Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript


[CALL TO ORDER]

[00:00:05]

EVERYONE.

MY NAME IS STEVEN APODACA, UH, CHAIR OF THE TECHNOLOGY, UH, COMMISSION.

I AM CALLING.

OUR MEETING TO ORDER.

TODAY IS WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 10TH, UH, 2025.

I HAVE THE TIME AT 6 37.

WE ARE COMING TO YOU, UH, FROM THE, UH, BOARDS OF COMMISSIONS ROOM IN CITY HALL.

UH, ALTHOUGH SOME MEMBERS OF OUR, UH, COMMISSION MIGHT BE PARTICIP VIA VIDEO CONFERENCE, UH, WE'LL START WITH THE ROLL CALL.

ONCE AGAIN, MY NAME IS STEVEN AKIN.

I'M REPRESENTING DISTRICT TWO.

UH, WE'LL START THE, WITH THE FOLKS IN THE ROOM STARTING TO MY LEFT.

GO AHEAD.

UH, THIS IS COMMISSIONER CUBY REPRESENTING DISTRICT SEVEN REVI, REPRESENTING DISTRICT 10, COMMISSIONER EASTWOOD REPRESENTING DISTRICT EIGHT.

AND, UH, WE'LL JUST GO IN ORDER IN WHICH I SEE YOU ON THE SCREEN.

COMMISSIONER, HERITAGE COMMISSIONER HERITAGE REPRESENTING DISTRICT FOUR AND COMMISSIONER RICE.

COMMISSIONER RICE REPRESENTING DISTRICT FIVE.

OKAY, SO WE HAVE A QUORUM, UH, AND I BELIEVE OUR VICE CHAIR WILL BE BACK SHORTLY.

UM, BUT JUST TO WALK THE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC THROUGH OUR AGENDA.

UH, CURRENTLY WE DON'T HAVE ANYONE SIGNED UP FOR PUBLIC COMMUNICATION.

I'M GONNA SKIP AROUND IN OUR AGENDA.

UM, SO, UH, I'M GONNA ACTUALLY START WITH AGENDA ITEM NUMBER TWO.

WE HAVE A FEW MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC HERE, UH, TO ADDRESS US ON, UH, COMMUNITY IMPACT OF THE TECHNOLOGY COMMISSION.

UH, THEN WE'LL MOVE TO AGENDA ITEM THREE, UM, OR EXCUSE ME, AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FOUR, UH, TO REVIEW A RECOMMENDATION FROM ONE OF OUR WORKING GROUPS.

AND THEN WE'LL SKIP BACK TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER THREE.

SO IF THAT ITEM DOES PASS, WE'LL HAVE SOME REVISIONS TO MAKE TO OUR REPORT OUT TO THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE.

AFTER THAT, WE'LL MOVE INTO THE WORKING GROUP UPDATES, UH, FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS, AND, UM, APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES.

[2. Hold a public hearing to solicit feedback from the public and community stakeholders regarding the usefulness and relevance of the Technology Commission stated purposes and duties and its success in fulfilling those purpose and duties.]

SO WITH THAT, I'LL MOVE US TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER TWO.

UM, SO THAT IS THE, UH, PUBLIC HEARING TO SOLICIT FEEDBACK FROM THE COMMUNITY.

AND WE HAVE SOME MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC HERE, UM, SOME FORMER COMMISSIONERS AND FRIENDS OF THE COMMISSION.

SO I'LL GO AHEAD AND TURN IT OVER TO MALCOLM YATES.

UH, FIRST, UH, TO ADDRESS THE, UH, COMMISSION ON THE, UH, THE SUN SETTING, UH, PILOT PROGRAM, UH, THAT THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE WILL BE REPORTING OUT TO, UH, THE AUDIT AND FINANCE COMMITTEE, UH, ON AN OCTOBER.

OVER TO YOU, MALCOLM.

NO, THERE WE GO.

THERE WE GO.

MY NAME IS MALCOLM YATES.

I HAVE BEEN A CITIZEN OF AUSTIN FOR OVER 40 YEARS.

I WORKED IN THE CITY OF AUSTIN, TELE COMMUNICATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT FOR 20 YEARS.

AFTER I RETIRED IN 2014, I SERVED ON THIS COMMISSION FOR EIGHT YEARS.

AT THAT TIME, THIS COMMISSION WAS CALLED THE COMMUNITY TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION.

I'M HERE TODAY TO DOCUMENT THE IMPORTANCE OF THIS COMMISSION.

THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WAS ORIGINALLY FORMED TO PROVIDE CITIZEN OVERSIGHT OF THE CABLE TELEVISION NETWORK.

FRANCHISE STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATION REDUCED THE AUTHORITY OF CITIES TO REGULATE TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANIES.

THE NAME OF THIS COMMISSION WAS THEN CHANGED TO THE COMMUNITY TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION TO REFLECT THE CHANGE IN FOCUS OF THIS COMMISSION.

THIS COMMISSION PERFORMS A VITAL FUNCTION.

THIS FUNCTION IS CITIZEN OVERSIGHT OF THE INFORMATION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSETS OF THE CITY.

EVERY CITY UTILITY DEPARTMENT HAS A CITIZEN OVERSIGHT BOARD, AUSTIN WATER, AUSTIN ELECTRIC, AND THE AIRPORT.

30 YEARS AGO, THE INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEPARTMENT DID NOT PROVIDE SERVICES DIRECTLY TO CITIZENS.

THE INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEPARTMENT PROVIDED SERVICES TO OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS THAT CHANGED WITH THE INTERNET.

WHERE ARE WE HERE? TRY IT AGAIN.

YEAH.

CITY INFORMATION IS NOW PROVIDED ONLINE TO CITIZENS CITIZEN REQUEST SERVICES ON THE CITY.

WEBSITE.

COMPANIES USED

[00:05:01]

THE CITY WEBSITE TO CONDUCT BUSINESS WITH THE CITY.

WHAT ALSO CHANGED 30 YEARS AGO WAS THAT THE CITY BECAME A TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK PROVIDER.

THE GREATER AUSTIN AREA TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK HAS OVER 350 MILES OF MULTIS STRAND FIBER OPTIC CABLE CONNECTING OVER 500 BUILDINGS BELONGING TO SEVEN DIFFERENT GOVERNMENT AGENCIES.

THESE ARE ONLY A FEW EXAMPLES OF THE INFORMATION AND TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES PROVIDED BY THIS CITY UTILITY.

THE CITY OF AUSTIN HAS ITS OWN TELEPHONE NETWORK CONNECTING ALL CITY BUILDINGS.

THE CITY PROVIDES PUBLIC ACCESS TELEVISION CHANNELS AND THE PRODUCTION FACILITIES TO CREATE CONTENT.

THE CITY SENDS OUT EMERGENCY ALERTS TO CITIZENS.

THE CITY OF AUSTIN NOW OPERATES A PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS UTILITY, JUST LIKE THE WATER UTILITY AND THE ELECTRIC UTILITY.

THIS CITY OF AUSTIN INFORMATION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS UTILITY NEEDS THE CITIZEN OVERSIGHT PROVIDED BY THIS COMMISSION.

THIS TASK OF PROVIDING OVERSIGHT OF THE MANY INFORMATION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESOURCES IS IMPORTANT.

THIS CITIZEN OVERSIGHT CANNOT BE SUSPENDED BECAUSE SO MANY MISSION CRITICAL SERVICES ARE PROVIDED TO THE PUBLIC THROUGH THESE RESOURCES.

THIS TASK OF PROVIDING OVERSIGHT OF THE MANY INFORMATION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESOURCES IS ENORMOUS.

THIS OVERSIGHT CANNOT BE FOLDED INTO ANOTHER COMMISSION BECAUSE THE SCOPE OF THIS OVERSIGHT IS SO LARGE.

THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION MUST CONTINUE ITS PURPOSE AS AN INDEPENDENT COMMISSION TO ENSURE CITIZEN ACCESS TO CITY INFORMATION, CITIZEN ACCESS TO SERVICES, AND THE SAFETY OF CITIZENS.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE.

WELL, THANK YOU SO MUCH, MALCOLM.

APPRECIATE YOUR SERVICE AS WELL TO THE CITY BY SERVING ON THE COMMISSION.

UH, DO DO ANY OF THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MALCOLM? NO.

THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR, UH, ADVOCATING FOR US, AND, UM, YEAH, WE APPRECIATE YOUR CONTINUED SERVICE TO THE CITY AND OTHER FORMS. UH, NEXT WE HAVE SUMIT DE GUPTA, ALSO A FORMER MEMBER OF THE COMMISSION, UH, SUMIT.

I WILL LEAVE IT TO YOU.

OKAY.

UH, GOOD EVENING EVERYBODY.

UH, GOOD EVENING CHAIR.

GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS.

UH, IT'S A PLEASURE, UH, TO BE BACK HERE.

I USED TO WARM THAT SEAT RIGHT THERE.

UM, AND I USED TO HURL QUESTIONS TO THE PEOPLE SITTING HERE.

SO I HOPE YOU'LL BE KIND TO ME AND NOT PAY ME BACK FOR THE MANY QUESTIONS THAT I BADGED PRESENTERS WITH.

SO, UM, JUST AS A POINT OF REFERENCE, UM, I'M GONNA KEY OFF THE PRESENTATION THAT MALCOLM GAVE.

HE AND I SERVED TOGETHER FOR MANY YEARS.

I PROBABLY HAVE SERVED LONGER THAN ANYBODY ELSE IN THE HISTORY OF THIS CITY, UH, 10 YEARS.

THAT'S BECAUSE I WAS APPOINTED INITIALLY BY SHERRY GALLO, WHO THEN HANDED OVER THE BATON TO ALLISON ALTER, WHO EVEN WHEN I WAS READY TO RETIRE, REFUSED TO LET ME RETIRE .

AND I HAD A ABSOLUTELY PHENOMENAL TIME BEING A MEMBER OF THIS COMMISSION.

SO I HAVE A VESTED INTEREST IN MAKING SURE THAT THIS COMMISSION GOES FORWARD AND DOES THE KIND OF, UH, GOOD WORK THAT IT IS KNOWN FOR, AND WHICH IS DONE FOR MANY YEARS.

SO, LET'S SEE.

OKAY, LET'S SEE.

AH, THERE YOU GO.

LET GO BACK.

SO THERE ARE THREE THINGS I WANTED TO KEY ON.

ONE IS, UH, UH, SOME, UH, KEY COMMISSION ACTIVITIES THAT IT'S HISTORICALLY BEEN PERFORMING AND THAT ARE EXTREMELY VALUABLE FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF THE CITY FOR WHICH CITIZEN OVERSIGHT IS ESSENTIAL.

OKAY? IT IS NOT SOMETHING THAT THE CITY CAN, OF COURSE, THE CITY CAN DO IT ON ITS OWN.

THEY DO THE WORK, BUT WE ARE THE ONES THAT PROVIDE CITIZEN OVERSIGHT.

OKAY? SO THAT'S NUMBER ONE.

TWO IS I WANT TO TALK ABOUT A SMALL INTERSECTION.

I'VE HEARD RUMORS THAT, UH, EITHER THIS COMMISSION WILL BE SUNSETTED OR WILL BE MERGED WITH ONE OF THE OTHER COMMISSIONS.

SO WHAT I DID WAS I WENT IN TO THE BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS WEBSITE, AND I LOOKED AT ALL THE COMMISSIONS, AND I FOUND ONLY ONE WITH WHICH IT HAS A TANGENTIAL INTEREST, A SLIGHT OVERLAP.

BUT I WORKED IN THE INDUSTRY, THE IT INDUSTRY FOR 44 YEARS.

AND I LEARNED VERY EARLY THAT IF YOU MERGE IDEAS TOGETHER UNDER THE SAME ROOF, YOU DILUTE THE PURPOSE OF THAT ORGANIZATION.

YOU NEED TO HAVE FOCUS AREAS.

SO THERE'S A FOCUS AREA OF THIS COMMISSION, AND THIS OTHER COMMISSION THAT I FOUND HAS ANOTHER FOCUS AREA

[00:10:01]

THAT SHOULD NOT BE MERGED WITH THESE TWO TO CREATE A LARGER COMMISSION, YOU'LL ONLY BE DILUTING BOTH COMMISSIONS.

SO I HAVE A LAST SLIDE, OF COURSE, IS ON RECOMMENDATIONS.

SO, UM, THERE ARE REALLY THREE SPECIFIC AREAS.

IF YOU LOOK AT THE KIND OF WORK THAT THIS COMMISSION DOES, ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT ONE IS TO CLOSE THE DIGITAL DIVIDE THAT EVEN TODAY EXISTS SO THAT YOU CAN ENHANCE DIGITAL LITERACY, AND IN PARTICULAR, IN UNDERSERVED GROUPS AND NEIGHBORHOODS.

NOW, I WAS THE, UH, CO-DIRECTOR OF THE, UH, AUS AUSTRALASIAN COMPLETE COUNT COMMITTEE.

AND AS PART OF THAT EFFORT, I FOUND OUT THAT WE ARE VERY PROUD OF THE CITY.

IT'S A TECH HEAVY CITY, A LOT OF GOOD TECHNICAL TALENT.

BUT EVEN IN THIS CITY, THERE ARE AREAS, POCKETS IN THE CITY LIKE THIS, LIKE PARTICULARLY IN DISTRICT FOUR, WHERE ALL THE NEW IMMIGRANTS AND REFUGEES ARRIVE WAS VERY, VERY LOW ON TECHNICAL DEPTH AND EQUIPMENT.

AND SINCE WE DID MOST OF OUR COUNTING ON SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS, THAT DISTRICT WAS UNDER COUNTED.

SO THERE'S A EFFORT THAT NEEDS TO BE MADE TO MAKE SURE THERE'S NO ACCIDENTAL REDLINING, THERE'S NO ACCIDENTAL DENIAL OF SERVICES, DENIAL OF CAPABILITIES, ET CETERA.

SO THAT'S A VERY, VERY IMPORTANT TASK THAT THIS COMMISSION DOES, AND IT SHOULD CONTINUE TO DO IT BECAUSE THE WORK IS NOT COMPLETED.

OKAY? SO AS PART OF THAT, WE ADVISED, UH, WE, YOU KNOW, WE ADVISED IN CITY PROGRAMS AND INVESTMENTS, AND THE MOST IMPORTANT ONE OF THEM WAS GT OS.

AND IF YOU HAVEN'T COME ACROSS GT OS, YOU SOON WILL.

IT'S A VERY, VERY IMPORTANT PROGRAM.

IN FACT, IN MY TENURE IN THE 10 YEARS WE WORKED WITH THE CITY AND INCREASED THE BUDGET FOR, UH, GT OS.

