Link


Social

Embed


Download

Download
Download Transcript


[Call to Order]

[00:00:05]

GOOD MORNING EVERYBODY.

UH, CALL TO ORDER THE SPECIAL CALLED MEETING OF THE AUSTIN CITY COUNCIL.

IT IS DECEMBER 7TH, 2023, AND IT'S 10 O'CLOCK IN THE MORNING.

WE ARE MEETING IN THE AUSTIN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, WHICH ARE LOCATED IN CITY HALL AT 3 0 1 WEST SECOND STREET IN AUSTIN, TEXAS, AND A QUORUM OF THE AUSTIN CITY COUNCIL IS PRESENT.

AGAIN, I WANNA WELCOME EVERYONE THAT'S HERE.

UH, WE APPRECIATE YOUR ATTENDANCE TODAY AND THOSE THAT ARE WATCHING AND PAYING ATTENTION.

AS I INDICATED THIS IS A SPECIAL COLD MEETING.

IT IS A SPECIAL COLD MEETING THE AUSTIN CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER WHAT HAS BEEN GENERALLY REFERRED TO AS THE PROPOSED HOME ORDINANCE.

LET ME EXPLAIN HOW WE'LL PROCEED DURING THE COURSE OF THE DAY.

FIRST, WE WILL HEAR FROM THE AUSTIN CITY STAFF, UH, FOR QUICK REMARKS BY CITY STAFF ON THE AGENDA ITEM THAT'S BEFORE US.

THEN I WILL ASK COUNCIL MEMBERS TO LAY OUT PROPOSED AMENDMENTS THAT THEY MAY BE PROPOSING LATER IN THE DAY, OR, UH, WHEN WE TAKE UP THE ITEM.

UH, WE'RE DOING THAT SO THAT THOSE OF YOU IN THE PUBLIC WILL HAVE THE TRANSPARENCY OF KNOW WHAT, KNOWING WHAT WE WILL BE CONSIDERING, UH, IN TOTO AS BEST WE CAN AT THIS POINT IN TIME, MEANING BOTH THE, OR THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE AND THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS.

UH, WE'LL JUST LAY THOSE OUT SO THAT PEOPLE WILL HAVE THEM.

UM, I WOULD ALSO INDICATE THAT TO, TO MY COLLEAGUES ON THE COUNCIL, IF YOU KNOW YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT SOMETHING AND YOU HAVE NOT ALREADY TOLD STAFF, UH, WHAT THOSE, WHAT YOU MAY NEED, WHO YOU MAY NEED TO ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS, PLEASE GO AHEAD AND DO THAT AS QUICKLY AS YOU CAN SO THAT WE CAN MAKE SURE THAT SOMEONE'S HERE, UH, TO, TO ADDRESS THOSE.

ONCE WE LAY OUT THOSE AMENDMENTS, WE WILL THEN HEAR FROM THOSE WHO ARE WISHING TO SPEAK.

EACH PERSON WILL HAVE TWO MINUTES, AS I INDICATED ON THE MESSAGE BOARD.

PEOPLE MAY DONATE TIME TO SOMEONE SO THAT A SINGLE SPEAKER CAN SPEAK UP TO SIX MINUTES.

IF YOU'RE DONATING TIME, PLEASE SEE THE CITY CLERK OVER HERE TO MY RIGHT, TO YOUR LEFT, TO COMPLETE A TIME DONATION FORM IN ADVANCE SO THAT WE CAN BE ORGANIZED.

THE DONORS OF TIME MUST BE PHYSICALLY PRESENT AT THE TIME.

UH, THE PERSON TO WHOM THEY'VE DONATED TIME IS, UH, GOING TO BE SPEAKING AGAIN, DUE TO, I, I MENTIONED THIS BEFORE I CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER, BUT LET'S, LET'S GO OVER A COUPLE OF OTHER THINGS.

DUE TO THE LARGE NUMBER OF IN-PERSON SPEAKERS, THE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS ROOM, UH, WHICH IS ACROSS THE ATRIUM HERE, IT WILL BE USED AS AN OVERFLOW ROOM.

SO IF YOU WANT TO, YOU CAN, UH, PEOPLE CAN BE THERE, UH, AND WATCH AND, AND, AND KNOW WHAT ORDER WE'RE GOING IN.

A TXN WILL BE STREAMING THE MEETING IN THE OVERFLOW ROOM, AS WELL AS, UM, SO THAT YOU'LL, YOU'LL BE ABLE TO KEEP UP.

SPEAKERS WILL BE ABLE TO CHECK THE ORDER OF UPCOMING SPEAKERS AT THE KIOSK OUTSIDE THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS.

BUT I DO ASK THAT YOU PLEASE, PLEASE BE PATIENT WITH THE SYSTEM.

DUE TO THE VOLUME OF SPEAKERS THAT HAVE SIGNED UP, THERE MAY BE A LITTLE BIT OF LAG TIME.

WE HAVE TWO PODIUMS THAT ARE SET UP, UH, SO THAT PEOPLE, HOPEFULLY WE CAN ACT IN A, A, AN EFFICIENT MANNER AND, UH, OUT OF RESPECT FOR THOSE WHO ARE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK LATER IN THE DAY WHEN YOUR NAME IS CALLED.

UH, AND THE CLERK'S OFFICE WILL CALL NAMES, UH, MORE THAN ONE NAME AT A TIME WHEN YOUR NAME IS CALLED.

PLEASE MAKE YOUR WAY DOWN TO THE FRONT WHEN YOU HEAR YOUR NAME, NOT WHEN YOU THINK IT'S GONNA BE YOUR TIME TO SPEAK, BECAUSE WE, WE, AGAIN, WANNA BE RESPECTFUL OF THE PEOPLE THAT MIGHT BE FOLLOWING YOU, AND WE WANNA MOVE WITH SOME EFFICIENCY.

AND THE REASON WE HAVE TWO PODIUMS, AS OPPOSED TO WHAT WE TYPICALLY DO, WHICH IS JUST ONE PODIUM, IS SO THAT PEOPLE CAN ALTERNATE AND BY ALTERNATING, UH, WE'LL BE ABLE TO HEAR SPEAKERS, UH, IN A MORE ROUTINE FASHION.

A COUPLE OF OTHER THINGS.

ONE IS, I'VE MENTIONED THIS BEFORE AND I'LL, I'LL, I'LL, I WANNA SAY IT AGAIN.

OUR RULES ALLOW FOR SIGNS, UH, AND IN THE BACK OF THE ROOM, AS I INDICATED, WE'VE BEEN A LITTLE LAX ON THAT IN THE, IN THE PAST COUPLE OF WEEKS.

BUT THE REASON WE DO THAT, PARTICULARLY ON A DAY LIKE TODAY WHERE WE HAVE, UH, A FULL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, IS BECAUSE EVERYBODY HAS A RIGHT TO SEE AND PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCESS.

AND IF SIGNS ARE HELD UP, UH, SOMEPLACE OTHER THAN IN THE BACK OF THE ROOM, AND WE

[00:05:01]

CAN SEE 'EM, BUT IF SIGNS ARE HELD UP, THEN YOU'RE BLOCKING SOMEONE.

SO I WOULD ASK THAT AND, AND WE'LL ENFORCE, PLEASE DON'T PUT SIGNS IN SEATS WHERE YOU'RE BLOCKING A SEAT FROM SOMEBODY, AND PLEASE DON'T HOLD SIGNS IN A WAY THAT YOU'RE BLOCKING SOMEONE'S VIEW OF THE DAIS AS THEY ARE HERE ALSO TRYING TO PARTICIPATE IN THE HEARING.

WE'RE ALSO, UH, ASKING THAT PEOPLE DON'T ALL COME UP AND GATHER BEHIND THE PODIUM.

IF SOMEONE IS CALLED ON TO SPEAK, LET THAT PERSON COME FORWARD AND LET THAT PERSON SPEAK.

OBVIOUSLY, THERE MAY BE SOME, UM, UH, EXCEPTIONS TO THAT.

IF, IF SOMEONE COMES UP AND THEY HAVE A, A CHILD WITH THEM OR SOMETHING OF THAT NATURE, OR DEMONSTRATIONS AROUND THE PODIUM AREN'T GOING TO BE ALLOWED BECAUSE WE WANT TO HEAR FROM EVERYBODY IN AN EFFICIENT AND ROUTINE MANNER.

UH, IF YOU ARE HERE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE HEARING, UH, YOU HAVE SPOKEN AND YOU HAVE THE ABILITY TO OPEN UP A SEAT FOR SOMEONE THAT'S GOING TO SPEAK AFTER YOU, UH, I WOULD ALSO ASK THAT YOU BE COURTEOUS TO THE SPEAKERS FOLLOWING YOU, AND YOU OPEN UP THAT SEAT SO THAT OTHERS MAY MOVE INTO THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AND BE A PART OF THE PROCESS.

ALL RIGHT, I THINK THAT COVERS EVERYTHING.

I WILL, UM, UH, MAKE A FEW COMMENTS JUST BEFORE WE START THE, THE PUBLIC COMMENT PART, BUT I WILL NOW CALL UPON,

[1. Conduct a public hearing and consider an ordinance amending City Code Title 25 (Land Development) that would allow up to three housing units, including tiny homes, on single-family (SF) zoned property; revise regulations that apply to a property with two housing units; and remove restrictions on the number of unrelated adults living in a housing unit.]

UM, UH, THE CITY MANAGER, UH, TO BE RECOGNIZED AS WE GO INTO, UM, OUR DISCUSSION OF THIS IMPORTANT ORDINANCE.

UH, MAYOR COUNSEL, WE HAVE, UH, VERONICA ENO, THE ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER THAT'S IN, UH, CHARGE OF THIS ITEM, AND SHE WILL BE MAKING A BRIEF PRESENTATION, THEN TURN IT OVER TO THE STAFF FOR ADDITIONAL DETAIL.

GOOD MORNING, MAYOR AND COUNSEL.

THANK YOU.

VERONICA ENO, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER.

I FIRST WANNA START BY THANKING STAFF.

I DID THIS LAST TIME AT WORK SESSION, BUT I WANNA ECHO THAT.

THANKS.

STAFF HAS WORKED TIRELESSLY TO GET TO THIS POINT.

THEY HAVE WORKED THROUGH A THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY, AND THEY HAVE BEEN MAKING SURE TO GET ALL OF YOUR QUESTIONS ANSWERED, PROVIDING INFORMATION THAT HAS BEEN REQUESTED AND SO FORTH.

SO YOU'LL SEE SOME OF OUR STAFF HERE TODAY, BUT THEY'RE STANDING BEFORE MANY BEHIND US, SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH TO OUR STAFF.

TODAY IS THE FINAL PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO RESIDENTIAL USES AND STANDARDS IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, INCLUDING PHASE ONE OF THE HOME INITIATIVE.

THE POLICY CONVERSATION ABOUT THIS PROPOSAL BEGAN THIS PAST SUMMER WHEN COUNSEL ADOPTED RESOLUTIONS THAT CALLED FOR THE CODE AMENDMENTS BEFORE YOU TODAY, COUNCIL AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING ABOUT THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS ON OCTOBER 26TH.

ON NOVEMBER 14TH, THE PLANNING COMMISSION VOTED TO RECOMMEND THE COUNCIL APPROVE THE PROPOSAL WITH A VARIETY OF AMENDMENTS.

TWO, THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S KEY RECOMMENDATIONS ARE TO SET A, A MAXIMUM FLORIDA AREA RATIO OR FAR FOR TWO AND THREE UNIT DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE MCMA MCMANSION AREA TO REDUCE THE SIZE UNITS AND TO CREATE THE PRESERVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY BONUSES TO ENCOURAGE HOMEOWNERS TO KEEP ALL OR PART OF AN EXISTING STRUCTURE ON A LOT.

STAFF DESCRIBED THESE AND OTHER PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS DURING A WORK SESSION LAST WEEK ON NOVEMBER 28TH, OVER THE WEEKEND, STAFF PROVIDED A MEMO WITH INFORMATION AND OPTIONS FOR IMPLEMENTING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATIONS.

I WON'T DESCRIBE THOSE IN DETAIL NOW, BUT WE ARE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS OR PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IF NEEDED.

WE UNDERSTAND THAT COUNCIL MEMBERS PLAN TO OFFER AMENDMENTS TO THE PROPOSAL.

STAFF IS AVAILABLE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS AS YOU DISCUSS OPTIONS TO IMPROVE THE, THE PROPOSAL.

WE HAVE STAFF HERE FROM PLANNING DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, HOUSING, TRANSPORTATION, PUBLIC WORKS, AUSTIN, FIRE WATERSHED PROTECTION, AUSTIN WATER, AND AUSTIN ENERGY.

IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS FOR ANY DEPARTMENTS THAT I HAVEN'T NAMED, PLEASE LET ME KNOW, AND WE WILL ENSURE THAT STAFF ARE AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS AFTER WE HEAR FROM THE PUBLIC.

WITH THAT, WE LOOK FORWARD TO HEARING FROM OUR COMMUNITY ON THESE IMPORTANT CHANGES TO OUR LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU, MEMBERS.

ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS POINT? OKAY.

WHAT I WILL DO NEXT IS, AS I INDICATED SO THAT WE WILL HAVE TRANSPARENCY ABOUT WHAT ALL IS BEING CONSIDERED AND THE PUBLIC WILL KNOW AS WE GO FORWARD ON THOSE MEMBERS.

I'M GOING TO CALL UPON INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS THAT I KNOW HAVE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS SO THAT YOU CAN JUST LAY OUT THE AMENDMENT SO THAT THE PUBLIC WILL KNOW WHAT THAT PROPOSED AMENDMENT LOOKS LIKE AND WHAT THE BASIS OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT IS.

AND, UM, AND THEN WE WILL GO TO PUBLIC COMMENT AND, UM, IN NO PARTICULAR ORDER, I JUST OPENED MY, MY NOTEBOOK.

YES.

COUNCIL MEMBER, KELLY, YOU HAVE SOMETHING? YEAH, I WAS JUST WONDERING IF WE COULD PUT THOSE AMENDMENTS UP ON THE SCREEN SO THAT THOSE AT HOME COULD SEE THEM IF THEY HAVEN'T ALREADY, AND THEN THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE COULD AS WELL.

WELL, I, I DON'T KNOW THAT WE'RE PREPARED TO DO THAT RIGHT NOW.

OKAY, THANKS.

AND SO WE CAN EITHER NOT PUT 'EM UP OR WE CAN DO 'EM LATER WHEN, WHEN IT COMES TIME TO VOTE.

UH, BUT I, SO WHAT I'LL, WHAT I'LL DO IS I WILL ASK STAFF TO WORK ON,

[00:10:01]

UH, WHEN WE GET TO THE TIME FOR VOTING, WHETHER WE, WE CAN BE ABLE TO DO THAT.

AND FOR NOW, JUST ASK THAT COUNCIL, LAY OUT THE AMENDMENTS.

DOES THAT WORK FOR YOU? THAT'S GREAT.

THANK YOU.

GOOD, GOOD.

UH, AND MAYBE WE REMIND THEM THEY'RE ALSO ON THE MESSAGE BOARD SO THAT THEY CAN VIEW THEM THERE AS WELL.

THANK YOU, YOU MAYOR.

THAT'S IT.

THAT'S A VERY GOOD REMINDER.

UM, YEAH, I'M SITTING UP HERE.

I'M NOT GONNA FOLLOW YOUR RULE FAULT.

WELL, I'M SORRY.

YOU'RE GONNA HAVE TO THE DEAL.

THIS DUDE, DANIEL, YOU KNOW WHAT? I'M SORRY, SIR.

YOU'RE OUT OF ORDER.

BUILD THE HOUSE.

YOU'RE, YOU'RE OUT OF ORDER.

AND I'M GONNA ASK THAT YOU BE EXCUSED FROM THE, THE CHAMBERS.

WE'RE NOT GONNA START THIS WAY, SIR.

PAUL, PLEASE, PLEASE ESCORT HIM.

YOU DON'T GET THAT THOUGH.

YOU DON'T GET THAT.

I'M SORRY.

THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE.

A PROBLEM.

MY PEOPLE, MY PEOPLE IN AUSTIN ARE HURT.

THANK YOU, SIR.

PLEASE.

THAT'S GOING, MAN.

THIS THING IS WRONG, MAN.

PLEASE NOT GOING TO DO IT.

I'M SORRY.

PLEASE ENFORCE OUR RULES AND THAT'S F****D UP.

PLEASE.

I'M GOING.

COME ON FOLKS.

YOU MESSED UP.

THAT'S THE DEAL.

AND THAT'S THE DEAL ON YOU, MAN.

Y'ALL ME LAYING OUT.

DON'T COUNCIL MEMBER, COUNCIL MEMBER VELA, IF YOU DON'T MIND, I'M GONNA ASK YOU, I'M GONNA ASK YOU TO LAY OUT YOUR PROPOSED AMENDMENT.

THANK YOU.

MAYOR CHAIR RECOGNIZES THE COUNCIL MEMBER VELA.

THANK YOU, MAYOR.

I, I HAVE, UH, THREE AMENDMENTS.

ALL I WOULD CHARACTERIZE AS KIND OF TWEAKS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, UH, VERSION, UM, THE AMENDMENT, UH, ONE MOTION SHEET NUMBER ONE, WHICH HAS BEEN, UH, PASSED OUT TO EVERYONE.

UH, CHANGES THE, I'D SAY SIMPLIFIES THE, UH, UH, FLOOR AREA RATIO.

THE FAR CALCULATIONS, UH, THE CURRENT FAR CALCULATIONS INCLUDE, UH, A SERIES OF COMPLICATED, UH, EXCEPTIONS AND ARE KIND OF DIFFICULT TO ADMINISTER.

THIS PROVIDES JUST A SIMPLE AND CLEAN DEFINITION FOR FLORAL AREA, UH, RATIO.

UH, IT ALSO DOES, UH, IT PUSHES UP THE, UH, MAXIMUM FAR FOR A 0.65 UNIT, UH, TO, UH, 43 50, OR I SHOULD SAY THE MINIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE FROM, UH, 37 50 SQUARE FEET TOTAL TO 43 50 SQUARE FEET TOTAL TO MAKE SURE THAT THE THREE UNIT CONFIGURATIONS ON SMALLER LOTS HAVE, UH, ENOUGH, UH, SQUARE FOOTAGE.

UH, AND THEN IT, UH, AND THEN IT ADJUSTS THE, UH, TWO EXISTING DWELLING UNITS.

THERE'S A, THERE'S A DISTINCTION IN, UH, THE CURRENT VERSION WHERE, UH, THE TWO, UH, UNIT FORMATION, THE DUPLEX FORMATION GETS 0.5 FAR IN ONE, UH, PORTION OF THE, UH, ORDINANCE AND 0.55 IN THE OTHER.

AND WE JUST, UH, MAKE BOTH OF THOSE 0.55.

SO IF YOU'RE DOING TWO UNITS, REGARDLESS OF OF OF WHAT THE HISTORY OR, OR OR SITUATION IS, YOU GET THE SAME AMOUNT OF, UH, FAR.

THAT'S, UH, MOTION SHEET NUMBER ONE.

UH, MOTION SHEET NUMBER TWO DEALS WITH THE MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK.

UM, CURRENTLY, UH, CITYWIDE IT'S, UH, 25 FOOT SETBACK FOR THE MCMANSION AREA.

IT IS A COMPLICATED CALCULATION WHERE YOU, IT'S THE AVERAGE OF A MULTIPLE UNITS.

THAT'S, AGAIN, A VERY DIFFICULT TO ADMINISTER.

FOLKS HAVE TO HIRE A SURVEYOR, GO OUT AND MEASURE THE, THE FRONT, UH, SETBACKS ON THE, YOU KNOW, ESSENTIALLY THE BLOCK.

AND THEN TAKE THE AVERAGE, WE, UH, CHANGE IT TO A STANDARD 15 FOOT, UH, SET MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK.

UH, THAT WAY THE HOUSES CAN BE A LITTLE BIT CLOSER TO THE CURB.

AND THAT GIVES PEOPLE, AGAIN, A LITTLE BIT MORE FLEXIBILITY IN DESIGNING, UH,

[00:15:01]

THEIR UNITS.

UM, I WOULD ALSO NOTE THAT ON, UH, REDUCING THE, UH, FRONT YARD SETBACK, UH, WE WILL REDUCE IMPERVIOUS COVER.

UH, A BIG CHUNK OF IMPERVIOUS COVER IS THE DRIVEWAY, YOU KNOW, THE DRIVEWAY, THE FARTHER BACK THE DRIVEWAY HAS TO GO TO THE HOUSE.

THE MORE CONCRETE WE HAVE TO, UH, POUR IN ORDER FOR THAT DRIVEWAY TO REACH THE, THE, THE HOUSE.

SAME THING WITH THE, UH, THE SIDEWALK.

SO BY MOVING THE HOUSES UP CLOSER TO THE FRONT OF THE STREET, THERE'S GONNA BE LESS DRIVEWAY AND THUS, UH, LESS, UH, IMPERVIOUS COVER.

UM, AND THEN THE OTHER, THE LAST ONE IS ALSO INVOLVES A, UH, A, UH, SETBACK.

ALTHOUGH THIS ONE IS, UH, CHANGING THE SETBACKS FOR A STREET SIDE, UH, A STREET SIDE YARD SETBACK, MEANING WHERE A HOUSE FRONT IS A CORNER HOUSE WHERE IT FRONTS THE, UH, STREET, BUT THEN THE SIDE OF THE HOUSE FRONTS A SIDE STREET.

UH, RIGHT NOW THE, UH, SETBACK ON THE SIDE OF THE HOUSE THAT IS ON THE SIDE STREET IS 15 FEET.

UH, WE ARE REDUCING IT TO FIVE FEET.

UM, THIS AMENDMENT IS DESIGNED TO ALLOW CORNER, LOTS TO HAVE FRONT FACING TO IN, TO HAVE, ESSENTIALLY, WHEN YOU DO THREE UNITS ON A CORNER LOT, YOU WOULD THEN BE ABLE TO HAVE THREE STREET FACING UNITS.

IF WE'RE ALLOWING THEM TO GET A CLOSER TO THE, UH, SIDE STREET SETBACK, BASICALLY ON CERTAIN LOTS, IT WILL HELP THAT ALIGNMENT SO THAT ALL THE HOUSES HAVE SOME, UH, STREET, UH, FRONTAGE.

THOSE ARE MY THREE AMENDMENTS.

MAYOR.

THANK YOU.

COUNCIL MEMBER.

I'LL RECOGNIZE COUNCIL MAYOR, IF WE HAVE QUESTIONS ON AMENDMENTS, WHEN DO YOU WANT US TO TAKE THOSE? WHEN WE BRING 'EM UP? OKAY.

UM, I'LL NOW RECOGNIZE COUNCIL MEMBER POOLE, AND THEN COUNCIL MEMBER CADRE.

COUNCIL MEMBER ALLISON ALTER.

AND THEN COUNCIL MEMBER RYAN ALTER.

SO COUNCIL MEMBER POOLE, THEN COUNCIL MEMBER CADRE MAYOR.

THANKS.

UM, I AM BRINGING ONE AMENDMENT THAT MAINTAINS OUR STANDARD ORDINANCE EFFECTIVE DATE, BUT GIVES STAFF 60 DAYS, THE 60 DAYS THEY NEED TO SHAPE THEIR PROCEDURES FOR APPLICATIONS.

AND JUST A LITTLE BIT OF INFORMATION ABOUT THAT.

I POSTED THIS AMENDMENT AND AN UPDATE FROM LEGAL TO THE MESSAGE BOARD.

THE AMENDMENT IS RELATED TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE HOME ORDINANCE, GIVING CITY DEPARTMENTS ENOUGH TIME TO DEVELOP THEIR PROCESSES TO SUPPORT THE PROGRAM.

THANK YOU, MAYOR.

THANK YOU.

COUNCIL MEMBER.

COUNCIL MEMBER CADRE.

I MAKE MINE REALLY QUICK.

UH, WE'RE BRINGING A HISTORIC PRESERVATION, UH, AMENDMENT, UH, MY AMENDMENT ENSURE COORDINATION BETWEEN THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF.

UM, ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PRESERVATION BONUS, IT ADDRESSES STAFF'S MEMO OF CONSIDERATIONS THAT IT WAS RELEASED LAST FRIDAY.

AND I JUST WANNA EMPHASIZE HOW VALUABLE THIS PRESERVATION BONUSES TO OUR CITY, AND ESPECIALLY IN DISTRICT NINE, PRESERVING EXISTING STRUCTURES FURTHERS THE CITY'S AFFORDABILITY, UM, CULTURAL PRESERVATION AND CLIMATE GOALS BY DIVERTING CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS FROM THE LANDFILL.

SO I BELIEVE THIS AMENDMENT WILL HELP ENSURE THE PROGRAM'S SUCCESS.

THANK YOU.

COUNCIL MEMBER, UH, COUNCIL MEMBER ALLISON ALTER.

THEN COUNCIL MEMBER RYAN ALTER.

GOOD MORNING AND THANK YOU EVERYONE FOR COMING OUT THIS MORNING TO HAVE YOUR VOICES HEARD.

UM, I POSTED ONE AMENDMENT, UM, RELATED TO SHORT, SHORT-TERM RENTALS.

UH, VERSION TWO HAS BEEN DISTRIBUTED WITH SOME ADDITIONAL EDITS FROM LAW, UM, AS POSTED, UH, THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE WOULD EXPAND SHORT-TERM RENTALS BEYOND OUR EXISTING LIMITS AND ALLOW A HUNDRED PERCENT OF NEWLY DEVELOPED SITE UNDER THIS USE TO BE A MULTI-UNIT.

SHORT-TERM RENTAL.

WHILE I BELIEVE SHORT-TERM RENTALS HAVE A ROLE TO PLAY IN CREATING THE VIBRANT AND HOSPITABLE CITY THAT WE ASPIRE TO BE, I DON'T TYPICALLY HEAR THE CONCERN RAISED IN OUR COMMUNITY THAT WE HAVE TOO FEW SHORT-TERM RENTALS.

GIVEN THAT I WOULD PREFER THAT ANY EXPANSION OF SHORT-TERM RENTALS BE CONSIDERED MORE COMPREHENSIVELY, RATHER THAN USING THIS ITEM AS A VEHICLE TO CHANGE OUR EXISTING LIMITS ON THIS USE, INCREASING THE POTENTIAL FOR HIGH INCOME INVESTOR DRIVEN USE OF OUR LIMITED HOUSING STOCK DOES NOT, IN MY ESTIMATION FURTHER OUR HOUSING SUPPLY GOALS.

UM, WHAT WE ASKED LAW TO DRAFT WAS SOMETHING THAT WOULD KEEP, UM, THE SDR RULES, UM, THE SAME AS WHAT WE HAVE NOW.

AND SO THAT IS WHAT IS IN YOUR BACKUP.

UM, SECONDLY, I HAD REALLY HOPED THAT SOME OF MY COLLEAGUES WOULD PUT FORWARD SOME OF THE AMENDMENTS THAT OUR STAFF HAD RECOMMENDED THAT WOULD IMPROVE, UM, THE PROPOSAL.

UM, SEEING THAT THOSE ARE NOT ON OFFER, I'LL BE WORKING WITH STAFF TO PREPARE, UM, SOME OF THOSE AMENDMENTS.

SO, FOR INSTANCE, UM, ONE THAT DOES ALTERNATIVE ONE WITH RESPECT TO THE FAR THAT EXEMPTS, UM, GARAGES, UM, WITHOUT ADDING ADDITIONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE TO THE FAR, UM, WE, WE NEED TO BE CAREFUL HOW WE DO THAT.

IT HAS A BIG

[00:20:01]

POTENTIAL IN IMPACTS.

UM, AND ALSO FOR THE FRONT SETBACK FOLLOWING WHAT STAFF RECOMMENDED WITH RESPECT TO THE PORCH.

UM, I ALSO WILL HAVE AN AMENDMENT ADDING, UM, SOME REQUESTS FOR DATA TO WATSON'S AMENDMENT FOR THE STUDY, UM, RELATED TO UNDERSTANDING WHAT SIZE UNITS WE'RE ACTUALLY GETTING FROM, UM, THIS PROPOSAL.

UM, AND I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO LISTENING TO THE COMMUNITY AND MAY, UM, SINCE WE'LL HAVE A LONG TIME, MAY FASHION SOME OTHER AMENDMENTS ALONG THE WAY THIS MORNING.

THANK YOU.

COUNCIL MEMBER.

COUNCIL MEMBER RYAN ALTER IS JOINING US VIRTUALLY.

HELLO, EVERYBODY.

OH, LET'S SEE.

THERE WE GO.

SORRY, I GET A HELPER TODAY.

THERE YOU ARE.

UM, .

OH, SO I HAVE AN AMENDMENT RELATED TO TREE PRESERVATION.

SO WHAT THIS WILL DO IS LOOK AT WAYS THAT WE CAN ENSURE THAT TREES ON A LOT ARE PRESERVED THROUGH A VARIETY OF, OF OPTIONS, WHETHER IT'S AN ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE OR POTENTIALLY ALLOWING SOMEBODY TO BUILD A LITTLE BIT INTO THE SETBACK.

IF THEY'RE AVOIDING A TREE, UH, STAFF'S GOING TO MAKE SOME RECOMMENDATIONS ON WHAT WOULD BE THE MOST EFFECTIVE AND COME BACK TO US IN MARCH SO THAT WE CAN PRESERVE OUR TREE CANOPY.

THAT'S IT.

THANK, THANK YOU.

COUNCIL MEMBER.

THANK Y'ALL.

UH, MEMBERS, UH, I'LL END THIS PART OF OUR PROGRAM WITH, UM, LAYING OUT AN AMENDMENT THAT I WILL OFFER.

UH, I PUT THIS UP ON THE MESSAGE BOARD AND, UH, PUT UP A RED LINE VERSION.

BUT, UH, WITH A PROGRAM LIKE THIS, WE NEED TO ALSO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE STUDYING THE DATA AND THE EFFECTS AND IMPACTS OF SUCH AN AN ACTION.

AND SO MY, UH, MOTION TO AMEND WOULD INCLUDE THAT WE RECEIVE AT A MINIMUM THE FOLLOWING THINGS IN A REPORT STARTING THREE MONTHS, AND THEN SIX MONTHS, AND THEN A, UH, THREE, I'M SORRY, SIX MONTHS, THREE MONTHS, SIX MONTHS AND A YEAR.

AND THEN, UH, ON AN ANNUAL BASIS FOR A MINIMUM OF FIVE YEARS, DATA METRICS FOR ENACTING THE INITIATIVE THAT INCLUDE THINGS LIKE THE NUMBER OF PERMITS APPLIED FOR AND REQUESTED.

UNDER THIS, THE NUMBER OF DEMOLITION PERMITS, MARKETING ANALYSIS RELATED TO HOUSING PRICES AND THE PRICE OF THE VARIOUS, UH, TYPES OF UNITS.

ALSO RELATED TO GEOGRAPHIC IMPACT OF THIS ORDINANCE, DOING AN ANALYSIS OF THE GEOGRAPHIC IMPACT, A ANALYSIS, AND PROVIDING DATA ON WITH REGARD TO POTENTIAL DISPLACEMENT OF COMMUNITIES OF COLOR, AND UTILIZING DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION.

UH, IT WILL ALSO SEEK AN ANALYSIS RELATED TO INFRASTRUCTURE IMPACTS, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS, AND THEN TAKE INTO ACCOUNT VARIOUS PLANS OF THE, THE CITY, SUCH AS THE CLIMATE EQUITY PLAN, THE WATER FORWARD PLAN, AND FORWARD, AS I INDICATED.

UM, IT WOULD ALSO DO A COMPARISON OF WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THE PREVIOUS THREE YEARS SO THAT THE DATA ALLOWS FOR A COMPARISON, UH, WHERE WE CAN MAKE DETERMINATIONS ABOUT ACTUAL IMPACT.

WITH THAT, UH, WE WILL BEGIN OUR PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD.

I'M GOING TO TURN TO THE, UH, CITY CLERK'S OFFICE TO ASK, UH, FOR HELP IN NAVIGATING THAT.

UH, THE FIRST WE WILL HEAR FROM ARE PEOPLE THAT ARE, UH, UH, WANTING SPANISH TRANSLATION TRANSLATION FROM, UH, SPANISH.

SO WE WILL HEAR THOSE, UH, FOLKS FIRST.

THEN WE WILL GO TO THE REMOTE SPEAKERS, AND THEN WE WILL GO TO THE IN-PERSON.

SPEAKERS, THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR BEING HERE AND FOR HELPING US OUT.

OKAY, MAYOR, THE FIRST SPEAKER, UM, IS REMOTE, BUT HE HAS NOT, UM, CALLED IN.

SO I WILL GO TO IN PERSON M RODRIGUEZ.

TONYA VASQUEZ FOLLOWING IS AMANDA CARILLO.

YOU WANT HER EITHER WAY? YES, I'M SORRY.

YEAH, YEAH, YEAH.

MM-HMM? VASQUEZ.

GOOD MORNING TO EVERYONE HERE.

MY NAME IS ANTONIO VASQUEZ.

I'VE LIVED IN, IN THE EAST AUSTIN FOR OVER 60 YEARS.

[00:25:05]

I'M SEVEN, I'M 72 YEARS OLD.

I, I MOVE SLOWLY, BUT HERE I AM.

MM-HMM, .

I WORK FOR AUSTIN SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR OVER 20 YEARS, AND I'M BEING RETIRED FOR THREE YEARS, AND I THOUGHT THAT I WOULD BE RESTING NOW, BUT, UH, THAT'S NOT THE CASE.

YEAH.

AND I WANT YOU, SO HERE I AM, AND I WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT EVERY TIME THAT I COME HERE TO SPEAK UP, THIS IS THE HEART THAT I HAVE WITH ME.

UH, THIS IS THE COLOR OF THE PEOPLE THAT LIVE IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD.

THESE ARE THE PEOPLE THAT WHERE YOU WILL BE ROLL OVER AND WILL BE DISPLACED, AND, AND YOU WILL CON GO ON, UH, IN ANY CASE, RIGHT? MM-HMM, , MY FAMILY HAS A PROPERTY AND A HOUSE AND A PROPERTY THERE.

AND NOW WE'RE FIND IT VERY DIFFICULT TO HAVE THE MONEY TO REALLY SPREAD AND COVER THE BASIC NEEDS.

I WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT HOME IS NOT GOING TO SOLVE THE, THE HOUSING CRISIS AND IS NOT GOING TO PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS, UH, FOR MIDDLE CLASS HOME SOLO, AS HOME WILL ONLY DE UH, ACCELERATE THE DISPLACEMENT OF TENANTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS.

UH, LOW INCOME PROPERTY OWNERS, HOME PRE COST, UH, HOME WILL INCREASE, UH, OR, OR, OR TAXES, UH, THE RENT.

AND IT WILL ALSO, UH, PROFIT, UH, THE DEVELOPERS THAT WILL BE, UH, BUILDING FOR, UH, FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE VERY WEALTHY, HOME DOESN'T HAVE REQUIREMENTS TO MAKE SURE THAT, UH, THERE IS, UH, UH, IT IS SUCCESSFUL FOR LOW INCOME, UH, UH, FOR LOW, FOR LOW INCOME PEOPLE.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

WE APPRECIATE YOUR COMMENTS.

MAYOR.

MAYOR, JUST A MOMENT.

UH, JUST, UH, BECAUSE THERE IS THE DELAY WITH THE TRANSLATION, I WANNA MAKE SURE THAT SHE WAS ABLE TO COMPLETE HER THOUGHT.

