Link

Social

Embed

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[00:00:04]

WE, WE ARE READY TO GO, UM, IS SIX, 10, AND WE'RE GOING TO CALL THE ORDER.

EVERYBODY CAN HEAR ME.

YES.

ALL RIGHT.

GREAT.

UM, SO WE ARE, UH, I'M GOING TO TRY SOMETHING A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT TONIGHT.

UH, IF I CAN GET UNANIMOUS CONSENT, UM, BECAUSE MOST OF THE SPEAKERS THAT WE HAVE SIGNED UP FOR THE FIRST THREE ITEMS, UM, WISHED TO SPEAK ON ALL THREE ITEMS AND NOT JUST EACH INDIVIDUALLY, I WOULD LIKE TO GIVE THEM THE OPTION TO, UM, SPEAK TO ALL THREE ITEMS AT THE BEGINNING OF THE FIRST ITEM, BUT OFFER THEM ADDITIONAL TIME, OFFER THEM DOUBLE THEIR NORMAL TIME.

UM, UH, I THINK THAT MIGHT FACILITATE GETTING THROUGH THEM BECAUSE I THINK A LOT OF THE DISCUSSION ABOUT THE ITEMS IS, IS, UH, IS THE SAME FOR ALL THREE CASES.

UM, ARE THERE ANY, UH, OBJECTIONS TO TAKING THIS APPROACH? OKAY.

UM, MAYBE THEY WON'T USE ALL OF IT, BUT WE'LL SEE.

YES, GO AHEAD.

IS IT ALL OF THE SAME APPLICANTS? SAME LANDOWNER.

I MEAN, THEY ARE DIFFERENT LANDOWNERS, SO WE CAN'T TAKE ALL THREE CASES AT ONCE.

AND, UH, UH, I WOULD ASK THE APPLICANT TO PRESENT EACH SEPARATELY.

UM, BUT RATHER THAN, UM, REPEAT THE SAME COMMENTS ALL THREE TIMES, BECAUSE ALL OF OUR SPEAKERS, IF THEIR COMMENTS ARE GENERAL TO ALL THREE, I'D LIKE TO OFFER THEM SOME ADDITIONAL TIME AND LET THEM MAKE THEIR MORE EXTENDED COMMENT RIGHT THERE AT THE BEGINNING, INSTEAD OF REPEATING THE SAME POINTS THREE TIMES.

DO WE KNOW IF THE APPLICANT'S OKAY WITH THIS? THE APPLICANT IS OK WITH IT.

UM, ALL RIGHT.

SO,

[Reading of the Agenda]

UH, I'M GOING TO READ THE CONSENT AGENDA.

UM, WE HAVE, UH, A ONE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES, UM, CASE, UH, B ONE IS FOR DISCUSSION B TWO FOR DISCUSSION B THREE FOR DISCUSSION BEFORE FOR DISCUSSION, BE FIVE FOR DISCUSSION.

UM, B6 CONSENT APPLICANT POSTPONEMENT TIL, UH, 11 AUGUST 11TH.

THAT IS NPA 2020 ZERO ZERO ONE 4.017.

UM, OH ONE, FOUR OH ONE.

FORGIVE ME.

I HAVE A NEW, UH, PHONE HERE.

UM, COMMISSIONER HEMPEL IS ABSENT.

I WAS GOING TO ASK TO NOTE.

UM, SO AGAIN, B6 NPA 2020 ZERO ZERO ONE FOUR OH ONE AT SEVEN ONE THREE FIVE EAST BEN WHITE BOULEVARD.

UH, HAS AN APPLICANT POSTPONE IT TILL AUGUST 11TH.

THAT IS FOR CONSENT.

UM, ITEM B SEVEN APPLICANT POSTPONED UNTIL AUGUST 11TH FOR CONSENT.

THAT'S A CASE C 14 2020 DASH ZERO ZERO FOUR TWO.

THAT'S AT 71 35 EAST BEN WHITE BOULEVARD.

SAME LOCATION.

UM, ITEM B EIGHT.

WE'RE GOING TO DISCUSS POSTPONEMENT ITEM A B NINE, UM, UH, OFFER FOR CONSENT.

THAT IS C 14 DASH 2019 DASH OH ONE OH EIGHT PARKER HOUSE.

UM, WE CONSENT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION, UM, ITEM B 10 IS GOING TO BE A DISCUSSION POSTPONEMENT, UM, ITEM D 11 AS A DISCUSSION ITEM, B12 C 14 2020 ZERO ZERO SIX FOUR IT'S 6,007, AGE 35 RESIDENCES.

UH, THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS OFFERED FOR CONSENT.

UM, ITEM B 13, REZONING C 14 2020 ZERO ZERO ZERO SEVEN, 2001 GUADALUPE STREET, UH, INDUSTRY NINE THAT IS OFFERED FOR CONSENT APPLICANT POSTPONEMENT TILL AUGUST 11TH.

UM, ITEMS C 14 A OR B 14, WHICH IS C 14 2020 ZERO ZERO FIVE TWO AT NINE OH THREE WEST 12TH STREET.

UH, THAT ITEM IS, UH, THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS OFTEN FOR CONSENT ITEMS. SEE 15, UM, SEE 14 ZERO FIVE ZERO ONE ONE TWO RCA TO THE EMILY SOUTH SHORE.

UM, UH, WE'RE OFFERING A NEIGHBORHOOD POSTPONE UNTIL AUGUST 25TH, UH, FOR CONSENT.

UM, APPLICANT IS IN AGREEMENT ITEM B 16 SITE PLAN SPC 2020 ZERO ZERO SEVEN SIX.

A VACANCY BREWERY.

THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS OFFERED FOR CONSENT ITEM B 17, A S P 2019 ZERO FIVE NINE ONE C AT NINE 24 EAST SEVENTH STREET DEVELOPMENT.

UH, THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS OFFERED FOR CONSENT ITEM B 18 C EIGHT 2019 ZERO ZERO SIX 2.0, A RESUB DIVISION OF LOT, THREE LESS WEST 53 FEET.

BETTER OF BLOCK TO MAGNOLIA ADDITION.

THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS OFFERED FOR CONSENT ITEM.

, UH, CHEROKEE SUBDIVISION LOCATED AT 1103 CHURKO STREET.

[00:05:01]

UH, THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS OFFERED FOR CONSENT.

UM, ITEM B 20 CA 2019 ZERO ONE ONE 4.18, THE SIMON CASKEY FINAL PLAT.

WE'RE SEEING THIS ONE AGAIN.

UH, STAFF IS RECOMMENDING DISAPPROVAL WITH REASONS, UM, PER THE BACKUP AND THAT IS OFFERED FOR CONSENT.

UM, MAYBE ONE DAY THAT CASE WILL FINALLY BE RESOLVED.

UM, ITEM B 21, UH, CODE AMENDMENT DEMOLITION PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.

UH, THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS OFFERED FOR CONSENT AND, UM, THE, APPARENTLY YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT THESE PHONES EVERY TIME ANYONE TURN OFF, UM, ITEM B 22, WE'RE GOING TO DO, UH, THE STREET IMPACT FEES.

THAT IS FOR, UM, A DISCUSSION.

AND I'VE BEEN REMINDED TO NOTE THAT THE, UH, THE SIGN CASSIE TRIED TO BE 20 THERE.

UH, IT'S DISPROVAL WITH REASONS IN PER EXHIBIT C, UM, FOR THE RECORD.

UM, SO JUST TO REVIEW THE CONSENT AGENDA AND EVERYTHING ELSE IS, IS, UH, DISCUSSION, INCLUDING SOME POSTPONEMENTS, UH,

[Consent Agenda]

ON THE CONSENT AGENDA, ITEM B SIX, UH, AS A CONSENT POSTPONEMENT BY THE APPLICANT TIL AUGUST 11TH, ITEM B SEVEN, UM, CONSENT APPLICANT POSTPONE UNTIL AUGUST 11TH, UH, B NINE, UM, STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS OFFERED FOR CONSENT.

UM, UM, B 12 STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS OFFERED FOR CONSENT ITEM.

THE 13 APPLICANT POSTPONED UNTIL AUGUST 11TH IS OFFERED FOR CONSENT.

ITEM B 14.

A STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS OFFERED FOR CONSENT ITEM B 15, A NEIGHBORHOOD POSTPONE UNTIL AUGUST 25TH IS OFFERED FOR CONSENT.

ITEM B 16 STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS OFFERED FOR CONSENT ITEM B 17 STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS OFFERED FOR CONSENT ITEM B 18 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS OFFERED FOR CONSENT ITEM B 19 STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS OFFERED FOR CONSENT ITEM.

A DISAPPROVAL FOR REASONS AS REFLECTED IN EXHIBIT C.

THE STAFF REPORT IS OFFERED FOR CONSENT AND ITEM B 21, UH, CODE AMENDMENT DEMOLITION PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS OFFERED FOR CONSENT.

DO ANY COMMISSIONERS WISH TO PULL ANY ITEMS FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA? POINT OF CLARIFICATION? OKAY, LET'S GET THE CLARIFICATION OF QUESTION OR THOMPSON, AND WE'LL GO TO YOUR COMMISSIONER SCHNEIDER, GO AHEAD AND PUSH YOUR THOMPSON.

J B NINE.

I THINK ON MY VERSION OF THE AGENDA, IT SORT OF SAYS RECOMMENDED WITH CONDITIONS AND IT HAS THE S SLASH THROUGH THE CONDITIONS, BUT I THINK THERE WERE SOME DIFFERENCES IN THE CONDITIONS OF WHAT THE APPLICANT REQUESTED VERSUS WHAT STAFF RECOMMENDED IN TERMS OF SETBACK.

CAN WE JUST GET CLARIFICATION ON WHAT WE'RE PUTTING ON THIS, MR. VERA, CAN YOU CHIME IN HERE? IT'S ONLY THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION INCLUDED A SETBACK THAT NO LONGER IS THE CASE.

SO IT'S STAFF RECOMMENDED WITHOUT THE CONDITION IT'S AGREED UPON BY ALL PARTIES.

SO THE RECOMMENDATION IS, UH, THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION WITHOUT CONDITIONS DO RECOMMENDING THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST OR CORRECT? CORRECT.

OKAY.

OKAY.

COMMISSIONER SCHNEIDER.

UH, I, UH, ALSO HAD A QUESTION BENIGN.

