.

NOW YOU'RE ENABLING 134 MULTIFAMILY UNITS ADDED TO THIS ALREADY CONGESTED AND DANGEROUS ROAD IN AN EMERGENCY EVACUATION FOR FIRE HAZARDS.

THIS IS A FORESTED AREA OR ANOTHER ENVIRONMENTAL DISASTERS BECAUSE THE SAMSUNG PLANT IS PRETTY CLOSE.

EVACUATION ROUTES ARE LIMITED TO THIS ROAD FOR OVER 1600 PEOPLE.

THERE ARE ESTABLISHED RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES ALONG SAMSUNG THAT WOULD BE USED A LOT IN SAMSUNG OUT OF THE AREA.

SIGNALING TRAFFIC WIDE SHOULD BEGIN AT BREAKER AND PIONEER FARMS ROAD.

THERE'S A HUGE CONDO DEVELOPMENT RIGHT THERE ON THE NORTH SIDE AND CARS ALREADY LINE UP TO TRY TO GET ON BREAKER, WHICH IS GOING TO BE EXPANDED TO SAMSUNG IN THE NEXT SEVERAL YEARS WHEN PIONEER FARMS HAS AN EVENT, VEHICLES ARE PARKED EVERYWHERE.

THERE'S EMPTY GROUND OR CURVED SIDE.

ANOTHER SIGNAL AT SAMSUNG AND SPRINKLE CUTOFF SHOULD BE REQUIRED.

PART OF ANY PROPOSED PLAN COMPLETED WITHIN A REASONABLE TIMEFRAME AND NOT YEARS FROM NOW BETTER TRAFFIC MITIGATION IS NECESSARY.

IT'S SPRINKLE CUTOFF AND SPRINKLE ROAD.

SPRINKLE ROAD HAS A BLIND FIVE WAY INTERSECTION, NOT FAR SIDEWALKS THAT GO NOWHERE ARE BASICALLY USELESS.

THEY'LL THERE'S PUT SIDEWALKS ON THEIR DEVELOPMENT PER CURRENT CODE.

THERE SHOULD BE CHANGED OR THE CITY SHOULD PLAN TO BUILD ADDITIONAL SIDEWALKS TO CONTINUE FOR OUR CONTINUOUS PATHWAY.

CURRENTLY THE PEDESTRIANS, WHEN THEY COME TO THE END OF THE SIDEWALK, GET ON THE ROADWAY.

THERE WAS EVEN A LADY PUSHING A PRAM AND I WAS DRIVING.

SO I PUT MY CAR FLASHER LIGHTS ON AND FOLLOWED HER SO THAT AT LEAST I'D GET RAMMED INTO.

AND SHE AND THE BABY WOULDN'T AUSTIN AND X, THIS AREA AUSTIN WANTS TO SUPPORT DENSE DEVELOPMENT IN THIS AREA.

AUSTIN NEEDS TO REQUIRE THE SAME SAFETY FEATURES REQUIRED AND DENSELY POPULATED ELSE AREAS ELSEWHERE IN THE CITY.

OUR NEIGHBORHOODS SAFETY AS IMPORTANT AS ANY OTHER IN AUSTIN, YOU'RE COMMISSIONED TO PROVE THIS DEVELOPMENT IN THE MULTIFAMILY HOUSING DIRECTLY ACROSS THE ROAD.

YOUR COMMISSION HAS THE POWER TO ENSURE THAT NO BABY CHILD OR ADULT IS KILLED REMAIN BECAUSE OF POLICIES THAT IGNORED, SHARED RESPONSIBILITY OF DEVELOPER AND CITY TO PROVIDE SAFETY AND CURRENT FOR THE CURRENT AND FUTURE RESIDENTS OF THIS AREA.

[00:25:01]

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH, CHERYL.

AND I'LL HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT FOR THREE MINUTES.

LITTLE, THANK YOU, MISS EASTER DAY.

I APPRECIATE IT.

SURE.

THE APPLICANT WILL FOREGO THE THREE MINUTE REBUTTAL.

THAT'S THE, UH, YES, YES, YES.

FOR THE THREE MINUTE REBUTTAL FROM THE APPLICANT, THE APPLICANT WILL FOREGO THE REBUTTAL.

OH, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

OKAY.

SO NOW IT'S, UH, BACK TO THE COMMISSION.

UH, ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FROM COMMISSIONERS ABOUT THIS CASE? SURE.

CAN WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING? YES.

A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING COMMISSIONER DANGLER, UM, BECAUSE THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND THEN I HAVE A QUESTION FOR MR. GOLDEN.

OKAY.

IS THERE A SECOND TO CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING? I CAN SECOND THAT THIS IS NADIA.

OKAY.

OKAY.

UH, IT'S MR. GOLDEN AVAILABLE OUR TRAP.

OKAY.

YES.

HANG ON A SECOND.

WE GOT A VOTE.

NO WORRIES.

HANG ON.

OKAY, SO WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC, HEARING ALL THOSE IN FAVOR.

RAISE YOUR HAND.

OKAY.

AND IT'S UNANIMOUS.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

UM, MR. GOLDEN, CAN YOU TELL US WHEN THIS ROAD IS PLANNED FOR IMPROVEMENT? I MEAN, A DAD, UH, UH, IT SOUNDS LIKE IT'S ON THE FIVE-YEAR CIP, BUT PERHAPS SHE COULD ENLIGHTEN US.

I'M FAMILIAR WITH THIS ROAD AND THERE ARE CURVES AND IT IS PACKED WHEN PIONEER FARM AS AN EVENT.

UM, I HAVE TO ADMIT, I'M CONCERNED ABOUT THE ROAD AND WE HAVE HAD IN TAS AS PART OF THE ZONING.

SO MY SENSE IS A NEW PRACTICE CODE ALLOWS THE EITHER OPTION I'LL RESPECT THAT.

BUT I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHEN THE ROAD IS PLANNED FOR IMPROVEMENT, OF COURSE, BRIAN GOLDMAN, AUSTIN TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT.

WE DON'T HAVE A SPECIFIC DATE YET FOR THAT PROJECT.

WE'RE STILL COLLECTING FUNDING FOR THE ROADWAY, BUT IT'S ANTICIPATED THAT IT WILL BE WITHIN THE NEXT FIVE TO SEVEN YEARS.

UM, THAT MAY BE EXPEDITED IF THERE IS MORE DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA, WHICH WILL CONTINUE TO FUND ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS.

THIS IS SERVICE THE AREA D SO THAT'S, THAT'S OUR BEST ESTIMATE.

AND RIGHT NOW, SO IT'S, UH, IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE MADE BY TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES RATHER THAN CIP ARE.

OR ARE YOU SAYING IT'S ON THE LONG-TERM CIP PLAN? SO THE PROGRAMS WILL BE FUNDED BY THE NEW STREET IMPACT FEE.

GOTCHA.

OKAY.

