Link

Social

Embed

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[00:00:13]

UM, DOES THAT MEAN I CAN CALL US TO ORDER? YES, SIR.

OKAY.

UM,

[Reading of the Agenda]

LIKE COSTA OR I'D LIKE TO APOLOGIZE TO EVERYBODY FOR THE DELAY.

WE HAD SOME IT ISSUES HERE IN THE, UH, IN THE CHAIR'S HOUSEHOLD.

UM, SO, UH, CALLING THE MEETING TO ORDER AND THEN GOING, UM, INTO THE CONSENT AGENDA.

UM, SO THE CONTINUED AGENDA IS A APPROVAL OF MINUTES, B ONE.

UM, AND WE HAVE A LOT OF POSTPONEMENTS HERE.

SO, UH, SO, SO THROUGH THIS WITH ME FOLKS AND EVERYBODY LISTENING ON, ON THE LINE, UM, PLEASE PAY ATTENTION TO THE POSTPONEMENTS.

MOST OF THESE CASES THAT I THINK PEOPLE ARE HERE FOR GETTING POSTPONED, UM, OR, UH, OR GETTING PUT ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.

SO ITEM B ONE, WHICH IS, UH, C 14 2020 ZERO ZERO TWO NINE, MONTOPOLIS ACRES, REZONING DISTRICT THREE, UH, 10, 13 AND 10 17 MONTOPOLIS DRIVE HAS BEEN POSTPONED.

UM, MR. THAT'S A STAFF INDEFINITE POSTPONEMENT, UM, ITEM NUMBER B TO C 1420 2030 ZERO ZERO THREE ZERO DASH 200 AND TOPLESS REZONING DISTRICT THREE.

THAT'S A 200 MONTOPOLIS DRIVE AND 62 OH EIGHT CLOVIS STREET THAT HAS BEEN POSTPONED AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT UNTIL JULY 28TH.

UH, OR THAT'S WHAT WE'RE PUTTING IT UP FOR IN THE AGENDA HERE.

UH, B3 ITEMS, UH, C 14 2020 ZERO ZERO THREE NINE CLOVIS AND KEMP REZONE AT D TWO ZERO ONE CLOVIS STREET AND THREE ZERO ONE KENT STREET.

UM, THAT ITEM IS REQUESTED FOR POSTPONEMENT BY THE APPLICANT UNTIL JULY 28TH, ITEM D FOUR, WHICH IS C 14 2020 ZERO ZERO FOUR FOR SEX AND ACRES, RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT THREE.

THAT'S A THREE 16 SAXON LANE AND 63, TWO EIGHT EL MIRANDO STREET, UH, HAS, UH, APPLICANT IS REQUESTING POSTPONE UNTIL JULY 28TH ITEM , BUT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO HAVE JUST ONE SECOND PLACE.

OH, OKAY.

STEPH, JUST LET ME KNOW WHEN YOU'RE READY.

OKAY.

WELCOME EVERYBODY.

SECOND TRY PLANNING COMMISSION SIX 17 CALLING TO ORDER.

UH, WE HAVE A QUORUM.

UM, I WANT TO REMIND EVERYBODY THAT, UH, YOU ARE MUTED AND YOU CAN COME OFF MUTE WITH STAR SIX, BUT PLEASE DON'T COME OFF MUTE UNTIL YOUR NAME IS CALLED SO THAT WE CAN HAVE SOME ORDER.

UM, ALRIGHT, WE'RE GOING TO GO INTO THE AGENDA.

NOW WE'RE GOING TO READ THE, UH, THE CONSENT AGENDA.

SO WE'RE GOING TO READ THROUGH EACH OF THESE ITEMS, UM, THAT ARE PUT UP FOR CONSENT AND WHAT THE ACTION IS BEING PROPOSED FOR CONSENT.

UM, AND THEN WE'LL HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR ANYBODY WHO'S ON THE LINE WHO WANTS TO SPEAK, UM, ON, UH, THE CONSENT ITEMS AT THE END AND WHETHER OR NOT THEY SHOULD BE ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.

UH, IF YOU, UM, UH, WANT TO SPEAK TO HAVING THE, UH, THE COMMISSION ACTUALLY CONSIDER THE ACTIONS, UM, THEN THAT IS THE TIME TO SPEAK ON IT.

UH, HOWEVER, UH, AT THAT TIME WE DON'T DISCUSS THE MERITS OF THE INDIVIDUAL CASE.

IF IT'S ON THE CONSENT AGENDA, UM, WE NEED TO PULL IT OFF CONSENT AND PUT IT ON TO DISCUSSION IF WE WANT TO DISCUSS THE MERITS OF THE CASE.

SO NOW I'M GOING TO READ THROUGH ALL OF THE ITEMS THAT WE WERE PUTTING ON THE CONSENT AGENDA, WHICH, UM, AS A REMINDER, ANY COMMISSIONER CAN PULL OFF.

SO STARTING WITH ITEM APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM THE JUNE 26, 2020 MEETING, UM, THEN GETTING ONTO BE PUBLIC HEARINGS, ITEM B ONE, WHICH IS C 14, 2020 ZERO ZERO TWO NINE AT, UH, MONTOPOLIS ACRES, REZONING DISTRICT THREE, THAT IS AT 10, 13 AND 10 17.

AND ON TOP OF THIS DRIVE, UM, THAT ITEM IS INDEFINITELY POSTPONED AT THE REQUEST OF STAFF OR STEPS PROPOSING AN INDEFINITE POSTPONEMENT ITEM B TWO, WHICH IS C 14 2020 ZERO ZERO THREE ZERO 200 AND TOPLESS REZONING DISTRICT THREE AT 200 MONTOPOLIS DRIVE AND 62 OH EIGHT CLOVIS

[00:05:01]

STREET.

UH, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A POSTPONEMENT UNTIL JULY 28TH, ITEM B3 SEE 14 2020 ZERO, ZERO THREE NINE CLOVIS AND KIM PRE ZONE DISTRICT THREE AT 62 OH ONE CLOVIS STREET AND THREE OH ONE KIM STREET.

THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A POSTPONE UNTIL JULY 28 ITEM BEFORE A REZONING C 14 2020 ZERO ZERO FOUR FOR SEX AND ACRES, RESIDENTIAL REZONING DISTRICT THREE, THAT IS AT THREE 16 SAXON LANE AND 63 28 EL MORANDO STREET.

UH, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING POSTPONEMENT UNTIL JULY 28, ITEM B FIVE EAST MLK REZONING DISTRICT ONE AT 52 OH ONE EAST MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BOULEVARD.

UH, THE APPLICANT IS AMENDING THEIR REQUEST DOWN TO THE AMF THREE, WHICH IS THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION.

I'M SORRY, THAT ITEM IS POSTED FOR DISCUSSION.

I'M GOING TO, SINCE THEY'RE GOING WITH THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION, I'M GOING TO PROPOSE THAT WE PUT IT ON CONSENT UNLESS SOMEBODY WANTS TO PULL IT.

UM, AND B SIX, A NPA 2019 ZERO ZERO ONE SEVEN.ZERO ONE, UM, SEVEN ONE ONE THREE BURNET.

UM, THAT IS A DISCUSSION CASE, A LINKED ITEM B SEVEN C 1472 ZERO THREE TWO RCT SEVEN ONE ONE THREE BURNETTE ROAD, DISTRICT SEVEN, UM, AT SEVEN ONE THREE BURNET ROAD THAT IS POSTED FOR DISCUSSION ITEM C 14 2020 ZERO ZERO ONE SIX AT SEVEN ONE ONE THREE BURNETT ROAD.

UM, IS, UH, ANOTHER LINKEDIN CASE IS POSTED FOR DISCUSSION, UM, ITEM B NINE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN AMENDMENT 2016, ZERO ZERO ONE TWO.ZERO ONE SH KNUCKLES CROSSING ROAD, SMART HOUSING DISTRICT TWO AS A 4,400 KNUCKLES CROSSING THE ROAD.

UM, THAT IS A, UH, WE'RE ACTUALLY GOING TO PUT THAT ON CONSENT FOR TONIGHT.

UM, ITEM A B T, WHICH IS LINKED TO THAT.

SEE 14 ZERO 2017 ZERO ONE ZERO SH KNUCKLES CROSSING ROADS SMART HOUSING DISTRICT TWO AT 4,400, UH, KNUCKLES CROSSING ROAD IS, UM, FOR DISCUSSIONS TONIGHT.

UM, ITEM NUMBER B 11, NPA 2018 ZERO ZERO ZERO FIVE.ZERO TWO, MARY BY STATES PUD, LOT 27 AMENDMENT ONE DISTRICT THREE, UM, WHICH IS AT 63 OH ONE CIRCULO DE ON A STUD IS, UM, UH, POSTPONED INDEFINITELY AT REQUEST OF STAFF ITEM B12 LINKED ITEMS. SEE EIGHT ONE FOUR DASH NINE SEVEN DASH ZERO ZERO ZERO TWO DOT OH ONE, MARRIED BY STATES POD, LOT 27 AMENDMENT ONE DISTRICT THREE AT 63 OH ONE CIRCULO DE ON A STUD.

HIS STAFF IS REQUESTING INDEFINITE POSTPONEMENT ITEM B 13, UH, NPA 2019 ZERO ZERO ONE THREE.ZERO ONE COPELAND SOUTH DISTRICT NINE AT NINE OH ONE NINE 11 NINE NINE 15, 1001, 1003 SECOND STREET AND SIX OH FOUR AND SIX OH SIX COPELAND'S UM, A STEP OR THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING AND DEFINITELY POSTPONEMENT ITEM C 14, UH, WHICH IS OUR , WHICH IS C 14 2020 ZERO ZERO FIVE SIX WICKERSHAM RETAIL CENTER DISTRICT THREE AT FOUR FIVE FOUR FOUR EAST OLTORF STREET HAS, UM, A REQUEST FOR POSTPONEMENT AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT, UM, OR AT THE REQUEST OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD UNTIL JULY 28TH.