WELL, SHE WAS GIVEN, ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE DO IS IF THERE'S TRANSLATION, THEY'RE GIVEN DOUBLE THE AMOUNT OF TIME, SO SHE GOT THE ADDITIONAL THANK YOU.

SO YES.

APPRECIATE IT.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

RODRIGUEZ.

OH, AMANDA CARILLO.

THAT'S GOOD.

SUSANNA, IF WE, IF YOU CAN REMAIN HERE IN CASE, UM, THE REMOTE SPEAKER CALLS IN.

THANK YOU.

UM, I'LL PROCEED TO, IN, I MEAN, UH, REMOTE SPEAKERS.

RUTH LAUER.

THERE IS A DELAY WITH THE, HELLO? I WANNA MAKE SURE I'M GONNA TURN PHONE OFF.

SORRY.

OKAY.

HELLO, MY NAME IS RUTH LAUER, MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS, THANK YOU FOR LETTING ME SPEAK TODAY.

I AM SPEAKING IN OPPOSITION TO THE HOME INITIATIVE.

I SUPPORT EFFORTS TO CREATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING AT AUSTIN.

HOWEVER, THE HOME INITIATIVE WILL DO JUST THE OPPOSITE.

[00:30:01]

UH, MANY CITIES ACROSS THE US AND THE WORLD ARE ALSO FACING A HOUSING SHORTAGE.

SOME TOWNS HAVE TRIED SIMILAR INITIATIVES.

MINNEAPOLIS, BASTROP, PORTLAND, HOUSTON.

THEY'VE FOUND THAT, UM, THIS INCREASES THE COST OF INFRASTRUCTURE, INCREASES EXPENSIVE HOUSING FOR NEW PEOPLE WITH MORE MONEY MOVING INTO THE AREA, BUT DOES NOTHING FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

I BELIEVE THAT COUNCIL MEMBER RYAN ALTER ALSO KNOWS THIS BECAUSE HE TRIED TO CREATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN EAST AUSTIN, AND HIS PROJECT ENDED UP, UM, BEING SOLD ON THE COUNTY STEPS.

UH, I THINK THAT THIS WILL DO A LOT FOR DEVELOPERS.

THEY'RE THE ONES THAT HAVE THE MONEY.

I CAN, WE DO NEED TO DO SOMETHING FOR HOUSING IN AUSTIN.

I CAN SEE MAYBE DOING SOMETHING IN THE CENTER OF TOWN LIKE THIS OR WITHIN A QUARTER MILE OF TRANSPORT CORRIDORS.

BUT OTHERWISE, I THINK THIS IS JUST GONNA CREATE A BIG MESS.

I'M SORRY THAT YOUNG PEOPLE DON'T UNDERSTAND.

THE HOUSING MARKET IS DIFFERENT FROM THE REST OF MARKETS.

IT'S DRIVEN BY COSTS, AND AS LONG AS PEOPLE HAVE MONEY, THEY'RE GONNA OUTBID EVERY, ALL THE AFFORDABLE, UH, THINGS.

I REALLY REQUEST THE CITY TO STEP IN AND DO SOMETHING FOR OUR SCHOOL TEACHERS, OUR RETAIL WORKERS, AND OTHERS.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR TIME.

AND I DO, I TOTALLY OPPOSE THIS INITIATIVE.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU, ALEXANDRIA MAYOR.

HELLO, COUNCIL AND MAYOR, IT'S GOOD TO TALK TO YOU TODAY.

I'M SPEAKING IN, IN FAVOR OF THE HOME INITIATIVE WHERE AUSTIN, I'VE BEEN SEEING AUSTIN'S HOUSING CRISIS GROW MORE SEVERE OVER THE LAST NINE YEARS.

HOME.

I, FROM WHAT I'VE SEEN, WILL BE ABLE TO TURN BACK THE CLOCK, WELL TURN BACK THE PROGRESS OF AN, OF GROWING HOUSING PRICES.

IT ISN'T A GOOD STEP TOWARDS ACTUALLY MAKING THINGS MORE ACCESSIBLE FOR EVERYONE IN THE CITY.

I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME AND THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

ANI KIZZY, PLEASE UNMUTE.

LYNN SPROG.

GOOD MORNING COUNCIL MEMBERS.

UM, LYNN HERE.

I'M A DISTRICT ONE RESIDENT, AND I AM CALLING IN STRONG OPPOSITION TO THE HOME INITIATIVE.

UM, I FEEL VERY CLEARLY THAT THIS IS NOT THE SOLUTION TO THE, UM, HOUSING CRISIS IN AUSTIN, AND THAT WE NEED SOLUTIONS THAT ARE ACTUALLY CENTERING OUR MOST AT RISK NEIGHBORS, UM, FOR DISPLACEMENT AND NOT SOLUTIONS THAT WILL JUST BE PUTTING MORE MONEY INTO DEVELOPERS' POCKETS.

SO I URGE YOU TO LOOK FOR DIFFERENT SOLUTIONS.

UM, THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION.

AND I ALSO WANT TO SAY THAT, UM, YOU ALSO, IT'S NOT TOO LATE FOR THE COUNCIL TO ISSUE A RESOLUTION, UM, FOR THE CEASEFIRE AGAINST THE GENOCIDE IN PALESTINE.

THANK YOU, MAYOR.

I BELIEVE THIS IS AMANDA CARILLO.

GOOD MORNING.

CAN YOU HEAR ME? DO LET ME ASK A QUESTION.

ARE ARE, DO YOU HAVE, DO YOU NEED A WANT TRANSLATION? NO.

OKAY.

SO YOU KNOW WHAT, YES.

SO THAT THE, THE SPANISH SPEAKER COMMUNITY CAN UNDERSTAND.

YES.

OKAY.

YES.

SO I'M GONNA SPEAK IN ENGLISH IF YOU CAN TRANSLATE FOR ME, PLEASE.

NO, NO, THAT'S NOT WHAT WE'RE DOING.

OKAY, THAT'S FINE THEN.

I DON'T NEED TRANSLATION THEN.

IS SHE THEN SHE'S OUT OF ORDER.

I'M SORRY.

YOU'RE OUT OF ORDER.

WE, WE HAD, YOUR NAME WAS CALLED BECAUSE WE BELIEVE YOU, YOU NEEDED OR WANTED A SPANISH TRANSLATOR SO THAT YOU COULD SPEAK SPANISH.

OH, NO, SIR.

I DO NOT NEED, SO WE'LL CALL ON YOU, UH, WHEN WE GET TO PEOPLE IN PERSON.

NEXT SPEAKER IS JEREMY HENDRICKS.

UH, GOOD MORNING COUNSEL.

GOOD MORNING, MAYOR.

I'M JEREMY HENDRICKS WITH THE LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION.

I REPRESENT CONSTRUCTION WORKERS WHO BUILD THIS BOOMING CITY, AND I'M A RESIDENT OF DISTRICT FOUR, AND I'M ALSO A RECENTLY ELECTED PRESIDENT OF THE WINDSOR HILLS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.

I'M HERE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE HOME ACT THAT WILL HELP CREATE MORE HOUSING

[00:35:01]

OPPORTUNITIES FOR OUR MEMBERS.

AND THEY'RE STRUGGLING TERRIBLY WITH RISING RENTS AND MORTGAGES, SADLY.

AND I'M ALSO LEADER WITH THE CENTRAL TEXAS BUILDING TRADES, THE AUSTIN CENTRAL LABOR COUNCIL, WHICH HAVE BOTH ENDORSED ITS IMPORTANT MEASURE BECAUSE OUR MEMBERS NEED IT.

CONSTRUCTION WORKERS ARE ESSENTIAL WORKERS TO THE FUTURE OF AUSTIN AND CENTRAL TEXAS.

BUT SADLY, OUR MEMBERS ARE UNABLE TO AFFORD TO LIVE IN THIS CITY.

THEY PROUDLY WORK TO BUILD AND MAINTAIN.

THEY'RE STRUGGLING WITH ADDITIONAL HOUSING FOR THEIR CHILDREN, FOR THEIR AGING PARENTS.

AND SADLY, THIS HOUSING CRISIS IS MAKING IT MORE AND MORE DIFFICULT TO FIND THE SKILLED WORKERS NEEDED TO KEEP OUR BUILDING BOOM GOING.

SO THE NEED FOR THE THE PASSAGE OF THE HOME ACT IS CRITICAL AND URGENT.

TO ADDRESS THIS SHORTAGE OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING, HOME IS A CRUCIAL STEP IN MAKING OWNERSHIP MORE ACCESSIBLE AND REVERSING THE RISING COST OF HOUSING.

THE PRICES OUR MEMBERS OUT OF THIS MARKET.

WE IN LABOR, ARE ALARMED BY THE WIDENING GAP BETWEEN THE AVERAGE SALARY AND THE COST OF HOMES, WHICH THREATENS THE LONG-TERM SUSTAINABILITY AND GROWTH OF OUR CITY.

WE ARE ALSO CONCERNED THAT AS MORE MEMBERS ARE FORCED TO MOVE FURTHER OUT OF AUSTIN, THEY LOSE THEIR ABILITY TO VOTE AND CHOOSE THE LEADERS AND POLICIES, POLICIES THAT ACCURATELY REFLECT THEIR VALUES.

UNFORTUNATELY, WE'RE LOSING THE BEATING HEART OF OUR COMMUNITY WHEN WE LOSE OUR TEACHERS, OUR FIREFIGHTERS, OUR EMS WORKERS, OUR HEALTHCARE WORKERS, OUR CITY WORKERS, OUR CONSTRUCTION WORKERS, AND OTHERS WHO SIMPLY CAN'T AFFORD TO LIVE IN, IN, OR NEAR AUSTIN.

THESE ESSENTIAL WORKERS DESERVE THE CHANCE TO LIVE AND THRIVE HERE AS PART OF OUR COMMUNITIES, AS NEIGHBORS, AS HOMEOWNERS.

AND WE MUST TAKE THIS ACTION, UH, BY PASSING THE HOME ACT.

SO PLEASE, I URGE YOU TO GIVE THE HOME ACT YOUR FULL SUPPORT AND WORK TOGETHER TO ENSURE A SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION TO MAKE THIS CITY, UH, A CITY FOR EVERYONE.

AND I ALSO APPRECIATE MAYOR ADLER, OR EXCUSE ME, MAYOR WATSON'S ADDITIONAL, UH, AMENDMENT TO ADD, UH, THE, UM, THE RESEARCH ALONG THE WAY SO THAT WE CAN MAKE SURE THIS IS WORKING FOR EVERYONE.

THANK YOU AND HAVE A GREAT DAY.

NEXT SPEAKER IS M SHAW.

YES, I OPPOSE THE HOME PLAN, WHICH WILL CAUSE NOT DESTRUCTION OF TREES AND SHRUGS IN A GREEDY RUSH TO MAKE PILES OF MONEY WHERE AMERICAN FOR GREEDY, I GREEDY PEOPLE ARE GONNA GET AS MUCH MONEY OUT OF THEIR PROPERTY AS THEY CAN.

AND THIS IS A BIG BOONDOGGLE FOR ALL OF US WHO OWN PROPERTY.

RIGHT NOW.

ALL THIS DESTRUCTION WILL ALSO INCREASE FLOODING.

YOU SAY THAT YOU'RE GOING TO CONSIDER FLOOD PLAIN DESIGNATIONS, BUT HUH AT LEAST WHITE PEOPLE ARE THE MOST LITIGIOUS PEOPLE.

AMERICAN, WELL, WHITE AMERICANS ARE THE MOST LITIGIOUS PEOPLE ON EARTH.

AND EVERYONE I KNOW WHO HAS EVER RECEIVED A FLOOD CLAIM DESIGNATION WHO DOES NOT LIVE ON THE COAST, HAS SUCCESSFULLY FOUGHT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ON THAT, INCLUDING PEOPLE IN UNIVERSITY HILLS, WHICH IS WHERE I OWN A PROPERTY AND HAVE OWNED IT FOR 30 YEARS.

THAT PROPERTY IS A HAVEN FOR BIRDS, TREES, WILD FLOWERS.

I THOUGHT THE CITY SUCCESSFULLY THIS SUMMER TO BE ALLOWED TO KEEP A YARD FULL OF WILD FLOWERS OUT FRONT BURDEN.

THESE ARE CRUCIAL TO OUR SURVIVAL AS SPECIES.

BUT THE BIGGEST PROBLEM IS FLOODING AND UNIVERSITY HILL.

WHAT THERE HAS BEEN STANDING WATER 18 INCHES DEEP AT LEAST 200 TIMES IN 30 YEARS IN MY BACKYARD.

IN THIS PARTICULAR DROUGHTY CENTURY, I'VE HAD LITTLE WALNUT CREEK 15 FEET UP THE INCLINE IN MY FRONT YARD.

THE CREEK BOTH FLOWED OVER THE BRIDGE BY WILLAMETTE AND MISPRONOUNCED WILLAMETTE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND FLOWED UP THROUGH STORM DRAINS.

STILL, I'M NOT IN THE FLOODPLAIN IN THE LATE NINETIES.

I KNOW ONE HOUSE.

WELL, I I'VE ALREADY COVERED THAT.

PEOPLE WHO FIGHT FLOODPLAIN DESIGNATION IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD SAYING THAT YOU WILL CONSIDER THE FLOODPLAIN DESIGNATION IS COMPLETELY DISINGENUOUS, MEANINGLESS.

WE ARE SLASH FLOOD ALLEY AND ALL OF AUSTIN THANK YOU IS DOWNSTREAM FROM SOMETHING.

THANK YOU.

SPEAKER, YOUR TIME HAS EXPIRED THAT ARE DRY MOST OF THE TIME.

NEXT SPEAKER IS JESSICA CURRY.

GOOD AFTERNOON.

THANK YOU FOR, UM, ALLOWING ME TO SPEAK.

I'M AGAINST THIS INITIATIVE IN ITS CURRENT FORM AS IT OFFERS NO PROTECTIONS TO CURRENT HOMEOWNERS AND WILL NEGATIVELY IMPACT THE HOMEOWNER'S QUALITY OF LIFE AND INCREASE PROPERTY TAXES, HURTING THE MOST VULNERABLE AND LOWEST INCOME PROPERTY OWNERS BY PUSHING THEM OUT OF THEIR NEIGHBORHOODS.

AND THE CITY OF AUSTIN.

THE WORKPLACES OF THE POPULATION TO WHICH YOU CLAIM TO BE TRYING TO PROVIDE ADDED AFFORDABLE HOUSING OPTIONS ARE ALL OVER THE CITY.

SCHOOLS AND MEDICAL OFFICES SERVE EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD IN AUSTIN TO BE SUCCESSFUL.

THIS INITIATIVE HAS TO INCLUDE LIMITS TO INCREASE DENSITY PER BLOCK, SQUARE MILE A NEIGHBORHOOD.

AND THOSE LIMITS SHOULD NOT BE EXCEEDED IN ANY AREA UNTIL REED

[00:40:01]

CITYWIDE SPREAD THE IMPACTS AND, UH, BUILD CITYWIDE RESPONDING TO REALIZE DEMAND NEIGHBORHOODS AND HOMEOWNERS ALSO NEED PROTECTIONS IN PLACE.

ADDED DEVELOPMENTS ON THE SIDE, UM, WITHOUT ONSITE PARKING SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY AT NO COST.

ALLOW THAT BLOCK TO ENROLL IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKING PROGRAM AND PERMITS ISSUES TIED TO STREET FRONTAGE OF EACH LOT ISSUES WITH INFRASTRUCTURE SHOULD HALT NEW PERMITS UNTIL ISSUE RESOLVED.

AUSTIN ENERGY IS YEARS BEHIND ON SERVICE LINE UPGRADES TO SERVE CURRENT DEMAND.

AUSTIN ENERGY JUST REMOVED THE PAGE ON UPGRADING.

NORTH AUSTIN'S 50-YEAR-OLD LINES THAT RUN OVER MY HOME.

I PRESUME TO AVOID ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS AND ATTENTION TO A PROJECT THAT MORE THAN DOUBLES THE TRANSMISSION CAPACITY, BUT IS YEARS BEHIND IN COMPLETING.

LAST BUT NOT LEAST, OFTEN NEEDS TO PROTECT HOMEOWNERS FROM APPRAISAL VALUES ON LOSS BEING RAISED BASED ON POTENTIAL HIGHEST AND BEST USE WHEN A HOMEOWNER IS NOT TAKING ADVANTAGE OF UP ZONING.

POTENTIAL VALUE ON SPECULATIVE USE SHOULD NOT INCREASE TAXATION ON A PROPERTY UNTIL OR IF EVER REALIZED THE TAXABLE VALUE OF A SINGLE FAMILY LOT SHOULD NOT INCREASE BASED ON UNREALIZED POTENTIAL USE.

AND CHASE HOMEOWNERS OUT OF AUSTIN BY RAISING THEIR TAXES BEYOND THEIR MEANS.

STRUGGLING.

HOMEOWNERS CAN'T AFFORD TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF UPZONING ENTITLEMENTS TO ADD AN A DU OR DUPLEX TO THEIR HOME.

THEY WILL JUST BE TAXED OUTTA THEIR HOME, POTENTIALLY THE ONLY GENERATIONAL WEALTH THEIR FAMILY HAS.

LAST BUT NOT LEAST, SIGNED BAFFLED BY THE CONCENTRATION ON SINGLE FAMILY LOTS TO MEET THIS MIDDLE HOUSING NEED.

USING HOUSTON AS A MODEL OR EXAMPLE, HOUSTON AT LEAST MADE AN ALLOWANCE FOR NEIGHBORHOODS TO OPT OUT BLOCK BY BOX.

AND IN THE END, THANK YOU SPEAKER.

YOUR TIME HAS EXPIRED USED BY MANY OF THE NEIGHBORHOODS, BUT THEY DID LEAST MAYOR.

IF I MAY MAKE A QUICK COMMENT.

WE ARE RECEIVING PHONE CALLS FROM PHONE NUMBERS THAT ARE NOT ON OUR, UH, FINAL SPEAKER LIST, UM, THAT WE ARE NOT ADMITTING, AND WE WILL CONTINUE TO DENY.

SO IF YOU DID NOT REGISTER AND SOMEONE IS DISTRIBUTING THE CALLING NUMBER, YOU WILL NOT BE ADMITTED.

YOU WOULD HAVE HAD TO HAVE REGISTERED.

THANK YOU.

THE NEXT CALLER IS JEANNIE RAMIREZ.

HI, COUNSEL.

I'M JEAN LA I'M A RESIDENT OF GRADUATE 82.

OKAY.

I'M AGAINST THIS.

FIRST OF ALL, THE REASON I'M AGAINST THIS, 'CAUSE I DON'T, I DO NOT TRUST THIS COUNCIL OR THE MAYOR TO OVERSEE TRANSPARENCY BECAUSE OF ACTIONS OF LACK OF TRANSPARENCY, EVEN IN THE HOMELESS BUDGET.

SO WE DON'T NOT HAVE THE INFRASTRUCTURE FOR THIS.

I DON'T SEE ANYTHING BEING ROLLED OUT ON ANY OF THE AGENDAS ON THIS.

UM, AND, AND ALSO NO ONE'S THINKING ABOUT THE WATER HERE.

NO ONE IS THINKING ABOUT WATER.

NO ONE IS THINKING ABOUT THE STRUCTURES THAT ARE GONNA BE SHADING OVER SOMEONE'S YARD.

UH, GARDENING EVERYTHING BECAUSE OF THE HIGH, THE HIGH STRUCTURE.

UM, AND I'M NOT SURE WHAT THE 20 TO 30-YEAR-OLD THAT SPOKE OUT THE FIRST MEETING, WHAT, WHAT ARE YOU EXPECTING? YOU WANNA STAY HERE BECAUSE YOU GRADUATE FROM UT AND GUESS WHAT? YOU'RE NOT GONNA MAKE THE MONEY YOU'RE GONNA MAKE IF YOU DON'T MOVE WHERE THE JOB IS.

AND THEN YOU EXPECT US TO ALSO PAY FOR STUDENT LOANS.

I DON'T UNDERSTAND THIS.

WE, ME AND MY HUSBAND, WE WEREN'T ABLE TO BUY OUR HOUSE.

WE WERE WAY OLD AND IT LOOKS LIKE WE'RE GONNA GET PRICED OUT HERE IN AUSTIN.

YOU KNOW THAT, THAT'S EXACTLY IT.

AND ALSO THIS COUNCIL APPROVED FOR APARTMENTS AND CONDOS RIGHT THERE ON TOWN LAKES.

AND GUESS WHAT? THEY SAID THEY WERE GONNA MAKE THE BUILDER HAVE AFFORDABLE UNITS.

WHERE ARE THOSE? I WANNA KNOW WHAT HAPPENED.

UM, ALSO, THIS IS A LAND GRAPH.

EVERY MONTH WE GET LETTERS FROM PEOPLE WANTING TO BUY.

AND YOU KNOW WHAT? THOSE BUYERS HAVE MONEY.

THEY HAVE THE MONEY THEY HAVE, THEY WANT TO BUYERS OUR HOUSE.

AND, AND, AND YOU THINK THEY'RE GONNA SELL IT FOR AN AFFORDABLE HOUSE? THIS IS RIDICULOUS, MAN.

UM, AND OH, OH, BUT ALL THE SINGLE PEOPLE WHO WANNA BUY SINGLE FAMILY HOMES LATER WHEN THEY DO GET MARRIED, YOU'RE GONNA HAVE TO MOVE OUTTA AUSTIN TO GET THAT.

'CAUSE WE WON'T HAVE THAT IF THIS PASSES.

THANK YOU.

NEXT SPEAKER IS LAURA BLACKWELL.

WELL, HELLO COUNSEL.

MY NAME'S LAURA BLACKWELL, A RENTER IN DISTRICT FOUR, AND I'M SPEAKING OUT TODAY AGAINST THE HOME INITIATIVE AND URGING THE COUNCIL MEMBERS TO PREVENT THE DISPLACEMENT AND ACCELERATION OF AUSTIN'S HOUSING CRISIS THROUGH THE FOLLOWING.

UM, FIRST WE WOULD LIKE A POSTPONEMENT, UH, FOR A LESS BUSY TIME WHEN THE COMMUNI COMMUNITY CAN BE MORE INVOLVED, UM, IN THESE PROPOSITIONS.

AND OF COURSE, I WOULD LIKE THE COUNCIL MEMBERS TO VOTE NO.

UM, SOME ALTERNATIVES THAT PORE AUSTIN IS ASKING FOR, UM, THAT I'M SUPPORTIVE OF ARE PERMITTING ADDITIONAL DWELLING UNITS ON ALL SINGLE FAMILY LOTS WITH CREATIVE FINANCING OPPORTUNITIES LIKE FORGIVABLE LOANS FOR MID AND LOW INCOME HOMEOWNERS, AND, UM, CREATING DENSITY BONUSES, UM, PROPOSED AMENDMENTS.

WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE AN OVERLAY THAT PROTECTS SOME OF AUSTIN'S MOST VULNERABLE

[00:45:01]

NEIGHBORHOODS FROM DISPLACEMENT, UH, BY NOT APPLYING THE UP ZONING, UH, PROPOSED IN HOME, UH, IN THIS LOCATION.

UM, THANK YOU SO MUCH AND HAVE A GOOD MORNING.

NEXT SPEAKER IS MONICA BEATTY.

YES, HELLO, I'M A TRUSTEE FOR THE TEXAS FEDERATION OF WOMEN'S CLUB'S HEADQUARTERS, A 92-YEAR-OLD HISTORIC LANDMARK IN THE OLD WEST UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOOD.

WE OPPOSE THE PROPOSED HOME PLAN AS WE LIVE WITHIN THE OVERDEVELOPED WEST CAMPUS AND ALREADY SUFFER FROM TOO MUCH TRAFFIC AND TOO FEW STREET PARKING OPTIONS.

THE IDEA OF TRIPLING HOUSING AND PARKING WILL MAKE THE ROADS EVEN MORE OF A NIGHTMARE AND A HEAVILY PEDESTRIAN AND BIKING AREA.

THE UNTESTED REAL ESTATE MODEL OF HOPES AND DREAMS, BENEFITS NEWLY ARRIVED INVESTORS, DEVELOPERS, AND LANDOWNERS.

INSTEAD OF THE DECADES LONG EXISTING PROPERTY OWNERS, BASIC SUPPLY AND DEMAND ECONOMIC PRINCIPLES DICTATE THAT AUSTIN DOES NOT, WILL NOT EVER HAVE ROOM FOR EVERYONE WHO WANTS TO LIVE HERE BY RADICALLY CHANGING THE ZONING RULES.

FOR OVER 700,000 CURRENT PROPERTY OWNERS, OUR PROPERTY VALUES WILL IMMEDIATELY DECREASE WHILE TAXES WILL INCREASE DUE TO INCREASED DEMAND FOR CITY SERVICES.

THIS UNPROVEN UNTESTED GAME OF AUSTIN REAL ESTATE POKER IS TOO IMPORTANT TO FAST TRACK WITHOUT MORE COMMUNITY CONSIDERATION AND COMMENTARY.

THE TIMING OF THESE ZONING CHANGES WITHOUT EVEN KNOWING ALL THE FINAL DETAILS AND IMPACT BEING KNOWN AT THIS TIME.

AS ZONING HAS MENTIONED, THESE PROPOSALS ARE BEING RUSHED INTO EXISTENCE WITH FEW CITIZENS BEING INVOLVED DURING THE BUSIEST HOLIDAY AND FAMILY TIME OF THE YEAR.

TO BE COMPLETELY TRANSPARENT, MORE OPEN HOUSES SHOULD BE HELD IN THE 10, UM, COUNCIL DISTRICTS INSTEAD OF JUST ONE.

AND AGAIN, WE OPPOSE THIS BECAUSE IT IS A NIGHTMARE IN THE MAKING.

THANK YOU.

NEXT SPEAKER IS CAROLYN KRUM CREW.

GOOD MORNING.

I, I STRONGLY OPPOSE THE HOME AMENDMENTS, PARTLY BECAUSE CHANGES WOULD BE IN TWO PHASES.

SO IT'S IMPOSSIBLE TO EVALUATE THE EVENTUAL OUTCOME FROM THE PROVISIONS OF THIS FIRST PHASE ALONE.

PLEASE POSTPONE VOTING TO A FUTURE DATE TO INCORPORATE IDEAS TO IMPROVE BOTH AFFORDABILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, AND TO COMBINE PHASE ONE AND PHASE TWO INTO ONE SET OF AMENDMENTS SO THAT THE POTENTIAL CHANGES CAN BE EVALUATED AS A WHOLE.

ONE SET OF SUGGESTIONS TO STRENGTHEN HOME THAT RECENTLY CAME OUT THAT IS WORTH EVALUATING TO IMPROVE DWELLING, AFFORDABILITY AND PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT IS FROM COMMUNITY POWERED A TX.

THE AUSTIN COMMUNITY NEEDS MORE TIME TO CONSIDER THESE IDEAS AND OTHERS.

HOME WOULD BE SUCH A BIG OVERHAUL THAT AUSTIN NEEDS THE TIME TO GET THIS RIGHT.

PHASE TWO WOULD ADD EVEN MORE DENSITY AND MAKE CHANGES TO IMPERVIOUS COVER SETBACKS AND TREE REGULATIONS SO THAT THAT PHASE COULD BE VERY DAMAGING TO THE ENVIRONMENT SUCH AS HIGHER IMPERVIOUS COVER, INCREASED LOCALIZED FLOODING, INCREASED URBAN HEAT ISLAND EFFECT, AND A REDUCTION IN OUR TREE CANOPY.

IN AUSTIN, SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ARE THE SECOND LARGEST CONTRIBUTOR TO CANOPY COVERAGE.

TREES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ARE CRITICALLY IMPORTANT TO THE URBAN FOREST, REDUCING FLOODING, REDUCING HEAT, REDUCING WATER POLLUTION, AND COMBATING CLIMATE CHANGE.

THE 2021 CLIMATE EQUITY PLAN HAS A GOAL OF ACHIEVING A 50% CITYWIDE TREE CANOPY COVER BY 2050.

PRESENTLY, THE CITY HAS ABOUT 40% COVER AND WITH HOME THAT GOAL WOULD BE IN JEOPARDY.

PLEASE POSTPONE VOTING UNTIL BOTH PHASES HAVE BEEN COMBINED INTO ONE SET OF AMENDMENTS.

HOME CAN BE EVALUATED IN A DEMOCRATIC AND FAIR MANNER.

THIS WILL ALSO GIVE TIME TO PROPERLY EVALUATE IDEAS FROM THE AUSTIN COMMUNITY THAT HAVE JUST RECENTLY BEEN PROPOSED.

THANK YOU.

DIANA.

DEAN? HELLO? CAN YOU HEAR ME? YES.

HELLO.

YES, WE CAN.

OKAY.

HELLO, UH, TO OUR COUNCIL MEMBERS AND TO OUR OUR MAYOR.

UH, FIRST OF ALL, I WOULD LIKE TO, UH, LET YOU KNOW THAT MY NAME IS DIANA DEAN.

UH, I WAS BORN AND RAISED IN D ONE, UH, IN OUR 2002 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN WITH THE OCCUPANT HOUSING OCCUP OCCUPANCY.

IT STATED THAT HOMEOWNERS HAVE BEEN OUTPACED BY RENTERS IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD.

WE HAVE, UH, SENIOR HOUSING, WE HAVE RVS, WE HAVE $400,000 HOMES, $600,000 HOMES, $800,000 HOMES, A HOME BEHIND A HOME, A MILLION DOLLAR HOME.

AND ANOTHER THING THAT THAT IS UP AND COMING, WE ALSO HAVE FIVE STORY, UH, LUXURY UNITS AND OTHER DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN OUR, OUR COMMUNITY.

THAT IS ANOTHER LAYER OF DENSITY.

AND AS YOU KNOW, THAT

[00:50:01]

DOES PUT A STRAIN ON OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT, FIRE DEPARTMENT, EMS, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY OF THE COMMUNITY, AND MOST IMPORTANT MENTAL HEALTH OF COMMUNITY AND MENTAL HEALTH OF A SENIOR LIKE MYSELF.

SO I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO SAY THAT, UM, WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT YOUR STAFFERS OUT TO CONTACT TEAMS, CITYWIDE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS AND THE COMMUNITY TO GIVE UPDATES, INPUT, ANSWER QUESTIONS, AND MOST OF ALL TO BUILD TRUST AT THIS PHASE ONE OF THE HOME OPTIONS FOR MIDDLE INCOME EMPOWERMENT.

AND ALSO WITH SO MUCH DENSITY IN MY AREA, WE DO RUN THE RISK OF MIDDLE INCOME PEOPLE THAT LIVE ON LARGE LOTS TO MOVE OUT BECAUSE IT CHANGED THE CHARACTER OF THEIR COMMUNITY.

THANK YOU.

LEILA LEVINSON.

HELLO.

I HAVE THREE MAJOR CONCERNS ABOUT THE HOME ORDINANCE.

THE FIRST ONE IS WHAT THE EFFECT WILL BE ON PROPERTY TAXES BECAUSE I KNOW VERY WELL FROM MY PAST EXPERIENCE IN MY MANY YEARS IN AUSTIN THAT WHEN UM, MORE BUILDINGS ARE ALLOWED TO GO UP ON A LOT, WHEN THE VALUE OF THE LOT INCREASES, THEN THAT TRANSLATES INTO HIGHER PROPERTY TAXES.

MY OTHER CONCERN IS AS SIMILAR TO WHAT OTHER PEOPLE HAVE BEEN EXPRESSING IMPERVIOUS COVER, I LIVE A BLOCK FROM WALLER CREEK, WHICH ANY TYPE OF RAIN EVENT, WHICH MORE AND MORE ARE VERY HEAVY RAIN EVENTS, FLOODS AND FLOODS THE HOMES AROUND IT.

HOW IS REDUCING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR, UM, REDUCING THE INCREASED AMOUNT OF IMPERVIOUS COVER GOING TO AFFECT URBAN FLOODING? AND ALSO AS SOME OTHER PEOPLE HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT, VERY CONCERNED ABOUT TREE CANOPY, WHEN WE SEE WHAT HAPPENED IN AUSTIN LAST SUMMER, WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN NOW WITH REDUCING OUR TREE CANOPY FOR THE ISLAND EFFECT, WHICH IS GOING TO MAKE IT MORE DIFFICULT FOR RAIN TO COME TO AUSTIN, GIVEN WHAT WE KNOW NOW ABOUT THE CONFIGURATION OF CITIES AND HEAT ISLAND EFFECTS AND THWARTING OFF ANY RAIN.

UM, I ALSO AM, WELL ACTUALLY A FOURTH CONCERN.

I DON'T SEE THE INFRASTRUCTURE THAT CAN SUSTAIN THIS KIND OF DEVELOPMENT.

SEWAGE LINES, WATER AVAILABILITY, ELECTRICITY, I JUST DON'T SEE IT IN PLACE.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

ROY WHALE.

HELLO, THIS IS ROY WHALEY, THE CONSERVATION CHAIR FOR THE AUSTIN REGIONAL GROUP, THE SIERRA CLUB.

WE HAVE SIGNED UP NEUTRAL ON THIS AND I'D LIKE TO CLARIFY THAT A LITTLE BIT.

IF I MAY.

IT DOES NOT MEAN WE SUPPORT IT.

IT MEANS THAT WE WANT MORE INFORMATION, WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONS ARE IN PLACE.

AND IT DOES NOT MEAN THAT WE OPPOSE OUR OLD FRIENDS AND ALLIES AND THE EASTERN CRESCENT AND ALL THE, THE RESIDENTS OF THE EASTERN CRESCENT.

WE DO, WE WANT THE, I CAN COUNT VOTES.

I KNOW Y'ALL ARE GONNA PASS THIS.

I HOPE YOU POSTPONE IT SO WE CAN HAVE A DEEPER DISCUSSION ABOUT IT.

BUT IT'S GONNA PASS.

SO WE'RE TRYING TO MAKE IT THE BEST IT CAN BE.

AND THAT IS FOR OUR OLD FRIENDS AND ALLISS AND GAVA AND PODER AND OTHERS.

UM, I WANT TO THANK THE PREVIOUS SPEAKERS TALKING ABOUT THE HEAT ISLAND EFFECT AND, AND THE FLOOD WATERS.

UM, WE WANT TO TO SEE THAT THERE IS STORM WATER PROTECTION AND HOPEFULLY CAPTURE AND READ USE.

UM, THE CODE WILL NEED TO REQUIRE, UH, RAIN GUTTERS AND RAIN WATER TANKS AT A VERY MINIMUM.

UM, WE ENCOURAGE AGAIN, OUR FRIENDS IN THE EASTERN CRESCENT TO CONTINUE THEIR OPPOSITION ON THIS BECAUSE THAT WILL MAKE IT BETTER, WHICH IS WHAT SIERRA CLUB IS GOING, IS TRYING TO DO.

THE IDEA THAT IT WILL STOP SPRAWL IS COMPLETELY BOGUS, AND THIS IS MIDDLE MISSING HOUSING, NOT AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

WE MUST ALSO ADDRESS AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

WE HAVE TO HAVE REAL AFFORDABILITY AND OFTEN.

AND SO I KNOW IT'S A HEADACHE IF YOU HAVE TO POSTPONE THIS 'CAUSE YOU DON'T WANT TO GO THROUGH ALL OF THIS AGAIN.

BUT WE DO NEED TO HAVE A FULLER AND DEEPER DISCUSSION ABOUT THIS.