ALL YOUR DEVELOPMENTS WILL HAVE TO PAY INTO, UM, AND THEN THERE ARE AL ALLOCATED TO SPECIFIC, UH, SERVICE AREAS WITHIN THE CITY.

SO IT IS THAT THEY ARE PAYING THEIR SHARE TOWARDS AN IMPROVEMENT THAT, UH, SERVES THAT DEVELOPMENT IN THAT COMMUNITY.

THANK YOU.

ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION? UH, ONE MORE FOR THE APPLICANT.

UM, MS. BROWN.

YES.

MA'AM, UH, I APPRECIATE YOUR ASSISTANCE WITH THIS AND GETTING THE TRAFFIC COUNTS, WHICH I KNOW, UM, YOU DID ON THE APPROPRIATE DATES AND BEFORE SCHOOL.

SO THE DATA IS THERE AVAILABLE FOR SITE PLAN, UH, APPRECIATE YOUR PATIENCE WITH, UH, GATHERING THE DATA SO WE CAN GIVE, UH, TRANSPORTATION THE BEST ANALYSIS POSSIBLE.

DO YOU ANTICIPATE THAT YOU WILL HAVE TO BUILD IN A TURN LANE INTO THE PROPERTY? IT WOULD PROBABLY EITHER BE, UM, A PORTION OF JUST WIDENING IT PERIOD, OR SOME SORT OF, UM, DIESEL LANE.

YES, THAT'S OUR EXPECTATION.

OKAY.

AND GO AHEAD.

I'M SORRY.

I WAS JUST GOING TO SAY, YOU KNOW, WE'RE, WE ARE ALL ALIGNED WITH THIS ISSUE AND WE, WE WANT TO BE GOOD PARTNERS WITH THE CITY OF AUSTIN.

UM, THIS IS GOOD FOR THE CITY, FOR THE NEIGHBORS AND FOR OUR DEVELOPMENT.

SO ANY WAY WE CAN HELP WITH, UM, IMPROVING THE TRACK, TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION IN THIS AREA WHERE ONBOARD AND THE, UH, SF SIX ACROSS THE STREET IS UNDEVELOPED, CORRECT? CORRECT.

OKAY.

UM, BY THE WAY, I APPRECIATE YOUR EFFORTS ON BEHALF OF ADDING TRAIL.

UM, AND, UM, NO, MS. RAMIREZ WILL BE NODDING WITH ME, UH, THAT YOU'RE ALWAYS BEEN SO AMENABLE ABOUT GETTING TRAILS, UH, CONNECTED.

THANK YOU.

[00:30:03]

OKAY.

ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION? ANY ON THE DYES? OKAY.

SO DO, DO WE HAVE A MOTION ON THIS CASE? AND WHILE WE'RE THINKING ABOUT THAT, YOU KNOW, I DO APPRECIATE THE POINT FROM THE SPEAKER TONIGHT ABOUT TRYING TO, UH, TRYING TO GET THE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE, SORT OF, YOU KNOW, IN ALIGNMENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT.

SO WE DON'T HAVE THESE, UH, YOU KNOW, CRUNCH POINTS AND SAFETY ISSUES AS WERE DESCRIBED EARLIER.

SO, YOU KNOW, I, I HOPE THE STREET IMPACT FEE WILL HELP US MAKE MORE PROGRESS IN THAT AREA.

AND MAYBE LATER ON, STAFF COULD GIVE US A PRESENTATION ON HOW THAT IMPACT FEE IS USED, BECAUSE MY, ONE OF THE THINGS I'M THINKING ABOUT IS SHOULD THE IMPACT FEE FROM THIS DEVELOPMENT BE PLOWED BACK INTO THIS SPRINKLE ROAD CUTOFF AND NOT USED IN ANOTHER PART OF THIS, UH, THE AREA WE CALL THEM SECTORS, I GUESS, OR WHATEVER THAT THE FEE COULD BE SPINNING.

SO I JUST, MAYBE STAFF COULD ADDRESS THAT.

I WOULD HOPE THAT THE STREET IMPACT FEES FROM THIS DEVELOPMENT WOULD BE TURNED BACK RIGHT BACK INTO SPRINKLE ROAD, A SPRINKLED CUTOFF ROAD HERE.

AND, UH, MAYBE WE CAN DO STAFF CAN GIVE US AN UPDATE ON THAT LATER ON AS A, AS A SEPARATE AGENDA ITEM.

THANK YOU.

OKAY.

IS THERE A MOTION ON THIS CASE? YES.

CHAIR BERRERA RAMIREZ.

I HAVE A QUICK COMMENT AND THEN I'LL MAKE THE MOTION.

I GUESS MY COMMENT IS THAT, YOU KNOW, THESE THINGS CONSTRUCTION OF AND DEVELOPMENT TAKE TIME TOO.

SO MAYBE IF WE'RE ON THAT FIVE-YEAR TRACK, MAYBE EVERYTHING WILL HAPPEN AT ONCE AND IT'LL BE BEAUTIFUL, BUT, UM, SO I WOULD MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION.

OKAY.

SECOND.

OKAY.

MOTION BY CHAIR, BARRERA RAMIREZ TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR SFCS SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER STERN.

IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION ABOUT THE MOTION? OKAY.

SEEING NONE, NO QUESTIONS.

OUR DISCUSSION ABOUT THE DEMOTION, THE MOTION, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION.

RAISE YOUR HAND.

AND IF I COULD MAKE ONE COMMENT, I THINK WHAT'S GOING TO HELP THIS FOR MS. EASTERLIES UNDERSTANDING IS THAT BLUE GOOSE CASE WHERE, UM, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE SOME BIG TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FEES, UH, BROUGHT INTO THE PICTURE.

SO WHILE I HAVE BEEN A LITTLE UNCOMFORTABLE ABOUT IT, UM, THE, THE INFORMATION FROM THE STAFF AND THE APPLICANT AND KNOWING WE'VE GOT MORE TRAFFIC IMPACT COMING, UH, I THINK I CAN SUPPORT IT.

OKAY.

SO, UH, I'M GOING TO, WE VOTED, SO I COUNTED.

AYE.

IT WAS UNANIMOUS.

SO THAT, THAT, THAT HAS BEEN APPROVED STAFF, UH, RECOMMENDATION SF SIX ON THIS ITEM HAS BEEN APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY.

THANK YOU.

OKAY.

SO THE NEXT ITEM IS ITEM

[B4. Zoning: C14-2021-0194 - Evelyn; Contiguous to District 1]

A, B FOUR.

AND DOES STAFF WANT TO LAY THAT ITEM OUT FOR US? GOOD EVENING.

UH, HEATHER CHAFFIN, HOUSING AND PLANNING.

THE NEXT CASE IS 20 21 0 1 9 4.

IT'S CALLED EVELYN.

IT IT'S CURRENTLY IN THE ETJ.