UM, ITEM BEEF, 15 SPC 2019 ZERO FIVE NINE ZERO EIGHT AT 76 RAINY STREET CUP DISTRICT NINE AT 76 RAINY STREET.

UM, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A POSTPONEMENT UNTIL AUGUST 25TH.

UM, ITEM B 16 S P 2019 ZERO FIVE EIGHT NINE.

SEE COLOR FIELD DISTRICT NINE, WHICH IS 1006 BAYLOR STREET.

UH, THAT ITEM IS POSTED FOR CONSENT OR APPROVAL FOR THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION ITEM B 17 SITE PLAN S P 2019 ZERO TWO FIVE THREE C AT SPRINGDALE FARMS DISTRICT THREE IT'S SEVEN FIVE FIVE SPRINGDALE ROAD, BOGGY CREEK WATERSHED, UM, IS POSTED FOR DISCUSSION ITEM B 18 S P 2019 ZERO FIVE FIVE NINE.

SEE WEST SEVENTH STREET, PASSIVE DISTRICT NINE.

UM, THAT IS A ONE ONE ONE EIGHT WEST SEVENTH STREET THAT IS POSTED FOR CONSENT APPROVAL OF THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION ITEM B 19 SPC 2012, UH, ZERO ONE ZERO FOUR D R FOR ZILKER MAINTENANCE BARN, DISTRICT EIGHT AT TWO THREE, THREE EIGHT.

COLUMBUS DRIVE IS POSTED FOR CONSENT APPROVAL OF THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION.

I'M GUESSING THAT'S NOBODY JUMPING IN.

I'M GOING TO KEEP READING HERE.

ITEM B 20 A RE SUBDIVISION WITH A FLAG LOT VARIANTS THAT'S UNDER THEM.

OOH, SOMEBODY IS OFF MUTE.

UH,

[00:10:02]

JERICO SUBDIVISION DISTRICT THREE.

THAT IS AT THREE FOUR ZERO NINE NEIL STREET.

UM, THAT IS CONSENT APPROVAL OF THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND ITEM B 21.

UH, I'M SORRY THAT, UH, THAT ONE IS UP FOR DISCUSSION.

SO I'M JUST GOING TO RUN THROUGH REAL QUICK.

UM, AND, UH, UH, MR. BEAR, ARE YOU ON THE LINE CHAIR, COMMISSIONER, LADIES ON ANDREW RIVERA.

UH, I HAVE A REQUEST FROM THE APPLICANT TO, UM, HEAR THE KNUCKLES CROSSING CASE TONIGHT.

UM, THAT REQUEST IS A COUPLE OF MINUTES OLD.

UH, THAT'S WHY I PUT THAT ON DISCUSSION.

IS THAT NEWER CONTRARY TO YOUR INFORMATION? I'M SURE THERE'S A POSTPONEMENT REQUEST BY THE NEIGHBORHOOD CONTACT HIM.

UH, OKAY, SO THAT ONE THEN, UM, WE ARE GOING TO HAVE AS A DISCUSSION POSTPONEMENT.

UM, MR. SEEGER, YOU RAISED YOUR HAND.

GO AHEAD.

YES, THEY DID.

I HAVE A QUESTION ON FIVE EAST MLK.

YES.

THIS QUESTION IS, IS ANYONE SIGNED UP TO DISCUSS? YES, THERE ARE THOSE SIGNED UP IN OPPOSITION.

UM, HOWEVER I SUSPECT THEY MIGHT BE SIGNED UP FOR THE, UM, UH, THE, UH, ORIGINAL APPLICATION, THE MF SIX THAT HAS BEEN AMENDED.

I'M GOING TO GIVE EVERYBODY, UH, WHO WANTS TO HAVE A CHANCE TO DISCUSS, UH, WHO'S ON THE LINE TO SPEAK, UH, ON THIS AGENDA AT THE END.

SO IF FOLKS DO STILL WANT TO DISCUSS IT, UM, UH, WE CAN HEAR FROM THEM, UH, IN JUST A MINUTE HERE.

YES.

I WOULD LIKE TO PULL UP THEN TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE, OKAY, WELL, WE'LL PULL THAT ONE FOR DISCUSSION.

ALL RIGHT.

I'M GOING TO RUN THROUGH THIS REAL QUICK.

UM, SO ITEMS, UH, YES.

CAN I GET A CLARIFICATION ON THE KNUCKLES PASSING? YES.

SO THAT IS ONE WHERE THE NEIGHBORHOOD HAS REQUESTED A POSTPONEMENT.

THE APPLICANT DOES NOT AGREE.

UM, SO WE ARE GOING TO HAVE, UH, THAT FOR DISCUSSION POSTPONEMENT.

UM, WE'LL HAVE A DISCUSSION AND DEBATE AND THEN VOTE ON WHETHER OR NOT TO POSTPONEMENT AND THEN IF WE DON'T POSTPONE IT, WE'LL HEAR THE FULL CASE.

OKAY.

OKAY.

SO CALL IN FOR THAT.

WHERE WOULD THEY BE ABLE TO AT THIS POINT? UM, I GUESS I SHOULD ASK, WAS THIS POSTED ON THE AGENDA FOR JUST, WELL, UM, ALL OF THESE ITEMS, ALL THESE ITEMS ARE POSTED FOR TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR DISCUSSION.

UM, WE RECEIVE A HEADS UP FROM STAFF ON WHETHER OR NOT THERE'S ANY OPPOSITION AND THAT DETERMINES WHETHER STUFF IS PUT ON CONSENT OR DISCUSSION.

UM, SO WHEN ITEMS ARE POSTED ON THE AGENDA, THEY'RE ALL POSTED FOR DISCUSSION.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

ALRIGHT, SO YES.

CAN I CLARIFY, OR IF I THOUGHT YOU SAID THAT NINE WAS ON CONSENT AND 10 WAS BE POSSIBLY POSTPONED OR DISCUSSED.

CAN WE CLARIFY THAT BOTH MINE AND 10 ARE POSTPONEMENT DISCUSSION NINE AND 10 TOGETHER OR POSTPONEMENT DISCUSSION.

THOSE ARE BOTH THE KNUCKLES CASE.

SO LET ME JUST RUN THROUGH THIS REAL QUICK AND MAKE SURE WE'RE ALL ON THE SAME PAGE.

UM, SO B ONE INDEFINITE POSTPONEMENT, UM, ITEMS AND BEFORE THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING POSTPONED UNTIL JULY 28.

UM, AND, UH, THOSE ARE, THOSE ARE ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.

UM, ITEM B FIVE HAS BEEN PULLED FOR DISCUSSION, UM, ITEM B SIX B SEVEN, AND TO GET THOSE, THE BENNETT ROAD CASES.

CAN SOMEBODY GO ON MUTE PLEASE? UM, UH, THOSE ARE ON THE DISCUSSION AGENDA ITEMS B NINE AND , UM, ARE ON THE DISCUSSION AGENDA FOR POSTPONEMENT.

AND THEN WE'LL GO INTO THE ACTUAL CASE.

UM, ITEM B 11, AND B12 OR STAFF INDEFINITE POSTPONEMENT THAT'S ON CONSENT ITEM B 13 IS APPLICANT INDEFINITE POSTPONEMENT FOR CONSENT ITEM B 14 IS, UM, NEIGHBORHOOD POSTPONEMENT ON CONSENT ITEM B 15 IS APPLICANT POSTPONEMENT TIL AUGUST 25TH ON CONSENT.

UM, ITEM B 16 IS CONSENT FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION ITEM B 17 IS FOR DISCUSSION ITEM B 18 IS FOR CONSENT.

UH, OF THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION BE 19 IS CONSENTIVE STEP FOR RECOMMENDATION B 20 IS A CONSENT OF STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND BE 21 IS FOR DISCUSSION.

IS THAT CLEAR WITH EVERYBODY? ALL RIGHT.

UM, AT THIS POINT,

[00:15:01]

UH, UM, SINCE NO COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY FURTHER INPUT, UH, I'M GOING TO OPEN IT UP TO THE FOLKS WHO ARE ON THE LINE.

UM, THIS MIGHT GET A LITTLE CHAOTIC, BUT, UM, THE, UH, JUST AS A REMINDER, THIS IS TO DISCUSS, UH, WHICH ITEMS ARE ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.

UM, AND IF YOU'D LIKE, UM, ANY OF THEM, UH, TO BE DISCUSSED FURTHER, BASICALLY ARGUE THAT, THAT THEY SHOULD BE, UM, UH, PULLED FOR DISCUSSION.

THIS IS THE TIME TO DO IT.

UM, BUT ANY OF THE ITEMS THAT I'VE LISTED FOR DISCUSSION, UM, WE'RE GOING TO TALK ABOUT THOSE, UH, WHEN THEY COME UP IN THE AGENDA.

SO I'M GONNA GO AHEAD AND OPEN UP THE LINE FOR A MINUTE, FOR ANYBODY WHO WISHES TO SPEAK.

OKAY.

I'M HEARING NONE.

UH, CAN

[Consent Agenda]

I GET A MOTION TO, UH, OR LET'S, LET'S DO A RECUSALS.

UM, EXCUSALS SORRY, COMMISSIONER HEMPHILL, GO AHEAD.

YES, I'M ACCUSING SOME BE 13, BE 16 AND BE 17 WHERE THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS FOR THOSE PROJECTS.

OKAY.

RAISE YOUR HAND.

IF YOU ALSO HAVE RECUSALS, UH, COMMISSIONER ANDERSON, GO AHEAD FROM B 11.

WELL, THEY'RE OWNED BY AUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY AND MY INCOME.

THANK YOU.

ANY OTHER COMMISSIONERS AS OCCLUSALS I'M SURE.

CAUSING A CHAIR RECUSING FROM THE MLK CAGES THAT BE FIVE? UM, THAT'S CORRECT.

I WAS WORKING ON THAT.

OKAY.

