[00:00:02]
[CALL TO ORDER]
CHAMBERS AND VIRTUALLY, I CALL THIS MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO ORDER AT 6:04 PM AND FIRST WE ARE GOING TO TAKE ROLE.SO JUST ACKNOWLEDGE YOUR PRESENCE WHEN I CALL YOUR NAME.
AND I'LL GO IN ORDER AS I SEE IT ON THE AGENDA.
WE HAVE A FULL HOUSE THIS EVENING.
UM, I'M ALSO RECOGNIZING OUR CHAIR BOARD ADJUSTMENT.
ALRIGHT, WELL YOU, WE'LL SEE SOME NEW FACES THIS EVENING.
UM, SO I WANT TO TAKE A MOMENT TO, UM, WELCOME OUR NEW COMMISSIONERS, POWELL HILLER AND LAN.
AND SO, UM, I'LL GO START ON THE RIGHT HAND SIDE.
COMMISSIONER POWELL, WOULD YOU LIKE TO INTRODUCE YOURSELF? NO, OF COURSE.
FIRST THING YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT ME AND WHY I'M SERVING ON PLAN.
JUST THAT I LOVE AUSTIN, TEXAS.
IT IS A CITY THAT I WAS BORN IN ST.
DAVID'S HOSPITAL RIGHT OFF OF 35.
THE CITY THAT MY PARENTS MET IN AND GOT MARRIED IN THE JAPANESE GARDEN IN ER.
AND SO FOR ME IT'S ABOUT GIVING BACK TO OUR CITY, MAKING IT A BETTER PLACE EVERY DAY.
IN TERMS OF WORK EXPERIENCE, I BRING WHOLE BUNCH FROM COMMUNITY ORGANIZING TO TEACHER RECRUITING, TO A WHOLE LOT OF LOCAL ADVOCACY ON THESE ISSUES.
AND THEN CURRENTLY THOUGH, I'M ALWAYS JUST SPEAKING FOR MYSELF AS A VOLUNTEER HERE.
I SERVE AS THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE AUSTIN HISTORY CENTER ASSOCIATION, WHICH IS THE NONPROFIT THAT SUPPORTS AUSTIN HISTORY CENTER.
SO I'M EXCITED TO SOUND OFF AND CONTRIBUTE TO THESE IMPORTANT ISSUES AND BE A PART OF THE PROCESS.
AND I ALSO HAVE TO THANK COUNCIL MEMBER SIEGEL FOR APPOINTING ME AND THE TWO CHAIRS WHO WERE IN THE SEAT BEFORE ME.
RYAN JOHNSON, WHO'S HERE TODAY.
AND THEN TODD SHAW, WHO DID FANTASTIC JOBS AND LOVE ME.
I BE A LOT QUICKER THAN ADAM 'CAUSE I'M UNCOMFORTABLE ALREADY.
I AM A LONG TIME RESIDENT OF AUSTIN.
CAME HERE TO GO TO THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT THIS POINT, ALMOST 30 YEARS AGO.
I HAVE A 11 YEAR, SORRY, 8-YEAR-OLD AND A 6-YEAR-OLD JAMES AND OLIVIA.
AND I AM REALLY EXCITED ABOUT GIVING A CHANCE TO PARTICIPATE AND, UH, HOPEFULLY EVERYBODY WILL BEAR WITH ME WITH THE, UH, INEVITABLE LEARNING CURVE.
I'M STILL IN THE LEARNING CURVE.
I GREW UP IN EL PASO AND I'VE BEEN LIVING IN AUSTIN FOR EIGHT YEARS.
I'M CURRENTLY A TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT MANAGER AT CAT METRO.
I WORK ON A LOT OF PROJECTS WHERE TRANSIT INTERSECTS WITH HOUSING AND POLICY.
I'M REALLY EXCITED TO BE HERE AND I'M MOM TO TWO LITTLE BOYS WHO ARE BORN AND RAISED IN AUSTIN.
AND I DO WANNA GIVE A COMMISSIONER JOHNSON AN OPPORTUNITY TO SAY GOODBYE.
IT'S WEIRD BEING ON THIS SIDE.
YOU'RE ALL SO MUCH TALLER FROM DOWN HERE.
JUST THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR HAVING ME FOR THE LAST, UH, 14 MONTHS OR SO IN THE COMMISSION, ALTHOUGH IT FELT A LOT LONGER THAN THAT.
JUST PLEASURE TO SERVE THE CITY IN THIS CAPACITY.
UM, I'M JUST SO INSPIRED BY ALL OF YOU FOR STANDING UP AND VOLUNTEERING TO DO THIS.
I, I THINK A LOT OF PEOPLE I WAS JUST SPEAKING WITH, UH, A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC, PHILIP WILEY.
UH, A LOT OF PEOPLE DON'T REALIZE HOW MUCH WORK ALL OF THE MEMBERS OF PLANNING COMMISSION AND ALL OF THE CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS PUT IN, INCLUDING OUR STAFF AND THE LIAISONS.
UM, AND I JUST THINK IT'S SO EN ENCOURAGING TO SEE THAT THERE ARE SO MANY PEOPLE WILLING TO STEP UP AND DO THAT WORK TO MAKE THEIR COMMUNITY A BETTER PLACE.
SO THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR LETTING ME BE A PART OF THAT AND KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK.
UM, I DID WANT TO JUST ACKNOWLEDGE AND THANK, HONESTLY COMMISSIONER JOHNSON, YOUR WRITER'S BEEN 14 MONTHS, IT FEEL LIKE YEARS, UM, THAT WE SERVE WITH YOU.
AND I THINK JUST THE KNOWLEDGE AND GRAVITY THAT YOU BOUGHT BROUGHT TO THIS DI FROM THE WORK THAT YOU'VE BEEN DOING, BUT ALSO JUST YOUR ABILITY TO REALLY DIG INTO DETAILS AND HAVE THOSE CONVERSATIONS.
I JUST WANNA THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE, NOT JUST OF COURSE TO THE DISTRICT, BUT ALSO TO THE CITY AT LARGE.
AND I WANNA SAY, UM, YOU KNOW, EVEN IF IT WAS 14 MONTHS, I FEEL LIKE YOU, THE IMPRINTS THAT YOU HAVE LEFT ON A LOT OF DIFFERENT POLICIES THAT WERE WORKED ON, THOSE WILL LIVE WAY BEYOND THAT.
AND I JUST REALLY WANNA THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE.
[00:05:07]
ALRIGHT, WELL WE'LL MOVE INTO OUR MEETING.SO AS USUAL, TONIGHT'S MEETING WILL BE HYBRID, ALLOWING FOR A VIRTUAL QUORUM.
UM, WE ONLY HAVE ONE PERSON COMMISSIONER HOWARD VIRTUAL TONIGHT.
SO IT'S ALMOST LIKE PRE COVID TIMES.
I'M NOT TRYING TO CALL YOU OUT, COMMISSIONER HOWARD
SO, UM, SIMILARLY, SPEAKERS CAN PRESENT FROM THE CHAMBERS OR PARTICIPATE VIRTUALLY.
AND COMMISSIONER HOWARD, JUST REMEMBER TO HAVE YOUR, SEND YOUR SIGN IN SHEET TO OUR STAFF LIAISON AND HAVE YOUR YELLOW, GREEN, RED, AND YELLOW ITEMS FOR VOTING.
AND IF I MISS YOU, JUST COME OFF MUTE AND LET ME KNOW THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK, UM, TO OUR, UM, THE PUBLIC THAT'S HERE.
IF YOU'RE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK, YOU SHOULD RECEIVE AN EMAIL PRIOR TO THE COMMISSION TAKING UP YOUR ITEM AND SPEAKERS CAN DONATE, DONATE TIME, BOTH THE SPEAKER DONATING TIME AND THE SPEAKER RECIPIENT, FORGIVE ME, MUST BE IN PRESENT IN PERSON WHEN THE ITEM IS CONSIDERED.
SO I WILL HAVE ASSISTANCE FROM MS. GARCIA IN ANNOUNCING THE SPEAKERS DURING OUR PUBLIC HEARINGS.
[PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL ]
WE HAVE ANYONE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK DURING PUBLIC COMMUNICATION? YES.OUR FIRST SPEAKER SIGN IN FOR PUBLIC COMMUNICATION IS STEWART, HARRY HIRSCH.
STEWART, YOU WILL HAVE THREE MINUTES CHAIR.
MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, I USED TO SAY MY NAME WAS STUART HIRSCH, BUT NOW I SAY STUART HARRY HIRSCH.
'CAUSE THERE'S A HEDGE FUND GUY IN BOSTON WHO SPELLS IT THE SAME WAY.
AND I DON'T WANT TO BE CONFUSED WITH HIM.
UH, THE CITY COUNCIL ON APRIL 20TH, 2000 APPROVED SMART HOUSING ORDINANCE.
IT REPLACED THE FORMER AFFORDABLE HOUSING POLICY OF THE LAST CENTURY.
BUT IT WASN'T JUST 'CAUSE IT WASN'T STUPID HOUSING.
LIKE THE POLICIES OF THE LAST CENTURY.
SMART ACTUALLY STOOD FOR SAFE MIXED INCOME, ACCESSIBLE, REASONABLY PRICED AND TRANSIT ORIENTED.
AND LAST YEAR I APPEARED BEFORE YOU ALMOST EVERY MONTH TOTALLY UNSUCCESSFULLY TO ARGUE THAT THE AFFORDABILITY PERIOD FOR SMART SHOULD MOVE FROM THE FIVE YEARS ESTABLISHED 25 YEARS AGO TO 40 YEARS, WHICH WE'VE HAD AT THE UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOOD OVERLAY FOR A LONG TIME.
REASONABLY PRICED MEANS THAT THE FAMILY HOUSEHOLD INCOME IS NOT MORE THAN 80% MEDIUM FAMILY INCOME, AND IT ALSO MEANS THAT THEY'RE NOT SPENDING MORE THAN 30% ON THEIR MORTGAGE OR RENT.
SO WHEN WE TALK ABOUT AFFORDABILITY BEFORE HERE, WE OFTEN TALK ABOUT INCOME RESTRICTED HOUSING, WHICH IS NOT THE SAME AS SMART HOUSING BECAUSE INCOME RESTRICTED HOUSING DOESN'T PUT A RESTRICTION ON THE MAXIMUM RENT OR MORTGAGE JUST PUTS A RESTRICTION ON THE INCOME.
SO I'M COMING BACK TO YOU IN 2025.
I STARTED WORKING HERE AT THE BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT HERE AT 3 0 1 WEST SECOND STREET IN 1977.
UH, AND I WAS ONE OF ABOUT A DOZEN CITY EMPLOYEES WHO WROTE THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND CONCURRENTLY ALL THE CRITERIA MANUALS AT THE SAME TIME.
SO I FEEL IT'S MY JOB AS A RETIREE TO SHOW UP EVERY NOW AND THEN AND POINT OUT TO YOU WHAT I THINK WILL BE A GOOD PATH TO PURSUE AND IN A GOOD PATH TO AVOID.
I ALSO WANNA HIGHLIGHT FOR YOU THIS, THIS MONTH, THE BLOOMBERG BUSINESS WEEK HAS AN INTERESTING ARTICLE ON THE IMPACTS OF, UH, THE PATTERNS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN AND AT COMMUNITY COLLEGES THROUGHOUT THE STATE OF TEXAS.
IT'S THE APRIL EDITION, AND I THOUGHT YOU'D BE INTERESTED IN THAT.
AND THE OTHER THING I WANT TO BRAG ABOUT MY COUNCIL DISTRICT, I TELL PEOPLE I'M STEW FROM DISTRICT TWO.
UH, I BELIEVE DISTRICT TWO HAS THE HIGHEST PERCENTAGE OF HOME OWNERSHIP.
I BELIEVE THAT DISTRICT TWO ALSO HAS THE HIGHEST PERCENTAGE OF HISPANIC RESIDENTS OF ANY DISTRICT IN THE CITY.
AND MY PARTICULAR ZIP CODE, ACCORDING TO THE DATA I'VE RECEIVED IN THE LAST MONTH, OUR HOME SALE PRICES HAVE DROPPED MORE THAN $50,000 IN A YEAR.
SO IT MAY BE INTERESTING AS YOU DISCUSS, UH, TONIGHT AND ON FUTURE AGENDAS, WHAT SHOULD BE THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING GOALS OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN THAT YOU REMEMBER THAT SMART HOUSING IS THE ADOPTED POLICY HASN'T BEEN REPEALED, STILL IN PLACE AND REASONABLY PRICED IS IMPORTANT.
OUR NEXT SPEAKER FOR PUBLIC COMMUNICATION IS PHILIP WILEY.
PHILLIP, YOU WILL HAVE THREE MINUTES.
UH, FIRST OF ALL, THANK YOU EVERYONE.
CONGRATULATIONS TO THE NEW MEMBERS, UH, AND TO THOSE THAT ARE LEAVING US SOON.
UH, A LOT OF GRATITUDE FOR ALL YOUR WORK UP THERE.
UH, AND ANYBODY THAT GOT AN AWARD, IT WAS VERY WELL DESERVED.
UM, I AM HERE TO TALK ABOUT SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT AND HOW IT APPLIES TO THE,
[00:10:01]
UM, AUSTIN LAND CODE.UM, AND I'M CALLING THIS DISCUSSION, WHICH I'M IN THE MIDDLE OF, WHICH MAY BE TO SOME OF YOUR RELIEF, UH, SCM 8 61 IN RECOGNITION OF, UH, UH, A RESOLUTION THAT WENT FORWARD IN DECEMBER, UH, PROMOTING, UH, UM, CONTINUING EDUCATION AT ALL LEVELS, INCLUDING COMMISSIONS AND, UH, COUNCIL.
UM, UH, TODAY I'M GONNA FOCUS ON MOBIL MOBILITY ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT.
UM, THE LAST TIME I WAS HERE, WE, I SORT OF HIT THE THREE MINUTE MARK WHEN I, I TRIED TO MAKE THE POINT THAT, UH, THERE ARE TWO KINDS OF WALK SHEDS THAT, THAT YOU ALL MIGHT WANT TO GET FAMILIAR WITH.
THE FIRST IS WHAT WE WOULD CALL A TRANSIT WALK.
SHE, AND THAT'S WHAT WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT IN EAD.
UM, I'M HERE TO TALK ABOUT SOMETHING THAT'S MORE OF A CENTER WALK SHED, WHICH I'M REFERRING TO AS A MOBILITY ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT INSTEAD OF TODD, UH, MOD.
UM, AND, AND JUST QUICKLY ON THIS CHART, I'VE TRIED TO, UH, AT, AT A SIMPLE LEVEL EXPLAIN THE DIFFERENCES.
A TRANSIT WALK SHED, YOU WALK SOMEPLACE AND, AND SOME PEOPLE THINK 10 MINUTES IS A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF WALK TO A TRANSIT STATION.
WHEN YOU GET THERE, YOU WAIT, YOU WAIT FOR MAYBE FIVE MINUTES, THAT WOULD BE A GOOD WAIT.
THEN YOU TAKE TRANSIT AND THAT'S GONNA TAKE TIME.
AND THEN YOU WALK SOMEWHERE ELSE ALTOGETHER.
THIS TRIP COUNT IS GOING TO BE REASONABLY AT LEAST 20 MINUTES, UH, A CENTER WALK SHED.
YOU GET OUT, YOU, YOU HAVE YOUR SHOES ON AND YOU WALK AND YOU GET THERE.
SO OBVIOUSLY, UH, 10 MINUTES ISN'T THE RIGHT BENCHMARK THERE.
15 TO 20 MINUTES IS PROBABLY A MORE REALISTIC, UH, STARTING POINT TO, TO THINK ABOUT THAT.
AND JUST AS A PRACTICE EXERCISE, IF, IF YOU THINK ABOUT SOME OF THE TRIPS YOU'VE TAKEN THAT INVOLVE THE AIRPORT, UM, THINK ABOUT ALL THE STEPS THAT ARE INVOLVED THERE.
JUST GETTING TO THE AIRPORT IS, IS THE BEGINNING OF THE JOURNEY.
THIS IS A, UH, MOBILITY ORIENTED WALK SHED THAT HAS AS A CENTER, UH, 2006 LEONA, WHICH IS IN EAST AUSTIN BY THE, THE BASEBALL STADIUM, UH, COMPLEX.
UT IS PUTTING UP, UH, AT LEAST TWO UH, BUILDINGS OVER THERE.
AND THIS IS WHAT YOU WOULD, UH, ENVISION AS A 0.75 MILE OR 15 MINUTE WALK FROM WHERE THOSE BUILDINGS ARE GONNA BE.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS CHAIR.
THAT CONCLUDES THE SPEAKERS FOR PUBLIC COMMUNICATION.
[Consent Agenda]
OUR CONSENT AGENDA IS APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FROM THE TWO MEETINGS MARCH 11TH AND MARCH 25TH.DOES ANYONE HAVE EDITS TO THOSE MINUTES? ALL RIGHT.
HEARING NONE THOSE MINUTES AS ARE POSTED IN THE BACKUP WILL BE ADDED TO THE CONSENT AGENDA, SO WE'LL MOVE ON.
OUR FIRST ACTIVITY TODAY IS TO VOTE ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.
ITEMS THAT ARE CONSENT APPROVAL, DISAPPROVAL, POSTPONEMENTS OF PUBLIC HEARINGS OR NON-DISCUSSION ITEMS. VICE CHAIR AZAR WILL READ THE PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA AND IDENTIFY THOSE THAT ARE CONSENT POSTPONEMENT AND NON-DISCUSSION COMMISSIONERS.
YOU'LL ALSO HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO REQUEST CONSENT ITEMS TO BE PULLED FOR DISCUSSION.
THESE ARE PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS FOR TONIGHT.
SO ITEM NUMBER TWO IS THE PLAN AMENDMENT MPA DASH 2023 DASH 0 4 0 4 4 3 0 2 KNUCKLES CROSSING DISTRICT TWO.
THIS ITEM IS UP FOR STAFF POSTPONEMENT TO MAY 27TH.
I NUMBER THREE IS A REZONING C 14 DASH 2025 DASH 0 0 2 8 SH.
THE BLUE MID LAMAR SQUARE, DISTRICT NINE.
THIS ITEM IS OFFERED FOR CONSENT.
I NUMBER FOUR IS A, UH, REZONING C 14 DASH 2 24 DASH 0 1 6 3 1700 SOUTH LAMAR DISTRICT NINE.
THIS ITEM IS UP FOR APPLICANT POSTPONEMENT TO MAY 13TH.
I NUMBER FIVE IS A REZONING C 14 DASH 2025 DASH 0 24 LINE DISTRICT FIVE.
THIS ITEM IS OFFERED FOR CONSENT I NUMBER SIX IS ALSO A REZONING C 14 DASH 2025 DASH 0 2 3 2 3 4 109 MARATHON DISTRICT 10.
THIS ITEM IS OFFERED FOR CONSENT.
ITEM NUMBER SEVEN, UM, IS A REZONING C EIGHT 14 DASH ZERO SIX DASH 0 1 0 9 0.03.
LAKE SHORE, PUT AMENDMENT, UH, NUMBER THREE, DISTRICT THREE.
THIS ITEM IS UP FOR A STAFF POSTPONEMENT TO APRIL 22ND.
ITEM NUMBER EIGHT IS AN LDC AMENDMENT C 20 DASH 2025 DASH 0 0 1 AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTER RESIDE CORRIDOR REGULATING
[00:15:01]
PLAN DISTRICT THREE.THIS ITEM IS UP FOR STAFF POSTPONEMENT TO APRIL 22ND.
ITEM NUMBER NINE IS THEIR RIGHT OF WAY VACATION 2020 DASH USER 2 5 89 LM 21 JULIANA COVE, DISTRICT THREE.
THIS ITEM IS OFFERED FOR CONSENT I NUMBER 10 IS ALSO RIGHT OF WAY OF VACATION, 2024 DASH 0 8 5 0 5 5 LM 11 6 3 2 ST.
THIS ITEM IS ALSO OFFERED FOR CONSENT CHAIR.
THAT'S ALL FOR OUR PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. AND I ALSO WANNA MENTION THAT ITEM NUMBER 12, WHICH IS A DISCUSSION ACTION ON PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CITY CODE TITLE 25, UM, RELATED TO THE PRESERVATION BONUS THAT IS ALSO UP FOR STAFF POSTPONEMENT TO APRIL 22ND.
VICE CHAIR, DO ANY COMMISSIONERS NEED TO RECUSE OR ABSTAIN FROM ITEMS ON THE AGENDA? OKAY.
UM, MS. GARCIA, DO WE HAVE ANY SPEAKERS SIGNED UP TO SPEAK ON ANY OF THE CONSENT ITEMS? YES.
STARTING ON ITEM FOUR, UM, OUR PRIMARY SPEAKER IN FAVOR IS MICHELLE HOUSEMAN.
MICHELLE, YOU WILL HAVE FIVE MINUTES.
I'M MICHELLE HOUSEMAN WITH LANDY SOLUTIONS REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT.
AND ITEM NUMBER FOUR, WE ARE ASKING FOR A POSTPONEMENT TO MAY 13TH AND IT IS OUR FIRST REQUEST, SO WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT YOU POSTPONE.
OUR NEXT SPEAKER, MOVING ON TO SPEAKERS IN OPPOSITION.
OUR FIRST SPEAKER IN OPPOSITION IS DREW ECKY.