IT THERE'S AN ANNEXATION THAT'S BEING PROCESSED CONCURRENTLY, AND IT WILL BE IN DISTRICT ONE IF, AND WHEN IT IS ANNEXED CURRENTLY ON ZONED, THEY ARE REQUESTING S F FOUR A ON TRACT ONE AND C S M U ON TRACK TWO.

SO THE OVERALL ACREAGE IS ABOUT 195 ACRES TRACT.

ONE, THE S UH, SFR A REQUEST IS APPROXIMATELY 171 ACRES TRACK.

TWO IS APPROXIMATELY 23.5 ACRES STAFF, UH, SUPPORTS THE REQUEST FOR TRACK ONE TO BE SF FOUR A AND WE RECOMMEND G R M U FOR TRACK TWO.

AND THE APPLICANT IS AMENABLE TO THAT RECOMMENDATION.

UH, THE PART, THE MAIN PART OF THE REASON THAT THIS PROPERTY IS BEING ZONED INTO TWO TRACKS IS BECAUSE THERE IS A FEW, THERE IS A FUTURE EXTENSION OF BREAKER LANE THAT WILL PASS THROUGH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.

THERE'S A HAND-DRAWN EXHIBIT IT'S SHOWING, UH, THE BREAKER LANE EXTENSION.

SO IT'LL GIVE YOU AN IDEA, BUT IT'S NOT THE PRETTIEST THING I'VE EVER DRAWN, UH, PROPERTIES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BLUE GOOSE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY HALFWAY BETWEEN, BETWEEN CAMERON ROAD AND HARRIS BRANCH PARKWAY.

IT AGAIN ABOUT 195 ACRES.

THERE IS A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, AND THE REMAINDER IS, UH, AGRICULTURAL NORTH OF THE PROPERTY IS SOME END DEVELOPED LAND IN THE ETJ ALSO TO THE, ALSO TO THE NORTH.

AND THEN ALSO TO THE EAST IS THE HARRIS BRANCH PUD.

AND IT

[00:35:01]

HAS, UH, THE OVERALL PET HAS A MIX OF LAND USES, BUT THE AREAS NEAR THIS PROPERTY ARE, UH, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WITH SOME AMENITIES, A PUBLIC PARK, UM, SOME OTHER, UH, RECREATION FEATURES AND BLUEBONNET ELEMENTARY BLUEBONNET TRAIL ACROSS BLUE GOOSE ROAD TO THE SOUTH IS A LANDFILL WEST OF THE PROPERTY IS AN UNDEVELOPED TRACT IN THE ETJ, WHICH IS A SMALL, UH, PROPERTY.

AND THEN ALSO A LARGE TRACT THAT'S IN AUSTIN, FULL PURPOSE JURISDICTION.

THAT ONE IS INTERIM SF.

UH, IT'S MOSTLY UNDEVELOPED INCLUDES SOME SINGLE FAMILY, A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND RELATED STRUCTURES, UH, ALSO TO THE WEST IS SOME PROPERTY, UH, IN THE ETJ THAT INCLUDES, INCLUDES CONVENIENCE STORAGE USE.

THE PROPERTY IS PART OF A VOLUNTARY, FULL PURPOSE ANNEXATION, UH, BEING PROCESSED SEPARATELY.

AND, UH, IT'S SUBJECT TO, TO THE AREAS CURRENTLY SUBJECT TO TWO ADJACENT ACT ANNEXATION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS.

UH, THESE WERE BOTH APPROVED IN 2014.

THEY RESTRICT THE PROPERTY TO AGRICULTURAL AND RELATED USES UNTIL THE PROPERTIES ARE VOLUNTARILY ANNEXED AT THE DISCRETION OF CITY COUNCIL, OR IF THE AGREEMENTS EXPIRE, WHICH WOULD BE 15 YEARS FROM THAT DATE.

SO SINCE THIS IS A VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION, THE AGREEMENTS WILL BE TERMINATED AND THE PROPERTIES CAN BE DEVELOPED IN ACCORDANCE WITH WHATEVER ZONING IS ASSIGNED.

UH, I MENTIONED THE BREAKER LANE EXTENSION IT'S, UH, IN THIS GENERAL AREA IT'S, UH, CROSSING FROM, UH, KIND OF WHERE HARRIS BRANCH PARKWAY IS TO THE EAST AND HEADING TOWARDS SAMSUNG BOULEVARD AND CAMERON ROAD, UH, STAFF IS SUPPORTING THE SF FORAY, UH, ONTO THE LARGER TRACK TRACK ONE.

UH, THIS IS SIMILAR TO THE INTERIM TO THE WEST.

AND THEN ALSO THE HUD ZONING, WHICH IS, I GUESS, MOSTLY COMPARABLE TO SF THREE THAT IS TO THE NORTH AND EAST OF THE PROPERTY.

UH, THIS WILL, YOU KNOW, PROVIDE A VARIETY OF HOUSING TYPES IN THIS AREA.

UH, AS WE DISCUSSED ON THE PREVIOUS PROJECT, STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT CSM YOU ON TRACK TO YOU BECAUSE IT'S A MORE INTENSE ZONING CATEGORY THAN MOST OTHER THINGS IN THE AREA.

UH, WE BELIEVE THAT GRM IS APPROPRIATE FOR THAT TRACT, WHICH IS BORDERED ON THREE SIDES BY ARTERIALS.

UM, I AM AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS AND THAT IS MY PRESENTATION.

THANK YOU.

NOW WE'LL HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT.

THANK YOU, CHAIR.

WE'LL HEAR FROM MR. JEFFREY HOWARD, MR. HOWARD, YOU HAVE SIX MINUTES.

THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.

UH, GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS.

MY NAME IS JEFF HOWARD AND I REPRESENT THE APPLICANT IN THIS CASE.

UM, AND STATE NEXT LINE.

WHAT DID WE DO? WHICH ONE? WHAT DO WE HIT NEXT SLIDE.

OH, AND JUST THE NEXT LINE.

OKAY, GREAT.

THANK YOU.

UH, NEXT LINE.

SO THE TRACK IS APPROXIMATELY 195 ACRES, UM, LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST AREA OF, OF, UH, AUSTIN.

THEY'RE HIGHLIGHTED IN BLUE ON THE SCREEN TO THE EAST.

YOU HAVE A ONE 30 TO THE SOUTH.

YOU HAVE TWO 90 TO THE NORTH, YOU HAVE PARMER LANE AND UP IN THE CORNER TO THE VERY FAR LEFT, THE VERY UPPER LEFT CORNER, YOU CAN KIND OF MAKE OUT .

UM, THE THERE'S A HARRIS BRANCH PUD IMMEDIATELY TO THE EAST.

THERE'S ALSO THE PIONEER CROSSING PUD IN THE AREA, UH, IN THE MIDDLE, KIND OF AT THE TOP OF THE SCREEN, YOU CAN SEE SAMSUNG, UH, AND IN THE BOTTOM TOWARDS THE MIDDLE, YOU CAN SEE, UH, AMD.