SO IT'S NOW AT A HEALTHY LEVEL, OKAY? SO THAT WE CAN SPEND THAT MONEY IN MAKING SURE THAT WE CAN RESOLVE SOME OF THE PROBLEMS OF DIGITAL LITERACY THAT STILL EXISTS.

BUT, AND THE OTHER ASPECT WAS, IT WAS AN IDEA THAT WAS A, IT WAS A BENCHMARKING THAT THE LIBRARY DID AND CAME AND PRESENTED TO US TO SEE IF WE WOULD SUPPORT THEM.

AND THAT IS, UH, THEY WOULD RENT OUT HUBS.

THERE ARE PARTS OF THE CITY, LIKE IN DISTRICT FOUR PARTS OF THE CITY WHERE, UH, CHILDREN DIDN'T HAVE ENOUGH COMPUTING EQUIPMENT TO DO THEIR HOMEWORK OR DO THE, UH, THE COLLEGE APPLICATIONS, ET CETERA.

SO THE LIBRARIES STARTED GIVING OUT THESE HUBS ON SHORT-TERM, UH, RENTALS.

AND WE THOUGHT IT WAS A BRILLIANT IDEA.

AND WE PROPOSED TO THE CITY COUNCIL.

IN FACT, THERE WAS A RESOLUTION WE PASSED, AND THE CITY COUNCIL INCREASED THE BUDGET FOR THE LIBRARY SO THAT MORE LIBRARIES COULD GO OUT AND ACQUIRE THESE HUBS AND MAKE THEM AVAILABLE TO, YOU KNOW, CHILDREN FROM POOR FAMILIES.

SO THAT WAS ONE OF THE THINGS, SORRY, OOPS, DID I SAY SOMETHING WRONG? .

.

SO THOSE, I, YOU KNOW, THOSE ARE TWO, UH, INITIATIVES THAT I PERSONALLY AM VERY PROUD OF.

AND THEN IN ADDITION TO THAT, WE PARTNERED WITH MANY, MANY ORGANIZATIONS THAT HAVE SH SIMILAR SHARED VALUES AND, AND, AND GOALS LIKE LATINITAS AND, YOU KNOW, OPEN AUSTIN, ET CETERA.

AND THEY WOULD COME AND TALK TO US.

WE WOULD GO AND VISIT THEM AND WORK WITH THEM TO MAKE SURE THAT THIS, UH, EFFORT IN REMOVING, UH, I MEAN REMOVING THE, THE, THE GREAT DIVIDE IS REMOVED AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE.

UM, THE OTHER ASPECT WAS WHILE WE WERE SUFFERING FROM COVID, UH, WE WORKED WITH ISD.

NOW, IS IS A LITTLE DISTANT BECAUSE IT'S NOT PART OF CITY ADMINISTRATION, BUT THEY HAVE A VESTED INTEREST IN THE CITY, AND WE HAVE A VESTED INTEREST IN THEM.

AND THEN THEY CAME AND MADE A PRESENTATION TO US ON WHAT THEY WERE DOING TO EDUCATE CHILDREN DURING COVID.

AND WE CONSULTED WITH THEM TO TELL THEM THAT NOT ONLY MUST THEY INVEST IN HARDWARE, BUT THEY MUST ALSO INVEST IN TRAINING MATERIALS AND TRAINING FOR THE TEACHERS AND THE STUDENTS SO THEY COULD GO ONLINE.

AND THAT, BY THE WAY, AFFECTED THE CENSUS BECAUSE THE EQUIPMENT THAT WENT TO THE STUDENTS WERE ALSO USED.

WE WERE LAUNCHING ADS INTO THEIR SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS, AND THAT'S HOW WE MANAGED TO RAISE THE, UH, ACCOUNT.

SO THAT, THAT WAS AN AREA THAT WE FOCUSED ON, AND IT CONTINUES TO BE FOCUSED ON IN THE AREA OF REMOVING THE DIGITAL DIVIDE.

THE OTHER ONE IS POLICY GUIDANCE ON EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES.

AND THERE'S A WHOLE, UH, YOU KNOW, HOST OF AREAS THAT WE COVERED.

SO THE FOCUS AREAS WAS, UH, TRANSPARENCY AND SECURITY STANDARDS IN STORAGE OF PERSONAL DATA, AND WAS SPECIFICALLY RELATED TO WHAT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT WAS DOING A PD WAS DOING ON COLLECTING INFORMATION.

AND WE WANTED TO KNOW HOW WELL THEY WERE SECURING THE INFORMATION, HOW ROBUST IT WAS, HOW TRANSPARENT IT WAS, AND HOW LONG THEY

[00:15:01]

WOULD HANG ON TO THE DATA.

OKAY? SO WE WORKED WITH A PD GIVE CONSULTATION TO THEM TO MAKE SURE THAT CITIZENS, UH, UH, UH, DATA WAS SECURE.

UH, THE OTHER ONE, I, I'M JUST GOING TO GO OVER, NOT ALL OF THEM, BUT GIVE YOU EXAMPLES.

UM, UH, THE OTHER ONE IS SURVEILLANCE PRACTICES.

YOU KNOW, WE HAVE CAMERAS THROUGHOUT THE CITY, ONE OF THE PRACTICES THAT PROVIDE US SECURITY, BUT YET MAINTAIN THE, UH, UH, IDENTITY OF CITIZENS, YOU KNOW, SECURE.

AND THE LAST, AND NOT THE LEAST, THIS IS SOMETHING THAT HAPPENED JUST AS I WAS RETIRING.

AND THAT IS WHAT ARE THE, UH, THE, THE, THE, THE, YOU KNOW, YOU HAVE TO BROADBAND THE USE OF AI.

SO THERE WAS A STUDY DONE THAT WAS WORKING GROUP THAT WAS CREATED TO STUDY WHAT ARE THE ETHICAL BOUNDARIES THAT HAVE TO BE ESTABLISHED SO THAT AI CAN BE UTILIZED FOR THE GOOD OF ALL THE CITIZENS OF THIS CITY.

OKAY? AND THE LAST BULLET IS ON RECOMMENDATION AND FOLLOW THROUGH ON STREAMLINING THE CITY, UH, PROCESSES.

AND THE TWO ITEMS I WAS DEEPLY INVOLVED IN.

ONE WAS, OF COURSE, GOING TO THIS HYBRID MEETING DURING COVID.

AS YOU KNOW, WE MOVED TO A HYBRID SETUP.

AND THE QUESTION WAS, WHY CAN'T WE DO THAT? AND THE REASON THAT WAS GIVEN TO US WAS, UH, OPEN MEETINGS ACT, ET CETERA.

BUT WE SAID, YEAH, BUT THESE ARE DIFFERENT TIMES, DIFFICULT TIMES.

AND WE SERVED AS THE GUINEA PIG, AND I WAS ONE OF TWO COUNCIL MEMBERS WHO SERVED AS A GUINEA PIG, WHERE I WOULD CALL IN.

AND IT, I BECAME SO USED TO IT SINCE I LIVED AROUND THE AR ARBORETUM AREA, IT IS QUITE PAINFUL TO DRIVE DOWN AT THAT TIME THROUGH MOPAC.

SO SINCE WE WENT TO HYBRID MEETING, I THINK I SAT IN THAT CHAIR ONLY ONCE.

SO OUT OF THE 10 YEARS, I OCCUPIED THAT CHAIR FIVE YEARS.

AND THE OTHER FIVE YEARS I DID IT FROM MY OFFICE AT HOME.

AND SO NOW IT HAS BECOME UBIQUITOUS, BUT THIS COMMISSION IS THE ONE THAT MADE IT HAPPEN.

AND IT IS THIS KIND OF WORK THAT WE DO IN THIS COMMISSION THAT HAS TO CONTINUE.

OKAY? AND THE LAST ONE, OF COURSE, THERE WAS A CREATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL VOTING HISTORY.

IT WAS A CITIZEN WHO CAME AND SAT HERE AND GAVE THIS REQUEST, AND WE WORKED WITH THE CLERK'S OFFICE, CITY CLERK'S OFFICE, AND MADE IT HAPPEN.

OKAY? IT IS PART OF THE STREAMLINING PROCESS THAT CONTINUE, THAT HAS TO CONTINUE TO HAPPEN AS THE CITY MOVES FORWARD.

AND AGAIN, THIS CANNOT HAPPEN WITHOUT CITIZEN OVERSIGHT, OKAY? BOTH FROM THE STANDPOINT OF THE INDIVIDUAL WHO MADE THE PRESENTATION, AND FOR ALL THE PEOPLE WHO SIT HERE AND MAKE THAT HAPPEN WITH THE CITY.

OKAY? SO LAST SLIDE, PLEASE.

OH, NO, SECOND LAST SLIDE.

SO I THOUGHT I'D PUT THE LAST SLIDE.

PICTORIALLY.

I WENT AND LOOKED AT ALL THE COMMISSIONS, AND I FOUND ECONOMIC PROSPERITY COMMISSION IS THE ONLY ONE WITH WHICH IT HAS A TANGENTIAL INTEREST, AND ONLY IN THE AREA OF GTOP S BECAUSE THEY'RE ABOUT INCREASING PROSPERITY IN THE CITY.

SO THE MORE PEOPLE YOU HAVE WHO ARE TRAINED WITH, YOU KNOW, DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY, THE MORE LABOR FORCE, THE, THE, THE RICHER THE LABOR FORCE.

SO GTOP S HAS SOME OVERLAP, BUT THE REASON THAT THE OVERLAP IS JUST LIMITED TO THAT LITTLE, UH, YOU KNOW, INTERSECTION IN THE VENN DIAGRAM IS BECAUSE GTOP S HAS A LOT OF TECHNICAL DEPTH, AND THIS IS WHAT THE TECHNICAL DEPTH IS.

SO IT BELONGS HERE, EVEN THOUGH THERE'S THIS OVERLAP WITH THE PROSPERITY COMMISSION, AND THESE OTHER BOXES ARE ALL THE OTHER THINGS THAT WE DO THAT I JUST REFERRED TO IN THE LAST SLIDE.

SO THIS COMMISSION DOES A WHOLE LOT MORE THAN GTOP S WHOLE LOT MORE, OKAY? AND THIS KIND OF ACTIVITY WILL CONTINUE.

SO I HOPE THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE DECIDES TO NOT ONLY KEEP THIS COMMISSION RUNNING, NOT MERGE IT WITH ANOTHER COMMISSION, BUT KEEP THIS COMMISSION RUNNING AND TO SUPPORT IT WITH, YOU KNOW, THE STAFF HERE SO THAT THIS COMMISSION SUCCEEDS FOR THE GOOD OF THE CITY.

SO THAT'S MY LAST SLIDE.

I SHOULD GO TO MY LAST SLIDE.

OKAY.

SO BASICALLY, THOSE ARE THE WORDS WHICH I JUST SAID.

OKAY.

THERE ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU SO MUCH.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR FORMER COMMISSIONER SUPTA? DOES SOUND LOOK, LOOK LIKE IT? OKAY.

SOUNDS LIKE YOU NAILED IT.

THANK YOU, .

THANK YOU.

IT'S A PLEASURE.

I APPRECIATE, APPRECIATE YOUR SERVICE TO THE, THE CITY FOR OVER 10 YEARS, SERVING ON THE COMMISSION AND, UH, FOR THE WORK THAT YOU CONTINUE TO DO, SUMIT.

SO, UH, THANK YOU.

HOPEFULLY WE CAN HAVE BOTH YOU AND, AND MALCOLM BACK AGAIN VERY SOON.

THANK YOU.

I CAN BE REACHED , YOU HAVE MY NUMBER, , OF COURSE.

WITH THAT.

UH, WE ALSO HAVE A THIRD CITIZEN HERE, UH, TO, UH, ADDRESS THE COMMISSION, UM, ABOUT, UH, OUR IMPACT WITHIN THE COMMUNITY.

WE HAVE KEVIN WELCH FROM,

[00:20:01]

UM, EFF AUSTIN.

KEVIN, I'LL TURN IT OVER TO YOU WHEN YOU'RE READY.

UM, GOOD EVENING.

UH, MEMBERS OF THE TECHNOLOGY COMMISSION, UM, MOST OF YOU, UH, PROBABLY KNOW ME AT THIS POINT, BUT FOR THOSE WHO DON'T, AND FOR THOSE WHO ARE WATCHING THIS MEETING ONLINE OR LATER VIA THE ARCHIVE VIDEO, MY NAME IS KEVIN WELCH, AND I'M THE CURRENT PRESIDENT OF THE BOARD AT EFF AUSTIN, A TEXAS NONPROFIT BASED IN AUSTIN THAT DOES EDUCATION AND ADVOCACY WORK AROUND DIGITAL CIVIL LIBERTIES ISSUES.

AS PART OF THAT WORK, A FEW MONTHS AGO, I GAVE A PRESENTATION TO THE TECHNOLOGY COMMISSION ON THE SUBJECT OF AUTOMATED LICENSE PLATE READERS OR APRS.

AND I'M DELIGHTED AND HONORED THAT THE TECHNOLOGY COMMISSION HAS ASKED ME BACK THIS TIME TO GIVE MY THOUGHTS ON THE TECHNOLOGY COMMISSION ITSELF AND THE VALUE IT PROVIDES TO THE CITY AND CITIZENS OF AUSTIN.

THE CITY OF AUSTIN HAS MANY COMMISSIONS, MOST OF WHICH ARE A VITAL AND VALUABLE SPACE WHERE CITIZENS CAN COME AND SPEAK WITH APPOINTED ADVOCATES WHO ARE SUBJECT AREA EXPERTS FOR THE TOPICS UNDER THE COMMISSION COMMISSION'S PURVIEW IN THE INTEREST OF MAKING SURE THAT THE CITY'S COMMISSIONS ARE FUNCTIONING WELL, FULFILLING THEIR MANDATES, AND ARE ENGAGED IN TOPICS OF SUFFICIENT INTEREST TO THE CITIZENS TO WARRANT A CITY COMMISSION.

THE CITY IS CURRENTLY CONDUCTING AN AUDIT TO EXPLORE WHICH CITY BOARD SHOULD POTENTIALLY BE SUNSET.

AS I HOPE MY TESTIMONY TODAY WILL MAKE CLEAR TO THOSE CONDUCTING THIS AUDIT.

THE CITY'S TECHNOLOGY COMMISSION IS AN EXTREMELY VALUABLE AND NECESSARY BOARD TO THE CITIZENS OF AUSTIN.

AND I STRONGLY ENCOURAGE THE CITY TO NOT ONLY KEEP THE COMMISSION AROUND, BUT IF ANYTHING, TO GIVE IT MORE RESOURCES AND EXPAND ITS SCOPE.