DREW WILL BE JOINING US VIRTUALLY.
DREW, PLEASE PRESS SIX AND PROCEED WITH YOUR REMARKS.
LOOKS LIKE HE'S NOT IN OUR QUEUE AT THE MOMENT.
IF HE JOINS US, I'LL MAKE SURE TO COME BACK TO HIM.
OUR PRIMARY SPEAKER IN FAVOR IS RICKA KEEPERS.
RICKA, YOU'LL HAVE FIVE MINUTES.
GOOD, GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS.
I'M REALLY ONLY HERE IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS FOR ME.
I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE YOU WERE AWARE THAT WE WERE HERE, UM, TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS.
I DON'T THINK YOU WOULD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, BUT THANKS.
OUR NEXT SPEAKER IN FAVOR IS JED TAYLOR.
JED, YOU'LL HAVE THREE MINUTES.
I AM HERE REPRESENTING MY WIFE'S SALON.
UH, BEEN IN THE AUSTIN AREA FOR 20 YEARS, AND, UH, JUST WANNA TELL YOU A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE PLACE, UM, AS WE'RE TRYING TO GET THIS REZONING.
IT'S A SMALL BUILDING, 550 SQUARE FEET.
SHE DOES NOT ACCEPT ANY WALK-INS.
SHE HAS BEEN IN THE BUSINESS FOR 20 YEARS AND WELL RESPECTED.
UM, IT'S A SMALL PLACE ON SOUTH LAMAR, UH, RIGHT BEHIND THE NEW HATTIE BEES AND BEHIND MATTO RANCHO.
UM, I JUST WANNA BE HERE TO REPRESENT HER, SO THANK YOU.
OUR PRIMARY SPEAKER IN FAVOR IS MICHAEL WHALEN.
MICHAEL, YOU WILL HAVE FIVE MINUTES.
UH, IT'S A STRAIGHTFORWARD REQUEST.
WE'RE REQUESTING A SLIGHT CHANGE, UH, TO THE ZONING FOR THE PROPERTY OF 41 0 7 MARATHON BOULEVARD JUST OFF OF NORTH LAMAR.
UH, IT'S BEEN USED, UH, THE OWNER'S BEEN USING THE PROPERTY FOR UNOFFICIAL OFFSITE COVERED ACCESSORY PARKING FOR AN ADJACENT USE, AND THEY'VE BEEN WORKING JUST TO BRING IT INTO COMPLIANCE.
SO EVENTUALLY THE PROPERTY WILL BE IN A POSITION TO USE IT FOR SOMETHING OTHER THAN ACCESSORY PARKING, BUT THAT'S NOT TODAY.
TODAY WE JUST WANNA LOOK AT THIS INTERIM ACCESSORY USE AND WE'VE NARROWLY TAR TAILORED OUR REZONING REQUEST AND RECOGNITION OF THAT.
UH, IT'S CURRENTLY THE BASE ZONING'S LO, WE'RE REQUESTING LR AND WE'LL HAVE TO COME BACK THROUGH FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, UH, FOR THE ACCESSORY USE TO BE IN COMPLIANCE.
SO IT'S A MATTER OF TRYING TO GET THE PROPERTY IN COMPLIANCE.
MOVING FORWARD TO ITEMS SEVEN AND EIGHT, RICHARD SU IS THE PRIMARY SPEAKER IN FAVOR.
RICHARD, YOU WILL HAVE FIVE MINUTES.
I'M HERE ON BEHALF OF, AND I'M NOT SURE WHICH ONE IS AT THE LAKE SHORE OR THE VACATION.
[00:20:01]
UM, SIR, YOU'RE ASSIGNED UP FOR BOTH, UH, BOATS FOR LAKESHORE, BUT WE DON'T HAVE ANOTHER SPEAKER ON THAT ONE.AND THEN ON, UM, JULIANA COVE AS WELL.
WE HAVE YOU SIGNED UP, BUT THERE'S NO OTHER SPEAKERS AS WELL, THEN I'M IN FAVOR.
OUR PRIMARY SPEAKER IN FAVOR IS STEVEN JAMESON.
STEVEN WILL BE JOINING US VIRTUALLY.
STEVEN, PLEASE PRESS STAR SIX AND PROCEED WITH YOUR REMARKS.
HI, THIS IS STEVE JAMESON WITH JAMESON CIVIL ENGINEERING.
I'M JUST HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS IF, IF ANYBODY HAS ANYTHING ON THE ENGINEER OF RECORD, IT'S, IT'S A RIGHT OF WAY VACATION.
OUR NEXT SPEAKER IN FAVOR IS KATHERINE LO LOZA.
KATHERINE WILL BE JOINING US VIRTUALLY.
CATHERINE, PLEASE PRESS STAR SIX AND PROCEED WITH YOUR REMARKS.
YOU'LL HAVE THREE MINUTES, LOOKS LIKE CATHERINE'S NOT IN OUR QUEUE.
AGAIN, IF SHE JOINS, WE'LL BE SURE TO COME BACK TO HER.
AND MOVING FORWARD TO ITEM 12.
OUR FIRST SPEAKER IN OPPOSITION IS BETSY GREENBERG.
BETSY, YOU'LL HAVE THREE MINUTES.
THANK YOU MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
MY NAME IS BETSY GREENBERG AND I LIVE NEAR UNO.
I ASKED STAFF FOR THE DRAFT CODE FOR THE UPDATED UNO AND THIS MORNING WAS TOLD QUOTE, WE DON'T HAVE A DRAFT ORDINANCE YET.
IT SHOULD BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO OUR PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 22ND.
SO IT SHOULD BE AVAILABLE IN ABOUT TWO WEEKS.
WITHOUT THE DRAFT CODE, IT'S IMPOSSIBLE TO KNOW EXACTLY WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED.
UM, THIS REALLY IS NOT GOOD FOR THE COMMISSION TO BE ABLE TO, UM, EVALUATE IT.
AND IT'S CERTAINLY NOT GOOD FOR THE PUBLIC.
SO I HOPE YOU'LL LET THE STAFF KNOW THAT NOT HAVING IT READY UNTIL THE DAY OR DAY, FEW DAYS BEFORE THE HEARING IS REALLY NOT ACCEPTABLE SINCE THE BELL DIDN'T RING.
UM, I HAVE TWO OTHER COMMENTS, BOTH BASED ON THE INFORMATION AND THE COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF DENSITY BONUS PROGRAMS. REMEMBER THE NUMBER THREE, I'LL SEND YOU THE LINK THOUGH.
FIGURE THREE AND TABLE THREE, FIGURE THREE IN THAT STUDY SHOWS THAT AS BUILDING HEIGHT INCREASES, THE CONSTRUCTION COST PER SQUARE FOOT ALSO INCREASE, AND THAT INCREASES EXPONENTIAL, NOT LINEAR.
THIS MEANS THAT PROJECTS USING THE PROPOSED HEIGHTS FOR UNO WILL PRODUCE EXPENSIVE LUXURY HOUSING INSTEAD OF HOUSING APPROPRIATE FOR STUDENTS.
TABLE THREE DESCRIBES THE UNO INCOME RESTRICTED RENT STANDARDS, WHICH ALLOW RENTAL BY THE BEDROOM.
THE STUDY POINTS OUT THAT AS A RESULT, AFFORDABLE RENTS FOR MULTI BEDROOM UNITS FAR EXCEED THE INCOME RESTRICTED RENTS ALLOWED IN-BED UNITS IN ANY OTHER DENSITY BONUS PROGRAM IN THE CITY.
THIS IS UNFAIR TO THE STUDENTS WHO NEED AFFORDABLE HOUSING.
SO I HOPE THAT IF YOU'RE THINKING ABOUT AMENDMENTS TO THE PROPOSAL, UM, YOU'LL LOOK AT THOSE TWO ISSUES.
TABLE THREE AND FIGURE THREE AND A DRAFT CODE THAT'S AVAILABLE WELL BEFORE YOUR HEARING.
IT LOOKS LIKE DREW Z DECKY SPEAKING ON ITEM FOUR.
AND CATHERINE LOZA SPEAKING FOR ITEM 10 ARE BOTH NOT IN OUR QUEUE.
SO CHAIR, THAT CONCLUDES THE SPEAKERS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.
DO WE HAVE ANY COMMISSIONERS THAT WANT TO PULL ANY OF THE CONSENT ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION OR OTHERWISE HAVE QUESTIONS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA? OKAY.
IS THERE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AND THE MINUTES FROM THE LAST TWO MEETINGS? I SEE COMMISSIONER MAXWELL SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HANEY.
UNLESS THERE IS OBJECTION, THAT MOTION PASSES.
SO THIS CONCLUDES THE CONSENT AGENDA.
ALRIGHT, WE DON'T HAVE ANY ZONING CASES TO HEAR THIS EVENING, SO WE'RE GOING TO
[11. Staff briefing on proposed amendments to City Code Title 25 (Land Development) to repeal regulations related to the University Neighborhood Overlay (UNO) and establish a new Density Bonus University Neighborhood Overlay (DBUNO) combining district. Presentation by Alan Pani, 512-974-8084, alan.pani@austintexas.gov, Planning Department.]
JUMP TO OUR STAFF BRIEFING ITEM NUMBER 11.[00:25:02]
AND, UM, STAFF IS REQUESTING 20 MINUTES ALLOCATED FOR PRESENTATION.TYPICALLY FOR OUR BRIEFINGS WE ALLOCATE 15.
UM, UNLESS THERE IS OBJECTION TO THAT, UM, WE WILL ALLOW STAFF 20 MINUTES.
ALL RIGHT, FOR OUR NEW COMMISSIONERS, UM, WE'LL HEAR STAFF'S PRESENTATION AND THEN WE HAVE SEVERAL SPEAKERS SIGNED UP FOR AND, AND AGAINST THIS ITEM, THIS IS A BRIEFING.
UM, SO WE'LL GET A ROUND OF QUESTION AND ANSWER.
UM, IF YOU'RE ONE OF THE EIGHT SPOTS, YOU GET FIVE MINUTES.
UM, AND WE CAN ALWAYS VOTE TO EXTEND IF WE HAVE A LOT OF QUESTIONS, UM, THAT WANT TO BE ASKED.
BUT WE ARE NOT ACTING ON THIS ITEM TONIGHT.
THIS WILL BE HEARD ON THE 22ND.
ALRIGHT, MR. YEAH, SO THIS IS REALLY JUST A, A PREVIEW OF AN ITEM THAT'S GONNA BE COMING BACK.
I'M REPRESENTING THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT TONIGHT.
UM, AND I'M GONNA BE GIVING AN OVERVIEW OF THE PROPOSED UPDATES TO THE UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOOD OVERLAY OR UNO, UM, AND THE KIND OF ONGOING PUBLIC REVIEW PROCESS.
TODAY'S PRESENTATION WILL COVER THE FOLLOWING TOP TOPICS, BACKGROUND ON UNO, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION THAT INITIATED THE UPDATES, THE PROPOSED CHANGES, THE PROCESS FOR IMPLEMENTATION, AND THE NEXT STEPS MOVING FORWARD.
SO YEAH, AND NEXT SLIDE AGAIN.
UM, UNO WAS ESTABLISHED IN 2004 AND UPDATED IN 2014.
AND AGAIN IN 2019 THE PROGRAM AIMED TO PROMOTE HIGH DENSITY PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY DEVELOPMENT IN THE WEST CAMPUS AREA.
DUE IN PART TO THE SUCCESS OF THE PROGRAM, THE POPULATION IN WEST CAMPUS HAS GROWN TO OVER 28,000 RESIDENTS.
ON THE RIGHT HAND SIDE, YOU CAN SEE THE EXISTING UNO APPLICABILITY AREA AND THE SUBDISTRICTS.
IN APRIL, 2024, CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED A RESOLUTION DIRECTING STAFF TO EXPLORE UPDATES TO UNO.
THIS RES RESOLUTION INITIATED CHANGES TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE MEANT TO BE IMPLEMENTED BY THIS SPRING.
THE RESOLUTION'S GOALS ARE TO PROVIDE QUALITY, SAFE AND AFFORDABLE LIVING, ESPECIALLY FOR STUDENTS.
THIS IS ACCOMPLISHED BY INCREASING HOUSING CAPACITY AND AFFORDABILITY, ENSURING ACCESS TO DAILY NEEDS AND SERVICES IN WEST CAMPUS, AND SUPPORTING LIGHT RAIL AND MOBILITY ENHANCEMENTS.
SOME KEY DIRECTION PROVIDED BY CITY COUNCIL TO BE CONSIDERED INCLUDED.
REMOVING HEIGHT LIMITS FOR THE INNER WEST ADOBE SUBDISTRICTS, ALIGNING HEIGHT LIMITS WITH THE ETOD OVERLAY, EXPANDING UNO BOUNDARIES AND ALLOWING MORE PROPERTIES TO PARTICIPATE, MODIFYING SUBDISTRICT BOUNDARIES, ENSURING AN APPROPRIATE STEP DOWN IN HEIGHTS AND EXPANSION AREAS AND DISCOURAGING ABOVE GROUND PARKING IN FAVOR OF UNDERGROUND PARKING.
ALRIGHT, AND MOST OF Y'ALL ALREADY KNOW THIS, BUT FOR SOME OF Y'ALL THAT ARE NEW TO THE COMMISSION, UPDATING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FALLS A THREE STEP PROCESS INITIATION, DEVELOPMENT, ENGAGEMENT, AND REVIEW AND ADOPTION.
SO WE'RE CURRENTLY IN THE REVIEW AND ADOPTION PHASE AND WE'VE MET WITH THE CODE JOINT COMMITTEE AND ARE PLANNING TO MEET WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION, UM, FOR ACTION.
TO IMPLEMENT THE REQUESTED CHANGES, STAFF PROPOSES TO CREATE A NEW ZONING DISTRICT THAT CONSOLIDATES THE EXISTING UNO REGULATIONS AND INCLUDES THE REQUESTED UPDATES.
AS YOU GUYS KNOW, THE REZONING PROCESS REQUIRES PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND PLANNING, COMMISSION REVIEW AND CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL.
ADDITIONALLY, UNO IS PART OF THE CENTRAL AUSTIN COMBINED NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN AND AMENDMENTS TO THE FUTURE.
LAND USE MAP OR, OR FLUM WILL BE NEEDED TO ALIGN WITH THE UPDATED DEVELOPMENT ENTITLEMENTS.
AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE SLIDE, UM, THE EXISTING AREA IS DESIGNATED AS HIGH DENSITY MIXED USE IN THE DARKER BROWN OR MIXED USE IN THE LIGHTER BROWN.
STAFF PROPOSED TO UPDATE THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR THE UNO DISTRICT TO HIGH DENSITY MIXED USE.
THIS IS APPROPRIATE FOR AREAS THAT, UM, ALLOW FOR THREE TO ONE FAR OR GREATER.
AND THIS REQUIRES SIMILAR NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING REQUIREMENTS TO THE REZONING PROCESS.
OKAY, AND WE'RE GONNA GET INTO THE PROPOSED CHANGES.
THIS SLIDE PROVIDES AN OVERVIEW OF THE DRAFT PROPOSED CHANGES AND TO THE EXTENT TO WHICH THEY HAVE BEEN MODIFIED FROM THE EXISTING REGULATIONS.
SOME ELEMENTS REMAIN UNCHANGED WHILE OTHERS ARE NEW REQUIREMENTS ALTOGETHER.
AND WE'RE GONNA GO INTO EACH ONE IN MORE DETAIL IN THE COMING SLIDES.
THE DRAFT PROPOSAL IS STRUCTURED INTO GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
[00:30:01]
THAT APPLY TO ALL DEVELOPMENTS THAT CHOOSE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PROGRAM, SUCH AS ALLOWED USES AND GENERAL SITE DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN STANDARDS, AND THEN SUB-DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE PARTICULAR TO EACH SUB-DISTRICT, SUCH AS HEIGHT ALLOWANCES, AFFORDABILITY REQUIREMENTS, AND COMMUNITY BENEFIT REQUIREMENTS.I'M GONNA START BY LOOKING AT THE GENERAL REQUIREMENTS NEXT SLIDE.
BASED ON CITY COUNCIL DIRECTION AND ANALYSIS OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES, THE APPLICABILITY OF THE UNO PROGRAM IS PROPOSED TO BE EXPANDED TO INCLUDE COMMERCIAL AND MULTIFAMILY PROPERTIES ADJACENT TO THE CURRENT BOUNDARIES, THE PROPOSED BOUNDARIES ALIGN WITH THE DOWNTOWN CENTER ADOPTED IN THE IMAGINE AUSTIN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
SO THIS MAP ON THE SLIDE IN BLUE SHOWS THE PROPOSED BOUNDARIES AND THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES SHOWN WITH THE YELLOW OUTLINE.
UNO WILL REMAIN A VOLUNTARY PROGRAM WITH DEVELOPMENTS WHO OPT IN SUBJECT TO THE PROGRAM'S REGULATIONS.
SOME BASIC COMPONENTS OF THE PROGRAM REMAIN UNCHANGED.
THIS INCLUDES SITE DEVELOPMENT EXEMPTIONS SUCH AS MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO AND MINIMUM SITE AREA REQUIREMENTS.
ADDITIONALLY, REGULATIONS RELATED TO STREET WALL AND OCCUPANT SPACE REMAIN UNCHANGED.
THE PROPOSAL ALSO UPDATES OR MODIFIES SOME UNO SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR STREET SCAPES.
THE MINIMUM DIMENSIONS WILL NOW REFER TO THE PEDESTRIAN ZONE DIMENSIONS OF THE TRANSPORTATION CRITERIA MANUAL.
BUT THE STREET FURNISHING REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDING STREET TREES, BENCHES, TRASH SKEPTICALS, AND BIKE RACKS WILL REMAIN SETBACK.
STANDARDS ARE UPDATED TO ENSURE ADEQUATE FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS.
THE PROPOSAL ALSO MODIFIES THE USES THAT ARE ALLOWED TO BE INCORPORATED INTO OUR PARTICIPATING DEVELOPMENT.
TO PROHIBIT OR MAKE CONDITIONAL NON-TRANS SUPPORTIVE USES AND UPDATE THE LIST OF LOCAL USES FOR BUILDING DESIGN, THE UNO GUIDELINES WILL CONTINUE TO BE REQUIRED AND THE GREEN BUILDING REQUIREMENT IS INCREASED FROM ONE STAR TO TWO STARS.
LASTLY, THE PROPOSAL ENHANCES SCREENING REQUIREMENTS FOR TRASH OR SKEPTICALS AND ABOVE GROUND PARKING.
THE PROPOSAL INCLUDES A MAXIMUM PARKING PROVISION MODELED ON THE RECENT CHANGES TO DOWNTOWN.
THIS NEW PARKING MAXIMUM SETS A LIMIT AT 40% OF THE FORMER MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENTS WITH AN ALLOWANCE UP TO 60% IF AT LEAST HALF THE PARKING IS PROVIDED.
UNDERGROUND BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS HAVE ALSO BEEN UPDATED TO ENSURE NEW DEVELOPMENTS HAVE ADEQUATE BIKE FACILITIES.
THE PROPOSAL INCLUDES REFERENCES TO NEW LEASE AND REDEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS.
NEW PROVISIONS INCLUDE DISPERSION OF AFFORDABLE UNITS, EQUAL ACCESS TO AMENITIES, AND APPLYING TENANT PROTECTIONS AND REDEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR EXISTING MULTIFAMILY AND CERTAIN COMMERCIAL U USES.
STAFF IS ALSO RECOMMENDING RESTRICTIONS ON EARLY LEASING AND ACCOMMODATIONS FOR DELAYED OCCUPANCY.
THESE PROVISIONS WOULD BE ADDED THROUGH AN AMENDMENT PROCESS TO FOUR 18, ARTICLE TWO, WHICH LAYS OUT REQUIREMENTS FOR DENSITY BONUS PROGRAMS. IN ADDITION TO THE LEASE, THE NEW LEASE PROVISIONS FOUR 18 WILL BE AMENDED TO INCLUDE A PROHIBITION ON A WINDOWLESS BEDROOM FOR DEVELOPMENTS THROUGH THE UNO PROGRAM.
AND WE'RE NOW GONNA TAKE A LOOK AT THE SUBDISTRICT REGULATIONS.
THIS MAP SHOWS THE CURRENT UNO SUBDISTRICTS WITH THE INNER WEST SUBDISTRICT SHOWN IN RED AS THE HIGHEST DENSITY DISTRICT WITH THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 300 FEET.
THE OUTER WEST SUBDISTRICT HAS VARIOUS HEIGHT LIMITS TAPERING DOWN TOWARDS THE PERIMETER OF THE UNO AREA.
THE CITY COUNCIL REQUESTED MODIFICATION TO THESE SUBDISTRICT BOUNDARIES, IN PARTICULAR EXPANSION OF THE INNER WEST SUBDISTRICT AND MODIFICATION TO ALLOWED BUILDING, BUILDING HEIGHTS.
THIS MAP SHOWS PROPOSED SUBDISTRICTS WITH OUTER WEST SHOWN IN BLUE, INNER WEST AND RED.
AND A NEW TRANSIT CORE SUBDISTRICT SHOWN IN YELLOW SUBDISTRICTS WERE MODIFIED AS DIRECTED BY CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION TO ACCOMMODATE THE HOUSING CAPACITY NECESSARY TO REACH THE POPULATION TARGETS FOR THE DISTRICT AND TO ALLOW HEIGHT LEVELS OF DENSITY OR THE, EXCUSE ME, THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF DENSITY CLOSEST TO THE UNIVERSITY AND WEST MALL LIGHT RAIL STATION.