THERE WERE SOME NOTES THAT SAID ALL PARTIES WERE IN AGREEMENT.

I UNDERSTOOD THAT THE, UM, THE HISTORIC COMMISSION COMMISSION, SORRY, GETTING THE NAME WRONG, UH, THAT THEY RECOMMENDED DISAPPROVAL OF THIS.

AND SO I WONDERED, UH, IF THEY WERE DISAPPROVING, IS IT APPROPRIATE TO HAVE THIS ON OUR CONSENT AGENDA? THAT'S AN EXCELLENT QUESTION.

UH, MR. BARRY, CAN YOU ADVISE IT'S A MERE RECOMMENDATION FROM HLC.

OKAY.

SO, UM, WE WOULD BE GOING AGAINST, UH, THE HLC RECOMMENDATION IF WE, UH, APPROVE THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION.

IS THAT CORRECT? MR. RIVERA SHOW? THAT'S GREAT.

OKAY.

SO, UM, DO WE WANT TO PULL THAT ONE FOR DISCUSSION THEN? DO WE HAVE ANYONE FROM THIS OR A COMMISSION WHO CAN COMMENT? I'M NOT SURE IF WE HAVE ANYONE FROM THE COMMISSION, BUT MR. BIRD, WE HAVE STAFF AVAILABLE FOR THAT ITEM.

I DO, ALTHOUGH I DON'T HAVE THE APPLICANT SIGNED UP,

[00:10:01]

SO WE WOULD HAVE TO POSTPONE TO AUGUST 11TH.

UM, CAN WE, UH, GET, I BELIEVE AT THIS POINT WHERE WE CAN HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF DISCUSSION ABOUT, UM, UH, THE ITEMS, IS THAT CORRECT MR. RIVERA? UH, IN TERMS OF WHETHER OR NOT TO POSTPONE THAT I'D SUGGEST HAVING IT AS THE DISCUSSION POST AFTER THE CONSENT AGENDA.

OKAY.

WELL, WE'LL DO DISCUSSION POSTPONEMENT AFTER THE CONSENT AGENDA.

DOES THAT SIT WELL WITH YOU? OKAY, GREAT.

A QUESTION AGAIN, IS BURRITO.

DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING I CAN DO IT? I JUST, I ALSO HAD A QUESTION ABOUT, ARE ALL PARTIES IN AGREEMENT, GIVEN THE FACT THAT WE RECEIVED A LETTER FROM KEN PAK, UH, UNANIMOUSLY SUPPORTING UNIVERSITY AREA PARTNERS RECOMMENDATION AGAINST THE ZONING CHANGE PROPOSED.

SO I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE I GET A CHANCE TO DISCUSS IT.

ALRIGHT, WE'LL TAKE THAT UP THEN.

UM, ANY OTHER COMMISSIONERS WAS TO PULL OR HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT ANY ITEMS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA? I'M SEEING NONE.

UH, DO WE HAVE ANY RECUSALS? NONE.

OKAY.

ALL RIGHT.

UM, DO I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA? LIKE MR. KASI SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER THOMPSON ALL IN FAVOR, GO GREEN.

ALRIGHT.

THAT IS UNANIMOUS.

UM, SURE.

COMMISSION LEAKS ON EVERYTHING CLEARLY CAUSING THE PUBLIC HEARINGS WERE ETHICAL.

YES.

AND THAT WAS CLOSING AND PUBLIC HEARINGS WERE APPLICABLE.

UM, LET'S JUST DO THAT AGAIN AND MAKE IT FORMAL.

UM, UH, ALL IN FAVOR OF THE AMENDED MOTION.

UH, MR. CAUSEY, DOES THAT SIT WELL WITH YOU TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARINGS AS WELL? FOR SURE.

THOMPSON DOES THAT SO WELL WITH YOU? YES.

OKAY.

EVERYONE GO GREEN OR AG COMMISSIONER C.

OKAY.

THERE YOU GO.

ALRIGHT.

UM,

[B8. Rezoning: C14-2020-0062 - Webberville; District 1]

LET'S MOVE ON TO DISCUSSION POSTPONEMENTS.

WE HAVE A COUPLE OF THOSE.

UM, LET'S GO DOWN THE LIST.

UM, LET'S START WITH ITEM B EIGHT, WHICH IS C 14 2020 ZERO ZERO SIX TWO WEAVERVILLE ROAD.

MS. CHAFFIN, ARE YOU WITH US SHARE? WE CAN GO STRAIGHT TO THE SPEAKERS.

AH, OKAY.

ALL RIGHT.

UM, LET ME PULL THAT UP THEN.

ALRIGHT.

UM, ITEM THE EIGHT.

UH, WE HAVE THE APPLICANT, JARED KORBEL.

ARE YOU ON THE LINE AS A REMINDER TO EVERYONE ON THE LINE, YOU HIT STAR SIX TO UNMUTE YOURSELF.

POINT OF ORDER.

YEAH, GO AHEAD.

CAN YOU HEAR ME? THAT'S A REQUEST THAT THE PARTY THAT'S REQUESTING THE POSTPONEMENT SPEAK FIRST.

THAT IS A, IS A GOOD POINT.

UM, I BELIEVE THAT'S CORRECT.

MR. RIVERA, IS THAT YOUR UNDERSTANDING AS WELL? COMMISSIONER SCRATCHER, MR. VERA, WE ARE HAVING RECEPTION PROBLEMS WITH YOU TONIGHT.

THE COMMISSIONER IS CORRECT.

OKAY.

ALRIGHT.

UM, LET'S GO THEN.

UH, THE ONLY OPPOSITION I HAVE SIGNED UP IS ADAM SHARP.

MR. SHARP, ARE YOU ON THE LINE? YEAH, THIS IS ADAM SHARP.

CAN YOU GUYS HEAR ME LOUD AND CLEAR? YOU CAN GO AHEAD.

UM, YOU HAVE, I GUESS SIX MINUTES IF YOU WANT IT.

OKAY.

I DON'T THINK I'LL NEED SIX MINUTES, BUT, UM, GOOD.

I'M SORRY, MR. SHARP.

HOLD ON.

WE HAVE STEPH INTERJECTING.

HOLD ON JUST ONE SECOND, MR. SHARP.

YES.

MR. RIVERA.

OKAY.

SURE.

THAT'S TWO INDIVIDUALS FROM EACH SIDE AT TWO MINUTES, EACH TWO MINUTES EACH.

OKAY.

FOR POSTPONEMENTS.

ALL RIGHT.

OKAY, GO AHEAD, MR. SHARP, YOU HAVE TWO MINUTES.

OKAY.

THIS IS ADAM SHARP PRESENT IN THE STONE GATE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.

AND I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT WE POSTPONE THIS CASE UNTIL SEPTEMBER 8TH.

THE NEXT MEETING OF THE STONE GATE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION IS AUGUST 19TH AND THE EAST MLK CONTACT TEAMS. NEXT MEETING IS AUGUST 17TH.

MAYBE REMEMBER, REMEMBER MY VOICE FROM TWO CASES AT YOUR LAST TWO MEETINGS THAT ARE LOCATED IN THE SAME AREA AS THIS WEBER BELT CASE, OUR 8% MINORITY NEIGHBORHOOD IS FACING A DELUSION OF UP ZONING.

A LOT OF IT'S SPECULATIVE ALL AT ONCE DURING THE PANDEMIC.

ALL THESE CASES WILL IMPACT THIS HISTORIC NEIGHBORHOOD FOREVER.

AND I DO BELIEVE WE SHOULD BE AFFORDED THE TIME TO ANALYZE THESE PLANS.

WE ONLY JUST LEARNED ABOUT THE PROPOSAL FROM 1907, BY PREVAIL THREE TO FOUR WEEKS AGO, WHILE ALSO DEALING WITH TWO OTHER HUGE DEVELOPMENT.

THIS DEVELOPMENT WAS BRIEFLY INTRODUCED AT THE END OF THE EAST MLK CONTACTING MEETING ON

[00:15:01]

JULY 20TH.

AT THIS TIME AT THE TIME, NEIGHBORS INDICATED THAT THE CASE LOOKS COMPLICATED AND WE NEED TIME TO ANALYZE WHAT IS CURRENTLY PERMITTED VERSUS WHAT IS PROPOSED.

WE DON'T HAVE ALL THE INFORMATION YET, AND WE SURE NEED TIME TO UNDERSTAND IT.

PLEASE KNOW THAT THE SAC REPORT IN THIS CASE, OH, MISS, WHAT SHOULD BE A MA A MATERIAL PIECE OF INFORMATION FOR YOUR DELIBERATION? IT DOES NOT TELL YOU THAT A CONDITIONAL USE SITE PLAN FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THIS TRACK AS A NEIGHBORHOOD URBAN CENTER WITH 86 UNITS WAS APPROVED IN 2016.

AND IT DOES NOT TELL YOU OR THE PUBLIC THAT APPARENTLY NOW THEIR REQUIREMENTS OF THIS APPROVED SITE PLAN ARE A PROBLEM FOR THE APPLICANT AND CURRENT OWNERS.

THOSE DETAILS ARE PRETTY IMPORTANT TO THE NEIGHBORS TO DIGEST.

AND I WOULD HOPE FOR YOU.

AND AGAIN, THIS I PLAN WAS FOR 86 UNITS WAS PASSED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON THE CON ON CONSENT IN 2016, NO ONE TOLD US THAT THIS WAS HAPPENING.

AND NOW WE'RE LOOKING AT ANOTHER BIG CHANGE OF THE PROPERTY THAT WOULD ALLOW 130 UNITS INSTEAD OF 86.

AND THIS AND THIS AND THIS CASE HAS EVEN SAID FOR CONSENT TO NO ONE EVEN TOLD US IT WAS ON THE AGENDA TONIGHT.

THIS IS NOT FEEL LIKE HOW OFTEN SEDITION SHOULD BE TREATED.

NO REAL NOTICE, NO REAL EXPLANATION ABOUT WHAT, WHY AND HOW JUST MORE IMPACT APPROVED WITHOUT INFORMED PARTICIPATION.

OKAY.

THANK YOU, MR. , JARED KORBEL ON THE LINE.

GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS.

UH, JARED CORVELLE WITH STORYVILLE.

CAN YOU, CAN YOU HEAR ME OKAY? YES.

GO AHEAD.

YOU HAVE TWO MINUTES.

GREAT.

OKAY.

THANKS GUYS.