EFF AUSTIN'S RELATIONSHIP WITH THE TECHNOLOGY COMMISSION IS LONGSTANDING AND PREDATES MY TIME WITH EFF AUSTIN, WITH OUR FORMER BOARD MEMBER, COURTNEY ROSENTHAL, HAVING SERVED AS A COMMISSIONER MANY YEARS AGO, ALTHOUGH I BELIEVE THE COMMISSION WAS KNOWN BY ITS FORMER NAME OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AT THAT TIME.

IN MORE RECENT TIMES, IN ADDITION TO PRESENTING TO THE COMMISSION ON THE TOPIC OF APRS, I'VE WORKED WITH THE COMMISSION IN ITS WORK GROUP ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE.

IN ALL OF MY INTERACTIONS WITH THE COMMISSION, I HAVE BEEN DELIGHTED AND IMPRESSED BY THE BREADTH OF EXPERIENCE, DEPTH OF EXPERTISE, AND CONVIVIAL RAPPORT THAT THE COMMISSIONERS BRING TO THEIR WORK.

ONE OF THE MAIN THINGS THAT ONE DESIRES IN THE CITY COMMISSION IS A DELIBERATIVE BODY THAT IS MORE ACCESSIBLE AND APPROACHABLE FOR DEEP DISCUSSION THAN ONE CAN USUALLY OBTAIN AT A CITY COUNCIL MEETING.

AND IN THIS DEPARTMENT, THE TECHNOLOGY COMMISSION IS A SHINING SUCCESS.

TO SPEAK MORE SPECIFICALLY ABOUT THIS COMMISSION'S ROLE AND WHY IT IS SO VITAL FOR AUSTIN, LET'S START WITH THE OBVIOUS.

IF YOU HAVEN'T NOTICED, AUSTIN LIKES TO PRESENT ITSELF TO THE WORLD AS A TECHNOLOGICALLY SAVVY CITY.

WE ARE RIGHTFULLY PROUD OF OUR MONIKER OF SILICON HILLS AND GOING ALL THE WAY BACK TO THE 1960S THROUGH EIGHTIES, WITH COMPANIES LIKE TRA CORE IBM, TEXAS INSTRUMENTS, MOTOROLA NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS, DELL, MCC, AND ORIGIN SYSTEMS. AUSTIN HAS BEEN LEADING THE COUNTRY FORWARD IN THE TECHNOLOGY SECTOR TODAY.

NUMEROUS MAJOR COMPANIES LIKE META ALPHABET, ORACLE, TESLA, APPLE, AMAZON, A MD, INTEL AND SPACEX HAVE HEADQUARTERS.

OUR LARGE SATELLITE OFFICES HERE.

TO SAY THAT TECHNOLOGY IS IMPORTANT TO WHAT MAKES AUSTIN, AUSTIN IS AN UNDERSTATEMENT, TO SAY THE LEAST.

AND THEREFORE, IT STANDS TO REASON THAT WE WANT BOTH OUR CITIZENS TO BE PROVIDED ADVOCATES AND OUR COUNCIL MEMBERS TO BE PROVIDED EXPERTS.

WHEN THE SUBJECT OF LEGISLATION AND THE REGULATION OF TECHNOLOGY COMES UP AT CITY HALL, WHICH IT FREQUENTLY DOES, BEYOND THE PRESENCE OF THE TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY IN AUSTIN, IS THE REALITY THAT WE ARE LIVING THROUGH A TECHNOLOGICALLY TRANSFORMATIVE EPOCH, A SECESSION OF TECHNOLOGIES OVER THE LAST 50 YEARS, PERSONAL COMPUTERS, THE INTERNET, THE WORLDWIDE WEB, SMARTPHONE, AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES, DRONES, GENERATIVE AI, AND MANY OTHERS HAVE TRANSFORMED THE WORLD WE LIVE IN.

THE PACE OF CHANGE CAN BE OVERWHELMING, AND EVEN TRADE EXPERTS IN THESE FIELDS FREQUENTLY HAVE TROUBLE KEEPING UP TO DATE WITH THE LATEST DEVELOPMENTS TO THE AVERAGE CITIZEN.

THE EFFECTS OF THESE TECHNOLOGIES ARE KEENLY FELT, BUT IT IS OFTEN DIFFICULT FOR THEM TO TRULY UNDERSTAND HOW THESE TECHNOLOGIES WORK AT A DEEP LEVEL, WHICH CAN HAMPER THEIR ABILITY TO OFFER EFFECTIVE REMEDIES TO THEIR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES WHEN THESE TECHNOLOGIES ENDANGER AND VIOLATE THEIR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS.

FURTHERMORE, OUR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES THEMSELVES ARE OFTEN NOT TECHNOLOGY EXPERTS AND ARE EXPECTED TO EVALUATE LEGISLATION AROUND TECHNOLOGY AND ITS REGULATION WITHOUT ALWAYS HAVING THE SUBJECT AREA EXPERTISE TO EVALUATE HOW EFFECTIVE A PARTICULAR REMEDY MAY BE, OR IF IT MAY BRING UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES.

THIS CAN LEAVE THEM VULNERABLE, BOTH TO LOBBYISTS WHO ARE MORE INTERESTED IN THEIR EMPLOYER'S BOTTOM LINE THAN THE PUBLIC GOOD.

AND TO THE VOICES OF THE LOUDEST ACTIVISTS ON ALL SIDES OF AN ISSUE.

GROUPS WHO USUALLY MEAN WELL AND CAN OF COURSE SPEAK TO THEIR OWN LIVED EXPERIENCES AND THE HARMS TECHNOLOGY HAS SUBJECTED THEM TO, BUT WHOSE PROPOSED SOLUTIONS MAY NOT BE GUIDED BY AN UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT THE TECHNOLOGY CAN AND CAN'T DO, AND WHAT REMEDIES HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE ACTUALLY EFFECTIVE IN THE PAST SEVERAL YEARS, WE HAVE SEEN NUMEROUS DEBATES AT DAWSON CITY HALL AROUND A HOST OF TECHNOLOGY ISSUES RANGING FROM ALPS TO RIDE SHARE APPS, FROM FACIAL RECOGNITION TO SURVEILLANCE OF OUR PARKS AND LIBRARIES, TO EVEN NOW ABOUT WHEN AND HOW THE CITY SHOULD HANDLE CITY AND CITIZEN DATA WITH THIRD PARTY VENDORS.

THESE ISSUES AREN'T GOING AWAY.

AND AS OUR WORLD BECOMES EVER MORE TRANSFORMED BY TECHNOLOGY, OUR CITIZENS AND OUR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES WILL NEED TO INCREASINGLY HAVE

[00:25:01]

INFORMED VOICES THEY CAN TURN TO FOR ADVOCACY AND GUIDANCE.

THE TECHNOLOGY COMMISSION HAS ALREADY FULFILLED THIS ROLE IN NUMEROUS WAYS OVER THE YEARS, AND I TRUST THAT THE CITY OF AUSTIN WILL SEE THE VITAL NECESSITY OF ALLOWING THIS COMMISSION TO CONTINUE.

ITS INVALUABLE WORK, AND I PERSONALLY LOOK FORWARD TO CONTINUING TO WORK WITH THE COMMISSION IN THE FUTURE.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND FOR ALLOWING ME TO SPEAK.

THANK YOU SO MUCH, KEVIN.

UH, ANY QUESTIONS FOR KEVIN FROM THE COMMISSION? WELL SAID.

WE APPRECIATE YOU COMING IN PERSON AND, UH, CONTINUING TO ADVOCATE FOR US.

UH, HOPE TO HAVE YOU BACK REALLY SOON.

AND, UM, ON A PERSONAL NOTE, UH, THANK YOU, UH, FOR YOUR INPUT TO THE RECOMMENDATION THAT WE'RE TAKING UP LATER TONIGHT.

SO, YEAH, I DIDN'T WANNA TOOT MY OWN HORN, BUT I'M, UH, VERY HAPPY FOR MY SMALL CONTRIBUTIONS TO SAID RECOMMENDATION, .

THANKS AGAIN.

SO WITH THAT, UM, I THINK BETWEEN LAST MONTH AND THIS MONTH, WE HAD NINE OR 10 INDIVIDUALS, UH, INDIVIDUALS PLUS ORGANIZATIONS, UH, COME THROUGH AND GIVE IMPACT STATEMENTS.

UM, SO WE WILL PACKAGE THAT UP AND SEND IT TO THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE, UH, WHO WILL BE, UH, PRESENTING AND MAKING A RECOMMENDATION TO THE AUDIT AND FINANCE COMMITTEE, UH, DURING THEIR MEETING IN OCTOBER.

SO, UH, ENCOURAGE ALL COMMISSIONERS TO REACH OUT TO THEIR INDIVIDUAL CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS, UM, ON THEIR THOUGHTS AROUND CONTINUING OUR WORK ON THE COMMISSION.

UM, SO WITH

[4. Approval of the artificial intelligence working group’s recommendation for establishing community input and technology commission review for sensitive technology contracts]

THAT, UH, I'M GONNA SKIP US TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FOUR.

AND I DO SEE COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS, UH, WAS ABLE TO, TO JOIN US.

UH, COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS, SINCE THIS ITEM ORIGINATED FROM YOUR, UH, WORKING GROUP.

WANTED TO GIVE YOU THE OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE SOME BACKGROUND CONTEXT, UH, AND WALK US THROUGH, UH, THE RECOMMENDATION THAT WE HAVE THE AGENDA TONIGHT.

ALL RIGHT.

HELLO ALL.

UM, COMMISSIONER BRIAN AM WILLIAMS FROM DISTRICT ONE.

UM, AND I AM ALSO, UH, HELPING AND HEADING THE, UH, WORKING GROUP ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, UH, WITH THIS, UH, AUSTIN TECHNOLOGY COMMISSION.

UH, ONE OF THE THINGS WE ARE LOOKING AT ARE A SERIES OF RECOMMENDATIONS THAT WE PLAN TO SEND TO CITY HALL, UH, WITH THE INTEREST OF REALLY DOING WHAT'S BEST FOR THE CITIZENS REGARDING WHAT'S HAPPENING WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE ANCILLARY ISSUES THAT, THAT, UH, INVOLVES AND CAUSES.

UM, OUR GOAL IS TO, UH, REALLY ENSURE THAT CITIZENS ARE PROTECTED, UM, THAT BUSINESS CAN STILL FLOURISH IN THAT ENVIRONMENT, AND THAT WE ARE NOT, UH, CREATING AN ENVIRONMENT WHERE WE ALLOW THE, I GUESS I'LL SAY LEAST DESIRABLE, UH, OUTCOMES OF TECHNOLOGY TO BE THE OUTCOME WE HAVE HERE IN AUSTIN.

UM, JUST LIKE, UH, WAS MENTIONED EARLIER, AUSTIN BRANDS ITSELF AS A TECHNOLOGY CITY, AND IT HAS BEEN EXACTLY THAT FOR A NUMBER OF DECADES.

AND AS SUCH, MAKES SENSE THAT AUSTIN WOULD HAVE THE SMARTEST AND MOST, UH, CONSCIENTIOUS WAYS OF DEALING WITH NEW TECHNOLOGIES THAT AFFECT OUR CITIZENS.

SO WE ARE LOOKING TO MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS THAT ARE IN THAT DIRECTION.

UM, AND WE HAVE ONE TO TALK ABOUT HERE, WHICH I CAN GO INTO GREATER DETAIL ABOUT, UM, WHICH IS ONE OF OUR FIRST, AND WE'LL BE MAKING SEVERAL MORE OVER THE, THE, THE NEAR FUTURE.

UH, SO CURRENTLY DO WE HAVE THE TEXT OF THE RECOMMENDATION WITH US? UH, WE DO.

EVERYONE IN THE ROOM, UH, HAS A PRINTED COPY, AND IT IS ALSO AVAILABLE, UH, BEING PULLED UP.

UM, NOW.

PERFECT.

AND YES, THIS IS A TEXT OF THE RECOMMENDATION WE MADE PREVIOUS.

EXCELLENT.

SO THE SPIRIT OF THIS RECOMMENDATION CENTERS AROUND, UH, A TOPIC WE HEARD ABOUT A BIT EARLIER WITH REGARD TO SURVEILLANCE IN THE CITY.

UM, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS ARE BEING USED IN WAYS THAT COLLECT LARGE AMOUNTS OF DATA, UH, IN ORDER TO, IN SOME CASES, UH, THE GOAL IS TO PREVENT CRIME IN SOME CASES.

THE, UH, GOAL IS TO IDENTIFY THOSE WHO ARE POTENTIALLY PERPETRATORS OF SOME CRIME.

UH, BUT IN ORDER TO FIND THOSE, UH, INDIVIDUALS OR TO KIND OF IDENTIFY THOSE POTENTIAL INDIVIDUALS, UH, WE'RE COLLECTING VERY LARGE AMOUNTS OF DATA AND DOING SO WITH, UH, EXTERNAL VENDORS TO THE CITY WHERE WE HAVE, UH, VERY LITTLE OVERSIGHT, AND IN SOME CASES, VERY LITTLE KNOWLEDGE ABOUT HOW DATA'S BEING HANDLED, UH, WHAT DATA'S BEING COLLECTED, HOW LONG THAT DATA STAYS, UH, AND WE ALSO, UH, HAVE A LACK OF ABILITY FOR RECOURSE, RIGHT? SO IF LARGE AMOUNTS OF DATA ARE BEING COLLECTED, AND MOST OF IT IS NOT BEING USED, UH, DO CITIZENS WHO HAVE CREATED THAT DATA, WHO ARE THAT DATA ESSENTIALLY, UH, DO THEY HAVE A MEANS TO ENGAGE WITH THOSE VENDORS AND THAT INFORMATION TO FIND OUT,

[00:30:01]

UH, ANYTHING THAT'S IMPORTANT TO THEM? CAN THE CITY RIGHT, UH, LIMIT HOW THAT DATA IS USED, OR HOW LONG THE DATA IS CAPPED? JUST DIFFERENT THINGS OF THE NATURE.

UM, WE DON'T THINK IT IS BALANCED, UH, FOR A VENDOR WORKING FOR THE CITY TO HAVE THE ABILITY TO COLLECT LARGE AMOUNTS OF DATA.

AND THE CITY CAN'T, UH, EITHER GET THEIR HANDS ON IT TO AUDIT IT, TO SEE THAT IT'S DELETED, IF IT'S NOT BEING USED FOR ITS ORIGINAL INTENDED PURPOSE OR ANY OTHER, UH, SENSE OF RECOURSE DATA IS THE NEW GOLD, RIGHT? DATA IS THE NEW OIL.

UH, I UNDERSTAND VERY WELL WHY, UH, COMPANIES WOULD WANT TO COLLECT LARGE AMOUNTS OF DATA, UH, IN ANY CIRCUMSTANCE, PARTICULARLY HERE.