AND SO, UH, THERE'S, THERE'S A LOT OF, UH, SCHOOLS, INFRASTRUCTURE EMPLOYMENT, UM, OUT HERE IT'S, UH, CURRENTLY AGRICULTURAL USE THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST, WHICH IS ZONE INTERIM SFA IS THE BREAKER VALLEY SUBDIVISION.

I THINK IT HAS A PRELIMINARY PLAN.

NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.

HERE'S THE ZONING, UM, THAT, UH, MS CHAFIN WAS REFERRING TO.

YOU CAN SEE IN THE AREA MP3 IN THE AREA, PUD ZONING, WHICH WOULD ALLOW SOME SMALLER LOTS, UH, IN HARRIS BRANCH, UH, AS WELL AS IN PIONEER CROSSING.

NEXT SLIDE.

HERE'S THE ASM P UM, SHOWING THE, THE BREAKER LANE COMING THROUGH, UH, THE, THE, THE BREAKER VALLEY PROPERTY TO THE WEST THAT'S IN OUR IS GOING TO BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE, UM, THAT, UH, BREAKER LANE EXTENSION THROUGH THEIR PROJECT.

AND THAT WILL PROVIDE A CONNECTION TO CAMERON ROAD, WHICH IS ON THE WEST SIDE OF THAT.

WE'LL BE PROVIDING, UH, BOTH DEDICATING THE RIGHT OF WAY AND FULLY CONSTRUCTING THE, UH, BREAKER LANE ARTERIAL THROUGH OUR PROPERTY.

UH, IN ADDITION, WE'LL BE, WE'LL BE PROVIDING PER OUR, UH, TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS THAT WE'RE WORKING THROUGH WITH THE CITY OR FINALIZING WITH THE CITY.

WE'LL HAVE SIGNALIZATION AND TURN LANES AS WELL TO MITIGATE TRAFFIC.

[00:40:01]

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

SO THE ZONING IS FOR SFA, I'M SORRY.

EXCUSE THE TYPO.

IT'S NOT A HUNDRED, 180 ACRES, 171 ACRES.

UM, AND WE THINK THIS IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ADJACENT BREAKER VALLEY SUBDIVISION AND THE PUDS IN THE AREA, UH, PROVIDES MUCH NEEDED HOUSING SUPPLY AT MORE ATTAINABLE MARKET RATE, UH, RATES.

UH, IT'S AN AREA WITH GOOD SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION, RETAIL INFRASTRUCTURE.

THE GRM USE ZONING WILL ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL COMMERCIAL SERVICES AND MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT IN THIS AREA ALONG MAJOR ARTERIAL.

UH, WHAT I WOULD NOTE HERE IS YOU CAN SEE FROM THE DRAWING W THE SINGLE FAMILY REMAINS ADJACENT TO THE, UM, UH, UH, HARRIS BRANCH, SINGLE FAMILY TO THE EAST, SO THAT WILL PROVIDE COMPATIBLE USES.

WE DON'T HAVE ANY COMMERCIAL UP AGAINST THOSE HARRIS BRANCH.

UM, UM, LOTS NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.

UH, AS MISS JEFF HAD MENTIONED, THIS IS A VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION CASE, AND, YOU KNOW, CURRENTLY THE LAW IN TEXAS IS THAT THERE IS NO INVOLUNTARY ANNEXATION ALLOWED ANYMORE.

UM, AND SO WE DON'T HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY IN AUSTIN TO EXPAND OUR TAX BASE INTO THE ETJ BY ANNEXATION OR TO EXTEND IN CITY RULES.

AND SO WITH THIS ANNEXATION CASE, WE'LL BE ABLE TO EXPAND THE TAX BASE, AND WE'LL ALSO BE ABLE TO APPLY IN CITY RULES TO THE AREAS SUCH AS BUILDING CODES, ZONING REGULATIONS, LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS, ET CETERA, UM, THE CONSTRUCTION OF BREAKER LANE.

UH, THIS IS A VERY, VERY IMPORTANT INFRASTRUCTURE.

I'VE HAD NUMEROUS PROJECTS WITH CITY STAFF THAT, UH, ARE LOOKING TO, UH, COMPLETE BREAKER LANE THROUGH THIS AREA.

UH, AND THIS WILL HELP FILL THE GAP BETWEEN THE BREAKER LANE, UH, THE BREAKER VALLEY SUBDIVISION AND BLUE GOOSE ROAD, WHICH WOULD PROVIDE A CONNECTION, UM, FROM CAMERON ROAD TO BLUE GOOSE, UH, IN THIS AREA, FUTURE GROWTH.

AND IT'S A FULL BUILD OUT, UM, THE ENTIRE, UH, ARTERIAL, AND WE'LL ALSO BE PROVIDING, UM, MITIGATION IN THE FORM OF SIGNALIZATION AND, UM, TURN LANES.

UM, SO WITH THAT, I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS, AND THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

HEAR FROM, UH, MS. LORELLA LOFTUS ON THE TELECONFERENCE, MS. LOFTIS SELECT STAR SIX, PROCEED WITH YOUR REMARKS.

MS. LOFTIS, IF YOU'LL SELECT STAR SIX AND PROCEED WITH YOUR REMARKS, MR. LEFTIST.

IF YOU'RE HAVING A NIGHT, UM, ISSUES FEEL FREE TO CALL BACK IN AND WE'LL TRY TO, UM, WORK THROUGH THE PROCESS THAT WAY CHAIRMAN'S OFFICE IS CALLING BACK IN AT THIS TIME.

OKAY.

AND WE'LL JUST HANG ON JUST FOR A SECOND OR TWO.

THANK YOU.

I KNOW IT TAKES A FEW SECONDS TO TYPE IN THE CODE FOR THE MEETING AND GET INTO THE QUEUE.

SO THANK YOU FOR JOINING MS. , IF YOU'LL, UH, JUST PROCEED WITH YOUR REMARKS AT THIS TIME.

[00:45:01]

HI, MY NAME IS LORELLA LAST DESK.

UM, I LIVE IN HARRIS BRANCH AND MY PROPERTY, MY BACKYARD BACKS ON TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.

LUCAS IS ALREADY A NARROW AND DANGEROUS ROAD.

I DRIVE ON IT EVERY DAY, AND THERE ARE A LOT OF TRUCKS, UM, ON THIS ROAD, UM, AND LARGE CONSTRUCTION TRUCKS WOULD MAKE IT EVEN MORE DANGEROUS TO DRIVE ON TRAFFIC WITH ALSO INCREASE SUBSTANTIALLY WITH THE NEW SUBDIVISION.

AND THIS ROAD IS INADEQUATE.

IN ADDITION, THAT WILL BE DISRUPTIVE AND CONTINUOUS CONSTRUCTION NOISE FOR A SUBSTANTIAL TIME.

AND THE FURTHER IT WOULD OBSTRUCT THE OPEN VIEW AND CAUSE A LACK OF PRIVACY.