[00:55:01]

AND, AND THANKS TO CAROLYN CHROME TOO, A SIERRA CLUB MEMBER THAT SPOKE VERY WELL AND OPPOSITION TO THIS THANK AND COVERED A LOT OF THIS.

THANK YOU.

SPEAKER.

YOUR TIME HAS EXPIRED ISSUES THAT CAROL PHILLIPSON.

HELLO? CAN YOU HEAR ME? YES.

YES.

HELLO? YES.

OKAY.

UM, MY NAME IS CAROL PHILLIPSON.

I'M IN DISTRICT 10.

SOMETIMES A PLAN MAY SOUND LIKE THE PERFECT ANSWER IN THEORY, BUT AS WE SEE THIS PLAN UNFOLD, IT IS FAR FROM THE PERFECT ANSWER AS IT IS WRITTEN.

I REALIZE THAT NO ONE LIKES TO ADMIT WHEN THEY'RE WRONG, BUT WHEN IT AFFECTS AN ENTIRE CITY, COMMISSIONERS STAFF AND COUNCIL MEMBERS NEED TO BE ACCOUNTABLE AND ADMIT THIS PLAN NEEDS MORE WORK.

YOUR DECISIONS WILL SEVERELY AFFECT ALL BUSINESS, INCLUDING YOUR HOME, YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD, AND SHOULD NOT BE RIGHT.

THE FUTURE OF AUSTIN IS IN YOUR HANDS.

SO ALL QUESTIONS AND CONCERNS MUST BE ADDRESSED, SUCH AS SEWER LINES MADE FOR SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS, NOW NEEDING TO HANDLE INCREASED AMOUNTS OF SEWAGE AND FIRE HYDRANTS WITH THE CAPACITY TO SAVE ONLY SINGLE FAMILY HOMES.

PLUS NO CONSIDERATION HAS BEEN GIVEN TO THE INCREASED FIRE RISK ASSOCIATED WITH HIGH DENSITY IN FIRE PRONE AREAS WITHIN THE WILDLAND URBAN INTERFACE WITH THE INCREASE IN PROPERTY VALUES, TAXES, AND THE COST OF BUILDING.

PLUS, THERE IS NOWHERE IN THE STAND THAT MANDATES ANY PERCENTAGE OF NEW UNITS TO BE AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

THIS PLAN CANNOT AND WILL NOT GUARANTEE AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPERS WILL BE THE ONLY WINNERS WITH THIS TO, WITH THIS ASSAULT TO OUR CITY AS THEY ARE THE ONLY ONES WHO CAN AFFORD TO BUILD MULTIPLE UNITS ON A LOT.

THIS EXTREME RESTRUCTURING OF AUSTIN HOUSING AFFECTING THOUSANDS OF HOMEOWNERS SHOULD NOT BE DETERMINED BY ONLY 11 CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS.

IT SHOULD BE VOTED ON EVERYONE IT AFFECTS.

REMEMBER THE OLD SAYING, IT'S ALL ABOUT QUALITY, NOT QUANTITY.

DON'T THROW AWAY THE QUALITY OF LIFE WE ALL ENJOY AND THAT PEOPLE MOVE HERE FOR, FOR THIS MASSIVE PLAN THAT WILL DESTROY THE AUSTIN WE LOVE.

MAKE THE RIGHT DECISIONS FOR YOURSELVES, FOR YOUR AUSTIN.

DO NOT VOTE IN THIS PROPOSAL TODAY.

RESPECT THE FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOM FOR ALL TO VOTE ON THIS PLAN THAT AFFECTS THE FUTURE OF THEIR PROPERTY.

THANK YOU.

ANDY COCO.

HELLO, UH, MY NAME IS ANDY COCO, DISTRICT ONE.

I APPRECIATE COUNCIL MEMBER POOLE STATED INTENT, YOU'RE RIGHT THAT SOMETHING MUST BE DONE.

UH, YOU STATED THAT YOU WANT AUSTIN TO BE A SPECIAL PLACE FOR GENERATIONS TO COME AND WE SHARE THAT DREAM.

SO IN LOOKING FORWARD, ARE YOU VISIONING MOSTLY MIDDLE AND HIGHER INCOME PEOPLE? ARE YOU THINKING ONLY OF NEWCOMERS BECAUSE I'M BOOKENDED ON EITHER SIDE OF THIS CALL BY MULTI-GENERATIONAL AUSTINITE WITH HOPE FOR THE OPTION TWO, AND FRANKLY, THEIR RIGHT TO REMAIN OFFITE ABSENT REAL DEMOCRATIC PUBLIC PROCESS.

AND THANKS FOR TWO MINUTES TODAY INSTEAD OF ONE.

TODAY'S WHAT WE'VE GOT.

THESE WISE FOLKS ARE SAYING POSTPONE AND THEY ACTUALLY GET POLICY.

AND THEY'RE TELLING YOU THAT THIS INITIATIVE AS WRITTEN IS NOT IT.

EVEN WITH AMENDMENTS, THE DATA I'VE SEEN DOES NOT KEEP OUR COMMUNITIES TOGETHER.

AND SAFE DISPLACEMENT CAN LOOK LIKE THE NIGHTMARE IN PALESTINE.

AND SOMETIMES IT'S QUIETER AND WELL-INTENTIONED, BUT STILL UNJUST.

LIKE THESE CODE CHANGES BY THE WAY, TIMES TO CEASEFIRE RESOLUTION AFTER CODE NEXT AND SMART GROWTH.

IF YOU COUNSEL FOLKS WANNA PLANT YOUR LEGACY AS A FORCE FOR GOOD RATHER THAN MARKED BY EVEN MORE UNPRECEDENTED, SHAMEFUL DISPLACEMENT.

HERE ARE THE PEOPLE.

THESE ARE THE FOLKS WHO RUN THE CITY ONE.

DEEP AFFORDABILITY.

FIRST TWO, POSTPONE THE VOTE.

THREE MORE PUBLIC PROCESS.

THIS IS A HUGE CHANGE.

FOUR, PRIORITIZE THE VOICES OF THE MOST DEEPLY AFFECTED PEOPLE, NOT BUSINESSES.

THE PEOPLE MAKE UP.

AUSTIN AND DEVELOPER BUSINESSES ARE NOT PEOPLE.

WHAT'S BEST FOR LOW INCOME? AUSTINITE IS WHAT'S BEST FOR AUSTIN.

I'D LIKE TO ASSUME YOUR INTENTIONS ARE GOOD, BUT MY MOM ALWAYS SAID THE ROAD TO HELL IS PAVED WITH GOOD INTENTIONS.

THANK YOU.

TES ORTEGA.

HELLO, CAN YOU HEAR ME? YES.

UM, HI.

MY NAME IS CHRIS ORTEGA.

I AM IN DISTRICT FOUR.

I'VE BEEN LIVING IN AUSTIN FOR ABOUT, UH, 10 YEARS NOW.

AND I HAVE SEEN OVER THE YEARS PRICES CONTINUE TO INCREASE.

UH, I'VE SEEN FRIENDS HAVE TO MOVE OUT OF THE CITY, UM, TO FIND MORE AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

UH, MY SIBLING HAS STRUGGLED WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR SEVERAL YEARS AND DEALT WITH HOUSING INSTABILITY.

UM, WHAT I'VE SEEN OF THIS INITIATIVE, IT DOES NOT ACTUALLY, UH,

[01:00:01]

SOLVE FOR THE PROBLEM THAT AUSTIN HAS, WHICH IS NOT A HOUSING SHORTAGE, BUT IN FACT AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING SHORTAGE.

AND TO BE CLEAR, A DEEPLY AFFORDABLE HOUSING SHORTAGE.

UM, LEAVING, UH, DEVELOPERS TO DECIDE PRICING, LEAVING IT UP TO MARKET RATES IS NOT GOING TO RESULT IN AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

UM, WE SEE SMALL LOTS BEING PRICED AT THE SAME, UH, PRICE AS, UM, LARGER SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, ALL OF WHICH ARE UNAFFORDABLE NOT ONLY FOR LOW INCOME FOLKS, BUT FOR, UH, MIDDLE CLASS FOLKS AS WELL.

UM, I'M ASKING FOR THE COUNCIL TO POSTPONE THE VOTE TO, UH, ALLOW FOR MORE PEOPLE OF AUSTIN, ESPECIALLY LOW INCOME, IMPACTED PEOPLE OF COLOR TO BE ABLE TO HAVE THEIR PUBLIC INPUT, UM, AND BE ABLE TO COME TO THE TABLE AND HELP COME UP WITH A SOLUTION THAT ACTUALLY MAKES SENSE AND HELPS.

UH, AUSTIN, UH, PLEASE POSTPONE, UH, THE VOTE ON THIS INITIATIVE, UM, TO MAKE ROOM FOR A SOLUTION THAT ACTUALLY IS IN FAVOR AND HELPS SUPPORT, UH, LOW-INCOME FOLKS IN AUSTIN TO AFFORD, BE ABLE TO AFFORD THEIR HOUSING, STAY IN THEIR HOUSING, UH, AND NOT BE CONTINUED TO BE PUSHED OUT AS WE'VE SEEN, UH, FOR MANY YEARS THUS FAR.

THANK YOU.

NEXT SPEAKER IS THERESE CROCKER.

GOOD MORNING.

THIS IS THERESE CROCKER.

UH, I'M THE CHAIRMAN OF THE TEXAS FEDERATION OF WOMEN'S CLUB, WHICH IS HOUSED IN THE MANSION OF 2312 SAN GABRIEL.

MY SEVEN REASONS FOR OPPOSITION TO THIS ARE NUMBER ONE, A NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT, WHICH REDUCES THE QUALITY OF LIFE DUE TO OVERPOPULATION IN A CONFINED AREA.

STRESS TO THE AQUIFERS, TRUST, DEMAND, ANIMAL AND REMAINING TREE LIVES.

THERE'S DESTRUCTION OF TREES AND VEGETATION TO ACCOMMODATE BUILDINGS AND DRIVEWAYS WILL GREATLY REDUCE AIR QUALITY, CLIMATE IMPROVEMENT, WATER CONSERVATION, SOIL PRESERVATION, AND WILDLIFE HABITAT.

IT ALSO REDUCES THE SHADE THAT NATURALLY INSULATES HOMES, UH, CAUSING INCREASED ENERGY CONSUMPTION.

NUMBER TWO, DECREASED SAFETY AND SECURITY AND HAVE ADVERSE EFFECTS ON PUBLIC SAFETY AND THE BURDEN TO POLICE FORCE, FIRE AND RESCUE SERVICES, TRASH COLLECTION AND OTHER SERVICES.

NUMBER THREE, INHIBITION OF MEDICAL EMERGENCY SERVICES.

FIRE AND RESCUE SERVICES AND TRASH COLLECTIONS.

THE GREATLY INCREASED PARKING ALONG STREETS WILL INHIBIT AUSTIN CITY SERVICES SUCH AS EMERGENCY MEDICAL AND FIRE AND RESCUE, UH, CAUSING DANGER TO CITIZENS.

AND NUMBER FOUR, STRESS AND OVERLOAD TO EXISTING UTILITIES.

MAJOR STRESS WILL BE ON ALL OF THE UTILITIES OF WATER, GAS, ELECTRICAL, AND INTERNET CAPABILITIES.

UM, COST OF IMPROVING UTILITIES TO MEET THE INCREASED NEED WILL NEED TO BE BUDGETED AND PAID FOR AND COST TO THE CITIZENS OF THEIR TIME, MONEY, AND CONVENIENCE TO LIVE WITH THE WORK NEEDED FOR UPGRADES IS UNFAIR TO EXISTING RESIDENTS.

NUMBER FIVE, EXACERBATION OF THE EXISTING PARKING CRISIS AND STREET TRAVEL.

MULTIPLE RE RESIDENCES WILL INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF CARS ON ALREADY VERY CROWDED STREETS CAUSING EVEN MORE HAVOC TO TRAVEL AND TIME MANAGEMENT.

SIX, REDUCTION OF PROPERTY VALUES FOR CURRENT HOMEOWNERS.

UM, REDUCTION IN CITY TAX REVENUE DUE TO THE POSSIBILITY OF ONLY ONE LANDOWNER FOR MANY LOT, UH, MANY FROM MANY RESIDENTS ON ONE LOT WHO MAY NOT EVEN BE TAX PAYING CUSTOMERS.

NUMBER SEVEN, TREMENDOUS COST TO TR RECENT RESIDENTS AND TAXPAYERS.

TAX INCREASES ARE GONNA HAVE TO HAVE COVER THE COST OF NON-PERMANENT RESIDENTS.

ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES WILL BE NEEDED, THE COST OF A LOSS, A LOSS OF INCOME FOR BUSINESSES THAT REQUIRE AUTO AND TRAVEL AND PARKING.

LOSS OF QUALITY OF LIFE FOR EXISTING TAX, TAX PAYING CITIZENS AND LOSS THE .

THANK YOU SPEAKER.

YOUR TIME HAS EXPIRED.

PLEASE VOTE NOTE TO PHASE ONE AND TWO.

MARIO.

A GOOD AFTERNOON.

COUNCIL, I'M FROM DISTRICT FIVE.

PLEASE DO NOT SIDE ON THE WRONG SIDE OF HISTORY.

WE ARE PLEADING NOT TO CONTINUE WITH THE HOME ACT DENSITY DOES NOT EQUATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

AND THERE'S NO GUARANTEE FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN THIS ACT.

THERE IS NO CORRELATION IN CONTRAST.

THIS ACT DOES NOT CONSIDER INFRASTRUCTURE, LOGISTICS, WASTE, PLUMBING, PARKING, AND YOU'RE HEARING THE MARAD OF INFORMATION AND LOGISTICAL NIGHTMARES THAT WILL COME IN THE LONG TERM.

ALL THESE WILL BECOME YOUR PROBLEMS. ALL THESE WILL BECOME OUR PROBLEMS IMMEDIATELY.

THIS IS NOT AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

CONSIDER THE LONG TERM AND ACKNOWLEDGE THE DEMOGRAPHICS WHO

[01:05:01]

ARE FOR AND AGAINST THIS ACT.

THIS ACT IS NOT FOR US.

THIS WILL NOT GIVE US OPTIONS OR SUPPORT HOUSING SOLUTIONS.

SEEK ALTERNATIVES POSTPONED.

LOOK FOR MORE INPUT FROM THE COMMUNITY BECAUSE THEY ARE BEING VERY LOUD.

NOW LISTEN, AS A CHAIR OF SEVERAL COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS, WE IMPLORE YOU TO PLEASE CONSIDER AND NOT BE ON THE WRONG SIDE OF HISTORY.

THE FUTURE IS IN YOUR HANDS.

THE COMMUNITIES ARE LOUD RIGHT NOW, AND I THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION.

BARB, BARBARA EPSTEIN.

OH, HELLO.

MY NAME IS BARBARA EPSTEIN.

I LIVE IN DISTRICT NINE, NORTH OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS.

I'M ASKING YOU TODAY TO STEP BACK AND RETHINK YOUR PLAN.

WHY IS YOUR CURRENT HOME INITIATIVE THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF THE 2020 RESOLUTION THAT WOULD'VE FUNDED LOW INTEREST LOANS TO BUILD ADUS REQUIRED TO BE AFFORDABLE AND PROHIBITED AS SHORT-TERM RENTALS? HAVING WORKED IN ELDER LAW FOR 21 YEARS, I WAS STARTLED THAT A A RP ENDORSED THE CURRENT PLAN.

I THOUGHT THAT A A RP SUPPORTED SENIORS AGING IN PLACE, NOT DEVELOPMENT, PRESSURING THEM TO LEAVE PAID FOR HOMES.

I DOUBT THAT YOU EXPECT THIS INITIATIVE TO RESULT IN TRULY AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

AFTER READING ABOUT COUNCIL MEMBER RYAN ALTER'S INVOLVEMENT BUILDING 18 CONDOS AND SEEING ONE ADVERTISED FOR $596,000.

THE HOME INITIATIVE PREMISE IS THAT IF WE JUST BUILD MORE PRICES WILL GO DOWN.

BUT NOTHING YOU DO TO THE ZONING CODE WILL REDUCE LAND PRICES.

WHEN PEOPLE BUILD MORE UNITS, THE VALUE OF LAND GOES UP.

SO DO THE NEIGHBORS.

SO EVERYONE'S LAND TAXES WILL GO UP, GIVING OWNERS NO INCENTIVE TO LOWER RENT OR SALES PRICE.

THE ONLY WAY TO REDUCE LAND PRICES IS FOR YOU TO USE THE COMMUNITY LAND TRUST PROGRAM TO PURCHASE LAND.

ELIMINATING LAND PRICE IN THE EQUATION.

IF OCCUPANCY LIMITS END RESULTING IN CONSTANT CONSTRUCTION NOISE, OVERCROWDING PARKING, AND GARBAGE PROBLEMS, RAT INFESTATIONS, A LOT OF SENIORS ARE GOING TO FEEL FORCED TO MOVE, BUT THEY'LL HAVE FEW OPTIONS.

THE CURRENT RATE FOR ASSISTED LIVING IN AUSTIN IS $6,000 A MONTH PRIVATE PAY SINCE THE AUSTIN AREA IS THE FASTEST GROWING AREA IN THE ENTIRE COUNTRY.

FOR SENIORS, IF YOU THINK YOU HAVE A HOMELESS PROBLEM NOW YOU SHOULD THINK TWICE BEFORE UNLEASHING UNFETTERED HOUSING MARKET FORCES HERE.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

KYRA HILL.

HELLO? CAN YOU HEAR ME? YES.

OKAY.

UH, HELLO.

MY NAME IS KYRA HILL.

I'VE GROWN UP IN TEXAS, BEEN HERE MY WHOLE LIFE.

I LIVE IN DISTRICT ONE AND I'M HERE TO SPEAK AGAINST THE HOMES INITIATIVE.

I ACTUALLY RENT IN A TRIPLEX WHERE TWO OF THE THREE UNITS ARE OWNED BY LANDLORDS WHO COLLECT OUR RENT AS PASSIVE INCOME.

THEY WERE INITIALLY BUILT AS NEW CONSTRUCTIONS AND MARKETED AS MORE AFFORDABLE SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING.

YET A MAJORITY OF THE TRIPLEXES BUILT ON OUR STREET LIKE OURS ARE NOT USED AS PRIMARY RESIDE, WHICH IS NO DOUBT WHAT HOMES INITIATIVE WILL REPLICATE IF PASSED.

LIKE THE REST OF AMERICA.

AUSTIN, TEXAS DOES NOT HAVE A HOUSING SHORTAGE.

WE HAVE AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING, QUOTE UNQUOTE SHORTAGE THAT IS MANUFACTURED BY INVESTOR GREED.

IN 2023, AN ESTIMATED 27% OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY HOMES WERE PURCHASED BY INVESTORS IN THE UNITED STATES THAT JUST OVER 22 MILLION HOMES PURCHASED BY LANDLORDS AND RENTED OUT FOR EXORBITANT PRICES OR LIKE THE TRIUS NEXT DOOR TO US LEFT VACANT FOR OVER SEVEN MONTHS BECAUSE THE LANDLORD WOULD NOT LOWER THE RENT TO A REASONABLE PRICE BY NOT ADDING ANY STIPULATION TO THE HOME INITIATIVE, ENSURING THAT THE PEOPLE IN NEED OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING RECEIVE IT.

THE CITY COUNCIL WILL DO NOTHING FOR THE WORKING CLASS PEOPLE OF AUSTIN, BUT CREATE EVEN MORE PASSIVE INCOME FOR INVESTORS SELLING OUT OUR COMMUNITY TO A PIECE OF RICH BY PUTTING EVEN MORE MONEY IN THEIR POCKETS.

THANK YOU.

ARTHUR WITTENBERGER.

HELLO, MY NAME IS ARTHUR LICHTENBERGER AND I LIVE IN THE HOLLY NEIGHBORHOOD.

I WANT TO THANK THE STAFF FOR ALL THE SUPPORT THEY'VE PROVIDED IN THIS PROCESS.

I SUPPORT THESE PROPOSED CHANGES AS A COUNTRY AND AS A CITY.

UM, WE HAVE DUG A WHOLE OVER DECADES BY NOT ENCOURAGING HOUSING AND IT'S GONNA TAKE TIME TO FIX IT, BUT

[01:10:01]

THIS PROPOSAL IS A GREAT STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION TO PROVIDE MORE SUPPLY OF HOUSING TO OUR CITY.

PEOPLE HAVE SAID THAT IT DOES NOTHING FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING, BUT THERE IS NOTHING UNIQUE ABOUT THE HOUSING MARKET.

IT'S SUPP SUPPLY AND DEMAND DRIVEN BY, UM, UH, VOTING IN FAVOR OF THIS PROPOSAL WILL INCREASE THE SUPPLY THAT WE NEED TO HAVE HOUSING BECOME AFFORDABLE.

AND IT'S NOT A SILVER BULLET, BUT WE NEED TO SOLVE THESE TYPES OF PROBLEMS WITH MANY LED BULLETS.

AND I THINK THIS IS A GREAT START.

IF WE DON'T DO THIS, WE'RE GONNA LOSE THE CHARACTER OF OUR CITY BY PUSHING LONGTIME RESIDENTS OUT, HURT YOUNG FAMILIES AND FACE INCREASING PROBLEMS THAT INEQUALITY ACCELERATES.

I ENCOURAGE THE COUNSELORS TO VOTE IN FAVOR OF THIS PROPOSAL AND LET'S LEGALIZE HOUSING AND SET UP OUR CITY FOR GENERATIONS TO COME.

THANK YOU.

PAULA BROWN.

GOOD MORNING.

CAN YOU HEAR ME? YES, PLEASE PROCEED.

OKAY, THANK YOU.

I'M SPEAKING IN OPPOSITION TO THE HOE UH, INITIATIVE IS CURRENTLY WRITTEN.

IT WILL NOT BENEFIT LOW INCOME MIDDLE INCOME STUDENTS AND SENIORS WHO ARE ALL STRUGGLING TO CONTINUE TO LIVE THE GOOD LIFE IN AUSTIN.

I DO APPRECIATE SOME OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS, BUT I ASK THAT THE VOTE TODAY BE POSTPONED BECAUSE THIS HAS NOT HAD ENOUGH OUTREACH FROM THE CITY COUNCIL, UH, OR OTHER AREAS INTO THE COMMUNITIES, IT WILL IMPACT THE MOST.

THIS INITIATIVE HAS BEEN RUSHED THROUGH AND WILL HAVE DIRE CONSEQUENCES TO CURRENT RESIDENTS OF AUSTIN.

WE WILL WIND UP PAYING FOR EVERYTHING IN THIS INITIATIVE SO DEVELOPERS CAN DEVELOP MORE EXPENSIVE HOUSING THAT LOW INCOME MIDDLE INCOME STUDENTS AND SENIORS CANNOT AFFORD.

I AGREE THAT SOMETHING TO BE DONE, BUT NOT A BLANKET CITYWIDE INITIATIVE AS HOME IS CURRENTLY WRITTEN.

OUR CURRENT INFRASTRUCTURE, THE WATER FIRE, ELECTRIC GAS, UM, AND TRASH COLLECTION CANNOT SUPPORT OUR CURRENT HOMES AND DEVELOPMENT AND BUSINESSES MUCH LESS BE ABLE TO SUPPORT OUR DOUBLING OUR, OUR TRIPLING THE STRESS ON THESE SYSTEMS THAT ARE OVER 50 YEARS TO 75 YEARS OLD IN SOME OF OUR MOST DENSELY, MOST POPULATED RESIDENTIAL, UH, AREAS OF AUSTIN IN THE CENTER SUCH AS DISTRICT NINE WHERE I LIVE.

UH, PREMISE FOR BUILDING WILL TAKE EVEN LONGER AND COST EVEN MORE.

IT'S INCOME.

MIDDLE INCOME.

PEOPLE WHO ARE LIVING IN HOUSES NOW WHO THINK THEY'RE GONNA BUILD AN A UD, UH, IS ARE NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO DO THAT FOR PROBABLY LESS THAN 200,000 WHEN YOU GO THROUGH THE ENTIRE PROCESS WITH THE COST OF CONSTRUCTION AND PERMITTING AND TIME AND UH, CONTRACTING.

UM, IT WILL ALSO INCREASE RESPONSE TIMES FOR EMS FIRE AND POLICE DUE TO VEHICLES BEING PARKED IN ALREADY OVERCROWDED STREETS AND BLOCKED STREETS.

IN SOME CASES IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD WE HAVE STREETS WHERE FIRE TRUCKS CANNOT EVEN GET DOWN THE STREET BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE PARKED ON EITHER SIDE.

YOU CAN'T EVEN GET A SMALL VEHICLE DOWN THE STREET.

I THANK YOU.

THANK SPEAKER.

YOUR TIME HAS EXPIRED.

DEB, DR. DEBORAH MURPHY.

DR. MURPHY, PLEASE UNMUTE.

UH, HELLO.

MY NAME IS DR. MURPHY.

I HAVE FAMILIAL ROOTS IN, UH, AUSTIN ETHOS IN GOING BACK THREE GENERATIONS I LIVE IN D ONE, I OPPOSE PLANS THAT CONTINUE TO DISPROPORTIONATELY INCREASE THE DENSITY IN EAST AUSTIN, THE TRAFFIC BURDEN, THE RISKS IN THE EVENT OF A DISASTER, AND THE DECREASE OF OUR QUALITY OF LIFE.

WE IN EAST AUSTIN ARE A PART OF THE ORIGINAL HISTORY OF AUSTIN AND NO PLANS SHOULD GO FORWARD WITHOUT THE INPUT OF THE ACTUAL RESIDENTS OF THIS COMMUNITY.

INCLUDED.

THE ORIGINAL EAST AUSTIN IS BURSTING AT THE SEAM.

IT HAS BEEN DISPROPORTIONATELY OVERDEVELOPED WITHOUT A CLEAR TRANSPORTATION PLAN OR A DISASTER PREPAREDNESS PLAN.

WE ARE ALREADY TRAPPED IN OUR NEIGHBORHOODS DURING RUSH HOUR, SO I SHUDDER TO THINK WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF WE HAD AN EVEN WORSE NATURAL DISASTER THAN THE RECENT HAILSTORM THAT CAUSED $600 MILLION WORTH OF DAMAGE CITYWIDE THE ORIGINAL SAW, SUSTAINED EXTENSIVE DAMAGES AND WE ARE YET TO RECEIVE MEDIA ATTENTION, ALTHOUGH MUELLER NORTH WAS AND VILLE ARE ALWAYS MENTIONED, AND THIS IS EVEN AFTER REACHING OUT AND FOR HELP UP AND DOWN THE CHAIN OF ELECTED OFFICIALS.

THIS IS JUST ONE OF MANY EXAMPLES OF THE CONTINUED OVERLOOKING OF EAST AUSTIN CONCERNS WHERE LAND IS THE ONLY GENERATIONAL WEALTH THAT MANY RESIDENTS HAVE TO PASS ON TO THE NEXT GENERATION.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

BRANDY BURTON.

[01:15:02]

GREETINGS, COUNCIL MEMBERS.

UM, AS YOU KNOW, I GREW UP HERE IN AUSTIN.

I'M VERY INVOLVED IN THE CITY AND I LOVE THE CITY AND I AM A HUGE PROPONENT OF DIVERSITY OF HOUSING TYPES AND SIZES.

I WELCOME ALL KINDS OF HOUSING IN OUR NEIGHBORHOODS.

AS A LONGTIME ADVOCATE FOR CO-HOUSING, I HAVE LIMITS ON UNRELATED PEOPLE ON A PROPERTY.

UM, I ALSO BELIEVE THAT COMPACT DEVELOPMENT WILL HELP OUR TRANSIT SYSTEM FLOURISH.

HOWEVER, THERE IS A REGRETTABLE LACK OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONS OR PLANNING FOR UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES AND NO REQUIREMENTS FOR AFFORDABILITY IN EXCHANGE FOR THE ADDITIONAL ENTITLEMENTS.

I'M AFRAID THAT DOING THIS BLANKET ONE SIZE FITS ALL WILL NOT ONLY UNDERCUT ANY BARGAINING CHIPS, WE HAVE TO NEGOTIATE FOR MORE AFFORDABILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONS, BUT IT WILL CAUSE MASSIVE DISPLACEMENT, SIGNIFICANT LOSS TO OUR URBAN TREE CANOPY LEADING TO MORE FLOODING PEA ISLAND EFFECT AND OVERRUN OUR UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE.

WE CAN'T MAINTAIN OUR TREE CANOPY.

IF HERITAGE TREES, WHICH ARE THE ONLY 5% OF OUR TREES ARE PROTECTED, WHICH ARE 19 INCHES AT ABOVE.

IF WE DON'T PUT IN PLACE PROTECTIONS OR REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE TREES THAT ARE EIGHT TO 18 INCHES, WE'LL DRASTICALLY REDUCE OUR URBAN CANOPY AND INCREASE OUR HER HEAT ISLAND EFFECT AT A TIME.

THAT CLIMATE CHANGE IS ALREADY IMPACTING OUR CITY DEEPLY WITH EXTREME HEAT AND WEATHER.

SPECULATIVE DEVELOPMENT DOESN'T LEAD TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

I WANNA SEE SMART, CAREFUL INFILL.

THIS PROPOSAL IS WAY LESS NUANCED THAN PREVIOUS ATTEMPTS, WHICH HAVE BEEN MENTIONED INCLUDING CODE NEXT.

UM, FOR THAT REASON, I REQUEST THAT YOU DELAY THIS UNTIL AFFORDABILITY.

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND INFRASTRUCTURE CAPACITY PLANNING CAN BE BUILT INTO IT.

I TRACK THE NECESSARY TRANSITION TO OUR ELECTRIC, ELECTRIFYING OUR VEHICLES AND HOMES.

IF WE MULTIPLY THE NUMBER OF HOMES TO THREE HOMES PER LOT IN THIS PHASE AND UP TO NINE IN THE NEXT PHASE, THE ASSOCIATED UTILITY DEMAND PER TRANSFORMER WILL MUSHROOM.

AND EVEN THEN, IF EACH ONE OF THOSE HOMES HAS JUST ONE ELECTRIC VEHICLE WHICH DRAWS ABOUT THE EQUIVALENT ENERGY OF THE HOME, WE WON'T BE ABLE TO HAVE THE SPACE OR CAPACITY TO CHARGE AND ACCOMPLISH ALL OF THIS.

I'M DEEPLY CONCERNED THAT PROCEEDING WITH THIS POLICY WITHOUT A CONCURRENT SIGNIFICANT DRAINAGE UPGRADE OR REQUIREMENTS OF ON ONSITE WATER CAPTURE WILL HAVE EVEN MORE FLOODING AND DAMAGE TO PROPERTY AND LOSS OF LIFE IN DIFFERENT PARTS OF OUR TOWN.

THANK YOU.

SPEAKER, YOUR TIME HAS EXPIRED AT ALL IN AREAS IT'S DRAINAGES MEG DAVIS.

GOOD MORNING MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND EFFORTS FOR OUR CITY.

I JUST WANTED TO VOICE MY NEIGHBORHOOD'S OPPOSITION TO THE HOME INITIATIVE.

I'M PRESIDENT OF MILLWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION IN DISTRICT SEVEN.

A POLL OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD SHOWED A MAJORITY WERE OPPOSED.

I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT THAT THE MEDIUM AGE OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD IS PRETTY YOUNG AS IT SURROUNDS A MILITARY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL WITH LOTS OF YOUNG FAMILIES FIND IT THE RIGHT PLACE TO START THEIR LIVES.

TO MAKE THIS BROAD SWEEPING CHANGE, ESPECIALLY ON THE HEELS OF CODE NECKS BEING BOWED DOWN BY OURS RESIDENTS IS CONCERNING TO US.

WE DON'T SEE THE DATA THAT SHOWS THE BENEFIT TO MIDDLE INCOME HOUSING WOULD OCCUR.

IN ADDITION, WE WOULD LIKE TO ASK FOR A FEW CHANGES TO BE CONSIDERED.

ONE, PLEASE.

EXEMPT AREAS THAT HAVE DEEDED RESTRICTIONS IN PLACE AS THE NEIGHBORS WITHIN THOSE AREAS SIGN THEIR DEEDS WITH UNDERSTANDING OF THOSE RESTRICTIONS.

AT THE TIME, DEEDED RESTRICTIONS ARE PERSONALLY ENFORCED AT A LARGE COST AND TIME COMMITMENT TO THE OWNERS IN THOSE AREAS.

IF THE HOME INITIATIVE CHANGES THE AREA ZONING TO ALLOW AN INCREASE IN THE UNITS FOR SSF TWO AND SSF THREE ZONING, THEN IT WILL CREATE COSTLY, UNNECESSARY LITIGATIONS TO FALL IN THE RESIDENTS OF THOSE AREAS AND THE COURT SYSTEM.

TWO, PLEASE CONSIDER STRONGER PRESERVATION INCENTIVES TO DISCOURAGE DEVELOPERS FROM MOWING DOWN THE OLDER, MORE AFFORDABLE CURRENT HOUSING TO REPLACE THE NEWER AND MORE EXPENSIVE HOUSING THAT DOES NOT MATCH THE LOOK AND FEEL OF THE AREA.

IN ADDITION, THIS WOULD HELP PERFECTLY FINE, BUT OLDER HOMES STAY OUTTA THE LANDFILL.

NUMBER THREE, PLEASE CONSIDER ADDING A SHORT TERM RENTAL RESTRICTIONS SO NEIGHBORHOODS DON'T FILL WITH SHORT-TERM PEOPLE AT THE EXPENSE OF COMMUNITY BEING LOST.

THIS SHOULDN'T BE A PROBLEM IF WE ARE LOOKING TO ACCOMMODATE MIDDLE INCOME FAMILIES.

OUR NEIGHBORHOOD HAS EXPERIENCED BAD ACTORS IN THE STR AREA AND IT MAKES LIVING NEAR THEM VERY TOUGH AT TIMES.

WE MOVED INTO OUR COMMUNITY BECAUSE OF THE DETAILS THAT MADE UP THAT COMMUNITY AND WE FELT THE CITY OFFICIALS AND THE DEEDS RESTRICTIONS AND TIMES WOULD HELP US PRESERVE THAT.

THANK YOU.

SPEAKER, YOUR TIME HAS EXPIRED.

FRONT YARD.

THANK YOU.

XIA MARTINEZ.

UM, HELLO EVERYONE.

UH, GOOD MORNING.

ONE MOMENT PLEASE.

HI, MY NAME IS XIA MARTINEZ.

UM, I'M A 27-YEAR-OLD HISPANIC WOMAN.

I HAVE LIVED IN AUSTIN FOR NINE YEARS NOW

[01:20:01]

AND I CONSIDER AUSTIN MY HOME.

THE REASON I'M CALLING IS IN OPPOSITION TO HOME.

I'VE BEEN A RENTER SINCE DAY ONE AND BECAUSE OF JUST, UH, FINANCIAL AND HEALTH ISSUES, I HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO BUY A HOME.

UM, I'VE BEEN TACKLING STUDENT LOAN DEBT AND MEDICAL DEBT FOR YEARS NOW.

THE FACT THAT THIS PLAN IS LIKELY TO DRIVE PROPERTY TAXES, UH, MAKES ME THINK THAT I MAY NEVER BE ABLE TO AFFORD A HOME IN AUSTIN.

IT'S NOT AFFORDABLE FOR, UM, MIDDLE CLASS INCOME PEOPLE AND PEOPLE LIKE ME.

UM, I LOVE LIVING HERE.