UH, BUT AT THE SAME TIME, THE MOTIVATION FOR THAT IS SOMETIMES MISALIGNED WITH THE MOTIVATION OF PROTECTING THE CITIZENS AND GIVING THE CITIZENS A QUALITY OF LIFE IN AN ENVIRONMENT THAT THEY APPROVE OF HERE IN AUSTIN.

SO THIS FIRST RECOMMENDATION IS TO, UH, HOPEFULLY RECOMMEND TO THE CITY THAT WE TAKE A DIFFERENT COURSE OF ACTION WITH REGARD TO TWO SPECIFIC, UH, INTERACTIONS THAT HAVE HAPPENED HERE.

UH, ONE BEING A, UH, SURVEILLANCE, UH, RELATED ISSUE WITH, UH, OUR PARKS WHERE WE HAVE SOME CAMERAS THAT WATCH THE PARKS IN ORDER TO KIND OF CATCH BAD ACTORS, BUT IN THE PROCESS OF THAT, THEY CAPTURE EVERYONE.

UM, AND THE SAME THING WITH A LICENSE PLATE READER, UH, TYPE OF SURVEILLANCE, UH, CIRCUMSTANCE WHERE, AGAIN, THE INTENDED, UH, GOAL IS TO CAPTURE OR IDENTIFY BAD ACTORS.

BUT IN THE COURSE OF THAT, UH, WE CAPTURE EVERYONE AND VERY FEW, UH, VERY SMALL BITS OF THAT DATA ARE BEING UTILIZED FOR ITS INTENDED PURPOSE.

SO OUR RECOMMENDATION HERE, UH, ADDRESSES THAT.

SO, UH, WE CAN TALK A BIT MORE ABOUT THE, THE SPECIFICS OR I DON'T KNOW IF WE'RE GONNA DO A READING HERE OR HOW FAR WE'RE GOING TO GO INTO IT, BUT I'M GOING TO, TO DEFER TO STEVEN, UH, FOR WHAT WE BELIEVE NEXT STEPS TO BE.

YEAH.

UM, AND ALSO WANT TO GIVE COMMISSIONER PREVE, SINCE SHE WAS A CO-AUTHOR OF THE, UM, OF THE RECOMMENDATION, AN OPPORTUNITY TO, UM, TO CHIME IN AS WELL.

THANK YOU.

I, UM, I AM, I'M HAPPY WITH THIS.

I THINK THAT THE, INITIALLY WHEN WE WERE TALKING ALTOGETHER, WE WERE, UH, IN OUR CONVERSATIONS TALKING ABOUT APRS SPECIFICALLY.

SO I REALLY LIKE THAT THIS IS JUST IN GENERAL AROUND SENSITIVE TECH, AND THERE'S SOME REALLY GREAT, YOU KNOW, SECTIONS AROUND THIS COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT PIECE, THE COMMISSION REVIEWS, SO LIKE HIGHLIGHTING OUR ROLE THERE.

UH, THE ONLY SPECIFIC THING THAT I WAS THINKING OF FROM OUR CONVERSATIONS WAS SPECIFICALLY AROUND APRS AND THE BEST PRACTICES FROM OTHER MUNICIPALITIES AND STATES.

UH, BUT I THINK THAT WOULD ACTUALLY BE POSSIBLY COVERED UNDER COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS SINCE THAT IS PART OF HOW WE WANNA WORK AND THE KIND OF EXAMPLES AND REFERENCES THAT WE MIGHT WANT TO, UM, POINT TO.

I'M SPECIFICALLY THINKING ABOUT KEVIN'S MENTION OF THE NEW HAMPSHIRE LAW, UH, YOU KNOW, WHERE THERE'S LIKE A THREE, WHAT IS IT, THREE MINUTE MAXIMUM, UM, DATA RETENTION POLICY FOR ANY SORT OF APRS.

SO THERE IS THOSE BEST PRACTICES THAT EXIST FOR SOME OF THE TECHNOLOGY POINT BEING, LIKE, JUST SO THAT WE CAN SAY THAT THAT'S HOW WE'RE ALSO THINKING ABOUT IT, THAT WE'RE, WE'LL REFERENCE THOSE THINGS.

BUT I THINK THAT THAT IS COVERED UNDER THE COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION.

IF SOMEONE THINKS IT SHOULD BE SPECIFICALLY HIGHLIGHTED, WE CAN DO THAT.

UM, BUT THAT WAS MY ONLY SPECIFIC THING THAT I WOULD ADD.

OKAY.

KEVIN, DID YOU, UH, AS A CITIZEN COLLABORATOR, CO-AUTHOR, SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT, UH, ALSO WANNA GIVE YOU THE OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE INPUT AND CONTEXT TO THE COMMISSION? UM, PER JUST GONNA SAY, UM, YES, IT IS THREE MINUTES IN THE NEW HAMPSHIRE LAW, UM, BY FAR THE, UH, STRICTEST RETENTION LIMIT THAT I'M AWARE OF ANYWHERE, UM, I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THAT BECOME MORE COMMON.

UM, UM, YEAH, AND I GUESS, UM, I WOULD SAY I, I THINK YOUR FEE IS GOOD.

UM, I MIGHT ALSO POINT YOU AT YOU TO, UH, THE ONE BULLET THAT, UM, I SPECIFICALLY AUTHORED THAT SPECIFICALLY MENTIONS THAT WE SHOULD BE SEEKING ALIGNMENT WITH EXISTING REGULATION.

I SPECIFICALLY POINT TO, UH, SOME OF TEXAS'S STATE LAWS, UM, TRAGA AND, UM, WHATEVER THE ACRONYM FOR THE, UH, DATA PRIVACY ONE IS TRAGA ISS, THE AI ONE, BUT I SPECIFICALLY CALL THAT OUT AS WE SHOULD BE SEEKING TO BE IN ALIGNMENT WITH STATE AND FEDERAL LAW ON THESE ISSUES AND LOOK TO THEM FOR GUIDANCE.

SO JUST, YEAH.

UM, BUT YES, I AGREE WITH YOUR FEEDBACK AS I PUT THAT IN THERE.

GREAT.

I JUST SAW THAT, AND THAT WOULD BE A LAW, RIGHT? SO IN THAT CASE, IT IS COVERED, I THINK, IN HERE, WHICH IS GOOD.

YES.

COMMISSIONER COMBI, UH, LOOKING THROUGH THE RECOMMENDATION, THE ONE AREA WHICH I DON'T REALLY SEE COVERED, AND I WAS CURIOUS OF THOUGHTS, WAS ABOUT SHARING OF DATA WITH OTHER GOVERNMENTAL JURISDICTIONS AND ALSO ACCESSING DATA FROM OTHER GOVERNMENTS.

I MEAN, LIKE FLOCK, ONE OF THE BIG THINGS THEY WERE PUSHING WAS THE FACT THAT LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES COULD

[00:35:01]

COLLABORATE WITH EACH OTHER ACROSS WHOLE AREAS.

AND YOU, I'M NOT SEEING NECESSARILY A RECOMMENDATION ABOUT HOW MUCH WE SHOULD, YOU KNOW, ALLOW OUR CITY TO CO, YOU KNOW, PARTICIPATE IN THOSE KIND OF SYSTEMS. MM-HMM .

I DO SEE ONE, UM, BULLET UNDER ONE OF THESE SUB-BULLETS UNDER, I DON'T KNOW HOW TO REFERENCE THIS.

YEAH.

SUB-BULLET NUMBER TWO, STRICT LIMITATIONS ON DATA'S THE ONE SHARING CONSISTENT WITH COUNCIL POLICY.

OKAY.

THAT'S, THAT'S GOOD.

WE MAYBE WANT TO ADD SOMETHING ABOUT ACCESSING DATA FROM OTHER JURISDICTIONS AS WELL.

LIKE WHAT? SURE.

A POLICY BE THERE MM-HMM .

MM-HMM .

OH, SO YOU MEAN LIKE OPPOSITE, LIKE RIGHT.

HOW WOULD WE USE THE OTHER WAY AROUND? YEAH.

YEAH.

I MEAN, I DON'T KNOW.

I MEAN, WE'RE OBVIOUSLY MOSTLY CONCERNED WITH THE CITIZENS HERE OF AUSTIN BECAUSE THIS IS THE CITY OF AUSTIN, BUT YEAH, WE JUST WANNA MAKE SURE THAT WE UNDERSTAND THE BOUNDARIES.

IS THERE A SPECIFIC, UM, AMENDMENT TO THE LANGUAGE YOU'D LIKE TO MAKE? UH, LET ME THINK ABOUT THAT.

SURE.

AND I'LL TALK BACK IN LATER IN THE MEETING.

OKAY.

YES, KEVIN? UM, I ABSOLUTELY AGREE THAT THAT WOULD BE UNDER THE PURVIEW OF, UH, THESE RECOMMENDATIONS, WHAT WE'RE THINKING OF.

AND I, I LIKE THAT YOU ACTUALLY CALLED OUT THE DATA AS BIDIRECTIONAL.

IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT WHAT WE SHARE WITH OTHER CITIES, BUT WHAT WE WANT OTHER CITIES AND MUNICIPALITIES, UH, TO SHARE WITH US.

SO THAT'S AN EXCELLENT CALL OUT.

I THINK, I DON'T WANNA SPEAK FOR THE, UH, COMMISSIONERS, BUT I, YOU KNOW, MY OWN UNDERSTANDING OF WAS THAT WE WERE TRYING TO NOT GET, UM, WE DIDN'T WANNA PLAY WHACK-A-MOLE WITH EVERY NEW ISSUE.

WE WERE REALLY TRYING TO ESTABLISH A POLICY THAT COULD ACT AS A FRAMEWORK FOR EVERY ISSUE THAT MIGHT COME UP, NOT JUST ONES THAT INVOLVE, UH, DATA SHARING.

THAT BEING SAID, UM, YOU'LL NOTE ONCE AGAIN, THE, UH, BULLET THAT I INTRODUCED PROPOSES THE IDEA THAT WE SHOULD WORK ON ESTABLISHING A SORT OF LIST OF PROHIBITED USES WHERE WE COULD ACTUALLY SHORT CIRCUIT THE WHOLE PROCESS WHERE A CITY COUNCIL'S PROPOSING SOMETHING WITH A VENDOR THAT WOULD DING THE PROHIBITED USES LIST FOR TECHNOLOGY OF THINGS WE JUST DON'T ALLOW, PERIOD.

WE DON'T HAVE TO GO THROUGH A WHOLE, UH, BRING IT TO THE TECHNOLOGY COMMISSION, HAVE CITIZEN INPUT SESSIONS.

IT'S JUST LIKE, NOPE, WE, AS A CITY THAT'S PROHIBITED.

WE DON'T DO THAT AND SAVE EVERYBODY TIME AND MONEY.

SO I WOULD HOPE THAT, UH, INAPPROPRIATE DATA SHARING, I WOULD HOPE WOULD EVENTUALLY END UP ON THIS PROHIBITED USES LIST.

YEAH.

THANK YOU.

I WOULD LIKE TO CHIME IN AS WELL.

UM, I THINK IF CITY DATA IS TO BE SHARED BETWEEN A, BETWEEN AUSTIN AND ANOTHER MUNICIPALITY, THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE BY THE CITY OF AUSTIN, UM, IT DOES NOT NEED TO BE DONE BY A VENDOR OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN.

MM-HMM .

UM, AND IN THIS CASE, WE'RE DISCUSSING THE BEHAVIOR OF VENDORS AND WHERE WE'D LIKE TO DRAW THE LINES WITH WHAT THEY CAN AND CANNOT DO.

THAT IS NOT SPELLED OUT HERE.

BUT I DO THINK IT WOULD BE WISE OF US TO, TO, TO CLEARLY SAY, UM, I CAN'T SAY IF THE CITY SHOULD OR SHOULDN'T SHARE DATA WITH ANOTHER MUNICIPALITY FOR THIS OR THAT REASON, BUT I CAN SAY THAT IF THAT HAPPENS, I WANT IT TO BE AN ELECTED OFFICIAL.

I WANT IT TO BE SOMEONE THAT'S ACCOUNTABLE TO THE CITIZENS.

UM, AND I THINK THAT IS A, AT LEAST AN APPROACH TO AN APPROPRIATE BALANCE.

I THINK YOU NEED TO THINK ABOUT THE WILDFIRE PREVENTION SOFTWARE THAT WAS DEMOED TO US AND SHOWCASED TO THAT, BECAUSE THAT IS DATA SHARING AMONGST MUNICIPAL MUNICIPALITIES IN TRAVIS COUNTY.

AND THERE, I, IT FELT LIKE THERE WAS A DESIRE AMONGST THE COMMISSION TO ENCOURAGE THINGS LIKE THAT.

AND SO I THINK JUST WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT, YOU KNOW, RESTRICTING COOPERATION AT A LOCAL LEVEL, YOU NEED TO BE COGNIZANT OF LIKE, ARE WE PUTTING UP MORE BARRIERS FOR THE SAKE OF PUTTING UP BARRIERS AND INHIBITING, YOU KNOW, WHAT OTHERWISE WOULD BE PRODUCTIVE GROWTH.

YEAH, I THINK THAT'S A GOOD POINT.

AND I THINK FOR THAT SPECIFIC, UM, SCENARIO, I BELIEVE IT WAS COUNCIL POLICY TO SHARE, UM, TO CROSS SHARE THAT INFORMATION WHEN WE TALK ABOUT THE A LPR SITUATION, I BELIEVE, AND KEVIN MEENA, UH, YOU KNOW, DEFINITELY CHIME IN.

I BELIEVE COUNSEL HAD DIRECTED THAT INFORMATION CAPTURED STATE CITY OF AUSTIN, AND THAT HASN'T NECESSARILY BEEN HAPPENING THROUGH THE VENDOR, BUT I'LL DEFER TO YOU ALL ABOUT THAT PRACTICE.

I MEAN, I, UH, WAS NOT THERE FOR THE PRESENTATION ABOUT THE WILDFIRE THING, SO I CAN'T SPEAK DIRECTLY.

I, I WOULD SAY THAT I THINK THERE'S A VERY MATERIAL DIFFERENCE IF THAT IS A PROPOSAL OF DATA SHARING DIRECTLY BETWEEN MUNICIPAL ENTITIES WITHOUT A THIRD PARTY VENDOR IN THE MIX, THAT WOULD MAKE THE TWO VERY DIFFERENT RIGHT THERE.

UM, AND I THINK YET AGAIN, THAT'S, YOU RAISE A CASE OF, WELL, YOU KNOW, WE LIKE TO SAY IN OUR GROUP, YOU KNOW, THAT TECHNOLOGY IS NOT NECESSARILY GOOD OR EVIL, IT'S A TOOL.

IT'S HOW PEOPLE USE IT.