ANY FURTHER RECUSALS? UM, ALRIGHT.

AT THIS POINT, UM, DO I HAVE A MOTION TO, UH, CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS READ A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER IS OUR SECOND BY COMMISSIONER SHEA, UM, ALL, UH, AND FAVOR.

UM, AND I'LL, I'LL RE UH, IF THERE ARE ANY DEVIATIONS FROM THE ENTIRE AGENDA AT THE END, ALL IN FAVOR OF THE CONSENT AGENDA AND IN ITS ENTIRETY.

OKAY.

COMMISSIONER, HOW ARE YOU VOTING, UH, COMMISSION AND, UH, HMM.

UM, CAUSE YOU'RE, HOW ARE YOU WISHING TO ABSTAIN OR VOTE? NO, ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.

HOLD UP ONE FINGER IF YOU'RE VOTING.

YES, THE LEGISLATOR STYLE.

ALRIGHT.

OKAY.

SO, UH, THAT IS UNANIMOUS.

UM, IF YOU WOULD SHOW ME ABSTAINING ON, UM, I'M SORRY.

UH, NO, THAT'S, THAT'S IT.

UM, SO ARE THERE ANY EXTENSIONS OR, UH, DEVIATIONS FROM THE VOTING ON THE ENTIRE AGENDA? OKAY.

AND JUST A REMINDER, UH, COMMISSIONER CAUSEY ITEM WAS PULLED FOR DISCUSSIONS THAT WASN'T ON THE, UH, THE CONSENT AGENDA.

SO, UM, I'D LIKE TO GO AHEAD AND CRUSH THE SECRET BEFORE I CALL ON YOU.

I'D LIKE TO DO, UM, THE KNUCKLES CROSSING POST FILLMONT FIRST, PULL IT OUT AND DISCUSS WHETHER OR NOT WE'RE GOING TO POSTPONE IT.

AND THEN JUST SINCE WE HAVE EVERYBODY ON THE LINE, UM, I'D LIKE TO GO AHEAD AND, UH, AND, AND HEAR THE CASE AT THAT POINT, IF WE CHOOSE NOT TO DISCUSS IT SO THAT WE CAN KIND OF DO IT ALL AT ONCE AND THEN RESUME THE, UH, THE AGENDA AND REGULAR ORDER.

UM, IF DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY OBJECTION TO THAT IS YOUR HAND IF YOU DO OKAY.

COMMISSIONER SEEGER, IS THAT WHAT YOU WANTED TO TALK ABOUT? I'M SORRY, MY MOUSE WASN'T COOPERATING.

WELL, IT WAS A QUESTION I HAD AND ASK PEOPLE IF THEY WANTED OR PARTICIPANTS, IF THEY WANTED TO DISCUSS ANYTHING ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.

MY QUESTION IS IF THEY GO IN AND SAY SOMETHING, BUT YET THEY WANT TO DISCUSS ANOTHER CASE FURTHER ON, WILL THEY BE TERMINATED? UH, THERE CERTAINLY NOTHING IN OUR RULES THAT WOULD DO SO.

AND, UM, STAFF CAN, CAN JUMP IN HERE.

AND IT'S A BIT OF A MOOT POINT BECAUSE, WELL, LET'S DO THIS SINCE IT DIDN'T ACTUALLY APPLY HERE.

UM, LET'S, UH, LET'S REQUEST THAT STAFF WORK OUT, UH, ANY PROCEDURES FOR ANYBODY WHO DOES WANT TO SPEAK ON THE, UH, ON THE CONSENT AGENDA IN THE FUTURE TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY ARE NOT KICKED OUT FOR, FOR OTHER ITEMS. THAT'S FINE.

OKAY, GREAT.

[00:20:01]

OKAY.

[9. Plan Amendment: NPA-2016-0012.01.SH - Nuckols Crossing Road - SMART Housing; District 2 Location: 4400 Nuckols Crossing Road, Williamson Creek Watershed; Southeast Combined (Franklin Park) NP Area Owner/Applicant: Owners: Angelos Angelou and John Sasaridis. Applicant: McDowell Housing Partners (Ariana Brendle) Agent: Thrower Design (Ron Thrower) Request: Single Family to Multifamily land use Staff Rec.: Recommended Staff: Maureen Meredith, 512-974-2695, Maureen.meredith@austintexas.gov Planning and Zoning Department]

LET'S GO AHEAD AND TAKE UP BEING NINE, UH, UM, FOR THE DISCUSSION POSTPONEMENT, UM, BY THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

UM, AND IT'S BEEN A WHILE SINCE WE'VE DONE THIS, DO WE USUALLY GET THE STAFF PRESENTATION FOR WHEN WE'RE DISCUSSING POSTPONEMENTS FIRST AS THIS IS A DISCUSSION POSTPONEMENT, YOU'LL HAVE TWO MEMBERS FROM EACH SIDE FOR AND AGAINST AT TWO MINUTES EACH.

AH, GREAT.

OKAY.

AND NO STAFF INTRO, IS THAT CORRECT? CORRECT.

OKAY.

UM, LET'S GO AHEAD AND START WITH THE, UM, THE PARTY THAT'S PRESENTING THE POSTPONEMENT.

UM, DO WE HAVE, UH, UM, SPEAKERS FROM THE, UH, FOLKS FROM WORK IT'S, THEY'RE BEING LABELED AS THE NEIGHBORHOOD WHO WISH TO POSTPONE THIS CASE STAFF? DO WE HAVE ANY OF THEM PULLED UP, JOE, BEAR WITH US ONE MINUTE AND THEN APPLICANTS, IF YOU'RE LISTENING, IF YOU'RE GOING TO BE PREPARED TO GO AFTER THEM, YOU HAVE A, UM, UP TO TWO SPEAKERS FOR TWO MINUTES PURCHASING, SO WE SHOULD BE READY FOR YOUR REMARKS.

THANK YOU.

OKAY.

SO DO WE HAVE SOME ON THE LINE FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD STIR RIVERA? WE HAVE SOMEBODY DOING GENERALLY DO WE'RE WORKING OUT A TECHNICAL.

OKAY.

I BELIEVE I HAD MS AGAIN TO PROVIDE HER, IF YOU CAN PROVIDE YOUR REMARKS AT THIS TIME.

HELLO.

LET'S GO AHEAD FIRST.

DO YOU HAVE A MUTED? CAN YOU HEAR ANA? I CANNOT HEAR ON A, ON A, IF YOU'RE HERE HIT STAR SIX TO UNMUTE, RIGHT.

IF SHE IS NOT AVAILABLE, I'M THE SECOND SPEAKER LAUREL GRANTSVILLE.

OKAY.

IF YOU WANT TO GO AHEAD AND, AND MAYBE WE'LL GET ON IT.

OKAY.

WE'RE REQUESTING THIS POSTPONEMENT BECAUSE THERE WAS A MAJOR CHANGE.

UM, IT WAS A MAJOR CHANGE IN THE, UM, PROPOSAL, AND WE DID NOT EVEN FIND OUT ABOUT IT UNTIL LAST WEDNESDAY.

UH, WE GOT THE STAFF REPORT ON TUESDAY AND THEN ABOUT AN HOUR BEFORE A MEETING THAT WAS SCHEDULED, UM, ALSO WITH VERY LITTLE NOTICE BETWEEN THE APPLICANT.

DID HE STAY STAFF, UM, TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT AND NEIGHBORS ON WEDNESDAY NIGHT.

AND WE RECEIVED THE PROPOSAL FROM THE APPLICANT ABOUT AN HOUR BEFORE THE, AND IN THIS PROPOSAL, THERE WERE SEVERAL MAJOR CHANGES THAT WE HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT.

UM, MOST SPECIFICALLY THE TRAFFIC, UM, THE, UH, ISSUE, THE, UM, THERE'S BEEN A VERY MAJOR PROPOSAL TO PUT VERTICAL DELINEATORS IN THE MIDDLE OF NEPALIS CROSSING.

UM, WE DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW THIS IS GOING TO WORK.

AND SO IT'D BE VERY HARD TO AGREE TO ANYTHING WITH THE APPLICANT WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING HOW THAT PARTICULAR ITEMS, THAT, UH, TRAFFIC ISLAND, THE RIGHT AND LEFT TURN LANES THAT THEY'RE GOING TO PROPOSE TO PUT IN.

ALSO THE FACT THAT THEY CHANGED THEIR, UM, REQUEST FROM AN MF TO WHICH THE CITY STAFF WAS SUPPORTIVE TO AN MFR, WHICH IS NOT SUPPORTED.

SO BASED ON THOSE, UH, ESPECIALLY THOSE TWO ITEMS, UH, TRAFFIC AND THE, UH, UH, REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL, UH, SONY AMA FOR US, UH, WE'RE ASKING FOR THE POSTPONEMENT SO THAT WE CAN GET SOME OF THESE QUESTIONS ANSWERED BY THE APPLICANT AND TRY TO FIGURE OUT EXACTLY HOW, ESPECIALLY THIS NEW

[00:25:01]

TRAFFIC PATTERN WOULD WORK ON NUMBERS CROSSING, AND IF IT WOULD BE A HINDRANCE OR A BENEFIT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

UM, THAT IS YOUR TIME.

DO WE HAVE ANA AGRI ON THE LINE AND HIT STAR SIX TO UNMUTE? WELL, CHAIR, I'M NOT ON A, BUT I'M ON THE CONTACT TEAM AND I UNDERSTAND THAT SHE'S TRYING TO WORK SOMETHING OUT.

HELLO.

YOU'RE SPEAKING TO THE TECHNICAL ISSUE.

OKAY.

YEAH.

YEAH.

SO SPEAKING FOR US AS A NEIGHBORHOOD CONTACT TEAM, AND SO HOPEFULLY THEY CAN WORK THAT OUT CAUSE SHE'S REALLY, UM, ELITE SPEAKER FOR US.

OKAY.

UM, BECAUSE YEAH.

THANK YOU, SIR.