THAT CONCLUDES MY, UH, MY, MY, UH, POINTS.

THANK YOU.

YOU CAN SHARE.

WELL NOW HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT FOR A THREE MINUTE REBUTTAL.

OKAY.

SO NO REBUTTAL.

OKAY.

ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU.

THE APPLICANT DOESN'T HAVE A REBUTTAL.

OKAY.

SO DO I HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING? OKAY.

COMMISSIONER STERN MAKES THE MOTION IS THE SECOND COMMISSIONER BARRERA RAMIREZ OR CHAIR? BERRERA RAMIREZ.

OKAY.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR.

RAISE YOUR HAND.

ALL OPPOSED.

SAME SIGN IT'S UNANIMOUS.

THANK YOU.

OKAY.

QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION? EXCUSE ME, MR. JERRY.

I JUST HAVE A QUESTION.

YES.

COMMISSIONER STERN.

YES.

UM, LOOKING AT THE, AT THE SITE PLAN, IT WAS UNCLEAR WHETHER THERE'S GOING TO BE A CONNECTION TO GAELIC DRIVE.

UM, THERE WAS A LOT OF DISCUSSION ABOUT, UM, BRAKER LANE COMING THROUGH, BUT THAT DOESN'T EXIST YET.

AND, UM, AND I, I SHARE SOME OF THE CONCERNS ABOUT BUILDING A LARGE PROPERTY.

THAT'S ALL FEEDING ONTO BLUE GOOSE WHEN WE COULD BE TRYING TO CONNECT TO HARRIS BRANCH OR TO CAMERON ROAD.

SO I WAS WONDERING IF THE SITE PLAN WILL CONNECT TO GAELIC THROUGH HARRIS BRANCH AND ALSO, UM, THE UNNAMED ROAD THAT'S AT THE NORTH SIDE, NORTH AND WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY.

UM, IF THAT IS GOING TO BE IMPROVED TOWARDS CAMERON ROAD IN THESE INTERVENING YEARS, UM, COMMISSIONER JEFF HOWARD FOR THE APPLICANT.

UH, THANK YOU FOR YOUR QUESTIONS.

UH, THERE WILL BE A CONNECTIONS PROPOSED TO, UH, HARRIS BRANCH.

I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S AT GAELIC, BUT THERE'S A CONNECTION TO THE EAST TO HARRIS BRANCH, UM, IN KIND OF THAT SOUTHERN PORTION, IF THAT'S WHERE YOU'RE REFERRING TO, THERE ALSO BE A CONNECTION ON THE NORTH SIDE, UM, TWO CONNECTIONS TO THE NORTH ONE AT THE SORT OF THE WIDEST PART, AND THEN ANOTHER CONNECTION AT THE NARROWEST PART FURTHER NORTH.

AND THEN THERE WILL BE ADDITIONAL CONNECTIONS TO THE, UM, TO THE BREAKER VALLEY SUBDIVISION AS WELL.

THE, THE TIA DOES, UH, MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THE TIA DOES ADDRESS TIMING AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE BREAKER LANE, UM, ROADWAY.

SO WE WILL BE, WE WILL BE BUILDING THAT, UM, UM, YOU KNOW, FULLY DESIGNED AND BUILT, UH, IN A TIME SET FORTH IN THE TIA.

AND I, SO YOU WON'T HAVE THE FULL DEVELOPMENT HAPPENING AND WE'RE WAITING ON THE CITY TO BUILD IT.

WE'LL BE BUILDING IT AS PART OF OUR REQUIRED MITIGATION.

THANK YOU.

YEAH.

I JUST SAID, I GUESS IT'S REALLY MORE REQUESTING FOR STAFF.

IT WOULD BE HELPFUL WHEN WE'RE LOOKING AT THESE, LIKE WE'VE GOT THE DRAWING OF PROPOSED BREAKER, BUT WE DON'T REALLY HAVE A GOOD UNDERSTANDING OF WHERE THE EXISTING CONNECTIONS ARE GOING TO BE.

CAUSE IT LOOKS LIKE GALA COMES TO THE NORTH SIDE DIRECTLY.

IT LOOKS LIKE THE, YOU KNOW, THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS THERE AND THERE'S POSSIBILITIES, BUT I DON'T KNOW THAT MAYNOR ISD IS LETTING YOU BUILD ROADS RIGHT THROUGH THERE.

AND THEN THERE'S THE CONNECTION TO CREAMER AND IT'S A CAMERON AND IT'S SORT OF BUILT INTO IT, BUT THERE'S NO CLEAR INDICATION OF WHERE THESE ROADWAYS COME INTO OR OUT OF THE PROPERTY AT THIS POINT, IT'S HEATHER CHAFFIN, HOUSING AND PLANNING.

THESE ARE NOT ITEMS TYPICALLY, UH, PROVIDED TO US AT TIME OF ZONING.

UM, THE INFORMATION WE HAVE IS THAT THE PROPERTY WILL HAVE FRONTAGE ON BREAKER BLUE GOOSE AND THAT SKINNY FLAG TOWARD CAMERON.

THOSE ARE ALL EXISTS.

THOSE ARE ALL OF THE MAIN ARTERIALS.

I, I WASN'T AWARE OF IF THERE WERE GOING TO BE ANY CONNECTION, TIGRIS, BRANCH, PUD, AND THE

[00:50:01]

BREAKER VALLEY TO THE WEST, IT MIGHT BE SOMETHING THAT THE APPLICANT COULD PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT OF.

THANKS COMMISSIONER.

JUST TO CLARIFY, I DO BELIEVE THERE IS A, UH, EXTENSION PROPOSED IN OUR PRELIM AGAIN, MS. UH, MS. CHAFFIN'S, RIGHT? THESE ISSUES GET DRESSED AT PRELIMINARY PLAN AND AS PART OF YOUR STANDARD, UH, AUSTIN TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT, THEY WILL ENSURE THAT THEIR CONNECTIONS MADE TO OTHER SUBDIVISIONS.

IT'S PART OF THE CODE REQUIREMENT, BUT, BUT THE CONNECTION TO GAELIC IS ONE.

I THINK THAT LOOKS LIKE IT IS PROPOSED NOW THAT I SEE THE MAP TO GAELIC, UH, AND THERE'S, AND THERE'S OTHERS AS WELL.

THANKS.

I APPRECIATE THE CLARIFICATION JUST BECAUSE, UM, WHILE BREAKER MAY BE EXPANDED IN THE FUTURE.

I THINK THE CONCERN THAT WE HEARD FROM NEIGHBORS IS WHAT DO WE DO IN THE FIVE TO SEVEN YEARS BETWEEN NOW AND THE COMPLETION OF THOSE ROADS? SO, UM, THANKS FOR CLARIFYING, OKAY.

COMMISSIONER GREENBERG.

UM, NORMALLY I'M UP TO THE POINT OF VIEW THAT ZONING BEGINS WITH THE LETTER G DOES NOT BELONG NEXT TO SINGLE FAMILY.