UM, YOU KNOW, EVEN EVEN VERY HOT BUTTON TOPICS RIGHT NOW, LIKE DATA BROKERS, WHICH PROBABLY I WOULD BE HAPPY IF A NATIONAL LAW BANNED THEM OUTRIGHT.

EVEN I WILL ACKNOWLEDGE, UH,

[00:40:01]

WORKING IN THE TECH SECTOR, ONE CAN USE THEM FOR GOOD, ONE CAN USE THEM TO ENRICH DATA TO, UM, HELP A PERSON BECAUSE MAYBE YOU HAVE SOME MISSING DATA, EVEN THEY DON'T KNOW, AND THEY WANT YOU TO FIND IT ACTUALLY A DATA BROKER CAN ACCOMPLISH.

GOOD.

SO I, I APPRECIATE THAT.

CALL OUT THE NUGGETS BLACK AND WHITE.

AND I THINK THAT ACTUALLY SPEAKS TO THE, UH, THE STRENGTH OF THE APPROACH WE'RE TAKING HERE, WHERE WE, YOU'LL NOTE, WE DIDN'T DECIDE TO SIT DOWN AND SAY, HERE'S A LIST OF PROHIBITED THINGS, BECAUSE IT'S VERY EASY TO RUSH OUT LEGISLATION AND HAVE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES.

I, I THINK THAT'S PRECISELY THE POINT OF NOT SPELLING THAT OUT RIGHT NOW, THAT SOMEBODY LIKE YOURSELF COULD SAY, WELL, WAIT, WHAT ABOUT THIS? AND HOW DO WE THREAD THAT NEEDLE OF, YEAH, WE WANT PEOPLE TO BE ABLE TO BE SAFE FROM WILDFIRES AND ALLOW DATA SHARING TO ACCOMPLISH THAT.

HOW CAN WE ACHIEVE THESE GOOD THINGS, UH, WITHOUT HAVING HARMS, LIKE FROM A LPR DATA SHARING.

AND I THINK THAT'S PRECISELY WHY, UH, ONCE AGAIN, SPEAKING TO THE THEME OF WHY THE TECHNOLOGY COMMISSION NEEDS TO STICK AROUND, THESE ARE THORNY THINGS WHERE YOU HAVE TO DEBATE VERY SUBTLE THINGS.

LIKE, WHY IS THIS THING NOT LIKE THIS THING? AND HOW DO WE REGULATE TO ALLOW THAT GOOD THING AND STOP THAT BAD THING? SO I GUESS I'D JUST SAY I THINK THAT'S, YET AGAIN, A GOOD EXAMPLE OF WHY WE'RE NOT SPECIFICALLY, EVEN THOUGH I THINK WE ALL SUSPECT THERE WOULD BE CERTAIN THINGS THAT WOULD END UP ON THAT LIST OF PROHIBITED THINGS, LIKE CERTAIN FORMS OF BIOMETRIC IDENTIFICATION, ET CETERA.

WE JUST DIDN'T WANNA SPELL THEM OUT AT THIS STAGE BECAUSE THAT SHOULD BE A NUANCED, INVOLVED, EVOLVING PROCESS.

SOME OF THE HARMS WE MAY NOT EVEN REALIZE UNTIL THINGS HAPPEN, AND THEN WE HAVE TO RESPOND ACCORDINGLY.

SO, UM, I, I TAKE YOUR POINT.

AND I, I THINK IT'S A GOOD ONE.

AND SO I THINK THAT'S WHY THIS PROCESS THAT WE'RE APPROACH WE'RE TAKING IS A SOLID ONE.

I WANT TO OPEN IT UP TO THE OTHER COMMISSIONERS, UM, THAT ARE VIRTUAL.

UM, I BELIEVE WE HAVE, UH, COMMISSIONER HERITAGE, UM, WANNA GET YOUR THOUGHTS BY NOW.

YOU, YOU WOULD'VE HAD TIME TO REVIEW THE RECOMMENDATION AND THEN, WE'LL, I'LL TURN IT OVER TO COMMISSIONER RICE.

I THINK MY THING, UH, COMMISSIONER COMBY REFERENCED IT AS WELL WAS JUST ON THE, THE SHARING OF INFORMATION ACROSS JURISDICTION.

SO, UM, I THINK THAT WAS THE BIGGEST CALL OUT THAT I SAW, BUT IT, I KNOW IT'S IN HERE, BUT I JUST WANNA BE MINDFUL OF THAT BI-DIRECTIONAL PIECE.

SO I THINK THAT WAS THE, THE, THE MAIN THING I DIDN'T SEE MAYBE AS CLEARLY LAID OUT, BUT IT COULD BE.

WE WANNA KEEP THE LANGUAGE BROAD ENOUGH.

UM, TO KEVIN'S POINT, I'M FINE WITH THAT, BUT I THINK IT'S GREAT WORK.

AND I'M ACTUALLY REALLY EXCITED ABOUT THIS IDEA OF COMMISSIONER REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION.

SO THAT WAY THERE IS A BIT OF, IT CONTINUES TO REINFORCE OUR COMMISSION'S ETHOS AND REASON TO BE AROUND IS THAT WE CAN ESSENTIALLY OFFER RECOMMENDATIONS ABOUT COMMUNITY FEEDBACK.

I LOVED THE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT PUBLIC FORUM PIECE.

UM, I FEEL LIKE WITH THE A LPR PIECE THAT HAPPENED EARLIER, THERE WAS A LOT OF FEEDBACK THAT MIGHT NOT HAVE, UH, BEEN ACCEPTED OR AN OPPORTUNITY TO HEAR ON THAT.

SO, UM, I THINK IF WE HAVE A, A FRAMEWORK FOR COUNCIL TO FOLLOW AND ROLL OUT A POLICY RELATED TO THIS OR PROCESS FOR THIS, I THINK IT'LL BE, UM, HOPEFULLY GIVE A PLATFORM FOR MORE OF THAT ENGAGEMENT THAT FOLKS DIDN'T ALWAYS FEEL THEY HAD LAST EARLIER IN THE YEAR.

YEAH.

AND I, I THINK TO THAT POINT, YOU KNOW, THIS, OUR COMMISSION AT LEAST CURRENTLY ISN'T NECESSARILY TAKING A, UH, POSITION ON THE PAST A LPR ISSUE OR EVEN ON THE, THE PUBLIC PARK SURVEILLANCE ITEM.

BUT, UM, SO I THINK THAT'S GOOD, BUT THE FACT THAT WE ARE, WE'VE COME UP WITH A FRAMEWORK TO DEAL WITH THESE TYPES OF, UM, SITUATIONS AND THESE TYPES OF VENDORS AND THESE TYPES OF PROCUREMENT ACTIVITIES AT THE OUTSET, UM, GIVES A GOOD, UM, FRAMEWORK AND, AND OPPORTUNITY FOR, FOR PUBLIC INPUT.

UH, COMMISSIONER RICE, I WANNA TURN IT OVER TO YOU.

A ANY, UH, THOUGHTS AFTER HAVING REVIEWED THE RECOMMENDATION AS IT'S BEEN PRESENTED? UH, YOU'RE ON MUTE.

YOU CAN'T GET OFF OF MUTE, HUH? OKAY.

WELL, I'M GONNA ASSUME IT'S ALL GOOD ON YOUR END THEN.

GREAT WORK, GUYS.

I THINK WE, THIS IS REALLY, I THINK WE, THIS IS REALLY GOOD.

I THINK WE CAN HEAR YOU NOW.

COMMISSIONER RICE, CAN YOU HEAR ME? YES.

YEAH, I MEAN, YEAH, I WASN'T GONNA ADD ANYTHING NEW.

I, YEAH, I AGREE WITH WHAT'S BEEN SAID.

OKAY.

UM, IT DOESN'T SOUND LIKE ANYONE WANTS TO MAKE ANY, ANY AMENDMENTS.

COMMISSIONER COMBI.

UM, YEAH, FOR LOOKING AT THE STRICT LIMITATIONS

[00:45:01]

AND DATA RETENTION SHARING, I FEEL LIKE THAT IS ADEQUATE FOR THE PURPOSES FOR THIS.

OKAY, GREAT.

OKAY.

WELL, UH, LET'S, UH, I PROPOSE WE MOVE FORWARD THEN.

UH, IS THERE, UH, I WILL ACCEPT A MOTION TO, UH, ACCEPT THE, TO VOTE ON THE RECOMMENDATION AS PRESENTED.

COMMISSIONER HERITAGE, I MAKE A MOTION TO, UH, ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATION FROM THE GREAT AI WORKING GROUP.

CONGRATS, GUYS.

THIS IS GOOD WORK.

IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND? COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS SECOND.

I TH I THINK COMMISSIONER PRI BEAT BEAT YOU TO IT.

AH, .

SO, MOTION PUT FORWARD BY, UH, COMMISSIONER HERITAGE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER PREVI.

UH, ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? NOT SEEING ANY, WE'LL MOVE TO A VOTE.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF, UH, ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION AS PRESENTED.

PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND AND SAY AYE.

AYE.

AYE.

ANY EXTENSIONS, ENGINES, ANYONE AGAINST? NOT SEEING ANYONE.

OKAY.

MOTION CARRIES.

SO, UH, DAN, JESSE, WE'LL WORK WITH YOU TO, UH, GEN TO GET THIS INTO THE SYSTEM AND GENERATE A RECOMMENDATION NUMBER, UM, AS A NEXT STEP.

UH, HOW LONG DOES IT NORMALLY TAKE FOR THOSE TO GO WITHIN THE SYSTEM AND BE ASSIGNED A, A RECOMMENDATION ID? UH, I THINK THE RECOMMENDATION ID IS SOMETHING UP TO US, AT LEAST ON, ON THE CLERICAL STANDPOINT.

SO IT'S JUST BASED ON THE DATE AND THE NUMBER OF RECOMMENDATION.

UH, BUT WITHIN THE SYSTEM, USUALLY IF I UPLOAD IT, UM, IT'LL BE AT LEAST ON YOUR AGENDA OR ON YOUR, UH, COMMISSION PAGE OF DOCUMENTS WITHIN THE END OF THE DAY.

HOPEFULLY, IF I POST IT AT 10, IT'S USUALLY THERE BY FOUR.

UM, BUT IN TERMS OF ACTUALLY MOVING THROUGH TO COUNCIL AND GETTING SEEN, THAT'S A MUCH LONGER TIMELINE.

AND I THINK, UM, IT, IT MIGHT BE A WHILE BEFORE THEY GET BACK AROUND TO, UH, RECOMMENDATIONS.

UM, I'M, I'M NOT SURE IF JESSE, YOU HAVE AN EXACT DATE FOR WHEN COUNCIL MEETS.

WELL, I GUESS MY, MY QUESTION'S A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT.

MY QUESTION IS, WHEN DOES, UH, IT APPEAR, WHEN DOES IT, WHEN DOES THE INTAKE TO THE SYSTEM OCCUR SO THAT IF I REACH OUT TO MY COUNCIL MEMBER AND LET THEM KNOW THAT WE'VE APPROVED A RECOMMENDATION, THEY CAN VIEW IT? YES.

THE, UM, THE RECOMMENDATION IS OFFICIAL ONCE DAN SUBMITS IT INTO THE SYSTEM AND IT'S POSTED TO, UM, THE BCIC SYSTEM.

OKAY.

UH, AND THAT'S WHEN IT BECOMES PUBLICLY VIEWABLE.

UM, AND AT THAT POINT, THE CLERK, THE CLERK'S OFFICE IS AUTOMATICALLY NOTIFIED WHEN THAT IS UPLOADED TO THE SYSTEM.

AND SO IT GETS INTO THE CLERK'S OFFICE'S QUEUE.

UM, AND THEN, UH, MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT IT GOES TO, UM, I BELIEVE THE MAYOR'S OFFICE FOR ASSIGNMENT TO A COMMITTEE.

OKAY.

AND THEN, AND WHAT'S THE TIMETABLE FOR IT TO, UH, GET TO APPEAR WITHIN THE BCIS SYSTEM? UH, I THINK IF, IF MEMORY SERVES, USUALLY IF THINGS ARE APPROVED EITHER AT 10:00 AM OR 3:00 PM UM, SO IF I UPLOAD THIS, LET'S SAY NOON TOMORROW, YOU SHOULD SEE IT AT 5:00 PM BUT THAT'S NOT A GUARANTEE.

I KNOW SOMETIMES THERE'S LIKE A, YOU KNOW, SMALL HICCUPS WITHIN THE SYSTEM.

SO I'D, I'D GIVE IT BY FRIDAY AFTERNOON AT THE VERY LATEST.

OKAY.

SO WITHIN A FEW DAYS.

YEAH.

OKAY.

ALRIGHT.

AND SO THAT WAS GONNA BE MY CALL TO ACTION TO REST TO THE REST OF THE, UH, COMMISSION.

SO, UH, I THINK BY END OF WEEK, CERTAINLY BY, BY MONDAY, UM, THERE'S AN OPPORTUNITY FOR EACH OF US TO ENGAGE WITH OUR CITY COUNCIL, UH, OFFICES, WHOEVER YOUR POINT OF CONTACT IS, AND, UH, SIMPLY DRAW ATTENTION TO THE COMMISSION, THE RECOMMENDATION THAT WE PASSED.

SOUND LIKE A PLAN, EVERYONE.

OKAY.

WELL, THANK YOU COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS FOR, UH, LEADING THE CHARGE ON THIS.

AND THANK YOU, KEVIN, IN THE ROOM FOR PROVIDING, UH, SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTISE AND, UM, LOOK FORWARD TO, TO MANY MORE RECOMMENDATIONS.

SO

[3. Further discussion and updates to approved responses for the evaluation of the recommendations made and other actions taken by the Technology Commission throughout the year and how these reflected or achieved the commission’s directives, identify any overlaps in the role and work of the commission with other boards or commissions, identify policies or City needs that no current board or commission appears to address, evaluate the level of members’ and the community’s engagement, and identify potential bylaw amendments to improve or address any of the foregoing.]

WITH THAT, UH, I'LL GO AHEAD AND MOVE US TO, UH, AGENDA ITEM NUMBER THREE.

UM, SO THIS WAS FURTHER DISCUSSION ON OUR RESPONSES BACK TO THE CLERK'S OFFICE.

UM, THE, UH, THE COMMISSION DID APPROVE ALL OF OUR RESPONSES TO, UM, TO THE QUESTIONS THAT THE CLERK HAD SUBMITTED, UH, LAST TIME AROUND.

UM, DID THOSE GET DISTRIBUTED OUT, DAN, THE, UM, THE SELF-EVALUATION QUESTIONS TO THE COMMISSION? UH, I DON'T THINK SO, AND I, I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT.