UM, BECAUSE THESE, UH, THE DEBATE TIMES THAT, WELL, DID WE POST THIS? UM, , IF WE ARE ABLE TO SLIGHTLY DEVIATE FROM THE ORDER HERE UNDER UNANIMOUS CONSENT, I BELIEVE MR. GHETTO SHOULD BE READY TO PROVIDE HER REMARKS.

GREAT.

SCARY.

ARE YOU HERE? IT WAS ME SAYING, CAUSE SHE NEEDED TO HIT STAR SIX, POTENTIALLY SHE'S NEEDED.

OKAY.

MR. GARY, CAN YOU HEAR US, MR. BARRY? DO I HAVE IT CORRECT THAT WITH UNANIMOUS CONSENT? I CAN JUST SWITCH UP THE ORDER OF SPEAKERS A LITTLE BIT.

THAT IS CORRECT.

OKAY.

UM, DO I HAVE ANY OBJECTION TO GOING AHEAD AND LETTING THE APPLICANT I HAVE THEIR TWO, TWO MINUTES SLOTS AND THEN WE CAN COME BACK TO MR. GARY AND HOPEFULLY IN THE INTERVENING TIME WE CAN, WE CAN WORK IT OUT, SEEING NONE.

UM, WE HAVE THE, UH, THE APPLICANT HERE, SAUCY.

THIS IS VICTORIA THROWER DESIGN I'M HERE.

OKAY, GO AHEAD.

YOU HAVE TWO MINUTES TO MAKE YOUR CASE FOR NOT POSTPONING.

AND THEN, UH, AND THEN THERE'S A SECOND SPOT FOR TWO MINUTES IF SOMEBODY WISHES TO SPEAK.

OKAY.

UM, SO TO ADDRESS THE CONCERN, UH, THE REASON FOR POSTPONING THIS CASE, UM, THE, THE NEIGHBORHOOD'S MAJOR CONCERN IS THAT THERE'S A MAJOR CHANGES IN THE PROPOSAL THAT THEY WERE UNAWARE OF, AND THAT IS SIMPLY NOT TRUE.

UM, WE MET WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD BACK IN DECEMBER WHEN THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPER CAME ON BOARD AND WE EXPRESSED TO THEM THE CHANGES AT THAT TIME.

UH, I ALSO INCLUDED, UH, AND I, GARY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING CONTACT TEAM ON EMAILS, UM, THAT WHEN WE MADE OUR OFFICIAL, UH, APPLICATION AMENDMENT TO THE CITY TO CITY STAFF, UM, AND WE'VE BEEN IN, WE'VE CONTINUED TO BE IN COMMUNICATION WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING CONTENT TEAMS. UM, WHEN WE DID AMEND OUR APPLICATION, THE CITY WAS REQUIRED TO SEND OUT A NEW NOTICE OF FILING.

SO THEY'VE BEEN AWARE OF AN AMENDED REQUEST FOR SOME TIME.

UM, ADDITIONALLY, YOU KNOW, THE MAJOR CHANGES WITH TRAFFIC THAT THEY'RE, THAT THEY'RE REFERRING TO WHAT THEY'RE REFERRING TO OUR SOLUTIONS THAT THEY REQUESTED AND COMMISSIONED REQUESTED THAT WE DIG DEEPER TO FIND A SOLUTION FOR SAFER ACCESS.

AND WE DID THAT.

AND, UM, THESE ARE THE SOLUTIONS THAT ARE PRESENTED AND THEY HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AND WITH ALL DUE RESPECT, I UNDERSTAND THE NEIGHBORHOOD WANTS TO BETTER UNDERSTAND THAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD, UM, THE PROFESSIONALS HAVE WEIGHED IN THAT THIS IS, THESE ARE SPACED SOLUTIONS FOR THE CONCERNS AT HAND.

AND SO WE, WE REQUEST THAT THIS CASE BE ABLE TO MOVE FORWARD TONIGHT.

IT IS AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT THAT IS UP AGAINST A DEADLINE FOR FUNDING, AND WE DO NOT WANT TO LOSE THAT FUNDING.

UM, BECAUSE THAT MEANS WE ALSO LOSE THIS AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECTS.

SO WE WOULD REQUEST THAT THIS CASE HAS BEEN ONGOING FOR MANY, FOR A LONG TIME.

WE'VE MET WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND STAFF MULTIPLE OCCASIONS, AND WE WOULD REALLY LIKE TO MOVE FORWARD TONIGHT.

UM, DO WE HAVE SOMEONE ELSE ON THE LINE WHO WAS JUST SPEAK, UM, AGAINST POSTPONING, THIS CASE THAT'S CHAIR, THIS WAS RON THROWER.

[00:30:01]

I JUST WANTED TO ADD ON TO WHAT VICTORIA HAD STATED.

UH, YOU KNOW, AGAIN, ATD HAS LED THAT THE DRIVEWAY ISSUE AND HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROJECT DOES HAVE SAFE ACCESS.

MANY OF YOU MAY HAVE BEEN ON COMMISSION, UH, TWO YEARS AGO WHEN WE HAD THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS.

AND THAT WAS ONE OF THE VERY CORE ITEMS AS TO WHY THE ITEM WAS, UH, POSTPONE TWO YEARS AGO.

AND THAT WAS FOR US TO WORK OUT THIS POINT, IT'S SAFE ACCESS AND WE'VE GOT IT.

UM, THE SAFE ACCESS IS THERE IS, UH, IT'S A DESIGN THAT EVERYBODY HAS BOUGHT OFF ON AND THE ENGINEERS ARE STANDING BEHIND, UH, THEIR SUPPORT FOR, UH, THE POINT OF SAFE ACCESS.

AND AGAIN, TO ECHO WHAT VICTORIA HAD STATED, UH, IT IS A HUNDRED PERCENT AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT FOR SENIORS, AND IT'S PROVIDING 179 UNITS.

AND ANY DELAY IS GOING TO CAUSE FOR THIS PROJECT TO LOSE FUNDING, WHICH MEANS THIS PROJECT WILL GO AWAY IN ITS ENTIRETY.

AND I COMMIT THAT WE WILL FULLY ENGAGE WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD AT EVERY STEP OF THE WAY AS WE CONTINUE TO MOVE FORWARD THROUGH THE CITY COUNCIL PROCESS.

AND WE WOULD APPRECIATE YOUR SUPPORT FOR MOVING THIS PROCESS PROJECT FORWARD TODAY.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

UM, STEPH, DID WE RESOLVE THE ISSUE WITH MR. GARY ON, ARE YOU HERE? HELLO? WE CAN HEAR YOU.

GO AHEAD.

YOU HAVE TWO MINUTES, TWO MINUTES.

FANTASTIC.

YES.

OKAY.

CHAIR, KENNY, UM, INVITE YOUR CONSTANT COMMISSIONER.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

MY NAME IS BENNETT IKEA.

UM, I'M BEING TO GET TEXT HERE FOR THE CONTACT TEAM AND I ALSO SERVE ON THE DECK, BUT I'M NOT BE SPEAKING FOR ON BEHALF OF THIS APP.

THIS IS THE FIRST REQUEST BY THE CONTACT TEAM TO .

WE HAD OUR MOST RECENT MEETING ON JULY 8TH WITH WITH, UH, WITH THE APPLICANT AND CITY STAFF.

AS A RESULT OF THAT MEETING, WE HAD SOME ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS OR CONTACTING MICK AND LAST NIGHT.

AND WITH THAT WE REQUESTED WERE REQUESTING THE POSTPONEMENT SPECIFIC TO THIS TO GIVE US THE OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS THOSE CONCERNS THAT WE HAVE THAT ARE SPECIFIC TO MAKING INFORMATION, PUBLIC CONCERNS, PUBLIC SAFETY CONCERNS, SPECIFIC TO TRAFFIC, PEDESTRIANS, AND BICYCLISTS.

WE ARE REQUESTING THE OPPORTUNITY TO MEET WITH THAT ATD STEP.

WE'RE ASKING FOR A MODELING, UM, WHICH THEY ARE SAYING THAT THEY WILL PROVIDE, UH, ALSO REQUESTING INFORMATION AUDITIONING IN REGARDS TO THAT IN MY FOUR ZONING AGAIN, KNUCKLES CROSSING A SUBSTANDARD ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE.

IT HAS NO SHOULDERS, NO SIDEWALKS IN OUR CONCERN IS WE ARE ROADS BECAUSE OF THAT.

SO WE'RE RE RESPECTFULLY REQUESTING THE POSTPONEMENT AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, YOUR TIME AND YOUR SERVICE.

THANK YOU, MR. GARY.

UM, MR. RIVERA, CAN YOU REMIND ME, UH, ARE WE UNDER STANDARD, UH, COMMISSIONER DEBATE RULES ON THIS? SO WE'RE GOING IN A ROUND ROBIN.

OKAY.

OKAY.

UM, IS THERE ANY COMMISSIONERS WHO PREFERABLY HAVE QUESTIONS, BUT YOU ARE ALSO ALLOWED TO SPEAK AT THIS TIME WITH CON AND THAT'S IT FOR NOW? GO AHEAD AND SEE THERE.

I HAVE A QUESTION REGARDING THE CHANGE FROM MF TWO TO MF FOUR WITH THAT FIRST POST LANDED LAST WEEK TO THE CONTACT CHAIN, EXCEPT SOME OF THE MEMBERS.

SO WE CALL THE TECH.

I'M SORRY.

COULD WE, UM, MAYBE, YEAH.

DO WE HAVE, UH, MS. MEREDITH OR MS. RHODES ON THE LINE WHO CAN ADVISE ON THAT? THIS IS WENDY RHODES, THE ZONING CASE MANAGER.

CAN YOU HEAR ME? YES, WE CAN HEAR YOU.

GO AHEAD.

OKAY.

SO, UM, THE, THE REQUESTS FOR MF FOUR WAS, UH, SENT OUT BY WAY OF NOTICE OF FILING IN AROUND EARLY FEBRUARY OF THIS YEAR.