AND WE'RE NOW GONNA TAKE A CLOSER LOOK AT EACH SUBDISTRICT.
THE TRANSIT CORE SUBDISTRICT PROMOTES HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, LOCATES GREATEST DENSITY NEAR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS CAMPUS AND THE PLANNED LIGHT RAIL ALONG GUADALUPE, IT INCORPORATES PARTS OF THE PREVIOUS ADOBE GUADALUPE AND INNER WEST SUBDISTRICTS.
THE INNER WEST SIMILARLY PROMOTE PROMOTES HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
IT'S THE NEXT CLOSEST SUBDISTRICT TO THE CAMPUS AREA.
IT EXPANDS INNER WEST AND INCREASES ALLOWED
[00:35:01]
BUILDING HEIGHTS FALLS GENERALLY WITHIN THE CAMPUS SHUTTLE ROUTES.THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES, AGAIN, ARE SHOWN IN YELLOW WITH THE, WITH THE, UH, RED, THE AS THE PROPOSED AREA.
THIS CHART SHOWS THE SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE TRANSIT CORE AND INNER WEST SUBDISTRICTS BUILDING HEIGHTS CAN REACH 600 FEET IN THE TRANSIT CORE SUBDISTRICT AND 420 FEET IN THE INNER WEST SUBDISTRICT.
THIS IS AN INCREASE FROM THE 300 FOOT MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF THE EXISTING INNER WEST SUBDISTRICT TO DISCOURAGE ABOVE GROUND PARKING.
A MAXIMUM OF THREE FLOORS IS PROPOSED.
ADDITIONAL PARKING WOULD NEED TO BE LOCATED BELOW, BELOW GROUND ONE COMMUNITY BENEFIT GATEKEEPER OPTION WILL BE REQUIRED AND DEVELOPMENTS MUST ADHERE TO NEW TOWER SPACING STANDARDS.
AND BOTH OF THOSE I'M GONNA COVER IN THE NEXT COUPLE SLIDES.
DEVELOPMENTS IN THE TRANSIT CORE AND INNER WEST SUBDISTRICTS MUST INCLUDE AT LEAST ONE OF THE GATEKEEPER COMMUNITY BENEFIT REQUIREMENTS.
THE MENU OF OPTIONS WILL ENCOURAGE CREATIVE AND ORIGINAL DESIGN THAT ACCOMMODATES DIFFERENT SITE CONDITIONS.
TOGETHER, THESE OPTIONS WILL CREATE A COM COMPLETE COMMUNITY WITH INCENTIVES FOR DEVELOPMENT TO PROVIDE FOR DAILY NEEDS SUCH AS GROCERY STORES AND RETAIL SPACES, ALONG WITH INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS SUCH AS ONSITE WATER REUSE SYSTEMS AND GREEN ROOF ELEMENTS TO MITIGATE DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS.
AND, AND NOT SHOWN ON THIS SLIDE, BUT WITHIN THE UPDATED PROPOSAL IS AN EXEMPTION FROM THE COMMUNITY BENEFIT REQUIREMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENTS WHICH PROVIDE A MAJORITY OF THEIR UNITS OR BEDROOMS AS AFFORDABLE.
MANY RECENT DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN UNO ARE BUILT NEARLY LOT LINE TO LOT LINE LIVING, LITTLE SPACE BETWEEN BUILDING BUILDINGS AS SHOWN IN THIS EXAMPLE, STAFF RESEARCH REGULATIONS FOR TALL BUILDINGS ACROSS NORTH AMERICAN CITIES AND MILD IMPACTS OF VARIOUS OPTIONS.
AS PROPOSED AT A HEIGHT OF 120 FEET, BUILDINGS WILL BE REQUIRED TO STEP BACK 20 FEET FROM A PARCEL WITH A MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT GREATER THAN 120 FEET OR 40 FEET FROM AN EXISTING BUILDING OF 120 FEET IN HEIGHT OR GREATER.
ALTERNATIVELY, IF THE LOT WIDTH IS UNDER A HUNDRED FEET, THEN THE MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE PROPORTIONS OF A BUILDING ABOVE 120 FEET IS 65%.
ESSENTIALLY ALLOWING SMALL, SMALLER LOTS TO USE THAT 65% BUILDING COVERAGE.
THE OUTER WEST SUBDISTRICT FOLLOWS A MID-RISE DEVELOPMENT PATTERN.
IT IS LOCATED A 15 TO 20 MINUTE WALK TO CAMPUS WITH ACCESS TO TRANSIT OPTIONS.
IT PROVIDES A BALANCE BETWEEN THE DENSER SUBDISTRICTS CLOSER TO THE UNIVERSITY AND THE LOWER DENSITY NEIGHBORHOODS TO THE WEST.
HEIGHT ALLOWANCES WILL BE STANDARDIZED ACROSS THE DISTRICT WITH A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 90 FEET.
A MAXIMUM OF TWO STORIES OF ABOUND ABOVE GROUND PARKING IS PROPO PROMO PROPOSED AND THE COMMUNITY BENEFIT REQUIRES ARE NOT PROPOSED TO APPLY TO THIS SUBDISTRICT.
PROPERTIES WITHIN 75 FEET OF THE PROGRAM BOUNDARY MAY BE IMPACTED BY COMPATIBILITY DUE TO THEIR PROXIMITY TO SINGLE FAMILY USES BEYOND THE PROGRAM BOUNDARIES.
AND THERE'S NO TRIGGERING PROPERTIES CURRENTLY WITHIN THE UNO DISTRICT.
SO NOW WE'LL DISCUSS THE AFFORDABILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR PARTICIPATING IN THE DENSITY BONUS PROGRAM.
STARTING WITH THE RENTAL LIMITS, THE EXISTING UNO PROGRAM ALLOWS FOR PROPERTIES TO MEET AFFORDABILITY REQUIREMENTS BY PROVIDING A PERCENTAGE OF BEDROOMS OR A PERCENTAGE OF UNITS AS AFFORDABLE.
YOU'LL CONTINUE TO SEE THIS OPTION FOR EITHER RENTAL BY THE BEDROOM OR BY THE UNIT IN THE PROPOSAL.
THE EXISTING PROGRAM REQUIRES PARTICIPATING DEVELOPMENTS TO PROVIDE UNITS AT THE 60% MFI LEVEL FOR THE FIRST TIER, AND A COMBINATION OF THE 60% AND 50% MFI LEVELS FOR THE SECOND TIER TO ALLOW FOR MORE ELIGIBLE STUDENTS TO BE ABLE TO AFFORD TO LIVE WITHIN THE DISTRICT.
STAFF IS PROPOSING TO ACQUIRE ALL AFFORDABLE UNITS AT THE DEEPER 50%.
MFI LEVEL STAFF IS ALSO PROPOSING TO HAVE RENTAL LIMITS ESCALATE BASED ON THE NUMBER OF BEDROOMS FOR PROPERTIES THAT ARE RENTED BY THE UNIT.
YOU CAN SEE THE CURRENT RENTAL LIMITS ON THIS TABLE.
AS A REMINDER, THESE LIMITS ARE UPDATED ANNUALLY BY THE HOUSING DEPARTMENT.
THE PROPOSAL CONTINUES TO INCORPORATE A TIERED AFFORDABILITY REQUIRE REQUIREMENT SYSTEM THAT ALLOWS PROPERTY OWNERS TO CHOOSE A HEIGHT BONUS THAT BEST FIT THEIR DEVELOPMENT WHILE MAXIMIZING OVERALL AFFORDABLE HOUSING PRODUCTION.
AFFORDABILITY SET ASIDES AND ASSOCIATED HEIGHT BONUSES ARE ASSIGNED BASED ON THE SUBDISTRICT IN BOTH THE TRANSIT CORE AND INNER WEST SUBDISTRICT PROVIDING 20% OF BEDROOMS OR 10% OF UNITS
[00:40:01]
AS AFFORDABLE, WILL OFFER A 240 FOOT HEIGHT BONUS TO A MAXIMUM OF 300 FEET IN MOST INSTANCES.A SECOND TIER IS OFFERED IN THE TRANSIT CORE AND INNER WEST SUBDISTRICT, WHICH ALLOWS DEVELOPMENTS TO REACH A MAXIMUM, THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF THE SUBDISTRICT BY PROVIDING ADDITIONAL 10% OF BEDROOMS OR 5% OF UNITS WITHIN THAT SECOND BONUS AREA.
AS AFFORDABLE, A FEE IN LIEU OF ONSITE BEDROOMS IS AVAILABLE FOR THE SECOND TIER OF THE BONUS PROGRAM.
FOR THE OUTER WEST SUBDISTRICT, 20% OF BEDROOMS OR 10% OF UNITS MUST BE PROVIDED AS AFFORDABLE.
SO THIS SLIDE WRAPS UP AND SUMMARIZES THE SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ACROSS THE THREE SUBDISTRICTS.
THESE CHANGES ARE EXPECTED TO RESULT IN HIGH RISE DEVELOPMENT IN THE TRANSIT CORE AND INNER WEST SUBDISTRICTS.
TYPICAL OF RAINY STREET AND UNO SINCE THE HYDE AMENDMENTS IN 2019 AND CONTINUED MIDRISE DEVELOPMENT IN THE OUTER WEST SUBDISTRICT.
SO TO ENSURE BROAD COMMUNITY INPUT, WE'VE ENGAGED WITH KEY STAKEHOLDERS IN INCLUDING COMMUNITY GROUPS, NEIGHBORHOOD GROUPS, UT FACULTY, STUDENT GROUPS, AND TENANT ADVOCATES.
TWO PUBLIC SURVEYS WERE DISTRIBUTED TO OVER 6,000 INDIVIDUALS OR GROUPS, EACH YIELDING OVER 300 RESPONSES.
THIS ENGAGEMENT OFFERED VA VALUABLE INSIGHTS INTO COMMUNITY PRIORITIES AND CONCERNS REGARDING DEVELOPMENT IN THE UNO AREA.
A PREFERENCE FOR DIVERSE BUILDING TYPES, CAREFUL ATTENTION TO TRANSITIONS AND STRONG SUPPORT FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING CAME TO THE FOREFRONT OF RESPONSES.
THESE FINDINGS HELP GUIDE THE DRAFT PROPOSAL THAT WE'VE DISCUSSED TODAY.
AND AS I'VE MENTIONED A COUPLE TIMES, WE'LL BE AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING ON APRIL 22ND AND AT CITY COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION ON MAY 8TH.
THERE'S THE TIMELINE AND I THINK NOW WE'RE READY FOR QUESTIONS.
I THINK FIRST WE'LL HEAR FROM OUR SPEAKERS.
OUR PRIMARY SPEAKER IN FAVOR IS EDWIN BATISTA.
EDWIN WILL BE JOINING US VIRTUALLY.
EDWIN, PLEASE PRESS STAR SIX AND PROCEED WITH YOUR REMARKS.
UH, GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS.
I AM A RESIDENT OF DISTRICT SEVEN.
I MOVED TO AUSTIN IN 2016 AND LIVED IN THE WEST CAMPUS NEIGHBORHOOD FOR THREE YEARS, FROM 2016 TO 2019.
AND AS YOU CAN IMAGINE, THOSE THREE YEARS WERE PIVOTAL TO MY, UH, EXPERIENCE HERE IN THE CITY IN VARIOUS WAYS AND IN, AND IT'S CLOSELY TIED TO HOUSING.
UH, SO MUCH SO THAT, UM, AND THIS IS AS AN UNDERGRADUATE, BUT SO MUCH SO THAT WHEN I WAS, UH, STILL STUDYING FOR GRAD SCHOOL HERE, THAT I FOCUSED MY, MY MASTER'S REPORT ON THIS TOPIC OF STUDENTIFICATION HERE IN THE CITY.
AND, UM, I HAVE A LOT OF THOUGHTS ON, ON, UH, THIS PROPOSAL AND I'M REALLY EXCITED TO SEE IT MOVE FORWARD AND, UH, OF WHAT WOULD LIKE TO THINK STAFF AND, UH, THE COMMUNITY MEMBERS THAT HAVE PUT A LOT OF TIME AND EFFORT INTO THIS.
AND THERE'S A LOT OF GREAT STUFF HERE.
UM, IF I DO WANT TO RAISE SOME CONCERN AROUND CERTAIN ISSUES THAT I HOPE WILL BE TAKEN, UH, UH, FOR CONSIDERATION AND HOPEFULLY, UM, UH, AMENDED FIRST, THE FIRST THING BEING THE, UH, EXCLUSION OF THE GUADALUPE SUBDISTRICT FROM THE TRANSIT CORE, UH, SUBDISTRICT, I REALLY DO BELIEVE THAT, UH, THIS EXCLUSION WILL BENEFIT THE PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE OF, OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD IN REGARDS TO NOT ALLOWING 60 FOOT STORY BUILDINGS.
NEXT ALONG THE JAVAN, THOUGH IT MAY MAKE LOGICAL SENSE, UM, THESE ARE VERY SMALL, LOTS, VERY, VERY SMALL PARCELS THERE.
THERE'S, UNLESS THERE IS, UH, A MERGING OF THOSE, UH, PARCELS, IT'S GONNA BE DIFFICULT TO BUILD BIG BUILDINGS ALONG THE DRAG.
SO I THINK IT'S GREAT TO HAVE, UH, TO FOLLOW THE PRECEDENT THAT HAS BEEN SET BY THE NEW BUILDING, UH, UNION ON SAN ANTONIO, BUT ALSO THE CASTILIAN ON SAN, UH, SAN ANTONIO AS HEIGHT LIMITS AND, AND THEN THE SETBACK FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT.
BUT, UM, OTHER THAN THAT, I REALLY WANTED TO DISCOURAGE ANY AND ALL PARKING GOING FORWARD AS WELL.
I DON'T KNOW WHY WE'RE TALKING ABOUT PARKING WHEN WE'RE TRYING TO FOCUS ON TRANSIT AND WALKABILITY.
[00:45:01]
ALSO I WANT TO JUST EMPHASIZE THAT SOME OF THE, THE DISTRICT BOUNDARIES SHOULD BE RECONSIDERED FOR THE TRANSIT CORRIDOR.I THINK EVERYTHING SOUTH OF 28TH STREET, EAST OF RIO GRANDE STREET, NORTH OF MLK SHOULD BE THE TRANSIT CORRIDOR FOR THE INNER WEST CAMPUS DISTRICT.
EVERYTHING SOUTH OF RIO, EVERYTHING SOUTH OF 28TH STREET, WEST OF 20 OF RIO GRANDE WEST TO SAN PEDRO AND EAST OF SAN GABRIEL, NORTH OF MLK SHOULD BE THE INNER WEST CAMPUS SUBDISTRICT.
AND THEN SIMPLY EVERYTHING WEST OF SAN GABRIEL AND NORTH OF 28TH STREET, PLUS THE HEMP HILL PARK SHOULD BE THE OUTER WEST CAMPUS SUBDISTRICT.
OTHER THAN THAT, I THINK WISHLIST ITEMS WOULD BE TO EXPAND THE 40 YEAR REQUIREMENT FOR SMART HOUSING FOR THESE NEW DEVELOPMENTS AS THEY ARE GOING TO BE MORE, UM, UH, BUILT WITH STRONGER AND, AND BETTER CONSTRUCTION, UH, TECHNIQUES.
SO THEY SHOULD THEORETICALLY LAST LONGER AND WOULD ADVOCATE FOR THAT TO BE EXTENDED, UH, AND ALSO JUST IMPROVE THE LIST OF COMMUNITY BENEFIT OPTIONS.
I THINK RIGHT NOW THEY'RE VERY NARROW.
SHOULD WE FOC WE SHOULD FOCUS MORE ON MICRO MOBILITY.
IT'S GREAT THAT THERE'S A PEDESTRIAN ZONE.
IT'S GOING TO BE REQUIRED FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT, BUT WE STILL HAVE ONLY ONE PROTECTED BIKE LANE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
WE NEED TO HAVE BUILT INFRASTRUCTURE THAT SUPPORTS WALKING, BIKING.
AND RIGHT NOW, THERE IS NOT THAT GOING ON RIGHT NOW, AND I THINK THIS WOULD BE A GREAT OPPORTUNITY TO REALLY INCORPORATE MOBILITY.
UM, AGAIN, I WOULD REALLY APPRECIATE, UH, SOME CONTINU CONSIDERATION FOR SOME OF THESE, UH, AMENDMENTS AND HOPE THAT, UH, THERE ARE SOME APPROVAL DISCUSSIONS FOR FOR THIS.
AND I, I REALLY, AGAIN, WANNA THANK THE STAFF AND KEN, YOUR, UH, THE COMMISSIONERS FOR YOUR TIME ON, ON THIS, UH, EFFORT.
OUR NEXT SPEAKER IN FAVOR IS PHILLIP WILEY.
PHILLIP, YOU'LL HAVE THREE MINUTES.
THE, I REALLY PUT THIS CHART UP BECAUSE I WANTED TO TALK ABOUT UNO, BUT I COULDN'T EARLIER.
THIS CHART SHOWS YOU THAT THE LEADERS OF THE LEGISLATURE, THE LEADERS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HAVE DECIDED THAT THE BENEFITS OF STUDENTS BEING CLOSE TO CAMPUS ARE SO GREAT THAT THEY'RE HAVING PEOPLE CROSS I 35 TO GET THERE.
NOW, SOMEDAY THERE MAY BE A CAP AND STITCH AND THE WALK IS MUCH BETTER.
AND THIS WALK SHED IMP ASSUMES IT'S GONNA GET MUCH BETTER.
AND IN PLANNING, YOU HAVE TO MAKE ASSUMPTIONS.
SO I THINK THAT'S A REASONABLE ASSUMPTION.
THINGS WILL GET BETTER FOR THOSE POOR PEOPLE THAT ARE HAVING TO WALK ACROSS I 35.
WHEN THEY DO, THEY ARE STILL ONLY GONNA BE ABLE TO WALK IN 15 MINUTES TO A SUBSET OF CAMPUS.
SO IF YOU LOOK AT WHAT OTHER PEOPLE THINK IS A REASONABLE WALK, IT'S AT LEAST 15 MINUTES.
THIS IS THE WALK FROM ROBIN'S PLACE.
ROBIN'S PLACE IS EXCLUDED FROM THE CURRENT VERSION OF UNO.
THIS IS A 15 MINUTE WALK FROM ROBIN'S PLACE.
YOU CAN SEE THAT YOU CAN GET TO MOST OF THE CLASSROOMS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS IF YOU EXTEND UNO TO ROBIN'S PLACE AND PUT AN APPROPRIATE LEVEL OF DENSITY THERE.
SO AS FAR AS THE WORDS THAT GO WITH THIS, THE FIRST WAS THAT, UM, WE'VE KNOWN SINCE 2012 THAT THEY WANTED TO PUT THE STUDENTS OVER EAST OF I 35.
THEY'VE DONE THAT, THEY BOUGHT THE LAND, THEY'VE ANNOUNCED PLANS FOR TWO SEPARATE PROGRAMS. UM, THE, THE, AND JUST TO GIVE YOU THE ADDRESSES OF THESE DATA POINTS THAT I USED TO, TO, TO DRAW THE CIRCLES, THE, THE, THE ONE WAS, UH, ON LEONE WAS 2006 ON ROBIN'S PLACES 1906.
COULD YOU MOVE TO THE, TO THE NEXT CHART PLEASE? THIS IS 1906, UH, ROBIN'S PLACE NEXT TO IT IS 1904.
THIS IS THE WEST SIDE OF THE STREET.
THE FIRST THING I'D LIKE TO DO IS GET THE EAST SIDE OF THE STREET.
UNO EXTENDED TO THE EAST SIDE OF THE STREET, THE WEST SIDE OF THE STREET.
THE, THESE ARE APARTMENT BUILDINGS THAT HAVE BEEN THERE FOR DECADES.
UM, WHAT'S REALLY HAPPENED HERE I THINK IS THAT WE HAVE, THE BIG THING FOR THIS WHOLE EXERCISE THAT I REALLY WANNA IMPRESS WITH YOU IS THIS IS OUR CHANCE TO REEVALUATE HAVING COMPATIBILITY BUILT INTO THE MAP.
[00:50:01]
AND SAID, IT'S NO LONGER 540 FEET, IT'S NOW 75 FEET, THAT WAS GREAT.BUT THERE ARE AREAS OF DOWNTOWN AND AREAS OF WEST CAMPUS WHERE IT'S BUILT INTO THE MAP.
MOVING FORWARD TO OUR SPEAKERS IN OPPOSITION, OUR PRIMARY SPEAKER IN OPPOSITION IS PAMELA BELL.
PAMELA, YOU'LL HAVE FIVE MINUTES.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
WHY IS THIS EVEN HAPPENING? THE APPLICATION OF EO IS EXCLUDED IN THE CODE SECTION 25 DASH TWO DASH 6 5 3 EQUITABLE TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT COMBINING DISTRICT REGULATIONS.
IF YOU READ THROUGH THE REGULATIONS, IT SAYS AN EO COMBINING DISTRICT MAY NOT BE COMBINED WITH ANY SPECIAL PURPOSE BASED DISTRICTS OR WITH ANY OF THE FOLLOWING ZONING DISTRICTS.