UH, ADAM, I APPRECIATE THE COMMENTS.

UH, I THINK OUR ONLY REBUTTAL TO THAT IS, UH, WE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH, UH, THE HOFFMAN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION SINCE OCTOBER OF 2019, UH, OUT OF COURTESY TO THE STONE GATE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, WHICH IS, UH, ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT.

UH, ADAM AND I SPOKE AND I SENT OVER ADAM, UH, A PRESENTATION ON JUNE 19TH, UH, EXPLAINING KIND OF WHAT OUR PROPOSAL WAS FROM, UH, FROM A ZONING STANDPOINT.

AND REALLY THE, THE SHORT MATTER IS WE'RE NOT PROPOSING ADDITIONAL DENSITY OR A WHILE, WHILE IT IS AN UP ZONE FROM SF THREE NP TO SF SIX.

UM, AND THERE IS, UH, AN APPROVED PLAN FOR 86 UNITS.

UH, CURRENT ENTITLEMENTS ALLOW THAT PROJECT TO GET UP TO OVER A HUNDRED UNITS AND PER THE PRESENTATION WE WOULD BE PREPARED TO DISCUSS, UH, WE'RE ONLY PROPOSING 103 UNITS, AND WE ARE ALSO, UH, READY TO DEDICATE SOME AFFORDABILITY UNITS, UH, TO THE PROJECT.

AND SO I GUESS OUR CONCERN IS SINCE WE GAVE THIS INFORMATION TO STONE GATE, UH, ALMOST 50 DAYS AGO, UM, WE HAVEN'T REALLY HAD, UH, A LOT OF, UH, RECEPTION FROM STONE GATE.

I'VE BEEN KIND OF ASKING AND TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHEN THE INFORMATION WAS GOING TO BE SENT OUT SO THEY COULD HAVE A DISCUSSION ON IT.

AND WE HAVEN'T GOTTEN ANY FEEDBACK.

THE LAST CORRESPONDENCE I GOT WAS, UH, JUNE 23RD, AND I HAVE SPOKEN TO THE, UH, THE EAST MLK, UH, CONTACT TEAM, UH, BACK IN OCTOBER AS WELL.

AND THE PROBLEM THAT WE HAD WITH THE HOG PEN WAS NOT ENOUGH PUBLIC PARTICIPATION, SO THEY WEREN'T ABLE TO MAKE A VOTE.

SO THE MLK CONTACT TEAM WAS GOING TO TRY TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION ON HOW THEY COULD PROCEED.

UM, GIVEN THE FACT THAT WE'VE ALSO, WE'VE GOTTEN KIND OF SOME, SOME PERSONAL, UH, VOTES OF COMPETENCE IN THE PROJECT.

SO JUST THAT LATER, I DON'T KNOW THAT SEPTEMBER IS NECESSARY.

THANK YOU, MR. CORVELLE THAT THAT'S YOUR TIME, UM, COMMISSIONER SECRET.

I SEE YOUR HAND UP, UH, YOU'RE MUTED.

HOLD ON, GO AHEAD.

IN THE BEGINNING, BECAUSE I HAVE THIS APP LATE THIS AFTERNOON, I REQUESTED BECAUSE THE REASON IS THAT I JUST RECEIVED INFORMATION TODAY ABOUT THE EXISTING SITE PLAN AND THE CUP ON THAT PROPERTY.

AND I REALLY WANTED TO LOOK INTO WHAT IS A NEIGHBORHOOD URBAN CENTER.

YES.

WHICH IS WHAT'S ON IT NOW WITH THE SEAT.

SO I WANTED MORE TIME.

OKAY.

ANY OTHER COMMISSIONERS WITH THE QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS, QUESTIONS, SHEA.

SO, UM, IT SOUNDS LIKE THE NEIGHBORS SAID THAT THEY WEREN'T NOTIFIED THAT THIS WAS GOING TO BE ON TODAY'S AGENDA.

CAN STAFF TALK ABOUT, UH, THE NOTIFICATION, CAUSE I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT WENT OUT TO ALL THE INTERESTED PARTIES AND STUFF.

UH, TELL US A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THAT, THAT THE NOTIFICATION, WAS IT PROPERLY NOTIFIED MS. CHAFFIN ON THE LINE?

[00:20:10]

UM, WHILE WE MAY BE WAITING FOR MS. CHEFF AND, UH, I HAVE A QUESTION FOR, UH, OF APPLICANT, MR. CORBELL.

UM, GO AHEAD.

GO AHEAD.

AND SCHEFFING YES.

UH, AGAIN, HEATHER CHAPMAN PLANNING AND ZONING, ALL MODIFICATION REQUIRED FOR THIS WAS DONE PROPERLY AND ON TIME, THE NOTICE OF FILING THE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AS REQUIRED.

OKAY.

AND THEN WHAT TIME? OKAY.

AND THEN, UM, THIS IS THE FIRST POSTPONEMENT REQUEST BY ANY SITES, IS THAT CORRECT? I MEAN, NOBODY'S HAD A PROPOSAL ON THAT BEFORE, CORRECT.

OKAY.

ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU.

RIGHT.

AND I HAD A QUESTION FOR MR. CORBELL THE APPLICANT, IS THERE SOMETHING PARTICULAR TO THIS PROJECT THAT, UM, IS, IS PARTICULARLY TIME SENSITIVE? I MEAN, UH, I UNDERSTAND SOME OF THE, UH, FRUSTRATIONS YOU'RE EXPRESSING HERE, BUT, YOU KNOW, WE, WE DO TYPICALLY IT IS OUR PRACTICE AT THIS POINT TO OFFER A POSTPONE AT THE REQUEST OF A, OF A NEIGHBORHOOD GROUP.

AND, UM, YOU KNOW, THIS, THIS BEING COVID THINGS OR THINGS ARE A LITTLE, UH, OFF KILTER.

UM, IS THERE SOMETHING SPECIAL ABOUT THIS CASE AND IN THE NEXT TWO WEEKS? WELL, THERE THERE'S NOT, BUT I, I THINK MY BIGGEST ISSUE IS A MID SEPTEMBER HEARING.

I AM, I'M CERTAINLY OKAY WITH A POSTPONEMENT.

I JUST DON'T WANT TO WAIT ANOTHER 45 DAYS.

AND QUITE HONESTLY, UH, BASED ON THE CORRESPONDENCE THAT WE'RE HAVING SO FAR, MY COMPETENCE LEVEL IS, UH, IS JUST A LITTLE BIT LOW, UH, BASED ON THE LACK OF RESPONSES.

SO I AM CERTAINLY UNDERSTANDING AND, AND WILLING TO, TO, TO BE ON BOARD WITH A POSTPONEMENT.

I WOULD JUST RATHER NOT GO TO, UH, MID SEPTEMBER.

UM, MR. RIVERA, MS. CHEN, CAN YOU FYS, UH, A NEIGHBORHOOD POSTPONEMENT TILL SEPTEMBER 8TH IS A LITTLE LONG, UH, UM, WHY ARE WE LOOKING AT SEPTEMBER 8TH INSTEAD OF, UH, SAY OUR NEXT MEETING? CAN I TALK ON PLANNING AND ZONING? THIS IS WHAT WAS REQUESTED BY THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

I WERE LOOKING AT THAT THERE ARE, THERE ARE ALTERNATIVE BEFORE THEN THERE WAS AUGUST A LETTER AND AUGUST 21ST.

OKAY.

UM, MR. SHARP, ARE YOU STILL ON THE LINE? UM, SEPTEMBER 8TH IS A, IS A HECK OF A DELAY THERE.

UM, WHEN WE, WHEN WE'RE NOT ACTUALLY SURE, IF THERE ARE ANY ISSUES, UM, DO YOU THINK THAT WE COULD GET THIS DONE AND TWO OR FOUR WEEKS, UH, WITH YOUR, UM, WITH THE CONSULTATIONS? YEAH, THE, THE REASON FOR THE LONGER POSTPONEMENT IS BECAUSE OF THAT, YOU KNOW, THE MEETINGS THAT ARE ON THE BOOKS THAT DON'T GAY NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS, NOT GOING TO MEET UNTIL THE 19TH AND THEN THE ETHAN OKAY.

CONTACT A TEAM MEETING.

IT'S NOT UNTIL THE 17TH.

SO I WOULD WANT JUST, YOU KNOW, SOME ADDITIONAL TIME AFTER THOSE MEETINGS TO FURTHER DISCUSS WITH MY ACTUAL WORK KNOW WITH THE NEIGHBORS, UM, WHAT, WHAT HAPPENS IN THOSE MEETINGS.

AND I JUST WANT TO POINT OUT THAT, YOU KNOW, I'M, I FEEL LIKE I'VE BEEN AT ALL OF THESE MEETINGS THESE LAST COUPLE OF WEEKS, BUT YOU HAVE TO UNDERSTAND THAT WE ARE COMPLETELY OVERWHELMED WITH THESE MEETING REQUESTS AND THESE ZONING CHANGES, AND IT TAKES TIME.

WE WERE NOT THE ZONING PROFESSIONALS.

THIS IS NOT, THIS IS NOT SOMETHING THAT A LOT OF US HAVE A LOT OF NO FIRSTHAND KNOWLEDGE.

SO I DO THINK ALLOWING THIS TIME, BECAUSE I DO THINK WE'RE GETTING BETTER AT IT, TO BE HONEST, BUT, UM, DO WE JUST LIKE A LITTLE ADDITIONAL TIME, BECAUSE WE HAVE, WE HAVE CITY COUNCIL THINGS THAT ARE GOING ON THIS WEEK.

AND SO, YEAH, WE JUST NEED, WE JUST LEAVE THIS EXTRA TIME.

ALSO, THIS, THIS HAS JUST BEEN SITTING VACANT FOR FOUR YEARS, SO I DON'T SEE WHAT THE RUSH IS TO GET IT DONE.

YOU KNOW, OTHER DIFFERENCES A MONTH FROM NOW.

ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU, MR. SHARP.

BUT, UH, BUT, UH, SO I, I DO JUST WANT TO NOTE ON YOUR RESPONSE HERE THAT, UM, OUR MEETING ON AUGUST 25TH WILL FALL, UH, ABOUT A WEEK AFTER YOUR, UH, NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING, UM, COMMISSIONER SEEGER, WE'VE ALREADY HIT YOU.

IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE WHO WISHES, WHO HAS A COMMENT OR QUESTION BEFORE WE CIRCLE BACK TO COMMISSIONER SEGER? JUST GO AHEAD.