I HAVE LOVED ONES HERE.

MY JOB IS HERE AND I'D LOVE TO HAVE A HOME HERE AT AT SOME POINT.

I'M NOT THE ONLY PERSON WHO FEELS THIS WAY.

HOW MANY PEOPLE HAVE ALREADY BEEN DISPLACED UNDERCURRENT LOSS AND REGULATIONS? I CURRENTLY EARN ABOUT 60,000 AND ABOUT A FOURTH OF MY INCOME GOES TO MY DEBTS.

CITY COUNCIL GAVE IT, GAVE ITSELF A RAISE.

MAYBE Y'ALL CAN AFFORD TO LIVE HERE NOW, BUT A LOT OF US WILL NOT BE ABLE TO IF THIS PASSES.

I WONDER HOW MUCH MONEY FORCE THE FORCE WAS BEHIND HOME ARE CONTRIBUTING TO YOU GUYS' CAMPAIGNS.

HOPEFULLY YOU GUYS CAN KEEP THIS IN MIND.

RESPECTFULLY SEND YOU PETER.

GOOD AFTERNOON, COUNCIL MEMBER FIRST.

THANK YOU.

CITY STAFF.

UM, I LIVE WITH MY FIANCE AND OUR 4-YEAR-OLD SON IN MONTOPOLIS ON THE CITY'S EASTERN CRESCENT DISTRICT THREE.

IT'S A BEAUTIFUL, THRIVING COMMUNITY AND ONE OF THE CITY'S MOST DIVERSE.

MANY OF MY NEIGHBORS HAVE LIVED HERE PEACEFULLY FOR GENERATIONS AND DEEPLY AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

I'M ASKING YOU TO PLEASE JOIN MY NEIGHBORS ON THE OVERWHELMING AMOUNT OF AUSTINITES FROM ALL WALKS OF LIFE WHO'VE SPOKEN IN OPPOSITION OR ASKED FOR A POSTPONEMENT AND A VOTE.

I'M SURE YOU'RE ALREADY FAMILIAR WITH AUSTIN'S NOT SO GREAT TRACK RECORD ON LAND USE, ESPECIALLY THE IMPACT ON THE EASTERN CRESCENT.

STILL, IT SEEMS WE'RE REPEATING OURSELVES BY IGNORING THE DIRECT REQUEST OF THIS CITY'S MOST VULNERABLE RESIDENTS WHO CONTINUE ASKING FOR SPECIFIC PROTECTIONS WHILE STATED INTENTION OF HELPING MIDDLE INCOME PEOPLE WITH AFFORDABILITY.

SOUNDS NOBLE.

THE PROMISE IS JUST TOO VAGUE WITHOUT PROTECTIONS IN PLACE.

HOW DO WE KNOW THE PROFITS WILL, UM, BE, UH, SHARED WITH HOME BUYERS AND NOT, UH, SORT OF CONSUMED BY THE UM, DEVELOPERS? UH, I KEEP HEARING THAT THE AIM OF THE GOAL OF THIS INITIATIVE IS TO HELP MIDDLE INCOME PEOPLE, BUT NOTHING SEEMS TO GUARANTEE THIS AFFORDABLE, UH, HOUSING.

THE INIT, THE INITIATIVE ALSO DOESN'T REASONABLY ADDRESS THE NEEDS OF PEOPLE WHO WILL BE DISPLACED BY IT.

THE HOUSING DEPARTMENT'S REPORT ON AFFORDABILITY MAKES CLEAR THE SPECULATIVE DEVELOPMENT IN THIS, UM, IS, IS THE CAUSE OF THE RUNUP IN HOME PRICES AND, AND NOT ZONING RESTRICTIONS.

SO WHY ARE WE IGNORING THAT? UM, WHY NOT DEAL WITH THE ROOT CAUSE DIRECTLY? IF SPECULATIVE DEVELOPMENT IS THE CAUSE OF THE CURRENT CONDITIONS, THIS CAN'T BE THE SOLUTION.

UH, THE HOME INITIATIVE IS SUPPOSED TO INCENTIVIZE SPECULATIVE DEVELOPMENT AND IT SEEMS LIKE WISHFUL THINKING THAT TO BELIEVE THAT DEVELOPERS WILL SHARE THE PROFITS FROM THE REDUCED CONSTRUCTION COSTS OR THAT SOMEHOW THE SUPPLY SIDE WILL EVENTUALLY TRICKLE DOWN TO FUTURE GENERATIONS.

THE HOUSING DEPARTMENT'S REPORT ALSO INDICATES THAT PROPERTY TAXES AND DISPLACEMENT WILL LIKELY ACCELERATE AS A RESULT OF THE MEASURE FURTHER AGGRAVATING THE DISPLACEMENT OF AUSTIN'S MOST VULNERABLE.

I'D LIKE TO KEEP MY NEIGHBORS PLEASE, SO PLEASE DON'T DO THIS.

IT SOUNDS LIKE THE PEOPLE LOBBYING FOR THIS INITIATIVE ENVISION A UTOPIA WITHOUT CARS AND WITH EVERYONE LIVING ON TOP OF EACH OTHER.

THANK YOU.

I PERSONALLY DON'T WANT THIS AND I DOUBT THIS GOAL WILL BE ACHIEVED.

THANK YOU.

SPEAKER, YOUR TIME HAS EXPIRED CONSIDERATION OF DEREK INE.

HELLO.

THANK YOU COUNSEL FOR GIVING ME THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK THIS MORNING.

I'M LUCKY ENOUGH TO HAVE BEEN, UH, BE A HOMEOWNER IN DISTRICT ONE FOR THE PAST NINE YEARS.

UNFORTUNATELY, I KNOW WE WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN ABLE TO AFFORD THIS HOME FOR 2023 PRICES.

SO I JUST, I SIMPLY WANTED TO REITERATE THAT WE KNOW THE ABILITY TO BUILD MORE HOUSING IS INDEED PROVEN TO LOWER HOUSING PRICES AND ESPECIALLY IN CONJUNCTION WITH TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT.

THIS WILL HELP US REDUCE EMISSIONS.

ALSO, I APPRECIATE THIS BEING A CITYWIDE APPROACH AND NOT LIMITED TO THOSE AREAS WHERE THERE AREN'T POWERFUL NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS TO OPPOSE TO THOSE WHO OPPOSE.

I AM ALSO GENUINELY CURIOUS WHAT YOUR SOLUTION IS INSTEAD OF INCREASING HOUSING SUPPLY TO THOSE WHO OPPOSE THIS BASED ON HOW IT'LL AFFECT YOU AS A HOMEOWNER.

LET ME JUST SAY THE HOME INITIATIVE IS A WIN FOR PROPERTY OWNER RIGHTS.

YOU ARE NOW ALLOWED TO IMPROVE AND INVEST YOUR PROPERTY EVEN MORE THAN BEFORE.

PROPERTY OWNER RIGHTS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT YOUR NEIGHBOR IS OR ISN'T ALLOWED TO BUILD ON THEIR PROPERTY.

I CAN'T THINK OF TWO BIGGER PRIORITIES FOR THIS COUNCIL THAN TACKLING AFFORDABILITY CRISIS AND DOING OUR PART TO FIGHT AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE.

SO THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR LEADERSHIP IN MODERNIZING OUR LAND USE CODE

[01:25:01]

THROUGH THE HOME INITIATIVE.

BRIAN BISHOP, THANK YOU.

MY NAME IS BRIAN BISHOP.

I'M A HOMEOWNER IN DISTRICT THREE AND BORN AND RAISED IN THE AUSTIN AREA.

I'M CALLING IN FAVOR OF THE HOME INITIATIVE.

UM, YOU KNOW, WHEN I THINK ABOUT WHERE DO CITIES COME FROM AND WHAT IT'S ALL ABOUT, IT'S, IT'S ABOUT PEOPLE.

IT'S A LOT OF VERY HARD WORKING PEOPLE TO MAKE A CITY.

UH, SO AT THE END OF THE DAY, CITIES ARE ABOUT PEOPLE.

WHETHER WE LIKE IT OR NOT, PEOPLE ARE COMING TO AUSTIN.

UH, THEY LIKE WHAT WE'RE SELLING HERE FOR ONE REASON OR ANOTHER, WE SHOULD MAKE MORE OF IT.

WE NEED TO MAKE MORE ROOM FOR MORE PEOPLE.

AND IF WE WANNA DO THAT, IF WE WANNA WELCOME MORE PEOPLE AND MORE BUSINESSES AND MORE FAMILIES TO AUSTIN, THEN WE NEED TO MAKE ROOM FOR THAT AND WE NEED TO PLAN FOR GROWTH.

THANK YOU.

IAN ERTA? HEY.

OH, HEY.

UH, YOU CAN HEAR ME? YES, YES, YES.

OKAY.

I WAS JUST GOING TO SAY THAT I FIRST AND FOREMOST AM IN OPPOSITION TO THIS, UH, AMEND OR THE HOME INITIATIVE.

MANY OF THE REASONS OR STUFF ALREADY STATED SUCH AS HEAT ISLAND EFFECT BEING GREATLY INCREASED, UH, DUE TO THIS EXPONENTIALLY.

UH, WE SHOULD ALSO BE REDUCING NEW CONSTRUCTIONS OVERALL, UH, A KD GROWTH MOVEMENT AS I WOULD IF ANYBODY REMEMBERS THAT.

UM, I JUST ALSO WANT TO SAY THIS IS QUITE A LAND GRAB.

SMALL HOUSES HONESTLY WILL BECOME JUST AS EXPENSIVE AS THE, THE THE LARGER ONES IN YEARS TO COME.

THIS IS JUST A WAY TO SQUEEZE MORE MONEY OUT OF A LOT, UH, AND IT STILL RAISES RATES.

THE TRAFFIC IS GOING TO STILL CONTINUE TO GET WORSE WITH THIS.

AND ON TOP OF THAT, YEAH, I WOULD SAY ALSO TO THE FRONT YARD ARGUMENT, PUSHING THE FRONT YARD BACK AND REDUCING YOU, YOU KNOW, THE DRIVEWAY THAT DOESN'T SOLVE HEAT ISLAND, THAT STILL MAKES IT WORSE BECAUSE THE ROOFTOP.

SO THE ARGUMENT THAT, AND YOU KNOW, THE FRONT Y UH, FRONT YARD BEING SHRANK, IT'S GONNA REDUCE HEAT ISLAND.

THE FACT THAT HONESTLY IS NIL.

SO ANYWAYS, UM, I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO SAY THAT ONE OF THE PEOPLE IN SUPPORT OF THIS IS ONE OF MUSK'S, JUST TO MAKE SURE WE'RE ON THE SAME PAGE HERE.

GRIMES IS IN SUPPORT OF THIS ONE OF, UH, MUSK'S, UH, GIRL, UH, GIRLFRIENDS AT THE TIME.

AND, UH, IT INDEED SEEMS TO BE IN LINE OF KIND OF THIS HAVEN CONQUER, UH, HAD IDEALISM.

SO YEMM, I'D STRONGLY SUGGEST DROPPING THIS, NOT DOING IT OR YES, PUT IT TO A VOTE.

UM, THANK YOU.

JOHN GUTIERREZ? YES, I'M HERE.

PLEASE GO AHEAD.

UH, OKAY.

YEAH, SO I'M A MEMBER OF DISTRICT FIVE, UH, CITY MEMBER.

UH, UM, I AM OPPOSING HOME THE HOME INITIATIVE BECAUSE THERE'S NO GUARANTEED AND INTENTIONAL AFFORDABILITY REQUIREMENTS WITH THIS INITIATIVE.

HOUSELESSNESS IS A HUGE PROBLEM THE CITY'S ALREADY FACING.

GENTRIFICATION IS A HUGE PROBLEM THE CITY'S ALREADY FACING.

THERE'S AN INCREASING HIGH COST OF LIVING.

AUSTIN IS BECOMING A CITY FOR RICH PEOPLE, FOR THE ELITES IN MANY WAYS, AND COMMUNITIES OF COLOR ARE BEING PRICED OUT CONTINUALLY AND HAVE BEEN FOR THE PAST 10 YEARS.

I WANNA ALSO NOTE TOO, THAT THE PEOPLE WHO ARE PROPOSING THIS ARE THE NOEX FAMILY THAT COMES FROM SILICONE VALLEY.

UM, THEY ARE BILLIONAIRES.

UH, THEY TRIED TO PASS THIS TO GET FUNDED AND, AND PASS THROUGH THE STATE LEGISLATOR BEFORE COMING INTO THE CITY OF AUSTIN.

UM, AND YEAH, IT'S, IT'S REALLY LIKE AGAIN, WHO IS, WHO IS IN IN SUPPORT OF THIS? WHO IS PUSHING THIS? UH, AND THEN AGAIN, WHO IS THIS FOR? I ALSO WANNA POINT OUT WHO THAT LESS THAN 1% OF THE 20 23, 20 24 BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF AUSTIN IS INCLUDED AND ALLOTTED IN OUR GENERAL FUND FOR HOUSING 0.9, LESS THAN 1%.

SO MY ASK TO CITY COUNCIL AND TO THE MAYOR AND TO STAFF IN GENERAL IS THAT WE NEED TO BE ALLOTTING HIGHER AMOUNT OF OUR CITY BUDGET FOR HOUSING AS

[01:30:01]

A, AS A HUGE INTEREST, UH, SOMETHING AT THE FOREFRONT OF OUR PLANNING AND BUDGETING FOR THE CITY.

THIS IS NOT THE WAY TO GO AND I PLEASE, PLEASE ASK US TO RECONSIDER THIS.

UH, THERE ARE AMENDMENTS FROM COMMUNITY POWERED A TX AND FOR THAT AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS TRUSTED TRACK RECORDS THAT CARING AND SUPPORTING FOR COMMUNITY.

THANK YOU.

SPEAKER, YOUR TIME HAS EXPIRED EVERYBODY.

MATTHEW ATKINSON.

YES.

HI, MY NAME'S MATTHEW ATKINSON.

I'M A RESIDENT OF DISTRICT NINE.

I SUPPORT HOME AND I COMMEND THE COUNCIL FOR TAKING ON THIS CONTROVERSIAL ISSUE.

I THINK THE MAJORITY OF AUSTINITES SUPPORT, AFFORDABILITY, DENSITY AND PRESERVATION AS LONG AS IT'S NOT IN THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD.

THE PROBLEM IS WHEN YOU ACT LIKE WITH THIS TYPE OF ULAR THINKING, THE CITY AS A WHOLE SUFFERS.

I BUILT A GARAGE APARTMENT LAST YEAR AND IT'S GREAT.

MY TENANT IS GREAT, SHE'S NOW PART OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE RENTAL INCOME ALLOWS ME TO AFFORD LIVING IN CENTRAL AUSTIN.

WE'RE GOING TO HEAR A LOT OF OBJECTIONS TODAY ABOUT FIRE SAFETY, LACK OF INFRASTRUCTURE, AND ABOUT DRAINAGE ISSUES.

ALTHOUGH I SOMETIMES QUESTION THE MOTIVE OF THESE OBJECTIONS, I JUST TO STAY UNFOCUSED AND REMEMBER THAT THE PROPOSED HOME AMENDMENTS DO NOT CHANGE OR SUPERSEDE THE FIRE CODE.

THE HOME AMENDMENTS DO NOT CHANGE CURRENT AND PREVIOUS COVERAGE OR DRAINAGE REG REGULATIONS.

YES, OUR INFRASTRUCTURE WILL NEED TO BE SLOWLY UPGRADED AS MORE DENSITY ADDED.

HOWEVER, THIS IS MUCH MORE EFFICIENT IN BUILDING NEW INFRASTRUCTURE AT THE OUTSKIRTS OF THE CITY.

ADDITIONALLY, THE INFRASTRUCTURE AND UPGRADES ARE PAID FOR BY THE ADDITIONAL UNITS VIA PERMIT FEES, IMPACT FEES, TAX FEES, PROPERTY TAXES, AND UTILITY PAYMENTS.

AGAIN, COUNSEL, THANKS FOR THANKS FOR YOUR TIME AND THANKS FOR THIS ISSUE.

PAN ARIF, PLEASE UNMUTE VICKY SPRADLIN.

YES, THIS IS A DANGEROUS TROJAN HORSE BRINGING PERMANENT DAMAGE TO OUR CITY.

THE OUTSIDE IS BENIGN AND DECORATED WITH THE DESIRES FOR JUSTICE, EQUITY AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING, EVEN VOWS OF PROTECTING THE CLAIMANT.

BUT INSIDE THIS TROJAN HORSE ARE GREEDY, BILLERS, DEVELOPERS, REALTORS, INVESTORS, SPECULATORS, WAITING TO SPRING OUT AND BEGIN RAPING OUR CITY FOR PROFIT.

THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT ANY OF THE ADVERSE EFFECTS LISTED, UH, ON STREET PARKING, TRAFFIC, IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE, UH, VIOLATIONS, LEADING FLOOD ISSUES, LOSS OF TREES.

YES, BUILDERS CUT DOWN TREES 'CAUSE THEY SAY IT'S JUST THE COST OF DOING BUSINESS.

THEY JUST PAY THE FINE.

THERE'S SOCIAL STRESS FROM INCREASED DENSITY AND MOST CLEARLY IT'S BREAKING THE BACKS OF OUR ALREADY OVERWHELMED CITY SERVICES.

E-M-S-A-P-D, FIRE AND UTILITIES.

THERE'S NOTHING IN THESE PLANS ADDRESSING ANY OF THESE ADVERSE EFFECTS AND NO ONE IS TELLING YOU ABOUT THE INCREASE ON LAND VALUES THAT WILL INEVITABLY COME.

OUR PROPERTY TAXES WILL GO THROUGH THE ROOF BECAUSE OF THIS AND WHO WILL BE DRIVEN OUT? SENIORS, MINORITY COMMUNITIES.

MAYBE THE GOVERNMENT WILL UH, BE GLAD TO HAVE, UH, THE FAT OR TAX BASE, BUT UH, THE PEOPLE WHO BENEFIT THE MOST OR THE PROPER TIER WHO WILL LOSE FOLKS LIKE ME WHOSE HOUSE STRUCTURE IS ACTUALLY, UH, TAXED AT ZERO VALUE 'CAUSE IT'S A FALL DOWN, BUT I PAY TAXES ON OVER A MILLION DOLLAR, UH, LAND SITTING UNDER MY HOUSE.

UM, THIS IS GONNA BECOME EVEN MORE VALUABLE AND TAXABLE IF THREE HOUSES CAN BE REPLACED BY ONE AND THE PROFITEERS CAN GET MORE MONEY.

UM, THE PEOPLE ON THIS OUT WHO ARE COVERING THE OUTSIDE OF THIS TROJAN HORSE INCLUDES SOME WHO KNOW WHAT THEY'RE DOING.

PAID LOBBYIST, COUNCIL MEMBERS WHO'VE ACCEPTED CAMPAIGN DONATIONS.

SADLY, THOUGH MANY ARE WELL-INTENTIONED FOLKS SEEKING SOCIAL JUSTICE AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING, BUT WHOSE NAIVETE HAS BEEN HIJACKED AND AIDING AND ABETTING THE PROFITEERS BEHIND THESE PROPOSED CHANGES.

THESE CHANGES ARE GONNA FORCE MANY OF US OUT OF OUR HOMES THAT WE'VE LIVED IN FOR A LIFETIME.

SENIORS AND MINORITY COMMUNITIES WILL BE THE MOST DISPLACED, BUT SIMPLY SUPPLY AND DEMAND A LOT YOU CAN BUILD THREE HOUSES ON IS WORTH MORE THAN YOU CAN ONE BUILD ONE HOUSE ON.

SO THE LOT VALUE WILL INCREASE ALONG WITH THE TAXES ON IT, WITH A LOT COSTS.

MORE FOLKS HAVE TO BUILD MORE EXPENSIVE HOUSES ON IT TO RECOUP THEIR INVESTMENT.

NOBODY IS GONNA BUILD CHEAP HOUSES ON HIGH PRICED LAND.

AND EVEN IF Y'ALL, YOU KNOW ABOUT A COMPLIMENT, UH, ECONOMICS IS COMING FROM MONOPOLY.

YOU KNOW, THE PROPERTY WITH THREE HOUSES CAN CHARGE YOU MORE THAN ONE THAN ONE THAT JUST HAS ONE HOUSE.

NO AFFORDABLE HOUSING IS GUARANTEED FROM THESE CHANGES.

THERE'S GONNA BE IMMENSE PROFITS FOR ALL INVOLVED IN THE BUILDING DEVELOPING INVESTING GROUP.

THANK YOU.

THERE'LL BE A DESTRUCTION OF THE OPTIONS FOR SEEING THANK, THANK YOU SPEAKER.

YOUR TIME HAS EXPIRED.

I'M SAYING IS JACQUELINE O'KEEFE.

HELLO.

UM, I AM HOPING THAT YOU CAN HEAR ME.

WE CAN.

UM, VERY GOOD.

[01:35:01]

UM, I JUST WANT TO ECHO SEVERAL PEOPLE WHO ALREADY SPOKEN HERE TODAY.

UH, RUM, BARBARA EPSTEIN, BRANDY BURTON.

THEY'VE SPOKEN PRETTY ELOQUENTLY ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENTAL STRESSES, THE UNINTENDED AND UNSOUGHT OUT CONSEQUENCES THAT WE ARE INCURRING.

THE LACK OF COOPERATION WITH THINGS LIKE COMMUNITY LAND TRUST TO DO A BETTER JOB AND A JOB THAT IS, THAT IS ACTUALLY GUARANTEED TO PRODUCE THE EFFECTS THAT WE WANT.

I THINK THE BIGGEST THING THAT WE ARE FACING HERE IS THAT WE ARE IN AGREEMENT WITH YOU ON THE GOALS OF HOME.

WE JUST THINK THESE MECHANISMS ARE TOTALLY WRONGHEADED AND THAT YOU ARE SO CERTAIN YOU ARE DOING SOMETHING WONDERFUL, BUT YOU ARE MAKING A, A CONSEQUENTIAL CHANGE WITH, WITHOUT UH, TAKING CARE OF A LOT OF THE DETAILS WHICH WILL, WHICH WILL GUARANTEE CONSEQUENCES YOU DO NOT WANT.

THANK YOU.

BYE.

THANK YOU KAREN FERNANDEZ.

GOOD MORNING COUNCIL MEMBERS.

MY NAME IS KAREN FERNANDEZ.

I'M THE CURRENT PRESIDENT OF THE MATTHEWS LANE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION LOCATED AT DISTRICT FIVE.

WE DO SHOULD NOT SUPPORT THE HOME PROPOSAL AS IT DOES NOT GUARANTEE AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND WILL PUSH OUT MORE OF OUR NEIGHBORS WHO ALREADY STRUGGLE TO PAY THEIR EVER INCREASING PROPERTY TAXES.

WE DO SUPPORT AMENDMENTS AS PUT FORTH BY THE AUSTIN NEIGHBORHOOD COALITION, GAVA AND JE.

WE HAVE SEEN THIS TRICK BEFORE WHERE DEVELOPERS TARGET LOW AND MIDDLE INCOME COMMUNITIES FOR THEIR CENTRAL LOCATED PROPERTIES AND RECRUIT WELL-MEANING NEIGHBORS AND ADVOCATES WITH PROMISES OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING THROUGH DENSITY, WHICH NEVER HAPPENED.

WE LEARNED THE HARD WAY THAT THE INTENTION WAS NEVER TO KEEP THE DIVERSITY OF THE NEIGHBORHOODS AND SIMPLY PROVIDE MORE HOUSING OPTIONS.

THE LAND WAS DEVELOPED IN THE OFTEN GENERATIONAL INHABITANTS PRICED OUT FOR GOOD.

EVERY ONE OF YOU WHO VOTES FOR THIS ORDINANCE AS IS SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELVES.

WE'RE IGNORING THE VOICES OF YOUR CONSTITUENTS.

THE TEACHERS, ARTISTS, HEALTHCARE SERVICE WORKERS AND TRADESMEN WHO BUILT AUSTIN HAVE BEEN MOVED OUT AND THEIR MODEST HOME BULLDOZED TO BE REPLACED BY SOULLESS BOXES.

MANY OF THEM SIMPLY INVESTMENTS FOR THE MONEY CLASS, NOT A FOREVER HOME FOR A FAMILY.

IF YOU REALLY CARE ABOUT HOUSING FOR MIDDLE INCOME FAMILIES, YOU WOULD ELIMINATE THE SPRS AND YOU WOULD ALLOW THE ADDITION OF AN A DU FOR HOMESTEAD PROPERTIES WITH TAX INCENTIVES AND LOAN PROGRAMS MAKING THAT ADDITION AN ATTAINABLE GOAL FOR THE AVERAGE HOMEOWNER.

YOU SHOULD ALSO RESPECT EXISTING DEED RESTRICTIONS IN NEIGHBORHOODS RATHER THAN PUTTING THE FINANCIAL BURDEN OF THE ON THE HOMEOWNERS TO ENFORCE.

FINALLY, I WOULD ASK THAT EVERYONE WHO IS NOT YET VIEWED STEVE MEN'S DOCUMENTARY SOME DIVIDE AND CONQUERED THE REALITIES OF HOME TO DO SO QUICKLY SO THAT YOU HAVE AN IDEA OF WHO'S REALLY BEHIND THIS PUSH.

I ASK THAT YOU NOT VOTE ON HOME TO POSTPONE IT AND TO BE MORE INCLUSIVE WITH WHO IS INVOLVED IN LOOKING AT SOLUTIONS FOR PROVIDING HOUSING FOR THE MIDDLE INCOME AND LOW INCOME OF AUSTIN.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

JORDAN BIRD.

GOOD MORNING.

CAN YOU HEAR ME? YES.

THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK AGAINST THE HOME INITIATIVE.

I'M A DISTRICT FOUR RESIDENT AND SEVERAL MEASURES INCLUDED IN HOME ARE ALARMING AND HAZARDOUS TO HUMAN HEALTH AND SAFETY.

IN JANUARY THIS YEAR, I LOOKED OUT OUR WINDOW TO SEE BLACK SMOKE COMING OUT OF THE HOUSE NEXT DOOR.

A HOUSE THAT FREQUENTLY HAS EIGHT OR MORE SHORT-TERM RENTAL OCCUPANTS IN IT.

I WAS SCARED AND CONCERNED FOR THE INDIVIDUALS INSIDE ALL OF WHOM ARE LOW INCOME, MANY OF WHOM ARE DISABLED.

FIVE FIRE TRUCKS, DOZENS OF FIRST RESPONDERS BATTLING THE FLAMES.

MY NEIGHBORS AND I LATER FOUND OUT THIS WASN'T THE FIRST TIME THIS BOARDING HOUSE CAUGHT ON FIRE THIS SUMMER.

ANOTHER SHORT-TERM RENTAL HOUSE ALSO CAUGHT ON FIRE IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.

AT THAT FIRE A RESIDENT AND SEVERAL FIREFIGHTERS WERE INJURED AND HAD TO GO TO THE HOSPITAL.

THE HOME MEASURE TO REMOVE THE LIMIT ON UNRELATED ADULTS PER DWELLING UNIT IS AN EXTREMELY DANGEROUS PROPOSITION GIVEN HOW HAZARDOUS MANY OF THESE HOMES ARE WITH THE CURRENT LIMIT OF EIGHT UNRELATED INDIVIDUALS PER UNIT.

WHAT DOES MORE THAN UN EIGHT UN UNRELATED PEOPLE PER LOT AND NO RESTRICTIONS ON RVS LOOK LIKE TODAY IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD IN NORTH AUSTIN.

BED BUGS, RATS, FAULTY WIRING, PEOPLE SLEEPING IN GARAGES, CLOSETS, TENTS AND SHEDS WITH LIMITED ACCESS TO POWER, WATER, HEAT AND COOLING, ALL WITH LITTLE TO NO ENFORCEMENT FROM THE CITY.

DOES THAT SOUND SAFE TO YOU? ONE WEALTHY INVESTOR FAMILY OWNS 20 OF THESE SHORT-TERM RENTAL HOMES IN NORTH AUSTIN.

DOES THAT SOUND AFFORDABLE AND ACCESSIBLE TO YOU? THAT'S TODAY.

IMAGINE HOW BAD THE CONDITIONS WILL BE FOR THESE INDIVIDUALS LIVING IN A FUTURE STATE WITH NO LIMIT ON THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE PER UNIT OR ARVS SHELTERS.

THESE MEASURES BENEFIT WEALTHY INVESTORS AND DO LITTLE TO IMPROVE ACCESS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

WHAT THEY WILL DO

[01:40:01]

IS CREATE CONDITIONS THAT ARE UNSAFE FOR INDIVIDUALS STAYING IN THESE UNITS.

AND FOR THE AUSTIN COMMUNITY AS A WHOLE, I'VE EXPRESSED THESE CONCERNS TO COUNCILMAN BELLA AND NOW TO YOU AND EXPECT YOU TO VOTE NO ON THE HOME INITIATIVE.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

TRENTON HENDRICKSON.

HELLO, MY NAME IS TRENT HENDRICKSON, A LONG TIME AFFORDABILITY ADVOCATE IN VOTER DISTRICT FIVE.

I'M HERE TO URGE THE CITY COUNCIL TO POSTPONE THE VOTE ON HOME AND HAVE A SERIOUS DIALOGUE WITH COMMUNITY GROUPS LIKE GAVA AND COMMUNITIES FOR COLOR UNITED.

BEFORE CREATING ANOTHER GENTRIFICATION METS GENERATION OF GENERATIONS OF AUSTINITES WILL BE AFFECTED BY, I GUESS YOU HAVEN'T HAD THE TIME TO READ THE CITY'S OWN STAFF REPORT ON HOME.

THEY CONCLUDED THE MASSIVE INCREASES IN HOME PRICES WERE THE RESULT OF LAND SPECULATION, NOT A SHORTAGE IN IN SUPPLY, AND THAT A MARKET-BASED APPROACH WOULD CONTINUE ESCALATING HOME PRICES.

IF YOU WANT AFFORDABILITY, YOU NEED AN AFFORDABILITY REQUIREMENT.

FULL STOP FURTHER.

YOUR STAFF CAUTIONED HOME COULD INCREASE TAXES ON HOMEOWNERS AND INCENTIVIZE DISPLACEMENT OF RENTERS, ESPECIALLY IN MARGINALIZED COMMUNITIES.

YOU ARE RUSHING THROUGH LAWS IN EARLY DECEMBER THAT YOUR OWN RESEARCH CAN'T JUSTIFY.

SHE IS NOT THE SEASON FOR SHADY PROFIT DRIVEN POLITICS UP THE BREAKS AND START WORKING WITH YOUR COMMUNITY AGAIN.

HAPPY HOLIDAYS, NICOLE MANN.

UM, GOOD MORNING CITY COUNCIL.

MY NAME IS NICOLE MANN.

I'M A RESIDENT AND HOMEOWNER IN DISTRICT NINE.

I'M A TEACHER IN .

I HAVE A YOUNG SON WHO IS STARTING SCHOOL NEXT, NEXT YEAR.

UM, I AM CALLING AN OPPOSITION TO THE HOME INITIATIVE BECAUSE I DO NOT BELIEVE IT WILL BE HELPFUL IN CREATING AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

IT WILL BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE LOCAL ENVIRONMENT AND COMMUNITIES.

IT WILL OVERWHELM OUR ALREADY STRUGGLING UTILITIES OF WATER, ENERGY, AND WASTE MANAGEMENT HOME WILL LIKELY FURTHER DRIVE UP OUR LAND VALUES, WHICH TRANSLATES INTO HIGHER COSTS FOR THE CURRENT RESIDENTS THAT ARE ALREADY STRUGGLING TO KEEP UP WITH OUR INCREASING PROPERTY TAXES.

THE TREND IN AUSTIN HAS BEEN THAT MOST NEW DEVELOPMENTS ARE FOR INVESTMENT AND NOT FOR HOME HOMEOWNER OCCUPIED PROPERTIES.

HOME IS LIKELY ONLY GOING TO EXPAND THE REACH OF DEVELOPERS AND WILL CONTINUE CONTINUE TO PUSH MIDDLE AND LOWER INCOME RESIDENTS FARTHER OUT OF THE CITY BECAUSE LET'S BE REAL INDIVIDUALS, COUPLES, FAMILIES, WE CANNOT COMPETE FINANCIALLY AGAINST THESE DEVELOPERS AND LARGE INVESTMENT FIRMS. ULTIMATELY, I WOULD LIKE TO SEE YOU THE CITY COUNCIL PRIORITIZE HOME OWNERSHIP OVER HOUSING AS INVESTMENTS.

I WOULD LIKE TO SEE YOU, THE CITY COUNCIL, FIND CREATIVE WAYS TO ENSURE THAT HOUSING SALES ARE MADE ACCESSIBLE TO US TEACHERS, POLICE, FIRST RESPONDERS, NURSES INSTEAD OF DEVELOPERS AND INVESTORS.

AS A RESIDENT OF THIS INCREDIBLE CITY, I HAVE BEEN HERE FOR ALMOST TWO DECADES.

I AM IN SUPPORT OF THOUGHTFUL AND INCLUSIVE DENSIFICATION.

NOT A SWEEPING ONE.

SIZE DOES NOT FIT ALL INITIATIVE.

PLEASE VOTE NO.

THIS IS A FIRST DRAFT THAT NEEDS TO BE REEVALUATED.

THANK YOU.

BROKEN UP INTO SMALLER PIECES.

THANK YOU SPEAKER.

YOUR TIME HAS EXPIRED TAKEN ON ONE PIECE AT A TIME.

ALENE BAKER ALENE.

ALENE BAKER, PLEASE UNMUTE.

JOYCE BASCIANO.

HOW DO I UNMUTE? YOU'RE WE CAN HEAR YOU PLEASE.

WE CAN HEAR YOU.

PLEASE GO AHEAD.

CAN YOU HEAR ME? YES MA'AM.

OH, SORRY.

.

GOOD MORNING.

I'M JOYCE BASCIANO.

I'M A HOMEOWNER AND I LIVE IN DISTRICT 10 AND I OPPOSE BOTH PHASES OF THE HOME INITIATIVE.

THIS ISN'T PLANNING IT'S PLUNDERING HOME WILL CHANGE THE NUMBER OF UNITS ALLOWED IN SINGLE FAMILY ZONING TO THE NUMBER OF UNITS CURRENTLY ALLOWED IN MULTIPLE FAMILY ZONING FOR 175,000 SINGLE

[01:45:01]

FAMILY ZONE PROPERTIES.

BY ALLOWING THESE ADDITIONAL UNITS AND SINGLE FAMILY ZONING BY RIGHT, THE CITY CIRCUMVENTS THE STATE'S NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT THAT IS TRIGGERED BY A NORMAL ZONING CHANGE TO AVOID CONFUSION AND IN FAIRNESS TO THE PUBLIC, LET'S LEAVE THE EXISTING SINGLE AND MULTIPLE FAMILY ZONING CATEGORIES AS IS AND CREATE MISSING MIDDLE ZONING CATEGORIES THAT A PROPERTY OWNER CAN APPLY FOR USING THE EXISTING ZONING CHANGE PROCESS, THE HOME INITIATIVE COULD EASILY ENCUMBER RATHER THAN EMPOWER MIDDLE INCOME PROPERTY OWNERS.

OUR PROPERTY TAXES ARE BASED ON THE HIGHEST POSSIBLE USE OF OUR LAND HOME.

INCREASES THAT USE THIS WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL BURDEN ON THOSE WITH A FIXED INCOME, PARTICULARLY SENIOR CITIZENS WHO WANT TO AGE IN PLACE.