UM, I DID NOTIFY FOR MF FOUR THROUGH, UM, THROUGH THE NOTICES FOR PLANNING COMMISSION AND FOR TONIGHT AND CITY COUNCIL SCHEDULED FOR THE JULY, THE 30TH MEETING.

UM, THE STAFF IS ONLY RECOMMENDING MF TOO.

UM, WE DID HAVE A MEETING LAST WEEK WHERE I PRESENTED THE STAFF, UH, RECOMMENDATION FOR MS TO, TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

UM, THE APPLICANT WAS AWARE OF THAT AS WELL, BUT WOULD LIKE TO FIRST DO THEIR MF FOR REQUESTS.

AND I GUESS, I'M

[00:35:01]

SORRY, I COULDN'T HEAR YOU.

I DID SEND OUT THE, UM, STAFF REPORT PRIOR TO THE MEETING.

IT WASN'T A LONG TIME BEFORE THE MEETING BECAUSE I WAS STILL FINISHING IT UP.

WE MET LAST WEDNESDAY.

I, I, MY RECOLLECTION IS, IS THAT I SEND IT OUT ON TUESDAY, THE 7TH OF JULY, THE FULL STAFF REPORT, THE FULL STAFF REPORT.

I'M JUST TRYING TO BE DETERMINED WHEN THE CONTACT TEAM WAS NOTIFIED ABOUT THE ZONING REQUEST OR REQUEST FOR THAT LAST WEEK, THE FIRST TIME THEY WERE NOTIFIED.

SO THEY WERE FIRST NOTIFIED BY WAY OF A NOTICE OF FILING BECAUSE THE APPLICATION WAS AMENDED FROM NFP TO END UP FOUR IN FEBRUARY OF THIS, AT THAT TIME STILL WAS STILL IN REVIEW.

THE NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC ANALYSIS WAS STILL IN REVIEW.

OKAY.

AND THEN MY SECOND QUESTION PROBABLY SHOULD GO TO AUSTIN TRAFFIC OR SOMEONE TO AMP YOUR MODEL ON THIS ROADWAY IS 25 FEET WIDE.

THAT'S PAID TIP THERE, ART TO KNEE CURBS OR ANYTHING.

HOW IS PUTTING IN ISLANDS GOING TO WORK? AMBER MITCHELL, ARE YOU ON THE LINE? I CAN ANTICIPATE YOU THERE.

I THINK MR. COMMISSIONER THOMPSON.

WELL, GO AHEAD.

IF THIS IS A DISCUSSION POSTPONEMENT, CAN WE JUST DISCUSS LIMITED DISCUSSION TO THE MERITS OF POSTPONING THE CASE? YEAH, I AGREE.

ONLY THING WAS TO GET TO, CAN WE GO FORWARD, NOT KNOWING WILL THIS ACTUALLY WORK ON A 25 FOOT ROADWAY AND THAT THEY UNDERSTAND THE GROUND RULES AND I THOUGHT, ALL RIGHT, ARE THERE OTHER COMMISSIONERS HAVE QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? SO I JUST WANT TO FOLLOW ALONG A LITTLE BIT ON COMMISSIONER SEEGER'S COMMENT ABOUT WHEN THE NEIGHBORHOOD KNEW ABOUT IT.

SO IT SOUNDS LIKE, SO THERE'S A NOTIFICATION THAT'S ACTUALLY FROM THE CITY STAFF AT THE SAME TIME, YOU KNOW, WHEN WAS THE APPLICANT IN DISCUSSIONS WITH THE, UH, WITH THE CONTACT TEAM ABOUT GOING TO THE, UH, EMMA FOR RIGHT, BECAUSE IT SOUNDED LIKE IT WAS DECEMBER.

AND, UH, MAYBE THIS IS A QUESTION TO THE AFRICA.

WAS IT IN DECEMBER THAT THEY ACTUALLY MET AND PRESENTED THE MFA FOR, UM, WHEN WAS THE ACTUAL TIME THAT YOU ACTUALLY PRESENTED TO THE CONTACT TEAM THAT YOU WERE PURSUING AND THAT'S TO THE APPLICANT? THIS IS VICTORIA.

CAN YOU HEAR ME? YES, WE CAN GO AHEAD.

OKAY.

I'M HERE.

SORRY.

I'M EATING MYSELF AGAIN.

UM, SO YES, WE, WE MET WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING CONTEXT, UM, BACK IN DECEMBER, THAT IS WHEN MCDOWELL HOUSING PARTNERS CAME ON BOARD TO PROVIDE AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECTS.

THEY WANTED TO INTRODUCE THEMSELVES TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AT THAT TIME.

AND WE ATTENDED A MEETING AT THE LIBRARY THERE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

UM, AND WE DID, WE DID MAKE THEM AWARE THAT THERE WAS GOING TO BE AN OFFICIAL AMENDMENT TO THE APPLICATION COMING FORWARD, BECAUSE WITH THIS PROJECT BEING NOW AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT, THEY WERE GOING TO BE MORE UNITS AND IT WAS GOING TO BE, UH, A BUILDING THAT WAS LIKELY TO LOOK DIFFERENT FROM WHAT MAY HAVE BEEN, UH, DESIGNED WITH RADIUS.

UM, SO I WILL ALSO COMMENT, UH, LIKE I SAID EARLIER THAT, UM, I HAVE BEEN IN COMMUNICATION WITH, UM, FRIENDS, BELL AND ON A URI ALL ALONG.

AND WE WORKED WELL TOGETHER AND I, WHEN I EMAILED STAFF OUR AMENDED APPLICATION, I ALSO MADE THEM AWARE THAT WE DID SO, SO NOT ONLY DID WE MEET WITH THEM IN DECEMBER TO TELL THEM THAT THIS WAS COMING, I ALSO INCLUDED THEM AND INFORMED THEM WHEN WE MADE OUR OFFICIAL, UM, AMENDMENT TO THE APPLICATION.

NEXT QUESTION HAS TO DO WITH THE TIMING OF THE, UH, THE TRAFFIC WITH WHEN THAT WAS, AS LONG AS IT DID, WAS THAT PRESENTED AFTER THE, UH, MFR PRESENTATION ABOUT, UM, THE TRAFFIC SOLUTIONS OR WAS THAT AN OLD SOLUTION? THE, WHO WAS THAT QUESTION DIRECTED AT? YEAH, THAT'S, UH, THAT'S THE APP.

OKAY.

OKAY.

OKAY.

OKAY.

AND, UH, JUST AS A HOUSEKEEPING NOTE, UH, COMMISSIONER SHAY, YOUR TIME HAS EXPIRED, BUT I'LL, I'LL TAKE THE QUESTION UP IN MY TIME.

GO AHEAD AND CONTINUE

[00:40:01]

WITH YOUR ANSWER.

OKAY.

UM, WHEN WE AMENDED OUR REQUEST TO ASK FOR MF FOR ZONING, UH, WE THEN HAD TO FOLLOW THROUGH WITH AN UPDATED NTA, UM, AND THAT DID TAKE SOME TIME TO DO, BUT WE WERE PREPARED AND READY TO SHARE THAT HOWEVER, THE CORONAVIRUS CAME ABOUT AND THAT PUT A WRENCH IN EVERYONE'S, UH, PLAN FOR MEETINGS WITH NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY.

AND UNTIL THAT WAS FIGURED OUT, UM, WE HAD TO WAIT, WE HAD TO WAIT TO SHARE THAT WE MADE A PROMISE TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD STAFF, AND WE, AS THE AGENT MADE A PROMISE TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT WE WOULD HAVE ANOTHER MEETING AFTER WE HAD ALL OF THE INFORMATION FROM THE TRAFFIC STUDIES THAT WERE BEING PRODUCED.

AND SO WE HAD INTENDED, UH, TO MOVE FORWARD AND HAVE THIS MEETING WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD BACK IN APRIL, BUT BECAUSE OF THE VIRUS THAT COULDN'T HAPPEN.

SO WE HAD IT AS SOON AS WE COULD AVAILABLE, UM, WITHOUT WHILE STILL TRYING TO MEET WITH DEADLINE.

AGAIN, THEY ARE UP AGAINST A SIGNIFICANT DEADLINE THAT WILL KILL THIS PROJECT IF, UM, THEY CANNOT MOVE FORWARD.

WE WAITED AS LONG AS WE COULD.

OKAY.

THANK YOU, MS. AUSSIE, UM, ARE THERE ANY OTHER COMMISSIONERS WITH QUESTIONS OR POINTS? YES.

MR. KUSHNER IS OUR CHAIR AFRICAN TO THE FACT THAT IF YOU'RE NOT A BY APPLICATION DEADLINE.

SO I JUST WANT TO UNDERSTAND, UM, I'M SO SORRY THAT THAT WAS VERY MUFFLED AND I'M NOT SURE WHAT THE QUESTION WAS.

YEAH.

A LITTLE BIT.

UM, I'M LISTENING VERY CLOSELY.

OKAY.

WHEN YOU'RE ESSENTIALLY ASKING IS MY UNDERSTANDING THIS APPLICATION.

AND SO THERE'S A TIMELINE ASSOCIATED TO THE DANSKIN APPLICATION.

CAN YOU SPEAK TO HOW OKAY.

I STILL DIDN'T GET ALL THAT, BUT I, I GET THAT.

YOU'RE ASKING ABOUT THE TIMELINE FOR THE APPLICATION PROCESS.

YES.

AND HOW THAT IMPACTS YOUR YEAH.

THE QUESTION IS, IS THAT, UM, BECAUSE THIS IS A TAX CREDIT PROJECT, UM, HOW, UH, THE POSTPONEMENT THAT IS BEING REQUESTED HERE IS GOING TO SPECIFICALLY IMPACT YOUR, UM, YOUR TIMELINE FOR THE TAX CREDIT.

YEAH.

UH, IT, IT WILL IMPACT OUR TIMELINE, WHICH IS, WHICH IS WHY I WAS STATING THAT, YOU KNOW, IT HAS THE ABILITY TO KILL THIS PROJECT IF WE, IF WE ARE POSTPONED, UH, SIGNIFICANTLY.