AND LAST BUT NOT LEAST IN THE LIST IS THE NORTH IS THE UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOOD OVERLAY UNO.
IN ADDITION, THE PROPOSED OUTLINE OF THE NORTH UNIVERSITY PORTION OF THE OVERLAY WOULD REPLACE A DENSE NEIGHBORHOOD OF LOW RISE MULTIFAMILY TOWNHOUSES AND SINGLE FAMILY HOMES WITH EIGHT STORY TOWERS.
WE DO NOT HAVE ANY HOUSING HIGHER THAN THREE STORIES IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.
WE DON'T WANT SUCH HOUSING TOWERING OVER THE ENTRANCE TO KIRBY HALL SCHOOL AND LOOKING OUT OVER HEMPHILL PARK.
WHITES AND UNIVERSITY ARE ONE WAY STREETS AND THEY'RE NARROW THAT MEET AT KIRBY HALL.
THIS WOULD CREATE A PROBLEM FOR PARENTS PICKING UP AND DROPPING OFF CHILDREN.
AND I ASK, IS THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN TRULY INTENDED FOR STUDENTS? THERE IS PLENTY OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR STUDENTS IN THE NORTH UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOOD.
IT IS JUST NOT LUXURY HOUSING.
NORTH UNIVERSITY SAYS THUMBS DOWN TO THE UNO OVERLAY THAT COVERS OUR PORTION OF THE OUTER WEST CAMPUS.
OUR NEXT SPEAKER IN OPPOSITION IS BETSY GREENBERG.
BETSY, YOU'LL HAVE THREE MINUTES.
MY NAME IS BETSY GREENBERG AND I APOLOGIZE.
I SPOKE ABOUT ITEM 11 WHEN I WAS CALLED TO SPEAK ABOUT ITEM 12.
I'M NOT OPPOSED TO THE POSTPONEMENT OF ITEM 12 AND AS TEMPTING AS IS TO REPEAT MYSELF AS TO DOUBLE THE CHANCE THAT I'M HEARD, I'LL SPARE YOU.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS CHAIR.
THAT CONCLUDES THE SPEAKERS ON THIS ITEM.
ALRIGHT, WE'LL OPEN IT UP FOR QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION AND I WANT TO RECOGNIZE TRUSTEE HUNTER JOINING US THIS EVENING.
WHO HAS OUR FIRST QUESTION? YES, MR. HILLER.
SO ALAN, YOU'RE THE GUY THAT PRESENTED, RIGHT? SORRY, I'M ALAN BONNEY PAUL THE ONE.
YOU'RE, YOU'RE RICHARD, IS THAT RIGHT? UH, MY NAME IS PAUL.
PAUL, YEAH, SORRY, THE AGENDA SAID ALAN, BUT I PRESENTED.
ALL RIGHT, WILL, REGARDLESS, THANKS FOR BEING HERE.
CAN YOU WALK ME THROUGH, 'CAUSE I, MAYBE I MISSED IT AND OBVIOUSLY THIS IS MY FIRST MEETING, BUT TALK TO ME ABOUT THE GOAL.
THE GOAL IS MAKING STUDENT HOUSING MORE AFFORDABLE.
IT'S LIKE, GIVE ME THE HIERARCHY OF WHAT WE'RE, WHAT WE'RE, WHAT'S THE GOAL HERE? YEAH, SO, UM, YOU KNOW, AS I SAID AT THE BEING THE PRESENTATION, THE, THE RESOLUTION'S GOALS WERE TO PROVIDE QUALITY, SAFE AND AFFORDABLE LIVING, ESPECIALLY FOR STUDENTS.
AND KIND OF THE, YOU KNOW, MAIN STRATEGIES THAT I DESCRIBED WERE INCREASING HOUSING CAPACITY AND AFFORDABILITY, ENSURING ACCESS TO DAILY NEEDS AND SERVICES AND SUPPORTING THE LIGHT RAIL AND MO MOBILITY ENHANCEMENTS THAT ARE PLANNED FOR THE AREA.
SO, UM, THAT'S, YOU KNOW, MAKING CHANGES TO THE EXISTING PROGRAM THAT INCREASE THOSE GOALS OR LEAD TO THOSE GOALS.
UM, THAT'S THE MAIN MOTIVATION.
[00:55:01]
I GUESS THEN, HELP ME UNDERSTAND WHERE AND WHY WOULD YOU DRAW ANY DISTINCTION? AND I, I, I UNDERSTAND YOU'RE TRYING TO HAVE LIKE DIFFERENT TYPES OF, UM, HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS SO THAT YOU COULD KIND OF, UM, AND I'M, I'M SURE I DON'T KNOW THE NOMENCLATURE CORRECT ME, BUT BASICALLY YOU COULD GRADUAL, YOU COULD, YOU COULD MAKE THE HEIGHT GO FROM UH, THE 600 FEET AREA DOWN TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES DOWN THE FAR END OF THE BOUNDARIES, RIGHT? SO HOW DO YOU ARRIVE AT, THIS IS WHERE WE WANNA GO TALL AND THIS IS WHERE WE WANT TO BE APPROXIMATELY HALF AS TALL, RIGHT? LIKE HOW, HOW DO, HOW DO YOU GET TO THOSE DISTINCTIONS? YEAH, SO THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION.I MEAN, WE DID A LOT OF ANALYSIS OF PARTICIPATION IN THE DENSITY BONUS PROGRAM AND WE LOOKED AT BUILDING PERMITS, UM, YOU KNOW, ALL BUILDING PERMITS THAT WERE SUBMITTED THROUGH THE PROGRAM.
UM, AND YOU KNOW, TWO MAIN, UH, BUILDING TYPOLOGIES EMERGED REALLY THE MID-RISE DEVELOPMENT THAT'S, YOU KNOW, BUILT WITH WOOD CONSTRUCTION AND THEN HIGH-RISE DEVELOPMENT THAT'S BUILT WITH, YOU KNOW, CONCRETE AND STEEL.
AND THOSE WERE THE MAIN THINGS THAT WERE, UM, DEVELOPMENTS WERE WANTING TO, OR DEVELOPERS WERE WANTING TO PROVIDE IN THE AREA.
UM, AND SO, UM, THE KIND OF 90 FOOT WOULD ALLOW FOR THAT MID-RISE DEVELOPMENT, WHEREAS THE 420 AND 600 FEET IS WHERE WE'RE PROMOTING THE HIGH RISE, UH, DEVELOPMENT TO TAKE PLACE.
UM, AND SO, YOU KNOW, I THINK, UM, THERE COULD HAVE BEEN, YOU KNOW, MORE GRADATION I GUESS YOU COULD SAY THAT'S SCALING OF THOSE AREAS.
UM, BUT BECAUSE THE DEVELOPMENT, UM, THAT WE SAW TAKE PLACE WAS REALLY THOSE TWO TYPOLOGIES, THOSE WERE THE HEIGHTS THAT WE PROPOSED.
UM, AND IN TERMS OF WHERE WE WANTED TO LOCATE THOSE SUBDISTRICTS, WE DID SOME KIND OF SUITABILITY ANALYSIS BASED OFF OF, UM, EXISTING USE OF THE PROPERTY, UM, PROXIMITY TO, UH, TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS, THE CAMPUS ITSELF, OTHER THINGS LIKE GROCERY STORES, UM, AS WELL AS THE EXISTING HEIGHT ALLOWANCES OF THE KIND OF EXISTING HEIGHT MAP FOR THE, UH, DENSITY BONUS PROGRAM.
UM, YEAH, I JUST WANTED TO ADD, UH, ALAN POTTY PRINCIPLE PLANNER PLANNING DEPARTMENT, UH, I WANTED TO ADD AS WELL THAT WE WERE FOLLOWING SOME OF THE GUIDANCE WITHIN THE RESOLUTION ABOUT, UM, EXPANDING OR INCREASING THE HEIGHTS WITHIN INTERWEST AND EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES OF INTERWEST CAMPUS, UM, AS WELL AS ADOBE DISTRICT.
SO KIND OF USING A COMBINATION OF THOSE ITEMS. SO ANOTHER WAY YOU MIGHT LOOK AT THIS IS THAT IT'S TRANSITIONING LAND KIND OF GRADUALLY, RIGHT? LIKE THE, THE HOUSING STOCK THAT WAS THERE 20 YEARS AGO WAS MOSTLY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES AND DUPLEXES THAT'S NOW BEEN REDEVELOPED INTO HIGHER DENSITY STUFF.
THIS IS KIND OF THE NEXT STAGE AS WE GET CLOSER TO LAMAR TO KIND OF, YOU KNOW, SEGUE INTO EVEN HIGHER DENSITY.
DOES THAT SOUND RIGHT? I WOULD, I WOULD SAY THAT THAT SOUNDS RIGHT.
I WOULD ALSO SAY, YOU KNOW, IT'S ALSO HOW CAN WE UTILIZE THE KIND OF REMAINING PARCELS THAT HAVEN'T UNDEVELOPED OR HAVEN'T REDEVELOPED, UM, TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE.
UM, YOU KNOW, THERE HAS BEEN A LOT OF DEVELOPMENT THAT HAS TAKEN PLACE IN UNO IN THE LAST 20 YEARS.
UM, THERE'S ALSO A LOT OF, UM, YOU KNOW, PROPERTY OWNERS THAT MIGHT NOT, UH, PARTICIPATE IN THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS LIKE YOU WOULD SEE OF, UH, OF OTHERS LIKE, UH, FRATERNITY HOUSES AND SORORITY HOUSES AND AND CHURCHES AND THINGS LIKE THAT.
SO THERE, THERE'S UH, A LOT OF THOSE, UH, TYPE OF PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE AREA.
AND SO THERE'S FEWER REMAINING KIND OF DEVELOPABLE PARCELS.
AND SO HOW CAN THOSE BE UTILIZED TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE TO PROVIDE, UM, FOR THE, YOU KNOW, THE PRIORITIES OF THE COMMUNITY AND WHAT WOULD BE THE ARGUMENT AGAINST JUST GOING HIGHER DENSITY ALL THE WAY DOWN TO LAMAR? UM, AGAIN, IT WAS BASED ON KIND OF THE STUDY FOR THE HOUSING CAPACITY, UM, NEEDED FOR THE AREA AS WELL AS WHAT WAS ALREADY AVAILABLE.
AND YOU KNOW, THAT WAS PART OF THE, UH, REASONING FOR WHY WE EXPANDED THE AREAS WE EXPANDED TO SO WE COULD HAVE THE HOUSING CAPACITY NEEDED, UM, WHILE ALLOWING DENSITY CLOSEST TO AGAIN, CAMPUS AND MOBILITY AND YOU KNOW, LIGHT RAIL.
SO YOU'RE, YOU'RE BASICALLY SAYING LIKE WE SORT OF THOUGHT ABOUT IT ABOUT LIKE HOW MANY UNITS WOULD WE ANTICIPATE NEEDING AND THIS YEAH, EXACTLY.
AND WE LOOKED AT WHAT SITES ARE LIKELY TO REDEVELOP, LIKE YOU MENTIONED, A LOT OF THE UNO AREA HAS ALREADY DEVELOPED IN THE LAST 20 YEARS.
UM, AND WE HAVE PROPERTIES THAT ARE LESS LIKELY TO DEVELOP SUCH AS THE ONES YOU MENTIONED.
UM, SO WE STARTED ANALYZING WHAT ARE THE REMAINING PROPERTIES, HOW MUCH HOUSING CAPACITY CAN EXIST ON THOSE, HOW MUCH MORE DO WE NEED TO EXPAND AND WHAT HEIGHTS, YOU KNOW, CAN WE LOOK AT? VERY COOL.
ALRIGHT, UM, COMMISSIONER ANDERSON, I BELIEVE YOU HAVE THE NEXT QUESTION.
HEY GUYS, IT'S GOOD TO SEE EVERYONE HERE
[01:00:01]
TODAY TALKING ABOUT THIS.SO, UH, I KNOW THAT THIS BODY INITIATED REMOVING HEIGHT CAPS IN UNO ABOUT A YEAR AND A HALF AGO.
AND AT THE TIME CITY COUNCIL WAS LOOKING AT ELIMINATING WINDOWLESS BEDROOMS AND SO THAT PASSED AND SINCE THEN WE'VE WATCHED ZERO BUILDINGS BREAK GROUND IN WEST CAMPUS AND I KNOW ONE OF THE IDEAS WAS TO KIND OF COUNTER THE NEW COSTS THAT THAT'S GONNA HAVE OF HAVING KIND OF SMALLER TOWERS AND KIND OF GIVE THEM MORE OF A GIVE TO HAVE TALLER TOWERS NOW.
AND SO IT'S SURPRISING TO SEE THESE AFFORDABILITIES NUMBERS CHANGE SO MUCH.
SO CAN YOU WALK US THROUGH THAT? 'CAUSE I KNOW THE ORIGINAL CONVERSATION WAS THEY WEREN'T GONNA CHANGE AND NOW WE'RE SEEING A LOT OF CHANGES HERE.
SO CAN YOU WALK US THROUGH THE AFFORDABILITY CHANGES? UM, YEAH, I MEAN, SO I'M NOT FAMILIAR WITH, YOU KNOW, WHAT AFFORDABILITY MAY HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED PREVIOUSLY.
UM, BUT WE HAD A CONSULTANT HELP US ANALYZE, UH, YOU KNOW, THE CURRENT CONDITIONS IN THE MARKET, UM, AS WELL AS OBVIOUSLY THE INCREASED HEIGHTS THAT ARE BEING PROPOSED.
SO THE COST ASSOCIATED WITH THOSE DEVELOPMENTS, UM, AND THOSE HEIGHTS, UH, AS WELL AS, YOU KNOW, THE COST, UM, THAT THOSE AFFORDABLE UNITS, UM, YOU KNOW, COST TO A DEVELOPMENT PER SE.
UM, AND SO WE WERE TRYING TO MAXIMIZE AFFORDABLE HOUSING THAT IS ABLE TO BE PROVIDED IN EACH SUB-DISTRICT.
UM, THAT IS ALSO WHY THERE IS A DISTINCTION OF TIERS SO THAT DEVELOPMENTS CAN CHOOSE KIND OF WHAT HEIGHT MAKES THE MOST SENSE FOR THEM, UM, RELATED TO DENSITY THAT THEY'RE TRYING TO ACHIEVE AND THE AFFORDABILITY THAT CAN ACHIEVE, UM, INSTEAD OF CHOOSING ONE FLAT NUMBER.
SO CURRENT CONDITIONS ARE YIELDING ZERO.
SO I GUESS I'M JUST SURPRISING TO WATCH THEM NOW STEP UP AS MUCH AS THEY ARE.
UM, SO WHEN IT COMES TO SETBACKS, WALK, CAN, CAN CLARIFY SOMETHING ABOUT THAT REAL QUICK, LET'S GET BACK TO THAT IN A MINUTE.
SO SETBACKS, IT LOOKS LIKE ALL OF A SUDDEN WE'RE TALKING ABOUT A LOT OF SETBACKS HERE.
I KNOW THIS BODY HAS REMOVED THE IDEAS OF SETBACKS IN A COUPLE OF DIFFERENT ZONING CATEGORIES HAVE COME BEFORE US.
SO WHY ALL THE SETBACKS? THERE'S QUITE A FEW SETBACKS IN THESE.
UM, THERE'S REALLY ONLY ONE NEW SETBACK.
IT IS THE TOWER SPACING, UM, THAT I BELIEVE YOU'RE REFERRING TO.
UM, AGAIN, WE HEARD A LOT FROM COMMUNITY ABOUT THE TIGHTNESS BETWEEN BUILDINGS, UM, AS CURRENTLY, UH, IS OCCURRING IN UNO WHERE THERE IS VERY FEW, UH, SEPARATION BETWEEN TOWERS AND THAT PROVIDES VERY POOR QUALITY OF LIFE, UM, FOR NOT JUST RESIDENTS KIND OF FACING EACH OTHER THAT MIGHT NOT HAVE MANY WINDOWS, IF ANY, UM, AS WELL AS THE LIGHT THAT IS ABLE TO ACCESS BETWEEN THOSE UNITS AND DOWN TO THE PEDESTRIAN SCALE ZONE, WE DID A LOT OF RESEARCH AND WHILE OTHER PEER CITIES, UH, ACROSS THE COUNTRY WITHIN TEXAS ARE DOING FOR THEIR ZONES THAT HAVE HIGH RESIDENTIAL OR HIGH DEVELOPMENT, UM, AND MOST OF THOSE PEER CITIES HAVE FOR MORE INTENSE TOWER SPACING THAN WHAT WE ARE PROPOSING.
WHAT PURE CITIES, UH, DALLAS, ATLANTA, SEATTLE, VANCOUVER, PHILADELPHIA, NEW YORK.
I KNOW A COUPLE OF THOSE CITIES REALLY TRY AND SEE THE OCEAN AND WATERFRONT.
SO, UM, AS FAR AS SETBACKS GO, THERE'S ALSO THIS PIECE ADDED HERE ABOUT UNLESS NECESSARY TO ENSURE ADEQUATE FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS.
SO I KNOW AUSTIN FIRE LIKES THEIR WIDER LANES AND THEY, I LIKE THE IDEA OF US KIND OF BUILDING OUR CITY AROUND OUR TRUCKS INSTEAD OF BUILDING OUR TRUCKS AROUND OUR CITY.
IS THIS LOOKING TO MAKE LANES WIDER, WHICH ALWAYS ENCOURAGES KIND OF FASTER VEHICLES THAT JUST BE A SCARY THING IN WEST CAMPUS? UM, IT IS BASED ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE FIRE DEPARTMENT, WHICH I BELIEVE IS 30 FEET FROM THE CENTER LINE.
SO IT DEPENDS ON OBVIOUSLY THE, THE RIGHT OF WAY.
SO, UH, AS FAR AS NOTICE GOES, I'VE HEARD FROM SOME FOLKS REALLY WISHING THAT THE BOUNDARIES WERE CHANGING SOME, UM, WERE WE NOTICED IN SUCH A WAY WHERE WE HAVE FLEXIBILITY TO ALLOW FOR MORE HOUSING OR WILL WE NOTICE IN SUCH A WAY WHERE IT'S VERY TIGHT AND WE CAN'T DO ANYTHING? SO, UH, THE BOUNDARY FOR THE UNO CODE AMENDMENT, UH, SO PAPER DISTRICT AS AS WE HAVE CALLED THEM IN THE PAST, CAN BE MODIFIED, BE EXPANDED.
UM, AS UH, WE MENTIONED WE ARE ALSO BRINGING FORWARD AN NPA SO THAT WE'RE AN AMENDMENT TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND A REZONING AS PART OF THIS.
SO THE REZONING AND THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP ARE NOT ABLE TO BE AMENDED, BUT THE APPLICABILITY AREA WOULD BE, SO IF THIS ALL MOVE FORWARD, THE AREA THAT WE HAVE NOTICED CAN BE REZONED AND CHANGED FURTHER THEIR FUTURE LAND USE MAP ALL IN THE SAME ACTION.
IF THE BOUNDARY FOR THE APPLICABILITY OCCURRED TO BE WIDER, UM, THOSE PROPERTIES WOULD THEN HAVE TO DO THEIR OWN, UH, FUTURE LAND USE MAP UPDATE AND REZONING.
BUT THEY WOULD STILL BE ABLE TO HAVE, WE KNOW, AND IN LOVE SEEING THE PROVISIONS ON EARLY LEASING.
IT'S PRETTY WILD THAT STUDENTS ARE ALMOST BOMBARDED WITH, HEY LISA, LIKE TWO WEEKS AFTER SIGNING.
SO CAN YOU WALK US THROUGH WHAT THAT PROCESS IS GONNA LOOK LIKE OR, OR WHATEVER WE HAPPEN TO KNOW AT THIS POINT? YEAH, WE'RE STILL WORKING WITH THE LAW DEPARTMENT, BUT OUR PROPOSAL IS TO LIMIT, UH, LIKE YOU MENTIONED, UH, EARLY LEASING TO, UH, A WINDOW OF PRE-LEASE AND LEASE RENEWAL OFFERS.
SO CURRENTLY THERE IS NO LIMIT, UH, STUDENTS CAN BE OFFERED THAT THEY MOVE IN TO RE RENEW THEIR LEASE, OR IT CAN BE PRE-LEASED TWO YEARS IN ADVANCE, UH, WHATEVER.
UM, AND SO WE ARE STILL WORKING WITH STAKEHOLDERS, UM, IN THE LAW DEPARTMENT, BUT WE'RE LOOKING AT A SA SIX TO EIGHT MONTH WINDOW OF PRE-LEASING
[01:05:01]
OR LEASE RENEWAL.SO ALLOWING ENOUGH TIME FOR BOTH STUDENTS AND THE DEVELOPERS TO BE ABLE TO FILL UP THEIR BUILDINGS, UM, KNOW WHERE THEY'RE GONNA LIVE NEXT YEAR IF YOU'RE A STUDENT, UM, BUT ALSO NOT HAVE THAT PRESSURE TO RENEW AS SOON AS YOU MOVE IN.
THANK, UH, COMMISSIONER ANDERSON MADE A GOOD POINT ABOUT, UH, THE FACT THAT NOT MANY DEVELOPERS HAVE TAKEN ADVANTAGE OR NONE HAVE TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF THIS IN THE, UH, RECENT PAST.