ACCESSORY DWELLINGS CAN ALREADY BE BUILT ON SF THREE ZONE PROPERTIES, BUT THEY ARE VERY EXPENSIVE TO BUILD.

SO HOME WILL BE USED BY THOSE WITH THE FINANCIAL RESOURCES TO REMOVE AN EXISTING HOUSE TO BUILD MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING.

THIS WILL INCREASE LAND SPECULATION AND WILL ACCELERATE DISPLACEMENT, PARTICULARLY IN THE EASTERN CRESCENT.

THE RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS CALLED OUT FOR IN PHASE TWO SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE BEFORE PHASE ONE WAS PROPOSED.

ITEM G OF MAYOR WATSON'S MOTION SHEET ONE VERSION TWO CALLS FOR A COMPARISON OF THE DATA METRICS IN HIS MOTION UP TO THREE YEARS PRIOR TO THE ENACTMENT OF HOME.

IF DONE BEFORE PHASE ONE, IT WILL PROVIDE A SNAPSHOT OF THE CITY THAT WILL HELP US LOCATE APPROPRIATE SITES FOR MISSING MIDDLE HOUSING IN ALL 10 COUNCIL DISTRICTS.

THANK YOU SPEAKER.

YOUR TIME HAS EXPIRED THE VOTE ON THE HOME IN GWEN ROW.

GWEN, PLEASE UNMUTE LYDIA ZAMAN.

HI, MY NAME IS LYDIA ZAMAN.

I'M AN ATTORNEY, A REAL ESTATE AGENT AND A REAL ESTATE INVESTOR.

I EVEN OWN AIRBNBS, WHICH IS SOMETHING THAT MAKES ME INCREDIBLY UNPOPULAR AND EVEN I CAN TELL THAT HOME IS AN ABSOLUTE DISASTER FOR THE CITY.

WHEN LOOKING AT IT WITH EVEN A VIEWING A MODICUM OF BALANCE, ONE COMES TO THE CONCLUSION THAT THIS WILL NOT CREATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

THE SIMPLE SOLUTION IS THAT WHY NOT MAKE IT A REQUIREMENT FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING? AND THE OBVIOUS ANSWER IS THAT THE INTENTION OF THIS IS NOT TO CREATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

THE INTENTION OF THIS IS TO BENEFIT THE DEVELOPERS AND TO BEN BENEFIT THE CAREERS OF OUR CITY COUNCIL, WHO APPARENTLY DOES NOT CARE.

WHAT ITS CONSTITUENTS WANT IS THE COUNCIL HAS RECEIVED THOUSANDS OF LETTERS.

OPPOSING THE COUNCIL HAS RECEIVED THOUSANDS OF CALLS.

THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE HERE SPEAKING TO OPPOSE, AND YET THEY DON'T CARE.

EVEN ON THE SCREEN, I CAN SEE YOU SHOVELING YOUR PAPERS, WALKING OUTTA THE ROOM ON YOUR PHONES.

AND YOU KNOW WHY? BECAUSE THE DECISION HAS ALREADY BEEN MADE.

YOU DON'T CARE WHAT YOUR CONSTITUENTS WANT.

YOU HAVE SUBSTITUTED YOUR JUDGMENT FOR THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE ELECTED YOU.

YOU'RE PASSING THIS THROUGH DURING THE BUSIEST HOLIDAY SEASON OF THE YEAR, MUCH LIKE YOU DID WITH THE BMU COMPATIBILITY AND THE STATES.

PLEASE, PLEASE DOWN DAVID FOUTS.

HELLO.

THANK YOU.

MY NAME IS DAVID FOUTS AND I SUPPORT THE HOME INITIATIVE BECAUSE IT WILL MAKE AUSTIN MORE AFFORDABLE.

BUT, UH, WHAT I'D LIKE TO SPEAK ABOUT IS WHY SO MANY PEOPLE THINK IT WON'T AND WHY THEY ARE MISTAKEN.

THIS SUMMER, KUT RELEASED A REALLY GREAT PODCAST ABOUT AUSTIN HOUSING MARKET CALLED GROWTH MACHINE.

IN EPISODE SIX, PROFESSOR SARAH, UH, UH, BROIN OF CORNELL UNIVERSITY EXPLAINS THAT SCHOLARLY RESEARCH HAS SHOWN IN STUDY AFTER STUDY THAT MORE WHEN MORE HOUSING IS BUILT, THE LOWER PRICES TEND TO BE, AND THAT AREAS WITH LESS RESTRICTIVE ZONING THAT ENABLES MORE HOUSING TO BE BUILT, DON'T SEE PRICES INCREASE AS QUICKLY AS AREAS WITH MORE RESTRICTIVE ZONING.

THIS IS IN LINE WITH BOTH OUR UNDERSTANDING OF ECONOMICS AND THE REAL WORLD EXAMPLES, SUCH AS IN HOUSTON, MINNEAPOLIS, PORTLAND, AND THE RENTAL MARKET HERE IN AUSTIN.

SO WHY DO WE KEEP HEARING THAT HOME EITHER WON'T WORK OR WILL HAVE THE OPPOSITE EFFECT? EPISODE SEVEN OF GROWTH MACHINE PROVIDES SOME VERY INTERESTING INSIGHTS.

SO STAN

[01:50:01]

OF TULANE UNIVERSITY, ANOTHER PROFESSOR HAD A VERY SIMILAR QUESTION.

UH, IN HIS RESEARCH HE FOUND THAT MANY AMERICANS ACTUALLY DON'T SEE A CONNECTION BETWEEN AND THEY REALLY DON'T BELIEVE THERE'S A CONNECTION, UH, BETWEEN HOUSING SUPPLY AND DEMAND AND PRICES.

EVEN THOUGH THIS IS FACTUALLY FALSE, HE HYPOTHESIZED, THIS IS ACTUALLY A VERY SIMPLE MISUNDERSTANDING BECAUSE WHEN PEOPLE SEE MORE HOMES GO UP AND MORE DENSITY, THEY ALSO SEE PRICES GO UP, MISIDENTIFYING THE EFFECT FOR THE CAUSE.

UH, AND HE COMPARED THIS TO PEOPLE THINKING THAT AN EVACUATION CAUSES HURRICANES BECAUSE THEY SEE PEOPLE PACKING UP AND THEN A HURRICANE COMES.

ALTHOUGH THIS WAS A JOKE, THE PROBLEM IS, IS THAT, UM, THIS VERY COMMON AND UNDERSTANDABLE MISCONCEPTION HAS LED US TO FIGURATIVELY SPEAKING BAN EVACUATIONS TO PROTECT OURSELVES FROM HURRICANES.

THANK YOU.

UH, BUT THE PROBLEM IS THAT THANK YOU SPEAKER.

YOUR TIME HAS EXPIRED.

THANK YOU.

BILL SPEEDMAN.

MR. MAYOR? YES, OVER HERE.

UM, AFTER THIS NEXT SPEAKER'S TIME EXPIRES, I HAVE A, A REQUEST PLEASE.

OKAY, THANK YOU.

UM, HELLO, MY NAME IS BILL SPEEDMAN, UH, IN, UH, DISTRICT SEVEN.

UM, HOME IS NO SILVER BULLET REDUCING LOT SIZE HAS IN FACT CONTRIBUTED TO INCREASING HOME VALUES AND GROWING PROPERTY TAXES IN AUSTIN AND MANY OTHER CITIES LIKE HOUSTON AND PORTLAND.

TO THINK THAT OUR CITY COUNCIL HAS BEEN ABLE TO FIND A MAGIC SOLUTION TO HOME AFFORDABILITY, WHEN HAS BEFUDDLED THE GREATEST ECONOMIC MINDS IS LAUGHABLE.

THE COMMERCIAL MARKETS DID NOT THRIVE BY PROVIDING AFFORDABILITY.

HOME IS A PLAN TO DISPLACE PEOPLE AND GRAB THEIR LAND JUST AS IT DID MORE THAN A DECADE AGO IN EAST AUSTIN WHERE SIMILAR, UH, OR SMALLER LOTS RESULTED IN A NEARLY COMPLETE DIS UH, DISPLACEMENT OF OFF AUSTIN'S AFRICAN COMMUNITY, UH, AUSTIN'S AFRICAN-AMERICAN COMMUNITY.

WHAT HOME WILL DO IS PROVIDE A BOON FOR DEVELOPERS TO MAKE MONEY.

IT WILL RESULT IN GENEROUS POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS FOR SUPPORTING CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS.

IT WILL DISPLACE THOSE, UH, THAT DO NOT HAVE THE MONEY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THEIR OWN PROPERTY.

IT WILL CONTRIBUTE FURTHER TO THE LOSS OF LOCALLY HOUSED TEACHERS, POLICE AND FIREMEN.

IT WILL RESULT IN LARGE INCREASE OF, UH, IMPERMEABLE CO COVER LEADING TO MORE FLOODING.

IT WILL LEAD TO THE DESTRUCTION OF AUSTIN'S URBAN FORESTS, WHICH CURRENTLY REDUCES SUMMER TEMPERATURES BY 10 OR MORE DEGREES.

IT WILL, UH, STRESS OUR FRAGILE SEWER, WATER AND POWER INFRASTRUCTURE, WHICH ALREADY STRUGGLE TO KEEP UP.

THE CITY COUNCIL AL UH, UH, ALREADY, UH, APPROVES DEVELOPMENTS WHERE STAFF SAYS THAT SEWER CAPACITY IS INSUFFICIENT.

AND FINALLY, WITH, UH, THE MANY THOUSANDS OF YOUR CONSTITUENTS SENDING IN PROTESTS AGAINST HOME, I WOULD WARN CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS THAT THEIR POLITICAL FUTURES ARE AT STAKE IF THEY FORCE THIS INITIATIVE THROUGH TODAY WITHOUT REAL COMMUNITY INPUT AND SUPPORT.

PUT THIS ON THE BALLOT.

LET US THE VOTERS DECIDE.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU SIR.

ALRIGHT, I'LL RECOGNIZE COUNCIL MEMBER HARPER MADISON.

THANK YOU.

I'LL, I'LL DIRECT THE FIRST PART OF WHAT I WAS GONNA SAY TO YOU.

YOU DIDN'T HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SERVE ALONGSIDE MY PREDECESSOR WHO, UM, I THINK IS PROBABLY IN OPPOSITION TO HOME.

I WILL IN FACT BE VOTING FOR THE INITIATIVE, BUT MY PREDECESSOR WOULD PROBABLY BE AN OPPOSITION TO THIS.

AND I SAY THAT TO SAY I RESPECT OUR ALL INDEPENDENT INDIVIDUAL OPINIONS ON POLITICS.

WE'RE TALKING POLITICS POLICY, NOT PEOPLE.

UM, DON'T TAKE IT OUT ON THE PEOPLE, TAKE IT OUT ON THE POLICY AND ON THE POLITICS.

UM, AND I'M SAYING THAT TO SAY MY, MY PREDECESSOR TOOK THE OPPORTUNITY TO REMIND US THAT EVERYBODY, EVERYBODY IN THIS ROOM IS JUST A PERSON.

UM, SOME OF THE FOLKS IN THIS ROOM WHO ARE STANDING IN OPPOSITION TO POLICY THAT I WILL BE VOTING FOR, SAY HELLO TO ME AND I SEE YOU IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD AND I SEE YOU AROUND CITY HALL AND I SEE YOU DOWNTOWN.

UM, AND WE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY IN THOSE MOMENTS TO BE FRIENDLY AND KIND TO ONE ANOTHER.

I HATE THAT WE DON'T OPEN COUNCIL MEETINGS ANYMORE WITH A PRAYER.

UM, AND TAKE THAT OPPORTUNITY TO REMEMBER THAT WE ARE, FOR THOSE OF US WHO IDENTIFY AS CHRISTIAN, WE ARE ALL BORN AND RAISED AND MADE IN HIS IMAGE AND CAN TREAT ONE ANOTHER WITH RESPECT AND KINDNESS.

THERE'S NO REASON, THERE'S NO REASON TO TAKE THAT PART OUT OF THIS PROCESS.

I ENCOURAGE, I ENCOURAGE THE PARTICIPATION.

I'D LIKE TO DISCOURAGE ANYTHING THAT COMES ACROSS AS VISCERAL AND NASTY 'CAUSE IT'S NOT NECESSARY.

MY PREDECESSOR WOULD ENCOURAGE US TO DO THIS WHEN WE WANTED TO APPLAUD.

THE REASON FOR THAT IS BECAUSE THERE ARE SO MANY PEOPLE WHO HAVE NEVER DONE THIS BEFORE.

I DON'T WANT THEM TO HAVE TO BE HERE ALL DAY IN ORDER TO TESTIFY.

BUT IF WE HAVE TO WAIT IN BETWEEN EVERY SINGLE SPEAKER FOR THE APPLAUSE

[01:55:01]

TO DECREASE, THEN THAT MAKES IT TAKE LONGER.

WE ALL, WE SIGNED UP FOR THIS JOB FOR US TO HAVE TO BE HERE TODAY AND THEN MAYBE AGAIN TOMORROW AND THEN AGAIN NEXT WEEK.

THAT'S FINE.

I GOT ELECTED FOR THIS JOB.

I'M HERE FOR IT.

I DRANK MY RED BULL, BUT I DON'T WANT PEOPLE WHO DIDN'T ANTICIPATE BEING HERE FOR DAYS TO BE ABLE TO MAKE THEIR CONTRIBUTION, TO NOT BE ABLE TO DO SO BECAUSE OF THE EXTENDED APPLAUSE.

I WOULD LIKE TO ENCOURAGE US TO DO IT SILENTLY SO WE CAN KEEP THE PROCESS ROLLING AND I'LL LEAVE IT WITH THIS, SOME OF THE FOLKS THAT, ESPECIALLY FOLKS WHO ARE STANDING HERE TODAY IN OPPOSITION TO THIS INITIATIVE, SOME OF THE FOLKS WHO ARE CALLING IN, THEY'RE ALONGSIDE YOU.

Y'ALL ARE ALLIES AND WE CAN'T HEAR WHAT THEY'RE SAYING.

I UNLIKE WHAT ONE OF THE PREVIOUS SPEAKERS SAID, I'M NOT SHUFFLING PAPERS.

I'M NOT ON MY PHONE.

I'M NOT WALKING OUT OF THE ROOM BECAUSE I DO THINK IT IS OUR INHERENT OBLIGATION TO HEAR Y'ALL OUT, BUT I CAN'T HEAR THEM BECAUSE YOU'RE TOO LOUD.

SO IF WE COULD AT THE VERY LEAST LET EVERYBODY FINISH THEIR TESTIMONY, I'D LIKE VERY MUCH TO BE ABLE TO HEAR WHAT THEY HAVE TO SAY AND I'LL LEAVE IT AT THAT.

AND IF THERE'S ANY FURTHER CONVERSATION THAT YOU'D LIKE TO HAVE WITH ME OR MY COLLEAGUES OUTSIDE OF WHAT IS CONSIDERED APPROPRIATE DECORUM IN CHAMBERS, PLEASE TAKE THE OPPORTUNITY TO REACH OUT TO US OUTSIDE OF THIS ROOM.

IT'S ALWAYS AN OPPORTUNITY.

THANK YOU FOR ACKNOWLEDGING ME, MR. MAYOR.

AND THANK YOU FOR EVERYBODY PARTICIPATING.

UM, TIS THIS SEASON AND I REALLY, REALLY DO APPRECIATE Y'ALL'S PARTICIPATION.

THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE TODAY.

COUNCIL MEMBER OR DAVIS? HELLO? YES, HELLO.

GO AHEAD PLEASE GO AHEAD.

YES.

UH, GOOD MORNING.

GOOD MORNING MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS.

THIS IS UH, OR DAVIS.

I AM A 39 YEAR RESIDENT AND HOMEOWNER IN ALLENDALE AND I'M AGAINST THIS HOME INITIATIVE PROPOSAL.

I WANT TO PRESERVE THE SINGLE FAMILY ZONING.

THE HOME INITIATIVE PROPOSAL WILL BE HARMFUL BECAUSE OF THE FOLLOWING THREE POINTS.

ONE, THERE IS NO INFRASTRUCTURE TO SUPPORT THE DENSITY YOU WANT FOR EITHER WATER TRAFFIC OR ELECTRICITY.

I HAVE ALREADY NOTICED WATER PRESSURES GOING DOWN.

TWO, THERE WILL BE AN INCREASED RISK OF FIRE FLOODING AND IF HEAT ISLANDS, IF OUR TREES AND GREENERY ARE DESTROYED.

AND THREE, OUR QUALITY OF LIFE WILL GO WAY DOWN IF WE HAVE NO BIRDS OR OTHER WILDLIFE TO ENJOY.

AND FINALLY, I HOPE TO LIVE IN MY HOME FOR THE NEXT 40 YEARS AND WILL BE ABLE TO CONTINUE COMMUNITY SUPPORT, VOLUNTEERISM AND GARDENING.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND YOUR CONSIDERATION.

LARRY AKERS.

YES.

UH, THE HOME INITIATIVE BETRAYS HOMEOWNERS LONGSTANDING TRUST IN THE CITY'S ZONING COVENANTS.

IT WILL RESULT IN HIGHER LAND APPRAISALS AND TAXES FOR RESIDENTS.

THEREFORE SHIFTING TAX BURDEN FROM, UH, COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES TO RESIDENTS.

IT WILL RESULT IN AN EXCESS OF IMPERVIOUS COVER FOR OUR WATERWAYS.

SINCE MOST SF HOMES ARE WELL BELOW ALLOWED LIMITS, BUT REDEVELOPMENT WILL MAX OUT IMPERVIOUS COVER, IT WILL MAKE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS MORE HAZARDOUS AND STRESS ALL ASPECTS OF OUR INFRASTRUCTURE.

IT CONTRADICTS THE NEED TO CONCENTRATE POPULATION ALONG TRANSIT CORRIDORS TO MAKE OUR TRANSIT INVESTMENT VIABLE.

IT DOES NOTHING TO ADDRESS THE ROOT CAUSE OF UNAFFORDABILITY, WHICH IS THE RELENTLESS PURSUIT OF SUBSIDIZED CORPORATE RELOCATIONS TO AUSTIN.

THE BARTON HILLS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION VOTED 45 TO TWO IN OPPOSITION TO HOME.

WHY NOT PUT THE PROPOSAL TO A PUBLIC VOTE AND IMPOSE THE CHANGES ONLY IN DISTRICTS THAT ACCEPT THEM.

BUT IF YOU DO VOTE TO ADOPT, PLEASE LIMIT YOURSELF TO EIGHT VOTES IN FAVOR.

IN ORDER TO HONOR THE MANY INDIVIDUAL PROTESTS THAT HAVE BEEN FILED TO IMPOSE THESE CHANGES OVER SO MANY OBJECTIONS IS AUTHORITARIAN, NOT DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENTS THE LIKE OF WHICH I NEVER THOUGHT I WOULD SEE IN OUR BEAUTIFUL CITY.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

I HUGHES.

HI, MY NAME'S KELSEY HUGHES AND I AM A RENTER IN DISTRICT NINE.

I'M A HOUSING ADVOCATE BECAUSE I READ THE BOOK THE COLOR OF LAW.

I LEARNED HOW SINGLE FAMILY ZONING MINIMUM LOT SIZES AND OTHER REGULATIONS WE'RE NOT DESIGNED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL OR AFFORDABILITY REASONS, BUT TO PURPOSEFULLY ENSURE THAT CERTAIN GROUPS OF PEOPLE ARE EXCLUDED FROM NEIGHBORHOODS BY RESTRICTING HOUSING UNITS AND INCREASING THE AMOUNT OF LAND A PERSON MUST OWN.

IT'S BEEN VERY SUCCESSFUL AT THAT AND IT'S LED TO OUR CURRENT HOUSING CRISIS TODAY CRISIS.

I SUPPORT HOME BECAUSE SMALLER HOMES ARE MORE AFFORDABLE AND REDUCE SUBURBAN SPRAWL.

THANK YOU.

[02:00:04]

DREW DE LOS SANTOS.

HELLO.

HELLO.

GOOD MORNING.

UM, MY NAME IS DREW LOS SANTOS.

I'M WITH AUSTIN COOPERATIVE BUSINESS ASSOCIATION.

I LIVE IN DISTRICT ONE AND SPEAKING NEUTRAL ON THIS INITIATIVE AND IN FAVOR OF ELIMINATING OCCUPANCY LIMITS.

I'VE LIVED IN AUSTIN SINCE I WAS A CHILD.

ONE OF THE REASONS I WAS ABLE TO AFFORD TO STAY IN AUSTIN WAS BY LIVING AT A CO-OP WHERE I LIVED WITH 12 PEOPLE IN A LARGE HOUSE.

WE ORGANIZED OURSELVES TO SHARE HOUSE CO CHORES, FOOD AND EXPENSES IN ORDER TO CUT COSTS.

I STILL LIVE IN A CO-OP TODAY AND IT'S STILL ONE OF THE SAFEST COST EFFECTIVE AND ENRICHING PLACES TO LIVE IN AUSTIN.

AND THAT IS WHY ELIMINATING OCCUPANCY LIMITS IS IMPORTANT FOR CO-OPS.

INTENTIONAL COMMUNITIES AND COOPERATIVES ARE ORGANIZED WAYS FOR WORKING CLASS AND LOW INCOME PEOPLE TO SURVIVE AND WORK TOGETHER TO ADDRESS RISING COST OF LIVING.

IT'S IMPORTANT THAT THIS TYPE OF LIVING STYLE BE RECOGNIZED AND RESPECTED IN THIS PROCESS.

AND IT'S UNFORTUNATE THAT THE OCCUPANCY LIMITS GOT LUMPED IN TO THIS LARGER VOTE WITH HOME BECAUSE WE'VE BEEN WORKING TO ELIMINATE OCCUPANCY LIMITS FOR CO-OPS FOR YEARS.

AND BECAUSE THERE ARE SEVERAL VALID CONCERNS ABOUT HOME AND AFFORDABILITY GUARANTEES, WHICH WAS, WHICH IS WHY I'M NEUTRAL ON THIS ITEM.

AS FOR CO-OPS, WE'VE SEEN AND I'VE PERSONALLY EXPERIENCED HOW INTENTIONAL LIVING WITH A GROUP OF PEOPLE MAINTAINS AFFORDABILITY.

CO-OPS HAVE SOME OF THE LOWEST RENTS IN AUSTIN, RANGING FROM 500 TO 1100, INCLUDING UTILITIES, INTERNET, FOOD ACCESS, EMERGENCY SUPPLIES, AND COMMUNITY SUPPORT.

CO-OP LIVING HAS ENRICHED MY LIFE AND MADE IT POSSIBLE FOR ME TO PAY OFF MY STUDENT LOANS AND STAY IN AUSTIN WHILE I IMPROVE MY FINANCIAL HEALTH AND BUILD SKILLS IN MEETING FACILITATION, PROJECT MANAGEMENT, CONFLICT RESOLUTION FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, AND ANTI-RACIST COMMUNITY BUILDING.

AND SO I URGE COUNCIL TO ELIMINATE THE OCCUPANCY LIMITS.

AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

ORTEGA.

GREETINGS.

MY NAME IS FRANK ORTEGA FROM DISTRICT SEVEN.

I FIRST ASK THAT YOU POSTPONE THE VOTE ON THE HOME ACT.

THANK YOU.

I HAVE BEEN LIVING IN AUSTIN, TEXAS ON AND OFF SINCE 2019.

IN THE TIME PERIOD THAT I'VE LIVED IN AUSTIN, I'VE EXPERIENCED MANY DIFFICULTIES OBTAINING AND MAINTAINING SAFE AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

I HAVE ALSO BEEN FORCED TO MOVE BACK TO HOUSTON ON TWO SEPARATE OCCASIONS OF SIX MONTH PERIODS WITHIN THIS PAST FIVE YEARS DUE TO HOUSING INSECURITY.

DESPITE WORKING MULTIPLE JOBS WITH HOURS TOTALING 40 PLUS WEEKLY, I HAVE CONTINUED TO LIVE PAYCHECK TO PAYCHECK AND STRUGGLE TO AFFORD MY RENT.

IN MY MOST RECENT LIVING SITUATION, I WAS PAYING 1200 PLUS FOR A SINGLE STUDIO SPACE IN HYDE PARK.

THE CEILING IN MY APARTMENT HAD AN ENORMOUS HOLE IN IT DUE TO RAIN DAMAGE THAT CONSTANTLY LEAKED.

EVERY TIME IT RAINED, MY APARTMENT BEGAN TO SMELL OF MOLD.

AND DESPITE HAVING AN OPEN LEAKING HOLE FOR OVER A MONTH WITHOUT MAINTENANCE, I STILL WAS REQUIRED TO PAY 1200 PLUS AND SOLELY MY RENT.

THIS IS CONSISTENT OF WHAT IT IS LIKE TO LIVE IN AUSTIN, TEXAS.

I LOVE AUSTIN AND I LOVE TEXAS, BUT DUE TO UNAFFORDABLE HOUSING AND GENTRIFICATION, I'LL SOON BE FORCED OUT.

LIKE MANY OF MY BLACK AND BROWN FRIENDS, FAMILY AND COWORKERS, MY HEART BREAKS WITH THE CONSISTENT AND BLATANT PRIORITIZATION OF AFFLUENT WHITE TENANTS IN AUSTIN.

I'M IN OPPOSITION OF THE HOME ACT AND ANY OTHER INITIATIVE THAT MAKES AUSTIN UNAFFORDABLE AND UNLIVABLE FOR THE PEOPLE WHO BUILT IT.

THE HOME ACT CLAIMS TO BE A SOLUTION TO AUSTIN'S AFFORDABILITY CRISIS.

YET THERE ARE NO REQUIREMENTS THAT MAKE HOUSING ACTUALLY AFFORDABLE.

THE HOME ACT WILL NOT AID PEOPLE LIKE ME OR THE AUSTINITES WHO HAVE FUELED CARED FOR AND LOVED AUSTIN FOR GENERATIONS.

WE DEMAND DEEPLY AFFORDABLE HOUSING, THE RESTRICTION OF DEMOLITION OF CURRENT AFFORDABLE HOUSING STRUCTURES AND LOWER PROPERTY TAXES.

WE DEMAND A HOME THAT IS LIVABLE AND AFFORDABLE UNDER 40 HOUR WORK WEEK AND WE DEMAND HOUSING JUSTICE.

THANK YOU.

MATTHEW MCCOY.

HI EVERYONE.

COUNCIL MEMBERS MAYOR.

UH, MY NAME IS MATTHEW MCCOY AND I'M THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNIVERSITY DEMOCRATS HERE AT UT AUSTIN.

I'M A PROUD RESIDENT OF DISTRICT NINE.

I WISH I COULD JOIN Y'ALL IN PERSON TODAY, BUT UNFORTUNATELY I GOT A FINAL TO GET TO IN ABOUT A HALF AN HOUR.

UH, BEFORE I GET STARTED, I JUST WANTED TO TAKE A SECOND TO OFFER OUR CONDOLENCES TO THOSE WHOSE LIVES HAVE ONCE AGAIN BEEN UPROOTED BY ANOTHER INSTANCE OF TRAGIC GUN VIOLENCE IN RECENT DAYS.

AND THANK ALL THE FIRST RESPONDERS WHO RESPONDED TO VISA ATTACKS.

THANK YOU.

I'M HERE TODAY ON BEHALF OF THOUSANDS OF STUDENTS IN GEN Z WHO LIVE IN THE CITY WHO ARE SO OFTEN NOT REPRESENTED IN BOARD SUCH AS THIS, AND TO SHOW SUPPORT STUDENT SUPPORT FOR THE HOME INITIATIVE TO ADDRESS THE ONGOING HOUSING CRISIS HERE IN AUSTIN.

AS A STUDENT WHO LIVES IN AUSTIN AND HAS PREVIOUSLY WORKED EXTENSIVELY IN STUDENT HOUSING, I KNOW THERE'S A LOT OF WORK TO BE DONE TO ADDRESS THIS ISSUE AND WE FIRMLY BELIEVE THE HOME INITIATIVE IS ANOTHER STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION.

THIS COUNCIL HAS TAKEN BY ALLOWING MORE DIVERSE HOUSING OPTIONS AND MORE UNITS IN SMALLER WALLETS AND MORE, UH, OPTIMIZE THE OPPORTUNITY TO REDUCE THE STRAIN CURRENTLY LIMITING GROWTH AS WELL AS MAKE THE CITY MORE SUSTAINABLE AND CLIMATE FRIENDLY.

AUSTIN SHOULD BE A WELCOMING PLACE FOR EVERYONE WHO WANTS TO LIVE AND WORK HERE AND NOT

[02:05:01]

JUST THOSE WHO CAN AFFORD IT.

UH, WE ARE CONCERNED WITH INSTANCES OF DISPLACEMENT, A LACK OF AFFORD OF AFFORDABILITY, BUT BELIEVE NOTHING, DOING NOTHING IS THE WORST THING THAT CAN BE DONE TO SACK THOSE HOUSING CRISIS AND ALLOWING MORE OPTIONS OF HOUSING AND CONSTRUCTION.

MISSING MIDDLE HOUSING IS A STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION TO ADDRESS THIS ISSUE.

UH, NOT NO SURPRISE, BUT UH, HOUSING COSTS CONTINUE TO BE A LIMITING FACTOR FOR ATTRACTING STUDENTS AND PROFESSIONALS WHO WISH TO COME TO UT AUSTIN AND UH, AND ANY OF THE GREAT UNIVERSITIES IN THE CITY.

UM, IT'S NOT UNCOMMON FOR PLACES AROUND THE CAMPUS TO BE UPWARDS OF A THOUSAND DOLLARS A A MONTH AND UH, OR EVEN GREATER THAN A FULL YEAR WORTH OF TUITION.

UM, ONCE THEY GRADUATE, THE NEXT ISSUE IS WHERE DO THEY GO? WHERE DO THEY TURN TO ADVANCE THEIR CAREERS? IN MANY CASES, STUDENTS MOVE TO OTHER CITIES WHERE THEY CAN AFFORD TO LIVE AND ARE LOSING SO MANY TALENTED INDIVIDUALS WHO COULD CONTRIBUTE TO THE THRIVING CULTURE AND WORKFORCE HERE IN AUSTIN.

IN ORDER TO TRAPPED AND RETAIN SO MANY TALENTED PEOPLE AND CONTINUE TO BE A TOP RESEARCH CITY AND TO AFFORD TO LIVE IN THIS VIBRANT CITY, AUSTIN MUST DIRECT THE HOUS, THE LACK OF HOUSING BY RESTRICTIVE ZONING AND ALLOW FOR MORE HOUSING OPTIONS TO BE BUILT.

DOING NOTHING IS THE WORST THING THAT WE CAN DO TO TACKLE THIS HOUSING CRISIS.

AND I APPLAUD THE WORK THIS COUNCIL HAS.

THANK YOU RUSSELL SPEAKER, YOUR TIME HAS EXPIRED.

THANK YOU.

LAURA TABOR HUERTA.

HELLO.

I AM AGAINST THE HOME INITIATIVE.

AUSTIN IS AT A CRITICAL POINT IN ITS GROWTH.

RAPID, UNCONTROLLED GROWTH FROM FORMER CITY COUNCILS HAS CHANGED THE CHARACTER OF THE CITY AND I BELIEVE AUSTIN SHOULD NOW FOCUS ON QUALITY OVER QUANTITY.

UNCONTROLLED GROWTH IS UNSUSTAINABLE IN THE LONG TERM WITH WHAT WE NOW KNOW ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENT.

AUSTIN SHOULD BUILD MORE AFFORDABLE AND LOW-INCOME HOUSING.

THE HOME INITIATIVE RELIES ON A TYPE OF TRICKLE DOWN BUILDING TO SUPPLY THIS MUCH NEEDED HOUSING.

THIS SEEMS DISINGENUOUS TO ME AND MORE FOCUSED ON ALLOWING AUSTIN TO BE PULLED AGAIN TO THE HIGHEST BIDDER.

VERY FOOLISH.

A SKILLED, COMPETENT CITY PLANNER ALONG WITH CITY COUNCIL AND MAYOR SHOULD ADDRESS RESEARCH AND BUILD ONLY THESE TYPES OF HOUSING.

WE HAVE ENOUGH HOUSING FOR THE WEALTHY YES, IN MY BACKYARD TO MORE AFFORDABLE AND LOW INCOME HOUSING.

THANK YOU.

AND I ALSO WANTED TO SAY TO THAT ONE MEMBER WHO INTERRUPTED AND GAVE A SHORT SPEECH.

IT'S INTERESTING THAT YOU HAVE ALREADY DECIDED TO BE FOR THE INITIATIVE BEFORE EVERYONE HAS FINISHED SPEAKING AND SO MANY ARE AGAINST IT AND THAT'S NOT GONNA SWAY YOU, WHICH I FIND VERY INTERESTING.

THANK YOU.

ADELE YORK.

HELLO, UH, MY NAME'S ADELE YORK AND I LIVE IN DISTRICT THREE HERE IN AUSTIN.

I'M A LONGTIME RESIDENT OF TEXAS, A MOTHER, A SMALL BUSINESS OWNER AND AN ARCHITECT.

AND I'M SPEAKING IN SUPPORT OF THE HOME INITIATIVES.

THE HOME ORDINANCE WILL IMPROVE HOUSING AFFORDABILITY AND AVAILABILITY IN AUSTIN CHALLENGES NO AUSTINITE CAN PLAUSIBLY IGNORE.

ADDITIONALLY, IT HAS THE POTENTIAL TO AUGMENT OUR EXISTING SUSTAINABILITY INITIATIVES, SUBSTANTIATING OUR METRO RAIL WITH POPULATION DENSITY SHORTENING CAR GATES AND INCREASING THE OPPORTUNITY FOR MULTIMODAL MODAL TRANSPORTATION.

ADVERSARIES OF THE ORDINANCE ARGUE THAT IT WILL ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR TREE CANOPIES AND WATERSHEDS.

AND TO THOSE I ASK, HOW IS URBAN SPRAWL AFFECTING OUR TREE CANOPIES AND WATERSHEDS? SHALL WE CONTINUE TO GROW OUTWARD LENGTHENING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE MILES, ADDING MORE ROOFS PER CAPITA, MORE HARD SURFACE AND MORE CAR COMMUTES? CERTAINLY THAT SOLUTION DOES NOT DO RIGHT BY OUR CITIZENS NOR OUR NATURAL ENVIRONMENT.

ON THE CONTRARY, THE HOME ORDINANCE MAINTAINS TREE PROTECTION AND DENSIFIED WITHOUT CREATING SIGNIFICANTLY MORE RUNOFF THAN IS ALREADY ALLOWED.

I HAVE LIVED AND WORKED ON BOTH EAST AND WEST COAST AND SEEN FIRSTHAND THE POSITIVE IMPACTS OF MIDDLE INCOME AND MEDIUM DENSITY HOUSING TO THOSE WHO ARE SKEPTICAL.

I URGE YOU TO LOOK AT MINNEAPOLIS WHO HAVE SIMILARLY REFORMED THEIR ZONING CODE AND RECENTLY PUBLISHED DATA ON THE DECREASE OF RENTS.

THE HOME INITIATIVE WOULD SUPPORT AUSTIN'S NATIONAL REPUTATION OF A FORWARD-THINKING, WELCOMING CITY.

I APPLAUD THOSE WHO HAVE WORKED DILIGENTLY TO BRING THIS LEGISLATION TO THE TABLE AND BELIEVE THAT IF APPROVED, THE HOME ORDINANCE WILL PUT AUSTIN ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF HOUSING HISTORY.