UM, SO WOULD I BE CORRECT IN UNDERSTANDING THAT IT WON'T BE NEXT TO SINGLE FAMILY? IT WOULD BE ACROSS THE STREET? UH, YES.

IF YOU LOOK AT THE ZONING MAP AND I THINK THE ARIEL IS A LITTLE TOO ZOOMED OUT TO SHOW A TRACKED.

ONE IS THE PROPOSED AND IT IS ADJACENT TO ALL OF THE HARRIS BRANCH RESIDENTIAL.

NOW SOME OF THESE OTHER PROPERTIES TO THE WEST ARE UNDEVELOPED.

UH, FOR EXAMPLE, THE, UH, BREAKER VALLEY SUBDIVISION I GUESS, HAS BEEN APPROVED, BUT THERE'S ONE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL HOUSE.

SO IN A WAY IT IS ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL ZONED PROPERTY, BUT NOT COMPARABLE TO LIKE THE HARRIS BRANCH DEVELOPMENT.

YEAH.

I WAS MORE CONCERNED ABOUT THE GR OH, I'M SORRY.

YES.

I JUST SKIPPED RIGHT PAST THAT.

UM, SO WHEN THIS IS COMPLETED OR CONSTRUCTED TRACK TWO WOULD BE BORDERED BY BREAKER LANE TO THE NORTH BLUE GOOSE TO THE SOUTH.

AND THAT KIND OF NARROW RECTANGULAR PIECE IS OWNED BY A WASTE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS. IT IS NOT A RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY, SO THAT WILL BE SURROUNDED BY ROADS.

THANKS.

THAT ANSWERS MY QUESTION.

THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER.

DINKER UM, THIS IS THE COMMIT A QUESTION FOR MS. SHAPEN DO, IS THERE A PRELIMINARY, IS THERE A SITE PLAN FILED FOR THIS NOW? BECAUSE OKAY.

UH, JUST A QUICK, UM, IT WOULD BE REAL HELPFUL IF YOU KNOW, OF THESE IN FUTURE CASES WERE NOT A CONCEPTUAL PLAN, BUT IF THERE'S A PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN, LET US KNOW, UM, OR SITE PLAN FILED CONCURRENTLY, PLEASE LET US KNOW.

YEAH, THERE, THERE ARE NO SUBDIVISIONS OR SITE PLANS FILED AT THIS TIME, AND THIS IS GOING TO NEED A TIA BECAUSE OF THE VOLUME OF TRIPS.

I LOOKED IT UP 20,000.

OH, IT'S GOING TO HAVE TRAFFIC IMPACT FACE.

YES.

UH, THE TIA IS CURRENTLY UNDER REVIEW.

WE WEREN'T ABLE TO GET THE TIA MEMO IN TIME FOR THE REQUIRED PRIOR TO APPROVAL BY CITY COUNCIL.

IT'S DISAPPOINTING TO HEAR THAT WE'RE ALL VERY FRUSTRATED WITH, I THINK WITH THE AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC INFORMATION WE'RE GETTING, UM, CONNECTIONS, SUBSTANDARD ROADS, HOW THEY'RE GOING TO BE ADDRESSED, UM, ET CETERA, ET CETERA.

UM, BUT WE'LL TALK ABOUT THAT A LITTLE MORE LATER.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION? OKAY.

OKAY.

UM, YOU KNOW, I JUST HAVE A QUESTION, YOU KNOW, WHEN I LOOKED AT THE MAP ON THIS, IT SEEMS LIKE, YOU KNOW, THERE'S THIS WASTE DISPOSAL BUSINESS YOU JUST MENTIONED.

AND THEN I LOOK INTO ZOOM OUT A LITTLE BIT.

I CAN SEE SOME LANDFILLS AROUND THERE, WHATEVER.

SO I JUST, I JUST WANTED TO ASK THE QUESTION ABOUT THIS PARTICULAR SIDE.

IS IT EVER BEEN USED AS A LANDFILL OR THE ENVIRONMENTAL KIND OF REVIEW OR ANALYSIS OF THIS? IS THERE ANY, ANY ISSUES? IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY AN AGRICULTURAL USE WITH ONE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE.

AND I BELIEVE IT'S BEEN IN THAT CONFIGURATION FOR A VERY LONG TIME.

THE, UH, THE SMALL PARCEL THAT'S, UH, OWNED BY WASTE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS IS NOT USED FOR, UH, LANDFILL, UH, ALL TO MY KNOWLEDGE, ALL OF THE LANDFILL IS SOUTH OF LUCAS ROAD.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

OKAY.

ANY, ANY

[00:55:01]

OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? DO I HAVE A MOTION ON THIS CASE? I MOVE TO APPROVE ALL SECOND.

OKAY.

WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER STARTING TO APPROVE A STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND, UH, WHICH IS, UM, FOR TRACK ONE AND G R M U FOR TRACK TWO AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER DENVER.

OKAY.

ANY DISCUSSION ABOUT THE MOTION? OKAY.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION.

RAISE YOUR HAND.

OKAY.

IT'S UNANIMOUS.

OKAY.

AND JUST A QUICK CHECK-IN WITH THE COMMISSION, UM, CHAIR, BARBARA RAMIREZ.

I UNDERSTAND YOU MAY HAVE TO LEAVE.

AND SO, UH, THAT WOULD, AS IT STANDS RIGHT NOW, THAT WOULD PUT US DOWN TO SIX.

UM, AND SO IF WE DO GET DOWN TO SIX, THEN WE MAY WANT TO CONSIDER POSTPONING THE OTHER CASES, SINCE WE ONLY HAVE SIX, SIX MEMBERS HERE, IF A COMMISSIONER OR KOSTA, YOU KNOW, UH, AS I UNDERSTAND HE WAS TRYING TO GET HERE.

IF HE DOES MAKE IT HERE BEFORE YOU LEAVE, THEN WE CAN CONTINUE ON.

UM, BUT THAT'S UP TO THE COMMISSION.

SO ANYWAY, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

OKAY.

SO WE'RE ONTO THE NEXT ITEM

[B6. Rezoning: C14-2021-0141 - Agave Annex; District 1]

AND THAT IS ITEM B, ITEM B SIX, C 14 20 21 0 1 4 1, UH, GABI ANNEX.

GOOD EVENING, HEATHER CHAFFIN HOUSING AND PLANNING CASE C 14 20 21 0 1 41, A GAVI ANNEX DISTRICT.

ONE REQUESTING TO GO FROM SF TO, TO SF FOUR.

A, UH, THE PROPERTY IS ADDRESS OFF OF ROGERS LANE, ROGERS LANE AND WEST ROGERS LANE.

IT'S ABOUT 17.28 ACRES STAFF IS SUPPORTING THE REQUEST TO REZONE, TO SFA WITH THE ADDED CONDITION THAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC ANALYSIS, WHICH HAS BEEN PERFORMED IS ATTACHED VIA A PUBLIC RESTRICTIVE COVENANT.