I WANTED TO SUGGEST AUGUST 25TH.

THAT IS FOLLOWING THE MEETINGS.

YES, IT IS CLOSE A TINY NEIGHBORHOOD.

IS THAT A MOTION COMMISSIONER SEEKER THAT WE POSTPONE THIS HEARING UNTIL AUGUST 25TH.

OKAY.

DO WE HAVE A SECOND SECOND BY COMMISSIONER SHAY? UM, MR. SEEGER, DO YOU WANT TO SPEAK

[00:25:01]

TO YOUR MOTION? WELL, QUITE HONESTLY, I WANT TO GET SOME MORE INFORMATION ON IT BECAUSE I WAS ON, I VOTED FOR THE ORIGINAL 2016.

SO I REALLY WANT TO SEE WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED.

THAT IS DIFFERENT FROM THE EXISTING SITE PLAN, THE BABY SIX MINUTES.

OKAY.

UM, DOES ANYONE ELSE WISH TO SPEAK AGAINST THE MOTION? DOES ANYONE ELSE WISH TO SPEAK FOR THE MOTION? ALL RIGHT.

HEARING NONE.

UM, LET'S GO AHEAD AND GO GREEN IF YOU SUPPORT THE MOTION TO POSTPONE UNTIL AUGUST 25TH.

OKAY.

UM, THAT IS UNANIMOUS.

UM, SO ITEM NUMBER BA AT 17.

YES.

CAN I JUST MAKE A COMMENT TO THE, TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD? UH, SURE.

GO AHEAD.

UM, I THINK THE AUTOMATICALLY, IF YOU HAVE A NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN, THERE'S NOTIFICATION FOR A CHANGE LIKE THIS, THAT GOES OUT TO SEE THE CONTACT TEAM, BUT IF YOU'RE JUST A NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, THAT'S JUST ONLY PART OF THAT NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN.

AND YOU CAN CREATE SORT OF AN INTERESTED PARTY AND, AND REGISTERS AN INTERESTED PARTY OR NOT JUST YOUR ASSOCIATION BOUNDARIES, BUT, BUT AREAS AROUND THAT.

AND SO THEN YOU WILL GET NOTIFIED BY THE CITY FOR CHANGES LIKE THIS.

AND IF YOU'D LIKE HELP DOING THAT, IF YOU NEED TO TALK TO ME OR POSSIBLY CITY STAFF AND WE COULD HELP YOU DO THAT.

YES.

MR. SHARP, YOU MIGHT WANT TO CALL HEATHER CHEFF AND AT THE, UH, AT THE CITY, HER NUMBER, UM, SINCE IT'S POSTED PUBLIC KEY HERE ON THE AGENDA IS (512) 974-2122.

ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU FOLKS.

I'M MOVING ON TO ITEM B 10 AND OTHER DISCUSSION POSTPONEMENT.

UM, THIS CHAIR, WE ALSO SAID BENIGN WAS GOING TO BE A DISCUSSION POSTPONEMENT.

[B9. Rezoning: C14-2019-0108 - Parker House; District 9]

YEP.

THAT'S RIGHT.

YOU'RE RIGHT.

OKAY.

LET'S START WITH BENIGN TWO, FOUR OH FOUR RIO GRANDE STREET.

UM, NO, I THINK WE JUST PULLED OUT THAT'S RIGHT.

IT IS A DISCUSSION FOR POSTPONEMENT.

SO, UM, WE DIDN'T HAVE ANYBODY REQUEST THE POSTPONEMENT.

SO LET'S LOOK CHAIR.

I THINK THAT MAYBE MS. SHAKEN MAY HAVE THE UPDATED BACKUP.

I THINK AT ONE POINT UAP WAS AGAINST THE NOW THERE, OR IS IT THE CHANGES TO THE CASE? I DON'T KNOW.

MS. JASON WANTS TO SPEAK TO THAT.

YES.

HEATHER CHAPMAN PLANNING AND ZONING ON THE PARKER HOUSE REZONING ORIGINALLY STAFF WAS RECOMMENDING, EXCUSE ME, A 15 FOOT SETBACK OF THE HISTORIC HISTORIC LANDMARK ZONING, UH, FROM THE REAR OF THE PARKER HOUSE BUILDING.

THIS WENT TO A HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION AS WAS NOTED.

THEY DID NOT SUPPORT ANY CHANGE IN THE H ZONING, WHICH IS OVER THE WHOLE PROPERTY, INCLUDING A PARKING LOT.

UH, SO NOT JUST THE PARKER HOUSE AREA, BUT AN ADDITIONAL AREA.

THEY NOTED NOT TO SUPPORT ANY CHANGE IN THE ZONING THAT, UH, AGAIN, RECOMMENDED THAT WE FUNCTION WITH THE PARKER HOUSE HAVE THE 15 FOOT SETBACK, BUT AFTER HEARING FROM UNIVERSITY AREA PARTNERS, THEY HAD ORIGINALLY OPPOSED A ZONING CHANGE, BUT THERE WAS NO BACKUP PROVIDED FRIDAY THAT SHOWS THAT THE APPLICANT, THE AGENT SUPPORT EIGHT, 10 FOOT BACK AND STAFF HAS REVIVED THEIR RECOMMENDATION TO MATCH THAT 10 FOOT SECTION.

YES.

HERE.

OH, BREAKUP AND VIDEO ASPIRE.

IS THAT JUST WAIT, I THINK YOU WERE HAVING SOME, UH, INTERNET BANDWIDTH ISSUES THERE, COMMISSION HAVING STANDING AND SIGNING.

I SHOULD ALSO NOTE THAT THE AGENT FOR THIS PROJECT WAS NOT ABLE TO SIGN UP THIS EVENING.

SO IF THERE'S NOT THOUGH FOR CONSENT APPROVAL, THEN IT WILL NEED TO BE POSTPONED.

LET'S GIVE CHEROKEE ANOTHER MINUTE TO GET THAT.

COME ON.

ALRIGHT.

JUST CHANGING LOCATIONS, FOLKS GETTING CLOSER TO MY ROUTER.

UM,

[00:30:02]

PUSH YOUR SEGER.

YES.

I UNDERSTAND.

YEAH.

CAN PACK THE OTHER INTERESTED PARTY IN THIS AREA IS NOT APPROVING ANY CHANGE IN OPPOSITION.

SUPPOSEDLY THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO HAVE BEEN A LETTER FROM FANFAN EXPRESSING THIS POSITION AND I DON'T SEE IT IN OUR BACKUP.

AND IF SO, COULD YOU SHARE IT WITH US PLEASE? CAN I SHARE? I DO NOT BELIEVE I HAVE THAT LETTER, BUT I WOULD HAVE TO GO THROUGH MY EMAILS TO MAKE SURE CHARITY SAY COMMISSIONER SCHNEIDER'S.

YEAH.

I'M CHRISTIAN SHUTTER.

GO AHEAD.

AND, AND WHILE WE'RE LOOKING AT FOR THAT, MR. RIVERA, IF YOU'VE DONE THAT, COULD YOU PULL THAT UP ON OUR SCREEN FOR THE COMMISSIONER SCHNEIDER? UH, I THINK I ASKED YOU BEFORE, BUT I WASN'T SURE THAT WE'VE GOT AN ANSWER.

IS THERE ANY STAFF THAT CAN SPEAK TO THE HISTORIC COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION OR ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT? YES.

COMMISSIONER STEVE, GO AHEAD.

MR. SEDOWSKY HAS MS. JAFFIN SERVED THIS CASE, WENT TO THE HLC IN MAY.

UH, WE WERE CONCERNED.

STAFF WAS CONCERNED ABOUT THE, UH, THE SETBACK, THE SETBACK, UH, WE RECOMMENDED WAS 15 FEET BHOP AS MS. CHAPMAN SAID, UH, RECOMMENDED THAT NO CHANGE IN THE ZONING TAKES PLACE.

AND THE REASON FOR THAT WAS, UH, WOULD THE ZONING, EVEN ON THE PARKING LOT, BE ANY NEW CONSTRUCTION ON THE SITE WAS REQUIRED TO IT UP APPROPRIATELY.

OKAY.

I'M SORRY.

I'M HAVING TROUBLE HEARING.

OKAY.

FOLKS AT THIS POINT WE HAVE, UM, WE'RE GETTING INTO THE MERITS OF THE CASE.

UM, SO WHAT WE HAVE, UH, THE SITUATION SEEMS TO BE IS THAT, UM, THERE'S UNCERTAINTY ABOUT CAMPEX LETTER, A UAP, I THINK HAD OPPOSED, BUT IS NOW SENDING A LETTER SUPPORTING, AND THAT ISN'T OUR BACKUP ONLINE.

NOW I SEE, UM, WE HAD, UH, THE HISTORICAL LANDMARK COMMISSION VOTE AGAINST AND MAY.

UM, THERE'S BEEN SOME, SOME, AND THE PURPORTED AGREEMENT BETWEEN PARTIES, BUT THE INFORMATION IS A LITTLE UNCLEAR ON THAT.

UM, I THINK AT THIS POINT, UNLESS THERE'S OTHER INFORMATION ABOUT THE STATE OF THIS CASE, WE, WE NEED TO MAKE A CALL ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT WE WANT TO HEAR IT TONIGHT OR SNYDER.

I JUST FEEL LIKE, UH, LIKE I MIGHT ACTUALLY BE IN FAVOR OF THIS, BUT THE HISTORIC COMMISSION UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDED AGAINST IT.

SO I FEEL LIKE IT'S ONLY RIGHT TO LET THEM SAY THEIR PIECE AND FOR US TO CONSIDER THAT BEFORE WE MOVE FORWARD.

UH, AND I DON'T KNOW IF WE CAN GET THAT DONE BEFORE IN TIME FOR THE NEXT, UM, IN TIME FOR THE NEXT YEAR.

AND, UH, MR. SNYDER'S THAT EMOTION.

YEAH.

IF WE CAN, THEN I WOULD MOVE THAT, UH, THAT WE POSTPONE THIS TO AUGUST 11TH.

OKAY.

UH, WE HAVE A MOTION THAT THE, I THINK THAT'S COMMISSIONER SECRET, SECONDING THAT MOTION.

UH, DO WE HAVE, UH, ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK AGAINST THE MOTION? WE SHOULD SPEAK A FAVOR.

UM, ALL RIGHT.