I SAY YES TO HOME.

THANK YOU ERIC HARRIS.

ERIC, PLEASE UNMUTE.

HELLO, MY NAME IS ERIC HARRIS.

I'M AN AUSTIN RESIDENT SINCE 1984.

I'M A CIVIL ENGINEER AND BOARD MEMBER OF THE MILLWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION DISTRICT SEVEN.

I'M AGAINST THE HOME INITIATIVE AS ARE AN OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF NEIGHBORS.

I WORKED IN LAND DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION IN AUSTIN SINCE 1993, INCLUDING 12 YEARS WITH THE CITY AND WATERSHED PROTECTION AND PUBLIC WORKS.

AS SUCH, I'M VERY FAMILIAR WITH THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS AND ALARM THAT THE CITY IS PROMOTING.

THIS ILL-CONCEIVED PLAN IN DISMANTLING THE CURRENT OR I APPRECIATE THE URGENCY OF ADDRESSING HOUSING AFFORDABILITY, BUT THIS EFFORT DOES NOT DO THAT.

PROBLEMS ARE

[02:10:01]

SOLVED BY FOCUSING ON SPECIFIC CHANGES TO ACHIEVE A GOAL.

INSTEAD, THIS PROPOSAL DISMANTLES IMPORTANT LIMITS TO PRODUCE OR PROMOTE HARMONY IN OUR NEIGHBORHOODS WITHOUT ANY REAL PROMISE FOR AFFORDABILITY AND DISMANTLING THESE LIMITS.

KEY PLANNING CRITERIA ARE EITHER OUTRIGHT IGNORED OR NOT GIVEN APPROPRIATE CONSIDERATION.

CONSIDERATION NUMBER ONE IS THE CAPACITY OF IN EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE TO ACCOMMODATE THE INCREASED DENSITY, EMERGENCY ACCESS, PARKING, ELECTRIC SERVICE, TRASH, RECYCLE COLLECTION, WATER, SEWER DRAINAGE.

THESE ALL MUST BE CONSIDERED BEFORE CHANGES.

THE DENSITIES ARE ALLOWED.

THE CURRENT REZONING PROCESS PROVIDES AN OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS THIS ISSUE.

THE PROPOSED DOES NOT.

I'LL REMIND YOU THAT THE CITY SPENT MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN THE NINETIES AND TWO THOUSANDS ADDRESSING SANITARY SEWER OVERFLOWS AND THE CITY'S DRAINAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT.

BACKLOG IS DECADES LONG.

CONSIDERATION.

TWO IS THE DESIRABILITY OF THE DENSITY IN AN ESTABLISHED NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE IMPACT TO THAT NEIGHBORHOOD.

OUR NEIGHBORHOOD IS WALKABLE, HAS A MIX OF SINGLE FAMILY TOWN HOMES, DUPLEXES, AND THERE ARE APARTMENTS ABUTTING OUR AREA.

MY NEIGHBOR'S OVERWHELMING OBJECT TO THIS CHANGE.

WE ALL AGREED TO SINGLE FAMILY RESTRICTIONS.

WE BOUGHT OUR HOMES AND OUR CHANGES ARE TO HAPPEN.

WE SHOULD HAVE A SAY AS WE WOULD UNDER THE CURRENT REZONING PROCESS.

OUR NEIGHBORHOOD HAS NOT OBJECTED TO A REASONABLE REZONING IN OUR AREA.

SOMEONE REMARKED THAT YOUR PROPERTY RIGHTS DON'T EXTEND PAST YOUR PROPERTY.

THAT IS AN UNINFORMED POSITION.

ZONING AND RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS PROMOTE HARMONIOUS LIVING BY ESTABLISHING LIMITS ON WHAT FOLKS CAN BILL.

THANK YOU.

SPEAKER, YOUR TIME HAS EXPIRED.

KIMBERLY KOAS.

HI, MY NAME IS KIMBERLY COLES.

I OPPOSE THIS INITIATIVE AND ENCOURAGE FOR A DELAY FOR FURTHER STUDY.

I DO NOT SEE ANY EVIDENCE THAT IT WILL HAVE THE RESULTS THAT YOU WANT AND INSTEAD HAVE UNINTENDED, IRREVERSIBLE RESULTS.

WE WILL NOT GET A DO-OVER.

I LIVE IN DISTRICT NINE AND HAVE WATCHED OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS AS NATURALLY OCCURRING.

AFFORDABLE HOUSING WAS PURCHASED BY DEVELOPERS WHO CONSISTENTLY WON BIDS WITH CASH OVER OFFER.

OVER ALL OTHER OFFERS.

I KNOW THIS BECAUSE I'M A REALTOR AND I WATCHED OLDER HOMES THAT FIVE YEARS AGO SOLD FOR FIVE TO 700,000, SELL FOR 1 MILLION PLUS AS A TEAR DOWN.

THIS WILL ONLY CONTINUE.

CONTINUE.

I WORK WITH A NEIGHBORHOOD COALITION AND WE'VE HAD OVER 2000 SIGNED PETITIONS TO THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AGAINST RUINING OUR NEIGHBORHOODS.

I'M ALSO AN ARCHITECT AND ADHERE TO THE MANY RULES, UM, WHICH WERE ALL CONSIDERED SACROSANCT WHEN THEY WERE CREATED AND SUDDENLY TO FIT TWO MORE FAMILIES PER LOT.

NONE OF THE ORIGINAL LIMITS APPLY ANYMORE.

NO ONE IS ABLE HERE, THE JOB OF THE ARCHITECT, THE REALTOR, THE INVESTOR, DEVELOPER, AND EVEN OUR NEIGHBORS WHEN THEY'RE READY TO SELL.

ALL JUST WANT THE MAXIMUM PROFIT ON EACH PROPERTY.

WE ARE ALL JUST DOING OUR JOB.

THIS INITIATIVE ENCOURAGES, DOES NOT ENCOURAGE AFFORDABILITY AND INSTEAD ENCOURAGES MAXIMUM DENSITY FOR MAXIMUM PROFIT.

IF YOUR MIND IS ALREADY MADE UP, WHY ARE WE DOING THIS? YOU'RE ALL SITTING IN THOSE SEATS BECAUSE OF OUR VOTES.

IF MORE OF US SPEAK OUT AGAINST THIS, DO YOU CARE? THANK YOU, COLIN LINEBERRY.

GOOD MORNING OR GOOD AFTERNOON NOW.

MY NAME'S COLIN LINEBERRY.

I LIVE IN SOUTHWEST AUSTIN IN A SUBDIVISION OF ABOUT 1400 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES.

I'M OPPOSED TO THE COUNCIL'S PROPOSAL TO CHANGE ZONING REQUIREMENTS AND ALLOW TWO OR MORE AUXILIARY DWELLING UNITS OR ADUS ON EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY LOTS.

I'M AGAINST THE PROPOSAL BOTH BECAUSE IT WILL HARM EXISTING HOMEOWNERS LIKE ME AND BECAUSE IT WILL NOT PROVIDE AFFORDABLE HOUSING AS CLAIMED, ONE DEFINITION OF INSANITY IS DOING THE SAME THING AND EXPECTING A DIFFERENT RESULT BY THAT STANDARD.

THIS PROPOSAL IS INSANE.

THE PROPOSAL LARGELY MIMICS EXISTING CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE STATUTES.

CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 6 5 8 5 2 0.2 AND 0.2 REQUIRE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPALITIES, ALL OF THEM TO PROVIDE TWO AUXILIARY DWELLING UNITS OR APPROVED TWO AUXILIARY DWELLING UNITS ON ANY SINGLE FAMILY ZONE LOT WITHOUT REGARD TO SQUARE FOOTAGE.

VERY MUCH LIKE THIS PROPOSAL THAT STATEWIDE STATUTE, WHICH HAS BEEN IN EFFECT FOR SEVERAL YEARS, HAS NOT MADE CALIFORNIA HOUSING AFFORDABLE.

THERE IS NO SAME REASON TO THINK THAT THAT CONCEPT THAT DIDN'T WORK IN CALIFORNIA WILL WORK TO PROVIDE AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN AUSTIN.

I HAVE TWO ADULT SONS, BOTH OF WHOM GRADUATED FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS, HAVE GOOD JOBS BUT CANNOT AFFORD A FIRST HOME IN AUSTIN.

I WOULD VERY MUCH FAIL ANY CONSTRUCTIVE CHANGES THAT WOULD MAKE HOUSING MORE AFFORDABLE FOR THEM AND OTHERS, BUT THIS PROPOSAL WILL NOT DO THAT.

THE PROPOSAL WILL HOWEVER HARM THOSE OF US SOUGHT OUT GOOD AT STABLE NEIGHBORHOODS WHERE THERE ARE TREES, THE KIDS HAVE YARDS TO PLAY IN AND YOU KNOW YOUR NEIGHBORS AND THERE'S A REASONABLE DISTANCE HOUSES.

SHORT-TERM RENTAL ADUS WILL BE OCCUPIED BY INDIVIDUALS WITH L NO LONG-TERM INTEREST IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD WHO CARE

[02:15:01]

LITTLE IF AT ALL ABOUT THE APPEARANCE, PROPERTY VALUES, AND AMENITIES OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD WHERE THEY'RE STAYING.

THIS PROPOSAL WILL GREATLY HARM EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS.

ALTHOUGH THE PROPOSAL IS TOUTED AS A MEANS OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING, THERE'S ABSOLUTELY NOTHING IN THE PROPOSAL THAT REQUIRES OR GIVES ANY INCENTIVE FOR ANY OF THE ADUS TO BE AFFORDABLE.

INCREASED DENSITY OF HOUSING DOES NOT NECESSARILY MEAN INCREASED AFFORDABILITY.

RESIDENTIAL AREAS OF MANHATTAN ARE DENSELY POPULATED, BUT THEY'RE NOT AFFORDABLE.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

SPEAKER.

YOUR TIME HAS EXPIRED, POPULATED WILLIAM HART.

MY NAME'S BILL HART.

I LIVE IN DISTRICT NINE.

I WANT TO THANK ALL OF MY NEIGHBORS, WHETHER THEY'RE FOR OR AGAINST THIS FOR THEIR COMMENTS 'CAUSE IT'LL SPARE ME SOME OF THE POINTS I WAS GOING TO OTHERWISE MAKE.

THE NEIGHBORHOOD'S A PART OF THE FABRIC OF THIS CITY'S HISTORY.

AND ONE OF THE LAST REMAINING CONNECTIONS, THE OLD AUSTIN.

I'M CONCERNED ABOUT THE LOSS OF CHARACTER IN THE NEIGHBORHOODS.

MY NEIGHBORS HAVE SPOKEN ELOQUENTLY TO INFRASTRUCTURE IMPACTS.

I CAME FROM NEW YORK, DENSE, DIRTY PARKING AND CONGESTION NIGHTMARE.

ALSO, YOU'D PROBABLY AGREE WITH ME NOT SO CHEAP TO LIVE THERE.

ULTIMATELY, THE COST OF THIS, AND HERE'S MY REAL CONCERN, IS IF, UM, I GOT IT RIGHT, I THINK IT WAS, UH, COUNCIL PERSON ALLISON ALTER WHO SAID THAT THE CURRENT PROPOSAL ALLOWS UP TO A HUNDRED PERCENT OF THE NEW CONSTRUCTION FOR, UH, LIKE AIRBNB OR SHORT-TERM RENTAL.

TRANSIENT RESIDENTS DO NOT MAKE FOR GOOD NEIGHBORS NOR DO REMOTE OWNERS WHO ARE INVESTORS.

THERE ARE A LOT OF ALTERNATIVES TO THIS.

I WOULD ASK THAT THE COUNCIL NOT DO THIS BY DECREE AND ENGAGE MORE CLOSELY ON THE GRANULAR ISSUES IN THE NEIGHBORHOODS.

I'LL CLOSE WITH TWO COMMENTS.

ONE, I'M TO WHERE I REMEMBER VIETNAM.

SOME OF YOU DO, YOU'LL REMEMBER THE LINE.

WE HAD TO DESTROY THE VILLAGE TO SAVE IT.

I'M A LITTLE CONCERNED ABOUT THAT.

AND THE LAST POINT, AND I'LL CLOSE WAS I REMEMBER WHEN THE COUNCIL OR THE PREVIOUS COUNCIL LIFTED THE PUBLIC CAMPING BAN AFTER TWO YEARS, THEY REALIZED THAT CREATED HAVOC SO THEY REINSTATED IT.

IF YOU START TO DESTROY THE NEIGHBORHOODS AND TEAR DOWN SOME OF THE OLD HOUSES, AND THEY DON'T NECESSARILY HAVE TO BE HISTORIC LANDMARKS, YOU'RE NOT GONNA BE ABLE TO REINSTATE THE NEIGHBORHOODS OR REINSTATE THE DEMOLISHED HOUSES.

DO THIS DELIBERATELY WITH COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND BY VOTE.

I THANK ALL OF YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND THANK YOU SPEAKER, YOUR TIME HAS EXPIRED.

JULIA WOOD.

HELLO, MY NAME IS JULIA WOODS AND I, UM, HI.

I, UH, REPRESENT THE, UM, DAWSON NEIGHBORHOOD AND ALSO AM A MEMBER OF THE A NC.

I'D LIKE TO THANK, UM, MEMBERS OF THE, UH, COUNCIL AND MAYOR WATSON FOR THEIR LEADERSHIP, UM, IN PARTICULAR FOR SUPPORTING DATA GATHERING THAT WILL KEEP US INFORMED ABOUT HOW THESE RULE CHANGES WOULD WORK.

BUT MY CONCERN IS THAT WE ALSO NEED, UM, GUARDRAILS.

WE NEED, UH, AN AUTOMATIC PAUSE ON PERMITS IN AREAS AT RISK FOR DISPLACEMENT, ESPECIALLY COMMUNITIES OF COLOR.

UM, PERHAPS A CIRCUIT BREAKER WOULD BE A BETTER WAY TO DESCRIBE IT.

I'D ALSO ASK THAT WE NOT JUST GATHER DATA ON FLOODING AND POTENTIAL FLOODING, BUT THAT WE HAVE A MORATORIUM ON INCREASED IMPERVIOUS COVER IN FLOOD THROWN AREAS.

OTHERWISE, WE'LL HAVE ALL THE DATA RIGHT IN FRONT OF US AS WE WATCH PEOPLE AND WATCH PEOPLE SWEPT AWAY IN THEIR CARS AND IN THEIR HOMES, WHICH I THINK WE CAN ALL AGREE.

WE DON'T WANT THE HOME INITIATIVE, UM, WILL NOT SOLVE HOUSING SUPPLY PROBLEMS FOR THE MISSING METAL.

AND WE WANT TO SEE OUR FIRST RESPONDERS MEMBERS OF OUR COMMUNITY STAYING IN THIS CITY AND LIVING AMONGST US.

UM, I RECOMMEND BETTER WAYS TO ENFORCE THE SINGLE SHORT TERM RENTAL LIMITS SO THAT WE DON'T HAVE HOUSING THAT SITS EMPTY FOR MONTHS AT A TIME.

IN FACT, PERHAPS WE SHOULD INVESTIGATE TAXING, VACANT AND INCREASED TAXES ON VACANT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES BECAUSE MANY DEVELOPERS WITH DEEP POCKETS ARE ABLE TO LET A UNIT SIT EMPTY RATHER THAN RENT IT AT WHAT THEY CONSIDER TO BE BELOW MARKET RENT.

AGAIN, I'D LIKE TO THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND CONSIDERATION.

THANK YOU.

AND PLEASE THANK YOU, SPEAKER.

YOUR TIME HAS EXPIRED

[02:20:01]

OVER AGAIN.

PAUL PAULA VAUGHN FOR PAULA VAUGHN.

HELLO, PLEASE GO AHEAD.

UH, YES, I'M PAULA VAUGHN AND I LIVE IN DISTRICT EIGHT.

I ALSO WORK WITH, UH, MANY OF THE COMMUNITIES THAT FACE, UH, HOUSING SHORTAGES AND AFFORDABILITY CRISES.

AND SO I'D LIKE TO PROPOSE THAT YOU AT LEAST POSTPONE TODAY'S VOTE AND THAT IT BE CONSIDERED FOR BROADER, UH, REVIEW AND DETAIL AND, UH, SUSSING OUT THE, UH, REACTION OF THE DIFFERENT COMMUNITIES THAT ARE IMPACTED.

UH, I WAS VERY CONCERNED, UH, WHEN I WAS TRYING TO, UH, REVIEW THE WEBSITE THAT HAD THE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT, UH, HOME BECAUSE WHAT I SAW WAS ALL THE TRANSPORTATION ISSUES, THE INFRASTRUCTURE ISSUES, THE GREEN SPACE ISSUES, UH, IMPERVIOUS COVER AND FLOODING ISSUES GENERALLY HAD A, UH, RESPONSE THAT WAS, WE DON'T BELIEVE THE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE QUICK ENOUGH TO HAVE A SEVERE IMPACT.

SO THE QUESTION WOULD BE, IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE THE DEVELOPMENT'S GONNA BE QUICK ENOUGH, HOW'S IT GOING TO SOLVE THE MIDDLE INCOME PROBLEM? THE OTHER QUESTION WOULD BE, UH, AND I AM, UM, GLAD TO HEAR THAT THERE ARE METRICS THAT ARE BEING, UH, CONSIDERED FOR IN PLACE, UH, FOR THE WHOLE ACTIVITY.

BUT WE REALLY SHOULD KNOW, UH, BEST CASE, WORST CASE, A PROBABLE CASE ON SOME OF THESE IMPACT AREAS, ESPECIALLY FOR, UH, OUR TRANSPORTATION AND ALL OUR INFRASTRUCTURE, UH, SITUATIONS.

SO I THINK WE NEED TO UNDERSTAND THAT BEFORE WE GO TO A VOTE ON SOMETHING THAT BLANKETS THE WHOLE CITY WITH ONE SOLUTION, UH, I AM IN FAVOR OF HAVING A DU UH, AVAILABILITY FOR PEOPLE THAT NEED THAT.

UH, BUT I'M CONCERNED THAT WE'RE NOT REALLY, UH, ASSESSING THE IMPACT AND ONCE WE GET THESE MEASURES, THANK YOU.

SPEAKER, YOUR TIME HAS EXPIRED.

GWENDOLYN JU GWENDOLYN, PLEASE UNMUTE MARY CHISHOLM.

HI, UH, MY NAME'S MARY PHAM.

I LIVE IN DISTRICT FOUR IN THE SKYVIEW NEIGHBORHOOD AND I AM AGAINST THE HOME INITIATIVE MAINLY BECAUSE THE CITY HAS NO INFRASTRUCTURE FOR BUILDING, UM, THE DENSE, THE DENSITY THAT THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT.

I'M NOT AGAINST DENSITY, I AM FOR THAT, HOWEVER, SPECIFICALLY IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD.

IT'S A POCKET NEIGHBORHOOD WE CAN BARELY GET OUT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AS IT IS.

UH, AND IF THIS COMES TO FRUITION, UM, I MEAN I, SO IT DOESN'T MAKE ME, CARS CAN'T GET IN AND OUT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD OR IT TAKES FOREVER.

UM, SO YOU KNOW, ONE, THERE'S NO INFRASTRUCTURE.

TWO, THE, ALL THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS ARE SOMETHING THAT COULD BE THOUGHT ABOUT AND THAT THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

YOU ARE, WHEN YOU SAY THIS IS GONNA HELP A FACILITY, IT IS NOT, THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND I HOPE YOU CONSIDER POSTPONING THE VOTE AND I HOPE THAT COUNCILMAN BELLA LISTENS TO, UH, THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE CALLING FROM HIS DISTRICT AGAINST THE INITIATIVE.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR THANK YOU ROBERT NASH.

HI, ROBERT NASH, DISTRICT 10.

APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK MR. MAYOR, COUNCIL MEMBERS SPECIAL SHOUT OUT TO ALISON ALTER.

UH, RATHER IN THE INTEREST OF TIME, I'LL JUST ECHO THE COMMENTS OF BRANDY BURTON, BARBARA EPSTEIN AND OTHERS WHO SO ARTICULATELY DESCRIBED WHY THIS IS A REALLY BAD IDEA.

IT'S A BAD ONE SIZE FITS ALL IDEA THAT, UM, I THINK WE SHOULD SLOW WAY DOWN AND HAVE MEANINGFUL PUBLIC INPUT REGARDING NOT JUST A LITTLE PURPLE POSTCARD.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH, CASSIE DERREN.

UM, GOOD AFTERNOON.

MY NAME IS CASSIE DERREN AND I AM A RESIDENT AND RENTER LIVING IN A DUPLEX IN DISTRICT NINE.

I'M SPEAKING TODAY IN OPPOSITION OF THE HOME INITIATIVE.

UM, FIRST I WANNA SAY IT'S REALLY DISINGENUOUS

[02:25:01]

TO HEAR COUNCIL MEMBER HARPER MADISON SAY HOW SHE VALUES COMMUNITY INPUT AND HEARING PEOPLE OUT, BUT IT'S ALREADY SPEAKING TO HOW SHE'S GOING TO VOTE.

IT'S ALSO NOT OKAY TO USE YOUR RELIGIOUS BELIEF TO BYPASS AND SUPPRESS THE EXPRESSION OF HOW HOME IS PERSONALLY HURTING PEOPLE YOU REPRESENT.

AND TO THINK THAT POLICY ISN'T PERSONAL IS HUGELY PROBLEMATIC.

UM, SO WITH THAT, I WANNA SAY IT'S HARD TO DO THE RIGHT THING, BUT IT MAKES YOUR LIFE EASY AND IT'S EASY TO DO THE WRONG THING, BUT IT MAKES YOUR LIFE HARD.

HOME WILL MAKE LIFE HARD.

THE HOME INITIATIVE IS DRIVEN BY GREED AND PROFIT, NOT WHAT'S ACTUALLY BEST FOR THE MEMBERS OF OUR COMMUNITY.

IT'S SHORTSIGHTED TO BELIEVE THAT THIS INITIATIVE WILL DRIVE DOWN HOUSING COSTS FOR MIDDLE AND LOW INCOME.

HOMEOWNERS AND RENTERS, MIDDLE AND LOW INCOME HOMEOWNERS CAN'T AFFORD TO DEMOLISH AND REDEVELOP THEIR HOME OR BUILD AN A VU.

ONLY HIGH INCOME INDIVIDUALS AND INVESTORS CAN DO THIS.

THIS MEANS INVESTORS WILL BUY UP HOUSING FROM LOW AND MIDDLE INCOME HOMEOWNERS AND HOMEOWNERS WILL FEEL THE PRESSURE TO SELL BECAUSE PROPERTY TAXES WILL INCREASE.

THIS IS GENTRIFICATION BECAUSE HOME IS INVESTOR DRIVEN.

THERE ARE NO AFFORDABILITY REQUIREMENTS.

MONEY IS WHAT'S FUELING THIS INITIATIVE.

INCREASING THE SUPPLY OF HOUSING ONLY CAUSES HOUSING COSTS TO GO DOWN WHEN THERE IS A SUPPLY OF DEEPLY AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

AND HOME IS MISSING THIS KEY INGREDIENT.

WE NEED COMMUNITY-BASED DEVELOPMENT WITHOUT DISPLACEMENT.

WE NEED A DENSITY, NOT MARKET RATE DENSITY, AND WE NEED THESE PLANS TO ALIGN WITH OUR CLIMATE EQUITY PLAN GOALS.

PLEASE POSTPONE THIS VOTE OR VOTE NO TO MAKE ROOM FOR PUBLIC INPUT AND REAL SOLUTIONS.

THANK YOU.

CANDICE SWARM.

HELLO, MY NAME IS CANDICE SWARM AND I AM A COLLEGE STUDENT WHO IS ACTUALLY HOMELESS.

UM, I THINK THAT THE HOME INITIATIVE HAS SOME GOOD ASPECTS TO IT AND I THINK THAT IT ALSO HAS SOME BAD ASPECTS TO IT.

UM, THE ONE THING THAT I LOOK AT AND IS VERY IMPORTANT TO ME IS AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

AND WHEN I SAY AFFORDABLE HOUSING, I MEAN HOUSING THAT IS AFFORDABLE TO EVERYONE.

UM, BEFORE I MOVED TO AUSTIN, MY DAD HAD ALREADY MOVED DOWN HERE TO WORK AT THE SAMSUNG PLANT AND HE TOLD ME SIX YEARS AGO THAT I DID NOT NEED TO MOVE TO AUSTIN BECAUSE I COULD NOT AFFORD IT.

AND THAT WAS SIX YEARS AGO.

AND SINCE THEN, IT HAS ONLY GOTTEN MORE EXPENSIVE AS A HOMELESS COLLEGE STUDENT, I THINK THAT IT IS VERY IMPORTANT TO BRING AFFORDABLE HOUSING TO AUSTIN AND ALSO TO MINIMALIZE THE RISK OF DISPLACING FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALS.

WHILE IT IS IMPORTANT TO BRING AFFORDABLE HOUSING TO AUSTIN, I'M NOT TOO SURE THAT THIS IS THE WAY OF DOING IT.

I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO ESTABLISH MY OWN NONPROFIT, WHICH AIMS TO BUILD A SELF-SUSTAINING COMMUNITY HERE IN AUSTIN.

I BELIEVE THAT THERE IS A GREAT NEED FOR TRUE INCOME-BASED RENTAL UNITS AS WELL AS SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES.

AND IT'S A MUCH BETTER MEANS TO BRING AFFORDABLE HOUSING THAN REZONING THE CURRENT ZONES.

UM, WHILE MANY HAVE STATED THAT THE HOME INITIATIVE WAS NO RISK OF RAISING PROPERTY VALUES OR LEADING TO GEN, GENTRIFICATION OR DISPLACEMENT OF CURRENT RESIDENTS IN THESE ZONES, BUT THE TRUTH IS, AS AN AVERAGE CITIZEN IN AMERICA, I KNOW AS WELL AS MOST THAT THE GOVERNMENTS DO NOT ALWAYS DO.

THEY DO NOT ALWAYS TELL THE TRUTH.

AND THOSE WHO ARE IN THE UPPER CLASS AND DO NOT WANT TO LOSE THE MONEY THAT THEY HAVE, UM, IF THEY CAN MAKE MORE, ALL THE BETTER.

THE CITY OF AUSTIN IS A BEACON OF GROWTH OF HOPE, AND A WIDE VARIETY OF PEOPLE WITH A LARGE RANGE OF SOCIAL CLASSES LIVE HERE.

WHILE THEY HOLD THE POWER, THERE ARE FEWER OF THEM THAN THE AVERAGE AUSTINITE.

WHILE I AM HOMELESS, MY SISTER IS NOT AND I WANT HER.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU, SPEAKER.

YOUR TIME HAS EXPIRED STRUGGLING.

ANASTASIA BALDWIN.

HELLO? YES, YOU CAN BE HEARD.

HELLO.

OH, THANK YOU.

UM, HELLO AND GOOD MORNING TO EVERYONE.

UM, I WANT TO SPEAK, UM, IN FAVOR OF AMENDING THE OCCUPANCY LIMITS FOR HOMES FOR INDIVIDUALS THAT ARE UNRELATED.

UM, MY POINT OF THIS IS THAT, UM, IT ENCOURAGES CONNECTION BETWEEN INDIVIDUALS THAT AREN'T CONSIDERED A NUCLEAR FAMILY.

UM, AND THE TERM FAMILY DOES NOT NECESSARILY ENSURE SAFETY LIKE FAMILY MEMBERS RELATED TO EACH OTHER, DOES NOT ENSURE SAFETY IN AN ENVIRONMENT AND DOESN'T ENCOURAGE LIKE INDIVIDUALS TO, UM, TO PARTICIPATE IN THE CITY AND BE FINANCIALLY STABLE.

UM, I BELIEVE INDIVIDUALS BEING ABLE TO SHARE A HOME OUTSIDE THE OCCUPANCY LIMITS PROMOTES COMMUNITY AND ELIMINATES ISOLATION, ESPECIALLY

[02:30:01]

FOR PEOPLE THAT CAN'T, ARE UNABLE TO GENERATE INCOME AND WILL INCREASE CARE FOR, UM, ELDERLY AND VULNERABLE POPULATIONS.

I CAN SPEAK FROM MY PERSPECTIVE, UM, I'M COMING FROM MILTON, FLORIDA AS A SINGLE MOTHER AND I WAS, UH, ALLOWED TO LIVE IN A CO-OP, WHICH IT HAD MULTIPLE INDIVIDUALS AND WE ARE UNRELATED AND IT WAS VERY SUSTAINABLE FOR ME, UM, VERY AFFORDABLE FOR ME 'CAUSE I COULD NOT AFFORD, UM, CHILDCARE AT THE TIME.

SO I BELIEVE THAT INDIVIDUALS BEING ABLE TO SHARE A HOME CAN, UM, CIRCULATE RESOURCES AND, AND AND JUST OFFER SUPPORT FOR PEOPLE THAT CAN'T, THAT CAN'T REACH THAT FINANCIAL BRACKET OF LIKE 60,000 PLUS.

UM, AUSTIN IS IN A PROCESS OF CATERING TO A SPECIFIC CLASS OF PEOPLE, AN ECONOMIC CLASS OF PEOPLE RIGHT NOW.

AND I, I BELIEVE THAT UM, THIS, THIS, UH, ITEM IS ENCOURAGING LIKE GROWTH AND ENCOURAGING PEOPLE TO COME HERE AND MAKE A LIVING FOR THEMSELVES AND ELIMINATE HOMELESSNESS.

'CAUSE I BELIEVE HOMELESSNESS IS A BIG, I MEAN IT'S SHOCKING HOW BIG OF AN ISSUE IT IS IN THE CITY AND ALSO, UM, THE MENTAL HEALTH CRISIS THAT COMES FROM THAT.

THANK YOU SPEAKER.

YOUR TIME HAS EXPIRED.

SOLVE PROBLEMS I BELIEVE.

ROB SCHNEIDER.

ROB, PLEASE UNMUTE.

HI, I'M ROB SCHNEIDER.

I'M A VOLUNTEER MEMBER OF THE A A RP TEXAS EXECUTIVE COUNCIL.

I'M ALSO A FORMER MEMBER OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AND I'M SPEAKING IN FAVOR OF THE HOME INITIATIVE.

THERE'S A COUPLE OF COMMON ELEMENTS FOR PEOPLE AS THEY AGE.

MOST PEOPLE WILL NEED SOME KIND OF CAREGIVING SUPPORT AS THEY GET OLDER AND BECOME MORE FRAIL AND MOST PEOPLE WANT TO REMAIN IN THEIR HOMES AND IN THEIR COMMUNITIES.

THE HOME INITIATIVE GIVES PEOPLE OPTIONS AS THEY AGE.

FOR EXAMPLE, THEY'RE ABLE TO BUILD HOUSING ON THEIR PROPERTY THAT THEY OWN TO PROVIDE INCOME AND SUPPORT FOR THEMSELVES.

THEY'RE ABLE TO PROVIDE, UH, CAREGIVERS, FAMILY OR CHOSEN FAMILY A PLACE TO LIVE TO SUPPORT THEIR CAREGIVING.

THEY'RE ABLE TO MOVE INTO A SMALLER HOME TO SAVE MONEY.

I LIVE IN DISTRICT FIVE, MY NEIGHBORHOOD IS FULL OF DUPLEXES, SMALL APARTMENT BUILDINGS, SMALL SCALE CONDO COMPLEXES, AS WELL AS SINGLE FAMILY HOMES.

THERE ARE PROBLEMS THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED.

FOR EXAMPLE, SIDEWALK, SIDEWALK INFRASTRUCTURE, BUT IT'S A GREAT NEIGHBORHOOD WITH THINGS TO DO IN WALKING DISTANCE AND A REAL FEELING OF A NEIGHBORHOOD WITH ITS OWN CHARACTER AND SENSE OF COMMUNITY.

THE HOME INITIATIVE CAN FACILITATE MORE OF THE KINDS OF HOUSING THAT I HAVE IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD.

IT CAN HELP PEOPLE SUPPORT THEMSELVES AS THEY AGE SO THAT THEY CAN CONTINUE TO LIVE IN THEIR COMMUNITIES AND IN THEIR OWN HOMES.

THAT'S A GOOD THING FOR PEOPLE AS THEY AGE, AND IT'S A GOOD THING FOR AUSTIN.

THANK YOU RODRIGO AL.

HELLO, CAN YOU HEAR ME? YES, PLEASE PROCEED.

HELLO, MY NAME IS RODRIGO AL AND I AM A RESIDENT OF DISTRICT ONE.

I SERVE ON THE CITY OF AUSTIN'S JOINT SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE AND WAS A MEMBER OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE FOR THE AUSTIN CLIMATE EQUITY PLAN.

I WOULD LIKE TO URGE CITY COUNCIL TO PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT AND SERIOUSLY REFLECT ON THE CONCERNS AND ISSUES THAT THOSE COMMUNITY MEMBERS THAT ARE MOST AT RISK OF DISPLACEMENT HAVE RAISED.

MANY OF THESE COMMUNITY MEMBERS AND ALLIED ORGANIZATIONS HAVE SHARED STORIES ABOUT HOW FAMILIES ARE STRUGGLING TO MAKE ENDS MEET DUE TO LIMITED INCOMES, LACK OF REAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING OPTIONS AND RISING COSTS.

MANY HAVE BEEN PUSHED OUT OF THE COMMUNITIES THAT THEY GREW UP IN.

SOME ARE EVEN WITHOUT SHELTER.

MANY OTHER FOLKS ARE NOT ABLE TO BE HERE TODAY BECAUSE THEY'RE PART OF OUR CITY'S WORKING CLASS.

THEY'RE THE CUSTODIANS, THE TEACHERS, THE CONSTRUCTION WORKERS, THE RESTAURANT WORKERS, THE SINGLE PARENTS LIVING IN RENTAL HOUSING.

THEY'RE THE ONES THAT KEEP THIS CITY RUNNING THAT MAKE THIS CITY'S PROSPERITY POSSIBLE.

ESPECIALLY DURING THE PANDEMIC.

WE TALKED ABOUT HOW THESE FOLKS ARE QUOTE, ESSENTIAL TO OUR COMMUNITY.

WE REFLECTED ON OUR CITY'S HISTORY OF DISENFRANCHISEMENT, OF RACISM AND THE CASTING ASIDE OF ENTIRE COMMUNITIES FOR THE BENEFIT OF THOSE WITH PRIVILEGE, POWER, AND ACCESS TO CITY POLITICS.

IF WE ARE TRULY COMMITTED TO ANTI-RACISM AND HOUSING JUSTICE, IF WE TRULY WANT FOLKS TO TRUST IN CITY GOVERNMENT, IF WE WANT LOW INCOME COMMUNITIES AND COMMUNITIES OF COLOR TO FEEL LIKE THEIR VOICE ACTUALLY MATTERS, WE SHOULDN'T SIMPLY DISPARAGE THEM BY CALLING THEM NIMBYS, BY ACCUSE THEM OF BEING ANTI HOUSING OR DISMISS THEM BY CLAIMING THAT THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND, QUOTE, SIMPLE SUPPLY AND DEMAND THAT IS AT BEST PATRONIZING AND AT WORST, AN INSIDIOUS

[02:35:01]

ATTEMPT TO DISCREDIT THEIR CONCERNS.

PLEASE COME TO THE COMMUNITY NEGOTIATING TABLE, COLLABORATE WITH THESE FOLKS AND THE COMMUNITY BASED ORGANIZATIONS THAT SUPPORT THEIR NEEDS.

