CALL TO ORDER 25-1-191 - CONDUCT OF PUBLIC HEARING. A public hearing on an appeal shall proceed in the following order: (1) a report from City staff (10 minutes); (2) a presentation by the appellant (10 minutes); (3) comment by persons supporting the appeal (must be part of above 10 minutes unless additional time is granted by the Chair/Board); (4) comment by persons opposing the appeal (10 minutes); and (5) a rebuttal by the appellant (5 minutes).
C15-2014-0144 Mat Gorman for Katie Van Dyk The appellant has filed an appeal challenging the Planning & Development Review Department’s decision that the Land Use Determination for Group Home, Class 1 is more appropriate than Residential Treatment for the use proposed which includes greater than 15 residents.
A-2 C15-2014-0145 Mo Harry and Stephanie Garrett for Crossfit Central 6205 A Burnet Road The appellant has filed an appeal challenging the Planning and Development review Department’s decision that the Land Use Determination for Personal Improvement Services is more appropriate than Outdoor Sports and Recreation for the use at this site. A-3 C15-2014-0146 Mo Harry and Stephanie Garrett for BVM Crossfit 6711 Burnet Lane The appellant has filed an appeal challenging the Planning and Development review Department’s decision that the Land Use Determination for Personal Improvement Services is more appropriate than Outdoor Sports and Recreation for the use at this site.
A-2 C15-2014-0145 Mo Harry and Stephanie Garrett for Crossfit Central 6205 A Burnet Road The appellant has filed an appeal challenging the Planning and Development review Department’s decision that the Land Use Determination for Personal Improvement Services is more appropriate than Outdoor Sports and Recreation for the use at this site. A-3 C15-2014-0146 Mo Harry and Stephanie Garrett for BVM Crossfit 6711 Burnet Lane The appellant has filed an appeal challenging the Planning and Development review Department’s decision that the Land Use Determination for Personal Improvement Services is more appropriate than Outdoor Sports and Recreation for the use at this site.
A-2 C15-2014-0145 Mo Harry and Stephanie Garrett for Crossfit Central 6205 A Burnet Road The appellant has filed an appeal challenging the Planning and Development review Department’s decision that the Land Use Determination for Personal Improvement Services is more appropriate than Outdoor Sports and Recreation for the use at this site. A-3 C15-2014-0146 Mo Harry and Stephanie Garrett for BVM Crossfit 6711 Burnet Lane The appellant has filed an appeal challenging the Planning and Development review Department’s decision that the Land Use Determination for Personal Improvement Services is more appropriate than Outdoor Sports and Recreation for the use at this site.
Oct 27, 2014 Special Board of Adjustment
CALL TO ORDER 25-1-191 - CONDUCT OF PUBLIC HEARING. A public hearing on an appeal shall proceed in the following order: (1) a report from City staff (10 minutes); (2) a presentation by the appellant (10 minutes); (3) comment by persons supporting the appeal (must be part of above 10 minutes unless additional time is granted by the Chair/Board); (4) comment by persons opposing the appeal (10 minutes); and (5) a rebuttal by the appellant (5 minutes).
C15-2014-0144 Mat Gorman for Katie Van Dyk The appellant has filed an appeal challenging the Planning & Development Review Department’s decision that the Land Use Determination for Group Home, Class 1 is more appropriate than Residential Treatment for the use proposed which includes greater than 15 residents.
A-2 C15-2014-0145 Mo Harry and Stephanie Garrett for Crossfit Central 6205 A Burnet Road The appellant has filed an appeal challenging the Planning and Development review Department’s decision that the Land Use Determination for Personal Improvement Services is more appropriate than Outdoor Sports and Recreation for the use at this site. A-3 C15-2014-0146 Mo Harry and Stephanie Garrett for BVM Crossfit 6711 Burnet Lane The appellant has filed an appeal challenging the Planning and Development review Department’s decision that the Land Use Determination for Personal Improvement Services is more appropriate than Outdoor Sports and Recreation for the use at this site.
A-2 C15-2014-0145 Mo Harry and Stephanie Garrett for Crossfit Central 6205 A Burnet Road The appellant has filed an appeal challenging the Planning and Development review Department’s decision that the Land Use Determination for Personal Improvement Services is more appropriate than Outdoor Sports and Recreation for the use at this site. A-3 C15-2014-0146 Mo Harry and Stephanie Garrett for BVM Crossfit 6711 Burnet Lane The appellant has filed an appeal challenging the Planning and Development review Department’s decision that the Land Use Determination for Personal Improvement Services is more appropriate than Outdoor Sports and Recreation for the use at this site.
A-2 C15-2014-0145 Mo Harry and Stephanie Garrett for Crossfit Central 6205 A Burnet Road The appellant has filed an appeal challenging the Planning and Development review Department’s decision that the Land Use Determination for Personal Improvement Services is more appropriate than Outdoor Sports and Recreation for the use at this site. A-3 C15-2014-0146 Mo Harry and Stephanie Garrett for BVM Crossfit 6711 Burnet Lane The appellant has filed an appeal challenging the Planning and Development review Department’s decision that the Land Use Determination for Personal Improvement Services is more appropriate than Outdoor Sports and Recreation for the use at this site.