UH, THE MOTION ON THE TABLE IS TO POSTPONE UNTIL AUGUST 11TH.

UM, IF YOU'RE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION, GO GREEN AND THAT IS UNANIMOUS.

ALL RIGHT.

SO THAT ITEM WAS POSTPONED UNTIL AUGUST 11TH.

LET ME GRAB MY VOTE.

ALRIGHT.

[B10. Rezoning: C14-2020-0067 - 3504 S. 1st Street Rezoning; District 3]

NEXT POSTPONEMENT ITEM.

I BELIEVE EIGHT, 10 BEATS IN, UH, AT 35 OH FOUR WEST FIRST STREET, WEST BOLDEN CREEK.

UM, WE HAVE TWO NEIGHBORHOODS.

POSTPONING ARE REQUESTING POSTPONEMENT UNTIL SEPTEMBER 8TH WITH THE APPLICANT, OPPOSED.

UM, CAN WE HEAR FROM MS. PETTY SPRINKLE ON THE LINE AND A REMINDER YOU CAN HIT STAR SIX TO UNMUTE OKAY.

30 SPRINKLE

[00:35:01]

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.

UM, UM, WE WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST A POSTPONEMENT UNTIL SEPTEMBER 8TH.

WE'RE REAL FAINT.

IS THERE ANY WAY YOU CAN GET CLOSER TO A PHONE OR COME OFF SPEAKERPHONE? YES.

HANG ON ONE SECOND.

THANK YOU.

SORRY.

I RADIATION AND ALL, WHATEVER.

UM, AND ANYWAY, UM, WE, UM, THEN WE GO INTO A NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, BECAME AWARE OF THIS PROJECT IN LATE JUNE.

WE'VE MET WITH THE DEVELOPER.

WE HAD OUR FIRST ZOOM MEETING WITH OUR NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION LAST NIGHT, OUR PROCESSES, THUS THAT WE BRING IT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

AND THEN WE, UM, AT OUR NEXT MEETING, WHICH IS SCHEDULED AT THE END OF SEPTEMBER, WE WOULD TAKE A VOTE ON THE PROJECT.

NOW WE UNDERSTAND ORIGINALLY WE HAD REQUESTED A POSTPONEMENT UNTIL OCTOBER.

WE UNDERSTAND THAT THERE'S A 60 DAY LIMIT.

WE TOTALLY CAN APPRECIATE THAT.

UM, BUT, UM, WE ARE, AND WE ALSO WILLING AT THIS POINT IN TIME TO HOLD A SPECIAL CALL MEETING AT THE END OF AUGUST.

AND SO THAT WE CAN ADDRESS THIS ISSUE.

BUT IN ORDER TO DO THAT, WE HAVE TO PRINT UP SOME SIGNS.

WE STILL HAVE QUITE A FEW PEOPLE IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, UM, AND IN OUR DISTRICT, WHICH WE'RE PART OF DISTRICT THREE THAT DO NOT HAVE A LOT OF INTERNET ACCESS.

SO WE HAVE TO REALLY DO OUR DUE DILIGENCE TO MAKE SURE THAT EVERYBODY IS AWARE AND UNDERSTANDS THIS PROJECT.

SO, UM, WE, WE JUST RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT WE COULD HAVE UNTIL SEPTEMBER 8TH THAT GIVES US EVERYBODY TIME TO GET ALL THEIR QUESTIONS ANSWERED.

WE KNOW THAT, UM, THIS MERCK LIST PROJECT, UM, IS NOT DUE TO CLOSE PROBABLY UNTIL OCTOBER OF 2021.

SO WE FEEL LIKE HAVING A MONTHS TIME TO REALLY FULLY INVESTIGATE THIS IS SHOULDN'T BE A PROBLEM.

AND WE WOULD HOPE THAT THAT, THAT IT'S, UH, AN OKAY REQUEST TO MAKE AT THIS POINT IN TIME.

THANK YOU.

UH, IS MR. SUTTLE ON THE LINE? YES.

CAN YOU HEAR ME? WE CAN GO AHEAD.

YEAH.

MY NAME IS RICHARD SUTTLE.

I'M HERE ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT.

THIS WAS A CASE THAT HAS BEEN FILED TO ALLOW FOR MORE HOUSING DOWN IN THIS AREA.

IT WAS FILED AROUND JULY.

I MEAN, JUNE IMMEDIATELY IT'S CALLED THE NEIGHBORHOOD GROUP, UH, BEFORE IT WAS ACTUALLY THE DAY WE FILED IT.

WE'VE HAD A MEETING WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD GROUP.

UM, WE JUST THINK THAT SEPTEMBER IS, IS TOO FAR.

WE'RE TRYING TO PLAN THIS PROJECT WITH A PROPERTY ADJACENT TO IT.

WE, WE WERE HOPING WE COULD AGREE TO AN AUGUST 11TH MEETING AND WE'LL WHATEVER, NOTICE IT NEEDS TO GO OUT TO THE NEIGHBORS.

WE'LL, WE'LL HELP FUND THAT IF, IF THAT'S A PROBLEM, BUT SO FAR, WE HAVEN'T HAD A PROBLEM GETTING NEIGHBORHOODS TO PARTICIPATE IN A MEETING.

IN ADDITION TO THAT, WE'LL HAVE ADDITIONAL TIME TO IRON OUT THE DETAILS BEFORE COUNCIL, BUT FOR, UH, WE PUT OFF FOR A MONTH AND A HALF OR TWO MONTHS ON A, ON A CASE WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE MAP, IT'S JUST, IT'S JUST NOT THAT COMPLICATED.

AND WE'D ASK THAT YOU TEE US UP FOR TWO WEEKS FROM NOW AND WE'LL DO WHATEVER IT TAKES.

OKAY.

UM, IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE ON THE LINE, UH, EITHER BRUCE OR JULES CAIN WHO WISHES TO ADD MORE TO THIS DISCUSSION ABOUT A WINDOW POSTPONE ITSELF? HI ANDREW.

THIS IS BRUCE BRUCE NIGH WITH.

UM, IF I MAY GO AHEAD, UM, COMMISSIONERS, MY NAME IS BRUCE NIGH.

I APPRECIATE OPPORTUNITY TO BE WITH YOU TONIGHT.

UH, I AM ON A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND A RESIDENT OF THE CARDINAL LANE, UH, CONDOMINIUM COMMUNITY.

MR. NOW YOU'RE BREAKING UP A LITTLE BIT.

IF YOU'RE ON SPEAKER PHONE, CAN YOU COME OFF OR GET CLOSER TO YOUR PHONE? HOW'S THAT THAT'S MUCH BETTER.

YEAH.

OKAY.

I'M A MEMBER OF THE CARDINAL LANE, CONDOMINIUM COMMUNITY, INC.

I'M ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

WE SIT AT SEVEN OH SEVEN CARDINAL LANE, WHICH IS DIRECTLY NORTHWEST OF THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION.

AND WE SIT DUE WEST AND DOWNHILL OF MERCURY HALL.

UH, WE'RE REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE OF THIS PROCEEDING, UH, UNTIL SEPTEMBER 8TH.

IT IS OUR FIRST REQUEST FOR A CONTINUANCE.

WE OBTAINED NOTICE VIA MAIL IN, I GUESS, MID JULY OF THIS PROJECT.

UNLIKE THE REPRESENTATIONS THAT MR. SUTTLE HAS MADE, WE HAVE HAD NO MEETINGS WITH THE OWNERS OR THE APPLICANT CONCERNING THIS PROJECT.

UH, WE'VE NOT SEEN, WE'RE NOT, UH, WE'VE NOT SEEN ANY PLANS WITH REGARD TO THE PROPERTY.

I ASSUME HE'S TALKING ABOUT THE MERCURY WHOLE PROPERTY.

UH, WE DON'T KNOW WHAT THEY HAVE IN, UH, FULLY HAVE IN MIND FOR THAT PROPERTY.

UH, AND SO WE HAVE 30, UH, HOMEOWNERS HERE.

I DID NOTICE, AND I WOULD NOTE THAT WE ARE NOT LISTED,

[00:40:01]

UH, AS A COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION ON YOUR BACKUP INFORMATION, ON THE ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET.

UH, IT WAS A NEIGHBORHOOD THERE.

UH, WE WOULD LIKE AT LEAST A 30 DAY, 30 DAY CONTINUANCE TO, UH, HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO INFORM OUR NEIGHBORS, TO POSSIBLY MEET WITH, UH, THE APPLICANT AND THE OWNERS, UH, TO MORE FULLY UNDERSTAND THIS PROJECT BECAUSE WHATEVER IT GOES ON AND WHATEVER THEY'RE CONTEMPLATING WITH REGARD TO THAT PROPERTY HAS A MAJOR IMPACT ON US AS WE SIT DOWN HILL FROM IT.

SO WE HAVE WE'LL HAVE TRAFFIC CONCERNS, WATER RUNOFF.

KAY.

I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME.

ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU, MR. NYE.

UM, SO THE REQUEST THAT WE HAVE ON, UH, ON THE TABLE HERE TO SEPTEMBER 8TH, ABOUT SIX WEEKS, UM, ARE THERE COMMISSIONERS WHO HAVE QUESTIONS OR WISH TO SPEAK? UH, AND, AND IF EVERYONE WHO JUST SPOKE CAN STAY ON THE LINE, TURN DOWN YOUR TVS AND STAY OFF SPEAKERPHONE.

UH, I THINK THAT'LL HELP EVERYBODY AND MAKE SURE THAT WE CAN HEAR EVERYTHING.

UM, I'LL GO AHEAD AND, AND ASK THE QUESTION.

UH, MR. NYE, UM, YOU MENTIONED A ONE MONTH POSTPONE THEN AS NUMBER EIGHT WILL BE SIX WEEKS, UH, ABOUT A MONTH WOULD BE AUGUST 25TH.

UM, THAT IS, IS HALFWAY BETWEEN YOU AND, AND WHAT THE APPLICANT IS, IS DESIRING AND WOULD BE ABOUT A MONTH.

UM, HOW DOES, HOW DOES, IS THAT, WOULD THAT BE ENOUGH TIME TO REST YOUR NUMBERS? WELL, I, I APPRECIATE IT.

I APPRECIATE THAT OFFER.

UM, THAT DAY WE'D DISCUSSED THAT DATE, UH, BECAUSE THE APPLICANT HAD ORIGINALLY SUGGESTED IT AUGUST 11TH.