THEY'RE THE ONES WHO CARRY THE BURDEN OF GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT ON THEIR BACKS.

THEY HAVE SEEN WHAT HASN'T WORKED.

THEY HAVE ASPIRATIONS FOR WHAT COULD WORK.

PLEASE POSTPONE THE PASSAGE OF THIS PROPOSAL AND WORK WITH YOUR MOST MARGINALIZED NEIGHBORS IN THE EASTERN CRESCENT.

THEY KNOW THEIR COMMUNITIES BEST.

ABRAHAM MARTINEZ.

HI.

GOOD AFTERNOON COUNCIL.

UH, THANK YOU FOR SCREENING TODAY.

UM, I DISTRICT SEVEN, A RESIDENT OF LENDALE AND AN URBAN PLANNER.

I ASKED COUNCIL TO CONSIDER THE US BUREAUS PROJECTION OF A POTENTIAL POPULATION PLATEAU OR DECLINE BY THE CENTURY END.

I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT FOR THE COUNCIL TO IMPLEMENT POLICIES PROMOTING GRADUAL URBAN DENSITY INCREASES OVER TIME LIKE THOSE IN THE HOME ACT, WHICH ISN'T JUST ABOUT CURRENT HOUSING NEEDS, BUT ALSO PREPARING FOR A FUTURE WHERE A STABLE, DEEPLY ROOTED POPULATION CAN PREVENT URBAN DECLINE.

IN AUSTIN, ENCOURAGING DENSITY FOSTERS ORGANIC COMMUNITY GROWTH AND DEEP RESIDENT CONNECTIONS WITH THE CITY.

LEARNING FROM CITIES LIKE NEW YORK IN THE SEVENTIES AND ITS WAY TO EXPERIENCE CHALLENGES AS A RESULT OF POPULATION DECLINE OFTEN CAN PROACTIVELY BUILD A STRONG COMMUNITY RESILIENT AGAINST DEMOGRAPHIC SHIFT.

THE COUNCIL SHOULD SUPPORT INCREASED HOUSING OPTIONS AND DENSER DEVELOPMENT TO MAINTAIN OFTEN THE VIBRANCY AND RESILIENCE FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS.

I'D ASK THE COUNCIL TO CONSIDER PASSING THESE AMENDMENTS TO START PREP, TO START PREPARING TODAY.

THANK YOU TO THE COUNCIL AND STAFF FOR CONSIDERING THIS PERSPECTIVE AND ALLOWING DEMOCRATIC PARTICIPATION IN THIS PROCESS.

I TOM POLK, THIS IS TOM.

LET ME GET MY SCREEN ON WHERE I CAN TALK.

UH, A MOMENT.

I'M TOM POPE, DISTRICT EIGHT CHAIRMAN, FORMER CHAIRMAN OF AUSTIN, BOARD OF REALTORS AND ACTING PRESIDENT OF THE SOUTH BE CAVE WOOD NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.

I'M SPEAKING FOR MYSELF.

I DON'T THINK THAT HOME IS READY FOR PRIME TIME BECAUSE IT RELIES SO MUCH ON HOPES AND OPTIMISTIC ASSUMPTIONS.

IT NEEDS ADDITIONAL DUE DILIGENCE.

FIRST HOME NEEDS TO STATE CLEARLY THAT IT DOES NOT APPLY IF IT CONFLICTS WITH DEEDED RESTRICTIONS.

CITY COUNCIL SPONSORS HAVE ASSERTED THAT EXISTING HOMEOWNERS WOULD BE PROTECTED BY DEEDED RESTRICTIONS.

ACTUALLY, THIS ISN'T THE CASE AS A REALTOR.

I PERSONALLY KNOW OF TWO CASES WHERE DEEDED RESTRICTIONS WERE ATTACKED AND WHERE THE ATTACKERS PREVAILED.

LITIGATION IS A TYPICAL WAY TO DECIDE WHO WINS THE PARTIES WHO GOT THEIR WAY HAD THE DEEPEST POCKETS, MR. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS.

IF YOU HONESTLY BELIEVE THAT DEEDED RESTRICTIONS ALONE WILL PROTECT THE INDIVIDUAL HOMEOWNERS AGAINST WEALTHY DEVELOPERS, THEN YOU CAN ACCOMPLISH, YOU CAN ACCOMMODATE BOTH SIDES OF THIS ISSUE WITH NO LOSS TO YOUR CAUSE.

SIMPLY MAKE SURE THAT HOME CLEARLY STATES THAT IT WOULD, DOES, DOES NOT APPLY IF IT CONFLICTS WITH DEEDED RESTRICTIONS.

THIS WOULD ENSURE THAT YOUR DEEDED RESTRICTION PROMISES COME TRUE AND YOU WOULD PREVENT MYRIAD POSSIBILITIES.

LITIGATION SECOND, THE PLANNING COMMISSION PRESENTED A RENDERING OF A SAMPLE OF HOME THREE UNIT RESIDENCE.

WHAT WE'VE NOT SEEN ARE THE ACTUAL COST OF BUILDING AND SELLING IT BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH HOME.

NECESSARY DUE DILIGENCE WOULD INCLUDE THE CITY COUNCIL GETTING AT LEAST ONE BUILDER TO ACTUALLY BID THIS PROJECT AND TELL YOU EXACTLY HOW MUCH HE'D HAVE TO SELL IT.

THANK FILE YOU SPEAKER YOUR TIME HAS EXPIRED.

AUSTIN TALBERT AUSTIN, PLEASE UNMUTE.

HELLO, I'M HERE.

SORRY.

THANK YOU SO MUCH, UH, COUNCIL MAYOR FOR WHAT YOU'RE DOING.

HUGE SUPPORTER OF THE HOME INITIATIVE.

UM, LOOK FORWARD TO IT.

I JUST WANNA ADDRESS ONE THING.

UH, IN THE DRAFT THERE'S A PROVISION THAT'S GOING TO ELIMINATE, NOT CLARIFY THE ACCESSORY APARTMENT PROVISION.

UH, I SENT SOME STUFF TO COUNCIL OFFICES.

UM, THIS IS ACTUALLY A REALLY GOOD OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE THE CHEAPEST, EASIEST AND MOST AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR EXISTING HOMEOWNERS AND RESIDENTS BY CONVERTING

[02:40:01]

EXISTING SPACE IN THEIR HOUSE, INCLUDING GARAGES INTO WHAT WE STILL CALL GRANNY OR UM, UNIT THE HOUSE.

AND AS SOMEONE THAT'S BUILT IN A DU, THOSE ARE WHAT MAKE A IS, UM, INCREDIBLY EXPENSIVE.

SO THIS IS A HUGE OPPORTUNITY TO ADD ADDITIONAL FLEXIBILITY AS WE ADD UNITS.

IT'S ALSO IMPORTANT TO THINK ABOUT CURRENT HOMEOWNERS AND WAYS THAT CAN MAKE IT, UM, AGAIN, EASIER, MORE FLEXIBLE AND AFFORDABLE.

SO JUST REMOVING THOSE RESTRICTIONS OF HAVING TO BE OVER 65 OR DISABLED.

THESE ARE THINGS WE TALKED ABOUT IN MULTIPLE ROUNDS OVER THE LAST FOUR YEARS.

THIS AMENDMENT HAD PASSED IN THE LAST ROUND AND ALSO, UH, IT WAS ADDRESSED IN THE 80 ORDINANCES.

IT JUST SOMEWHERE IN THE TRANSLATION IT GOT CLARIFIED AS A REMOVAL AND NOT A CLARIFICATION.

SO I WOULD ENCOURAGE Y'ALL TO LOOK AT THAT AND TALK ABOUT HOW WE CAN MAKE AS WE'RE ADDING ENTITLEMENTS, HOW WE CAN MAKE IT MORE FLEXIBLE AS WELL WITH THE CURRENT ENTITLEMENT THAT WE ALREADY HAD WITH THAT ACCESSORY APARTMENT OR INTERNAL SUITE PROVISION.

THANK YOU SO MUCH.

BYE.

VALERIE Z HI, CAN YOU HEAR ME? PLEASE? GO AHEAD.

CAN YOU HEAR ME? YES, PLEASE GO AHEAD.

OKAY.

YEAH.

HI, MY NAME IS VALERIE.

HI, MY NAME IS VALERIE.

UM, I'M THE RESIDENT OF DISTRICT FIVE.

I'M CALLING IT THE PART OF THE PROPOSAL.

UM, I THINK ONE OF THE THINGS THAT, UH, I'VE NOTICED IS THAT A LOT OF THE PEOPLE HERE ARE, UM, MUCH OLDER AND THERE'S NOT AS MUCH OF A GEN Z VOICE.

I AM 24, I'M A BT COLLEGE GRAD.

AND UH, I THINK THAT FOR MANY OF THE PEOPLE MY AGE WE'RE REALLY UNSURE OF HOW WE'LL BE ABLE TO AFFORD HOUSING IN AUSTIN.

UM, AND I THINK THE HOME PROPOSAL IS LIKE A REALLY GREAT WAY FOR LIKE PEOPLE MY AGE TO LIKE HAVE LIKE HOPE OR LIKE A VISION OF HOW WE'LL ACTUALLY BE ABLE TO AFFORD A HOUSE ONE DAY.

UM, ONE OF THE THINGS I'VE, UH, ONE OF MY, UH, FRIENDS RECENTLY HAD TO MOVE AWAY FROM AUSTIN, UH, WITH HER HUSBAND AND HER KID BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T, COULDN'T CONCEIVE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF OWN A HOME.

AND I THINK THAT, UH, LIKE THE HOME PROPOSAL WILL ADDRESS A LOT OF THESE CASES WHERE PEOPLE WHO ARE LOWER INCOME AND DON'T WORK IN TECH OR FINANCE WILL ACTUALLY BE ABLE TO STAY HERE AND, UM, BE ABLE TO HAVE A HOME NEXT.

THANK YOU.

ANDREW PYLE.

HI.

UM, CAN EVERYBODY HEAR ME? YES.

HI.

UM, MY NAME'S ANDREW PAO.

I'M A NATIVE AUSTINITE.

I AM MEMBER OF DISTRICT NINE AND I WANNA VOICE MY SUPPORT FOR THE HOAC.

I SUPPORT, UM, INCREASED NUMBER OF TRIPLEXES, DUPLEXES AND MULTIPLE FORMS OF HOUSING IN THE CITY.

UM, I WOULD LIKE TO, I WOULD LIKE TO SEE MORE OPTIONS FOR EVERYONE, UM, UM, ESPECIALLY THOSE WHO ARE LOOKING BY THEIR FIRST HOME.

AND THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO SAY.

THANK YOU.

QATAR GONZALEZ.

HELLO, UM, I'M CUTTER GONZALEZ.

I'M A RESIDENT OF DISTRICT NINE.

UH, RECENTLY MOVED BACK TO AUSTIN BECAUSE I'M A MUSICIAN AND I WAS A GRAD STUDENT AT THE UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON.

UM, AND I WANTED TO VOICE MY STRONG, STRONG SUPPORT FOR THE HOME INITIATIVE, UM, HOUSING IN AUSTIN.

THE HOUSING COST IN AUSTIN IS ACTUALLY WHAT INITIALLY DROVE ME OUT.

I WENT BACK TO SCHOOL FOR MUSIC, UM, WHICH I HEAR AUSTIN CLAIMS IT'S FAMOUS FOR.

UM, BUT BY NOT ALLOWING HOUSING FOR FOLKS LIKE ME, IT MADE ME AND OTHERS HAVE TO MOVE AWAY.

UM, AND LIKEWISE WHEN I WENT TO GRAD SCHOOL, LUCKILY I ENDED UP IN HOUSTON AND I WAS ABLE TO LIVE IN A PLACE, UH, IN MONTROSE, WHICH IS ONE OF HOUSTON'S PREMIER NEIGHBORHOODS BECAUSE HOUSTON DIDN'T HAVE EXTENSIVE RESTRICTIONS ON THE NUMBER OF HOMES.

SO I WAS ABLE TO FIND AN AFFORDABLE APARTMENT IN THE MIDDLE OF TOWN THAT ALLOWED ME TO BIKE, TAKE THE BUS AND LIVE MY LIFE AS A MUSICIAN IN A WORLD-CLASS.

CITY AUSTIN IS A PLACE I LOVE AND WAS READY TO, TO RETURN TO.

UH, AND IT WASN'T UNTIL THIS CITY COUNCIL, UM, TOOK THE HELM THAT I FELT CONFIDENT THAT I'D HAVE A HOME HERE.

UM, ONCE I STARTED TO HEAR SOME OF THE THINGS ABOUT REFORMING PARKING, REFORMING THE NUMBER OF HOMES THAT CAN BE BUILT AND ALL THESE THINGS, I HAD THE FAITH THAT THIS WOULD BE A PLACE AFFORDABLE TO ME AND TO MY CREATIVE LIFE FOR MANY YEARS TO COME.

SO, UM, ALL THAT TO SAY I AM

[02:45:01]

SUPER, SUPER GRATEFUL FOR THE COURAGE TO DO THIS.

I KNOW IT IS HARD TO DO IN THE FACE OF SUCH OPPOSITION, BUT PEOPLE LIKE ME DESERVE A HOME HERE TOO.

I'M A SEVENTH GENERATION TEXAN AND THAT SHOULDN'T EVEN MATTER, BUT IF PEOPLE LIKE ME CAN'T MAKE A HOME HERE, IMAGINE ALL THE CREATIVITY THAT WE'RE LOSING BY BEING SO RESTRICTIVE.

SO I ENCOURAGE YOU TO PASS IT.

I'M EXCITED TO WATCH THIS HAPPEN AND THANK YOU SO, SO MUCH FOR YOUR SERVICE TO OUR CITY.

YORGOS ECONOMIST.

HELLO.

UH, I'M IN FAVOR OF HOME AS AN INCREMENTAL STEP TO CREATE A MORE INCLUSIVE CITY THAT'S BETTER CONNECTED BY TRANSIT.

THE AFFORDABILITY CHALLENGES FACING AUSTIN ARE NOT UNIQUE.

THE BLUEPRINT IS OUT THERE TO LIMIT ENVIRONMENT DESTROYING SPRAWL.

THE PROPOSED CHANGES IN HOME ARE VERY MODEST AND HAVE BEEN THOUGHTFULLY CONSIDERED AND RESEARCHED.

AND THESE CHANGES ARE VERY PERSONALLY PERSONAL TO ME.

MY FATHER STRUGGLED WITH DEMENTIA FOR YEARS BEFORE EVENTUALLY PASSING AWAY.

I WAS HIS CARETAKER FOR THE LAST COUPLE YEARS OF HIS LIFE.

TO ME, HOME BRINGS OPTIONS TO FAMILIES STRUGGLING WITH ISSUES THAT ARISE PARENTS' AGE AND WILL BRING THE ABILITY TO HAVE MULTI-GENERATIONAL LIVING OR EXTRA INCOME GENERATING CAPABILITY THAT SUPPORT CARE.

I'VE WATCHED MY NEIGHBORHOOD OF TRAVIS HEIGHTS SEE HUMBLE DUPLEXES AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEMOLISHED AND REPLACED WITH LUMBERING MANSIONS.

FRIENDS OF MINE HAVE MOSTLY FLED CENTRAL AUSTIN DUE TO SKYROCKETING HOME PRICES AS OWNERSHIP HAS SWEPT OUT OF THEIR GRASS WHILE NOT AT PANACEA.

FOR ALL OF OUR CITY CHALLENGES, HOME IS THE LEAST WE CAN DO AFTER YEARS OF INACTION AND I WELCOME MORE GENTLE GROWTH POLICIES THAT BETTER INTEGRATE OUR CITY.

THANK YOU.

ALAN BAKER.

ALAN, PLEASE UNMUTE TAMMY EASTON.

TAMMY, PLEASE UNMUTE.

YES, HI, CAN YOU HEAR ME? YES.

YES.

OKAY.

MY NAME IS TAMMY SEN.

I HAVE AN SSF THREE IN DISTRICT EIGHT RIGHT ON THE BORDER OF ROLLINGWOOD FOR THE PAST NINE YEARS.

BEFORE GOING INTO MY REASONS FOR OPPOSING THIS CODE, I WANNA REMIND EVERYONE ON THE COUNCIL AND MAYOR WATSON THAT YOU ARE A CIVIL SERVANT AND YOU HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO REPRESENT WHAT THE MAJORITY OF YOUR CONSTITUENTS WANT.

AND I THINK IT'S FAIRLY OBVIOUS THAT THE MAJORITY OF YOUR CONSTITUENTS DO NOT WANT THIS CODE TO BE PASSED AS IS GIVEN THE STRONG NUMBER OF OBJECTIONS.

YOU HAVE A DUTY TO POSTPONE THIS ORDINANCE UNTIL FURTHER DISCUSSION AND RESEARCH HAS BEEN DONE.

ULTIMATELY, IF YOU HONESTLY CARE ABOUT YOUR CONSTITUENTS AND THEIR NEEDS, YOU WILL FORWARD THIS DECISION TO PEOPLE THROUGH A VOTE BY THE PUBLIC IN THE NEXT ELECTION ELECTION.

I APPLAUD YOU FOR YOUR GOAL OF CREATING AFFORDABLE HOUSING, WHICH I WOULD LOVE TO HAVE AS WELL.

HOWEVER, YOU HAVE NO PROOF THAT THIS WILL CREATE THAT GOAL.

I HAVE NO IDEA WHY YOU WOULD POTENTIALLY PASS A CODE OF THIS SIGNIFICANT OUT A PUBLIC VOTE AND WITHOUT FIRST TESTING IT OUT IN ONE OR TWO NEIGHBORHOODS.

WHILE YOU THINK THIS WILL BE CREATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING, WE THINK THIS WILL BE A GIFT YOU ARE GIVING TO DEVELOPERS THAT WILL HAVE DEVASTATING EFFECTS ON OVER 106,000 PEOPLE.

HOW DO I KNOW THAT? BECAUSE I'M A DEVELOPER MYSELF AND AS DEVELOPER, THIS SOUNDS LIKE A GREAT LAW.

BUT BEFORE I'M A DEVELOPER, I'M A CIVIL I, I'M A MEMBER OF COMMUNITY AND A MEMBER OF A COMMUNITY.

I WANNA MAKE SURE THAT MYSELF AND MY COMMUNITY ARE PROTECTED.

THIS CODE WILL NOT HELP MIDDLE CLASS INCOME .

IT IS A CODE THAT WILL PUT MORE MONEY INTO POCKETS OF THE WEALTHY BUYERS AND INVESTORS.

THE BIGGEST PROBLEM I HAVE WITH THIS CODE IS THAT HOW IT WILL, IT'S CLEAR AIR CUTS CANNOT NOT HANDLE POPULATION SINCE IT'S BARELY HANGING ON NOW EVERY HOT IN THE HUNDREDS, I RECEIVE A NOTE.

AUSTIN UTILITIES PLEADING WITH EVERYONE TO DECREASE ELECTRICITY.

THANK YOU.

SPEAKER TIME.

INSPIRING THE INSIDE TEMPERATURE.

NEXT SPEAKER IS TERRY MCGINTY.

TERRY MCGINTY, PLEASE UNMUTE.

NEXT SPEAKER IS GWENDOLYN JEWISH.

[02:50:03]

GWENDOLYN? YES.

HI.

I CHECKED TO GET UNMUTED, I APOLOGIZE.

THE MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND FELLOW CITIZENS OF AUSTIN.

I APPRECIATE THIS OPPORTUNITY THAT WE'RE HAVING TO FINALLY DISCUSS THIS IN A REALLY OPEN FORUM.

THIS IS A TAKING WE ALL, WHEN WE PURCHASED SINGLE FAMILY HOMES OR WHATEVER TYPE OF HOMES WE'RE LIVING IN, WE BOUGHT THEM WITH CERTAIN DEEDED RESTRICTIONS THAT WE UNDERSTOOD, WE WERE ABLE TO FIND OUT WAS REALLY GOING ON WITH OUR PROPERTY.

THIS IS SOMETHING THAT REALLY NEEDS TO HAVE THREE THINGS.

WE NEED TO POSTPONE THE CIVIL UNTIL WE HAVE MORE DATA.

WE NEED TO DO MORE RESEARCH, TESTING IT IN A SMALL AREA RATHER THAN BLANKING IT CITYWIDE.

AND WE NEED TO COMMUNICATE.

COMMUNICATE WITH THE INDIVIDUAL NEIGHBORHOOD GROUPS.

I'M A MEMBER OF MY NEIGHBORHOOD CONTACT TEAM AND WE NEED TO HAVE THE CITY BE MORE TRANSPARENT.

THERE IS NOTHING IN THIS HOME INITIATIVE THAT'S GONNA PRECLUDE AN URBAN SPRAWL.

THERE'S NOTHING HERE THAT FORCES NEW DEVELOPMENTS TO HAVE A CERTAIN LEVEL OF AFFORDABILITY.

THE GREENEST HOME AND THE MOST AFFORDABLE HOME IS THE ONE THAT'S ALREADY THERE.

THERE IS NO ECONOMICS THAT ALLOWS SOMEBODY TO DEMOLISH SOMETHING BUILD FROM SCRATCH AND MAKE IT MORE AFFORDABLE.

THAT'S JUST A PIPE DREAM, I'M SORRY TO SAY.

AND I REALLY FEEL LIKE OUR INFRASTRUCTURE IS NOT GONNA BE ABLE TO SUPPORT THIS.

THERE'S TWO HOUSES NEAR ME WHERE WE ALREADY HAD WITH OUR CURRENT SF THREE ZONING, ONE HOUSE CAUGHT ON FIRE AND IT CAUGHT THE SECOND HOUSE ON FIRE.

NOW TWO FAMILIES ARE OUT HOMES AND ONCE WE GET SIX HOMES ON A SF THREE AN EXIST, YOU KNOW OUR TODAY'S SSF THREE LOT, THERE'S NO WAY THAT THE FIRE DEPARTMENT CAN GET TO THOSE HOUSES.

WE'RE JUST CREATING A BUNCH OF UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES WITHOUT HAVING THOROUGHLY INVESTIGATED THE WHOLE THING.

THANK YOU.

IT'S REALLY THANK YOU SPEAKER.

YOUR TIME HAS EXPIRED AND NOTHING FOR NEXT SPEAKER IST WARD.

HELLO.

THANK YOU SO MUCH COUNSEL.

MY NAME'S TONYA WARD.

I'M A CULTURAL WORKER.

I LIVE IN DISTRICT FIVE.

I HAVE LIVED IN DISTRICT ONE AND FOUR AND SAW THAT THERE WAS SO MUCH INCREASE IN DENSITY AT THE SAME TIME AS INCREASE IN PRICE.

AND IT SEEMS LIKE EVERY TIME THERE WAS A DUPLEX THAT WAS PUT ON A SINGLE FAMILY LOT THAT THOSE DUPLEXES WOULD SELL FOR EVEN MORE THAN THE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES WOULD IN MOST CASES.

AND I'M WONDERING IF ALL THE DATA THAT THE MAYOR INTENDS TO COLLECT AFTER THE PASSAGE OF HOME FOR UH, THREE PLEXES COULD NOT JUST BE APPLIED TO ALREADY WHAT'S HAPPENED WITH DUPLEXES.

I THINK WE'D SEE THAT IT WOULD BE, UH, THAT THIS ACTUALLY INCREASES THE PRICE OF HOUSING, WHICH IS WHY I AM OPPOSED TO THE HOME INITIATIVE AND I CAN'T REALLY FIGURE OUT WHY.

BESIDES A DEEP FAITH IN TRICKLE DOWN ECONOMICS.

NO ONE HERE HAS CEASED TO EXPLAIN EXACTLY HOW THIS IS GOING TO MAKE AUSTIN MORE AFFORDABLE.

BUT SO MANY PEOPLE HAVE DESCRIBED EXACTLY HOW WILL MAKE IT LESS AFFORDABLE.

AND I THINK WITH SO MANY BRILLIANT PEOPLE ON ALL SIDES OF THIS ISSUE HERE WILLING TO DISCUSS AND HOW TO MAKE THIS BETTER, WHY WOULDN'T WE TAKE THE OPPORTUNITY TO BRING PEOPLE TOGETHER DURING THE SPRING AND COME UP WITH SOME GREAT PROPOSALS IN GOOD FAITH WITH EVERYONE IN THE COMMUNITY WORKING TOGETHER.

MAYBE CUT OUT THE BILLIONAIRE INVESTORS FOR A MOMENT AND TRY TO WORK ON WHAT THE COMMUNITY ACTUALLY WANTS.

AND SO WE DON'T REMAIN DIVIDED ON THESE TYPES OF ISSUES.

WE COULD POTENTIALLY COME TOGETHER AND CREATE REAL SOLUTIONS.

I'VE HEARD A LOT OF AMAZING THINGS FROM A LOT OF AMAZING PEOPLE ALREADY TODAY.

I WANT TO THANK EACH AND EVERY ONE OF YOU FOR COMING OUT AND THANK YOU ALL, ALL FOR YOUR TIME.

PEACE JAS BELL.

HELLO.

UM, MY NAME IS JA BELL.

UM, I'M IN DISTRICT ONE.

I AM HAVE LIVED IN AUSTIN MY ENTIRE LIFE.

UM, I AM HERE TO, UH, OPPOSE HOME AND TO ASK FOR, UM, IT TO BE POSTPONED.

UH, I AM ALSO A HOMEOWNER.

I DON'T HAVE FAITH BASED ON, UH, WHAT PEOPLE HAVE DESCRIBED THAT THIS IS NOT GOING TO MAKE PRICES SHOOT UP.

UM, THERE'S REALLY, IT DOESN'T REALLY, UH, ADDRESS THE HOUSING AFFORDABILITY CRISIS.

UM, AND UM, I'VE HEARD A LOT OF OTHER PEOPLE SAY THE SAME WITH AS THE PREVIOUS SPEAKER DESCRIBED, LIKE CONCRETE REASONS AND WE HAVEN'T HEARD CONCRETE REASONS, UM, FOR HOW THIS WILL ACTUALLY MAKE IT MORE AFFORDABLE.

UM, SO I'M ASKING YOU TO POSTPONE THIS, ASKING YOU TO VOTE NO ON THIS SO THAT WE CAN ACTUALLY COME UP WITH

[02:55:01]

THOSE SOLUTIONS.

UM, THANK YOU SO MUCH.

GARY BABBITT.

HI, MY NAME IS GARY AND I WAS BORN IN 1989, DISTRICT THREE RESIDENT IN MONTAO SPEAKING IN SUPPORT.

I'D LIKE TO START BY EXPRESSING GRATITUDE.

GRATITUDE FOR LIVING IN THE GREATEST CITY IN THE WORLD.

I'M GRATEFUL TO BE ABLE TO AFFORD MY SINGLE FAMILY HOME.

I'D LIKE TO SAY THANKS TO THE COUNCIL MEMBER WHO INTRODUCED THIS MEASURE, UM, CHANGING HER POLICY MINDSET FROM ONE OF SCARCITY AND RESTRICTION TO ONE OF GROWTH.

UM, THANKS TO THE COUNCIL MEMBER WHO CALLED FOR CIVILITY, HUMANITY, AND OPEN DISCUSSION AS SHE EXERCISED HER FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO RELIGIOUS LIBERTY AND FREE SPEECH.

IT'S AMAZING THAT JUST A DECADE AGO THIS BODY WOULD MEET AND DISCUSS WHETHER A SINGLE RESIDENT WOULD BE ALLOWED TO INSTALL A GARAGE DOOR ON THEIR CARPORT AND IT WOULD BE AN EMOTIONAL EXPERIENCE FOR ALL INVOLVED.

AND NOW WE ARE DECIDING TO MAKE A BIG SWEEPING CHANGE LIKE THIS TO ALLOW PEOPLE TO BUILD MORE ON THEIR LOTS.

UM, CHANGE IS HARD, IT'S DIFFICULT, IT'S EMOTIONAL, BUT I THINK THIS IS THE RIGHT MOVE FOR THE CITY TO ALLOW MORE PEOPLE TO LIVE HERE AND BE ABLE TO AFFORD THE GREAT CITY THAT WE HAVE.

THANKS, TERRY MCGINTY.

HELLO, MY NAME IS TERRY MCGINTY.

I LIVE IN NUNA NEAR 34TH STREET AND DUVAL IN A HISTORIC HOME THAT WE HAVE LOVINGLY RESTORED OVER THE YEARS.

UH, FOR A LONG TIME I WAS ON MAYOR WATSON'S, UH, EXERCISE ROUTE TO HE WALKED BY OUR HOUSE.

I WOULD LIKE TO SPECIFICALLY ADDRESS THE ELIMINATION OF SIX UNRELATED ADULT LIMITS ADULTS LIVING IN A UNIT.

I LIVE NEAR THREE STUDENT GROUP HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS, EACH OF WHICH SUPPOSEDLY HAVE A SIX PERSON LIMIT.

THERE ARE SEVEN SUPER DUPLEX TYPE UNITS ON MY BLOCK, WHICH WOULD BE A TOTAL OF 42 ADULTS LIVING IN THESE HOUSES.

ALTHOUGH I BELIEVE LIKELY IT IS MORE.

WE CONSTANTLY DEAL WITH PARTIES, LIVE BANDS, DJS, TRASH, ILLEGAL PARKING, DRIVING, TRESPASSING AND GRAFFITI.

WE HAVE BEEN TREATED TO WHAT THE SEC HOUSE REFERRED TO AS THE HALLOWEEN S**T FESTIVAL WHERE THERE WERE MORE THAN A HUNDRED ATTENDEES ABOUT EIGHT WEEKS AGO.

THERE WAS A LIVE BAND AT ONE OF THE HOUSES ONE DAY.

THERE WAS A DJ WHO PLAYED AMPLIFIED MUSIC UNTIL SEVEN IN THE MORNING.

WE'VE HAD KIDS SHOOT BOTTLE ROCKETS AT OUR HOUSE WILL BE COMPLAINED.

WE'VE BEEN TOLD BY CITY STAFF THAT THERE'S NO RECOURSE EXCEPT TO GO TO MUNICIPAL COURT.

THAT PUTS THE ENTIRE ONUS ON THE HOMEOWNERS.

WE DO GO SPEAK TO TENANTS.

WE CALL 3 1 1 AND NINE ONE ONE.

WE CONTACT OWNERS, WE CONTACT RENTAL AGENTS.

SOMETIMES WE GET RELEASED MOST OFTEN WE DO NOT.

IF YOU DO AWAY WITH THE SIX PERSON LIMIT, OUR NEIGHBORHOOD WILL BECOME A DE FACTO FRAT HOUSE PARTY AREA AND MOST OF US WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SURVIVE.

I HAVE LIVED HERE FOR 35 YEARS, MY HUSBAND FOR 50 YEARS, AND WE IMPLORE YOU NOT TO DO AWAY WITH THE SIX PERSON LIMIT.

THANK YOU.

TERRELL WEDERMEYER? UM, YES, I JUST WANNA KNOW IF EVERYBODY CAN HEAR ME.

YES, GO AHEAD PLEASE.

OH YES, UM, I JUST, I, I'M, I WAS BORN AND RAISED IN AUSTIN.

UM, MY GRANDMOTHER AND GRANDFATHER OWNED A HOUSE ON EAST AUSTIN AND BASICALLY AUSTIN IS HOME FOR ME.

UM, A LOT OF THE PEOPLE THAT GREW UP AROUND EAST AUSTIN ARE FAMILY AND WE DEVELOPED LIKE A LOVE FOR EACH OTHER.

UM, ONE THING THAT I REALLY APPRECIATE ABOUT AUSTIN, ESPECIALLY EAST AUSTIN, IS THAT EVEN THROUGH EVERYTHING, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE LOVE AND I THINK A LOT OF PEOPLE THAT ARE NOW COMING INTO THE CITY ARE CAUSING A LOT OF FINANCIAL STRIFE FOR ONE ANOTHER.

AND UM, YOU KNOW, IT'S PUTTING A LOT OF ON OUR, OUR SHOULDERS.

UM, I THINK THAT I'M JUST GRATEFUL FOR THIS MOMENT TO BE ABLE TO TO TO SPEAK FOR OUR COMMUNITY AND TO GET ANYONE WHO IS POSSIBLY TOO FOCUSED ON LIKE THE FINANCIAL SIDE OF, OF LIFE, UM, TO KIND OF GROUND THEMSELVES

[03:00:01]

A LITTLE BIT RIGHT NOW AND TO THINK ABOUT THOSE OF US IN THE COMMUNITY THAT GREW UP IN AUSTIN AND ABOUT HOW THIS WILL AFFECT THE LOVE THAT WE HAVE FOR ONE ANOTHER.

AND WE'RE TRYING TO BASICALLY KEEP OUR COMMUNITY TOGETHER BECAUSE THIS IS WHAT OUR ANCESTORS STARTED.

THIS IS WHAT THE ONES THAT WENT BEFORE US STARTED.

SO THIS IS KIND OF LIKE US COMING TOGETHER WITH OUR VOICES.

WE MAY NOT HAVE THE RESOURCES FINANCIALLY, BUT WE'RE COMING TOGETHER WITH OUR HEARTS AND UM, I REALLY APPRECIATE NIKA ARNOLD AND JUST PRETTY MUCH MY ENTIRE COMMUNITY FOR JUST COMING TOGETHER AND JUST, YOU KNOW, SHARING THEIR VOICES AND THEIR OPINIONS AND THEIR LOVE.

AND I JUST HOPE THAT YOU KNOW ANYONE ON THE, THE OPPOSITE SIDE.

UM, YOU KNOW, ANYONE TRYING TO BASICALLY PUSH FORWARD WITH THIS AGENDA, UM, CAN JUST KIND OF HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF COMPASSION FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE MORE SO IN THEIR HEARTS WITH, WITH WITH LIFE.

YOU KNOW, BECAUSE THIS HAS CAUSED A LOT OF SPEAKER, YOUR TIME HAS EXPIRED.

THAT CONCLUDES REMOTE SPEAKERS.

SO THIS SESSION IS ENDED.

UM, I'LL NOW GO ON TO IN PERSON.

SO AS THE MAYOR MENTIONED, THERE ARE TWO PODIUMS. I'M GOING TO CALL FIVE PEOPLE AT A TIME.

PLEASE USE EITHER ONE OF THE VACANT OR OPEN, UH, PODIUMS. UM, YOUR NAME WILL BE CALLED ONCE AND THEN WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE NEXT.

UM, THE FIRST SPEAKER IS ANTHONY LUSARDI, FOLLOWED BY CYRUS, TASHA, COREY, LISA GRAY, LISA WIMBERLEY, AND TINA BARRETT.

PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME WHEN YOU, UM, BEGIN YOUR COMMENTS.

THANK YOU.

READY? GO AHEAD.

UH, GOOD AFTERNOON.

MY NAME IS ANTHONY AND I'M A RESIDENT OF DISTRICT THREE.

I'M SPEAKING IN TODAY AS THE SUPPORT OF HOME.

THANK YOU TO ALL OF YOU FOR SUPPORTING THIS WONDERFUL BILL AND TO COUNCIL MEMBER POOLE FOR PROPOSING IT.

I ALSO WANNA GIVE A SPECIAL THANKS TO COUNCIL MEMBERS VELAZQUEZ AND HARPER MADISON, UH, COUNCIL MEMBER VELAZQUEZ FOR YOUR INCREDIBLE SPEECH OPPOSING THE I 35 EXPANSION BECAUSE WE NEED VOICES LIKE YOURS TO SPEAK TRUTH TO POWER AND COUNCIL MEMBER HARPER MADISON, FOR YOUR ABILITY TO BE DIRECT AND TO CALL OUT MISINFORMATION.