AND SO I, I KNOW YOU'VE BEEN WORKING WITH A CONSULTANT TO ENSURE THAT, YOU KNOW, UH, THESE ARE NOT TOO ONEROUS, THE REQUIREMENTS, BUT HAVE YOU, IS THERE A WAY TO WORK DIRECTLY TALK DIRECTLY TO DEVELOPERS TO, YOU KNOW, IF NOT GET ACTUAL COMMITMENTS FROM THEM TO, UM, YOU KNOW, UH, GET A BETTER, UH, CLEAR ANSWER DIRECTLY FROM THEM THAT THEY CAN WORK WITH THESE REQUIREMENTS AND THESE REQUIREMENTS WOULD ALLOW THEM TO HAVE, UH, YOU KNOW, NEW STARTS IN THE, UH, NEW BUILDING STARTS IN THE NEAR FUTURE? SURE.
SO WE HAVE MET WITH, UH, MEMBERS OF THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY AND PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE AREA.
WE'VE MET EXTENSIVELY WITH THE UNIVERSITY AREA PARTNERS, WHICH IS A, A GROUP OF PROPERTY OWNERS, DEVELOPERS, COMMUNITY MEMBERS.
UM, WE'VE ALSO MET WITH THE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF AUSTIN, UM, AND, UH, YES, AI AUSTIN'S CHAPTER.
UM, AND I THINK WE ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THIS IS KIND OF A DIFFICULT TIME TO, YOU KNOW, CALIBRATE AFFORDABILITY LEVELS WITH LOTS OF UNCERTAINTY IN THE MARKET, WHETHER IT'S, YOU KNOW, TARIFFS OR INFLATION AFFECTING THE, THE COST OF PRICING, WHICH IS MAKING IT, YOU KNOW, A LITTLE BIT MORE DIFFICULT FOR, UM, YOU KNOW, OUR CONSULTANTS TO RUN THE NUMBERS AND FOR DEVELOPERS AS WELL.
UM, BUT YOU KNOW, WE'VE ALSO SEEN, YOU KNOW, SOME RELATIVELY RECENT, I MEAN, WE HAVE NEW UNITS DELIVERING, UM, RIGHT NOW WITH BUILDINGS UNDER CONSTRUCTION.
SO WE HAVE SEEN, YOU KNOW, DEVELOPMENT TAKING PLACE IN, IN UNO RECENTLY.
UM, BUT YES, WE ACKNOWLEDGE THAT, YOU KNOW, RIGHT NOW IT IS A BIT OF A DIFFICULT, UM, TIME IN THE MARKET.
I MEAN, IF IT'S A DIFFICULT TIME IN THE MARKET WITH THE UNCERTAINTY, IS THERE, HAS THERE BEEN CONSIDERATION IN THE, UM, YOU KNOW, VERY RECENT PAST TO ADJUST SOME OF THE REQUIREMENTS GIVEN THE CURRENT, UM, ADDITIONAL UNCERTAINTY IN THE MARKETPLACE FOR THESE DEVELOPERS? YEAH, AGAIN, I MEAN, THESE ARE THE NUMBERS THAT WE ARE USING FROM OUR CONSULTANT AND BASED ON THE, YOU KNOW, STUDY WE'VE DONE, I DID WANT TO CLARIFY ONE IN POINT THAT ANDERSON MADE, UM, THE PERCENTAGE, WHILE IT LOOKS LIKE IT MAY INCREASE BETWEEN THE TWO, UH, TIERS, UM, FOR TIER ONE, IF FOR THAT HEIGHT, IT IS 20% OF THOSE UNITS AS YOU GO ABOVE THAT TIER, IT IS ONLY 10% OF WHATEVER UNITS ARE ABOVE THAT.
SO SAY YOU BUILD A HUNDRED UNITS IN YOUR FIRST TIER OF HEIGHTS, YOU HAVE TO PROVIDE 20 UNITS OR BEDROOMS, SORRY.
UM, AND THEN AS YOU GO UP, SAY YOU BUILD ANOTHER A HUNDRED, IT'S ONLY 10 OF THOSE THAT IS REQUIRED.
SO OVERALL THE PERCENTAGE IS A LITTLE BIT LOWER.
SO WE'RE RECOGNIZING THAT SOME OF THESE CONSTRUCTION COSTS GO UP.
UM, SO THE OVERALL PERCENTAGE IS SLIGHTLY LOWER, BUT WE'RE STILL TRYING TO MAXIMIZE THAT AFFORDABLE HOUSING.
SO IT'S ACTUALLY NOT GOING UP.
AND THEN ONE LAST QUESTION ON THE CALIBRATION POINT, UH, GIVEN THAT MARKETING CONDITIONS ARE CONSTANTLY CHANGING, IS THERE A PLAN TO HAVE, UM, RECALIBRATION AT A CERTAIN FREQUENCY ONCE A YEAR, ONCE EVERY COUPLE OF YEARS, UM, OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT, UH, WITH THESE PLANS? YEAH.
THE, THE GOAL IS TO HAVE, UH, CALIBRATION.
WE DON'T HAVE AN EXACT TIMING FOR THE PERCENTAGE OF AFFORDABLE UNITS THAT BEING REQUIRED.
UH, THE FEE IN LIEU WILL BE UPDATED ANNUALLY.
UM, AND WE ARE, UM, CREATING IT IN A WAY AS WELL THAT IS A CALCULATION THAT STAFF CAN, UH, RUN ANNUALLY SO THAT IT'S UPDATED AS MARKET CONDITIONS CHANGE.
ALRIGHT, OTHER QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONER POWELL? WELL, FIRST OFF, I WANT TO THANK Y'ALL SO MUCH FOR PUTTING ALL THIS TOGETHER.
IT'S A 40 PAGE POWERPOINT, A LOT OF COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT, SO APPRECIATE Y'ALL ON THAT.
I ALSO WANNA CALL OUT SPECIFICALLY THE IMPORTANCE OF THE WINDOWLESS BEDROOM PROHIBITION.
I SAW THAT INCLUDED, HEARD FROM A LOT OF UT STUDENTS THAT THAT'S A HUGE PIECE FOR QUALITY OF LIFE.
SO JUST WANT TO THANK YOU ALL FOR THAT PIECE.
UM, AND I ALSO WANT TO, YOU KNOW, PILE ONTO WHAT, UH, COMMISSIONER ANDERSON'S SAYING WITH THE TOWER SPACING AS WELL.
I RECOGNIZE THE EXAMPLE ON SLIDE 27 AND THE PROPOSED CHANGE ON SLIDE 28, UH, DO SHOW LIKE OPTICALLY, IT LOOKS PRETTY INTENSE FOR THOSE TOWERS TO BE THAT CLOSE TO EACH OTHER.
BUT I ALSO WANT TO PUSH ON THE POINT OF THAT IS ADDING UNITS TO THAT DEVELOPMENT THAT'S MAXIMIZING IT.
AND WHEN THE WINDOWLESS BEDROOM PRO PROHIBITION IS GOING INTO EFFECT, I'M HOPEFUL THAT THERE COULD STILL BE MAXIMIZING OF THE LAND ITSELF THROUGH THAT HEIGHT, THROUGH THE CLOSENESS IF NEEDED, WHILE MAINTAINING QUALITY OF LIFE WITH THE WINDOWLESS BEDROOM PROHIBITION.
SO WANT TO, WANT TO CONTINUE TO PUSH THERE.
UH, AND AGAIN, THANK YOU ALL SO MUCH FOR BRINGING THIS PRESENTATION FORWARD.
UM, NEXT QUESTION, COMMISSIONER SKIM MORE.
[01:10:01]
SO I HAVE A QUESTION I OF CLARIFICATION AROUND THE NEW PARKING STANDARDS.I THINK IT'S ON SLIDE 19 OF THE PRESENTATION.
I JUST WANNA MAKE SURE THAT I'M UNDERSTANDING IT CORRECTLY.
UH, IT LOOKS LIKE MAXIMUM PARKING ALLOWANCE IS AT 40% OF AND, BUT WE ARE ALLOWING UP TO 60% IF PARKING IS PROVIDED UNDERGROUND.
CAN YOU, UH, KIND OF DESCRIBE THE THOUGHT PROCESS AROUND THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS? YEAH, IT'S, UM, IT, IT IS VERY SIMILAR OR I GUESS IT IS THE SAME AS THE ANALYSIS WE DID FOR DOWNTOWN PARKING, UM, LAST YEAR.
UM, WE ALSO LOOKED AT ALL OF THE SITE PLANS, UM, IN THE LAST 10 YEARS, 10 YEARS FOR, UH, UNO, UM, AND TRIED TO ANALYZE HOW MUCH PARKING IS BEING PROVIDED BOTH ABOVE GRADE AND BELOW GRADE, UM, TO COME UP WITH THOSE NUMBERS.
SO THEN OF WHEN YOU DID THAT ANALYSIS OF THE PARKING PROVIDED FOR THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENTS, ABOUT WHAT PERCENTAGE WAS THE AVERAGE? YEAH, THAT'S A GOOD, SO THE, THE TOTAL AVERAGE WAS ABOUT 56% OF UM, WHAT WAS FORMALLY THE REQUIRED.
UM, AND THAT WAS LOWER IN THE INNER WEST CAMPUS DISTRICT WITH THE HIGH RISE DEVELOPMENT, ABOUT 45%.
UM, WE ALSO SPOKE WITH SOME MEMBERS OF THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY THAT SAID, YOU KNOW, IN RECENT YEARS THAT THE PARKING RATIOS HAVE BEEN GOING DOWN AS WELL.
UH, I GUESS ON THAT ISSUE THEN OF, I THINK I UNDERSTAND IF WE'RE PROVIDING THAT PARKING UNDERGROUND, SO THE VISUAL IMPACT OF THE PARKING IS, UH, MITIGATED OF, WAS THERE ANY ANALYSIS DONE ON THE EXTERNALITIES OF THAT ADDITIONAL PARKING? ANY ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC THAT IT MIGHT GENERATE? NO, WE DID NOT.
OF MOVING ON TO SLIDE 20, I THINK IT'S 28.
IT'S JUST AROUND THE, THE SETBACKS OF, I, I DON'T FULLY UNDERSTAND THAT IF THE LOT FRONTAGE IS UNDER 100 FEET, THEN MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE FOR THE PORTIONS OF A BUILDING ABOVE 120 FEET IS 65%.
I KNOW THERE'S A PUZZLE HERE Y'ALL ARE TRYING TO SOLVE.
UM, SO WE UNDERSTAND THAT SOME OF THE PARCELS IN UNO ARE SMALLER AND MORE NARROW, UM, THAN OTHER PARTS OF THE, OF THE CITY.
SO ESSENTIALLY IF A LOT IS UNDER A HUNDRED FEET, FEET OF FRONTAGE, UM, IT NO LONGER HAS THE STRICT SETBACK REQUIREMENT FOR ANY OF THEIR TOWER SPACING.
INSTEAD OF THAT, UH, FOR ANY PORTION OF THE, OF THE BUILDING THAT IS 120 FEET OR HIGHER, IT CAN JUST COVER 65% OF ITS LOT.
SO, UM, IT CAN MOVE AROUND AS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE FOR THAT TOWER, UH, WITHIN THE LOT, BUT IT IS MAXED OUT AT 65% OF ITS LOT COVERAGE FOR THE TOWER.
UH, I THINK I HAVE A COUPLE MORE MINUTES STILL OF UNDER ENVIRONMENTAL.
I THINK WHEN YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT THE BOUNDARIES FOR THE NEWS DISTRICTS, SUB-DISTRICTS, YOU SPOKE ABOUT PUBLIC INPUT, PUBLIC INPUT AROUND CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES AND HOW THAT IMPACTED MAYBE THE DISTRICT BOUNDARIES.
COULD YOU ELABORATE ON THAT? YES.
UM, WE HAD ORIGINALLY, UH, BEEN PROPOSING TO INCLUDE A FEW PARCELS, UM, ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER, UH, THAT WERE WITHIN CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURE BUFFERS.
UM, AND A, A MAJORITY OF THE PARCEL WAS, WAS IN THAT.
UM, AND SO TO SOME OF THE FEEDBACK AND, UM, YOU KNOW, TALKING WITH OUR OTHER STAFF, WE DECIDED TO REMOVE THOSE FEW PARCELS THAT WERE WITHIN THOSE OR MOSTLY, OR YOU KNOW, VERY MUCH WITHIN THOSE CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL BUFFERS, BUFFERS MORE THAN 50%.
THAT'S ALL THE QUESTIONS I HAVE RIGHT NOW.
THANK YOU FOR THAT PRESENTATION.
UM, I JUST WANTED TO GET SOME CLARIFICATION ON THE PARSING A PART OF BEDROOM VERSUS UNIT AFFORDABILITY.
I HAVEN'T SEEN IT BROKEN OUT LIKE THAT.
CAN YOU GIVE US A LITTLE BIT MORE BACKGROUND ON THAT, PLEASE? YEAH, SO UNO UM, IS VERY UNIQUE PROGRAM.
IT'S MOSTLY GEARED TOWARDS STUDENT HOUSING.
UM, SO IN ONE OF THE UPDATES IN 20 19, 20 14, 20 14, SORRY, UH, THE ALLOWANCE WAS CREATED FOR UNO TO BE ABLE TO BE RENTED BY THE BEDROOM AND THE AFFORDABILITY TO BE PROVIDED BY THE BEDROOM.
SO WE ARE JUST CONTINUING THAT PRACTICE OF BEING ABLE TO BOTH RENT BY THE UNIT OR THE BEDROOM.
UM, WE, SOME OF THE FEEDBACK WE HEARD WAS THAT, UH, YOU KNOW, NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESSES AND OTHER, UH, LOCAL, YOU KNOW, AMENITIES, UM, STRUGGLE IN THE SUMMERTIME WHEN THERE'S NOT A LOT OF STUDENTS IN THE AREA.
AND SO THEY WERE HOPING THAT WE WOULD BE ABLE TO INCREASE THE RATIO OF STUDENTS TO FULL-TIME RESIDENTS.
CURRENTLY IT'S ABOUT 90% STUDENTS, 10% FULL-TIME.
UM, AND WE LOOKED AT A 70 30 SPLIT.
AND ONE OF THE WAYS WE WANTED TO INCENTIVIZE A LITTLE BIT MORE DEVELOPMENT FOR, UH, LONG-TERM FULL-TIME RESIDENTS, UH, WAS ALLOWING
[01:15:01]
FOR MORE RENTAL BY THE UNIT.UM, AS WE KNOW, GRADUATE STUDENTS, YOU KNOW, YOUNG ADULTS, PROFESSIONALS GRADUATING FROM SCHOOL, UM, COULD STILL LIVE IN THE AREA.
AND SO THE REASON FOR THAT CHANGE IS WE RECOGNIZE THAT RENTING BY THE BEDROOM, YOU CAN HAVE MORE PERCENTAGE OF BEDROOMS BEING AFFORDABLE VERSUS UNITS IF YOU REQUIRED 20% OF UNITS, NONE OF THE PROJECTS WERE PENCIL.
UH, WELL, OUR CONSULTANT HELPED US COME UP WITH THE NUMBERS TO CALCULATE WHAT COULD BE PROVIDED IF YOU WERE RENTING BY THE UNIT AS OPPOSED TO THE BEDROOM.
AND SO IS THE IDEA THAT A DEVELOPER COULD SET ASIDE SPECIFIC BEDROOMS WITHIN A UNIT AS AFFORDABLE AS OPPOSED TO MARKET RATE? OR WOULD ALL BEDROOMS WITHIN A UNIT NEED TO BE AFFORDABLE OR MARKET RATE? IT CAN BE CERTAIN BEDROOMS, UH, WITHIN A UNIT, BUT THAT THE WHOLE DEVELOPMENT WOULD BE RENTED BY THE BEDROOM AND THAT'S HOW IT CURRENTLY WORKS.
SO ONLY FOR DEVELOPMENTS WHERE ALL UNITS ARE ALSO BEDROOMS. EXACTLY, YEAH.
SO THE, THE BUILDING ITSELF HAS TO BE RENTED EITHER BY THE BEDROOM, ALL OF IT MARKET RATE AND AFFORDABLE OR BY THE UNIT, ALL OF IT.
SO FOR BUILDINGS THAT ARE BY THE UNIT, I'M SORRY, I'M JUST TRYING TO BE MM-HMM
FOR BUILDINGS THAT ARE RENTED BY THE UNIT, WHETHER THEY'RE TWO OR THREE BEDROOM UNITS, THEN THE AFFORDABILITY APPLIES TO THE UNITS.
20% OF UNITS UNITS, 10% OF UNITS, BUT YES.
ALL RIGHT, NEXT QUESTION, MS.
UH, I THINK IT'S REALLY COMMENDABLE THAT ONE OF THE THREE GOALS YOU GUYS HAVE IS INCREASING HOUSING CAPACITY, QUALITY AND AFFORDABILITY, ESPECIALLY FOR STUDENTS IN THE WEST CAMPUS AREA.
I NOTICED THAT WITH THE 20% AND 10% CAP, THAT STILL LEAVES 90 TO 80 TO 90% OF HOUSING AT MARKET RATE.
I WANT SOME CLARIFICATION TO KNOW HOW MANY AFFORDABLE STUDENT HOUSING UNITS ARE IN THE AREA EXISTING AND HOW MANY PROJECTED WITH THE, UM, AMENDED UNO THAT IT CAN PRODUCE IN THE FUTURE.
UM, LET ME PULL MY NOTES REAL QUICK.
AND I DO WANNA MAKE CLARIFICATION.
THESE ARE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS.
SO IF A DEVELOPER WANTED TO PROVIDE MORE AFFORDABLE UNITS, THEY WOULD BE MORE THAN WELCOME TO DO THAT ALMOST THERE.
I GUESS WHEN YOU'RE LOOKING FOR THE NUMBERS, UM, I WANTED TO ALSO UNDERSTAND HOW YOU GUYS ARRIVED AT THE 50% MFI.
SO WAS IT TO HAVE FEWER UNITS BUT AT A HIGHER LEVEL OF AFFORDABILITY VERSUS THE OPTION OF HAVING LIKE, UH, MORE UNITS AT HIGHER LEVEL MFI? SO TO ANSWER YOUR FIRST QUESTION, SORRY, THIS IS BROKEN OUT IN OUR STAFF REPORT, UH, ACROSS PRE 2014 AND POST 2014.
SO WE'RE HAVING TO DO A LITTLE BIT OF MATH, BUT 954 AFFORDABLE UNITS, UM, IN TOTAL THROUGH THE EXISTING PROGRAM.
UM, LET ME SEE, AND AS FAR AS PROJECTION, UM, 2,375 AFFORDABLE UNITS, UM, PROJECTED.
AND THAT'S ADDITIONAL TO THE EXISTING.
UM, AND WHAT WAS YOUR SECOND QUESTION AGAIN? SORRY.
OH, THE REASON FOR THE 50% MFI CALCULATION CAPPED AT 20% AND 10%.
THE, THE REASON FOR THE 50% MFI WAS, AGAIN, WE, YOU KNOW, HEARD FROM STAKEHOLDERS, UM, IN THE AREA THAT THE 60%, UH, WASN'T AS AFFORDABLE AS IT COULD BE.
UM, AND SO REALLY WE WERE TRYING TO TARGET KIND OF A LOWER MFI, SO TRULY STUDENTS COULD, UH, AFFORD THESE UNITS AS AFFORDABLE.
ALRIGHT, OTHER QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONER MAXWELL? YEAH, AND I'M A VISUAL PERSON, SO CAN WE BRING UP THE PRESENTATION? 'CAUSE I HAVE LOTS OF QUESTIONS.
UM, I'M GONNA START WITH A REALLY OBVIOUS ONE UNDER THE COMMUNITY BENEFITS.
IF YOU WANNA GO TO THAT SLIDE, WE'LL COME BACK TO THE MAP.
SO ONE OF THE THINGS I'M CONCERNED ABOUT IS THAT YOU HAVE THIS POTENTIAL COMMUNITY BENEFIT FOR AN 8,000 SQUARE FOOT, UM,
[01:20:01]
UH, GROCERY SHOPPING CENTER, I GUESS AS A POTENTIAL BENEFIT.AND IT SEEMS LIKE WE MIGHT BE ONLY TO GET ONE OR TWO.
UM, HAS THERE BEEN SOME CONSIDERATION OF HAVING DIFFERENT SORT OF SIZES OF, OF GROCERY STORES AND LIKE A GRADATION THERE VERSUS HAVING ONE VERY LARGE ONE, WHICH I KNOW IS AN ULTIMATE GOAL BUT THEN MIGHT NOT BE AVAILABLE TO OTHER PEOPLE? UM, AND THAT'S UNDER, YEAH.
THAT GROCERY STORE USE AND MAYBE WALKING THROUGH THOSE BENEFITS IN GENERAL SINCE WE HAVEN'T DISCUSSED THEM YET? UM, YEAH, AGAIN, YOU KNOW, AS YOU MENTIONED, UH, A LOT OF STAKEHOLDERS MENTIONED ONE OF THE BIG AREA NEEDS IS A GROCERY STORE.
UM, AND REALLY WHAT WE HEARD WAS KIND OF A LARGE SCALE GROCERY STORE AND NOT A SMALL KIND OF NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET IS REALLY WHAT THEY WERE LOOKING FOR.
UM, OBVIOUSLY A LOT OF THE SMALLER RETAIL SPACES IN THE AREA OR COMMERCIAL SPACES IN THE AREA CAN HAVE THOSE SMALLER MARKET TYPES.