UH, SOME OF OUR, YOU KNOW, IT'S A BIG NUMBER, A NUMBER OF OWNERS ARE NOT PRESENT HERE RIGHT NOW.

AND SO WE'RE LIKE IN THE TOTALITY, THE PANDEMIC, WE WOULD HAVE TO TRY TO MAKE THAT HAPPEN.

UH, WE JUST FELT THAT A MINIMUM OF 30 DAYS IS WHAT WE NEEDED.

AND SO THE NEXT MEETING DATE AFTER THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN SEPTEMBER 8TH.

OKAY.

UM, A TINY SPRINKLE.

DO YOU WANT TO, UH, COULD YOU SPEAK AT ALL TO THAT? UM, SIX WEEKS IS A LITTLE UNUSUAL, UH, FOR A DELAY.

UM, UH, 25TH WOULD BE A LITTLE BIT MORE IN PRACTICE.

UM, WHAT ABOUT 30 DAYS BE ENOUGH FOR YOU? UM, I AGREE WITH BRUCE THAT WE, WE NEED THE TIME.

I CAN APPRECIATE MR. SUTTLES POSITION, BUT THIS IS UNUSUAL TIMES THAT WE'RE LIVING IN.

AND AS I EXPLAINED EARLIER, WE DO HAVE CONSTRAINTS AND WE CAN SEND OUT, UM, A NOTICE TO EVERYBODY AND HOPEFULLY THEY CAN GET ONLINE AND VOTE BECAUSE WE'RE DOING EVERYTHING REMOTELY.

IT JUST REQUIRES A LOT MORE EFFORT ON OUR PART.

AND AS SOMEBODY IN ONE OF THE LAST CASES SAID, YOU KNOW, THIS IS NOT OUR DAY JOB.

WE ARE HERE JUST DOING OUR BEST FOR VOLUNTEERS.

AND, UM, THIS PROJECT, YOU KNOW, IT IS IMPORTANT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT CONDITIONAL OVERLAY WAS PUT IN PLACE IN 2007.

AND IT, IT IT'S THERE FOR A REASON.

AND MAYBE MANY OF YOU DON'T KNOW, THE GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION IS VERY HIGH ON THE HILL.

UM, THE HEIGHT RESTRICTION WAS PUT IN PLACE.

THERE'S 2000 VEHICLE TRIPS PER DAY ALREADY, WHICH YOU KNOW, TO MY MIND, THAT'S NEVER THANK YOU TO SPRINKLE IT.

YEAH, I THINK I GREW UP, YES.

I KNOW.

DO YOU HAVE, UH, THE NEIGHBORHOOD GROUPS, SO YOU NEED TO DEAL WITH HERE ASKING FOR SIX WEEKS, PLEASE.

IS THAT SOMETHING THAT YOU CAN DEAL WITH? SORRY, WHEN I PUSHED THE NO MUTE BUTTON, IT CUTS YOU OFF.

SAY THAT AGAIN, PLEASE.

UH, THE TWO NEIGHBORHOOD GROUPS HERE WHO ARE, UH, WHO YOU NEED TO DEAL WITH ON THIS CASE OR ASKING FOR THE SIX WEEK DELAY AND SAYING THAT THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE DIFFICULTIES GETTING IT DONE WITHIN THE MONTH.

UM, WHAT IS YOUR, UH, WHAT IS YOUR TAKE ON, ON THE 25TH VERSUS SEPTEMBER 8TH, CONSIDERING THAT A, IT MIGHT MAKE THE NEIGHBOR GROUPS, UM, LITTLE, HOPEFULLY MORE POSITIVELY INCLINED TOWARDS THIS CASE WHEN YOU PUT IT THAT WAY.

IT'S HARD.

I MEAN, I WAS HOPING TO REACH AN AGREEMENT FOR THE 11TH.

I COULD AGREE IT WAS 25TH, GIVEN THAT WE HAD NOT CONTACTED YET, UH, THE, THE GROUP NEXT TO US, ONCE YOU START PUSHING IT MORE THAN A MONTH OFF, THEN IT PUSHES YOUR DATE OFF.

AND IT THERE'S JUST A CASCADING EFFECT.

AND, UM, I HATE TO AGREE TO THE 25TH BECAUSE, BECAUSE OF THE WAY THIS IS GOING, I'D RATHER KEEP THE 11TH, BUT I THINK WE COULD ALL GET PREPARED IF WE ALL GOT TOGETHER.

I THINK THERE'S PROBABLY, IT'S GOING TO BE A PHONE CALL ANYWAY, THE 25TH WOULD BE REASONABLE AND WE COULD, WE COULD AGREE TO THAT.

ALL RIGHT.

UH, COMMISSIONER SEEGER, GO AHEAD.

YOU'RE MUTED

[00:45:04]

MOTION TO POSTPONE TO AUGUST 25TH, SECOND.

AND THE SECOND QUESTION ARE ANDERSON.

CHRIS, YOUR SECRET DO WAS JUST SPEAK TO YOUR MOTION.

OKAY.

NO, I'M LISTENING TO THREE GROUPS OF PEOPLE SAYING THEY REALLY NEED MORE.

UM, ESPECIALLY THE CONDO ROUTE, NOT BEEN INVOLVED AT ALL.

I UNDERSTAND THAT EVERYTHING'S DONE BY TELEPHONE.

HOWEVER, AS VOLUNTEERS, AS WE ALL KNOW UP HERE, THAT VOLUNTEERS HAVE TO SCHEDULE THINGS.

SO, UH, LET'S GIVE THEM THE FOUR WAITS AND COME BACK READY TO DISCUSS.

OKAY.

IS THERE ANYONE WHO SHOULD SPEAK AGAINST THE MOTION? ANYONE ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR CASA, GO AHEAD, CHERYL AND SPEAK IN FAVOR, BUT ALSO REALLY JUST, UM, UM, ADVISE THE TWO GROUPS THAT I HEARD MR. SUTTLE AGREE TO HELP, UM, THE NOTIFICATION.

SO I UNDERSTAND THAT THEY'RE VOLUNTEERS AND, AND IF THEY CAN USE SOME HELP TO NOTIFY, NOTIFY THEIR MEMBERSHIP, UM, I BELIEVE MR. SETTLE OFFERED THAT.

OKAY.

ANYONE ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS MOTION? HEARING NONE.

LET'S TAKE A VOTE ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION TO POSTPONE THE CASE UNTIL AUGUST 25TH GO GREEN.

THAT IS UNANIMOUS.

ALL RIGHT, SURE.

SIGN THAT.

THAT'S A SICKLY LOOKING APPLE.

UH, SO, UM, YEAH, SO FOLKS, EVERYONE WHO'S ON THE LINE.

SO THE POST, THE CASE HAS BEEN POSTPONED TILL AUGUST 25TH.

YOU'VE HEARD COMMISSIONER CAUSEY, UH, SUGGEST THAT, UH, MR. SUTTLE MIGHT BE MOTIVATED TO, TO HELP FACILITATE A MEETING.

SO, UM, UH, HOPEFULLY YOU ALL HAVE EACH OTHER'S CONTACT INFORMATION.

IF NOT, UM, YOU CAN GET IN TOUCH WITH, UH, MR. RIVERA HERE IN THE OFFICE, UM, OR, UH, KATE CLARK AND THE PLANNING ZONING DEPARTMENT.

UM, THEIR CONTACT INFORMATION IS ON THE AGENDA FOR TODAY'S MEETING AND HOPEFULLY THAT'LL WORK ITSELF OUT.

ALRIGHT.

POSTPONE AUGUST 25.

ALL RIGHT.

UM,

[B1. Rezoning: C14-2020-0030 - 200 Montopolis Rezoning; District 3]

LET'S GO AHEAD AND GET INTO OUR DISCUSSION AGENDA.

UM, SO WE HAVE THESE MONTOPOLIS CASES FIRST.

I KNOW THAT NOT EVERYONE, UH, EVERYONE WHO'S ON THE LINE.

I KNOW NOT EVERYONE IS WISHES TO SPEAK ON, UH, ALL THREE CASES AT ONCE, BUT, UM, FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT HAVE, UH, UH, YOUR CONCERNS ARE COMMON TO ALL THREE CASES AND YOU THINK IT MIGHT HELP YOU TO, UM, TO GET AN ADDITIONAL THREE MINUTES OF TIME, UH, TO WORK THROUGH YOUR THOUGHTS MORE COMPLETELY AT THE BEGINNING.

UH, THAT'S AN OPTION THAT WE WANT TO OFFER YOU.

UM, SO THE WAY THAT WE'RE GOING TO DO THIS IS WE'RE GOING TO TAKE IT THE FIRST ONE WE'RE GOING TO HEAR FROM STAFF, AND WE'RE GOING TO HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT TO GIVE THEIR OPENING REMARKS FOR CASE NUMBER ONE.

UM, AND, UH, AND THEN THAT IS THE ONLY, YEAH, AND THEN WE WILL GET INTO THE, UM, THE FOLKS WHO WERE OPPOSED TO THIS, AND YOU CAN EITHER CHOOSE TO SPEAK ON THAT ONE CASE, OR YOU CAN CHOOSE TO SPEAK ON ALL THREE.

UM, AND JUST TO REMIND HER ALL THREE OF THESE CASES ARE REZONING FROM SF THREE TO SF SIX.

UM, SO IT'S, IT'S A SINGLE FAMILY ZONING, UH, THERE'S NO NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN AMENDMENT REQUIRED BECAUSE, UM, IT'S ALLOWED UNDER THE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN.

SO, UM, WITH THAT, UH, IF EVERYONE CAN, UM, TURN DOWN YOUR TVS, THERE IS A DELAY, UH, SPEAKERPHONE IS GENERALLY A BAD IDEA, UM, AND, UH, HIT STAR SIX TO UNMUTE YOURSELF.

I WILL, I WILL CALL ON EVERYONE, UH, AND, AND GIVE YOU SOME HEADS UP WHEN YOU'RE COMING UP SOON.

SO WITH THAT, UM, WE HAVE KATE CLARK ON THE LINE TO INTRODUCE ITEM NUMBER B ONE, WHICH IS 200 MONTOPOLIS DRIVE AND 62 OH EIGHT QUILLA STREET.

GOOD EVENING.

CAN YOU HEAR ME? UH, WE CAN YOU'RE YOU'RE A LITTLE FUZZY.

OKAY.