UM, SO I WILL SAY THAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS, WE WERE, WE WERE READY TO HAVE THAT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING EARLY, UM, BY THE ZOOM PLATFORM.

UM, BUT THE CITY, UH, HELD FIRM THAT THEY NEEDED TO HOST THE MEETING AND THEY NEEDED TO FIND A SOLUTION OTHER THAN ZOO.

SO THAT WAS PART OF THE REASON WHY, UH, THE MEETING WASN'T HELD SOONER, UM, BECAUSE THEY WERE LOOKING FOR A SOLUTION, UM, ON THEIR SIDE.

SO I'LL SEE IF I CAN CONTINUE THAT QUESTIONING.

UM, I BELIEVE I HEARD IT STATED THAT THERE, THAT THE COUNCIL HAS GONNA TOOK US UP TO THE JULY 30TH MEETING.

IS THAT CORRECT? YEAH.

FOR THE JULY 30TH MEETING, I'D ALSO LIKE TO ADD THAT THE COMPLETED NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC ANALYSIS WAS NOT AVAILABLE UNTIL THE 19TH OF JUNE.

OKAY.

AND CAN I ASK, UM, UH, FROM A SAUCY, IF THE COUNCIL MEETING IS ON THE 30TH AND WE MEET ON THE 28TH, UM, IS, IS THERE THAT MUCH OF AN ISSUE? WHAT WOULD BE THE ISSUE WITH US APPROVING IT? IF WE DID IT ON THE 28TH, OUR CONCERN, OUR CONCERN IS THAT WHILE, WHILE THAT, THAT IS A POSSIBILITY, OUR CONCERN IS THAT, UM, WE WILL BE, WE WILL BE FURTHER, UM, DELAYED AT COUNCIL ALSO TOO.

YOU KNOW, WE, WE'RE NOT, WE HAVE TO PROVIDE TIME FOR THE DRAFTING OF AN ORDINANCE AS WELL.

AND SO THEIR, THEIR TIMELINE IS THAT THEY, THEY NEED TO HAVE A RULING, A FINAL RULING FROM COUNCIL BY THE END OF AUGUST.

UM, SO AS YOU CAN SEE, YOU KNOW, KNOWING THAT THIS CASE IS LIKELY NOT TO GO THREE READINGS IN ONE DAY, UM, WE'RE LOOKING AT, AT THE VERY LEAST TWO READINGS WITH COUNCIL

[00:45:01]

AND COUNCIL, YOU KNOW, BY, BY CITY CODE, THEY'RE REQUIRED TO, UM, THEY'RE ESSENTIALLY REQUIRED TO GRANT POSTPONEMENTS.

SO OUR CONCERN WITH GRANTING A POSTPONEMENT TONIGHT IS THAT IT WILL EAT UP ANY WIGGLE ROOM THAT WE HAVE, UM, BEFORE WE EVEN GET TO COUNCIL.

AND, UM, AS I SAID THERE, WE, WE JUST HAVE REALLY, WE HAVE HUGE CONCERNS FOR, UM, THE FUNDING ON THIS PROJECT GOING AWAY.

I JUST WANT TO CONTINUE THIS LINE OF QUESTION IN THE LAST MINUTE HERE.

UM, IF YOU'RE, IF YOU'RE CONCERNED ABOUT GETTING APPROVED BY COMMISSION ON THE 28TH AND THEN GOING TO THE COUNCIL ON THE 30TH IS THAT IT MIGHT TAKE MORE THAN ONE MEETING FOR, UH, MY, MY CONCERN IS NOT THAT IT'LL TAKE MORE THAN ONE MEETING FOR COMMISSION.

MY CONCERN IS THAT IT WILL BE POSTPONED AT COUNCIL FOR WHATEVER REASON, WHETHER THE NEIGHBORHOOD REQUESTS TO POSTPONE MINUTE COUNCIL, OR HOW WOULD IT IMPACT HOW WOULD GETTING APPROVED AT THE 28TH VERSUS NOW IMPACT WHETHER OR NOT YOU GET POSTPONED AT COUNCIL? HOLD ON.

HOW WOULD, HOW WOULD APPROVING SAY THAT ONE MORE TIME APPROVING, UH, IF YOU GOT APPROVAL HERE AT THE COMMISSION ON THE 28TH, INSTEAD OF TODAY ON THE 14TH, HOW WOULD THAT IMPACT, UM, UH, YOUR ABILITY TO GET HURT ON THE 30TH AT COUNCIL? WELL, I MEAN, I GUESS WE COULD GO FIRST READING AND I THINK THAT'S WHAT WE WERE ANTICIPATING.

UM, BUT OUR, OUR CONCERN.

YEAH.

I SEE WHAT YOU'RE SAYING.

I SEE WHAT YOU'RE SAYING.

OKAY.

MY TIME, OR SURE AS OURS TIME HAS EXPIRED.

UM, UH, LET'S SEE.

COMMISSIONER SEGER, UM, YOU'RE AT THE BACK OF THE LIST SINCE IT'S ROUND ROBIN.

UM, DO I SEE ANOTHER COMMISSIONER REQUESTING TO SPEAK OR ASK QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONER THOMPSON, GO AHEAD.

YEAH.

CAN I ASK ABOUT THE FUNDING SOURCE? SO ARE YOU COMPETING, ARE YOU COMPETING WITH, FOR THESE, THE SOURCE OF FUNDING? IN OTHER WORDS, IF THE FUNDS AREN'T AREN'T, AREN'T PRESENTED TO YOU, THERE'S THERE'S FUNDS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING, THEY'RE STILL GOING TO BE THERE BE SPENT AND WILL THEY BE SPENT IN THE AUSTIN AREA? SECOND I'M I'M ASKING THAT QUESTION.

OKAY.

HOLD ON ONE SECOND.

OKAY.

I'M BEING TOLD THAT, UH, UH, THE, THE ISSUE IS ABOUT SECURING THE BOND.

UM, MY UNDERSTANDING IS IT'S NOT NECESSARILY THEIR RD H A COMMITTED, UM, AND SECURING THOSE BONDS.

UM, IN ORDER TO SECURE THOSE BONDS, THEY HAVE TO HAVE, THEY HAVE TO MEET CERTAIN DEADLINES.

SO IF THEY DON'T MEET THOSE DEADLINES, THE BONDS ARE NOT SECURED.

AND MY UNDERSTANDING IS IT DOESN'T HAPPEN.

SECURING BONDS IS THE ISSUE.

THERE'S NOT ENOUGH TO GO AROUND.

OKAY.

I GUESS I'M, MAYBE I CAN ASK FOR THE HELP OF SOME OF OUR AFFORDABLE HOUSING, UH, EXPERTS ON THE COMMISSION, BUT I WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT THERE WERE CERTAIN NUMBER OF, OF TAX CREDIT PROJECTS THAT WENT FORWARD IN A GIVEN AREA A YEAR.

AND THAT, THAT WAS A VERY COMPETITIVE PROCESS.

BUT IF THERE WERE A NUMBER THAT WENT FORWARD, NO MATTER HOW MANY WERE PRESENTED, IS THAT, IS THAT TRUE PERMISSION OR KENNY, CAN YOU HEAR, CAN YOU HEAR ME? CAN I, I DON'T KNOW.

WHO'S SPEAKING.

I'M SORRY.

UH, WHO IS SPEAKING? I'M SORRY.

COMMISSIONER.

KENNY.

THIS IS PATRICK PATRICK RUSSELL WITH NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.

UH, ARE YOU SPEAKING TO COMMISSIONER THOMPSON HERE? I JUST WANT TO MAKE IT, I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE ABOUT THE FINANCING, IF YOU WOULD LIKE ME TO, OR DID YOU HEAR COMMISSIONER THOMPSON'S QUESTION? I DID.

I GUESS THE GIST OF MY QUESTION IS IF THEY WERE, IF THIS PROJECT WERE TO MISS THE DEADLINE WITH AUSTIN, GET FEWER AFFORDABLE HOMES,

[00:50:01]

OR, OR WOULD THOSE DOLLARS GO TO THE NEXT BEST PROJECT IN AUSTIN? IT'S HARD TO SAY, UH, UH, YOU KNOW, IT'S VERY DIFFICULT TO READ A CRYSTAL BALL.

UM, SPECIFICALLY THIS DEAL IS A 4% TAX CREDIT DEAL, WHICH IS, UH, COUPLED WITH PRIVATE ACTIVITY BONDS.

AND MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS APPLICANT IS GOING TO MAKE A GO AT PRIVATE ACTIVITY, BONDS IN AUGUST.

THIS IS COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS THE AUGUST COLLAPSE.

IT IS VERY COMPETITIVE.

UM, SO IT'S DIFFICULT TO SAY IF THEY WILL BE ABLE TO SECURE FINANCING, BUT IT IS CERTAINLY POSSIBLE THAT THEY COULD SECURE FINANCING AT THAT AUGUST 15TH.

UM, AND GIVEN, GIVEN HOW COMPETITIVE IT IS, I CAN CONFIRM THAT, UM, THE MORE TIME YOU HAVE TO PREPARE FOR THAT DEADLINE, UH, THE BETTER, IF THEY, EVEN IF THEY WERE TO GO FOR THAT DEADLINE AND AUGUST 15TH TO GET PRIVATE ACTIVITY BONDS, AS PART OF THE FINANCING, THEY DO HAVE ANOTHER SHOT.

IT IS, UH, LATER IN THE YEAR, AND THERE'S NO GUARANTEE THAT THEY WILL GET IT.

UM, AND, AND, AND IF IT DOES EFFECTIVELY HUNTS THE CAN DOWN THE ROAD WITH A 4%, BUT I THINK JUST TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, I'M NOT AUSTIN.

THIS IS COMMISSIONER HOWARD.

THAT'S CORRECT.