UM, AND SO WE LOOKED AT SOME OF KIND OF THE STANDARD OF SMALLER GROCERY STORES TO FIND THE MINIMUM.
OBVIOUSLY IT'S A MINIMUM AND NOT A MAXIMUM.
SO IN, IN AN IDEAL WORLD, WE'D GET A VERY LARGE HEV OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT MM-HMM
UM, BUT WANTED TO BE REALISTIC ABOUT WHAT THE MINIMUM MIGHT BE.
UM, AND SO WE'RE TARGETING SOMETHING, YOU KNOW, WE USE FOR COMPARISON LIKE A TRADER JOE'S, A SMALL TRADER JOE'S, UM, AS KIND OF THE MINIMUM SIZE.
AND I GUESS MY CONCERN IS THAT ONE STORE IS GONNA GET THIS AND THEN THAT WON'T BE REALLY A VIABLE OPTION FOR ANY OTHER STORE BECAUSE THEY WON'T WANNA COMPETE.
SO I'M JUST CURIOUS ABOUT HOW WE ARE HAVING A BENEFIT THAT MAY ONLY END UP BENEFITING ONE BUILDING.
SO THAT'S JUST SOMETHING TO NOTE THAT I THINK IT'S NOT OPTIMALLY SET UP CURRENTLY AS A BENEFIT.
UM, IF WE CAN MOVE TO THE MAPS, BECAUSE I THINK A LOT OF FOLKS HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS ASPECT.
UM, SO OBVIOUSLY WHEN YOU ALL PUT THE NEW MAPS IN, THERE WAS, UH, SOME EXPANSION THE WITH THE NEW, BUT OBVIOUSLY WE SEE THE LITTLE CORNER THERE AND, AND I THINK THERE'S ALSO BEEN SOME CONCERNS THAT HAVE BEEN EXPRESSED TO US AS PLANNING COMMISSIONERS THAT SOME OF THIS IS SPLITTING DOWN THE STREET.
SO LET'S TALK ABOUT THAT FIRST.
WHEN YOU GUYS PUT IN THESE NEW MAPS, YOU DIDN'T NECESSARILY DO BOTH SIDES OF THE STREET, AND I UNDERSTAND THAT THAT'S PROBABLY FOR COMPATIBILITY REASONS, BUT CAN YOU WALK US THROUGH THAT DECISION MAKING PLEASE? UM, ARE YOU, YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT THE EXPANSION KIND OF OUTER WEST AREAS? YEAH.
SO WHEN YOU GET TO THOSE LIKE AT THE VERY EDGES, IT'S HARD TO SEE IN THAT MAP, BUT JUST SO FOLKS CAN UNDERSTAND THAT THE STREET, THE NEW BOUNDARIES MAY GO DOWN THE MIDDLE OF A ROAD VERSUS BEING ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STREET.
YEAH, WE LOOKED AT UH, BASICALLY THE ADJACENT KIND OF COMMERCIAL AND MULTI-FAMILY ZONED, UH, PROPERTIES ALONG THE OUTER WEST CAMPUSES AREAS THAT WE COULD EXPAND IN, UM, ALONG WITH TAKING THAT INTO ACCOUNT WITH KIND OF OUR HOUSING CAPACITY ANALYSIS.
SO IT WAS KIND OF A ANALYSIS OF HOW MUCH CAPACITY DID WE NEED FOR THE AREA AND AGAIN, WHERE COULD WE HAVE THAT, UM, WITHIN THE BOUNDARY THAT WE WERE EXPANDING.
YEAH, I GUESS MY SPECIFIC QUESTION IS WHY WE'RE GOING DOWN THE MIDDLE OF THE STREET AGAIN, BECAUSE IF YOU WALK THROUGH THAT SECTION OF UNO, YOU CAN LITERALLY SEE WHERE UNO ENDS AND THEN ACROSS THE STREET WHERE IT ISN'T AVAILABLE.
AND THAT SEEMS TO BE REPEATING THIS PAST MISTAKES.
SO I'M JUST CURIOUS IF THERE'S ANY FLEXIBILITY ABOUT HAVING ALL OF THESE APPLY ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STREET WHEN YOU DO THE BOUNDARIES.
UM, I MEAN DEFINITELY CAN BE AMENDED BY PLANNING COMMISSIONER OR COUNSEL, BUT YEAH, THAT WAS WHY WE DID IT THE WAY WE DID.
I THINK I STILL NOT UNDERSTANDING WHAT WAS THE CHOICE TO MAKE GO DOWN THE MIDDLE STREET AGAIN WHEN THAT'S BEEN AN ONGOING CONCERN WITH RELATES AS IT RELATES TO UNO? UM, AGAIN, WE LOOKED AT WHAT THE CURRENT ZONING WAS AND HOW IT COULD BE APPLIED WITHIN UNO.
SO, UM, COMMERCIAL AND MULTIFAMILIES THAT WERE ADJACENT TO IT, UM, AS WELL AS HOW MUCH HOUSING CAPACITY WAS NEEDED.
AND THEN I GUESS RELATED TO THAT LOVELY CORNER, UM, WE'VE UNDERSTAND THAT THERE'S A FAIR AMOUNT OF CONS RIGHT NOW, SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING THERE.
IS IT, THE IDEA IS THAT THAT THAT WILL JUST CONTINUE TO BE UNDERDEVELOPED.
IS THAT AREA NOW AVAILABLE TO LIKE DBE TODD OR OTHER PROGRAMS BECAUSE OF WHERE IT'S LOCATED? THAT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING.
THERE ARE PORTIONS OF THAT AREA.
I DON'T THINK IT COVERS ENTIRE, UH, AREA ALL THE WAY TO NORTH LAMAR.
UM, BUT YES, PORTIONS OF THAT CURRENTLY HAVE E TODD.
SO WOULD WE NOT WANT TO THEN EXTEND THE OUTER WEST AREA TO INCLUDE THE AREAS THAT WERE ALREADY GONNA BE TOUCHED BY E DV E TODD? WHY WOULD WE NOT HAVE THEM FALL UNDER BOTH PROGRAMS TO OPTIMIZE WHAT WE COULD GET? UM, AGAIN, I MEAN WE WERE FOCUSED KIND OF ON WHAT HOUSING CAPACITY WE WERE LOOKING FOR UNO AND STUDENT HOUSING RELATED.
UM, SIMILARLY TO THE NORTH FOR EXAMPLE, I'M SURE, UM, PEOPLE HAVE BROUGHT THAT UP.
E TODD COVERS, UH, A GOOD PORTION OF THE AREA TO THE NORTH OF UNO, UM, SINCE THE LIGHT RAIL CONTINUES THROUGH THERE.
UM, AND SO THAT AREA CAN ALREADY ACHIEVE HEIGHTS OF 120 FEET OR 90 FEET DEPENDING ON WHICH SUBDISTRICT THEY'RE IN.
UM, HAVE, YOU KNOW, SIMILAR AFFORDABILITY REQUIREMENTS BY RENTAL BY THE UNIT.
UM, SO WE DIDN'T WANT THOSE TO NECESSARILY BE IN COMPETITION WITH EACH OTHER, ESPECIALLY WHEN WE FOUND THAT THE HOUSING CAPACITY FOR UNO COULD BE FOUND WITH OUR PROPOSAL.
SO JUST TO BE CLEAR THOUGH, WHEN YOU DO DBE TODD, YOU DON'T NECESSARILY GET ALL THE SAME BENEFITS OF UNO, ESPECIALLY AS IT RELATES TO WALKABILITY AND THE STUDENT PROTECTIONS, OR WILL THAT ACTUALLY BE INCLUDED IN DBE TODD AS WELL? SO I GUESS DBE TODD DOES NOT REQUIRE THE SAME STREET SCAPE ELEMENTS AS, UM, UNO DOES.
IT REQUIRES COMPLIANCE WITH SUB CHAPTER E UH, OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES SOME STREET SCAPE ELEMENTS.
ALL RIGHT, COMMISSIONERS, WE ARE AT THE END OF OUR EIGHT
[01:25:01]
SPOTS.UM, JUST A SHOW OF HANDS, WHO ELSE HAS QUESTIONS VICE? SURE.
UM, UNLESS THERE'S OBJECTION, WE'LL PICK UP VICE-CHAIRS QUESTIONS AND WE CAN KEEP GOING IF THERE ARE ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS.
I APPRECIATE MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS AS WELL.
UM, THE FIRST QUESTION I HAD FOR STAFF WAS, I, I DO APPRECIATE GOING FROM THE 60% MEDIUM FAMILY INCOME REQUIREMENT TO THE 50%, JUST TRYING TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE MORE AFFORDABLE UNITS.
DO WE HAVE ANY UNDERSTANDING OF LEASES WITHIN THAT 60%? I'M TRYING TO UNDERSTAND IT, IT'S IN SOCIAL SERVICES CALLED CLIFF EFFECTS.
ESSENTIALLY IF YOU MAKE 52% MFI SUDDENLY YOU'RE NOT ELIGIBLE.
DOESN'T MEAN THAT YOU CAN FIND A MARKET RATE UNIT, IT JUST MEANS YOU'RE NOT ELIGIBLE FOR THE AFFORDABLE PROGRAM.
ARE YOU CONCERNED ABOUT THAT OR IS IT THAT MOSTLY WHEN WE'RE LOOKING AT STUDENTS WITHIN THAT AFFORDABLE, THEY'RE REALLY, THEIR INCOMES ARE MORE MATCHING TO 50%.
SO, UM, THERE THERE'S TWO WAYS THAT YOU CAN BE ELIGIBLE FOR THE UNO PROGRAM.
IT'S THE NORMAL INCOME VERIFICATION PROCESS.
IT'S ALSO IF YOU RECEIVE ANY TYPE OF FINANCIAL AID, UM, THEN THAT MAKES YOU AUTOMATICALLY ELIGIBLE FOR THE PROGRAM.
SO, UM, IF YOU KNOW, UH, ANY, UH, STUDENT THAT GOES TO UT WHO'S RECEIVING FINANCIAL AID, SO THAT'S NOT REALLY THE SAME CONCERN ABOUT THE, OF A CLIFF, I GUESS, OF INCOME LEVELS THAT THERE MIGHT BE IN OTHER PROGRAMS. I APPRECIATE THAT.
AND I, AND I KNOW IT'S VERY HARD DATA TO HAVE.
I'M ASSUMING WE DON'T HAVE DATA ON ACTUAL VERIFIED INCOME OF THE TENANTS IN THE AFFORDABLE UNITS.
NO, BUT I, I DO KNOW THAT MOST OF THEM DO QUALIFY THROUGH THE FINANCIAL AID KIND OF COMPONENT OF IT AS OPPOSED TO THE INCOME VERIFICATION, UH, VERSION OR OPTION.
THAT'S REALLY HELPFUL, THANK YOU.
THE OTHER, COULD YOU TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE TRANSIT CORE DISTRICT? I KNOW THAT'S SORT OF NEW, PARTICULARLY THE FRONTAGE ALONG THE DRAG.
I KNOW WE'VE GOTTEN, THAT'S A BIG CHANGE FROM THE HEIGHTS THAT WE HAD THERE BEFORE.
UM, AND WE'VE GOTTEN SOME FEEDBACK ON THAT FROM THE COMMUNITY AND THE SORT OF THE COMMUNICATION THAT WE'RE RECEIVING.
CAN Y'ALL TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE THOUGHT PROCESS? WAS IT JUST ALIGNING WITH EO, LIKE WHAT, HOW DID THAT SORT OF COME ABOUT? UM, YEAH, SO AGAIN, WE WERE, YOU KNOW, SOMEWHAT FOLLOWING, UM, THE DIRECTION FROM COUNCIL TO EXPAND THE BOUNDARIES OF INTERWEST, UM, AS WELL AS KIND OF THE INCREASED TIGHTS.
UH, WE ALSO RECOGNIZE THAT THAT IS THE AREA CLOSEST TO CAMPUS AND THE LIGHT RAIL, UM, SOMEWHERE WE WANTED THE MOST DENSITY.
UM, WE ALSO KNOW THAT A LOT OF THE PROPERTIES ALONG THE DRAG, UM, AND THE GUADALUPE SUBDISTRICT HAVE HEIGHT ALLOWANCES THAT ARE MUCH GREATER THAN WHAT IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED THERE.
AND THERE HAS NOT BEEN MUCH PARTICIPATION IN THAT SUB-DISTRICT.
UM, SO IT DOES NOT APPEAR THAT THE, YOU KNOW, CURRENT CALL IT MID-RISE DEVELOPMENT THAT COULD OCCUR THERE IS REALLY OCCURRING, UM, UNDER THE CURRENT MAR MARKET CONDITIONS.
UM, SO THAT WAS ANOTHER REASON WHY, UH, HIGH-RISE WAS, YOU KNOW, PROPOSED FOR THAT AREA.
YEAH, JUST TO EXPAND ON THAT, I THINK ONE OF THE ONLY, UH, REDEVELOPMENTS HAVE TAKEN PLACE IN UNO THAT DID NOT PARTICIPATE WAS ON, UH, THE, ON GUADALUPE.
IT WAS A DRIVE THROUGH BURGER RESTAURANT, UM, WHICH IS NOT NECESSARILY SERVING THE, THE GOALS OF INCREASING HOUSING CAPACITY.
UM, SO, YOU KNOW, SEEING HOW WE COULD, UH, YOU KNOW, SERVE THOSE GOALS BETTER IN THE AREA.
UM, AND TO ADDRESS SOME OF THE CONCERNS ABOUT THE PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT ALONG, UH, GUADALUPE, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE THE, OBVIOUSLY THE STREET SCAPE REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE BEING ENHANCED, UM, BASED OFF OF THE STREET LEVEL.
UM, UOV REQUIRED TO PROVIDE THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT UNDER THE, UH, TRANSPORTATION CRITERIA MANUAL.
AND, AND GUADALUPE STREET IS THE HIGHEST, UH, LEVEL STREET IN THE AREA, SO IT WOULD BE A WIDER SIDEWALK.
UM, AND WE DO HAVE ALSO THE, UM, STREET WALL, UM, SETBACK AT 65 FEET.
SO FROM A PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE, UM, THERE WOULD BE A 12 FOOT SETBACK.
SO THE BUILDING FRONTAGE NEXT TO YOU WOULD BE 65 FEET, NOT, UH, 600 FEET.
SO THAT'S ACTUALLY REALLY HELPFUL.
UM, I'M GONNA ASK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE CHAPTER 14 CHANGES.
I KNOW THEY'RE NOT 25 DASH TWO.
UM, ARE THEY EXPECTED TO GO TOGETHER AT THE SAME TIME? IS, IS THAT CURRENTLY WHAT'S BEING PLANNED? YES, THAT'S CORRECT.
SO WE WERE PLANNING ON BRINGING THAT ALONG WITH THE UNO AMENDMENTS TO PLANNING COMMISSION AND COUNCIL.
AND, AND CAN YOU, CAN I MAKE A REQUEST THAT THOSE BE ADDED TO THE BACKUP FOR OUR BODY AS WELL? AGAIN, I KNOW WE DO NOT APPROVE THEM, BUT IT WOULD BE GREAT TO HAVE THAT CONTEXT.
UM, JUST RELATED TO THAT, I DID HAVE A QUESTION.
SO I KNOW WE'RE LOOKING AT SEEING THAT IF, UM, SOMEONE IS PRE-LEASING BUT THE UNIT HAS NOT DELIVERED ON TIME, I KNOW WE'VE HAD A LOT OF ISSUES WITH THAT.
CAN YOU ALL TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT HOW WE'RE HANDLING THAT ISSUE? Y YES.
SO, UM, INCLUDED IN THE AMENDMENTS TO FOUR 18 WOULD BE A REQUIREMENT FOR A A LEASE ADDENDUM, UM, WHICH WOULD, UM, KIND OF SPELL OUT THE ACCOMMODATIONS, UM, THAT WOULD BE, UM, UH, REQUIRED IN THE CASE THAT, YOU KNOW, THERE'S A DELAY OF OCCUPANCY.
UM, AND SO THAT INCLUDES NOTICE REQUIREMENTS AS WELL AS REMEDY OPTIONS, UM, LIKE A, A LI TENANT BEING
[01:30:01]
ENTITLED TO, ENTITLED TO RENT ABATEMENT, UM, OR PROVIDED WITH COMPENSATION FOR TEMPORARY RELOCATION INCLUDING, UH, RELOCATION COSTS, ALTERNATIVE ACCOMMODATIONS, UM, STORAGE AND MEAL STIPENDS.UM, AND, AND SO THAT'S KIND OF THE, UH, THE PROPOSAL.
I APPRECIATE THAT AND I HOPE THAT WE CAN INCLUDE IN IT THE ABILITY TO BREAK A LEASE WITHOUT ANY PENALTIES AND FULL AVAILABILITY OF DEPOSITS MADE.
YES, THAT WAS PART OF IT, YES.
OTHER QUESTIONS? YES, COMMISSIONER HANEY.
I JUST HAVE ONE VERY QUICK QUESTION ON THE NORTHEAST, UH, SIDE OF THE OUTER WEST, UH, ZONE, THERE'S A LITTLE TRIANGLE THERE, BOUNDED BY, UH, FRU 29TH AND GUAD.
UM, AND I KNOW RIGHT NOW THAT IS A AUTO ORIENTED BUSINESS, UM, BUT I SEE A LOT OF OTHER COMMERCIAL THERE THAT WE'VE INCLUDED IN THIS DISTRICT.
IS THERE A REASON WHY WE DIDN'T INCLUDE THAT? IS ARE WE NOT NOTICED FOR IT OR? UM, YEAH, SO IF YOU WERE TO LOOK AT THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATEMENT FOR THE PROJECT CONNECT, UH, PLANNED LIGHT RAIL PROJECT THERE, UM, THERE WILL BE, YOU KNOW, THAT LAND WILL BE ENCUMBERED, UH, BY THE, BY THE LIGHT RAIL ALIGNMENT.
UM, OTHER QUESTIONS? I HAD ONE, AND THIS IS SHOULD BE QUICK, I JUST A CLARIFICATION ON THE GATEKEEPING SLIDE.
YOU MENTIONED, UM, THAT THE ON THERE WOULD BE ONSITE WATER REUSE SYSTEM REQUIRED, AND IS THAT SOMETHING WITH THE WATER FORWARD PLAN THAT WAS ADOPTED LAST YEAR, IS THAT SOMETHING THAT'S ALREADY REQUIRED FOR DEVELOPMENTS OF THIS SIZE? SO IT IS REQUIRED, UM, FOR PRODUCTS OVER A CERTAIN SIZE, WHICH PART, PARTICIPATING DEVELOPMENTS WOULD BE OVER THAT SIZE, BUT THEY'RE ALSO ELIGIBLE TO PAY A FEE IN LIEU INSTEAD OF PROVIDING THE ONSITE WATER REUSE SYSTEM.
UM, SO IF THEY WERE TO CHOOSE THIS COMMUNITY BENEFIT, THEY WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO DO THAT FEE IN LIEU OPTION AND THEY WOULD NEED TO REQUIRE THE SYSTEM ON OF OR PROVIDE THE SYSTEM ONSITE.
THANK YOU FOR THAT CLARIFICATION.
UM, WE'LL ALLOW, YEAH, GO AHEAD.
UH, SORRY, I'M GONNA, I'LL ASK THESE REAL QUICK 'CAUSE THEY MAY BE EASY ONES.
DO YOU HAVE ANY INFORMATION ON THE BACKLOG OF, OF, OF, OF STUDENTS SEEKING AFFORDABLE HOUSING ONE AND TWO, WHAT IS THE PLAN FOR ADMINISTRATION, UM, FOR THE, THE, THE OBJECTIVE THAT YOU HAVE WITH TRYING TO LIMIT LEASE RENEWALS? LIKE HOW WILL YOU POLICE THAT? IN OTHER WORDS? SO THAT WOULD, UH, SIMILAR TO A LOT OF OUR, UM, YOU KNOW, FOUR 18 UH, KIND OF DENSITY BONUS PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS, UM, THEY'RE ACTUALLY, UM, KIND OF MEMORIALIZED IN A LAND USE AND RESTRICTIONS AGREEMENT THAT'S APPLIED TO THE PROPERTY.
UM, SO, UH, THE DEVELOPER WOULD BE, AND, AND PROPERTY MANAGER WOULD BE REQUIRED TO ABIDE BY THAT LAND USE AND RESTRICTIONS AGREEMENT, WHICH WOULD SPELL OUT, UM, THE LEASE UM, RESTRICTION OR THE RESTRICTION ON EARLY LEASING.
AND JUST TO ANSWER YOUR FIRST QUESTION, WE DON'T HAVE A LOG OF STUDENTS, YOU KNOW, SEEKING AFFORDABLE HOUSING, UM, HOUSING DEPARTMENT MAY, UM, BUT WE DON'T.
SO IS THAT THE END OF YOUR QUESTIONS? OKAY.
UM, COMMISSIONER POWELL, SO REFERENCING SLIDE 25, THE HOTEL MOTEL WITH LIMITATIONS, UM, ARE THOSE LIMITATIONS STAYING THE SAME AS THE EXISTING INNER WEST ONES WERE? UH, AND KIND OF JUST WALK ME THROUGH WHAT THOSE LOOK LIKE.