UM, I WILL TRY AND SPEAK AS CLOSE TO MY SPEAKER AS POSSIBLE.

UM, THIS IS, THIS IS A CASE C 14 DASH 2020 DASH ZERO ZERO 3,200 MONTOPOLIS REZONING.

THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 200 MONTOPOLIS DRIVE AND 62 OH EIGHT CLOVIS STREET.

AND IT IS APPROXIMATELY 1.3, TWO ACRES IN SIZE.

IT IS LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF MONTOPOLIS JIVE, AND THE NORTH SIDE OF CLOVIS STREETS.

IT HAS PROPERTIES TO THE WEST AND SOUTH OF IT TO THE NORTH ARE ATTRACT ZONES, P N P AND C CS TO THE EAST ACROSS.

AND THE TOPLESS DRIVE IS THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE U S HIGHWAY ONE 83.

AND IT IS NOT STONED.

STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST TO READ THE NP.

THIS PROPERTY IS ON THE PERIPHERY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE NORTH OF THE PROPERTY IS THE PUBLIC PARK AND APPROXIMATELY ZONE CS TO THE EAST ACROSS THE NEW TOPLESS DRIVE IS THE U S ONE 83 HIGHWAY.

AND MOST OF THE PROPERTIES THAT THEY

[00:50:01]

SEND TO THE HIGHWAY ARE YOU ZONED ON THE COMMERCIAL BASED DISTRICT SENDING THIS PROPERTY TO SFX, AND HE WOULD PROVIDE A TRANSITION IN YOUTH INSIGHTS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS BETWEEN THE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY TO THE NORTH AND THE RESIDENTIAL USES TO THE SOUTH.

THERE HAS BEEN A VALID PETITION FILED FOR THIS CASE.

THE CURRENT PERCENTAGE FOR THE PETITION IS 27.23, AND IT WAS INCLUDED IN YOUR BACKUP.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

ALRIGHT, THANK YOU, MS. CLARK, UM, UH, MR. THROW, DO WE HAVE YOU ON THE LINE OR IS VICTORIA HASI DOING IT? I THINK IT'S, I THINK IT'S, UM, WHO'S, WHO'S GOING FIRST.

WHO'S DOING THE MAIN PRESENTATION.

WE CAN'T HEAR YOU.

IF YOU'RE TALKING NOW IT'S STAR SIX TO UNMUTE.

CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW? I CAN, YES.

GO AHEAD.

YOU HAVE SIX MINUTES.

OH, BABY POSSE WITH HER WOULD BE FINE.

THE SAUSAGE, WE ARE NOT READING YOU VERY CLEARLY.

IF, IF YOU'RE ON SPEAKER, IF IT'S POSSIBLE FOR YOU TO SWITCH OFF SPEAKER.

YEP.

GIMME JUST ONE SECOND.

AND JUST A REMINDER THAT THERE IS A DELAY ON THE TV, SO YOU CAN EITHER CALL OUT THE SLIDE NUMBER AND TRUST THAT WE'RE THERE.

OR IF YOU'D LIKE, I CAN GIVE YOU A VERBAL PROMPT WHEN WE'VE REACHED YOUR SLIDE.

OKAY.

CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW? I CAN HEAR YOU.

OKAY.

UM, OKAY.

GOOD EVENING.

COMMISSIONERS TO HASI WITH MAJORITY DESIGN ON BEHALF OF THE PROPERTY OWNER.

UM, YOU CAN GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE.

MIKE, DID YOU HAVE THE PRESENTATION UP ALREADY? YES, IT IS.

AND WE'RE ON THE NEXT SLIDE.

GO AHEAD.

AND I'M JUST GOING TO SAY OKAY.

WHEN WE FIT THE NEXT SLIDE.

ALL RIGHT.

PERFECT.

PERFECT.

THIS IS AN AERIAL IMAGE OF THE SITE.

THE PROPERTY IS 1.3 ACRES OF LAND THAT HAS REMAINED MOSTLY UNDEVELOPED FOR SOME TIME.

I'M HEARING NOISE IN THE BACKGROUND.

SORRY.

MORE, MORE IMPORTANTLY, NEW DEVELOPMENT WILL NOT DISPLACE ANYONE FROM THIS PROPERTY RATHER THAN PROPERTY IS PERFECTLY SITUATED TO RECEIVE NEW HOMES FOR FAMILIES OF ALL KINDS.

NEXT SLIDE.

OKAY.

THIS MAP PROVIDES CONTEXT FOR PROXIMITY TO IMAGINE AUSTIN CORRIDORS AND CENTERS.

THERE IS AN IMAGINED AUSTIN TOWN CENTER ABOUT A MILE AND A HALF SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT TRACK.

IT IS CENTERED AROUND EAST RIVERSIDE DRIVE.

UM, THERE ARE ALSO, UM, SOME TRANSIT STOPS IN THE VICINITY OF THE SUBJECT TRACKS AS WELL.

NEXT SLIDE.

UM, THE SUBJECT TRACT IS WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF THE MONTOPOLIS RIVER TERRACE WATERFRONT OVERLAY.

THE WATERFRONT OVERLAY PROVIDES ADDITIONAL AN ADDITIONAL LAYER OF REGULATIONS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT OF ANY TYPE, UM, WITHIN THAT, WITHIN THOSE BOUNDS.

NEXT SLIDE.

OKAY.

THE REQUEST IS FOR A SPECIFIC ZONING, WHICH KEEPS THE PROPERTY IN THE SINGLE FAMILY GROUP OF ZONING DISTRICTS.

THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ARE FEW AND YET SIGNIFICANT TO ACHIEVING A BUILDING LAYOUT THAT IS MORE RESPONSIBLE TO EXISTING CONDITIONS.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

OKAY.

THE REQUEST IN ALIGNMENT WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN AS THE SINGLE FAMILY TEACHER LAND USE CATEGORY ALLOWED FOR ALL SINGLE FAMILY ZONING DISTRICTS FROM SF ONES, OR SSX NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.

OKAY.

THIS EXCERPT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD, UH, THE MONTOPOLIS NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN RECOMMENDS RESIDENTS OR USES ON REMAINING UNDEVELOPED LAND THAT DOES NOT FRONT RIVERSIDE DRIVE OR HIGHWAY ONE 83, UH, FURTHER THE PLAN REFERS TO THE SOC ZONING DISTRICT AS AN APPROPRIATE ZONING DISTRICT OPTION TO ACHIEVE SMART GROWTH UNTIL DEVELOPMENT.

NOW, THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THIS PROPERTY GUIDES DEVELOPMENT OF SINGLE FAMILY TYPES OF WHICH THE ASSET SIX ZONING DISTRICT IS INCLUDED IN WHAT IS PERMISSIBLE FOR THIS PROPERTY? NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

OKAY.

THE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN DOCUMENT REVEALS THE NEIGHBORHOOD'S DESIRE FOR A VARIETY OF HOUSING TYPES AND INTENSITIES, UM, AND ENCOURAGES SUCH TYPES OF LAND THAT HAS, UH, ENCOURAGES THOSE ON LAND ANYWHERE FROM SF ONE THROUGH MSX.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

OKAY.

THE PROPERTY IS PARKED AWAY AT THE VERY NORTH END OF MONTOPOLIS DRIVE EVEN.

SO THE PROPERTY IS LESS THAN A QUARTER MILE FROM THE PORTION OF MONTOPOLIS DRIVE.

THAT IS PART OF THE TRANSIT PRIORITY NETWORK, AND CURRENTLY HAS TRANSIT ACCESS.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

OKAY.

FURTHER THE PROPERTY BACKS UP TO THE HIGH, UH, TO HIGHWAY ONE 83 WITH, UH, 16 LANES OF CARS PASSING AT ANY GIVEN MOMENT THAT PLANNING PRINCIPLES GUIDE PROPERTIES SUCH AS THIS AWAY FROM RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.

YET IT IS HARDLY A PLACE WHERE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT WOULD BE WELCOMED BY

[00:55:01]

THE NEIGHBORHOOD, NOR DOES IT HAVE APPROPRIATE ACCESS FOR COMMERCIAL USES.

INSTEAD OF BSS SIX ZONING DISTRICTS AT THIS LOCATION WILL PROVIDE A GRADATION OF SINGLE FAMILY DENSITY TOWARDS THE HIGHWAY, WHICH WILL ESSENTIALLY CREATE A BUFFER FOR THOSE SF THREE PROPERTIES IN ON THE INTERIOR.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

OKAY.

THE SIDE BY SIDE COMPARISON OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICTS SHOW HOW SIMILAR THE TWO DISTRICTS ARE.

UH, I ALSO HAVE A THIRD COLUMN ON THE RIGHT HAND SIDE OF THE TABLE THAT ACTUALLY TALKS ABOUT THIS SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT ON THIS, ON THESE SPECIFIC TRACKS.

UM, THEY ALLOW NEARLY THE SAME DENSITY WHEN CONSIDERING DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE.

IN FACT, S THREE IS MORE DENSE THAN SSX CONSIDERING THAT EVERY SF THREE LOT FROM IT, THE HOUSE IN AN ADU, BOTH ZONING DISTRICTS ALLOW THE SAME BUILDING HEIGHT, WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH ALL SURROUNDING SFE PROPERTY.

AND THE PRIMARY DIFFERENCE IS THAT A STEP SIX ALLOWS CLUSTERING A STRUCTURE TO WORK AROUND KEY LAND FEATURES.

ANOTHER KEY DIFFERENCE IS THAT SOC REQUIRES A 25 FOOT BUILDING SETBACKS FROM ALL THE PROPERTIES THAT ARE ZONED LESS THAN SSX.

SO IN CONTRAST, DEVELOPMENT WILL ALLOW NEW CONSTRUCTION MUCH CLOSER AT JUST FIVE FEET, EXISTING PROPERTIES AND HOMES IN THE END.

SO SIX OFFERS A SINGLE FAMILY PRODUCT THAT IS MORE ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY, MORE COST EFFICIENT, AND APPEALS TO THOSE WHO DO NOT WISH TO MAINTAIN A LARGE YARD AND WITH LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

OKAY.

SO THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT AN SFP SUBDIVISION COULD LOOK LIKE AT THIS LOCATION.

THERE COULD BE SEVEN SINGLE FAMILY, LOTS WITH EACH PLOT, HAVING THE ABILITY TO CONSTRUCT AN ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT FOR A TOTAL OF 14 DWELLING UNITS.