WHAT YOU'RE REFERRING TO IS YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT A REASONABLE ALLOCATION IS 9% TAX GRANTS, NOT THE 4%.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

I MAKE THE MOTION THAT WE HEAR THIS CASE TONIGHT.

UM, WAIT FOR COMMISSIONER SEEKERS.

LAST QUESTION.

IF YOU YOU'RE ABLE TO HOLD YOUR MOTION TO ASK AN ANSWER BY SUMMARY.

OKAY.

WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER ANDERSON TO APPROVE THIS FOR THE DISCUSSION AGENDA SECOND BY COMMISSIONER SHEA, ESPECIALLY I UNDERSTAND YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO YOUR MOTION.

YEAH.

THE BIGGEST CONCERNS I HEARD FROM FOLKS HOPING TO HAVE A LITTLE BIT MORE TIME HAD TO DO WITH WHAT I BELIEVE HEARD WAS WHEN THEY FIRST HEARD ABOUT THIS ZONING, WHICH IT APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN QUITE A WHILE AGO, MAYBE SIX MONTHS OR GREATER.

AND THEN SECOND IS TRAFFIC.

AND, YOU KNOW, THIS IS A SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT.

I'LL NEVER FORGET THIS.

ANYONE TELLING ME ONE TIME ON A SENIOR JOB AND SHE'S WORKING ON, SHE'S LIKE, WELL, IF THERE'S A LOT OF TRAFFIC AND THAT'S AN AMAZING THING FOR SENIORS, THAT'S A PROBLEM WE'RE DESPERATE TO HAVE.

I'VE SPENT A LOT OF TIME IN SENIOR CENTERS AND WITH FOLKS LIVING IN NURSING HOMES, AND I ASSURE YOU THAT THERE'S TYPICALLY NOT A LOT OF TRAFFIC THERE, UNFORTUNATELY.

SO COMMISSIONER SAID, IF WE CAN FOCUS ON POSTPONING OR NOT UNDERSTOOD, THERE YOU GO.

OKAY.

UM, SO ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK AGAINST THE MOTION? AUSTRALIANA SWEETER, GO AHEAD.

YEAH.

UM, I WILL SPEAK AGAINST, UM, I AM VERY FAMILIAR WITH THIS CASE, UM, AND I DON'T BELIEVE THAT THOSE REQUESTING POSTPONEMENT ARE COMPLAINING ABOUT BEING NOTIFIED.

UM, THE VERY FIRST, UH, NOTIFICATION I THINK WE HEARD CLEARLY, OTHERWISE, EVEN FROM THE APPLICANT THAT THE CONTACT TEAM HAD BEEN REALLY GOOD TO WORK WITH.

UM, WE ARE LOOKING AT A DIFFERENT REQUEST FROM WHAT STAFF HAS RECOMMENDED AND THE CONDITIONS ARE NOT CLEAR.

UM, FURTHERMORE, THE TRAFFIC CONCERNS AROUND THIS ARE NOT STRICTLY ABOUT NEW TRAFFIC FROM THE DEVELOPMENT.

THEY'RE ABOUT TRAFFIC ON THAT STREET AND SAFETY ISSUES.

SO I THINK A POSTPONEMENT HERE IS APPROPRIATE, UM, TO FURTHER DISCUSS.

AND I THINK THAT THE QUESTION ABOUT AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND FUNDING, I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE MORE SPECIFIC DETAIL ABOUT THE FIRMS AT STAKE.

UM, BUT WHAT I WILL SAY IS THAT THIS AREA IS COMPLETELY SATURATED WITH AFFORDABLE HOUSING, SO THAT I DON'T, I HONESTLY DON'T BELIEVE THAT THAT SHOULD BE A CONSIDERATION IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE.

UM, THIS CONTACT TEAM HAS SPECIFICALLY APPROVED AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND CHANGED THINGS AROUND AND MAINTAINED THIS AS RURAL RESIDENTIAL.

SO, UM, I'M IN, I'M IN FAVOR OF THE POSTPONEMENT AGAINST HEARING IT TONIGHT, KOSHER MISSION TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION.

GO AHEAD, FINISH YOUR SHEA.

SO A SNICKERS, I MEAN, I THINK, I DON'T THINK THERE'S ANY PROBLEM WITH ME DOING IT TONIGHT.

I THINK A LOT OF THE QUESTIONS, IF WE GET TO ACTUALLY DISCUSS IT, YOU KNOW,

[00:55:01]

YOU WOULD GET US CLOSER TO SOME TYPE OF RESOLUTION.

I MEAN, IF THEY'RE SEEKING THEM BEFORE, WE COULD STILL END UP ARRIVING BACK AT STAFF RECOMMENDATION, BUT THAT'S FOR US TO TALK ABOUT AND DISCUSS TONIGHT.

I MEAN, IF WE REALLY DO NEED MORE TIME AND WE FIND OUT THAT WE NEED MORE, MORE, MORE STUDY INTO THE TRAFFIC THING, WE CAN ALSO POSTPONE IT, ENDED UP FINISHING, HEARING IT AT THE NEXT MEETING.

SO I THINK WE SHOULD JUST GO IN HERE TONIGHT.

IT WILL GET US THAT MUCH CLOSER IF NOT POSSIBLY EVEN RESOLVED.

I SHOULDN'T SPEAK AGAINST THE MOTION.

MR. SEEGER, GO AHEAD.

THE TWO WEEKS WE'LL AFFORD THE TIME FOR THE TWO SIDES TO GET TOGETHER AND DISCUSS THIS.

I DON'T SEE WHERE THERE WILL BE THAT MUCH HARM FOR TWO WEEKS DELAY.

AND THAT'S WHY I WILL BE HEARING THE CASE THIS EVENING.

SURE.

JUST WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR.

SURE.

I THINK SIMILARLY WAS MENTIONED INFORMATION IS READILY AVAILABLE.

OH, I FEEL LIKE WE SHOULD JUST MOVE FORWARD.

THERE ARE IMPLICATIONS FOR DELAY.

I BELIEVE THAT ALL ON FULLY AWARE OF, BUT I THINK THAT THOSE THINGS CAN BE DISCUSSED IN DETAIL TONIGHT.

OKAY.

UM, AND I FINAL COMMISSIONER WISHING TO SPEAK AGAINST MR. SCHNEIDER, GO AHEAD.

AS I'VE UNDERSTOOD THE, UM, ARGUMENTS MADE FOR POSTPONEMENT, UM, I, I REALLY DON'T SEE HOW THERE IS ANY HARM TO DELAYING THIS UNTIL OUR NEXT MEETING WHEN WE CAN VOTE ON IT AND MOVE IT OUT AND GET IT TO COUNCIL IN TIME FOR THE ALREADY SET MEANING FOR THE 30TH.

MY CONCERN IS THAT, AND NOT TO THE SUBSTANCE OF THIS, WHICH I ACTUALLY MAY BE SUPPORTIVE OF, BUT WE, IT ON UPPER NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE APPLICANT TO COME TOGETHER ONE MORE TIME.

IT SOUNDS LIKE THEY'VE WORKED WELL TOGETHER, RESOLVE ALL OF THEIR REMAINING ISSUES OR AS MANY ISSUES AS THEY CAN, AND THEN NOT DELAY IT WHEN IT GOES BEFORE.

COUNCIL.

WHAT CONCERNS ME IS IF WE MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS, IT'S STILL SET FOR THE 30TH FOR COUNCIL.

AND THEN THE NEIGHBORHOOD MAY REQUEST A POSTPONEMENT.

IF WE CAN DO WHAT WE CAN TO BRING PEOPLE TOGETHER AND TRY TO MAKE PEACE, THEN SMOOTH SAILING WHEN IT GOES TO COUNCIL THAT'S.

THAT IS MY CONCERN FOR TONIGHT THAT WE DON'T ALLOW THAT ONE LAST CHANCE TO MAKE PEACE BETWEEN THE TWO PARTIES.

OKAY.

THOSE ARE OUR SPEAKERS.

LET'S GO AHEAD AND TAKE A VOTE.

UM, THE VOTE IS A MOTION BY CONSTRAINT OR SOME SECOND BY COMMISSIONER SHADE TO, UH, TO PUT THIS ON THE DISCUSSION AGENDA FOR TONIGHT.

AND I'M ALL IN FAVOR.

RAISE YOUR GREEN ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR, FIVE, UH, ALL AGAINST GO RED.

UM, ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR, FIVE, SIX, SEVEN, EIGHT, UM, ALL OF THE STAINING, SO THAT, UH, MOTION FAILS FIVE TO EIGHT.

UH, I THINK THIS NATURALLY CALLS FOR A MOTION TO THEN, UM, POSTPONE THE ITEM, UH, UNTIL, UM, PERHAPS JULY 28TH, WHICH WOULD STILL ENABLE THEM TO MEET THEIR JULY 30TH MEETING.

DO I SEE A MOTION, MR. C? MY MOTION IS TO POSTPONE THIS HEARING INTO OUR NEXT MEETING, WHICH IS JULY 28TH.

ALRIGHT, GREAT.

DO I HAVE A SECOND FOR THAT MOTION? SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHNEIDER.

UM, ALL IN FAVOR, GO GREEN ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR, FIVE, SIX, SEVEN, EIGHT, NINE, 10, 11, UH, ALL OPPOSED A ONE AND ALL OF STAINING, WHICH I ASKED HIM.

WHAT WAS YOUR VOTE ON THAT ONE? COULDN'T SEE IT GREEN.

OKAY.

SO I THINK THAT WAS 12 TO ONE.

UM, SO, UH, THAT MOTION PASSES.

UM, SO THAT ITEM HAS BEEN POSTPONED UNTIL JULY, UM, UH, 28TH.

AND, UM, WE, I BELIEVE STILL HAVE THE CONSENT, NOT READ IT THE CONSENT AGENDA.

OKAY.

SO WE'RE ONTO OUR REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS MONTH.

FOUR OF CORENTI.

UM, ALL RIGHT.