UM, I, BUT IT'S, IT'S, IT'S THE SAME QUESTIONS THAT WE ALL SAW THE OTHER NIGHT, BUT I CAN FORWARD THOSE TO THE GROUP.

UM, YOU DO HAVE UNTIL I BELIEVE, THE 24TH TO MAKE ANY ADDITIONAL CHANGES.

UM, BUT YEAH.

AND THAT MIGHT, UH, INVOLVE A SPECIAL CALL, SO, UM, BUT

[00:50:01]

I'LL, I'LL GO AHEAD AND SEND THOSE OVER TO Y'ALL IN THIS MOMENT.

OKAY.

YEAH, IF YOU COULD DO THAT.

'CAUSE I JUST WANNA BRIEFLY WALK THROUGH THE DOCUMENT AND THEN, UM, I DON'T THINK WE'D HAVE A VOTE ON THIS, BUT I DID, DID WANNA MAKE THE COMMISSION AWARE THAT I WAS GONNA ADD THE NEW RECOMMENDATION TO, UH, THE CONTENT, UH, WHEN I SUBMIT IT TO THE CLERK'S OFFICE.

UM, SO I'LL GIVE YOU A MOMENT TO, TO DO THAT.

DAN.

UH, WHILE DAN IS LOOKING THAT UP, CAN I JUST ASK, IT'S, UM, THE SAME QUESTIONS FOR THE GROUP, UM, SHEET THAT WE DID AROUND THE ADVOCACY OF THE COMMISSION? YES.

EXCEPT WE WOULD BE FILLING IT OUT ON OUR OWN, OR IS IT, I'M RESPONSIBLE FOR SUBMITTING IT.

MM-HMM .

UM, I HAVEN'T DONE IT YET, 'CAUSE IT, IT'S NOT DUE UNTIL LATER THIS MONTH.

UM, BUT I SIMPLY WANT TO MAKE EVERYONE AWARE.

UH, WELL, A LOT OF PEOPLE WEREN'T HERE LAST TIME, SO I JUST WANTED TO GO THROUGH IT AND THEN MAKE THE COMMISSION AWARE THAT WAS GONNA MAKE THAT MINOR ADDITION.

OKAY, COOL.

YEAH.

AND STEVEN, WHEN DID WE LOOK AT IT AGAIN? I THINK THAT MIGHT'VE BEEN EITHER JUNE OR AUGUST.

I CAN'T RECALL.

UH, THAT WAS LAST MONTH.

I DON'T THINK YOU WERE PRESENT.

YES.

YEAH.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

YEAH.

ALL RIGHT.

I JUST SENT IT OVER TO ALL THE WHOLE COMMISSION.

UM, IT'S GONNA BE THE ATTACHMENT AND YOU'LL SEE ALL THE QUESTIONS LISTED THERE.

OKAY, GREAT.

I, UM, SO I'M NOT IN THE MEETING, UH, THE WEBEX MEETING, SO FOLKS COULD JUST PULL IT UP ON THEIR OWN AND I'LL JUST TALK THROUGH IT.

UM, SO THE FIRST QUESTION IS WHAT THE NAME OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSION? THE NEXT ONE IS, HAS THE BOARD OF COMMISSION'S ACTIONS COMPLIED WITH CITY COUNCIL DIRECTORS AND BYLAWS? WE HAD AGREED LAST TIME THAT IT DID.

UM, HOW MANY RECOMMENDATIONS DID YOUR BORDER COMMISSION APPROVE? UM, WE ONLY, I, IN RESPONSE TO THIS QUESTION, I ONLY COVERED THE PERIOD, UM, BETWEEN JULY OF 24 AND JUNE OF 25.

SO I WAS GONNA EXPAND THAT TIME PERIOD, UH, TO COVER TONIGHT'S MEETING.

SO, UH, THROUGH SEPTEMBER OF 25 AND LISTED SEVEN RECOMMENDATIONS.

UM, AND THEN ITEM FOUR, LIST THE RECOMMENDATION NUMBERS.

SO WE DID THAT.

UM, WE LISTED OUR SIX RECOMMENDATION NUMBERS.

THOSE COULD BE FOUND ONLINE.

I'M NOT GONNA GO THROUGH THEM ALL HERE TONIGHT.

UH, THOSE ARE ALL PUBLIC RECORD.

AND THEN THE ONE ADDITION I WAS GONNA MAKE WAS THE, UM, THE RECOMMENDATION THAT WE JUST PASSED TONIGHT.

YES.

COMMISSIONER.

SORRY, I'M JUST, I'M LOOKING AT THE ATTACHMENT.

IT'S THE ONE THAT'S NOT FILLED OUT THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT.

RIGHT.

OKAY.

IS THAT, IS THIS SUPPOSED TO BE THE ONE THAT IS FILLED OUT? AM I LOST? UH, YEAH, I BELIEVE I SENT IT TO YOU LAST WEEK RIGHT AFTER THE MEETING.

THAT'S, OH, SORRY.

SO SORRY.

THE ONE THAT WE LOOKED AT LAST TIME, THAT'S THE ONE I WAS THINKING THAT YOU WERE GOING THROUGH THAT'S FILLED OUT.

CORRECT.

AND SO THIS ONE THAT I'M LOOKING AT ISN'T FILLED OUT.

YEAH, THAT'S A MISUNDERSTANDING ON MY PART.

I JUST THOUGHT YOU WANTED ME TO SHARE ALL THE QUESTIONS, NOT THE, THE DOCUMENT.

MY APOLOGIES.

I, I CAN FORWARD THAT.

IT'LL TAKE A SECOND.

[00:55:01]

YEAH, A LOT OF THE SAME INFORMATION IS IN THE MINUTES FROM THE PREVIOUS MEETING, BUT MM-HMM .

UM, WHILE DAN'S DOING THAT, I'M JUST GONNA GO AHEAD AND GO THROUGH THE REST OF IT AND THEN, UM, WE CAN CIRCLE BACK.

UH, THE FIFTH QUESTION, WHICH RECOMMENDATIONS WERE CLOSELY ALIGNED TO THE ORGANIZATION'S CORE MISSION? WE HAD SAID THAT ALL OF THEM ARE CLOSELY ALIGNED, UH, AND ALL WERE COVERED IN THE CONTENT OF OUR BYLAWS.

UM, AND THEN I ACTUALLY WENT THROUGH, UH, WITH, UH, SUPPORT FROM, UH, COMMISSIONER PREVI AND, UH, COMBI AND ACTUALLY WENT THROUGH AND, AND CITED THE, UM, THE SPECIFIC TEXT IN OUR BYLAWS THAT EACH OF THE REC SUBMITTED RECOMMENDATIONS APPLIED TO.

UM, ITEM SIX WAS, WHICH RECOMMENDATIONS? WHICH RECOMMENDATIONS ARE ADJACENT TO THE ORGANIZATION'S CORE MISSION? WE PUT NOT APPLICABLE, UM, SHARE ITEM SEVEN, SHARING ANY FURTHER CONTACTS THAT COULD SUPPORT OR EXPLAIN YOUR RECOMMENDATIONS.

AND WE SAID, ALL ITEMS ARE COVERED WITHIN OUR BYLAWS.

COMPLETED IN COLLABORATION WITH OUR COMMUNITY PARTNERS ALIGNED TO THE 23 DIGITAL NEEDS ASSESSMENTS, AND WE'RE FOCUSED ON IMPROVING CITY INFRASTRUCTURE, FUNDING, CAPACITY ACCESS, EQUITY, AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES.

UM, ITEM A IS ASKING IF THERE'S ANOTHER BODY THAT OVERLAPS IN OUR ROLE, UH, WITH THE WORK OF OUR BOARD OF COMMISSION.

WE SAID NO, THERE ARE ANOTHER OTHER COMMISSIONS THAT OVERLAP WITH OURS.

UH, AND ONE OF THE MAIN BENEFITS OF OUR COMMISSION IS THAT OPERATE SEPARATELY FROM OTHERS.

UH, ALTHOUGH WE MAY COMPLIMENT EACH OTHER, THE SEPARATION OF IMPORTANCE AS WE FOCUS ON CITY TECHNOLOGY POLICY ACCESS, FUNDING, AFFORDABILITY, AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES.

UM, ITEM NINE, WE SAID, UM, DO THE BYLAWS NEED TO BE UPDATED? WE SAID NO.

WE, UH, RECENTLY UPDATED THE COMMISSION BYLAWS IN FEBRUARY OF THIS YEAR.

UM, AND THEN WE, UH, DID A LIKERT SCALE EXERCISE, UM, WHERE IT WAS REQUESTED ON A SCALE OF ONE TO 10, HOW ENGAGED OUR BOARD AND COMMISSION MEMBERS.

WE SAID A NINE BECAUSE ALL SEATS WERE FILLED.

WE'VE ONLY FAILED TO MAKE QUORUM ONCE THIS YEAR.

AND WE RE, WE SCHEDULED A SPECIAL CALLED MEETING TWO WEEKS LATER.

UM, ALL COMMISSION MEMBERS HAVE UNIQUE INTERESTS AND PERSPECTIVES THAT ARE ACTIVELY ENGAGED DURING OUR MEETINGS.

AND THEN, UM, HOW ENGAGED WAS THE COMMUNITY? WE LISTED IT, WE'D LISTED IT AS AN EIGHT, AND WE LISTED THE AI SPECIFIC BILLS THAT HAVE PASSED IN TEXAS, AND THE COMMUNITY IS LOOKING FOR US TO PROVIDE LEADERSHIP.

UH, WE TALKED ABOUT HOW THE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS PARTICIPATED IN OUR AUGUST COMMUNITY IMPACT HEARING WITH LESS THAN ONE WEEK'S NOTICE.

I WAS GONNA ADD AN ITEM UNDER THIS SECTION, UH, CALLING OUT THAT, UM, WE HAD FORMER COMMISSIONERS AND FRIENDS OF THE COMMISSION ALSO, UH, ADVOCATE FOR US DURING TONIGHT'S MEETING.

UM, WE HAD ALSO INDICATED THAT INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS ARE CURRENTLY LOW, BUT WE ANTICIPATE AN INCREASE AS POLICY ISSUES RELATED TO THESE EMERGING TECHNOLOGY ISSUES CONTINUE TO EVOLVE.

AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS ARE ALWAYS VERY ENGAGED, UM, THROUGH COLLABORATION WITH GT OS AS WELL AS DECA.

AND, UM, FINALLY WE DIDN'T SEE ANY, UM, BYLAW REVISIONS ARE NECESSARY AT THIS TIME.

UM, SO I DON'T THINK WE NEED ANOTHER VOTE, SINCE IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO SUBMIT THIS.

AND I THINK 99% OF IT IS, UH, WE WERE ALIGNED ON LAST TIME.

I WAS SIMPLY GONNA ADD THE, THE NEW ITEMS FROM TONIGHT.

SO, UM, UNLESS EVERYONE, ANYONE'S, UM, UH, HAS ANY, UM, CONCERNS ABOUT THAT, THAT'S HOW I'LL MOVE FORWARD.

OKAY, SOUNDS GOOD.

THEN.

WELL, I'LL WORK WITH JAN AND JESSE TO, UH, ALSO GATHER UP THE PRESENTATIONS GIVEN BY THE, UM, OUR, UM, OUR COLLABORATORS AND SUBMIT THOSE TO THE CLERK'S OFFICE AS WELL.

DAN, IF YOU COULD HELP WITH THAT.

UM, SO WITH THAT, WE WILL MOVE TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER.

WE DON'T HAVE, UH, COMMISSIONER PENA VIA HERE.

SO

[6. Artificial Intelligence Working Group updates on AI legislation at the municipal level and the status of the group’s recommendation (Brian AM Williams, District 1 Appointee, Technology Commission)]

WE'LL GO AHEAD AND SKIP AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FIVE AND GO TO GO STRAIGHT TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER SIX, THE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE WORKING GROUP UPDATES.

UH, COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS, I'LL, I'LL TURN IT OVER TO YOU.

ALRIGHT, PERFECT.

THANK YOU.

SO MOST OBVIOUS , WE'RE JUST, UH, DISCUSSING OUR MOST RECENT RECOMMENDATION AND ITS PASSAGE WITH REGARD TO OUR POSITION ON A LPR AND, UH, OTHER RELATED, UH, INSTANCES.

[01:00:01]

UM, THAT IS THE BEGINNING, NOT THE END.

WITH REGARDS TO THE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE WORKING GROUP, THERE ARE SEVERAL THINGS, UH, THAT WILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED OVER TIME THAT, UH, CONCERN OUR CITIZENS IN OUR CITY.

UM, THERE ARE OTHER, UH, AVENUES OF SURVEILLANCE THAT I THINK, UH, WOULD REQUIRE SOME ATTENTION.

SO PRETTY SOON THE WORKING GROUP WILL BE PRESENTING TO THIS BODY.

UM, SOME IDEAS AROUND, UM, SORT OF SECONDARY SURVEILLANCE THAT ISN'T INVOLVED WITH, UH, CITY CONTRACTS.

THERE ARE OTHER WAYS THAT, UH, CITIZENS ARE BEING MASS DATA COLLECTED WHERE THEY HAVE NO SENSE OF RECOURSE OR NO SENSE OF SAFETY OF THAT DATA.

UH, SO WE WANT TO TRY TO RAISE THAT CONCERN WITH THE SAME SPIRIT AND, UM, SORT OF ETHICS OF THIS CURRENT RECOMMENDATION, AS WELL AS SEVERAL OTHER NON SURVEILLANCE, BUT ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RELATED ISSUES, UM, THAT WE HOPE TO BRING TO THIS BODY FOR THEIR CONSIDERATION AS A POTENTIAL RECOMMENDATION.

UM, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IS A BROAD AREA THAT CAN IMPACT, UM, OUR CITIZENS IN VERY POSITIVE AND SOMETIMES VERY NEGATIVE WAYS.

AND WE WANT TO ENCOURAGE THE POSITIVE WHILE MITIGATING THE NEGATIVE AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.

AND THAT'S OUR HOPE, UH, WITH THE WORKING GROUP.

UH, WE WILL BE CONVENING AGAIN, UH, BETWEEN THIS AND THE NEXT MEETING, UH, TO DISCUSS SOME ADDITIONAL TOPICS OF INTEREST.

AND AGAIN, WE'LL BE BRINGING BACK TO THIS BODY AND WE INVITE ALL OF YOU, UM, TO PARTICIPATE AS WELL.

IF YOU ARE INTERESTED.

UM, THE DOOR IS WIDE OPEN FOR ALL OF OUR COMMISSIONERS AND SOME OF OUR SUPPORTERS FROM THE CITY AS WELL.

UM, OUR GOAL IS TO HEAR FROM AS MANY DIFFERENT PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE TO GET THIS RIGHT.