YEAH, SO, UM, THEY ARE A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT BECAUSE IN CURRENT UNO, THE HOTEL AND MOTEL ALLOWANCE IS KIND OF CALLED OUT ON A KIND OF STREET BY STREET, UH, BASIS, WHICH IS NOT REALLY HOW WE ARE ALLOWED TO DO IT IN EXISTING OR NEW DENSITY BONUSES.
UH, WHICH IS WHY IT IS BEING PROPOSED TO ONLY BE ALLOWED IN THE TRANSIT CORE.
UM, AND IT WILL ONLY BE ALLOWED IF YOUR BASE ZONE HAS THAT USE ALLOWED.
AND SO THAT'S KIND OF THE, THE LIMITATION OR THE CONDITION FOR IT.
I HAVE ONE MORE CLARIFYING QUESTION FOR SLIDE 26, THE GATEKEEPER COMMUNITY BENEFITS.
CAN YOU PROVIDE A FEW MORE EXAMPLES OF THE TRANSIT SUPPORTIVE INFRASTRUCTURE? DOES THAT INCLUDE SPACES LIKE PEDESTRIAN PLAZAS, EXPANDED BUS BAY BIKE DOCKS? THANKS.
I WOULD HAVE TO LOOK UP AGAIN A COUPLE OF THE EXAMPLES THAT PROJECT
[01:35:01]
CONNECT GAVE US, BUT IT WOULD HAVE TO BE APPROVED.IT'S SIMILAR TO WHAT IS IN CURRENT ETA DENSITY BONUS, UM, WHERE PROJECT CONNECT WOULD HAVE TO APPROVE OF THAT, UH, TRANSIT SUPPORTIVE INFRASTRUCTURE.
SO IT IS A SOMEWHAT LIMITED, UM, NUMBER OF UM, YOU KNOW, OPPORTUNITIES OR INFRASTRUCTURE THAT QUALIFIES FOR IT.
UM, BUT PROJECT CONNECT KIND HAS A LIST OF THINGS THEY ARE LOOKING FOR OR NEED, UH, WITHIN KIND OF THE UNO BOUNDARY AND COMMISSIONER MAXWELL.
SO, SORRY, JUST TWO FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS.
SO FIRST, UM, JUST TO CLARIFY THE QUESTION I WAS TOUCHING ON BEFORE REGARDING DBE TODD AND THE CHAPTER FOUR 18 PROPOSED CHANGES, WOULD THOSE BE EXPANDED INTO DBE TODD? SO ALL OF OUR NEW STUDENT PROTECTIONS WOULD THEN APPLY IN THE DBE E TODD OVERLAY AS WELL? I GUESS I'M JUST TRYING TO CLARIFY HOW FAR THE NEW STUDENT PROTECTIONS WOULD GO WITH REGARD TO PROPERTIES THAT MIGHT BE USING DV TODD VERSUS UNO, EVEN THOUGH THEY MIGHT BE USING, BEING USED BY STUDENTS.
SO AS PROPOSED THE ADDITIONS TO FOUR 18 WOULD APPLY ONLY TO UH, PARTICIPATION IN UNO.
SO THEN IF THOSE FOLKS WHO YOU ARE SAYING WOULD MAYBE TAKE ADVANTAGE OF DVE TAUGHT INSTEAD, THEY WOULD NOT HAVE THE SAME LEVEL OF STUDENT PROTECTIONS THAT WE ARE NOW TRYING TO BUILD INTO FOUR 18 BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT USING THE SAME BASE ZONING.
IS THAT CORRECT? OR OVERLAY I SHOULD SAY? UH, YES, THAT WOULD BE CORRECT.
ANY OTHER DENSITY BONUS, UH, THAT HAS FOUR 18, UH, OR HAS TO A ADHERE WITH FOUR 18 WOULD NOT HAVE THE NEW AMENDMENTS, UH, APPLY EVEN THOUGH WE MIGHT END UP WITH THE MAJORITY OF STUDENTS IN SOME OF THOSE BUILDINGS BECAUSE THEY ARE SO CLOSE TO CAMPUS? UH, YES.
I MEAN, AGAIN, A DISTINCTION WOULD BE THAT THOSE WOULD BE RENTED BY THE UNIT, WHICH IS A SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT, UM, YOU KNOW, KIND OF RENTAL TYPE.
AND THEN JUST TO REQUEST, 'CAUSE I DON'T THINK I'VE SEEN THIS, WOULD IT BE POSSIBLE TO HAVE A UNO MAP BEFORE OUR NEXT ONE? WE CONSIDER THIS, THAT ACTUALLY SHOWS WHERE THE DBE TODD OVERLAY GOES AS OPPOSED TO HOW IT INTERACTS WITH THE, UM, PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE MAP FOR THE UNO.
I THINK THAT THAT'S WHERE THERE'S BEEN SOME CONFUSION ABOUT HOW THOSE CORNERS ARE GONNA WORK AND WHERE THAT CIRCULAR, 'CAUSE I THINK IT'S A QUARTER MILE, A HALF A MILE FROM THE DIS FROM THE DISTANCE, IS THAT CORRECT? YEAH, HALF MILE BUFFER.
UM, THERE'S SUBDISTRICTS AT THE QUARTER MILE IS 120 FEET AND THEN 90 FEET FOR THE SECOND QUARTER MILE, UH, BUFFER.
BUT YES, WE COULD PROVIDE A MAP AND YOU'RE TALKING JUST TO CLARIFY UNO BOUNDARY OR PROPOSED BOUNDARY AND THEN E TODD OVERLAY, UH, OR BUFFER ADJACENT TO THAT.
YEAH, I THINK THAT WOULD BE GREAT.
OH, AND THEN ONE LAST QUESTION I DID HAVE, DO YOU ALL KNOW HAPPEN TO KNOW HOW MANY PEOPLE APPLIED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN THIS PAST YEAR? UM, WE, I DON'T HAVE, WE DON'T HAVE THE NUMBER UP.
UM, I WILL TELL YOU IT IS 90,000 PEOPLE, 90,000 STUDENTS.
WE'D LIKE TO BE COMING TO THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN.
AND OBVIOUSLY WE'RE NOT GONNA ADMIT THAT MANY, BUT MAKING SURE THAT WE HAVE ENOUGH HOUSING FOR EVERYBODY WHO'D LIKE TO COME TO OUR PREMIER CAMPUS WOULD BE REALLY GREAT.
UM, SEEING NO HANDS, UM, THIS WAS JUST A BRIEFING THIS EVENING.
SO PAUL AND ANNIE, THANK YOU PAUL.
AND UM, ALAN, THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR, UH, YOUR PRESENTATION AND ANSWERING QUESTIONS AND I THINK THIS IS A REALLY GOOD, UH, PRIMER FOR THE MEETING ON THE 22ND.
SO COMMISSIONERS, START THINKING ABOUT YOUR AMENDMENTS.
UM, YES, COMMISSIONER ER RAMIREZ.
ARE WE GONNA SEE AN ORDINANCE BEFORE THEN OR, OKAY THERE WE BE SOMETHING FOR US TO RESPOND TO BEYOND THE PRESENTATION? YES.
AND WILL THERE BE A WORKING GROUP? UM, IT WAS NOT POSTED FOR TONIGHT, SO THERE'S NO TIME FOR A WORKING GROUP, SO IT'LL BE INDIVIDUAL AMENDMENTS CHAIR.
SO YES, THERE WILL BE NOT BE A WORKING GROUP 'CAUSE WE'RE NOT POSTED FOR AND IT WAS JUST SORT OF TIME SENSITIVE OR REMINDER A SUB QUORUM OF COMMISSIONERS CAN ANYTIME GET TOGETHER AND WORK ON ANY ITEM.
JUST WE HAVE TO BE VERY CAREFUL THAT WE NEVER REACH QUORUM IN THOSE DISCUSSIONS, EVEN A WALKING QUORUM.
BUT FEEL FREE TO TALK TO YOUR COLLEAGUES.
UM, VICE CHAIR, PERHAPS YOU COULD SHARE WITH US HOW MANY PEOPLE THAT IS.
UM, THAT WOULD BE SIX PEOPLE ONLY, SO NO MORE THAN SIX FOLKS.
UM, IN ONE, I WILL SAY FIVE IS ALWAYS THE PREFERENCE.
UM, BUT SIX WORKS PARTICULARLY IF THE CHAIR IS THERE.
WE HAVE TO BE CAREFUL ABOUT OFFICERS THOUGH TOO.
SO THAT'LL DEPEND ON THE OUTCOMES OF OUR, UM, NEXT ITEM.
[12. Discussion and action on proposed amendments to City Code Title 25 (Land Development) that would increase the maximum square footage limits of two new housing units when the property owner preserves the existing housing unit. Presentation by Keith Mars, 512-466- 4598, keith.mars@austintexas.gov, Development Services Department.]
IS POSTPONED.UM, WE'LL HEAR THAT AT THE NEXT MEETING ABOUT THE PRESERVATION BONUS.
[13. Discussion and action to conduct officer elections for the Chair, Vice Chair, Parliamentarian, and Secretary.]
TO NUMBER 13.WE ARE GOING TO HOLD OFFICER ELECTIONS FOR CHAIR, VICE CHAIR, PARLIAMENTARIAN AND SECRETARY.
SO I'LL WALK YOU THROUGH THE PROCESS HERE.
[01:40:01]
STAY WITH ME AS I EXPLAIN THIS.I KNOW WE HAVE A NUMBER OF FOLKS THAT ARE NEW HERE THIS EVENING, BUT THE LAST MEETING I ASKED FOR NOMINATIONS OF INDIVIDUAL PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS FOR OFFICER POSITIONS.
AND SO I RECEIVED, UM, SEVERAL OF THOSE, UH, ONE EACH FOR CHAIR OF VICE CHAIR, UM, PARLIAMENTARIAN AND SECRETARY.
UM, I WILL OPEN THAT UP, UM, TO THE GROUP HERE IF ANYBODY ELSE WOULD LIKE TO NOMINATE.
UM, THE ONLY ASK IS THAT THE INDIVIDUAL WHO IS NOMINATED MUST ALSO ACCEPT THE NOMINATION.
SO, UM, JUST A LITTLE STEP THERE THAT I'LL ASK.
AND THEN ONCE ALL OF THE NOMINATIONS HAVE BEEN MADE, UM, THE COMMISSIONERS WILL EACH VOTE INDIVIDUALLY ON EACH NOMINEE AND WE'LL TAKE THOSE UP IN THE ORDER THAT THE NOMINATION WAS RECEIVED.
SO THOSE THAT I RECEIVED BY EMAIL WILL GO FIRST AND IF WE HEAR ANY OTHERS THIS EVENING, WE'LL TAKE THEM UP IN ORDER.
UM, SO THAT MEANS THAT I WILL GO AND ASK EACH INDIVIDUAL COMMISSIONER IF YOU'RE VOTING YAY OR NAY OR ABSTAINING ON THE VOTE FOR THE NOMINEE.
ONCE WE HIT SEVEN VOTES FOR THAT INDIVIDUAL, THAT PERSON IS, HAS WON THE NOMINATION.
UM, REMEMBER YOU'RE ONLY VOTING ONCE FOR A POSITION.
SO IF THERE WERE TWO NOMINEES FOR LET'S SAY CHAIR, YOU WOULD ONLY BE ABLE TO VOTE ONCE, UM, FOR THAT POSITION.
SO IS EVERYBODY CLEAR? WE'LL GO THROUGH THIS ONCE AND YOU'LL GET THE HANG OF IT, I PROMISE.
MIGHT I SUGGEST MAYBE READING OFF THE CURRENT NOMINATIONS AND THEN SEEING IF THERE ARE OTHER NOMINATIONS AND IF THERE ISN'T THAT THE CHAIR MAKE A, UM, VOTE OR TAKE A VOTE OF AFFIRMATION OR ACCLIMATION THE GROUP VOTE.
SO WE CAN JUST GET IT OVER WITH? YES.
YEAH, I JUST WANTED TO LAY THE GROUND RULES BECAUSE IT WAS A LITTLE SPICY LAST TIME.
UM, THE ORDER THAT WE'LL TAKE, THESE ARE, UM, STRATEGIC SO THAT A CHAIR, A, A SEAT IS VACATED AS WE GO THROUGH THERE, BUT WE'LL VOTE FIRST ON CHAIR AND THEN VICE CHAIR AND THEN SECRETARY, AND THEN PARLIAMENTARIAN.
SO THE NOMINATIONS THAT I HAVE RECEIVED FOR CHAIR, UM, WAS COMING FROM COMMISSIONER ANDERSON.
WE HAVE, UH, THE NOMINATION OF VICE CHAIRS ARE FOR CHAIR.
ARE THERE ANY OTHER NOMINATIONS? OKAY, LET ME GO THROUGH THE OTHER NOMINATIONS AND WE'LL SEE IF ANYBODY WANTS TO ADD A NAME TO THE LIST HERE.
SO VICE CHAIR OF THE NOMINEE IS MADE BY COMMISSIONER MAXWELL FOR COMMISSIONER WOODS TO BECOME VICE CHAIR FOR SECRETARY.
UM, THE NOMINATION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WOODS TO HAVE COMMISSIONER ANDERSON REMAIN AS SECRETARY AND FOR PARLIAMENTARIAN.
THE NOMINATION WAS MADE BY VICE CHAIR AZAR FOR COMMISSIONER HANEY TO BECOME PARLIAMENTARIAN.
ARE THERE ANY OTHER NOMINEES? SURE.
I WOULD LIKE TO NOMINATE COMMISSIONER FELICITY MAXWELL FOR SECRETARY.
AND I WOULD LIKE, SO I BELIEVE THE OTHERS CAN GO ON AFFIRMATION.
I THINK I NEED TO ACCEPT THAT NOMINATION BEFORE WE CAN MOVE FORWARD.
DO YOU ACCEPT THAT NOMINATION? I'M NOT.
UM, WELL THAT LEAVES COMMISSIONER MAXWELL AS OUR ONLY NOMINEE FOR SECRETARY AND COMMISSIONER MAXWELL.
DO YOU ACCEPT THAT NOMINATION? I DO.
OKAY, SO JUST TO REPEAT, UM, I'LL ASK IF NO OBJECTION TO THE LIST THAT I'M READING, THEN THAT MOTION PASSES CHAIR.
WE SHOULD MAKE A MOTION AND THEN WE CAN GO THROUGH AFFIRMATION CHAIR.
I MOVE TO MAKE COMMISSIONER ZA CHAIR, COMMISSIONER WOODS, VICE-CHAIR COMMISSIONER MAXWELL SECRETARY, COMMISSIONER HANNEY PARLIAMENTARIAN, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SKIDMORE.
THAT WENT MUCH MORE SMOOTHLY THAN LAST YEAR.
CHAIR, CHAIR, CAN I HAVE A MOMENT PLEASE? YES, SURE.
I'LL START WITH YOU FIRST, BUT I DO DO WANNA THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICES CHAIR.
[01:45:01]
I'M ABOUT TO STEP INTO THE SHOES AND IT'S, IT CAN BE A HARD JOB SOMETIMES AND I THINK PARTICULARLY YOU HAVE HELPED US GET THROUGH TIMES WHEN THE VOLUME OF WORK HAS BEEN REALLY HIGH.I THINK IN THE LAST FEW YEARS WE'VE ACHIEVED A ACCOMPLISHED A LOT AS A BODY AND SO AS A CITY AS A WHOLE.
AND I OF COURSE WANNA THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE, NOT ONLY ON THE COMMISSION, BUT ALSO AS CHAIR, UM, GUIDING US THROUGH ALL OF THAT.
NOT TO MENTION YOUR YEARS OF SORT OF LEADING IT THROUGH SO MANY DIFFERENT PIECES.
AND AT THE SAME TIME, I ALSO WANNA THANK, UH, COMMISSIONER ANDERSON FOR SER SERVING AS SECRETARY FOR A VERY LONG TIME AS WELL.
I CANNOT EVEN REMEMBER, BUT I FEEL LIKE YOU'VE BEEN IN THAT POSITION FOR A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF TIME.
UM, SO AGAIN, THANK YOU BOTH FOR YOUR SERVICE IN THOSE ROLES.
I KNOW SOMETIMES THE OFFICER POSITIONS CAN BE LIKE AN EXTRA THING, BUT IT HELPS, UH, US MOVE FORWARD AS A BODY.
WELL, I FEEL REALLY EXCELLENT THAT THE LEADERSHIP IS GOING TO CONTINUE IN A REALLY GOOD EVEN BETTER MANNER.
SO I KNOW YOU'RE GIVING AN EXCELLENT CHAIR,
UM, I DID WANT TO JUST SAY THANK YOU IF I COULD, AND THEN WE'LL GO INTO OUR WORKING GROUP UPDATES.
BUT, UM, I, I WROTE SOME THINGS DOWN BECAUSE I DIDN'T WANNA FORGET ANYTHING.
BUT, UM, I JUST WANNA SAY IT'S BEEN A REALLY SURREAL TO BE HERE LOOKING BACK ON SIX YEARS OF SERVICE WHEN I FIRST GOT INVOLVED WITH, UM, IF YOU KNOW, THE EAST SIDE, THE RBJ REDEVELOPMENT.
AS A CONSULTANT, I THOUGHT I HAD A PRETTY DECENT GRASP ON ZONING.
UM, BUT DIVING INTO AUSTIN'S ZONING COMPLEXITIES WAS A TOTALLY DIFFERENT LEVEL.
UM, BEING HERE ON THE COMMISSION, UM, IN 2019, I JOINED LEADERSHIP AUSTIN WITH A 2-YEAR-OLD DAUGHTER AT HOME.
AND I MENTIONED THAT BECAUSE I KNOW A LOT OF PEOPLE WONDER HOW CAN YOU BALANCE THIS WITH PARENTING AND ANOTHER JOB.
UM, I'M A PRINCIPAL OF A DESIGN FIRM AND I JUST WANNA SAY THAT IF THERE'S ANYBODY LISTENING TO THIS, THAT YES, YOU ABSOLUTELY CAN, UM, IT TAKES A VILLAGE FOR SURE.
UM, BUT IT'S ABSOLUTELY WORTH IT.
AND, UM, WHEN I JOINED THE PLANNING COMMISSION IN 2019, I JUMPED RIGHT INTO THE DEEP END.
THIS WAS ON THE DEMISE OF CODE NEXT.
UM, THE, THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE REWRITE WAS IN FULL SWING AND I GOT TO JOIN THE PARTY RIGHT WHEN WE WERE THERE.
UM, I GOT INVOLVED IN WORKING GROUPS, PARTICULARLY THE DOWNTOWN WORKING GROUP.
I POURED OVER AMENDMENTS AND HELPED SHAPE THE FINAL PACKAGE OF RECOMMENDATIONS THAT MADE IT ALL THE WAY TO COUNCIL BEFORE COVID I AND THE LAWSUIT PAUSED THE MOMENTUM.
SO THROUGHOUT THIS EXPERIENCE OF BEING ON PLANNING COMMISSION, I HAVE LEARNED SO MUCH.
I TELL PEOPLE THIS HAS BEEN LIKE GETTING ANOTHER GRADUATE DEGREE, UM, AND I'M STILL LEARNING EVEN TONIGHT.
SO I LEARNED ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE AND THE MESSINESS OF COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT.
YOU CAN'T DO TRUE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT WITHOUT IT BEING MESSY.
UM, I LEARNED HOW TO TRULY LISTEN TO BOTH SIDES OF AN ISSUE.
AND I LEARNED THAT EVERYTHING IS NOT BLACK AND WHITE AND THAT SOMETIMES YOU HAVE TO GROW WITH THICKER SKIN.
AND SO SIX YEARS
UM, BUT MORE THAN ANYTHING I'VE LEARNED THAT GOOD PLANNING IS ABOUT PEOPLE.
AND I'M PROUD OF THE PROJECTS THAT WE'VE HELPED MOVE FORWARD OVER THESE PAST SIX YEARS.
DEVELOPMENTS LIKE THE LAUREN HOTEL, WHICH WAS THE TACO OF COBANA BEFORE THE VERANDA APARTMENTS ON TWO 90 EAST, THAT WAS INDUSTRIALLY ZONED, UM, PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING IN THE HANCOCK NEIGHBORHOOD.
UM, THOSE WERE REALLY HEATED MEETINGS HERE.
UM, INCREASED DENSITY ALONG SOUTH LAMAR AS WE GET MORE TRANSIT THERE AND THE BRODY OAKS REDEVELOPMENT.
AND I'M REALLY EXCITED TO SEE COME TO FRUITION AT SOME POINT.
THESE ARE PROJECTS THAT REFLECT YEARS OF EFFORT FROM THIS BODY, FROM COUNCIL, FROM ALL OF THE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS THAT REVIEW IT AND STAFF.
UM, SO I, IT'S A LOT OF EFFORT, IT'S A LOT OF COMPROMISE AND IT'S A LOT OF COM COLLABORATION.
AND I ALSO WANT TO MENTION HOW MY WORK AS A COMMISSIONER HAS SHAPED MY WORK AS A CONSULTANT FOR CITIES.
SO IF YOU DIDN'T KNOW, I'M A PLANNER AND A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND MOST OF MY WORK IS NOT IN AUSTIN.
I WORK IN A LOT OF SMALLER, MID-SIZE, LARGER CITIES ACROSS THE COUNTRY.
AND ALL OF THE WORK, THE CONVERSATIONS, THE DISCUSSIONS, THE HARD LONG NIGHTS THAT WE'VE HAD HERE IS DOING NOTHING BUT HELPING ADVANCE THE WORK THAT I BRING TO OTHER CITIES.