OKAY.

UH, THE, THE NTA HAS BEEN, UH, PREPARED AND IS ATTACHED TO THE REPORT.

UH, THE PROPERTY IS PROPOSING TO TAKE ACCESS TO BOTH, UH, NET COVE, WHICH IS PART OF THE AGAVA NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE WEST AND WEST ROGERS LANE, WHICH IS ALONG THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THIS PROPERTY.

UH, THE PROPERTY IS WEST OF ROGERS LANE.

AND THEN AGAIN, THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY IS WEST ROGERS LANE.

THERE IS A SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE AND IS OTHERWISE UNDEVELOPED ACROSS ROGERS LANE TO THE EAST AND ACROSS WEST ROGERS LANE TO THE SOUTH.

IT'S MOSTLY SF TWO WITH SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES AND RELATED STRUCTURES.

THERE ARE ALSO SOME TRACKS THAT ARE ZONED SF THREE AND SFA FIVE THAT HAVE COME BEFORE YOU ALL IN THE PAST YEAR OR SO.

UM, AND THEN CLOSER TO THE ENTRANCE OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD ARE, UH, PROPERTIES ZONED, SF SF, TWO LR AND LR, M U.

THESE HAVE FRONTAGE ON FM 9 69.

THE LRSM PROPERTY CURRENTLY HAS A SMALL SHOPPING MINI SHOPPING CENTER HAS FOOD SALES LIMITED RESTAURANT AND PERSONAL SERVICES LAND USES.

UH, THE OTHER PROPERTIES ALONG 9, 6, 9 OR END DEVELOPED NORTH OF THE REZONING TRACT IS LAND ZONED MH DEVELOPED WITH A LARGE MOBILE HOME, UH, NEIGHBORHOOD NORTHEAST OF THE ZONING TRACK IS AND ZONED LAND IN THE ETJ.

THAT IS ALSO PART OF THAT SAME, UH, MOBILE HOME PARK, UH, WEST OF THE PROPERTY IS THE AGAVA NEIGHBORHOOD ZONED SF THREE.

THE NTA HAS BEEN PREPARED, UH, FOR A DEVELOPMENT WITH APPROXIMATELY 107 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES, WHICH WILL NOT EXCEED 1200 VEHICLES PER DAY ON ROGERS LANE AND A NET COVE, UH, AND PER THE NTA THAT IS MAINTAINING A DESIRABLE LEVEL OF SERVICE AND WE'LL CONTINUE TO DO SO WITH THE ADDITION OF THE ADDED TRAFFIC.

I ALSO HAVE ATD STAFF HERE AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.

STAFF SUPPORTS THE REQUEST.

SMALL LOT.

SINGLE FAMILY WILL PROVIDE, UH, A VARIETY OF HOUSING TYPES IN THIS AREA SINCE IT'S PREDOMINANTLY MOBILE HOME.

UM, AND THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH, UH, POLICIES AND, UH, ADOPT POLICIES AND PRINCIPLES ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL.

THANK YOU.

NOW WE HEARD FROM THE APPLICANT.

THANK YOU, JERRY.

WE'LL NOW HEAR FROM MS. LEAH BOJACK AND SPECIAL.

YOU'LL HAVE SIX MINUTES.

HELLO, COMMISSIONERS AND LEAH

[01:00:01]

BO JO WITH DRAENOR GROUP HERE REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT.

THANK YOU.

UM, YOU COULD MOVE TO THE NEXT SIDE, PLEASE.

SO HERE YOU CAN SEE WHERE THE SITE IS LOCATED OFF OF FM 9 69, BETWEEN 180 3, A AND DECKER LANE, ADJACENT TO THE AGAVA NEIGHBORHOOD.

NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.

YOU CAN SEE ZOOMED IN HERE A LITTLE BIT MORE CLOSELY AT THIS ABOUT A 17 ACRE LOT.

IT'S CURRENTLY VACANT.

I BELIEVE IT HAD AS MANY AS TWO SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON IT AT ONE POINT, BUT I THINK THEY'VE ALREADY BEEN REMOVED.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

UM, AS HEATHER DESCRIBED, WE'RE CURRENTLY ZONED SF TWO, WHICH HAS A MINIMUM LOT SIZE OF 57 50, AND ALLOWS ONE HOME PER LOT.

WE'RE REQUESTING, UH, THE ZONING OF SF FOUR A, WHICH ALSO ALLOWS ONE HOME PER WATT, BUT HAS A SMALLER MINIMUM LOT SIZE OF 3,600 SQUARE FEET.

UM, THIS IS SIMILAR TO SOME PORTIONS OF THE AGAVA SUBDIVISION AND THIS PROJECT WOULD BE CONSIDERED A NEW PHASE OF THAT SUBDIVISION.

UM, STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF OUR REQUEST.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

UM, HERE, YOU CAN SEE A ZONING MAP, SO YOU CAN SEE THAT WE HAVE, UM, SF SIX TO THE SOUTH S OF THREE TO THE EAST.

YOU CAN SEE SOME OF THE THERE TO THE TOP LEFT OF THE SCREEN.

UM, MOBILE HOME TO THE NORTH, LIKE HEATHER SAID, NSF TWO TO THE WEST.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

UM, SO WE'RE JUST OVER 17 ACRES, LIKE I SAID, AND THIS WOULD BE AN EXTENSION OF THE SUBDIVISION, UM, SIMILAR, UH, TO THAT SUBDIVISION AND THAT IT WOULD BE MOSTLY FOR SALE.

NICE, MORE MODESTLY SIZED HOMES, UM, WITH A COMMITMENT TO ENERGY EFFICIENCY.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

UM, IN CASE YOU HAVEN'T VISITED A GAVI, UH, YOURSELF, I JUST THOUGHT I'D SHOW YOU A PICTURE OF WHAT THE SUBDIVISION LOOKS LIKE TODAY.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

SO THIS IS WHAT OUR PROPOSED LAYOUT LOOKS LIKE RIGHT NOW.

WE'RE STILL OBVIOUSLY WORKING THROUGH DESIGN, BUT YOU CAN SEE, UM, THE NETWORK OF ROADS AND THAT BLUE STAR IS WHERE THE CONNECTION TO A NET COVID IS PROPOSED TO BE, WHICH WOULD BE WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING IS TO PUT, UM, A TRAFFIC CIRCLE, UM, I BELIEVE, OR A ROUNDABOUT, I MIX THEM UP, BUT SOMETHING IN THAT, IN THAT CONNECTION TO BOTH, UM, PROVIDE A PLACE-MAKING OPPORTUNITY AND ALSO TO SLOW THE TRAFFIC, UM, AS IT DRIVES THROUGH THAT CONNECTION.

NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.