UM, WE, OR AT LEAST I PERSONALLY, AND THIS IS, I'LL SAY MY PERSONAL OPINION, I BELIEVE WE ARE AT A VERY IMPORTANT INFLUX OF TECHNOLOGY.

UM, AND IT IS IMPORTANT THAT AUSTIN IN PARTICULAR, UH, GET THIS RIGHT BECAUSE I KNOW FROM CONVERSATIONS I'VE HAD IN MY TRAVEL AND BUSINESS THAT THERE ARE OTHER MUNICIPALITIES LOOKING AT AUSTIN, UH, FOR WHAT IS AUSTIN THINKING, DOING, OR LOOKING AT WITH REGARDS TO HOW TO ENGAGE THESE TECHNOLOGIES.

UM, AND I WANT US TO PROVIDE A GOOD EXAMPLE BY DOING WHAT WE CONSIDER TO BE THE BEST WAY.

SO THAT IS THE THINKING THAT IS MY PERSONAL ETHOS AS WELL AS THE DIRECTION OF THE SUBGROUP.

AND YOU'LL BE HEARING MUCH MORE, UH, FROM US, AND HOPEFULLY MANY OF YOU'LL PARTICIPATE IN FORMING THE OPINIONS WITH IT.

GREAT.

AND, UM, WHO THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE GROUP, I KNOW IT'S COMMISSIONER PVI, UM, WHO ELSE IS IN THAT WORKING GROUP? MYSELF, UM, MYSELF, DACA WILLIAMS, .

UM, AND WE HAVE OCCASIONALLY KEVIN WILL, UH, COME IN AND LEND AN OPINION TO OUR DIRECTION.

CAN I MAKE THERE HAVE BEEN OTHER PARTICIPANTS AS WELL OVER THE COURSE OF TIME, UH, PARTICULARLY A BUNCH OF AUSTIN CITIZENS FROM DIFFERENT GROUPS.

YEP.

UM, THE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ALLIANCE, UH, THE ONE OF THE FOUNDERS HAS PARTICIPATED IN THE PAST, UH, INDIVIDUAL FROM NEW YORK CITY.

UH, WHAT'S HER LAST NAME? BIANCA, I CAN'T REMEMBER HER LAST NAME, MOM.

BUT SHE, SHE'S A, IN MY OPINION, A BRILLIANT, BRILLIANT GENIUS, UH, WITH REGARD TO TECHNOLOGY AND AI.

AND SHE HAS INFLUENCE IN OTHER SPACES SIMILAR TO WHERE WE PARTICIPATE.

SO YES, THERE'S, UM, THERE ARE, WELL, I GUESS I WOULD CONSIDER MEMBERS AND PARTICIPANTS, UH, WITH REGARD TO THE SUBGROUP.

GO AHEAD.

COMMISSIONER.

HERITAGE, I, I WAS THINKING JUST, UM, COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS, JUST IN LIGHT OF WHAT YOU WERE SHARING, AND I WANTED TO PROPOSE TO THE GROUP ABOUT CONSIDERING CONSOLIDATING THIS PUBLIC SURVEILLANCE INTO ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE WORK GROUP.

'CAUSE I FEEL LIKE THE WORK THAT WE'RE DOING IS STARTING TO, UM, CONSOLIDATE JUST ORGANICALLY.

AND I KNOW KEITH ISN'T HERE, BUT IT'S BRIAN, JUST HEARING YOU TALK THROUGH SOME OF THE THINGS THAT YOU GUYS ARE LOOKING AT.

I'M FEELING LIKE WE'RE REACHING A NEXUS POINT ANYWAYS.

WOULD IT MAKE SENSE IF WE ALIGN OR CONSOLIDATE SOME OF THESE EFFORTS, UM, SINCE THERE SORT OF PART AND PARCEL OF EACH OTHER EITHER WAY.

SO I WANTED TO PUT THAT FORTH TO THE GROUP FOR, FOR FEEDBACK AND DISCUSSION.

WHAT IS THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF PEOPLE THAT CAN BE IN A WORK GROUP? AGAIN, IS THERE LIKE A MAX, YOU SAID QUORUM? SO FIVE LESS THAN QUORUM.

YEAH.

FIVE IS A MAX.

OKAY, COOL.

OR FIVE COMMISSIONERS, CORRECT.

YEAH, WE HAVE CITIZENS, FIVE COMMISSIONERS.

OKAY.

I THINK FOR THIS CONVERSATION, THE PUBLIC SURVEILLANCE WORKING GROUP WOULD BE SMART TO COLLABORATE WITH.

MM-HMM .

UM, AI AND PUBLIC SURVEILLANCE ARE HAND IN HAND, OR AT LEAST THEY CAN BE.

UM, AND THERE ARE ISSUES THERE THAT REQUIRE OUR ATTENTION.

I THINK AI IS GOING TO BE BROADER THAN PUBLIC SURVEILLANCE.

YEAH.

SO I THINK IT WOULD BE SORT OF A CONVERSATION THAT IS, UH, YOU KNOW, ISSUE BY ISSUE OR RECOMMENDATION BY RECOMMENDATION.

BUT I DO THINK IT WILL BE WISE OF US WHEN WE RUN INTO AI AND SURVEILLANCE TYPE OF, UH, ISSUES THAT WE REALLY EMPLOY AS MANY RESOURCES AS WE CAN, INCLUDING THOSE ON THE PUBLIC SURVEILLANCE WORKING GROUP C, COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS, MAYBE.

UM, SOMETHING THAT WE CAN DO IN OUR NEXT AI WORKING GROUP MEETING, UM, THAT COMMISSIONER HERITAGE CAN JOIN AS WELL, IS

[01:05:01]

REALLY THINK ABOUT MAYBE GETTING MORE SPECIFIC WITH SOME OF THE RE THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATIONS OR THE AREAS WE WANNA LOOK AT WHERE, UM, JUST SO THAT WE HAVE MORE MAYBE CLEAR FOCUSED, NOT, I, I JUST DON'T WANNA LUMP EVERYTHING INTO ONE GROUP AND THEN, UH, YEAH.

NOT HAVE AN AGENDA FOR THE RECOMMENDATIONS, UH, THAT WE WANNA GET OUT OF IT, OR HAVE A CLEAR END DATE ACTUALLY FOR ALL OF US TO SAY, OKAY, THIS WORKING GROUP IS WORKING ON THIS PARTICULAR RECOMMENDATION.

OKAY.

SO MAYBE WHAT WE CAN DO IS THAT NEXT MEETING, WE CAN BREAK THOSE THINGS OUT AND THEN JUST CREATE THESE SORT OF MINI, ALMOST MINI WORKING GROUPS, I GUESS.

I DON'T KNOW IF THAT WOULD MAYBE FEEL A LITTLE BETTER.

UM, AND SOME OF THEM COULD, YOU KNOW, UH, HAVE MORE OF A SURVEILLANCE TILT OR MORE OF AN AI TILT OR SOMETHING BLENDED AND, UH, MAYBE THAT WOULDN'T JUST MAKE IT A LITTLE CLEARER FOR US.

YEAH.

SO, UM, DEFINITELY LET'S, UH, I'LL LEAVE IT TO, TO BRIAN.

YOU KNOW, WE CAN DEFINITELY HAVE THAT DISCUSSION AT THE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE WORK GROUP.

IN ADDITION TO THAT, I CAN ADD AN AGENDA ITEM AT OUR NEXT FULL COMMISSION MEETING, UM, TO JUST DO A REVIEW OF OUR, UM, WORKING GROUPS AS THEY STAND TO ADD, MODIFY, CONSOLIDATE, WHATEVER, YOU KNOW, WE WANT TO DO.

UM, BUT THAT WOULD GIVE, UM, PLENTY OF OPPORTUNITY FOR OTHER COMMISSIONERS TO COME PREPARED WITH THEIR THOUGHTS AS WELL.

HOW DO, HOW DOES EVERYONE FEEL ABOUT THAT FAVOR OF THAT? I WAS CURIOUS, I MEAN, YOU'VE TALKED A LOT SO FAR ABOUT AI AND SURVEILLANCE ASPECTS.

UM, WHAT THEMES ARE YOU LOOKING AT AROUND GENERATIVE AI AND PERHAPS THE WAY THE CITY USES THAT? UH, IS THAT A TOPIC YOU'RE PLANNING ON INVESTIGATING? YEAH, WE COULD, UM, THAT HAS, I MEAN, I THINK WE HAVE, IT HAS, IT'S COME UP, UM, AT A, AT A BASIC LEVEL, NOT AT ANY DEPTHFUL LEVEL.

YEAH.

AND, YOU KNOW, THINGS LIKE POLICY CHAIRMAN, AK AND I, I'M SORRY, I WAS JUST SPECIFICALLY LIKE, THE THING THAT CAME TO MIND WAS POLICY AROUND LIKE USING GENERATIVE AI IN PLACES WHERE THE CITY WOULD, YOU KNOW, POTENTIALLY BE HIRING ARTISTS OR WRITERS MM-HMM .

YEAH.

THINGS LIKE THAT.

MM-HMM .

INDEED.

AND OUR APPROACH IN THE PAST, AND THIS IS CHAIRMAN, I FORGOT.

KEEP ME HONEST.

UM, AFTER WE ATTENDED THE CITY TECHNOLOGY EVENTS, UM, EARLIER THIS YEAR, UM, WE LEARNED THAT THERE ARE SEVERAL EFFORTS, UH, HAPPENING AROUND THE CITY WITH REGARD TO HOW AI IS BEING USED IN DAY-TO-DAY OPERATIONS AND WORK.

UM, WHICH KIND OF BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION THAT THERE ISN'T NECESSARILY A STANDARD ACROSS THE CITY.

UM, SO WE DIDN'T NECESSARILY GET TO THE DEPTH OF LEVEL OF SAYING, YOU KNOW, YOU'RE USING GENERATIVE AI THAT HAS AN IMPACT ON CITIZENS CONTRACTS, ARTISTS WHO YOU'RE HIRING AND WHO YOU USED TO HIRE VERSUS WHO YOU WILL HIRE NEXT, OR THINGS OF THAT NATURE.

BUT WE DID, UH, COME ACROSS AN AWARENESS THAT THESE TOOLS ARE BEING USED IN THE CITY, AND THEY'RE BEING USED IN, I GUESS, INCONSISTENT WAYS TO SAY THE MOST BROAD, UH, UNDERSTAND IT.

SO I THINK YOUR CONCERN MAKES SENSE, AND I THINK WE SHOULD DOUBLE CLICK ON THAT AS A BODY.

YEAH.

AND IN ADDITION TO THAT, I WILL SAY THAT THE, THE CITY HAS, DOES HAVE A PRETTY ROBUST POLICY ON, UH, GENERATIVE AI USAGE.

UM, WE, I CAN GET THAT AND SHARE THAT WITH YOU, SHOULD DEFINITELY LIKE REVIEW IT.

UM, BUT I WILL SAY THAT THAT IS OUT THERE AND IT'S PRETTY ROBUST.

DOES THE CITY HAVE A DISCLOSURE POLICY YET WHEN AI IS BEING UTILIZED ON, IN A, IN A PUBLIC FACING WAY? 'CAUSE STATUTORILY THAT WENT INTO EFFECT SEPTEMBER ONE MM-HMM .

OF THIS YEAR.

SO I'M JUST CURIOUS IF THEY'VE, IF THAT'S BEEN ROLLED OUT YET.

THAT IS A GOOD QUESTION.

WE DID HAVE, UM, AN INDIVIDUAL FROM THE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS OFFICE TO UPDATE US LAST TIME, BROADLY ON, UH, THE STATE LEVEL.

UM, BILL AND, UH, HE HAD MENTIONED, AGAIN, BROADLY THAT THE, UH, THAT LEGAL IS GOING THROUGH, UH, TO DETERMINE WHAT CHANGES TO THE POLICY THERE NEEDS TO BE.

SO IF YOU HAVE A SPECIFIC, UH, QUESTION, I'M SURE DAN OR JESSE CAN HELP WITH GETTING THE ANSWER TO THAT.

DO Y'ALL WANT TO MAYBE, MAYBE WE TAKE THAT ONE OFFLINE.

YEAH, YEAH.

OKAY.

DAN, IF YOU COULD TAKE A NOTE FROM THAT.

UM, OKAY.

SO I'LL PUT AN AGENDA ITEM ON THE, UM, FOR NEXT MONTH'S MEETING, UH, TO LOOK AT THE WORKING GROUPS.

AND THEN, UM, SORRY, IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE? GO AHEAD, JESSE.

YEAH, THANKS.

UH, JESSE RODRIGUEZ, AUSTIN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

UM, I JUST WANTED TO, UH, GO AGAIN REALLY QUICK OVER THE REQUIREMENTS OF

[01:10:01]

A WORKING GROUP.

AND I'M SURE THAT WE'LL TALK ABOUT THIS AT THE NEXT MEETING, UH, WITH THIS ITEM THAT YOU'VE PROPOSED.

BUT, UM, UH, EVERY WORKING GROUP SHOULD HAVE A CLEAR OBJECTIVE, UH, AND USUALLY IT RESULTS IN A DELIVERABLE.

SO, YOU KNOW, IF THE RECOMMENDATION THAT WE HAD TODAY COULD BE AN EXAMPLE OF A SOLID DELIVERABLE THAT COULD RESULT IN THE CONCLUSION OF WORKING GROUP, THERE'S NO LIMIT TO THE NUMBER OF WORKING GROUPS YOU HAVE.

SO IF YOU, Y'ALL WANT TO IMMEDIATELY SPIN UP ANOTHER ONE, YOU KNOW, THAT'S TOTALLY FINE.

UM, I WOULD, UH, JUST, UH, ASK, UH, WHAT THE COMMISSION'S INTENT IS FOR, UH, YOU KNOW, THE, JUST MAKE IT CLEAR TO STAFF SO THAT WE KNOW WHAT TO PUT ON THE AGENDAS AND WHAT NOT TO PUT ON THE AGENDAS IF Y'ALL CONSIDER A WORKING GROUP TO BE OFFICIALLY SUNSET OR NOT.

MM-HMM .

UM, AND, UH, THE LAST THING TO KEEP IN MIND IS THAT, UH, IF A NEW WORKING GROUP IS BEING PROPOSED, OR IF Y'ALL PLAN ON HAVING A SPECIFIC WORKING GROUP CREATED, IT WOULD BE GOOD FOR US TO HAVE THAT AS AN INDEPENDENT LINE ITEM ON THE NEXT AGENDA.

UM, SO THAT, UH, THE PUBLIC WOULD HAVE NOTICE OF, YOU KNOW, A SPECIFIC ITEM, UH, THAT Y'ALL ARE CONSIDERING, UH, CREATING A WORKING GROUP AROUND.

OKAY.

THAT'S HELPFUL.