[5. Rezoning: E MLK Rezoning, District 1 Location: 5201 East Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, Fort Branch Watershed; Montopolis NP Area; East MLK Combined (MLK-183) NP Area Owner/Applicant: 5201 E MLK LP (Ryan Walker) Agent: Thrower Design (Ron Thrower) Request: SF-3-NP to MF-3-NP, as amended. Staff Rec.: Recommended Staff: Heather Chaffin, 512-974-2122, heather.chaffin@austintexas.gov Planning and Zoning Department]

UH, MOVING ON OUR FIRST DISCUSSION ITEM IS THE EAST MLK REZONING AT, UH, DID YOU TWO OR ONE EAST MARTIN LUTHER KING JR.

BOULEVARD.

UM, DO WE HAVE, UH, THE STAFF ON THE LINE? YEAH.

HEATHER CHAFFIN PLANNING AND ZONING.

RIGHT.

[01:00:01]

GREAT.

I'M GOING TO BE A LITTLE QUICK ON THE INTRO TO THIS.

I'VE HEARD IT BEFORE.

IT'S KATE'S C 14 2020 DASH OH THREE ONE PAGE.

THEY REQUESTED SCANNING FROM SF THREE NP.

ORIGINALLY THEY WERE REQUESTING M F AND P THE APPLICANT REVIVED THE REQUEST ON FRIDAY THROUGH REQUEST M F LEE AND T IT'S A 2.6 ACRES ON THE FALL SIDE AND I'LL PAY, UM, OH, IT'S ALSO PROPOSED TO BE A SMART HOUSING PROJECT.

THE PROPOSED REZONING FOR MS AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF WAS APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION ON THE 23RD.

HOWEVER, LATER IN THE MEETING, THE, THERE WAS A MOTION TO RECONSIDER THE MEETING AND MAYBE DISCUSS IT FURTHER.

THAT'S ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF EAST MLK ABOUT HALFWAY BETWEEN SPRINGDALE ROAD AND TANNAHILL LANE.

IT'S MOSTLY SURROUNDED BY SF THREE NP, BUT THERE IS A COMMERCIAL AND OTHER MORE INTENSE, UH, USES AND ZONING IN A WIDER VICINITY.

THIS IS DESIGNATED ON THE FLINT FUTURE LAND USE MAP AS MIXED RESIDENTIAL MIXED RESIDENTIAL ALLOWS AND ALLOWS MS. THREE ALLOWS ALL THE SINGLE FAMILY CATEGORIES.

IT DOES NOT REQUIRE THAT EACH DEVELOPMENT BE MIX OF RESIDENTIAL USES.

THERE IS ELSEWHERE AND DRY THAT OTHER AS OF THIS PROPERTY, UH, THIS HAS BEEN, THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT.

ATD HAS REVIEWED THE PROJECT AND DETERMINED THAT AN EXTENSION IT IS NOT REQUIRED.

IT'S NOT IN ANY OF THE BUDGET PLANNING.

AND, UM, THIS IS KIND OF A REMNANT OF THE CLASS AND THE 1960S ALSO NEIGHBORHOOD OPINION OR INPUT HAS BEEN, THEY DO NOT AN EXTENSION THROUGH THEIR ATD, HAS NO FUNDING FOR IT, AND IT'S NOT DESIRED BY THE NEIGHBORHOOD STAFF IS SUPPORTING AND THAT REZONING AND THAT ZONING IS OFF THE TABLE.

ONCE AN APPLICANT HAS MODIFIED THEIR ZONING REQUESTS, HE CAN'T CONSIDER ANYTHING HIGHER THAN THAT.

I ALSO HAVE A ENVIRONMENTAL STAFF HERE ON THE LINE AND, UH, AFFORDABLE HOUSING NEIGHBORHOOD, HOUSE STAFF.

YOU'RE ON THE LINE FOR ANY QUESTION.

GREAT.

THANK YOU, MS. CHAFFIN, UM, LIKE TO HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT AT THIS POINT, AND, UH, JUST AS A REMINDER TO EVERYBODY THIS, UH, ORIGINALLY, I CAN'T REMEMBER IF IT WAS, DIDN'T HAVE SUFFICIENT, UH, SOME BOASTS FORWARD, THEN YOU BROUGHT IT TO SITTER.

SO THAT'S WHY I'M SEEING A BUNCH OF SPINNING VIDEOS.

SO I'M THINKING MAYBE I CUT OUT FOR A SECOND.

UM, JUST AS A REMINDER TO EVERYBODY, UH, THIS, UM, WE HAD THIS CASE, UH, IT DIDN'T HAVE SUFFICIENT VOTES TO MOVE FORWARD AND THERE WAS A MOTION TO RE UH, AND THAT'S THREE DA, UM, AND WE'RE TAKEN UP NOW.

SO IF I CAN ASK THAT TO MAYBE SPEAK TO CONCERNS FROM THE LAST MEETING OR ADD NEW INFORMATION AND THEIR TIME, GO AHEAD, KENNY, KENNY, UH, WHEN IT WAS APPROVED ON MF THREE, IT DID HAVE SUFFICIENT, BUT CAN WE AFFORD IT? WAS IT AN EIGHT TO THREE? AND THEN THERE WAS THE VOTE TO RECONSIDER IT, RIGHT.

I BELIEVE THE WAS SIX OR SOMETHING.

HEY GUYS, IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT THE CAMPUS IS, CORRECT.

THE REQUEST FOR MS. THREE WAS THE FIRST MOTION, OR I'M SORRY.

YEAH.

AND THAT'S WHERE HE WAS THE FIRST MOTION AS THERE WAS A SUBSTITUTE MOTION CENTS.

AND AT THIS POINT, THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST IS ONLY EMISSARY.

OKAY.

UM, SO WE, WE CAN HEAR FROM THE AFRICAN AT THIS POINT, THE APPLICANT IS AGREEING NOW WITH THE MF THREE THAT WAS APPROVED BY COMMISSION LAST TIME.

SO, UM, UH, APPLICANT SPEAK TO, TO WHAT YOU WANT TO SPEAK TO, I GUESS, GO AHEAD.

SAUCY, ARE YOU IN LINE? I CAN HEAR YOU NOW.

GO AHEAD.

[01:05:01]

OKAY.

I'M TO MAKE SURE TO TURN DOWN YOUR TV, IF YOU HAVE THIS GONE.

OKAY.

YUP.

YUP.

GOT THAT.

OKAY.

UM, SO I REALLY, WE REALLY DON'T HAVE MUCH TO ADD AND JUST THAT AFTER LAST HEARING, UM, WE MET WITH AUDUBON SOCIETY.

WE TRIED TO, UH, TRY TO SEE IF WE CAN COME TOGETHER ON THAT.

UM, AND IN THE END, UH, THE, THE PROPERTY OWNER DECIDED THAT THEY DIDN'T WANT TO FIGHT THE UPHILL BATTLE AND DECIDED TO GO WITH .

OKAY.

THAT'S FINE.

OKAY.

ALRIGHT.

UM, SO, UH, UH, THAT IS THE APPLICANT, UM, WHO IS NOW, UH, AGREEING TO THE, UH, STAFF RECOMMENDATION.

UM, CAN WE NOW HEAR FROM, I HAVE MARKED, UH, NICOLE WEBB, ANOTHER TERM, UM, UP AS THE THERE'S ANOTHER 10.

ARE YOU THE PRIMARY SPEAKER IN OPPOSITION? I'M SORRY, THAT WAS IN FAVOR.

I'M SORRY, ADAM.

I'M SORRY, NICOLE.

I WAS LOOKING AT THE WRONG LIST.

UM, UH, DO I HAVE ADAM SHARP ON THE LINE? IS ADAM SHARP? CAN Y'ALL HEAR ME GOOD? YES.

GO AHEAD.

OKAY.

WELL, YEAH, I'M ADAM SHARP.

I'M THE PRESIDENT OF THE STONE GATE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.

AND I'M, AGAIN, I'M REPRESENTING OVER 65 HOUSEHOLDS.

MANY OF WHOM ARE VERY DISAPPOINTED AND CONFUSED BY THE DECISION TO THIS COMMISSION.

IT'S BEEN A BAFFLING FEW WEEKS FOR US TO UNDERSTAND WHAT'S GOING ON.

AT FIRST, WE THOUGHT THE COMMISSION HAD DENIED THE MSX SIX DESIGNATION ONLY TO FIND OUT AT THE FOUR HOUR AND 45 MINUTE MARK OF THE MEETING THAT THIS APPLICATION WAS INEXPLICABLY BROUGHT UP FOR A REBOOT, A MOVE THAT CAN ONLY BE DESCRIBED AS SKETCHY AS A BLACK FRIDAY.

THE APPLICANT HAS AMENDED A REQUEST DOWN TO MS THREE, WHICH IS STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION, BUT WE NEVER A FEW QUESTIONS THAT I OWE IT TO MY NEIGHBORS TO ASK YOU TO PLEASE HELP US OUT.

I WAS REMISS LAST TIME AND NOT FULLY EXPLAINING TO YOU THE ONLY CONTACT WE HAD ABOUT THE SITE, BUT IN FEBRUARY, THE APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE, PAT MISHAP ASKED IF I COULD SET UP A MEETING AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO SEEK SUPPORT FOR 200 UNITS.

AFTER THAT MEETING, I DID NOT HEAR FROM THEM UNTIL MAY 22ND, WHICH WAS FOUR DAYS BEFORE THE COMMISSION TO MAKE A DECISION ON THIS PROPERTY, THIS LESSON, A MASS CONFUSION THROUGHOUT THE NEIGHBORHOOD ON WHAT THEY WERE PLANNING.

AND WE'RE ALL NEW AT THIS.

WE ARE NOT CLEAR ABOUT THE FULL EXTENT OF WHAT MS THREE WOULD ALLOW.

AND WHETHER THIS APPLICANT RYAN WALKER, UH, IS MEANT TO BE THE END USER AND DEVELOPED THIS TRACK, OR IS THIS A REZONING FOR A CLIENT