UM, HERE, JUST TO SHOW YOU SORT OF THE PROXIMITY OF THIS NEW SITE TO THE EXISTING, UH, GAVI NEIGHBORHOOD, NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

UM, SO WE HAVEN'T, WE HAVE MET WITH, WITH NEIGHBORS BOTH ON THE AGAVA SIDE AND ON THE ROGERS LANE SIDE, UM, AND HAVE HAD SEVERAL CONVERSATIONS WITH THEM ABOUT SOME CONCERNS.

SO THESE ARE THE CONCERNS THAT WE HAVE HEARD.

UM, MANY OF THESE CONCERNS WOULD BE ADDRESSED ALREADY THROUGH THE SUBDIVISION AND SUBDIVISION CONSTRUCTION PLAN THAT WOULD COME ALONG WITH THE DEVELOPMENT THINGS LIKE, UM, IMPROVEMENTS TO ROGER'S LAYING ALONG OUR, ALONG OUR FRONTAGE, LIKE DRAINAGE, CURBING GUTTERS, STREETLIGHTS, AND SIDEWALKS.

AND WE'LL ALSO BE PROVIDING AMPLE PARKING FOR THOSE RESIDENTS.

I KNOW THAT WAS A CONCERN THAT WE HEARD FROM FOLKS WHO LIVE ON, UM, PARTICULARLY ON THE ROGERS LANE SIDE.

UM, NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

UH, AND THEN WE'VE ALSO, UM, WE'VE COMMITTED THROUGH A PRIVATE COVENANT TO, UM, PROPOSE AND PERMIT, UM, AND BUILD A TRAFFIC CIRCLE THERE AT THAT CONNECTION.

LIKE I REFERENCED BEFORE, YOU KNOW, THIS IS AN IMPORTANT CONNECTION.

I UNDERSTAND THAT SOME OF THE FOLKS AREN'T HAPPY ABOUT THE CONNECTION THROUGH, BUT I THINK IT'S A REALLY IMPORTANT CONNECTION, UM, TO BUILD OUT THE STREET AT, PARTICULARLY WITH THE CONDITION OF ROGERS LANE, UM, IN WEST ROGERS LANE.

UM, SO, YOU KNOW, THIS WOULD BE A PLANTED, THIS IS JUST AN EXAMPLE, OF COURSE, BUT THIS WOULD BE A PLANTED TRAFFIC CIRCLE THERE THAT WOULD HELP SLOW TRAFFIC AND PROVIDE A SORT OF A GATEWAY OPPORTUNITY THERE AND WHERE THEY MEET BILL AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH NATO STANDARDS.

UM, NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

UM, ON THE, ON THE ROGERS LANE SIDE, THE MAIN CONCERN WE HEARD ABOUT WAS DRAINAGE ISSUES.

UM, AND SO WHAT WE'VE PROPOSED ON THIS SIDE IS TO, UM, ENLARGE THE CULVERT, UM, WHERE THERE IS WATER POOLING THERE, UM, WHERE YOU CAN SEE WHERE THAT YELLOW DASH LINE MEETS WE CAN TAKE.

WE'RE TAKING A FAIR AMOUNT OF LAND OUT OF THE FLOODPLAIN, MOSTLY ON PRIVATE PROPERTY, BUT I THINK THE MORE IMPORTANT, UM, BENEFIT TO THE AREAS THAT WE'D BE REDUCING THE WATER ELEVATION IN THE CHANNEL THERE.

SO WE'D BE REDUCING THE CHANCE OF WATER, UM, UH, ACCUMULATING ON THE ROADWAY.

UH, NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

UM, AND BOTH OF BOTH OF THOSE, UM, YOU CAN MOVE TO THE NEXT SLIDE WHENEVER YOU'RE READY.

UM, SO, SO TO SUMMARIZE, UM, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE, UH, ABOUT 17 ACRES OF, UM, UH, VACANT LAND OR TWO WE'RE PROPOSING TO PUT ABOUT A HUNDRED UNITS ON, UM, YOU KNOW, IN THE INTEREST OF TRYING TO WORK WITH THE NEIGHBORS.

I KNOW, LIKE I SAID, I KNOW NOT EVERYONE IS HAPPY, PARTICULARLY WITH THE CONNECTION, BUT WE ARE, WE'RE TRYING TO KIND OF COME TO THEM WITH SOME SPECIFIC, UM, EXTRA BENEFITS THAT, UM, WOULD HELP THE WHOLE AREA, NOT JUST THE NEW RESIDENTS THAT WOULD BE MOVING INTO THESE HOMES.

UM, AND WITH THAT, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU.

IT, THANK YOU.

AND, UH, NOW, UH, LET'S SEE, DO WE HEAR IT? WE HAVE SPEAKERS ON THIS ITEM.

YES, SIR.

SO WE'LL NOT HEAR FROM MIRA, MISS MARIA C AND ISABEL WHEN YOU'LL HAVE SIX MINUTES.

THANK YOU.

[01:05:39]

MS. BOWEN, YOUR SELECT STAR SIX PROCEED WITH MARKS.

SHOULD WE WAIT UNTIL WE ACTUALLY HAVE A QUORUM? SO YEAH, RIGHT NOW IT LOOKS LIKE LET'S SEE.

YEAH.

WE'RE BACK TO A QUORUM.

OKAY.

YES.

THANK YOU.

SURE I'M GOING TO WORK WITH MS. BOWEN TO SEE IF WE GET HER ONLINE.

I DID MISS A, UM, A FEW INDIVIDUALS IN ON SUPPORT, UH, MR. BRANDON PHARMA HANEY, MR. MEYER, PHARMA HEANEY FIELDS, SELECT STAR SIX.

THANK YOU.

OKAY, THANK YOU.

NO LONGER NEEDED.

UH, FIRST AND FOREMOST, THE HOUSING IS A HUMAN RIGHT.

WE NEED MORE OF IT AND I STILL SINGLE FAMILY, SINGLE FAMILY ZONING.

SO WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT ANY KIND OF SCARY DENSITY.

THE REASON IT ALLOWS THE IN TOWN TO USE SMALLER LOTS FOR A MORE SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY.

A LOT OF US HAVE BEEN HIT PRETTY HARD WITH TAX APPRAISALS, WHICH IS DUE TO THE LACK OF AVAILABLE HOUSING, DRIVING UP SELLING PRICES OF HOMES, WHICH THEN IN TURN DRIVES UP OUR TEAK OUT APPRAISAL.

SO WE'RE ALL FINANCIALLY MOTIVATED TO ADD TO THE HOUSING STOCK IN ORDER TO MITIGATE THE RISING COMPETITION OF HOUSING AND REDUCE ECONOMIC DISPLACEMENT.

THAT'S ESPECIALLY TRUE IN THE EASTERN CRESCENT DUE TO THE HISTORICAL POINT OF THE, SORRY, MY WIFE'S SCREAMING.

UH, SO SHE'S PULLED UP MINUTES BEHIND.

UM, MORE THAN THAT THOUGH, THE HOUSING CRISIS IS CAUSING REAL PAIN, WHICH IS WHY I DEPLOYED THIS ITEM.

<