AND IT'S A RARE QUALITY THAT IS SORELY NEEDED IN OUR POLITICAL DISCOURSE.

MY WIFE AND I ARE HUGE FANS OF YOU AND WE SHOULD ALL BE SO BRAVE TODAY.

AUSTIN IS IN A HOUSING CRISIS BECAUSE OF OUTDATED AND OFTEN RACIST LAND USE POLICIES.

POLICIES THAT ARE NOT UNIQUE TO AUSTIN BUT ARE ENDEMIC ACROSS THE COUNTRY.

AND THERE ARE SINS THAT WE CONTINUE TO PERPETUATE AND PAY FOR, BUT WE ARE NOT ONLY FACING A HOUSING CRISIS.

INSTEAD OUR HOUSING CRISIS IS PLAYING LARGE PART IN UNRAVELING OUR SOCIAL FABRIC WITHOUT REALIZING THAT WE'VE BEEN PLACED IN BOXES.

OUR HOMES ARE DISTANT AND THEY LACK SIDEWALKS, CARS SPEED DOWN WIDE RESIDENTIAL STREETS AND KIDS CAN'T PLAY SAFELY.

OUTSIDE HOUSES ARE GETTING BIGGER AND BIGGER AND THEY'RE HOLDING LESS OF US.

THE AVERAGE NEW HOME IN AUSTIN IS OVER 3000 SQUARE FEET AND HOLDS TWO PEOPLE.

PEOPLE WE'VE PUSHED OUT OF AUSTIN NOW DRIVE THEIR DOGS TO PARKING LOTS TO WALK THEM AND PARENTS DRIVE THEIR KIDS 30 MINUTES TO AN HOUR EACH WAY TO ATTEND SCHOOL, VISIT A PARK, OR SEE FRIENDS.

AND THIS IS NOT NORMAL BEHAVIOR.

WE HAVE ALTERED OUR CITIES TO BE INHUMANE, COLD AND DISTANT.

WE, OUR ACTIONS CAUSE OUR WORLD TO HEAT UP WHILE OUR PERSONAL LIVES GROW COLDER.

WE ARE COLLECTIVELY LONELY, POLARIZED AS YOU CAN SEE AND POORLY HOUSED.

BUT IT'S NOT ALL DOOM AND GLOOM FOR MINNEAPOLIS AND ST.

PAUL TO CHARLOTTE AND RALEIGH, ARLINGTON, HOUSTON, OREGON AND MONTANA.

GOOD PEOPLE THERE AND ELSEWHERE ARE DOING THE WORK TO HEAL THIS BETTER LEGACY.

AND SO SHOULD WE.

HOME IS ONE OF MANY, MANY NECESSARY STEPS TOWARDS REPAIRING OUR CITY.

IT'S NOT THE ONLY ONE AND THERE IS SO MUCH TO DO IN NO TIME TO RAISE.

WE WILL SUCCEED IN THIS AND WE MUST SUCCEED IN THIS.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR HEARING ME.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR TESTIMONY.

AND BEFORE WE GO TO THE NEXT SPEAKER, I JUST WANTED TO MENTION TO THE AUDIENCE THAT THERE ARE TVS BEHIND US TOO.

SO IF YOU SEE PEOPLE STEP OFF TO GRAB A SODA, WE CAN STILL HEAR THE TESTIMONY.

I JUST, JUST DIDN'T WANT YOU TO THINK BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE MOVING AROUND THAT.

UM, WE CAN'T HEAR YOU.

GO AHEAD.

HI, I'M LISA GRAY.

I AM FOR THE HOME INITIATIVE.

FIRST I WANNA THANK COUNSEL FOR LOOKING AT THIS.

I KNOW YOU'VE ALL DONE YOUR RESEARCH AND THIS IS NOT A FLIPPANT VOTE FOR ANY OF YOU.

A LOT OF THE OPPOSITION TALK ABOUT NOT BEING AFFORDABLE ENOUGH AND I ACTUALLY AGREE WITH THEM, BUT THAT SHIP HAS SAILED.

WE NEEDED THESE CHANGES 10 YEARS AGO TO KEEP UP WITH THE PEOPLE MOVING HERE.

WHAT WE NEED TO DO NOW IS TO KEEP UP THE LOW END OF THE PRICE RANGE TO KEEP IT DOWN AND TRY AND LOWER IT.

IF WE DO NOTHING, IT WILL KEEP GOING UP.

SO LET'S LOOK AT SOME DATA.

I DID A SEARCH OF THE BRENTWOOD CRESTVIEW NEIGHBORHOOD 'CAUSE THAT'S WHERE I LOAD FOR MANY, MANY YEARS AND UM, I'M VERY FAMILIAR WITH THAT AREA.

I TRIED THIS IN MANY DIFFERENT NEIGHBORHOODS TOO.

AND IT'S THE SAME THING.

FOR EXAMPLE HERE I LOOKED AT THE LAST THREE YEARS FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES UNDER $450,000.

GO TO THE NEXT ONE.

THIS IS THE AREA.

ANYBODY THAT WANTS TO REPRODUCE THIS CAN DO THIS.

I DIDN'T

[03:05:01]

DO ANY TRICKS.

AND THESE ARE THE RESULTS OF THE 25 RESULTS EXCLUDING THE FLOODPLAIN, WHICH MOST PEOPLE DO NOT WANNA LIVE IN.

IT'S DIFFICULT TO DO ANY REPAIRS IN THE FLOODPLAIN.

UM, AND IT'S A FLOODPLAIN.

SO ANYWAYS, UH, EXCLUDING THE FLOODPLAIN, THE TOP ARE IN, ARE THE SHARED LOTS.

YOU CAN SEE I HAVE TO MARK IT OUT 'CAUSE IT'S DATA, BUT THE, YOU CAN SEE THE B ONE, B ONE, ALL THOSE ARE SHARED HOMES, SHARED LOTS, TWO HOMES ON A LOT.

SO WE ARE DOING THIS RIGHT NOW AND IT IS WORKING.

ZERO OF THOSE FIRST 15 ARE HOMES ON ONE LOT.

SO THIS IS PROVIDING THE LOWER END OF THE MARKET FOR A NEIGHBORHOOD.

AND SO THEN I THOUGHT, OKAY WELL LET'S LOOK AT SOMETHING MORE RECENT.

'CAUSE CRESTVIEW HAS GOTTEN MORE EXPENSIVE, THERE'S NOTHING FOR THAT PRICE ANYMORE.

UM, CAN YOU GO THE NEXT ONE? I'M SORRY, CAN YOU GO BACK ? I THINK WE SKIPPED AROUND HERE.

SORRY.

GO FORWARD .

I GUESS YOU SKIPPED THE DATA PART, BUT THAT'S OKAY.

THIS IS CURRENT ACTIVE FAMILY HOMES RIGHT NOW.

THAT WAS MY TIME UP ALREADY.

OKAY, , I'M CALLING UP THE NEXT FIVE SPEAKERS.

IF YOUR NAME IS CALLED, PLEASE MAKE YOUR WAY TO THE PODIUM, EITHER ONE AND MA STATE YOUR NAME WHEN YOUR NAME IS CALLED CINDY REED WHO HAS DONATED TIME BY BOBBY LAVINSKY.

AND I SEE MR. LAVINSKY HERE.

SO CINDY GETS FOUR MINUTES.

UM, ON DECK IS KIRK MARK, LEAH MAYOR PRO ACHE DAVID WHITWORTH AND SHE'S ABOUT TO LEAVE.

I'M TRYING TO CATCH HER.

DID YOU NEED THE LAST SPEAKER? I WANTED TO ASK MS. MS. GRAY COULD HAVE YOU SHARED THAT INFORMATION WITH OUR OFFICES.

WOULD YOU MIND DOING SO? WELL, UM, YOU COULD SHARE IT WITH THE CLERK WHO COULD SHARE IT WITH US ALL OR YOU COULD SEND IT TO US ELECTRONICALLY.

I'D APPRECIATE THAT.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

AND IF YOUR NAME'S BEEN CALLED, PLEASE COME ON UP SO THAT AS SOON AS ONE SPEAKER'S FINISHED THAT YOUR NEXT IN LINE.

CAN I GO? YES.

OKAY.

GROWING UP THE EAST SIDE WAS A BUSTLING COMMUNITY THAT NO ONE ELSE DESIRED, BUT PEOPLE LIKE ME, I'M SORRY, CAN YOU PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME? CINDY REED.

I REMEMBER CROSSING THE FREEWAY WHILE ATTENDING UT AND MS. ALBERT, WHO OWNED A MAKESHIFT BEAUTY SHOP ACROSS FROM DOWNSVILLE, WOULD REMINISCE ABOUT HER FORMER FRIEND AND CLIENT, THE GREAT BARBARA JORDAN.

NOW THAT LITTLE SHOP'S GONE AND WHAT STANDS ARE LUXURY HOMES? THE HISTORY ERASED MY MEMORY OF OUR CHATS MAKES ME THINK OF THIS QUOTE FROM BARBARA JORDAN.

IF WE PROMISE AS PUBLIC OFFICIALS WE MUST DELIVER.

IF WE AS PUBLIC OFFICIALS PROPOSE WE MUST PRODUCE.

YOU ARE PROPOSING A PLAN WITHOUT PRODUCING ANY STUDIES OR EVIDENCE OF ITS IMPACT.

AS PUBLIC OFFICIALS, YOU SHOULD NEVER IMPLEMENT PLANS THAT IMPACT PEOPLE'S LIVES BASED ON HOPING THE PLAN WILL WORK OUT.

IT SHOULD BE BASED ON SOUND DATA STUDIES AND COUNTLESS RESEARCH.

THE PROBLEM WITH THIS PLAN IS THAT THERE HAVE BEEN NO STUDIES ON INFRASTRUCTURE, EQUITY, GENTRIFICATION, AND UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES AND ADDING AMENDMENTS THE DAY OF THE VOTE IS NOT BEING TRANSPARENT.

YOU DON'T DO STUDIES AFTER IMPLEMENTATION.

YOU DO THEM BEFORE.

THAT'S WHAT FORECASTING IS FOR.

THIS PLAN IS NOT ABOUT HOUSING THOUGH IT'S ABOUT LAND.

AND BY REZONING ALMOST THE ENTIRE CITY FROM SINGLE FAMILY TO MULTIFAMILY, YOU ARE EFFECTIVELY COLONIZING THE LAND THROUGH REZONING, TAKING IT OUT OF THE HANDS OF SINGLE FAMILY, HOMEOWNERS AND RENTERS AND GIVING IT BY LEGISLATIVE FORCE TO DEVELOPERS THAT IS WRONG.

SPECULATORS ARE ALREADY CIRCULATING.

AND AS A REALTOR IN SOMEONE ADEPT AT COMPETITIVE MARKET ANALYSIS AND COMPARATIVE CELLS, I KNOW WHAT WILL HAPPEN AS FOLKS START TO SELL, THE LAND VALUE WILL GO UP AND THAT'S THE ONLY THING YOU CAN'T PROTEST ON YOUR TAXES.

LANDLORDS WILL HAVE TO RAISE RENTS AND HOMEOWNERS THAT CAN'T AFFORD THE INCREASE WILL HAVE TO SELL.

THE AUSTIN MEDIAN INCOME IS 86,500, MAKING 80,000 THE MAX YOU CAN AFFORD AT 252,000 A TEACHER MAKES 55 FIREFIGHTER, 54 POLICE OFFICER 65.

OUR WASTE PICKUP PROFESSIONALS 39.

SO THIS IS FOR THE MIDDLE INCOME.

THE PEOPLE THAT MAKE OUR CITY TICK.

THE NEW HOUSING BUILT WILL NOT BE FOR THESE FOLKS.

RIGHT NOW.

A 500,000 HOME IN D FOUR WITH 20% DOWN WOULD HAVE A MORTGAGE PAYMENT OF $4,000 YOU WOULD NEED OF A, UH, INCOME OF 142,000 TO AFFORD IT.

FINANCIAL WEBSITE MOTLEY FOOL STATES THAT THE UPPER CLASS TOP 20% OF EARNERS MAKE 149,000.

THIS IS AN UPPER CLASS PLAN, NOT A MIDDLE INCOME PLAN.

WE HAVE AN UNDERSUPPLY OF TRULY AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND TO GET THAT DONE, IT WILL TAKE TARGETED POLICIES AND MONEY FROM THE GOVERNMENT TO MAKE AN IMPACT.

DEREGULATION AND TRICKLE DOWN HOME ECONOMICS DOES NOT WORK.

DO MORE AFFORDABLE PROJECTS WITH CITY LAND TRUST AND HOUSING PARTNERSHIPS.

MY FRIEND EMMA, A TEACHER AT A ISD AND SINGLE MOM PARTICIPATED IN ONE OF THESE PROGRAMS AND NOW SHE CAN LIVE CLOSER TO HER SCHOOL.

[03:10:01]

EXPAND THESE PROGRAMS, MAXIMIZE WHAT'S ALREADY CAPABLE.

TODAY, ALMOST EVERY SINGLE FAMILY LOT IS ALLOWED IN A DU.

HOMEOWNERS AREN'T TAKING ADVANTAGE BECAUSE THE PROCESS IS MIRED IN RED TAPE AND PROHIBITIVELY EXPENSIVE.

BRING DOWN PERMIT COSTS.

SIMPLIFY THE PROCESS.

PRE-APPROVED 10 TO 20 A DU PLANS THAT CAN BE FAST TRACKED THROUGH PERMITTING AND INSPECTIONS.

IT'S IRONIC THAT YOU'RE MANAGING THE OCCUPANCY OF THIS ROOM YET YOU WANT TO REMOVE OCCUPANCY SAFETY FOR RESIDENTS.

WE, WHAT WE'LL SEE ARE HIPSTER CO-OPS WHERE YOU EEK OUT MORE PROFIT PER BED A AKA PODS AND THAT WILL BE MORE MONEY THAN A A AIRBNB COULD EVER DREAM OF.

500 PER BED, 200 BUCK BEDS.

THAT'S 6,000 A MONTH IN A THREE BEDROOM HOUSE.

WHO'S ASKING FOR THAT? THE PEOPLE THAT WILL BE MOST IMPACTED ARE THE LABORERS AND THE PEOPLE WHO ARE WORKING.

AND I'M HERE FOR MY PEOPLE.

THE LOW INCOME, THE LABORERS, THE BLACK, THE BROWN, THE ELDERLY, THOSE ON FIXED INCOME DON'T RUIN AND DISPLACE YOUR CONSTITUENTS WHEN IMPACT HASN'T BEEN STUDIED.

I CANNOT JUSTIFY PUSHING OUT THE POOR SO THAT HIGH INCOME EARNERS CAN FEEL EMPOWERED TO TAKE PEOPLE'S LAND.

THIS IS WRONG.

VOTE NO.

AND POSTPONE.

DO MORE STUDIES.

PLEASE PROCEED.

STATE YOUR NAME AT THE PODIUM.

THANK YOU.

LET'S GO TO OUR NEXT SPEAKER AND AS, AS ASKED EARLIER, SNAPS ALSO GET YOUR POINT ACROSS AND GET US MOVING SO THAT EVERYONE HAS A CHANCE TO SPEAK TODAY PLEASE.

OKAY.

UM, HI.

UH, MY NAME IS LISA WIMBERLEY.

I LIVE IN DISTRICT SEVEN AND I'M HERE IN SUPPORT OF THE HOME PROPOSAL.

I'VE BEEN LIVING IN MY HOUSE FOR NEARLY 30 YEARS AND IN THAT TIME I'VE SEEN MANY INITIATIVES THAT ARE MEANT TO MOVE OUR CITY FORWARD TOWARD PROGRESS LIKE BIKE LANES, ADUS, CODE NEXT AND EVEN SIDEWALKS.

AND THESE ARE ALWAYS MET WITH THE SAME NEGATIVITY AND ALMOST ALWAYS FROM THE SAME PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN TRYING FOR YEARS TO STOP PROGRESS AT EVERY STEP OF THE WAY.

OFTEN RESORTING TO SCARE TACTICS, FEARMONGERING MISINFORMATION, CONSPIRACY THEORIES, EV EVEN LAWSUITS SUCH AS THE MIND-BOGGLING LAWSUIT AGAINST AFFORDABILITY UNLOCKED.

I'VE COME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT IT DOESN'T MATTER HOW MUCH TIME WE SPEND DISCUSSING, LISTENING, TRYING TO CONVINCE, SHOWING DATA AND SCIENCE AND VAST NUMBER OF ACADEMIC STUDIES THAT SUPPORT ANY GIVEN STEP TOWARD PROGRESS.

WE WILL NEVER CONVINCE PEOPLE WHO DON'T WANT TO BE CONVINCED, WHO USE FEAR AND UN SCRUPULOUS SCARE TACTICS AS A METHOD TO GET THEIR WAY WHO ARE ONLY INTERESTED IN THEIR MY, THEIR OWN MYOPIC SELF-SERVING VIEW.

I'M HERE TO ENCOURAGE YOU TO LOOK PAST THIS AND TO SEE HOW MUCH SUPPORT THERE IS FOR THE HOME ORDINANCE.

IT IS VAST.

OUR CITY, OUR CONSTITUENTS, YOUR CONSTITUENTS NEED THIS.

OBJECTIVELY SPEAKING, RELATIVELY MODEST PROPOSAL CHANGE PROPOSED CHANGED.

IF YOU DON'T TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE MOMENTUM AND THIS OVERWHELMING SUPPORT NOW, WE MAY HAVE TO WAIT A GENERATION TO MAKE IT HAPPEN AND YOUR CONSTITUENTS WILL SUFFER FOR IT.

PLEASE DON'T LET THE USUAL DETRACTORS SWAY YOUR RESOLVE.

DO THE RIGHT THING FOR THE CITY, FOR THE CLIMATE, FOR THE YOUNG GENERATION AND PASS THE HOMES PROPOSAL.

THANK YOU.

HELLO, MY NAME IS TINA BARRETT.

UM, .

I'M A 20 YEAR RESIDENT OF ROSEDALE IN DISTRICT SEVEN.

AND I'M HAPPY TO ADMIT I'M ALSO A DEVELOPER.

I BUILD URBAN HOMES ON SMALL LOTS IN THE CITY CORPS.

I REALLY WANT TO KEEP DOING THIS TO MAKE A LIVING AND SUPPORT MY FAMILY.

SO I'M IN FAVOR OF THE HOME INITIATIVE.

CITY COUNCIL AND STAFF HAVE SAID WE NEED A LOT MORE HOUSING TO SUPPORT OUR GROWING CITY AND STAVE OFF RISING HOUSING PRICES.

NOT ONLY THAT, BUT WE NEED TO HAVE MORE DIVERSE HOUSING TYPES TO MAKE HOUSING MORE AFFORDABLE.

THE STATE OF TEXAS ISN'T GOING TO DO THIS.

ORDINARY CITIZENS AREN'T GOING TO DO THIS AND THE CITY CAN'T DO THIS ALONE.

WE, THE DEVELOPERS ARE THE ONES WHO YOU ARE DEPENDING ON TO MAKE THIS HAPPEN.

YET MY CENTRAL AUSTIN NEIGHBORS WANT TO MAKE IT HARDER TO BUILD SMALL HOUSES ON SMALL LOTS.

THEY BELIEVE THE ONLY, THAT ONLY SINGLE FAMILY HOMES BELONG IN CENTRAL AUSTIN.

AND SURE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ARE THE EASIEST AND CHEAPEST THING TO BUILD.

I CAN EASILY BUILD MORE HOMES NOW THAT SELL FAR WELL INTO THE MILLIONS LIKE THE ONES GOING UP IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD IN ROSEDALE.

THIS IS NOT WHAT I WANT TO BUILD.

GIVE ME THE TOOLS TO BUILD TRIPLEXES, FOURPLEXES, COTTAGE COURTS AND TOWN HOMES.

THE MORE BARRIERS THAT ARE IN PLACE, THE MORE DEVELOPERS LIKE ME WILL THROW UP OUR HANDS AND GIVE YOU MIL, MULTIMILLION DOLLAR MANSIONS AND KEEP OUR NEIGHBORHOODS ONLY FOR THE RICH BOARD.

AFFORDABILITY ISN'T THE ONLY ISSUE.

I THINK MANY OF MY ROSEDALE AND DALE LA NEIGHBORS WOULD AGREE THAT CLIMATE CHANGE IS A MAJOR ISSUE FACING ALL OF US.

ACCORDING TO ANALYSIS BY THE NEW YORK TIMES AVERAGE NEIGHBORHOOD DENSITY IN THE AUSTIN METRO AREA FELL BY 5% IN RECENT YEARS.

THE SECOND HIGHEST DECLINE IN THE NATION SAN ANTONIO IS FIRST BECAUSE OF ALL THAT SPRAWL.

AUSTIN LEADS THE STATE'S MAJOR METRO AREAS IN THE AVERAGE NUMBER OF MILES DRIVEN DAILY ACCORDING TO TXDOT AND THE ZONING LAWS WE HAVE NOW ONLY PUSH HOME BUYERS FURTHER AND FURTHER TO THE SUBURBS WHERE THE MILES DRIVEN DAILY

[03:15:01]

WILL ONLY GO UP.

OUR CITY ISN'T AFFORDABLE, OUR PLANET IS ON FIRE.

WE CANNOT KEEP THE STATUS QUO.

THANK YOU MARK KIRK.

GOOD MORNING.

I LIVE WITH MY WIFE AND 10-YEAR-OLD SON IN A 1952 HOME COMPLETE WITH A CRUMBLING FOUNDATION IN DISTRICT SEVEN.

WE DESPERATELY WANT TO REMAIN IN AUSTIN.

WE ALL WANT AFFORDABLE HOUSING, BUT THERE ARE NO PROVISIONS IN THIS ORDINANCE TO ENSURE THIS.

WHEN NINE TO 12 UNITS CAN BE CITED ON A LOT LAND VALUES AND PROPERTY TAXES WILL SKYROCKET.

DISPLACING AUSTIN RESIDENTS, ESPECIALLY FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES OF COLOR.

MM-HMM , AMEN.

THOSE NINE TO 12 UNITS WILL MOSTLY BE REYNOLDS OWNED BY INVESTORS, NOT INDIVIDUALS OR FAMILIES.

THIS IS NOT THE PATH TO INCREASED HOME OWNERSHIP OR AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

THERE'S NOTHING IN THIS ORDINANCE TO PREVENT THIS.

AND WE KNOW FROM THE LAST 25 YEARS OF AUSTIN REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT THAT THIS IS WHAT WILL HAPPEN.

DEREGULATION IS ALWAYS EXPLOITED BY A FREE MARKET.

WHEN THE EFFECTS BECOME APPARENT, THREE GROUPS ARE GOING TO BE EXTREMELY ANGRY.

FIRST COMMUNITIES OF COLOR IN EAST AUSTIN WHO ARE BEING DISPLACED BY THE EXTRAORDINARILY DEVELOP EXTRAORDINARY DEVELOPMENT PRESSURE, ASPIRING HOMEOWNERS WHO FIND THAT THEY ARE STILL PAYING EXORBITANT RENTS FOR THOSE INVESTOR OWNED UNITS AND MIDDLE CLASS HOMEOWNERS AND FAMILIES LIKE MY OWN, WHO ARE BEING FORCED OUT OF AUSTIN BY CRUSHING PROPERTY TAXES FROM BEING COMPED AGAINST AN EXISTING HOME THAT WAS SOLD, DEMOLISHED AND TURNED INTO 12 UNITS.

MAYOR WATSON AND COUNCIL MEMBERS, I BEG YOU TO THINK ABOUT THE PEOPLE WHO LIVE, WORK AND RAISE FAMILIES HERE.

IF YOU APPROVE THIS ORDINANCE AS IT STANDS WITHOUT ADDRESSING INVESTOR EXPLOITATION THAT WILL OCCUR, YOU'LL BE KNOWN AS THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL THAT CREATED AN UNPRECEDENTED INVESTOR HANDOUT AT THE EXPENSE OF AUSTINITES, PARTICULARLY PEOPLE OF COLOR AND MIDDLE CLASS FAMILIES.

PLEASE TAKE A STEP BACK, POSTPONE AND WORK TOWARDS A BETTER SOLUTION.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU, THANK YOU.

LET'S HEAR FROM OUR NEXT SPEAKER.

THANK YOU.

NEXT SPEAKER.

GOOD AFTERNOON COUNSEL.

UM, THANK YOU FOR LETTING ME SPEAK HERE TODAY.

MY NAME IS LAN ANI.

I AM A PROUD RENTER AND DISTRICT NINE AND I'M AN ENTHUSIASTIC SUPPORTER OF HOME.

I WANT TO THANK COUNCIL FOR THEIR LEADERSHIP, ESPECIALLY THE CO-SPONSORS OF HOME, INCLUDING COUNCIL MEMBER LESLIE POOLE AND MAYOR WATSON ON THIS, ON TAKING THE INITIATIVE TO TACKLE THE AFFORDABILITY CRISIS.

MY PARENTS IMMIGRATED AS REFUGEES AFTER THEY WERE KICKED OUT OF AFRICA BECAUSE OF THE COLOR OF THEIR SKIN.

AND THEIR FIRST HOME WAS A DUPLEX THEY RENTED.

AND IN THAT DUPLEX, THEY MADE A HOME FOR THEMSELVES AND MY FAMILY.

THAT DUPLEX WAS OUR HOME.

A DUPLEX IS A HOME, A TRIPLEX IS A HOME, AN APARTMENT IS A HOME, AND A SINGLE FAMILY IS A HOME.

A HOME IS A HOME IS A HOME.

AND I AM WONDERING IF MY FAMILY INSTEAD CAME IN 2023 TO AUSTIN AS REFUGEES IF THEY COULD FIND A HOME FOR THEMSELVES HERE.

AND IF NOT, WHY ARE WE NOT BUILDING HOMES FOR PEOPLE LIKE MY FAMILY? AND WHERE WILL WE BE BUILT THEM? WILL YOU ALLOW THEM TO BE BUILT IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD? SO I'M ASKING COUNCIL TODAY TO SUPPORT THIS INITIATIVE FOR PEOPLE LIKE MY FAMILY AND THE PEOPLE WHO WANT COME TO THE CITY FOR VARIOUS REASONS, EITHER AS REFUGEES OR AS ASPIRING ARTISTS OR AS ENTREPRENEURS OR PEOPLE WHO WANNA WORK IN OUR CITY AND MAKE IT GREAT.

LET'S BUILD HOMES FOR THEM, WHETHER THOSE HOMES BE DUPLEXES OR TRIPLEXES OR APARTMENTS OR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES.

THANK YOU.

I'LL BE CALLING THE NEXT FIVE SPEAKERS.

PLEASE LISTEN FOR YOUR NAME.

YOU'RE ONLY BEING CALLED ONCE, RILEY PATTERSON, NORA EZ MOELLER.

KIM COOK, DWAYNE REED, A WISE AZAR, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AT THE PODIUM AND APPROACH ANY OF THE, UM, AVAILABLE PODIUMS. IF YOUR NAME WAS JUST CALLED, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO COME ON DOWN SO YOU'RE CLOSE TO A MICROPHONE.

GO AHEAD.

HI, I'M RILEY PATTERSON.

I'M A RESIDENT OF TERRYTOWN IN DISTRICT 10.

UM, THANK YOU MAYOR AND COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERING THIS MEASURE IN FRONT OF US TODAY.

UM, AS WE'RE ALL TOO AWARE, HOME OWNERSHIP IS SLIPPING OUT OF THE REACH FOR AN INCREASING PROPORTION OF AUSTINITES.

UM, I'M HERE TODAY TO ENCOURAGE YOU TO SUPPORT HOME AND THE PHASE ONE IS A CRITICAL FIRST STEP IN TACKLING THIS AFFORDABILITY CRISIS.

UH, I LOVE MY NEIGHBORHOOD.

UH, THE BLOCK I'M ON HAS A NUMBER OF ADUS AND

[03:20:01]

SMALLER HOMES, INCLUDING MINE ON A 2,700 SQUARE FOOT LOT, UH, THAT HAVE PROVIDED OPPORTUNITIES FOR NEWER RESIDENTS THAT OTHERWISE MIGHT NOT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO AFFORD TO, UH, UH, TO, TO JOIN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD.

UM, IT'S THE MOST WALKABLE PART OF TARRYTOWN.

IT'S NEAR DEEP PETTY, A NUMBER OF RESTAURANTS, A NUMBER OF SHOPS, UM, AND A NUMBER OF OTHER, UH, UNITS IN THE AREA ARE UNABLE TO BE BUILT BECAUSE THEY WEREN'T BUILT BEFORE THE 1984 CODE OR BECAUSE WE, THERE, YOU'RE ALREADY BUILT IN A DU AND THERE ARE ONLY TWO UNITS ON THE, THERE ARE ALREADY TWO UNITS ON THE LOT.

UH, THIS PHASE ONE WOULD ALLOW FOR MORE DENSITY IN THIS AREA THAT OBVIOUSLY COULD BENEFIT FROM THAT DENSITY WHERE, UM, IT'S, UH, UH, IT WOULD ALLOW ACCESS TO PEOPLE THAT OTHERWISE MIGHT NOT SEE HOME OWNERSHIP AS A POSSIBILITY FOR THEM IN 2020 THREES AUSTIN.

UM, IT'S, I, I, UM, I, I I'M ALSO LOOKING FORWARD TO THIS ENABLING PHASE TWO AND ALLOWING FOR MORE LOTS TO SPLIT LIKE OURS HAVE BEFORE THE 1984 CODE, UH, BECAUSE I THINK THAT, UM, THE, THE, THE CURRENT LOT SIZE JUST DOESN'T MAKE SENSE FOR WHAT THE CURRENT LAND VALUES ARE IN AUSTIN.

UM, I APPRECIATE YOUR CONSIDERATION TODAY AND, UM, UM, YIELD THE REST OF MY TIME.

THANK YOU.

HI, MY, MY NAME IS NORA LEE NOTEZ MILLER.

I'M THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF HOUSING WORKS AUSTIN.

WE ARE A 5 0 1 C3 ORGANIZATION THAT FOCUSES ON RESEARCH, EDUCATIONAL INITIATIVES AND ADVOCACY AROUND HOUSING AFFORDABILITY IN THE TOWN, IN THIS TOWN AND IN THE REGION.

HOUSING WORKS.

AUSTIN SUPPORTS ADOPTION OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO IMPLEMENT PHASE ONE OF THE HOME OPTIONS FOR MIDDLE INCOME EMPOWERMENT, THE HOME INITIATIVE AND THE REMOVAL OF DWELLING UNIT OCCUPANCY LIMITS.

THESE AMENDMENTS WOULD ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A GREATER DIVERSITY OF HOUSING TYPES AND LIVING ARRANGEMENTS THAN CURRENTLY ALLOWED IN SINGLE FAMILY ZONE DISTRICTS, WHICH WOULD INCREASE ACCESS TO ATTAINABLE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR HOUSEHOLDS AT A RANGE OF INCOME, ESPECIALLY FOR FIRST TIME HOME BUYERS AND SENIORS FOR OUR ESSENTIAL WORKERS, TEACHERS, FIREFIGHTERS, POLICE OFFICERS WISHING TO REMAIN IN THEIR COMMUNITIES AND INCREASE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES IN HIGH OPPORTUNITY AREAS.

WE FURTHER RECOMMEND THAT THE COUNCIL CONSIDER PROVIDING DIRECTION TO CITY STAFF TO INCREASE ACCESS TO PROGRAMS THAT ENSURE LOW AND MODERATE INCOME.

HOMEOWNERS ARE ABLE TO AVAIL THEMSELVES OF INCREASED DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF SINGLE FAMILY LOTS AND ARE PROTECTED FROM PREDATORY REAL ESTATE ACTIVITIES.

HOUSING WORKS TAGLINE IS ALL KINDS OF HOMES IN ALL PARTS OF TOWN FOR ALL KINDS OF PEOPLE.

THE HOME INITIATIVE SPEAKS CLEARLY TO THIS TAGLINE AND WE URGE PASSAGE OF THIS IMPORTANT EFFORT.

WE THANK THE COUNCIL AND COUNCIL MEMBER POOLE FOR, UH, MOVING FORWARD ON YOUR LEADERSHIP ON THIS INITIATIVE.

THANK YOU.

GO AHEAD, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME.

HELLO, MY NAME IS KIM TYSON COOK.

I'M HERE IN OPPOSITION OF HOME.

I'VE LIVED IN AUSTIN FOR MORE THAN 40 YEARS, INCLUDING 31 IN MY HOUSE IN NORTHWEST TILLS.

FOR 20 YEARS I WAS A BUSINESS REPORTER CO COVERING AUSTIN REAL ESTATE.

LIKE MANY HOMEOWNERS, WHEN I RECEIVED THIS LAVENDER POSTCARD IN THE MAIL WITH MY JUNK MAIL, I DIDN'T THINK IT WAS MUCH OF CONSEQUENCE.

I WOULD LOOK AT IT LATER.

THAT WAS ALL THE NOTICE THAT I AND 170,000 HOMEOWNERS IN AUSTIN HAVE RECEIVED ABOUT WHAT IS A VERY CONSEQUENTIAL CHANGE.

I WOULD VENTURE TO SAY 80% OF AUSTIN RESIDENTS PROBABLY HAVE NO IDEA WHAT'S IN HOME AND ALL THE DETAILS, HOW'S IT GONNA AFFECT THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD? THERE WAS NO CITYWIDE VOTE ON SOMETHING THAT WOULD AFFECT EVERY SINGLE LOT IN THIS CITY.

THERE WAS NO OUTREACH TO NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS TO GET THEIR FEEDBACK.

MY NEIGHBORHOOD GROUP ONLY HAD ITS MEETING THE DAY AFTER THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING ON THIS.

I CAME DOWN TO THAT NOVEMBER 14TH PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FULLY INTENDING TO SPEAK, BUT INSTEAD DECIDE I'D LISTENED TO THE FIVE HOURS OF TESTIMONY.

WHAT I HEARD WAS CITY COUNCIL STAFF SAYING NO STUDIES HAD BEEN COMPLETED TO UNDERSTAND THE IMPACT OF THIS ON THE ENVIRONMENT, ON UTILITIES, ON FIRE, ON SCHOOLS.

THE CITY WOULD HAVE NO POWER TO ENFORCE DEEDED RESTRICTIONS AND HOMEOWNERS WOULD BE LEFT OFFEND FOR THEMSELVES, SUING THEIR NEIGHBORS.

I HEARD EAST SIDE RESIDENTS WORRIED ABOUT POTENTIAL FOR FUTURE FLOODING, THAT THEY HAD NO DEEDED RESTRICTIONS.

THERE WAS NOTHING IN HOME TO ENSURE THAT ACTUAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING WOULD BE BUILT.

I DUG MORE AND FOUND THERE WAS NO STUDIES OF WHETHER THIS KIND OF URBANIZATION ACTUALLY PRODUCES AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

I HAVE REALTOR FRIENDS WHO TELL ME THEY'VE DONE THE NUMBERS AND IT STILL DOES NOT RESORT RESULT IN AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

AN URBAN INSTITUTE REPORT IN MARCH LOOKED AT 1,136 CITIES THAT TRIED

[03:25:01]

SOMETHING LIKE THIS.

WE FIND NO STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT EVIDENCE, ADDITIONAL LOWER COST UNITS BECOME AVAILABLE.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

YOUR TIME HAS EXPIRED.

LET'S GO