EACH DWELLING UNIT WOULD REQUIRE A FIVE FOOT SETBACK FROM THE ADJACENT PROPERTY.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

AND THIS IS THE SAME WAY OUT SHOWING EXISTING DEVELOPMENT FOR CONTACTS.

NOTICE THE PROPERTIES IMMEDIATELY TO THE SOUTH OF 201 TOPLESS.

THOSE ARE A RECENT 2017 DEVELOPMENT WHERE A SINGLE LARGE LOT WITH SOME DIVIDED INTO THREE LOTS WITH EACH LOT, HAVING TWO UNITS FOR A TOTAL OF SIX UNITS, NEWLY CONSTRUCTED UNDER EXISTING SF THREE ZONING ENTITLEMENTS.

UM, THE TWO SUBJECT CHECKS WOULD, WOULD HAVE THE SAME OUTCOME.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

OKAY.

THAT WAS FOR COMPARISON.

THIS IS A POSSIBLE LAYOUT FOR WHAT AN DEVELOPMENT WOULD LOOK LIKE.

IF THIS LOCATION SITE AREA REQUIREMENTS ARE SUCH THAT NO MORE THAN 16 UNITS CAN BE ACHIEVED ACROSS THE LAND AREA OF BOTH LOTS.

THE DIFFERENCE IN THE POSSIBILITY FOR THESE PROPERTIES IS TWO UNITS, 14 DWELLING UNITS VERSUS 16 DWELLING UNITS.

FOR DIFFERENCES.

THIS DEVELOPMENT CAN BE MORE SUSTAINABLE, MORE ENVIRONMENTALLY RESPONSIBLE AND CAN PROVIDE SMALLER UNITS THAT WILL COST LESS THAN AN SF THREE DWELLING UNIT WOULD COST.

I ASKED YOU TO CONSIDER IF THE BENEFITS OF AN SIX DEVELOPMENT OUTWEIGH WHAT IS PERCEIVED TO BE A BURDEN.

UM, IT IS A BURDEN ON OUR ENVIRONMENT, OUR RURAL LANDS IN OUR CITY INFRASTRUCTURE TO PUSH, UM, DEVELOPMENT TO THE OUTSKIRTS OF AUSTIN AND PUT PEOPLE FURTHER AWAY FROM SERVICES AND OPPORTUNITY.

AND WE'RE HERE TO ASK FOR AN ADDITION OF TWO MORE UNITS ON THIS, ON THESE TWO TRACKS.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

OKAY.

SO TONIGHT WE'RE ASKING YOU TO LOOK CLOSELY AT JUST HOW SIMILAR ZONING DISTRICTS ARE.

OUR REQUEST IS MORE OR LESS LABEL VERSUS A DRASTICALLY DIFFERENT ZONING DISTRICT.

IN WHICH MANY NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTS HAVE BEEN TOLD TO SEE HER INFORMATION I'VE BEEN CIRCULATING IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT THE SFX DISTRICT IS AKIN TO A HURRICANE OF DENSITY THAT WILL CLASS WITH EXISTING AND OVER WELL, THE NEIGHBORHOOD WITH TOO MANY PEOPLE AND TOO MANY CARS.

IN REALITY, THE SFX ZONING DISTRICT IS A SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT THAT IS COMPATIBLE WITH EVICTION DEVELOPMENT AND IS THEREFORE ABSOLUTELY APPROPRIATE FOR PROPERTIES LIKE THIS IN THE CORE SINGLE-FAMILY AREAS WHERE VACANT LAND PROVIDES AN OPPORTUNITY FOR BETTER RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.

AND WE RESPECTFULLY ASK YOUR SUPPORT TO BUILD TWO ADDITIONAL HOMES ON THIS SITE.

AND WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

THANK YOU.

ALRIGHT.

UM, IN, UH, UM, MR. THROWER DO WISH TO SPEAK IN FAVOR.

COMMISSIONER'S GOING TO HEAR ME, YOU'RE CUTTING OUT A LITTLE BIT, MR. STORER, UM, COMMISSIONERS THAT YOU CAN HEAR ME.

UH, YES.

I WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS CASE AS VICTORIA HAD POINTED OUT, UH, THE DIFFERENCE IN SF THREE AND SSX DEVELOPMENT FOR THIS PROPERTY IS EITHER 14 UNITS OR 16 UNITS.

AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY IS CLOSER TO ONE 83 THAN IT IS TO MONTOPOLIS DRIVE.

AND I WOULD LIKE TO JUST REITERATE THAT THE PROPOSAL COMPLIES WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD

[01:00:01]

PLAN, VICTORIA POINTED OUT A LOT OF THE POINTS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN THAT ARE VERY RELEVANT TO THE SITUATION.

AND SO WITH SSX DEVELOPMENT, YOU GET GREATER SETBACKS, YOU GET A COHESIVE DEVELOPMENT, YOU GET ONE DRIVEWAY INSTEAD OF MULTIPLE DRIVEWAYS.

YOU IT'S LESS IMPACT ON TAXPAYERS.

IT'S GREATER DRAINAGE DRAINAGE FEE REVENUE TO THE CITY OF AUSTIN.

IT'S PRIVATE MAINTENANCE FOR PONDS, IT'S PRIVATE MAINTENANCE FOR THE INTERNAL DRIVE.

IT'S PRIVATE MAINTENANCE FOR THE COMMON GROUNDS.

IT IS MUCH GREATER TREE PROTECTION AND FLEXIBILITY.

AND THE DESIGNED TO WORK AROUND THE TREES AND OTHER SITE CONSTRAINTS THAT ARE ON THE PROPERTY.

IT IS LIKELY LESS OVERALL IMPERVIOUS COVER.

AND, YOU KNOW, THERE'S A HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, THERE'S GREATER SOCIAL INTERACTION OPPORTUNITIES AND THESE, THESE CONDITIONS.

AND I JUST STRONGLY ENCOURAGE Y'ALL TO LOOK AT SSX AS AN ALTERNATIVE ASSET THREE, FOR THESE MANY REASONS, AS WELL AS SSX IS ESSENTIALLY A DOWN ZONING AND THE DENSITY ALLOWED ON ANY PIECE OF PROPERTY.

SF THREE ALLOWS FOR TWO UNITS ON 5,750 SQUARE FEET.

AND YOU'VE GOT TO HAVE 7,000 SQUARE FEET UNDER SS SIX TO BE ABLE TO GET TWO UNITS.

UM, SO WITH THAT, WE'RE CERTAINLY AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS AND WE WOULD APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY FOR A REBUTTAL IN THE END.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

OKAY, SO NOW WE'RE GOING TO GO OVER TO THOSE WHO WERE OPPOSED AND, UH, JUST AS A REMINDER, UM, WE, UH, WE CAN OFFER YOU DOUBLE TIME IF YOU WERE INTERESTED IN, UH, SPEAKING TO ALL THREE ITEMS NOW, OR YOU'RE FREE TO TAKE YOUR, YOUR NORMAL TIME, UH, ACROSS ALL THREE ITEMS. IT'S UP TO YOU.

UM, UH, EVERYBODY SHOULD REMEMBER TO TURN DOWN YOUR TV CAUSE THERE WAS A DELAY AND, UM, SPEAKERPHONE IS, IS USUALLY NOT A GOOD IDEA.

SO, UM, AND THEN STAR SIX, UNMUTES YOU SO FIRST UP I HAVE SUSANA ALMANZA.

UM, AND THEN, UH, SO YOU COULD HAVE, UH, SIX MINUTES OR IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK ON ALL THE ITEMS, YOU CAN TAKE 12 NOW.

UH, AND THEN AFTER THAT I HAVE PETER SIMON I AND DANIEL HARP, UH, WHO IS ONLY SPEAKING ON ONE.

I HAVE.

SO AS A MONZA, DO WE HAVE YOU ON THE LINE? YES, I'M ON THE LINE.

I CAN.

AND WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK JUST ON THIS CASE OR ON ALL THREE CASES? UH, I'LL GO AHEAD AND SPEAK ON, ON THREE CASES.

OKAY, GO AHEAD.

AND I'M THE I'M ON TOP OF NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN, CONTACT TEAM, AND WE HAVE A VALID POINT AGAINST ALL THREE PROPERTIES.

AND MY TOP IS NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN.

CONTACT TEAM MET MAY 26, 2020 AT THE SOUTHEAST HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER.

NO REPRESENTATIVES FROM RON THROUGH OR HAVE THE AUTHORITY DESIGN GROUP APPEARED AT THE MEETING WHO THE REPRESENTATIVES FROM ALL THE, WHO ARE THE REPRESENTATIVE FROM ALL THE ABOVE, THEY REFUSED TO ATTEND A CONTACT MEETING BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT COMFORTABLE COMING TO MONTOPOLIS COMMUNITY.

THE MEETING WAS BEING HELD AT ONE OF THE MOST SANITIZED LOCATIONS, THE SOUTHEAST HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER AND THE ROOM WAS HUGE ENOUGH TO HAVE SOCIAL DISTANCE.

THEY SENT BACK UP MATERIAL.

THEY HAVE A MEETING AT 4:13 PM.

THEN ON TOP OF IT WAS NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN, CONTACT TEAM OF POSES, SONY CHANGE CHANGING FOR ALL THE ABOVE MR. PROPERTIES.

THEN ON TOP OF HIS NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN WAS COMPLETED UNDER THE CITY OF AUSTIN NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING AND PROGRAM, AND WAS ADOPTED AS PART OF THE OFFICE TOMORROW.

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ON SEPTEMBER 27, 2001, THE PROPERTIES B ONE B TWO AND B THREE APPROVED AS STRICTLY SF N P ZONING DEVELOPERS ARE TRYING TO MISREPRESENT THE ADOPTED PLAN.

WE PERSONALLY PARTICIPATED IN THE PLAN AND VOTED TO KEEP STRICTLY SF THREE, NOTHING HIGHER OR NOTHING IN SF ZONING.

WE ASKED THAT THE OFF THAT AUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION AND AUSTIN CITY COUNCIL REPRESENT A RESPECT, THE ADOPTED MONTOPOLIS PLAN AFTER EMERGENCE SUCCESSFUL GUESTS OF FORCES OR REFRESHES DEVELOP AT THE MONTOPOLIS NICO SCREW IN 2018.

THEN MY TOP IS COMMUNITY IS ONCE AGAIN, BEING BESIEGED BY PROFITS, THE REAL