AND, UM, MAYBE WE CAN TAKE THAT UP AS A DISCUSSION ITEM OFFLINE DURING THE AI WORKING GROUP.

BRIAN, HAPPY TO WORK WITH YOU ON, ON SOME OF THAT.

ABSOLUTELY.

YEAH.

AND WE CAN CERTAINLY HAVE THAT TO DAN BEFORE THE NEXT COMMISSION MEETING.

[7. Planning updates from the Digital Equity Listening Session working group (Suzanne Heritage, District 4, Technology Commission)]

GREAT.

UM, SO I'LL MOVE US TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER SEVEN.

UH, SO THAT ONE IS PLANNING UPDATES FROM THE DIGITAL EQUITY LISTENING SESSION.

UH, SUZANNE, WE HAD LISTED YOU AS THE, THE LEAD FOR THIS ONE.

I KNOW YOU HAVEN'T ATTENDED, UH, A MEETING YET.

UM, SO I'LL GIVE THE UPDATE, UH, SO WE HAVEN'T MET AGAIN WITH, UH, THE DISTRICT OFFICES FROM TWO AND THREE, UM, JUST TO GIVE IT'S FRIDAY OR MEETING YEAH, THAT, THAT'S FRIDAY.

SO WE DID HAVE AN ONE INITIAL MEETING, UH, A LITTLE OVER A MONTH AGO.

AND IT WAS JUST LIKE STARTING TO TURN TO BUDGET SEASON, UM, FOR, UH, FOR THE DISTRICT OFFICES.

SO WE HAD AN INITIAL CONVERSATION.

UM, WE SET A TARGET DATE OF FEBRUARY 7TH.

FEBRUARY 7TH, THANK YOU, UH, TO HAVE THAT COMMUNITY LISTING SESSION.

AND THE FIRST PLANNING MEETING IS TAKING PLACE, UH, THIS FRIDAY, UH, WITH THE STAFF FROM, UM, UH, COUNCIL OFFICES TWO AND THREE.

SO, UH, COMMISSIONER HERITAGE, YOU'RE, UH, YOU SHOULD BE ON THAT.

I SEE THAT YOU'VE ACCEPTED.

AND, UH, VICE CHAIR ATA IS ALSO, UH, ATTENDING THAT.

SO, UM, I THINK, UH, WE SHOULD TRY AND CONNECT MAYBE TOMORROW FOR A FEW MINUTES, UH, JUST TO TALK THROUGH SOME INITIAL, UH, IDEAS AROUND THE FORMAT.

UH, BUT WE'LL BE ABLE TO, UM, GIVE A, A, A BETTER UPDATE TO, UM, THE COMMISSION, UM, DURING OUR OCTOBER MEETING WHEN WE HAVE MET WITH THE, UM, THE COUNCIL OFFICES.

UM, SUSAN, DO YOU HAVE ANY, ANY OTHER INITIAL THOUGHTS ON THAT? I KNOW YOU HAVEN'T ATTENDED A MEETING YET OR ANYTHING, BUT YEAH.

OPPORTUNITY, I THINK, UM, ONE OF THE THINGS WE WANTED TO PROPOSE, OR I THINK THE SPIRIT BEHIND THIS IS THAT IN OUR WORK PLAN THAT WE ALL WORKED THROUGH, MAY I WANNA SAY, UM, WE HAD SUGGESTED, YOU KNOW, ONE, OR I THINK WE SAID ONE LISTENING SESSION AS A COMMISSION ESSENTIALLY.

AND SO WHAT'S NICE IS THAT, UH, DISTRICT TWO AND THREE ACTUALLY STEPPED UP AND SAID, YOU KNOW, HEY, FUNNY YOU SHOULD SAY THAT.

WE ACTUALLY HAVE BEEN THINKING SOMETHING SIMILAR.

SO THIS IS SORT OF FEEDING TWO BIRDS WITH ONE SCONE, IF YOU WILL, UH, IN TERMS OF WHAT THEIR HOPES ARE AND WHAT WE'RE AIMING TO DO.

AND SO WE SHOULD BE IRONING OUT CONTENT, UM, SORT OF FORMAT, IS IT FACILITATOR LED? UM, AND THEN REALLY KIND OF KEEPING, ARE WE TALKING ABOUT AFFORDABILITY? ARE WE TALKING ABOUT ACCESS? ARE WE TALKING ABOUT, UM, COVERAGE? AND SO I THINK THOSE ARE SOME THINGS THAT WE'LL IRON OUT A LITTLE BIT MORE ON FRIDAY.

BUT THE GOOD NEWS IS, IS THAT, AGAIN, IN DOING THIS, THIS SHOULD MEET SOME OF OUR GOALS THAT WE HAVE ON OUR WORK PLAN LINED UP.

YEP.

AND IF ANY OTHER COMMISSIONERS ARE INTERESTED IN HELPING WITH THE PLANNING AND EXECUTION OF THE EVENT, UM, JUST LET ME KNOW AND WE CAN GET YOU ADDED TO THE MEETING.

AND IT COULD BE SOMETHING I WOULD LOVE TO SHARE THE LEARNINGS FROM THAT TOO, IF THIS IS SOMETHING THAT OTHER, YOU KNOW, AS WE LAY IT OUT, AS WE KIND OF MOVE FROM PLANNING TO, TO OPERATIONS OF IT, IF THIS IS SOMETHING WE TEMPLATIZE FOR OTHER DISTRICTS TOO.

UM, SO I DO WANNA SHARE THAT IF THERE'S A PLAYBOOK THAT WE CAN SHARE WITH YOU GUYS ON, YOU KNOW, PLANNING WITH

[01:15:01]

WHOEVER YOUR CONSTITUENTS ARE, OR EXCUSE ME, YOUR, UM, LIAISON IS, UM, HAPPY TO, TO SHARE WHAT THAT PLAYBOOK LOOKS LIKE WHEN WE'RE DONE PLANNING IT.

YEAH, THAT'S A GOOD CALL.

UM, SUZANNE, MAYBE, YOU KNOW, I WAS THINKING OUR DELIVERABLE TO CLOSE OUT THIS WORKING GROUP WOULD BE A REPORT OUT TO THE COMMISSION ON, UM, OUR LEARNINGS, NOTES, INSIGHTS.

BUT I THINK YOU BRING UP A GOOD POINT, LIKE HOW, HOW WE EXECUTED THE PLANNING OF THE EVENT I THINK WOULD HELP OTHERS AS WELL.

YEAH.

HAPPY TO WORK ON THAT.

SO THANK YOU FOR THAT.

OKAY.

UM, SO THAT'S THE UPDATE, UM, FOR THAT.

[FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS]

UH, SO MOVING INTO FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS, UM, ANYTHING, ANYTHING FOR OCTOBER THAT IS A STANDING AGENDA ITEM? LOOKS LIKE THERE IS.

YES.

UM, SO THE CALENDAR FOR THE UPCOMING YEAR IS GONNA BE DUE, UH, AT THE END OF NOVEMBER.

BUT JUST TO AVOID ANY ISSUES WITH, UH, QUORUMS OR NOT BEING ABLE TO MEET, MAKE A MEETING, UM, LAST YEAR, Y'ALL, Y'ALL DECIDED TO MOVE IT UP BY MONTH.

UH, SO NEXT YEAR WE HAVE A CALENDAR, UM, TO APPROVE.

UH, I'LL GO AHEAD AND HAVE A DRAFT AND, AND CHAIR UP A DACA INBOX, UH, AHEAD OF THE MEETING.

BUT, UM, UH, THAT CALENDAR'S JUST GONNA HAVE DATES.

UH, IT'S NOT GONNA REALLY SHOW THE OUTLINES OF WHAT THIS GROUP IS GONNA BE DOING.

THAT'S A MORE SPECIFIED CALENDAR.

WE'RE JUST WORKING ON THE ONE THAT YOU NEED TO SUBMIT TO THE CLERK'S OFFICE.

UM, BUT ON TOP OF THAT, UH, WE ALSO, THE G TOPS IMPROVEMENT PLAN, WE HOPE TO HAVE THAT FOR THE UPCOMING MEETING.

WE WEREN'T ABLE TO HAVE IT READY FOR THIS MEETING.

UH, 'CAUSE WE STILL NEED SOME, UH, HIGHER UP LEADERSHIP APPROVAL.

UH, BUT IT IS SCHEDULED FOR THE UPCOMING ONE.

UM, AND I HAVE A FEW OTHER REMINDERS AFTER THIS.

YEAH.

OKAY.

GREAT.

DID YOU WANNA SHOOT TO HAVE THE ISPS COME TO THE OCTOBER MEETING? YEAH, THAT WOULD BE GREAT IF YOU COULD ASSIST WITH THAT.

SHOULD WE, SHOULD WE DO THAT? I WAS ACTUALLY THINKING THAT WE PUSHED THAT TO NOVEMBER AND THE ONLY REASON I SAY THAT IS, UM, OCTOBER IS DIGITAL INCLUSION WEEK.

MM-HMM .

AND OUR MEETING IS ON, IS DURING DIGITAL INCLUSION WEEK.

AND SO I'M WONDERING IF WE KEEP, I'M JUST LOOKING AT THE DATES THAT WE HAD TALKED ABOUT BEFORE, IF NOVEMBER WAS BROADBAND AND FOR EQUITY AND AFFORDABILITY, IF THAT WOULD MAKE MORE SENSE FOR SERVICE PROVIDERS.

AND THEN OCTOBER WE KEEP AS MORE OF THAT GTOP UPDATE FROM G TOPS.

AND THEN I THINK I'VE GOT SOME OUTREACH TO DIGITAL LIFT AS WELL TO COME AND PRESENT SOMETHING TO KEEP ON BRAND OR ON THEME WITH THE, THE WEEK.

MM-HMM .

I WILL ASK THE ISPS WHICH DATE THEY PREFER.

YEAH.

YEAH.

I MEAN IT, LOOK, IF THEY'RE NOT ABLE TO MAKE NOVEMBER OCTOBER'S IS AN OPTION AS WELL.

I THINK WE CAN DO, I THINK WE CAN DO IT ALL.

UM, YOU KNOW, IF MAYBE WE HAVE ONE ISP IN OCTOBER AND ANOTHER IN NOVEMBER AND WE'RE STILL ABLE TO DO THE G TOPS WORK.

YEAH.

HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT THAT, SUZANNE, THOUGH? IT GIVES MORE, SOME FLEXIBILITY.

I, I THINK THAT'S FINE.

I THINK IT'S JUST BEING CLEAR LIKE WHEN WE THINK, WHAT ARE WE INTERESTED IN THE SERVICE PROVIDERS PRESENTING ON? EXACTLY.

UM, SO I HAD GIVEN THE DIRECTION TO COMMISSIONER EASTWOOD ON, UM, I'M PARTICULARLY INTERESTED, INTERESTED, INTERESTED TO HEAR, UH, ON THEIR, THEIR AFFORDABILITY STRATEGY POST, UH, THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT, UM, WHAT WORK THEY'RE DOING TO, UM, ENGAGE WITH THE COMMUNITY, UM, AROUND THOSE ITEMS. SO SPECIFICALLY THOSE, BUT THEY'RE ALSO MIGHT, I MEAN, THEY MIGHT BE DOING OTHER WORK THAT WE'RE NOT AWARE OF.

UM, BUT THOSE ARE THE THINGS THAT ARE TOP OF MIND FOR ME.

UM, WHAT ARE THEY DOING POST A CA TO, UM, ENSURE THAT THEIR PLANTS ARE AFFORDABLE, ESPECIALLY FOR UNDERSERVED POPULATIONS, UM, IN AND AROUND NOT ONLY AUSTIN, BUT CENTRAL, THE CENTRAL TEXAS REGION.

MM-HMM .

I THINK, UM, I MENTIONED THIS IN MAY.

I THINK THE MOBILITY COVERAGE PIECE IS GONNA BE BIG TOO.

JUST BECAUSE IF YOU CAN'T AFFORD, UM, WIRE LINE DATA, THEN MOBILITY IS WHAT YOU'RE GONNA NEED.

AND IF YOU DON'T HAVE ACCESS TO THAT OR IF THE COVERAGE ISN'T GREAT IN YOUR AREA, THAT'S GONNA BE AN ISSUE TO ACCESS THAT.

SO I WOULD BE CURIOUS, AND I'M NOT SURE IF IT'S AN ISP THING OR CARRIER THING, BUT DEPENDING ON THE ISP, I DO THINK THAT WOULD BE AN INTERESTING THING.

IF THEY COULD, IF ANY OF THEM DO OFFER BUNDLED SERVICE, IF THEY CAN TALK ABOUT, UM, PLACES THAT THEY'RE TRYING TO BUILD OUT FROM MOBILITY COVERAGE, EITHER KNOWN AREAS WHERE THERE'S SOME CHALLENGES AND THEN AREAS THAT THEY'RE LOOKING TO EXPAND, THAT WOULD BE NICE TO KNOW.

YEAH.

SO, UM, YEAH, IF YOU WANT TO GIVE THEM A HEADS UP, UH, THAT WAY THEY'RE PREPARED.

'CAUSE I'M SURE, UH, UH, I'M SURE SUZANNE, UM,

[01:20:01]

WILL BE DANGEROUS WITH THE QUESTIONS WHEN WE DO HAVE THEM HAVE THEM ON .

SO LOOKING FORWARD TO THAT .

GREAT.

UH, ANY OTHER FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS? OKAY, WELL, I THINK WE, AT THE VERY LEAST, WE HAVE A PLAN FOR, UH, FOR NEXT MONTH.

UM,

[1. Approve the minutes of the Technology Commission meeting on August 13th, 2025.]

I'M GONNA MOVE US BACKWARDS TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER ONE.

AND THAT'S TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM AUGUST 13TH.

UM, IF EVERYONE WOULD LIKE TO TAKE A FINAL LOOK AT THOSE, AND IF EVERYONE IS GOOD WITH THOSE MINUTES, I, I'LL ACCEPT A MOTION TO APPROVE THEM AS PRESENTED.

SO MOVED, PUT FORWARD BY COMMISSIONER EASTWOOD.

DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND, SECOND.

DID I WIN THIS TIME? YOU DID NOT.

COMMISSIONER COMBY A SECOND.

NEXT TIME.

NEXT TIME.

UM, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF APPROVING THE MINUTES AS PRESENTED, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND, SAY AYE.

AYE.

AYE.

A OH, DO WE HAVE, AYE.

YEAH, WE'RE GOOD.

UM, ANY ABSTENTIONS? ANYONE AGAINST? DOESN'T SOUND LIKE IT.

OKAY.

WE ARE APPROVED.

SO WITH THAT, UM, I WILL SAY THAT WE ARE ADJOURNED.

THANK YOU EVERYONE FOR UH, YOUR SERVICE.