AND SO I THANK EVERYBODY FOR THAT.
OF COURSE, NONE OF THIS WOULD BEEN POSSIBLE WITHOUT THE SUPPORT OF SO MANY PEOPLE TO CITY STAFF THAT ARE HERE THIS EVENING, ESPECIALLY JOY.
ERIC, ELLA, DESTINY, I THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR ALL OF THE COLLABORATION.
YOU'RE KEEPING US ON THE RIGHT TRACK.
I KNOW THE HOURS THAT YOU WORK AND THE CONVERSATIONS THAT YOU HAVE.
WE COULDN'T DO THIS WITHOUT YOU.
SO I REALLY, REALLY THANK YOU TO MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS, ESPECIALLY THOSE THAT I'VE SERVED WITH FOR SO LONG.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME, YOUR ENERGY AND THE
[01:50:01]
SACRIFICES YOU'VE MADE AWAY FROM YOUR FAMILIES, YOUR DOGS, YOUR FRIENDS, WEEK AFTER WEEK.AND I'VE LEARNED SO MUCH FROM YOUR DIVERSE PERSPECTIVES AND DEEP COMMITMENT AND TO MY JOB, THANK YOU FOR MY FLEXIBILITY AND UNDERSTANDING, UM, ESPECIALLY DURING THESE SPECIAL CALLED MEETINGS THAT HAPPEN, UM, ON A TYPICAL WORK DAY AND ESPECIALLY TO MY FAMILY.
UM, THAT'S THE REASON I'M HERE.
I THINK MY MOM WHO HAS OFTEN STEPPED IN TO WATCH MY DAUGHTER CHLOE, WHEN I'M HERE AND MY HUSBAND IS ON DUTY, UM, STAYING UP WELL BEYOND HER BEDTIME, UM, TO MY HUSBAND WHO'S LISTENED, ENCOURAGED AND SUPPORTED ME THROUGH ALL OF THE UPS AND DOWNS.
HE'S KIND OF LIKE, UH, A VARSITY COMMISSIONER AT THIS POINT,
WE'RE CELEBRATING LATER, UH, THIS WEEK.
BUT PLANNING COMMISSIONS DON'T STOP FOR BIRTHDAYS.
AND FINALLY, JUST A SMALL CALL TO ACTION FOR US FOR THIS BODY.
IT'S TO THINK OUTSIDE OF THE BINARY.
UM, THE WORLD ISN'T BLACK AND WHITE AND PLANNING COMMISSIONERS DO THE BEST WORK WHEN WE CAN HELP FIND COMPROMISE BETWEEN PARTIES AND LET'S NOT GET STUCK IN THE PAST.
LET'S LOOK TO A BETTER FUTURE.
ONE THAT MIGHT LOOK DIFFERENT FOR EACH OF US, BUT THERE IS PLENTY OF ROOM FOR ALIGNMENT.
AND I'LL STOP THIS LONG DIATRIBE BY SAYING THAT MY DAUGHTER, CHLOE, WHO IS NOW ALMOST EIGHT, SHE WAS TWO WHEN I STARTED AND IS NOW A SECOND GRADER, SHE'S PROBABLY THE MOST EXCITED THAT AT LEAST FOR NOW MOM IS GOING TO BE HOME AT A NORMAL TIME ON TUESDAYS.
SO THIS IS NOT, THIS IS MAY BE THE END OF MY TIME ON THE COMMISSION, BUT IT'S NOT THE END OF MY INVOLVEMENT AND I LOOK FORWARD TO STAYING ACTIVE IN MY PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS LIKE A PA AND A SLA.
AND HOPEFULLY I'LL HAVE THE CHANCE TO WORK WITH MANY OF YOU AGAIN.
THANK YOU FOR BEARING WITH THAT
I'M GONNA, NOT TO HONESTLY KEEP ON TALKING AND SAYING THANK YOU TO YOU ALL, BUT IT'S ONE OF THOSE NIGHTS I HONESTLY, I, I DO WANNA THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE.
SIX YEARS IS A LOT AND I THINK YOU HAVE BEEN AN AMAZING COMPANION.
ONE THING I THINK YOU DID NOT MENTION IS WHEN YOU WERE GETTING ON THE COMMISSION, WE HAD A VERY MALE HEAVY COMMISSION UNTIL YOU BECAME CHAIR.
WE HAD NOT HAD A FEMALE CHAIR IN THE ENTIRE TIME I HAD BEEN THERE.
AND I THINK YOU REALLY BROUGHT THAT BALANCE OF NOT JUST OF COURSE YOUR OPINIONS AND EVERYTHING, BUT ALSO THAT LENS OF BEING A WOMAN AND BEING A MOTHER DO THE WORK THAT WE DO.
AND I THINK THAT HAS BEEN VERY MEANINGFUL IN GUIDING US ALL THROUGH THOSE YEARS.
NOT TO MENTION I FEEL LIKE THE WORK THAT YOU DID, NOT JUST ON SURF, LIKE WORKING ON DOWNTIME BUT YOU KNOW, WORKING ON LANDSCAPING AND PARKLAND AND ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES YOU HAVE REALLY LED AND I THINK WE'RE GONNA BE BEREFT A LITTLE BIT WITHOUT YOUR KNOWLEDGE ON A LOT OF THOSE ITEMS. AND UM, JUST THE LAST THING I'LL SAY IS I FEEL LIKE, NOT TO SOUND TOO SAPPY, BUT IT IS ONE OF THOSE THINGS THAT YOU SERVE SO LONG WITH FOLKS.
PLANNING COMMISSION DOES START FEELING LIKE A FAMILY.
IT DEFINITELY DURING THE CODE TIMES I FELT LIKE I SPENT MORE TIME WITH YOU ALL THAN I DID WITH MY OWN FAMILY AND FRIENDS.
SO JUST HAVING THAT CAMARADERIE THAT WE HAVE, I AGREE IT LIVES FOREVER.
THERE'S SO MANY COMMISSIONERS WHO HAVE LEFT OVER THE YEARS AND WE STILL KEEP UP WITH THEM AND IT'S ALWAYS GREAT TO HEAR AND I KNOW LIKE ALL OF THEM WHO'VE COME BEFORE YOU, YOU'RE GONNA GO ON AND DO THE AMAZING WORK THAT YOU DO.
NOT JUST IN YOUR PROFESSIONAL LIFE BUT IN YOUR COMMUNITY.
I KNOW THAT COMMITMENT OF YOURS WILL LIVE ON REGARDLESS YOU SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION OR NOT.
ALRIGHT, WELL ENOUGH WITH THAT, UM, WE'LL MOVE ON TO
[WORKING GROUP/COMMITTEE UPDATES]
THE WORKING GROUP AND COMMITTEE UPDATES.UM, AND THEN, UH, JUST KNOW THAT UM, THERE'S GOING TO BE A CALL FOR DIFFERENT COMMITTEES AND WORKING GROUPS YOU MAY WANT TO SERVE ON.
SO NEW COMMISSIONERS, ACTUALLY ALL OF OUR COMMISSIONERS, THERE'S GONNA BE A BIG SHUFFLE.
SO MAYBE PINPOINT ONE OR TWO THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO SERVE ON.
UM, WE'LL START WITH CODES AND ORDINANCES, JOINT COMMITTEE.
THAT MEETING IS HAPPENING NEXT WEDNESDAY.
UM, COMMISSION OR, UH, SORRY, NUMBER 15, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN JOINT COMMITTEE.
I DON'T THINK WE HAVE ANYBODY ON ANYMORE THAT'S, UH, SERVING ON THAT CION COMMITTEE.
UM, THE JOINT SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE, WE HAVE NO UPDATES.
OKAY, NUMBER 17, SMALL AREA PLANNING JOINT COMMITTEE.
WE HAVE A MEETING OF SMALL AREA PLANNING JOINT COMMITTEE TOMORROW MORNING AT 1130.
UM, NUMBER 18, SOUTH CENTRAL WATERFRONT ADVISORY BOARD.
NUMBER 19, CITY OF AUSTIN BUILDINGS WORKING GROUP, WE UH, OH, SORRY, THAT'S, THAT'S WHEN THAT WE NEED TO SUNSET.
YES, WE'LL WORK WITH STAFF TO MAKE SURE THAT WE GET THAT DONE.
UM, THE OUTREACH AND PROCEDURES WORKING GROUP NUMBER 20, UM, CHAIRS SIMILAR.
UM, THAT ONE, UH, IF YOU MIND, THERE'S NOBODY SERVING ON IT AT THE MOMENT.
THAT IS ALSO ONE THAT'S, WE'RE GONNA BE DISSOLVING.
NUMBER 21, THE GOVERNANCE RULES
[01:55:01]
AND PROCEDURES WORKING GROUP CHAIR.WE MET YESTERDAY AND WE'LL BE HAVING ANOTHER MEETING BEFORE BRINGING OUR WORK TO COMMISSION.
SORRY, I'M LOOKING AT MY NOTES IN MAY.
ALRIGHT, AND FINALLY NUMBER 22 E, UH, THE ETOD AND VISION PLANS WORKING GROUP.
YES, WE HAVE HAD THREE MEETINGS FOR THIS WORKING GROUP AND I WANNA KIND OF GET THE TEMPERATURE OF UM, WE HAVE A VERY LONG MEETING AT OUR NEXT MEETING AND IF FOLKS ARE OPEN TO IT, I WOULD LOVE TO RUN BRIEFLY THROUGH OUR PROPOSED AMENDMENT SO FAR SO THAT WE CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THEM NOW AS PART OF A WORKING GROUP UPDATE AND POTENTIALLY MOVE THOSE ALL THROUGH A LITTLE BIT MORE QUICKLY AT OUR NEXT MEETING.
APPRECIATE EVERYONE BEARING WITH ME ON THIS.
YOU SHOULD HAVE RECEIVED AN EMAILED SHEET OF AMENDMENTS FROM LR STAFF LIAISON.
UM, IF ANYONE DID NOT, PLEASE SHOOT ELLA AN EMAIL AND SHE CAN SEND IT TO YOU.
UM, BUT I'M JUST GONNA WALK THROUGH THEM VERY QUICKLY AND IF ANY OF THE OTHER WORKING GROUP MEMBERS WANT TO CHIME IN, UM, ON ANY OF THE AMENDMENTS, PLEASE FEEL FREE.
AND IF FOLKS HAVE QUESTIONS, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO JUMP IN.
UM, SO THE FIRST AMENDMENT IS TO THE NORTH LAMAR STATION AREA VISION PLAN.
THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT IS TO EXPAND THE NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSITION ZONE IN THE PLUM TO INCLUDE THE REMAINING SITES WITHIN THE NORTH LAMAR TRANSIT CENTER HALF MILE BOUNDARY, EXCLUDING OPEN SPACE EXISTING LAND USE.
WE ALSO WANNA NOTE THAT PER STAFF THIS WOULD TRIGGER RE THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS ALSO RELATED TO THE NORTH LAMAR STATIONARY VISION PLAN.
THE AMENDMENT IS TO FACILITATE ACCESS TO THE NORTH LAMAR TRANSIT CENTER WITH IMPROVED CONNECTIVITY FROM THE TRANSIT CENTER NORTHBOUND TO POWELL LANE EXTENSION AND EASTBOUND ACROSS NORTH LAMAR WITH A SEPARATE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ALIGNING WITH PROPOSED AUSTIN LIGHT RAIL PLANS.
AND I GUESS I'LL JUST NOTE THAT YOU KNOW, EVERYONE CAN READ THIS ON THEIR OWN.
SO REALLY IF WHAT'S USEFUL HERE IS IF FOLKS HAVE QUESTIONS, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO JUMP IN ON ANY OF THESE.
THE THIRD AMENDMENT APPLIES TO BOTH THE NORTH LAMAR AND SOUTH CONGRESS STATION AREA VISION PLANS.
THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT IS TO REQUEST THAT STAFF PROVIDE AN UPDATE WITHIN SIX MONTHS TO SHARE NEXT STEPS TO BRING BASE ZONES WITHIN ETOD INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE VISION PLANS.
THE FOURTH AMENDMENT ALSO APPLIES TO BOTH STATIONARY VISION PLANS.
THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT IS TO PROHIBIT NEW AUTO ORIENTED USES CONSISTENT WITH THE USES PROHIBITED WITHIN D-B-E-T-O-D WITHIN THESE TWO ETOD AREAS.
AMENDMENT FIVE IS JUST FOR THE SOUTH CONGRESS STATIONARY VISION PLAN.
THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT IS TO EXPAND THE TOD MIXED USE IN THE PLUM EAST AND WEST ALONG BOTH SIDES OF US.
TWO 90 TO THE EDGE OF THE SOUTH CONGRESS TRANSIT CENTER HALF MILE BOUNDARY, EXCEPT WHERE DOING SO WOULD REDUCE EXISTING ALLOWABLE DENSITY.
ALSO WANNA NOTE THAT PER STAFF THIS WOULD ALSO TRIGGER RE NOTICING.
NUMBER SIX IS JUST TO THE SOUTH CONGRESS STATIONARY VISION PLAN, UH, ON THE PLUM TO EXPAND THE NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSITION ZONE TO INCLUDE REMAINING SITES WITHIN THE TRANS, UH, WITHIN THE TRANSIT CENTER HALF MILE BOUNDARY EXCLUDING OPEN SPACE EXISTING LAND USE.
AND THOSE RECOMMENDED FOR TOD MIXED USE IN AMENDMENT FIVE.
THIS WOULD ALSO TRIGGER RE NOTICING PER STAFF.
AND FINALLY, NUMBER SEVEN, UH, THE AMENDMENT IS TO IDENTIFY ADDITIONAL EAST, WEST AND NORTH SOUTH MULTIMODAL CONNECTIONS WITHIN THE SOUTH CONGRESS STATION AREA AND BETWEEN SURROUNDING AREAS, FOR EXAMPLE, BETWEEN ALPINE ROAD AND WAREHOUSE ROW.
AND THIS WOULD NOT TRIGGER RE NOTICING CHAIR.
COMMISSIONER MAXWELL? UM, YES.
CAN YOU EXPLAIN WHAT STAFF'S COMMENTS WERE REGARDING THE REIFICATION MR. WOODS? I CAN, SO WE, WE PROPOSED AS PART OF THE WORKING GROUP, EXPANDING SOME OF THE PH FLUM CHANGES TO THE EDGE OF THAT HALF MILE BOUNDARY.
AND BECAUSE OF THE DIS BECAUSE OF THE PROPERTIES THAT WERE NOTICED ORIGINALLY ASSOCIATED WITH THE PHLEGM CHANGES THAT DON'T FILL THAT WHOLE HALF MILE BOUNDARY, UM, WE WOULD NEED TO RE-NOTICE ANY PROPERTIES THAT WOULD BE ASSOCIATED WITH THAT ADDITIONAL PH FLUM CHANGE EVEN WITHIN THAT HALF MILE BOUNDARY.
I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO KNOW.
AND JUST TO CLARIFY, IF WE PROPOSE THAT CHANGE, WE WOULD THEN NEED THEM TO RE NOTIFY AND BRING BACK THE AMENDMENTS AGAIN, LIKE WE CAN'T RE NOTIFY AND THEN JUST HAVE IT GO STRAIGHT TO COUNCIL.
DOES THAT MEAN THAT THEY HAVE AN ADDITIONAL PERIOD TO COMMENT FOR THOSE IN THE COMMUNITY? YES, THEY WOULD.
FOR A PERIOD OF HOW LONG? NOT SURE OUR STAFF PEOPLE DO TELL THERE'S A NOTICE PERIOD.
UM, I I WILL SAY HONESTLY THERE'S THIS IS, THERE'S IS TWO PIECES.
THE BODY CAN DECIDE TO MOVE AHEAD WITH A GENERAL RECOMMENDATION THAT ESSENTIALLY GIVES A SIGNAL TO COUNCIL, THIS IS SORT OF WHERE WE WANNA HEAD.
AND IN ADDITION IF WE WANTED WE WOULD BE TALKING
[02:00:01]
ABOUT RE NOTICING.UM, AND OF COURSE THERE'S A DIRE PROCEDURE ASSOCIATED WITH THAT AND COST ASSOCIATED WITH THAT.
SORRY, I'M STUCK ON THIS ISSUE TOO.
FURTHER RE NOTICING AND BECAUSE IT'S IMPORTANT.
SO THEN WOULD THAT BE RE NOTICING THE, JUST THE FLU AMENDMENTS? RIGHT.
'CAUSE THERE'S TWO ITEMS RIGHT.
AND WOULD IT ALSO JUST BE RE NOTICING THOSE ADDITIONAL AREAS AS OPPOSED TO STARTING OVER? MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT IT WOULD JUST BE RE NOTICING THE ADDITIONAL AREAS FOR THE FL AMENDMENTS AND THAT WOULD BE A SEPARATE ACTION FOR BOTH PLANNING COMMISSION AND COUNCIL.
SORRY, WE'RE JUST GONNA GO DOWN AFL AMENDMENT SITUATION HERE.
ARE THERE PARTS OF THE AMENDMENTS THAT WE COULD GO AHEAD AND APPROVE AND THEN JUST LEAVE THE REST OF YOU RE NOTIFIED? ABSOLUTELY.
AND WE COULD ALSO, AS VICE CHAIR AZAR SAID, CHANGE THESE GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS THAT WOULD NOT NECESSARILY REQUIRE NOTICING, BUT MAKE CLEAR OUR INTENT TO COUNSEL TO INCLUDE MORE PROPERTIES WITHIN THAT HALF MILE BOUNDARY IN THE FUTURE.
I KNOW THAT WE HAD A LOT OF PUBLIC COMMENT REGARDING THOSE FLAME CHANGES.
DO WE HAVE A SENSE THAT THIS EXPANDED BOUNDARY HAS BEEN MAYBE POTENTIALLY SPOKEN TO AT THOSE NEW COMMUNITY MEETINGS? OR DO WE KNOW IF STAFF IS DISCUSSING THAT AT ALL? MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THE BOUND, WELL I THINK FROM THE CONVERSATION THAT WE HAD WITH STAFF AT A PREVIOUS MEETING, THOSE BOUNDARIES WERE DRAWN AS A RESULT OF PUBLIC COMMENT.
ALRIGHT, OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY, WELL WE'LL MOVE ON TO, UM, THANK YOU.
THANK YOU YOU FOR LETTING ME GO THROUGH THE EXERCISE.
[FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS]
MEASURE.UM, JERRY, JUST TO SORT OF PUT IN OUR RADAR, UM, I'LL MAKE A MOTION, YOU CAN SECOND IT ESSENTIALLY TO HAVE, UM, ALL OF OUR APPOINTMENTS TO THE VARIOUS DIFFERENT JOINT COMMITTEES AND WORKING GROUPS AND WE'LL WORK WITH STAFF TO SEND OUT A CHART OF, UH, AVAILABLE SEATS PER BODY AS WELL.
THAT MIGHT TAKE US A LITTLE WHILE, BUT WE'LL TRY OUR BEST TO GET THAT TO EVERYBODY.
AND THAT'S, UM, I, I DON'T KNOW WHERE COUNCIL IS ON THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS FOR REALLOCATING NARROWING DOWN.
SO WE'LL JUST HAVE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THESE COMMITTEES AS IS.
AND THEN A QUICK REMINDER TO COMMISSIONERS THAT FOR, UH, FOR THE JOINT COMMITTEES, NOT THE WORKING, THE WORKING GROUPS, ONCE YOU'RE ON THEM, YOU CAN START SERVING IMMEDIATELY FOR THE JOINT COMMITTEES, IT HAS TO GO THROUGH THE PROCESS AND YOU WILL STILL HAVE TO DO YOUR OATH.
SO YOU CANNOT SERVE IMMEDIATELY.
IT TAKES A LITTLE BIT OF TIME TO GO THROUGH THAT PROCESS.
NOW YOU, I KNOW Y'ALL JUST DID THAT FOR A COMMISSION.
ARE THERE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS? CHAIR? JUST A QUICK QUESTION.
DID I HEAR FROM TONIGHT'S PRESENTATION THAT WE, WE'D ALSO BE TAKING UP UNO AMENDMENTS POTENTIALLY ON APRIL 22ND? YES.
SO BOTH CODE AMENDMENTS ARE THEORETICALLY GOING TO BE ON OUR NEXT AGENDA, THE PRESERVATION BONUS, THE UNO, WHAT ELSE? RIGHT.
AND THE VISION PLANS, AND I, AND I WILL BE HONEST FOR BOTH PRES, I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S A TIMELINE ALREADY IDENTIFIED FOR THE VISION PLANS, BUT CERTAINLY FOR BOTH THE PRESERVATION BONUS AND UNO DATES CERTAIN THEY'RE GOING TO COUNSEL.
SO WE HA WE CAN OF COURSE AS A BODY DECIDE NOT TO SEND A RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL AND PAUSE THE WORK THAT'S ON US.
BUT PARTICULARLY FOR THE PRESERVATION BONUS, I WOULD SAY THERE'S ALREADY POSTCARDS HAVE GONE OUT.
WE WOULD BE, WE HAVE TO BE ABLE TO FORWARD IT TO COUNCIL SO THAT WE CAN STILL MEET THOSE DEADLINES.
IF NO OTHER FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS, UM, THIS MEETING IS ADJOURNED AT 8:08 PM THANK YOU.