C15-2012-0126 Nuria Zaragoza 1917 David Street The appellant (Nuria Zaragosa) has filed an appeal, requesting an interpretation of whether the Planning and Development Department Director’s determination to approve the proposed duplex residential use at 1917 David Street complies with the following code sections: 1.) The appellant feels the correct interpretation is with ten (10) bedrooms, the project exceeds the Land Development Code (LDC) limitations placed on duplexes outlined on 25-2-555D 2.) The appellant feels the correct interpretation is with 10 bedrooms, the project is required eight (8) parking spaces. 3.) The appellant feels the correct interpretation is with ten (10) bedrooms, the project needs to comply with the landscaping requirements. 4.) The appellant feels the correct interpretation of the actual use is Group Residential as defined in the LDC 25-2-3(5).
C15-2012-0126 Nuria Zaragoza 1917 David Street The appellant (Nuria Zaragosa) has filed an appeal, requesting an interpretation of whether the Planning and Development Department Director’s determination to approve the proposed duplex residential use at 1917 David Street complies with the following code sections: 1.) The appellant feels the correct interpretation is with ten (10) bedrooms, the project exceeds the Land Development Code (LDC) limitations placed on duplexes outlined on 25-2-555D 2.) The appellant feels the correct interpretation is with 10 bedrooms, the project is required eight (8) parking spaces. 3.) The appellant feels the correct interpretation is with ten (10) bedrooms, the project needs to comply with the landscaping requirements. 4.) The appellant feels the correct interpretation of the actual use is Group Residential as defined in the LDC 25-2-3(5).
C15-2012-0126 Nuria Zaragoza 1917 David Street The appellant (Nuria Zaragosa) has filed an appeal, requesting an interpretation of whether the Planning and Development Department Director’s determination to approve the proposed duplex residential use at 1917 David Street complies with the following code sections: 1.) The appellant feels the correct interpretation is with ten (10) bedrooms, the project exceeds the Land Development Code (LDC) limitations placed on duplexes outlined on 25-2-555D 2.) The appellant feels the correct interpretation is with 10 bedrooms, the project is required eight (8) parking spaces. 3.) The appellant feels the correct interpretation is with ten (10) bedrooms, the project needs to comply with the landscaping requirements. 4.) The appellant feels the correct interpretation of the actual use is Group Residential as defined in the LDC 25-2-3(5).
C15-2012-0126 Nuria Zaragoza 1917 David Street The appellant (Nuria Zaragosa) has filed an appeal, requesting an interpretation of whether the Planning and Development Department Director’s determination to approve the proposed duplex residential use at 1917 David Street complies with the following code sections: 1.) The appellant feels the correct interpretation is with ten (10) bedrooms, the project exceeds the Land Development Code (LDC) limitations placed on duplexes outlined on 25-2-555D 2.) The appellant feels the correct interpretation is with 10 bedrooms, the project is required eight (8) parking spaces. 3.) The appellant feels the correct interpretation is with ten (10) bedrooms, the project needs to comply with the landscaping requirements. 4.) The appellant feels the correct interpretation of the actual use is Group Residential as defined in the LDC 25-2-3(5).